Feed on
Posts
Comments

Poon Commandment VIII:

VIII. Say you’re sorry only when absolutely necessary

Do not say you’re sorry for every wrong thing you do. It is a posture of submission that no man should reflexively adopt, no matter how alpha he is. Apologizing increases the demand for more apologies. She will come to expect your contrition, like a cat expects its meal at a set time each day. And then your value will lower in her eyes. Instead, if you have done something wrong, you should acknowledge your guilt in a glancing way without resorting to the actual words “I’m sorry.” Pull the Bill Clinton maneuver and say “Mistakes were made” or tell her you “feel bad” about what you did. You are granted two freebie “I’m sorry”s for the life of your relationship; use them wisely.

Via Anatoly Karlin,

Politicians and other public figures often apologize after making controversial statements. While it is assumed that they are wise to do so, this proposition has yet to be tested empirically. There are reasons to believe that apologizing makes public figures appear weak and risk averse, which may make them less attractive as people and lead members of the public to want to punish them. This paper presents the results of an experiment where respondents were given two versions of two real-life controversies involving comments made by public figures. Approximately half of the participants read a story that made it appear as if the person had apologized, while the rest were led to believe that the individual stood firm. In the first experiment, involving Rand Paul and his comments on the Civil Rights Act, hearing that he was apologetic did not change whether respondents were less likely to vote for him. When presented with two versions of the controversy surrounding Larry Summers and his comments about women scientists and engineers, however, liberals and females were much more likely to say that he definitely or probably should have faced negative consequences for his statement when presented with his apology.

Mercy is a man thing.

The effects on other groups were smaller or neutral. Overall, the evidence suggests that when a prominent figure apologizes for a controversial statement, the public is either unaffected or becomes more likely to desire that the individual be punished.

***

Basically there is no reason to apologize regardless of the situation.

While the scandal may wreck your reputation or not as the case may be, you might as well avoid the self-abasement. Since it’s not going to do you any good anyway.

Not to mention that apologizing when you did nothing wrong is the action of a contemptible worm.

Never apologize to your enemies, and apologize to your woman (a reproductive enemy) only when absolutely necessary. Apologies demoralize your allies and embolden your enemies to slake their thirst for vengeance.

Repeal the 19th.

Women and liberals – by nature – favor the strong horse.

As Western White men are becoming weaker and the source of ridicule and demonization by a culture that has turned against them, their women are abandoning them for the (perceived) strong horse, even if that means the women have to invite the strong horse in through asylum and refugees rackets.

The evidence presented here suggests that seeing a public figure apologize either increases the desire to punish him or her, or has no effect at all. If this is the case, we may wonder why politicians do in fact so often ask for forgiveness in the face of controversy. It is possible that politicians apologize in order to receive better coverage from the media or even make a story go away. Political punditry can apparently affect voters’ preferences. In one experiment, individuals judging performances in a presidential debate were influenced by the nature of commentary they watched after the fact, when compared to a control group not exposed to the opinions of pundits (Fridkin et al. 2007). Likewise, if an individual apologizes for a comment that the media finds offensive, future coverage of that individual may be better than it otherwise would be. Such an argument requires the assumption that while members of the public are hostile or indifferent to those who apologize, members of the media will provide better coverage of an individual who shows repentance. Yet there is no reason to assume that this is the case, especially since most of the media leans to the left (Groseclose 2011: Groseclose and Milyo 2005), and liberals in this study appear to be those most likely to want to punish individuals for apologizing.

***

Nor does it seem that apologizing buys sympathy from the media.

Take a cue from Donald Trump, who at least has this down pat. Go on the attack. Flip the script. Agree and amplify. Basically do anything but apologize, because apologizing signals weakness, and weakness invites further attack.

Game can make American White men the strong horse again.

Why are liberals and women more likely to want to punish individuals for apologizing?

One, women are more liberal than are men, so there’s some overlap between the “liberal” and “women” categories.

Two, cruelty is a specialty of the effete. The weaker sex — and among liberals, both the men and women qualify as the weaker sex — run riot whenever they get the upper hand, because those moments of power don’t come every day for them. An enemy who has apologized is therefore a target to strip of all dignity and torture in the public square, because his apology vindicates the liberal’s moral self-regard and provides a rationale for the liberal to indulge virtue signaling status contests.

If the masculine is concerned with achievement, then the feminine is concerned with social status (i.e., credentialism), and apologies from enemies can be exploited to gain more social status for oneself among one’s shitlib peers.

And this is why it’s a mistake to turn over the governance and stewardship of a nation to women and soyboys.

Related, this study also supports Poon Commandment XI.

XI.  Be irrationally self-confident

No matter what your station in life, stride through the world without apology or excuse. It does not matter if objectively you are not the best man a woman can get; what matters is that you think and act like you are. Women have a dog’s instinct for uncovering weakness in men; don’t make it easy for them. Self-confidence, warranted or not, triggers submissive emotional responses in women. Irrational self-confidence will get you more pussy than rational defeatism.

