Where pretty lies perish.
Mar 7th, 2019 by CH
Zoomed-in link.
The next time a leftoid you know brings up “White privilege”, casually inform xir, “that’s just a conspiracy theory”.
Another killer reframe: The Russia Collusion story is a “dual loyalty trope”.
Manafort memes, coming in hot… (h/t The Excruciationator)
PS How about dese fapples? CPAC is literally controlled opposition. Google paid them off to steer the convention away from discussing race, nationalism and populism.
Mar 7th, 2019 by CH
“We need more workers to grow the economy” is a devil’s bargain if there ever was one.
What’s the end game of Globohomo’s insatiable need for low wage workers and low brow consumers? 1 billion invaders in America? 2 billion? 5 billion? When does the economy stop needing imported workers? And when the economy stops growing, do these billions go back to their homelands?
The logic behind this apocalyptic economics is better understood if you read it as “we need more workers to grow the economy of the top 1%”. Those are the people who can afford to live away and barricade themselves off from the third world dollar-a-day scab laborers they invite into the country on the pretext of “growing the economy”.
It’s “privatize the profits, socialize the costs” on a leviathan scale. It’s the ideology of cancer. Constant growth, at the expense of societal health.
Your fat cat modern day robber barons like betabillionaire Jeff “chasing 50 year old cougar meat” Bezos get insanely rich in this system while regular Heritage Americans spanning the lower, working, and middle classes get saddled with the financial and social costs of evading, avoiding, and stoically enduring the Diversity Drones.
Bezos buys himself a second helipad. Joe from a Tijuanified formerly all-White town has to trudge to the store manager to buy a bottle of cough syrup locked behind bulletproof cases because the vibrant arrivals keep stealing it off the shelves.
Bezos buys a newspaper to turn into his personal propaganda organ which demonizes the one president in recent memory who was elected to look out for the people psychologically and economically displaced by globalist whoremongers like Bezos. Joe gets kicked out of banks and social media accounts for once expressing anger against the third worldization of his hometown.
Bezos smiles like a fox in the henhouse. Joe kills himself in a midst of a deep despair for his future and his children’s future.
A reader adds,
That’s exactly why the alt right needs to become environmentalists! We must stop immigration under the grounds of saving the environment and its limited resources! We are not going to win this battle with race based policies!!!
There are many logical and coherent arguments against mass immigration, including the disharmony caused by racial dissimilarities, but Trump seems determined to focus on just one (crime and drugs coming across the border).
Environmentalism, wage gutting, social disruption, economic externalities, packing the electoral college with imported voters bought on the cheap, straining the welfare state, etc etc. All these arguments against open un-selective borders, and more, are available to Trump, but he bangs one drum and leaves the rest of the kit unplayed.
Economically, too, the best-case growth argument is a chimera. What we have instead from open borders is a “per-capita recession”:
Endless growth is a Ponzi scheme. Instead of growth, we should be thinking in terms of managing a sustainable economy that abides natural fluctuations in the native population.
Does Trump understand this, or is he regressing to the fatuous old Boomercon he is at heart?
You tell me.
From my vantage, Trump has begun dancing to Globohomo’s tune.
Trump is prone to hyperbolic gaffes so I figured his SOTU call for more *legal* invaders was a brain fart to be ignored as his behind-the-scenes policies continued reducing legal immigration.
But now he’s repeated the claim, in print, a number of times since. And he has had roundtables with Globohomo’s finest to hammer home his capitulation to the open borders, big business lobby.
Does this guy NOT want to win reelection?
PA writes,
It’s one of two scenarios:
1. Trump will be an American Yeltsin.
2. What we see is the unimportant stuff; Trump is fighting the unseen power center and victory will set everything else right.
I can’t believe Trump would so brazenly betray his campaign promises (implied and stated), so his current actions make no sense unless it’s misdirection (good) or total co-option (bad).
Trump is gearing up to run 2020 on a Koch Bros.-approved anti-socialism, pro-globalism message. This would be a mistake. Anti-socialism won’t be a winning platform for Trump in 2020. He thinks it will because he’s a Boomercon, but the times have changed. He needs to push a socialism-lite for Whites if he wants to retain his hold on the crucial Midwest states.
He’s still sitting at 50% approval (give or take), but if his base gets wind of his plans to increase legal immigration, I wouldn’t be shocked to see his polls drop into the upper 20s.
