This is why it’s wise to keep women out of vanguard roles in a revolutionary movement:
Perhaps the most important lesson here is that women are a weak point in any political movement, especially a dissident movement. There is something uniformly pathological about the ones who jump to the front lines of ideological battle.
I wasn’t aware of that sordid drama involving (Katie?} McHugh, but the theme of it strikes me as all too familiar. Women are poison pills dropped in the chalice of insurgencies fighting against the status quo.
Underneath all the rationalizations, men fight for beautiful, young women. Men don’t fight for land, or honors, or money, except insofar as those things earn them access to beautiful, young women.
Consciously, men will tell themselves otherwise and pen odes to loftier ideals, but the Darwinian primal impulse is the lure of fertile furrow.
As such, women should inspire, not aspire. Women, particularly young cuties in the bloom of their slender hourglass perfection, are inspirations to men to reach for the brass ring. An insurgency seeking to topple a corrupt establishment is best led by men, compelled by an unspoken and often unacknowledged desire to attract young cuties, intuitively grasping that a victory over the corrupt ruling class means more prime poon for those rebel men.
Women who aspire to leading roles in those insurgencies are suspect operatives, for they are purposefully abdicating their natural place in the cosmic order as inspirations to stronger, integrous men. Placing women at the ideological front lines is courting the disaster of gossipy in-fighting and betrayal; women are powerfully drawn to the glitter of social status, and a revolution in which they play a significant face time part puts them in close proximity to the enemy establishment tempting women with penumbras of reflected status. Women can’t resist the siren song of social elevation, attention whoring, and credentialism, however superficial and unearned. Presented with these irresistible offers, women will backstab allies to get at them.
There is also something to be said for distrusting women who have the same passionate drive as men to achieve in the world of men. Women who aspire to greatness in endeavors that are naturally and historically the domain of men are women who are, essentially, at war with their own femaleness. It would be the same distrustful reaction both men and women have to effeminate men who forsake manly pursuits to succeed in the natural domains of women. Identity crises in either sex provoke distrust in others. We are rightfully suspicious of men or women who choose to defy their sex’s norms and temperaments.
Yet Orwell used say that women were more bitter and intolerant with their ‘smelly orthodoxies’ than were men.
LikeLiked by 3 people
IS, I think the keyword there is “their”.
Dr T threw out an epic poast on the previous thread, concerning the psychological “astroturfing” of the females of Greater Worshington DC USA.
To paraphrase the j00ess, Gertrude Stein, with women, is there a their there?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Fair point CO.
LikeLiked by 1 person
thx oblivious…glad you read it
women are consummate herd animals…they all like and do the same things.
this latest go-round with OLD has really hit that home and the recognition that they are all becoming more the same than they used to be.
The same fucking elephant is in like dozens of profiles. the same pictures of the same places taken from the same exact spot. like df, did you all go there together and form a line like this is a mall santa?
their sameness is actually converging…women are getting less diverse as time goes on, at least here. And most other places too, just a different conformity.
netflix binging and all of the TV watching does not help at all…it’s made things astoundingly worse.
We’re steaming toward a Demolition Woman world where every one of them is Taco Bell.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Men don’t fight for land, or honors, or money, except insofar as those things earn them access to beautiful, young women.
Come on, man. This scientistic superstition was stale back when you were using it to establish a rough-and-ready PUA architectonic, but still relying on a collection of Old Wives Tales is unbecoming a man of your experience. Surely you’ve learned something in the intervening decade. Even the (honest) left is giving up on naturalism. It’s sounding more and more like a personal issue.
All that Alexander, the Khans, Caesar, and Constantine wanted was some strange? And when they got more varieties of pussy than they could physically stick their dick in over ten lifetimes, what motivated them then? SMH
Consciously, men will tell themselves otherwise and pen odes to loftier ideals, but the Darwinian primal impulse is the lure of fertile furrow.
https://www.amazon.com/Darwin-Devolves-Science-Challenges-Evolution/dp/0062842617
For real, those old lefty enkikenment idols are eroding into dust. You need sturdier epistemologies. My boy Augustus of the Labcoat Hater Cru will back me up.
The tragedy of it all is that you don’t need this flimsy backup to your solid wisdom by observation. It will discredit you in the end. Haven’t you noticed the politics of the people who tend to think this way? The character? The … smell? Go with your olfactory sense. The nose knows. Learn from BAP. Aesthetics uber alles.
LikeLiked by 3 people
What’s the world coming to — I mostly agree with King about something.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I find myself generally in agreement as well.
LikeLike
King Tut-tut’s unattractive writing has zero natural humor or poetry, and serves only to tut-tut at others here; and he worships a Jew from a recycled allegory for the movement of objects in the sky; but I think many here agree that men have faculties beyond the purely primal. I myself hate evil, and I recognize sacredness in things like ]children[ and the orderly civilizations we made in the past.