306 Responses to “¡SCIENCE! Externally Validates CH Poon Commandment VIII”

  1. snarkwolf says:

    There is at least one major exception. Apologies for minor mishaps, NOT
    for your beliefs. You spill coffee, onion soup or RFNA on somebody, you sau OOPS. I am sorry.

    Like

    • dblr619 says:

      No.

      Reread article.

      Liked by 2 people

    • You spill coffee on her, you say “Let’s get you out of those wet clothes.”

      Liked by 8 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        ^^^^^It’s early, but that’s probably gonna be your thread winner right there.

        Like

      • ‘You spill coffee on her, you say “Let’s get you out of those wet clothes.”’ and into a dry Martini

        Liked by 2 people

      • atwood sux says:

        or she says “I was thinking about you today” and you say “Well that’s a coincidence……I was thinking about myself as well”

        Liked by 3 people

      • CalvinDecline says:

        “I was thinking about you today” and you say “Well that’s a coincidence……I was thinking about myself as well”

        Haha that reminds me of a truck driver I used to know. After I’d finish off loading his truck, we’d shoot the sh!t for a few minutes and then before he left he’d always say “welp! glad you got to see me!”

        Like

      • Greg Eliot Gay Son says:

        What if you spill the coffee on your grandma?

        Like

      • Dr.Benway says:

        You know that you’re never going to be drinking coffee with a female but do go on with your Walter Mitty fantasies about what you would say lol

        Liked by 1 person

    • King says:

      Exposing your vulnerabilities can be a bonding event, and it isn’t the same as spilling them all over the place because you’re an uncontrollable neurotic. The typical betamale apology is kneejerk and defensive because the sorry chump hopes it will distract from or neutralize his perceived shortcomings, which he fears are many. Meanwhile, he’s fooling nobody but himself. Yes, he is the kind of fellow who would benefit from the counsel to Stawp Apologizing — if only because it isn’t working.

      Sorcerygod demonstrated this cringey behavior a couple posts back, trying to ingratiate himself with a mawkish posture of humility so transparent it was pitiable. True humility doesn’t draw overt attention to one’s flaws, which is a kind of grandstanding, an indirect way to make everything all about oneself. Our friend Mendo is the best example of natural humility among us, which he demonstrates by finding good things to say even about those he disagrees with.

      Also, if there is strength behind your assertion, the content of that assertion doesn’t speak as loud as your presence (or tone or “frame”). The art of the apology is acknowledging a fuck-up without allowing it to define your character. Alphas are self-deprecating.

      Further, sincerity in our age of sarcasm is the contrast that indicates strength. Peacocking via earnestness.

      Liked by 5 people

    • Reinald Vallejo says:

      Oops or oh shit or noooo sarcastically is not really apologizing. It’s making light of the situation.

      Like

  2. Robert What? says:

    “Mercy is a man thing”

    So is empathy a man thing. Women can feel sympathy, but only (non-soyboy) men can feel empathy.

    Liked by 4 people

    • vfm#7634 says:

      Women can in fact feel empathy for a man in a difficult situation, but only if he refuses to show weakness, such as cry or otherwise wear his heart on his sleeve.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Shark Lasers says:

        Empathy is the ability to understand another person’s feelings from their frame of reference. Particularly where a man is reacting to a difficulty with stoic resolve, this is so far out of a woman’s wheelhouse you may as well be asking them to pee standing up.

        Liked by 3 people

    • Empathy occurs among equals. Sympathy, like charity and pity, flows from superior to inferior.

      Liked by 3 people

  3. There is also the effect apologizing has on yourself.

    You’re no longer a Genghis Khan.

    The inner world must have tall, steel-like pillars holding it up. Your personality — your essence — must stay strong. Every apology knocks one of your pillars down. Every knocked-down pillar jeopardizes your view of yourself in the world.

    Don’t even apologize to a woman for ANYTHING EVER. As for work, figure out ways to say “I take responsibility” rather than “sorry”.

    Liked by 8 people

    • dblr619 says:

      One of your better comments SG

      Like

    • Ironsides says:

      Damn, Sorcery, that’s actually kind of an impressive insight.

      Liked by 1 person

    • *sighs* Don’t worry about it going to my head, boys, I’m sure I’ll fuck up majorly with a near-to-next comment down the line and be smacked upside the head for that one.

      Like

    • King says:

      You’re no longer a Genghis Khan.

      You never were a Genghis Khan. You never will be, either.

      Alphas don’t LARP. Men don’t LARP. They have robust enough lives that the idea would never occur to them. Pretending yours is robust, and modeling your behavior on that play-pretend, not only yields fictional wisdom, it prevents you from getting a respectable life within a more modest reach.