PS Unparalleled shiv:
Mar 5th, 2019 by CH
Women shit test even when they aren’t thinking about it.
Women’s bodies BLOCK weak sperm by creating a ‘bottleneck’ in the uterus where stronger swimmers force their way through
The female reproductive tract is cleverly shaped to weed out weak sperm.
That’s the claim made by scientists at New York’s Cornell University, who say a series of ‘pinch points’ – such as a narrowing between the uterus and fallopian tubes – is the biological equivalent of an assault course.
As a result, only the strongest sperm cells can push their way through the bottleneck to reach the egg, creating a quality control process for fertilisation.
[…]
This adds further weight to the suggestion that the female body undertakes a selection process, rather than conception being random.
A shit test is basically a filter for men with alpha attitudes. Even at the level of the uterine tract, women are filtering the beta sperms from the ZFG sperms.
It would be interesting to know if this sperm selection process applies to extra-pair ejaculate competition as well as to single dose ejaculate.
Mar 4th, 2019 by CH
This is what shitlibs think of themselves when their self-perception algorithm is set to 100% Fantasy Fuel.
Shitlib phenotype reality:
PA comments,
It’s an interesting window into the lib-male’s soul. His antagonists, who represent MAGA men, aren’t evil-looking, scary or ridiculous. They are sad and weak looking.
Yet the lib’s self-image is that of the aggressor, or at least a hard-puncher in that single frame.
Doesn’t feel heroic to me. But the lib is clearly in throes of self-idealizing heroism when he verbally (it’s always about being so smart!) abuses defeated men.
Male shitlibs are like that version of George Costanza in the jerkstore episode. He’s always thinking of comebacks after the moment has passed, but finally has one and it lands with a thud. His self-satisfaction is immediately deflated.
Anyhow, PA has got it right. Shitlibs are into humiliation porn. They have a sadistic urge to cruelly humiliate weaker enemies, while stronger enemies elicit from the shitlib either deranged psychotic breaks or instant submission and pleas for mercy.
Where did this comic come from? Aquinas quips:
A [special person] fappatorium
PS Decent article about “conservative democracy”.
Mar 2nd, 2019 by CH
There is an epidemic raging of hot teachers banging their underage students. I consider it a harbinger of societal collapse.
The latest “hot for student” fiasco is a doozy.
Teacher needs to see me (and my friend) after school…
That’s a thousand underage cock stare.
You can practically see the faint streaks of six months’ worth of facials.
The kid has tight text game. Passes Jumbotron test. Abides Poon Commandment V: Adhere to the golden ratio (sends half as many texts as she does).
Why do women do this?
Part of the answer is the repercussion of a society which has stopped constraining female hypergamy.
And part of the answer is the de-masculinization of the beta hubbies of these succubi. These chicks are deprived of alpha male in their lives, and they’ll find it in the pre-verbal zfg arms of middle school boys.
Finally, infantilization has taken over the minds of so many women. They’ve never grown up and don’t want to grow up, so banging a student validates their self-perception.
You will be unsurprised to learn the husband of this dead-eyed boyfucker is at DEFCUCK 1. He knew this was going on (started when the boy was 12), and begged the student’s parents not to report his wife to police.
Footage just released also shows Zamora’s husband remained supportive of his wife despite the accusations.
Too many men “supporting” skank whores who don’t deserve it.
‘Not gonna discuss it with you,’ her husband tells police at one point. ‘Brittany is an adult. She’s the best, the best person I’ve ever known,’ he said.
Keep telling yourself that, bub.
It is not clear if they are still together or not.
If they aren’t, it was her decision.
The boy’s parents previously claimed Zamora’s husband Daniel called them and begged them not to report his wife to police after they saw her sexual texts, saying she had made a mistake.
Beta.
The parents told police that Zamora’s husband ‘harassed’ the father over the phone, begging him not to go to the authorities and insisting that his wife had ‘made a big mistake, but that she loved the kids,’ according to the documents.
Cringingly beta.
Daniel Zamora also allegedly suggested that he and the boy’s dad ‘meet up’ and ‘settle this,’ but the parent turned down his offer and hung up on him.
So fuckin beta.
Zamora and her husband, who she has known she was 16, married in 2015. They do not have any children.
Proof of betaness. She thought his seed unworthy of her womb.