CH’s argument (or thought experiment) is fair in the physical plane, but consciousness alone evidences more to the universe and ourselves. After all, computers can’t feel.
Hmh I’m even on board with Sorcerygod here. Must be the season of the witch.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Be a man and just acknowledge a truth without all of that faggoty throat clearing before the word “but.” You sound like you’re gargling balls.
LikeLike
Owned.
LikeLike
You guys know the old saying; a retarded Omega Christian is right once a week.
LikeLike
Show us on the doll where the priest touched you, Johnny. It’s ok now.
LikeLike
meh…the general statement is true
stop being a fuckin liberal
LikeLike
You’re boring me, let’s have some Boomer music
LikeLike
Hey Mr T, take some lessons in how to pick up foxes
LikeLike
Xtianity was stale a century ago too and yet it doesn’t stop you from jerking off while thinking of magical Jews.
LikeLike
if you think about their (women’s) orthodoxies as something which is inherently tethered towards prevailing power or status centers amongst the broader culture, then Orwell’s sentiment make’s more sense.
a women’s political philosophy is like that of a beta orbiter (me), it will track (not follow) a lead no matter where the lead may go. considered minus it’s lead the female zeitgeist (average female sentiment) may appear random and capricious. but it’s like tracking the path of earth’s moon across the solar system without considering either the earth or the sun in the equation.
what was i talking about?
LikeLike
I’ve been looking for this quote from Orwell and can only find him generally condemning intellectuals for their smelly little orthodoxies. Can you tell me where the part is about women being worse than men?
LikeLike
As an antidote to the Black Pill which CH just poasted, have a gander at this here story: Farmers remain silent at auction so young man can buy his family farm back http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3747820/posts
LikeLiked by 11 people
^^^^^That’s how it’s done, muh White bruthaz.
That’s how it’s done.
PRO-TIP: You might want to have a hankie ready to dip in the corner of your eye after you read that story.
LikeLiked by 4 people
The other farmers certainly didn’t remain silent in order to be rewarded with “younger, tighter, fitter”. There are times when some people uphold higher ideals than just material desires. Those who live only in the material world cannot understand such things, and dismiss such actions as cheap rationalizations driven purely by a biological impulse.
LikeLiked by 7 people
This is why we need laws — that every other country have — forbidding foreign ownership of our lands. This feelgood story took place in 2011. In Current Year, that auction would have been crawling with chink “investors” to reap spoils.
LikeLiked by 2 people
There are biological arguments that explain altruism/kindness. However, they can’t explain the experience of such things.
LikeLike
Agreed. There is so much evil and just plain old sh*t people in the world that we forget how many decent people there are in the heartlands of our Nations. Stories like that really warm the heart.
LikeLike
Hate to be that guy, but this sounds made up. Suspiciously devoid of detail, as in last names, location (aside from “Nebraska” ), and the story is only showing up on out of the way blogs / social media, not any local or national news sites. Something just isn’t quite right here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It might not have been as grandiose as that one time on Little House on the Prairie, where the townsfolk blocked outsiders from attending that one bankrupt farmer’s auction, and they all bought each of his assets for $1 and sold it back to him.
In this case, the farmer was (merely?) reclaiming 80 acres that had been parceled out to an overseas cousin, so they could reunify the family farm. The article doesn’t specify how big the original farm was, so it may have been 80 + 80, or 1000 + 80.
Still a nice story though.
LikeLike
If it was fiction, at least it wasn’t of the usual demoralization agitprop sort.
LikeLiked by 3 people
LikeLiked by 2 people
i JUST watched that scene literally a day or two ago…a beautiful scene…one of my favorite movies
LikeLike
It’s fake.
LikeLike
I’ll just assume it was whyt folk.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Madeline Albright and Condolezza Rice were two women, one Democrat and one Republican, who acted as tokens in a Man’s World. Hired because of the gender alone, they were proud to be attention whoring on a grand scale — a world scale, with cameras taking their pictures! *Deadpool-like gesture of hands to the mouth* Oh my!
*Sors growing more serious* If a woman enters a man’s world, she expects him to change to better suit her comfort. I remember reading a woman judge complaining about having to wear “male clothes”. It’s like business attire for women. The reason women don’t wear ties is because it lets them off the hook for their man-like responsibility.
In the end, a woman will rule with her emotions, not her intellect — and she will take advice from those men below her who win her favor, not the men — most severe — who are likely to be most right.
LikeLike
congosleeza “wild brown” rice was a token nigga made to be a “conservative” by guilt ridden whites in the GOP who like colin powell and head of the GOP mike steele all reverted back to the tribe by voting for purple lipped Obama madeline Albright was asked by leslie stahl about the sanctions that led to the death of over 500K Iraqi kids trying desperately to keep Talmudic foam coming out of her mouth due to a wargasm said we think it was worth it
LikeLiked by 5 people
Tangled up prose, but nicely phrased nevertheless.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The only difference is that Colin Powell was/is a Class A scumbag globalist and Rice wasn’t *exactly*, though she did go along for the ride.