      These grandiose lies you tell to yourself come with a price, Don Quixote. They make you ridiculous and a laughingstock and, worst of all, fatally self-unaware.

      Never was the cliched injunction to “Just Bee Yourself” more apt than in your case, if you take it to mean: stop ordering your life around fantastical superheroes of your imagination, even the ones modeled after real men in history. That’s not to say you shouldn’t dream big and plan big, but rather devote more of your attention to the task of staying grounded in reality lest you float off the planet, space cadet.

      If you need the legendary extremes of Genghis Khan as a guide to manliness, then you are starting from such an experiential deficit that you’ll never escape the comic-book phase. (Don’t get me started on the Marvel Superqueero omegamale takeover of the culture.)

      Liked by 1 person

      • Ironsides says:

        This is rich, coming from the tedious peasant who styles himself “King” while droning on through acres of self-righteous babble with apparently zero actual intelligence behind it.

        You didn’t back up your clown assertions about how beneficial the IOT is to everyone with concrete examples, you just threw evasive insults at anyone who questioned your inane conclusion.

        You didn’t put up.

        So it’s time to shut up.

        Begone, you patched fool.

        Liked by 1 person

      • King says:

        King is my name.

        And if you showed any inclination toward genuine communication rather than blowing off your hissy steam when I speak bluntly, I would have repeated my point for the fourth time in that other thread because you (willfully) missed the first three. I am patient with the slow, as long as they’re making an honest effort to understand. Your inability to discipline your emotions and focus on a difficult argument is nothing a thousand reiterations could overcome.

        Ponder for a minute why you can’t get over an already forgotten thread, which, like most others, ended in disagreement. Maybe there’s a scintilla of honesty inside you acknowledging your own contribution to the unresolved and unpleasant misunderstandings you find yourself involved in. Whereas I’m already over it.

        Long experience has demonstrated that there are 99 Ironsides competing in the Special Olympics of the Internet for every one contributor worth having an exchange with. It’s honestly hard keeping you I Am Sam‘s straight. But you have no problem remembering every slight that ever wounded you. The asymmetry makes me more memorable to you than you are to me, and there’s nothing I can do about that. You, on the other hand, can help our little predicament by improving your game and making it worth my while to engage you, assuming you have something substantive to contribute beyond unrequited, neverhealing butthurt.

        Like

      • johncorvus says:

        This is what insecure narcissism lacking any depth looks like. I would tell you to fuck off, but I think you’re really hitting your empty-headed pompous stride, and it’s good for lulz

        Like

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        fuck OFF dude

        the guy says something DECENT, RIGHT, and INSIGHTFUL and you fucking shit on him?

        You’re a piece of shit…drop dead

        Like

      • Jay in DC says:

        Not gonna light you up like travioli, but he is more right than wrong here.

        So in the spirit of Christ and your own self proclaimed magnanimity, take one for the team, and admit you went a bit too ‘hard’ here on saucyqueer.

        He was making a stylized / idealized point, not pounding his own chest about HIS inner Gengis Khan. Surely you have enough mental horsepower to deduce this. So the second half of your post was good, the first half comes off as a cheap shot.

        You man enough to walk it back ‘real alpha’ when other real alphas are pulling your card and telling you that you stepped across the line here? Just curious…

        Like

  4. CH: “your woman (a reproductive enemy)”

    Ouch.

    The dark-crimson of the Red Pill is turning Black.

    Like

    • bigjohn33 says:

      I don’t consider my woman my reproductive enemy. Yes, she has a vested interest in me not reproducing with other women but she can also gestate, birth, nurture, and protect my offspring from harm. A woman is only your reproductive enemy if she cannot give you 2.1 children and still demands exclusivity.

      Like

      • They’re the “enemy” because they resist reproduction – expensive eggs. Your woman is already yours so she’s conquered. This is why men, White men anyway, have a tendency – seen in the data above – to go easy on the conquered. It’s socio-sexually hardwired. Her submitting to you was the Nagasaki moment, only after which should Marshall Plan beneficence flow.

        All women will resist or at the very least make a show of resistance. All the way from higher brain function to the sexual id, resistance to a specific man’s affection/embrace/pelvic thrusts is hardwired. The 50 Shades stuff are full of *ahem* climaxes that describe the moment the woman “surrendered.”

        A woman is only not your reproductive enemy is the moment you are plowing her with reckless abandon.

        Liked by 1 person

      • King says:

        All women will resist or at the very least make a show of resistance.

        Big difference between resistance and making a show of resistance. Women “make a show” for the purpose of being overcome. It’s not true resistance, it’s an invitation to be conquered by inflaming a man’s will to conquer.

        Let me introduce you to a concept called, “Playing Hard to Get.” Hypergamy wants the strongest man with the most persistent essence, and putting up defenses is the surest way to attract and achieve that goal.

        Like

      • irishsavant says:

        With a man taking the ZFG approach and the woman playing hard to get the pelvic thrusts you refer to will surely be in short supply?