I’m more sickened by the beta husband’s reaction than I am by his slutty teacher wife. This is how men without options behave when their “lucky strike” cheats on them: “She dindu nuffin! Please don’t leave me to masturbate again for another ten year dry spell!”
That’s her husband on the left. Big wide open mouth. Gloryhole face. Nümale submission gesture. He feels so lucky.
I can predict the end of a relationship by how “lucky” the man feels to be in it. The luckier he feels, the faster it ends.
BETA — pledge to stay with a depraved cheating whore
DIGNIFIED MAN — throw her to the wolves
PS Placing bets on the race of the student.
Feb 28th, 2019 by CH
Asshole Game is confusing to men who think it means incessantly insulting a woman and generally acting like a huge dick all the time, getting in fights and yelling at girls when things go sour.
It’s more nuanced than that.
A refined assholery is uncaring and aloof. Indifferent to a girl’s judgment. This is what you should strive toward.
A spiteful, bitter assholery is caring and invested. Sensitive to a girl’s judgment. This is what you should avoid.
There are tiers of assholery that are more or less suited to the type of girl with you. Younger women will need a bigger and stronger dose of Asshole Game than would older women. Extraverted girls respond better than introverted girls to assholes. Sluts and exhibitionists can handle extreme asshole game; chaste girls not so much. Ugly girls need niceguy game, hotties are a mixed bag, and the “almost there” 6s and 7s crave assholes.
Furthermore, the right dose of assholery depends on how you come across to a girl. Relative SMVs matter. An ugly or socially awkward man hitting on an ugly woman would need to ramp up his asshole game compared to a normal man hitting on that same woman.
All girls melt under the seductive power of assholery, but care should be taken to tailor your assholery to the girl. Pile driving a girl’s ego could backfire if she’s already got low self-esteem; softening your assholery could backfire if she’s an Instagram whore.
With this in mind, I present the Three Tiers of Assholery, from gentlest to roughest.
Tier 1 — Edgy Niceguy — is for your plain janes with a heart of gold. Girl next door, sweet church girl, Amish bish, that one girl in your STEM class, virgins, small town librarian, the formerly chubby thin girl who still has body image issues, etc.
Tier 2 — Charming Jerkboy — is for your fat-part-of-the-belle-curve aspiring cockteases. These are your 5s, 6s, and 7s who think they’re one step into good lighting from being 9s. Throw in some 8s who have dated too many provider beta males and now need an asshole to make them feel alive again. Also, super hot foreign girls are in this group, unless they’re Brit, in which case they belong with the Tier 3s. Basically, 80% of women react positively to Tier 2 assholes.
Tier 3 — Brutal Mindfucker — is for your standard issue social media-created thot. All your closeted tyrants, bartender sasspots, careerist shrikes, infanticide supporters, proto catladies, hipsterette scenesters, strippers, camwhores, jaded hotties, FOMO chicks, rainbow-haired and nose-pierced “nonconformists”, and Salon readers belong in this group.
Now I will give examples of each asshole tier, so men can better understand just what “being an asshole” means when applied in real life.
Tier 1 Asshole:
Cup your fart, open it in front of her face, then mock-beg for her mercy through gales of laughter
Tier 2 Asshole:
Cup fart, open under her nose, don’t smile
Tier 3 Asshole:
Cup fart, shove it in her face, tell her “you smelt it you dealt it”
***
Tier 1 Asshole:
Doodle a penis on her birthday card
Tier 2 Asshole:
Give her Skittles for her birthday
Tier 3 Asshole:
Forget her birthday, demand blowjob anyhow
***
Tier 1 Asshole:
Sixth night lay, condom
Tier 2 Asshole:
Third night lay, Pill
Tier 3 Asshole:
Same day lay, leave her with abortion bill and a funny walk
***
Tier 1 Asshole:
Her: “I think I’m falling for you!” You: “Aw, that’s cute”
Tier 2 Asshole:
Her: “I think I’m falling for you!” You: “Figures”
Tier 3 Asshole:
Her: “I think I’m falling for you!” You: “Why don’t you try falling on my cock right now” *ziiiiipp*
***
Tier 1 Asshole:
Girlfriend surprises you with morning blowie. You: “Baby, that was…pretty good”
Tier 2 Asshole:
GF surprises you with morning blowie. You: “Better use mouthwash”
Tier 3 Asshole:
GF surprises you with morning blowie. You: “Where’s breakfast?”