I hate Powell with the heat of a thousand suns. And Shalikashvili is hopefully being hollowed out in eternity for use as a prophylactic for Satan’s thorny poison kock.
LikeLiked by 2 people
cory…. colin powell made his bones covering up the Mai Lai massacre. shit always rises to the top
LikeLike
sorcerygod….I quit high school at barely 16 started carrying lumber on a framing job lol
LikeLike
I want to hear Meener at a poetry slam. Dat shit’s mothafuckin jazz…
LikeLike
Corinth, my nigga
LikeLike
Ramzpaul came out with a good video on this yesterday.
LikeLike
From the last chapter of 1984
He knew now what had changed in her. Her face was sallower, and there was a long scar, partly hidden by the hair, across her forehead and temple; but that was not the change. It was that her waist had grown thicker, and, in a surprising way, had stiffened. He remembered how once, after the explosion of a rocket bomb, he had helped to drag a corpse out of some ruins, and had been astonished not only by the incredible weight of the thing, but by its rigidity and awkwardness to handle, which made it seem more like stone than flesh. Her body felt like that. It occurred to him that the texture of her skin would be quite different from what it had once been.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is that about Julia?
When I read the book as a 13 yr old, I pictured a b actress whom I saw in the first Billy Jack movie,”Born Losers,” named Elizabeth James. Bitch was hot!
LikeLike
Elizabeth James, a pleasingly plump Liza Minnelli, but without the pipes.
Yeah, I liked her too, back in the day… if memory serves, I only ever saw her in one other movie, a bit part as a police dispatcher in Dirty Mary, Crazy Larry.
LikeLike
I can’t seem to find a clip of the final scene which doesn’t give away too many spoilers…
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=final+scene+dirty+mary+crazy+larry
LikeLike
That thumbnail shot of the fat bitch’s eyes scream crazy, as well as “punch here”.
LikeLike
Hey Cap’n, that’s Susan George. Now I know that you’re not a Boomer.
She’d always play the slut in films like Straw Dogs and even banging a negro slave in Mandingo. She gets knocked up by the nogger and when mammy tells her father-in-law played by James Mason he just says ‘snuff it out’
The Mandingo get boiled in a vat and held down with a pitchfork at the end.
Why don’t they make good films like this anymore?
And btw, it seems that only Englishmen can play a good Southerner :o) Crackers can’t even play themselves lol
LikeLike
I read the scuzzfeed article and just felt sorry for the premature catlady (and anybody who thirsted after her when she was adorbs). She was very solid back in the day and said the right things. Most importantly, she judged the weak men around her and called them out in a way only young women could.
But she hitched her wagon to a pagan LARPer (wolfie95?) who seriously went howling in the woods to find manliness somewhere on This Gay Earth. Not that anyone should blame her boyfriend either. But two confused people like that have no chance to lead each other out of the poz. You think (((they))) would let it be that easy?
If St. Augustine and The City of God took her away from that cringe festival, she is on balance better off. The girl had no leadership in her life except from the cartoon alpha poseurs with which this board is often home to. The poison makes the dose, and OD’ing on red pills is not good for anyone’s health. It can be a life-saving medicine or a junkie’s death wish. Now she clings to Augustine like a life raft. She will be fine.
Calling her treacherous or a turncoat is pointless. Women can’t be anything other than what they are.
The scorpion shrugged, and did a little dance on the drowning frog’s back.
“I could not help myself. It is my nature.”
Then they both sank into the waters of the swiftly flowing river.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Women are the weak point because a woman’s impression of rebellion is a Hollywood impression of rebellion. A rebellion where she’s at the front. A rebellion where she’s a focus of attention. A rebellion where she survives. Don’t get me wrong a lot of guys have these fantasies too, but the difference is an implicit genetic level understanding among men that things aren’t going back to normal when this is all over.
Women love normal. They crave safety and the status quo. They crave rebellious men who can give it to them…after it’s all over and they survive of course. Worse still, they serve as a foible for mercy upon those that deserve none, like ISIL brides and their demon spawn cooing to media harridans to be let back in to the US or UK when they and their children should be publicly burned alive.
Women do not belong on the either the real or ideological front lines of anything. And if they won’t ‘lean out’, strong men should show them how.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Women love normal.
More precisely, I would say, women love the abnormality and highs of drama and soap opera reality that RETURNS TO NORMAL once the hormones and endorphins are given a good wringing twist.
LikeLiked by 2 people
yes women HATE when things are going smoothly. they want misery and drama just like Eve in paradise had to fuck around with the snake devil. that is why soap operas are constant turmoil
LikeLiked by 2 people
A rebellion featuring her and…Fernando!