        Like

      • vfm#7634 says:

        @irishsavant

        Women also like to combine their resistance with a “boil the frog slowly” method over time if they like the man.

        Like

    • King says:

      Calling women a reproductive enemy is nonsensical. She can’t be both essential to success and its opponent at the same time.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Ironsides says:

        Did being this stupid come naturally to you, or did you have to cultivate it carefully over a period of years?

        Liked by 1 person

      • HoneyBear says:

        Double wrong on you King Tut-tut, because CH meant “opponent”. He said enemies to fit an oversimplified scheme of allies and enemies. Women are both. Which side you assign more weight to depends on your mood, or hers.

        A male and female pair are negotiation opponents in the mate market. If one’s value slips, the other gains power, and generally exploits it. It’s business with survival consequences.

        Semi-tangent: females’ decisions on who to deny life to in the next generation are just as consequential and brutal as males’ decisions on who to deny life to in the current generation.

        Negotiation and deals can be great fun for both. But a female can be head over heels for a man, and instantly change heart if he loses face. And men–ever see ugly in a girl you were dreamy about, and lose interest? Negotiation opponents. And she’ll feel like an enemy when she cheats on you. Oooh no, never on you, the alpha tut. But certainly on our civilization as a whole.

        Tut-tut!

        Like

      • King says:

        “Opponent” makes just as much sense as “enemy,” which is to say: none.

        A man’s opponents in the “māte market” are other men.

        Like

      • dblr619 says:

        The duplicity of women proves otherwise.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Lord of the Gulf Stream says:

        The War of the Sexes is a jew scam.

        Like

      • bolg says:

        let’s put it this way: a woman is the kind of enemy that thrives on being beaten into the ground

        Liked by 1 person

      • dblr619 says:

        Rather….fucd through the matress.

        Like

  5. Dylan Sexton says:

    off topic: what’s wrong with creating new races?

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Gee, I dunno, what’s wrong with exterminating existing races?

      Liked by 13 people

    • Southern WASP says:

      You can create new races if you want. I just don’t want them anywhere near mine.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Dylan Sexton says:

        that’s fair. every human should have the right to associate with whoever they please.

        what’s not fair is to declare (as CH does) that one’s own preference to be among (his (racial) definition of) their own kind is a moral superlative somehow. if he and anyone else wants that, then that’s fine and it should be respected. but it’s not a matter of right or wrong any more than preferring pineapple on pizza.

        Like

    • Alex the Goon says:

      Ask us later, if the next 6 heirs to the throne are in the same plane crash.
      A new race would necessarily be purebred, and kept isolated from the other races for centuries. What you’re [likely] talking about aren’t new races, just some more boring brands of mysterymeat that nobody wants to buy.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Dylan Sexton says:

        what’s it matter if nobody (you) don’t want to buy them?

        Like

      • vfm#7634 says:

        @Dylan Sexton

        Well, for starters, the mystery-meat individuals are robbed of the love of a natural in-group, and often end up gay (if male) or slutty (if female).

        Like

    • Corinth Arkadin says:

      One cannot create new races, only pervert the existing one through foul art.

      Liked by 2 people

    • King says:

      Brundlefly is Beautiful

      Like

    • What’s wrong with creating new racists?

      Liked by 2 people

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Oy, this Sexton shill yet again? Okay, let’s play…

      You can’t create new races from existing ones…

      … all you can do is dilute into a mishmash that is nothing more than a lighter shade of the lower form, and which identifies with said lower form, not something “new”.

      Or what did you have in mind, Yakub?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Dylan Sexton says:

        it’s a real shame that you think a person who disagrees with you is a shill.
        nonetheless…

        >You can’t create new races from existing ones…

        why not? were this true, considering we descend from common ancestry, how do you propose existing races were formed?

        >all you can do is dilute into a mishmash that is nothing more than a lighter shade of the lower form, and which identifies with said lower form, not something “new”.

        so if you found a mixed person who identified as mixed, or as one color, or the other, you’d change your mind?

        Like

      • dblr619 says:

        GE, do you know who bitch dis is….?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Alex the Goon says:

        it’s a real shame that you think a person who disagrees with you is a shill
        True, Greg, you’re painting all the hard-working, tax-paying, dedicated members of JIDF who support their wife and yids, with the same brush.
        Sometimes a shill is just some f@g.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Shills gonna shill… look, shill, it’s not the disagreement that makes you a shill, it’s the disingenuous fake innocent questions meant to scold RealTalkers for their “mean” ray-ciss thoughts.

        Don’t come ’round chere with your namby-pamby oh-my bullshit… the chateau merits a better calibre of apparatchik.

        You fairy.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Greg Eliot says:

        so if you found a mixed person who identified as mixed, or as one color, or the other, you’d change your mind?