***
Tier 1 Asshole:
Girlfriend meets you at bar. You: “I can’t get away from you!” *smirk*
Tier 2 Asshole:
Girlfriend meets you at bar. You: “Oh great, you’re here, you can get me a drink now”
Tier 3 Asshole:
Girlfriend meets you at bar. You: “I can’t catch a break” *no change in facial expression*
***
Tier 1 Asshole:
Girl: “Let’s go see that RBG movie!” You: “Is that the one about the color wheel?”
Tier 2 Asshole:
Girl: “Let’s go see that RBG movie!” You: “Why don’t you take someone without a penis and balls”
Tier 3 Asshole:
Girl: “Let’s go see that RBG movie!” You: “We’re done”
***
Tier 1 Asshole:
Girl gets new hairstyle, smiles at you expectantly. You: “I like what you did to your nails”
Tier 2 Asshole:
Girl gets new hairstyle, smiles at you expectantly. You, falling backwards out of your chair in an exaggerated motion of faux surprise: “Fuck, what happened to that stuff on top of your head?”*
Tier 3 Asshole:
Girl gets new hairstyle, smiles at you expectantly. You: “Are you TRYING to be a lesbian?”
(*readers should direct their attention to the second commenter in that post’s comment thread.)
***
Tier 1 Asshole:
Girl tries to break up with you in public. You: “You’re a bad liar. But if this is what you really want, then I set you free.”
Tier 2 Asshole:
Girl tries to break up with you in public. You: “Well, that’s a load off.”
Tier 3 Asshole:
Girl tries to break up with you in public. You hit on a girl walking by.
***
Tier 1 Asshole:
Girlfriend calls you in the middle of the night, hysterical, to tell you she got into a car accident. You: “You tried parallel parking again, didn’t you?”
Tier 2 Asshole:
Girlfriend calls you in the middle of the night, hysterical, to tell you she got into a car accident. You: “Oh no! Is the car okay?”
Tier 3 Asshole:
Girlfriend calls you in the middle of the night, hysterical, to tell you she got into a car accident. You: “You called the wrong number, baby. Call the number on your triple A card.” *hangs up*
***
Tier 1 Asshole:
Girl wants you to buy her a drink two minutes after introducing yourself. You: “I don’t buy girls drinks, but you can buy me one”
Tier 2 Asshole:
Girl wants you to buy her a drink two minutes after introducing yourself. You: “The sex later better be good”
Tier 3 Asshole:
Girl wants you to buy her a drink two minutes after introducing yourself. You: “Sorry, I didn’t know you were a whore”
******
Looking back on my past relationships, I can’t believe how much Brutal Mindfuckery I committed against girls. But it worked. Sadly, it worked.
Feb 28th, 2019 by CH
From JJG,
Just saw an average looking girl I know on Instagram. Not a celebrity or talented in any way, solid 7. Had well over 200 likes for a pic in a party dress showing some cleavage. The first step is banning all social media and regulating the internet. Facebook, cell phones, Instagram are the primary causes if the skewed sex market. Literally over 200 thirsty betas and vapid sluts giving their fawning approval for absolutely nothing.
200 likes for a plain jane showing some cleavage
This is actually the apocalypse of the average joe
There are three events in modren human history one may pinpoint as singularities of corruption of our women.
The first Corruption Event severed woman from husband and supplanted him with the State.
The second Corruption Event severed woman from herself and supplanted her womb with careerism and cock hopping.
The third Corruption Event severed woman from reality and supplanted her humility with self-delusion and rage.
Reversing these corruption events, in full or in part, will be necessary to save America from her destiny with collapse.
***
PS As if Canada couldn’t get any gayer:
***
thordaddy comments,
No one and no collective is able to put “radical autonomy” back in the stable.
The nature of this escalating radicalism is the staunch belief in total annihilation at bodily/brain death.
If one is thinking in terms of resurrected eternal life, she can possibly get a leash on her “radical sexual autonomy.” Otherwise, perpetual self-annihilation.
Yes this gets at the core issue. Secularization is really the abandonment of belief in the afterlife, replaced with a belief in the illimitable void. This change of belief is the energy which fuels modren shitliberalism.
The ideology of the illimitable void is why, in my darker moments, I doubt America will get out of her predicament without first collapsing and allowing rebirth from the ashes.