LikeLike
LikeLike
Men enjoy physical chaos whereas women enjoy interpersonal chaos. Women enjoy the instability caused by drama and intrigue whereas men can thrive where the environment is unsafe or even violent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Men enjoy order. That’s why civilization was finally able to creep in when someone in the Neolithic realized after 75,000 years that matrilineal magic womb worship voodoo shit didn’t actually work and that food could be reliably grown out of the ground, not at the beck of a drugged out spinster.
LikeLike
@Neo
People did not know that PIV sex caused pregnancy during all of that time.They had no idea why females of a certain age had these things called babies or that a male was involved in the process.They operated on instinct which is a sort of inherited memory and is subconscious where you do certain things but don’t really consciously know why you do them, it just feels normal to you.
It really wasn’t until about 7k years ago and when people settled in an area, grew food, and bred animals and kept them in enclosures that men finally understood the facts of life.
Many of our characteristics are a remnant of that 2m years of not knowing and not the 7k short years of being somewhat enlightened.
And btw, the aborigines did not know that piv sex pregnancy until they came into contact with White people and that’s only a couple of hundred years.
LikeLike
“Women love normal. They crave safety and the status quo. They crave rebellious men who can give it to them…”
That’s strong right there.
Best, simplest, most concise breakdown of broads to date.
+1
LikeLike
Women love both normal and exciting, depending on the time of the month and the age of their eggs.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Shit, I had to deal with this in my fem-domniated workplace, which was gossipy in-fighting and betrayal to a tee.
Towards the end, seeing my fem boss and her boss trying to figure shit out was nothing short of hilarious, if it wasn’t outright frustrating.
LikeLike
mendo…best way to deal with illogical idiotic women is to set them off on each other
LikeLike
Hawt
LikeLike
King,
What are you currently reading?
LikeLike
Discourses on Livy (with Livy nearby to skim), Physics of Immortality (Tipler), Idol of Our Age (Mahoney), Unmasking the Administrative State (Marini), Dark Secrets of SHTF Survival (Begovic). For fiction, Eco’s Name of the Rose and Wolfe’s Back to Blood.
You have anything to recommend?
LikeLike
Guettee’s “The Papacy”
LikeLike
i thought this was gonna read, “…is to set them ON FIRE”
that’s where the hell my mind went when I heard this shit
LikeLike
Discourses on Livy (with Livy nearby to skim)
I see you took my advice about Machiavelli
LikeLike
Hello, arrögant íllíterate, still blústering like a teénagér. You bötched the attempt to schöol me on Machiavelli. Go back to your shámeful perförmance and be made wise.
LikeLike
An important corollary is a recipe.
IF you are a ruler, or one of the coterie of rulers, and you want a dependable army to go grab you some more territory, a useful strategy is to restrict access to women. Then men will willingly join an army to go get themselves some.
One of the ways to do this is to encourage polygamy, formal or informal. This will by necessity leave a lot of men without women.
However, the restriction plan is dangerous. You are playing with fire. The unmated men just might turn on you or the said coterie.
Thesedays, above all control social media. Learn from the best. Create a Baidu.
LikeLike
The question of women boils down to aptitude, Women’s Aptitude. How skilled are they really?
Historically, most men thinkers have slammed women’s ability to think. There have been a lot of ways to categorize this, from “they’re like children” to “they’re intellectual copycats”. But I think the best way is this:
When I go around in my life, I listen to other people talking. Countless times I’ve heard guys discussing things like computers, business, music. I can’t recall ONCE — NOT ONCE — hearing two women discussing a world of ideas. If the world of ideas is a beach with waves of thought coming in, women are far inland in the jungle.
LikeLike
I think this is what you’re referring to, but its from Eleanor muthereffing Roosevelt:
“Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people”
LikeLike
Eleanor Roosevelt was such a misogynist. Then again she probably thought she was one of those “strong women” who was different from her weak sisters.
LikeLike
I always thought that line behind every great man is a great woman is risable vomitous puke material.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“I always thought that line behind every great man is a great woman is risable vomitous puke material.”
You’ve got that right, brother.
LikeLiked by 2 people
well perhaps the point is that she is behind therefore not interfering
LikeLike
Behind every great man is a great woman, making him great sandwiches and babies.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“women should inspire, not aspire”
Pearls CH. Pearls.
LikeLiked by 4 people
And certainly not perspire. Unless in their service of their man.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ch may have a portal to a parallel universe, meatworld version, simply describing matter of factly how things should be
LikeLike
women should make my dick hard then cook and clean
LikeLiked by 3 people
and not necessarily in that order
LikeLiked by 1 person
lol any combination will work well
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Women love normal. They crave safety and the status quo. They crave rebellious men who can give it to them…”
That’s strong right there.
Best, simplest, most concise breakdown of broads to date.