        No mischling identifies as anything but a person of colour… and even if he or she WANTED to identify as White, it would be as ridiculous as Lizze Warren pounding her tom-tom as a feather duster redskin, or referring to Obama as the “first half-white president”.

        One drop rule, as a rule. No negro/White admixture looks like anything but a negro, the variations of which span from the color o’ deep molasses to high yeller.

        Now GTFO of here with your inanities. 😡

        Liked by 2 people

      • Dylan Sexton says:

        it’s interesting that you think i’m scolding you by questioning your ideas. wonder where i’ve seen that before…

        >No mischling identifies as anything but a person of colour

        that’s not true, they identify as mixed. this disproves your attempted refutation that hinges upon how mixed-race people identify. so, i ask again: what’s wrong with creating new races?

        Like

      • PA says:

        “what’s wrong with creating new races?”

        Theft of womb.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Let’s get something straight, dweeb… this isn’t about me personally, didn’t you get the memo?

        You weren’t addressing me with your race-mixing pap, but I was addressing you for your attempts to shill on the subject,

        You don’t think anything is wrong with race-mixing, then you don’t think anything is wrong with genocide of the White race, it’s that simple.

        Go over to Huffpo where you’ll find kindred souls… we doan need yo’ kind ’round chere.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        that’s not true, they identify as mixed. this disproves your attempted refutation that hinges upon how mixed-race people identify.

        Typical Cyberian Alinksy jew-jitsu. If you’re going to quote, quote the WHOLE point, namely:

        No mischling identifies as anything but a person of colour… and even if he or she WANTED to identify as White, it would be as ridiculous as Lizze Warren pounding her tom-tom as a feather duster redskin, or referring to Obama as the “first half-white president”.

        In short, and I’ll talk slower this time, it doesn’t matter what the nonWhite SAYS about their own identification, it’s what they actually do and how the rest of the world views them.

        But let’s play this one last time… name one mischling who identifies as White and is touted as such by the (((MSM)))… and I don’t mean some 1/1024th nigger in the woodpile, I mean someone with one White and one nonWhite parent, since we’re talking about actual race-mixing as the term is taken to mean in common parlance.

        And if you can did up one that we don’t laugh at for such presumptions of White, I’ll give you innumerable others that easily disprove your exceptions.

        In your world, Obama was just another White president? (((shakin’ mah haid))) All I heard was all and sundry giddy over our “first black president”.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Ironsides says:

        “Sometimes a shill is just some f@g.”

        Made me laugh out loud with that one, sir. 😉

        Like

    • bigjohn33 says:

      I don’t think there would be anything wrong with it necessarily, but it would be much more difficult than you think. Mixing races together and calling it a new race is stupid. Races don’t form by mixing. The opposite. Races form when groups of humans (or any organism for that matter) are genetically isolated from one another long enough that the groups’ evolution diverges as the process of natural selection selects for different traits in the groups. That how speciation works. Races are subspecies.

      If you wanted to genetically isolate a group of humans and breed differences into them naturally or artificially you could but it would take many many generations to develop a new distinguishable race of people.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Mick9 says:

        Compare Border collies to pitbulls, why would you want to mix them. You’d get a smart Tasmanian devil

        Liked by 2 people

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        we have CRISPR now…no it wouldn’t

        everything you people believe is coming to an end

        Like

      • Dylan Sexton says:

        that makes sense. i don’t think it’s a reason why mixing races wrong, though.

        Like

      • bigjohn33 says:

        Race mixing is wrong for different reasons. Hybridization destroys diversity. The problem is you can’t unmix races. Race mixing destroys in a single generation what took tens or hundreds of thousands of years to develop in nature. It is a tragedy and should be strongly discouraged.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Dr.Benway says:

        Races are not sub species.
        It’s only in the human species where we even use the word race. In other species we say variety or breed for any difference within the species.
        Humans today are a sub species of H sapiens called H sapiens(sapiens)

        Like

      • bigjohn33 says:

        Ok a sub-subspecies. Whatever. Race is a rank of biologic taxonomy and it doesn’t apply only to humans.

        Like

  6. Clemsnman says:

    The only thing dumber than the public apologies are the calls for public apologies when something controversial (i.e. true) is said.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Oleaginous Outrager says:

      Most public “apologies” are scripted garbage prepared by PR hacks and read like a school report by obviously lying fools. Even if apologies ever could work, these public ones never will.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Calling for public apologies is not dumb. It is an well thought out, intentional move by the puppet masters leading the Left. They have had many years of their special tribe members studying psychology and sociology, and no what buttons to push and triggers to pull.

      Like

  7. Captain Obvious says:

    Critic’s Attack on Health Minister of Belgium for Being Obese http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3747309/posts

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Game can make American White men the strong horse again.

    At an estimate, I would say only 25% of men are capable of attaining ANY proficiency at game, 10% would be sufficient to compete in the “Game Learned Charisma Olympics” and 2% would be real PUAs.