Feb 27th, 2019 by CH
Feb 27th, 2019 by CH
The latest Fake Stat currently rubbing shitlib clits raw is this [very special study] purporting to prove that hate crimes are far more prevalent than are hate hoaxes:
Here go shitlibs again, with their inverted logic (a hate hoax means hate crimes are real!) playing fast and loose with data they comprehend just enough to obfuscate and twist into misleading headlines, hoping to pull a fast one on a short attention span public who still thinks the $PLC isn’t an anti-White hate organization.
A Sailer commenter called out this bullshit and tiresome leftoid tactic,
Just like that, the latest NYT “factoid” joins the “10% of Americans are gay” and “1 in 4 women are raped” and the rest of the BS everyone believes because they “read it somewhere.”
The online hoax lists show hundreds of examples.
And many–if not most–of the “real” ones are fakes.
The category error is definitional. There are reported hate crimes which were never investigated, there are investigated but unsolved hate crime reports, and there are proven and prosecuted hate crimes. “Hate crimes in the US (2016-2018): 21,000” doesn’t tell us much. 21,000 hate crimes could mean 21,000 reported hate crime hoaxes that were never disproven by a full police investigation. And it could mean 21,000 black-on-white hate crimes.
I’ll crib from International Jew, who came up with an apt analogy for this tedious data-sodomizing legerdemain by shitlibs,
When it comes to alleged hate crimes, the interesting question is: what percent of the thoroughly investigated ones were real?
You’d get a high “real” percent for UFOs to, if you compared total alleged sightings to the number that were investigated and debunked.
Maybe I’m slightly biased by my politics in this, but right now I can think of more hate hoaxes than I can recall real hate crimes.
Going down the shabbos hole to the source of the Fake Stat above, we find something very…predictable.
Brian Levin, the director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University in San Bernardino, who has been tracking staged and real hate crimes, counted 49 fake reports between 2016 and 2018. In the same time, Levin told Quartz, there were about 21,000 hate crimes. That makes the percentage of falsely reported attacks 0.2% of all hate crimes. (The FBI received 13,000 hate crime reports in 2016 and 2017, according to its latest data.)
While Levin concedes that his data collection methodology has limitations—he and his team rely on media reports—it is indicative of how rare it is for a hate crime to be made up.
A [special person] consulted an industry run by [special people] for tautological “evidence” that would support a [special narrative].
“It was in the media, so it must be true!”
Good lord, what a load of libfuckery.
More on Brian Levin,
The one-man-band behind the garbage called “research” in that article is Brian Levin.
You can find plenty about him online. Here is an example:
https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/michelle-malkin/how-manufacture-anti-muslim-hate-crime-epidemic
Andy Ngo has more: https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/02/hate-crime-hoaxes-reflect-americas-sickness/
This Levin character sounds like someone who really has a stick up his ass about Christian America.
One more great comment, from Almost Missouri:
Mikel Jollett’s “hate crime” numbers are really Annalisa Merelli’s numbers, which are really Brian Levin’s numbers, which are basically meaningless tautologies invented by Brian for the purpose of perpetuating his career.
OTOH, Merelli does write that “The FBI received 13,000 hate crime reports in 2016 and 2017”, which is true, in the sense that over two years the FBI received about that number of “reports”. But it turns out the FBI stats aren’t much better than SPLC alum Levin’s fake numbers.
The FBI—or other DoJ arm—could just total up the number of hate crime convictions in a year and have a pretty robust, verifiable and traceable number. But they don’t do this. Instead they total up “reports”, which are not convictions. They are just reports: someone (example: Jussie Smollett) told a law enforcement officer that a hate crime happened, and someone at the law enforcement agency (and by law that person has to be a designated “expert” on “hate crimes”, giving said “expert” a vested interest in justifying their “expertise” with large numbers of reports) passes a few general specs about the allegation on to the FBI, who tally it up for the big report. If the allegation is never confirmed, or if it turns out to be false, does the FBI subtract the number back out? Maybe, maybe not. Apparently certainly not if it takes into the next reporting period to establish the falsehood of the allegation, since the FBI does not issue revised statistics.
Then there is the fact that the definitions of “hate crime” are extremely loose. The perp, if they even have one, does not need to be charged with a hate crime for it to count as a “hate crime” for the FBI’s statistical purposes. For example, if the alleged victim is a member of the NAACP, the allegation is automatically a “hate crime” if the “hate crime” “expert” so designates it.