+1
LikeLike
Make it STOP being hard
Fify
LikeLike
>>>>> “women should inspire, not aspire” Pearls CH. Pearls.
In Roman mythology, the Harvest is governed by a G0d, Saturn [who must plow & plant his seed & nurture the seedlings & eventually reap their fruit].
Whereas the Hunt is governed by a Goddess, Diana, who INSPIRES the hunters to track down & sl@y the beasts of the forest.
LikeLike
Empowering women lowers population growth. Proof of this is everywhere. Japan is one example.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like your new photo picture. Didn’t you change it? The head went from lying down to facing directly to the lens?
LikeLike
Gay.
LikeLiked by 3 people
*grinning* But SUAVELY gay.
LikeLike
It would be exhausting to try to follow all the secret rules and hidden codes of this virtual place.
Better than that: just be yourself. I do find that most critics are those who don’t have much that comes out of their mouths, and sniping is the only way to appear on the main board . . .
LikeLike
LikeLike
Damn! I sure am! *blowing on knuckles and buffing it on a tux*
LikeLike
Highly skilled in your assumed faggotry. Way to make it gay. You must finger your own asshole for motivation.
LikeLike
If the protagonist is a detective, and flatulence the crime, he might indeed finger the old council.
LikeLike
*grinning* But SUAVELY gay.
WELP
LikeLike
I don’t know about men fighting wars to get young women being the Romans killed everybody in a city they took and were promised by their commanders to get part of the loot. in reality they were able to send for their families and occupy the conquered land
LikeLike
I think a woman’s loyalty to a cause, and her leadership position within it, remains solid… so long as she remains surrounded by her support allies and they are in the catbird seat.
And of course, there are all sorts of stories of radical fems in various terrorist orgs, but there again, as long as she’s surrounded by the power of her group, she’ll be rock solid.
White folks, and ESPECIALLY the alt-R, ain’t there yet. We only “stick together” under the rarest of instances, and almost never when things are going materially well… then, pretty much only when the gummint gives us a permission slip.
LikeLike
I hate the infighting of the men here.
I would gladly take all the abuse and negativity upon myself if it would mean that the others got a free pass from it. The alt-right needs much more unity. The liberals have it, we don’t have as much.
LikeLike
I’ll start by breaking your fingers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
These evil pagan Romans
This could not have happened in The city of God Lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
LikeLike
Underrated comment from GE.
A lot to dissect here.
“so long as she remains surrounded by her support allies and they are in the catbird seat.”
And that’s the problem. You’d have to sequester her like the mob wives in Goodfellas (and maybe then some.) Because it isn’t “cool” to be rayciss. I just read the soyfeed article. Her betrayal (apparently she doxed people who donated to her when she was down and out) came after she had been fired from breitbart. She was instantly surrounded by MSM.
The temptation toward shallow attention whoring is just too strong in broads. They weren’t built to withstand peer pressure. You could make the argument they were designed specifically to cave in to it.
I took some heat in the past for bringing this up. Who gaf if they call us a bunch of incels? I dgaf. The messenger is absolutely just as important as the message. I do not trust a broad with our message. None.
They cannot resist the possibility of msm popularity.
When my soul was seeking yet not finding, one righteous man in a thousand I have found, but a woman? Not one.
Besides, if we box them out, isn’t there a CH maxim somewhere stating that a broad will never work harder than to get into a club that won’t have her?
TLDR:
Do not give the microphone to a broad. Any broad. Asking for trouble.
Unfollow goldy (the nignog hugger) and Southern the documented shark. Box them out. Zero attention. What does it get guys anyway? Never understood it.
Glad you’re all my bros.
FE
LikeLiked by 3 people
The paradox faced by the white knights who say that “we need women on our side to win” is the that way to get them on our side is to win first.
Not that they’re capable of realizing this, of course.
LikeLiked by 1 person
the way to get them on our side is to win first.
Rayp of the Sabine Women FTW
LikeLike
“…came after she had been fired from breitbart.”
This reminded me of the meme with the Venezuelan streetwalkers that CH posted recently.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thread winner to Iron.
No, wait. I think Uncle Adolf’s last words were, “I told you I need more faggots and frauleins! How can I win a war without faggots and frauleins!”
LikeLike
Women are not loyal to their own race much less a cause. She’s always looking for the next best deal. Past 35 she’s looking for any deal or suicide. Suicide is becoming more common for middle age women because if they haven’t been muhried by then they are worthless and they know it.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Past 35 she’s looking for any deal or suicide.
I get you were being serious, but bro I lol’ed hard.
LikeLiked by 2 people
No I find it hilarious.
LikeLiked by 1 person
should have been posted below the statue calling for rape lolz
LikeLike
You’re all over the place, bro. Bring it on in some.