    It wouldn’t do to underestimate the incapacity of most men. When I was on a Bus riding into UBC campus in Vancouver, I talked to two different women, switching smoothly from one to the other. That wouldn’t even OCCUR to a guy. He’d give up after one failure. In fact, he’d give up on GAME after one failure. 99% perspiration, 1% inspiration, remember?

    Liked by 1 person

    • King says:

      American White men

      I was on a bus … in Vancouver

      You skated right past the crucial geographical component of his point, you maplefellating chillbilly pantywaist.

      Like

      • Jay in DC says:

        Damn ANOTHER one King? This is a very ugly / bad look for you. You have clearly AMOG’d on saucy and now you have to beat him down again?

        Not very Christ-like since you have already demonstrably proved you are the alpha and he is a poser. So why the try hard attacks? You hiding something nigga? Maybe not as alpha as you thought, innit?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Alas, the chateau has proven a bad influence on Christians!

        O tempora! O mores! O, vita dolorosa!

        Like

    • bolg says:

      i wouldn’t say 99% to 1% but you have a point

      Like

  9. The real test of game is if you can Daygame it, approaching a strange woman with calm and pleasure. I like doing it, partly because I like and enjoy meeting new and different people and partly because I know there’s a concrete payoff from doing so (mindblowing sex).

    The fear overwhelms the Thirst in most men, apparently *Sors shrugs*

    Like

    • dblr619 says:

      Daygame = +1

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        At this point, I don’t see how there’s any possible alternative Day Game – not if these hoz have private @rmies of 500+ beta-white-knights at their beck & call.

        Although Dr T is insistent that the chicks whom he’s encountering [from “Hinge”?] are demanding some sort of online authentication of you before they agree to offline sugar.

        I wonder what kinda success Dr T has with cold-opening Day Game in greater DC?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        alternative to Day Game

        Like

      • FastEddie says:

        @CO- anyone claiming greater than a 10% success rate of true daytime cold open is lying to you.

        Like

      • dblr619 says:

        Valid point.
        What would you put the percentage at for night game?(serious question)

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        >>>>> “a 10% success rate of true daytime cold open”

        I don’t do online, but what is the success rate there?

        Maybe 1/10th of 1 percent?

        [I honestly don’t know – I’m only being partially facetious…]

        Liked by 1 person

      • dblr619 says:

        Honestly CO online is such a shitshowwho cares?(No snark bro.)
        Go to any dating site and peruse the wasteland….its horrific.

        Liked by 1 person

      • FastEddie says:

        @db
        Even less than 10%, man (at least for me.) Significantly so. Phone numbers are almost worthless in that environment, though I do take them anyway if I can’t get her that night. I tell myself- well, you never know…

        @co
        Difficult to tell since it’s so easy to swipe you don’t keep track. Also, bumble doesn’t even show you chicks who swiped left on you.

        My problem with dating apps (again- my experience only) has been twofold. I don’t get the same age or quality I do irl. Flakes are absolute epidemics online. Ever so slightly less so irl.

        The disturbing trend however IS online.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        db, I’ll take your word for it.

        About all I know of online “dating” in 2019 consists of sh!t that either CH or Dr T poasts here.

        PS: Drove through the local j00niversititty today – yikes – waiting for the right time to poast about it.

        tl;dr == Confirmed that Kentucky chick from previous essay would be a solid HB7 at the local j00niversititty.

        It ain’t 1988 anymoar, muh boomer elders.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        >>>>> “The disturbing trend however IS online.”

        ?????

        The trend of flaking, or the encompassing trend of diminishing returns, or some other trend?

        Like

      • dblr619 says:

        All of the above and more.
        All the worst traits of wahmen on roids bro.
        OL is totally their home field.

        Like

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        I talk to chicks all the time in person.

        but I don’t usually move for a # because it’s so low percentage. I pick them up when i’m around them

        but I’m not browsing the fuckin mall during the day…day game…um…where? At the office? LOL…that’s a quick-tik to unemployment.

        I talk to random chicks on the street all the time but i don’t expect anything to go anywhere…chatted a chick up at the sandwich shop and was talking to her as we walked up the street…she did tell me she had a bf.

        I straight up say how you doing to random women passing by; many of them overtly ignore me. DC is full of ice qu33ns; been a known thing since an article in citypaper like 20+ years ago.

        The dudes I am around are always pretty stunned at my approach cadence and the balls I have…but it’s not as if you’re going to be swimming in tang hitting on bitches walking from their office to the deli and back on a short lunch break. Everyone here is “very” important, you know, and in such a hurry to get to soul cycle or orange theory or any of a number of stupid fucking things that they all do, or a binge watch or…something.

        Really…if i trusted “day game” to pick up pussy I’d be an incel like nearly everyone here.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Democritus says:

        @Captain Obvious

        “It ain’t 1988 anymoar, muh boomer elders.”