Unsurprisingly , the definitions and examples in the official docs are written to maximize culpability of whites. In spite of this, whites still manage to under-perform compared to their share of the population. No prizes for guessing which race most over-performs compared to their share of the population, despite the fact that this category of crime was tailor made to boost their victimhood and camouflage their criminality.
Finally, there seems to be no way to trace the FBI’s Hate Crime statistics back to the actual events that underlie them short of submitting thousands of FOIA requests per year, which still may not suffice. So there is no objective, independent way to verify the FBI’s “Hate Crime” stats.
tl;dr
Despite the existence of actual, verifiable numbers of hate crime convictions existing, the FBI/DoJ ignores that in favor of an opaque, unverifiable, easily distorted process that maximizes “hate crime” claims with no connection to actual convictions. Lazy and dishonest journalists such as Jollett and Merelli bandy these fake stats about with gay abandon. Thus does the public-private partnership Fake News Juggernaut roll on.
Steve Sailer — a better man than Mikel Jollett or Brian Levin could ever hope to be — ran the real numbers and came up with a more accurate ratio of real hate crimes to hate hoax crimes.
Hoaxes as elaborate as the Empire TV star’s are rare, but it’s hardly uncommon for, say, the perpetrator to turn out to be nonwhite, or the act, such as posting a flyer mentioning “It’s okay to be white,” to be not (yet, at least) a crime, or for the motives to be murkier than you’d imagine from reading Southern Poverty Law Center fund-raising junk mail.
[…]
But what percentage of these press allegations have since been validated?
The methodological issue is, how do we keep advocates from memory-holing contrary data?
My solution is to use The New York Times’ own “This Week in Hate” columns. I let the pinnacle of Establishment respectability take their best shot, curating their own list of hate crimes from across the country. I then evaluate how The New York Times did.
[…]
For the purposes of this essay, I analyzed all 21 incidents in the second (12/6/16) and third (12/13/16) weeks of “This Week in Hate,” looking for pro and con evidence that has accumulated in the 26 months since on the validity of the NYT’s accounts. (I skipped the first week, assuming it was better to let the NYT get into its stride. I encourage other researchers to check out the rest of “This Week in Hate,” which finally petered out in July 2017.)
How many of the 21 incidents have resulted in hate-crime convictions? How many have been shown to be a complete hoax? How many are unconfirmed by the justice system but seem plausible? How many unconfirmed occurrences are dubious?
[…]
As I count them, of the 21 incidents carefully curated by the NYTto demonstrate that white Trumpists are waging a war of hate on the true Americans:
Two are more or less proven.
Five are unproven but more likely than not.
Seven are unproven and more unlikely than not.
And seven are disproven.
So, the nation’s Newspaper of Record got at least an average of one out of three of its “This Week in Hate” stories right. On the other hand, the facts in another one out of three cases undermine the NYT’s Narrative.
For the Times to be right on merely a simple majority (11 of 21) of its handpicked stories of white Trump criminality, four of the seven unlikely incidents would have to turn out to be true.
Therefore, the Times probably failed to reach even 50 percent accuracy.
Brutal debunking. FATALITY
Andy Ngo likewise concludes that there is an epidemic of (mostly anti-White blood libeling) hate hoaxes:
PS There’s no such thing as “hate speech”. There is only free speech. And there is no such thing as “hate crime”. There is crime. We shouldn’t prosecute thoughts. We should prosecute actions. End the “hate crime” farce now.
Family sizes have been shrinking all over the developed world.
The downstream psychological and societal impacts of only children are greatly under-appreciated by researchers.
For instance, fewer children means parents have less incentive to discipline or chastise those children for bad life choices. A parent is likely to fear losing the love of an only child more than would a parent fear losing the love of one of her six children.
If an only child decides to troon out, her parents might be hesitant to express much displeasure and disapproval because they don't have any other children to fill the void if that tranny-child decides to rescind her love.
Something like this dynamic, on a large societal scale, has serious implications for the shape of the culture and the willingness of parents to administer tough love. Pampered only children become vehicles for cultural degeneracy by drawing in fearful parents to sustain the system.
Butting into this conversation, I have complicated feelings about AI. It is a weapon that we absolutely must not allow the Left to monopolize. The potential to seriously undermine leftoid cultural hegemony via right-wing AI is vast.
But I also know that this is a weapon which in time will destroy us all by ushering into existence the Zero Trust Society and the Zero Employment Economy.