LikeLike
we have the problem of having you fucking jew worshipping jesus freaks CONSTANTLY trying to shove your cursed suicidal doomsday cult down our throats.
be better if you simply STFU about it
LikeLike
I haerd abowt a real life eester egg teh 0ther day from a whyz 0ld wh1te man. He sed that put teh j00 in the 0ven, set teh timer, and go upstares to yore w00min. If you put yore wh1te bunz in her wh1te 0ven at teh EXACT m0ment teh 0ven timer goes off to indicate teh j00 is dun, you will unl0ck a secret m0dmail message on ur celly fone that gives yoo teh access codez to M@rk €uckerburgs faceb00k control server.
G0nna try it L8r
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lzozzlolzozlolzzlolzz
LikeLike
“Underneath all the rationalizations, men fight for beautiful, young women. Men don’t fight for land, or honors, or money, except insofar as those things earn them access to beautiful, young women.”
agree
and would add milius’ view
“to crush enemies, see them driven before you and to hear the lamentations of their women”
young prime beautiful women are a primary driver (and probably #1)
but…. so is delivering pain to your enemy
lots of people fight for that too and see young women as a benefit already guaranteed to them by virtue of simply being men
men with abundance mindset would choose watching their enemy get hanged by the neck until dead over young pussy every time as young pussy is had with game at anytime but good traitor hangings only happen in wartime
LikeLike
Not to mention that women get turned on by men dominating and disposing of their enemies in a gruesome manner
LikeLike
@VFM
Just saw your other post and got blocked. Apologies! (ha)
Yes- you’re right on. Repeat exposure will limit flakes. No question.
Best renewed source of repeat exposure is to have a buddy who dates lots of chicks. Pillage those chicks’ friends network.
Helps if you return the favor..)
LikeLiked by 1 person
One other thing I forgot to mention. If you hit on a broad, and she turns you down, but you see her later at another venue (or at another time and place) take another run at her.
Can’t tell you how many times this has worked. Somehow you are now “safe.” Don’t ask me to explain broadbrain anymore than libtardbrain.
You can just point at them and say, “Hey! It’s the (insert rooftop bar, dive bar, wherever you know them from) chicks!” They’ll come over and somehow you now “know” them.
Works as much as anything else. Good hunting.
FE
LikeLiked by 3 people
Somehow you are now “safe.”
I suspect it’s based upon how you handled her rejection. I’d swear women reject men on purpose to filter out gammas and niceguys, even if they are interested. Maybe especially if they’re interested.
Pillage those chicks’ friends network
The phenomenon of preselection, or how crushes are contagious among a woman’s friends, is extremely helpful to one’s ZFG attitude.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tried and failed to use the Quote function…
LikeLike
” young prime beautiful women are a primary driver ”
A million plus Germans died on the Eastern Front for prime poo tang ? I seriously doubt that sir.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Even if they were conscripts, the fact that veterans are automatically sexier than non-veterans in/after wartime may have greased the skids a bit.
LikeLike
Never heard of Lebensborn?
LikeLike
CH has his own filter. We all know what it is.
LikeLike
But, but, but, Hillary!!!
LikeLike
*Counter*-revolutionary, I assume you mean, CH.
LikeLike
Woman = life support system for a vagina.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah pretty much. Women are happiest when they are treated like property.
LikeLike
What’s the difference between a pussy and a cunt….?
A pussy is a pretty lil slippery pink thing you love sticking your dick in.
A cunt is what it’s attached to.
LikeLiked by 2 people
What’s the useless flesh around a vagina called? A woman.
LikeLike
“Women who aspire to leading roles in those insurgencies are suspect operatives”
cf. (((Luxemburg, Rosa))) and (((Goldman, Emma))).
LikeLike
Women can be evil in another way: (((Rozalia Salkind))),(((Bela Kun’s))) lover, was a personage of the CheKa in Odessa during Russia’s Civil War. She particularly liked to feed captured Cossack officers alive into furnaces.
LikeLike
The timeless wisdom of Ragnar Redbeard is fitting for this latest CH essay. From his book Might is Right (published in 1910):
“Conquersome personalities by obtaining possession of the best and handsomest females raise up as a rule, conquersome descendants, hence, the origin of Great Races. Second-class males are driven by necessity to mate with second-class females, and in strict sequence third-class males select partners from feminine remainders (hence the stereotyped nature of servile Castes).
“Superior males TAKE racially superior women, and inferior males are permitted to duplicate themselves, per media of inferior feminines….[etc.]”
And:
“Women take supreme delight in the roll of warlike drums, in the marching of the military, in reading the poems and romances of ‘battle, murder and sudden death ‘. Police Gazettes are mostly supported by women because of the sensational homicidal reports.