        Shit, it ain’t even nineteen-NINETY-eight anymore either, Gen Xers.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Just go to Pier One or similar, Target or a good supermarket. Get into a conversation about towels or socks or whatever.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Make up counters at nice department stores are another good spot. My sister wanted some mascara for her birthday…

        Liked by 2 people

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        so you guys CLEARLY do not actually pick up any women nor put any of your so-called advice to the test.

        To pick up chicks in a department store or a mall, you have to BE IN a department store or a mall. Meaning you have to spend precious TIME waiting around or shopping or god knows wtf I would be doing in a mall or a Target.

        I was looking for a burner phone airtime refill yesterday and was in a Target briefly…after a CVS. I did chat up a sick chick in the prescription line…if they’re there, yes I will talk to them and I will assess their receptiveness. A nice tits chick passed me in a target, I said something, she didn’t look up. I’ve hit on girls buying groceries with my kids…you name it. It’s fun and great for conquering any fear you have but don’t expect much out of it.

        this shit takes TIME. Time I do not want to waste on low percentage pickup moves. I am too busy doing all the shit that makes me awesome, so when I do get out with a chick I have something more to talk about than all the time I spend near the makeup counter looking for girls. If there was a hot girl in the store I bought lunch at, sure I would make a move…one Russian was clearly interested but then a hotter chick was behind me in the line and I had to make a swerve. Oh well.

        I don’t apportion the time in my life around women. If one wants to meet on a weeknight I clearly say I’m not available till 930 at earliest because I’m busy teaching jiu jitsu and/or kickboxing. Period. It’s a profession, not sacrificing that for a date with a bitch. I’m a man, not their convenience. Some of them drag their heels about this and it’s peace out. They want to do a happy hour after work, oh can’t you just skip a class? Hell no. They’re always asking you to skip your shit, your goals, your priorities for them. Bc they have a pussy. No.

        Sure, when you see a hot girl you’re thinkin man i wish I had made a move or whatever…but you gotta remember that the vast majority of times that move is going nowhere. It’s going to end up being a waste of time.

        And the realities are that for *my* life, OLD is the place to efficiently pick up pussies. Am I gonna meet a wife on there? It’s possible but unlikely; the same as whether I’m gonna meet her in a Target the one time in 6 months I’m in one for 5 minutes.

        Like

      • dblr619 says:

        EXCELLENT!
        Great spot for the neg too.

        Like

      • dblr619 says:

        It really is that easy.
        Much less threatening and more organic, this not triggering bitch shields.
        Also opportunity to neg on basket item(s)/tease.
        Only takes a modicum of social IQ to work this environment totally in your favor.
        Though same day lay is less likely, so is flaking.
        I have pulled more poon from stores….
        +1 for Danger

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I am too busy doing all the shit that makes me awesome,

        I bet you’re naturally deodorized.

        Liked by 1 person

      • dblr619 says:

        Fucn hilarious GE and accurate af.
        This baffoon just loves getting bitch slapped by its betters.

        Personally, I think dr travesty is an angry lesbo larping.

        Liked by 1 person

      • FastEddie says:

        “this shit takes TIME. Time I do not want to waste on low percentage pickup moves. I am too busy doing all the shit that makes me awesome, so when I do get out with a chick I have something more to talk about than all the time I spend near the makeup counter looking for girls. If there was a hot girl in the store I bought lunch at, sure I would make a move”

        Once again Travvy seems to prioritize his life similarly to mine. This is exactly the way I do it as well. Chicks pop up all the time as I am going about MY life. You see 5 or 6 every day you want to talk to, but it’s not always possible. I’m not going to run down the street to talk to a broad. Somewhere around 2 per day pop up.

        So you talk to 2 per day whether you’re at the grocery store, park (playing tennis or running), getting out of the gym and walking, etc. That’s 60 broads per month. You can expect phone numbers from about 25%. That’s 15 numbers.

        From there at least 3/4 will flake, not respond, be go nowhere dates, or fail your screening process for mud sharks, extreme libtards, etc. You’ll bang 10-20% of your numbers. That’s anywhere from 1-3 new broads per month, just going about your daily life. And that sounds about right. Not a bad return for just having fun, going about your life.

        Liked by 1 person

      • dblr619 says:

        You mean I should walk down the hill and fuc ’em all???

        Spot on FE

        Like

      • “They want to do a happy hour after work, oh can’t you just skip a class? Hell no. They’re always asking you to skip your shit, your goals, your priorities for them. Bc they have a pussy. No.”

        Good shit.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        N00bies should be forced to do algebra/probability quizzes on the numbers FE just poasted.

        60 openings per month; two or three b@ngs total.

        Q: How do you summon the energy to make it through all 60 each month?

        A: Zero. F*cks. Given.

        Q: And how do you get to the point where you don’t give a f*ck?

        A: You go to That Dark Place, and you STOP CARING.

        Once you no longer care, working your way through 60 per month becomes child’s play.