The former is the more likely outcome. For example, imagine AI image generation that can fool even the experts, and then imagine that tech in the hands of anti-Whites, who get to work using AI to retcon our White past with the addition of nonwhites in our photos, videos, and books. Soon, White people could become conditioned to acccept the false memory of a past America that was always majority nonwhite. A massive psy ops of that nature would effectively quell any pockets of White resistance to their racial overrun.
What AI would unleash is the institutionalization of the inability to discern reality from fantasy. People who cannot reliably know truth from fiction in media and government press releases will suffer extreme mental duress, and many will react to this funhouse mirror world by dropping out and re-grounding themselves into very small kinship circles, at the level of hamlets and rural outposts.
People in general just do not sufficiently grasp how utterly awful a zero trust society will be in practice.
Through the ballot box.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
😂😂 I had you going didn't I?
What does a Zero Trust Society look like?
It looks like Mass Surveillance and biometrics.
Colorado's White population is shrinking, and currently sits at 65% of the state total. The beaner population is exploding.
"Despite consistent increases in net migration, Colorado’s future growth is precarious. Since 2021, the increases in migration to Colorado have almost exclusively come from international migration, individuals migrating from outside of the United States directly to Colorado, rather than domestic migration, movement from other states into Colorado."
storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/3aa6968ec7a34ff8
For a while, there was domestic net migration flow into Colorado, driven by White Millennials, but that appears to have tapered off.
Politically, what is happening in CO is similar to what has happened in CA. Conservative Whites left, and liberal Whites remained behind or moved in. As nonwhites (mostly hispanics) quickly began to electorally and geographically displace the Whites, the latter responded by either leaving or becoming even more rabidly anti-racist.
This is not a surprising reaction, because it reflects an all too common Stockholm Syndrome attitude toward racial displacement:
"If I overtly express my support for the beaners, they will treat me well and the other liberal Whites won't exile me for wrongthink."
If that's what Kavanaugh wrote or implied, then he's basically saying what all of us are thinking: that too much of our national policy is being foisted on the judiciary to decide.
Which is correct, but also highlights the sheer unlikelihood of Congress legislating anything that directly benefits White America. Congress' inability to do its job is not so much the result of institutional inertia as it is the consequence of an upside-down judaized morality that prevents the passing of common sense legislation.
Who is more anti-social? The man driving the oversized pickup truck with the pissing Calvin sticker on it, or the woman screaming at you like a banshee for saying trannies should not be public school teachers?
I see anti-social people everywhere.
Over 40% of food packaged and sold in the US is kosher.
jews are 2% of the US population.
In effect, Whites are paying a jew tax on their grocery purchases that they did not want nor vote for.
Whites are paying the Jewzya.
Are the Whites or the niggers winning the World Cup?
I wonder if, at this point, the MAGA red cap does nothing but signal performative spitefulness, and that this perception of neutered rebellion encourages leftoids of either sex but mostly women to make public spectacles of themselves lashing out at MAGA hat wearing White dudes.
If White men were to, instead, brazenly occupy the public square in Hugo Boss SS aesthetics and a happy smile, it would signal intent of purpose, and some of these crazy White women might be more circumspect when confronted by their presence.
"Every woman yearns to submit, but only to he who is worthy of her submission"
Comment Of The Week: The Surrender Of Privacy
Mar 1st, 2019 by CH
Atavator wins this week’s COTW in high-falutin’ fashion, responding to a comment I made about the disheartening spectacle of Americans willingly surrendering their privacy to a ravenous, growing Surveillance State.
The dominance of extraversion at the expense of introversion is one of the less appreciated social factors contributing to national decline, particularly decline in White nations, as Whites are, racially, primarily introverted (with a healthy minority of extraverts balancing out the race — in contrast to the almost exclusively introverted asians).
The combination of coddling and encouragement to extraversion — in short, feminization and judaicization — has been lethal to Americans’ “interiority”. We can see the consequences of this malign cultural change in the demand for “safe spaces”, the thin-skinned hysteria to disagreement, the intolerance of opposing world views, the attention whoring, the psychological projection, and the utter lack of self-awareness.
There’s one word that nicely describes all of the above: chutzpah.
If you’ve lost contact with your interior self, you won’t feel its loss when the Surveillance State steals it away from you.
Posted in Comment Winners | 135 Comments »