“French women (even against their deep patriotic sentimentalism) admired the fine physique and martial bearing of the German troops that poured through Paris in 1871. The contrast between the tall, clean-skinned German Conquerors and the dwarvishness of the French National Guards was then most strikingly displayed. In France all ‘brutal’ sports are prohibited. Clericalism there has had full sway for centuries and now majority-box socialism (also, cynical squalid sensualism) is all the rage.
“Wherever soldiers conquer in war they, also, conquer in love, after the paroxysm of revengeful patriotism is over. Women of vanquished races are usually very prone to wed with the men who have slaughtered their kindred in battle.”
LikeLiked by 3 people
Good find. The hamster is eternal.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Raglarp Larpbeard
LikeLiked by 1 person
Back in 1967, Stokely Carmichael (later known as Kwame Ture), head of the black radical Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (“SNCC”), said “the only position for women in SNCC is prone.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
As mentioned here by me and others numerous times, women are by Nature, attention whores. As such, throwing one in the front of a team, or a movement, where her ego clit is constantly being rubbed, and then threatening to remove (or actually removing) her from the spotlight, is too much to handle. The withdrawal will make her do just about anything, including selling out family and friends, to get back in the awarding power’s good graces.
LikeLiked by 2 people
They even let the sheeple know.
– Eavesdropping on housemates’ gossip, recording details about insurance policies and a bizarre obsession with the family dog –
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-7001397/Alexa-eavesdropped-familys-gossip-conversations-new-jobs-insurance-details.html
LikeLike
People are absolute fools to let that spy bot into their homes!!
LikeLiked by 4 people
The Gate Keeper.
” Facebook received a lot of attention for overt censorship last week. But the social network is engaging in covert suppression of independent media too — most recently with its introduction of “Click-Gap,” a way of favoring established websites and **** suppressing *** non-established ones. ”
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/05/07/click-gap-is-facebooks-latest-tool-to-favor-mainstream-media/
LikeLike
Every healthy woman yearns to be a muse for some man.
LikeLike
“Men don’t fight for land, or honors, or money, except insofar as those things earn them access to beautiful, young women.” As much as I love this blog I call bs to that. That is the equivalent to “Muh Dick” for everything.
I can get plenty of poon without starting or fighting in a revolution.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Civilized men need a purpose, and not just existence. Hence the drug epidemic facing many parts of the Nation, as men lose jobs (or have meaningless, empty jobs), in a Nation that no longer honors or respects them.
LikeLiked by 2 people
There’s no drug epidemic, there’s a drug shortage.
LikeLike
“Chicks to the front!” Chicago ’68.
LikeLike
“Chicks to the front!” Chicago ’68.
LikeLike
Right on cue, CH. Looks like Southern came up for air in between nogging just to tweet this:
Until EVERY white person sees themselves as complicit in white supremacy, nothing changes. Othering toxic whiteness is what keeps whiteness in place. There is nothing brave about white liberals tweeting their disdain for Trump. Start tweeting about your OWN white supremacy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I certainly see myself complicit in White supremacy and I am glad that I am so – and why wouldn’t I want to be complicit in my people remaining at the top of the food chain on this planet? I fail to see how White People being complicit in White supremacy is a bad thing.
LikeLiked by 4 people
We are supposed to feel guilty about being the supreme race on this planet for the last 2,500 years? I don’t think so. Most other races would LOVE to be able to claim just a tenth of what the White race has accomplished. It’s like the winner of a tough race looking to his (loser) competition and saying, “I am so sorry that I am better than you, and won this race. Here, take my trophy and race winnings. And please, f*ck my wife while you are at it.”
LikeLiked by 4 people
Lauren Southern? Damn that’s schizophrenic. Didn’t she just make that movie Borderless?
LikeLiked by 1 person
She’s a nogger shagging clucktardian dingbat. People who label themselves conservatives are usually just losers and are just the opposite side of the coin with libtard on the reverse.
LikeLike
looks like that was posted by somebody else
did she retweet it?
Until EVERY white person sees themselves as complicit in white supremacy, nothing changes. Othering toxic whiteness is what keeps whiteness in place. There is nothing brave about white liberals tweeting their disdain for Trump. Start tweeting about your OWN white supremacy.
— saira rao (@sairasameerarao) April 29, 2019
LikeLike
did she retweet it?
It would eliminate so much misunderstanding, if sensible people would quit posting snarky “I paid my taxes and debts. It’s so awesome having that ###HuwhytePrivilidge!!” bullshit, and just say “FOAD niggers”.
LikeLike
Yes, she retweeted it. Also down thread in her twitter, she blatantly states, “I am NOT White Nationalist…”
She makes the movies (100% betaboy funded) but wants that MSM attention. It’s too strong a pull. They do not understand the first and only basic principle of character- once you stand for something, you also stand for the exclusion of something else. And that carries a cost.
She doesn’t want any mean feelz.
I called this a long time ago (and took heat for it.) Do not give broads the microphone in our movement.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is worse than that
If you have some time to spare/lose
LikeLike
Also: Canadian. Do not underestimate the depths of their little-brother insecurities. It makes them into basket cases.
LikeLiked by 1 person
you can only shut them up with violence
anyone who’s lived with a woman long knows this
LikeLike
Men fight for sons. Women are an inconvenient speed bump. We’ll know this beyond argument after artificial wombs are joined to artificial women.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Never heard of Katie McHugh, thank God.
LikeLike
Nah, not just young, beautiful women. Because there are never, ever enough of the beautiful ones to go around. Men and boys fight for Beauty, which includes Fraternité and brotherhood with the fellow men of their tribe, and yes, the daughters and sisters of those men that they love and respect.
This site and so many other manosphere sites don’t get it: you leave behind the uglies, and you’re entire civilization is finished.
This site has NO plan for civilization, it’s stuck in a horny little boy’s world.
LikeLiked by 1 person
bbbbbut…bbbut….muh GAME man!
GAME Is the answer to every question!
Fuck FIGHTING, why not just GAME THEM?
If we need help with this we can just ask Transient about Fagstery’s book and borrow a feather boa!
LikeLike
True, but poorly said. If you could restrain the capslock and sarcasm and condescension, you’d be a force to reckon with. Your inability to stop screaming makes you easy to dismiss/scroll past/ignore.
LikeLike
Pelayo: best take so far
LikeLike
Copyright protections for the media class really need to be eliminated. You can’t legally ban what they say but you can stop them making a profit from it.
LikeLike
The McHugh saga reminds me of the war brides phenomenon described by Rollo.
https://therationalmale.com/2011/10/03/war-brides/
“Men are the disposable sex, women, the preserved sex. Men would simply die in favor of a superior aggressor, but women would be reserved for breeding. So it served a feminine imperative to evolve an ability to cut former emotional ties more readily (in favor of her new captor) and focus on a more self-important psychology – solipsism.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re boring me, let’s have some Boomer music
LikeLike
LikeLike
“There’s less than one percent of the population of Iowa that is African American. There is probably less than four or five percent that are minorities. What is in Washington? So look, it goes back to what you start off with, what you’re dealing with… When you have children coming from dysfunctional homes, when you have children coming from homes where there’s no books, where the mother from the time they’re born doesn’t talk to them – as opposed to the mother in Iowa who’s sitting out there and talks to them, the kid starts out with a 300 word larger vocabulary at age three. Half this education gap exists before the kid steps foot in the classroom.”
—Joe Biden, 2007
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3747963/posts
LikeLiked by 1 person
This reminds me of a joke: Chimpetta, a young Negress mother, is out walking in the ‘hood with her little toddler Travonious, and Travonious is running after her, crying “Mother! Mother!” Chimpetta beams proudly and says to her girlfriends, ” I is so proud of little Travonious! He already know half a word!”
LikeLike
In keeping with the Anathema theme. Busy Phillips admitted to having an abortion at 15. And did seem to be guilty at all. smh
Thank you for your strength in sharing your story, @BusyPhilipps. 💛 #BusyTonight pic.twitter.com/Ryqz7WGEVN
— Busy Tonight (@BusyTonightTV) May 8, 2019
LikeLike
“This is the way of an adulterous woman: She eats and wipes her mouth and says, ‘I’ve done nothing wrong.’
Prov 30:20
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed that the ideological front lines should be staffed by men. though let’s not forget that women do have an important role to play and must be included – however that role should be limited to helping inspire and lead other women to leave the globalist plantation. Our arguments, though effective, can only do so much, at some point a woman is needed to help other woman make that final leap, especially when thinking in terms of increasing scale.
Red Ice did an interview with Critical Condition recently. I have to admit I clicked not expecting much but was pleasantly surprised. If there is a role for women, the direction for a good model is probably to be found somewhere in that interview and this kind of female leadership should be encouraged.
LikeLike
LikeLike
McHugh’s “betrayal” is not that big of a deal. She was an alpha female (age 15-25) who bungled the inevitable transition into beta (old maid 25-35), and will become a complete basket case if she doesn’t square her shit away by omega (spinster 35+). She was misled by her orbiters. Where was her dad?
If she can’t attach herself to some semblance of manliness in these remaining years and discover her body’s purpose, she’s just another millennial fatality. This is more of a story about Alt-Right refugees, who found themselves in the same caravan escaping the poz, who thirsted over her rather than guiding her. Starting with Steve Bannon who certainly could have helped her transition. (Although, don’t underestimate a degenerating alpha female’s own neuroses contributing to the slide.)
I’m shocked, shocked to hear about such happenings at Breitbart! which spawned Ben Shapiro, who flamed out in his own spectacular white-knight gesture over a different alpha, Michelle Fields. The absolute state of the Alt Right. Some cuck, others LARP, they all peter out. There is no spiritual foundation to their enterprise.
LikeLike