        It’ll be second nature to you.

        Like breathing or drinking water or pissing.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I actually go to those places. Publix supermarket is another good place. You don’t have to live there. Barnes and Noble is another good spot.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        If you can’t summon the courage to open on a lonely nerd geek sexy-librarian type with screaming batsh!t phucking b@bies-rabies emanating from her 0varies, then you need to go back to Square One and figure out WTF is wrong with yourself.

        PS: Dittoes with public libraries, private libraries [say hello to “The Huntington”, mendo], art galleries, classical music concerts, choral society concerts, wine tastings, etc etc etc.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        ^^^^^Regarding the sexy librarian types in the stacks at Barnes & Noble.

        Like

      • dblr619 says:

        AKA shit test

        Like

      • vfm#7634 says:

        @FastEddie

        Personally, I find that flaking is much lower if they see you a few times rather than just once. That way, in their mind, they “know” you.

        Like

  10. One of the things I’m going to start doing is approaching chicks who are walking around with another person who’s a guy.

    It may sound risky, but I have a feeling most of them are “friends” — and besides, I’m big enough to take careful of myself if I prove mistaken.

    Liked by 1 person

    • dblr619 says:

      “Do watch that if thou wish to continue on live, droogie.”

      Like

    • *shrugs* There’s always turning and running.

      I think it would be exciting on many levels. My theory is most guys walking with girls without PDAs are just loser beta orbiters. Just my theory. I’d be interested to see if it’s vindicated or not. *Sors feels a tingle of clarity in his thoughts and closes the comment*

      Like

    • antsnpeepee says:

      Dude, don’t bother them. That’s a man you might be annoying, and many of them also think they’re big enough to take care of themselves. Doesn’t matter how she responds; I’d rather leave a brother in peace than get his piece to leave. Even if they aren’t dating. Maybe especially if they’re not dating. Do you understand how miserable that orbiter probably is? Do you know the shit that cunt puts him through? “His fault.” Yeah, probably. But still.

      Just go for bitches who are alone.

      Liked by 1 person

      • John James R. says:

        Yeah, agreed. What a huge betrayal of a bro. Terrible idea. Good luck trying it on the next Eliot Roger who just happens to be on the first date of his life.

        Liked by 1 person

      • dblr619 says:

        Quite the conundrum bro…

        TOTALLY his fault and weak AF if that is the case.
        Also harder to find a situation that allows you to show that

        MUCH higher value so quick.

        Conversely, many here(me included)have put themselves in that situation and wouldn’t want to be on the receiving end of a pimp move on our oneitis.
        But could that emasculation be the wake up he NEEDS…?

        Last guy that tried that shit with me got a shot to the throat for disrespecting ME like that.
        It wasnt mate guarding or insecurity(I had a few plates so dgaf)I was truly incensed that he would try to punk me like that.

        Liked by 1 person

      • dblr619 says:

        “Doesn’t matter how she responds”
        Well….to the guy shes with it should!

        “I’d rather leave a brother in peace than get his piece to leave.”
        That’s pretty fucn solid right there.
        Man of honor….+1

        Liked by 1 person

      • Libertarian_Pill says:

        Shows again how men feel empathy. I doubt a woman would ever say or think anything remotely like that.

        Liked by 1 person

    • bolg says:

      there are many reasons to jizz on other mens’ property but humiliating them shouldn’t be a priority

      Like

  11. LB says:

    It is absolutely true that apologizing to enemies only gives them more power and will to crush you. NEVER apologize. Your enemy may still win, but at least you’ve maintained your dignity and live to battle another day.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Oleaginous Outrager says:

      Also avoid the fretful semi-apologetic ‘explaining’ many figures, public and private, often stoop to when under fire. It’s weakness squared.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Sorcerygod [www.future.code.blog] says:

      @LB

      This is true of political science as well.

      The King of France, when he began making half-hearted reforms just prior to the French Revolution, and Soviet Man Gorbachev, when he began opening a closed-up society, both got nailed to the Cross of Compromise. Pent-up pressure cannot be optimally released in those circumstances. There may be a way out but it isn’t that.

      Like

    • plumpjack says:

      “NEVER apologize. ..”

      Sun Tzu or Machiavelli might take issue with that.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Sorcerygod [www.future.code.blog] says:

        If you aim to manipulate someone, that’s an entirely different matter. Such as if you want to butter up a boss to get closer to him to plant the knife in his back.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        you’re getting to the heart of the matter there. if an apology is going to be a manipulation then it needs to be strategic.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        a more interesting SCIENCE! study would be when is “apologizing” a good strategy, and when is it not.

        I’ve issued a fair number of “apologies” in my life, but I can’t think of a single one that wasn’t strategic. even when I was six years old at my first confession I knew that it was sometimes just expedient to tell people what they wanted to hear so you could get on with your master plan.

        Like

      • This is one of those poon commandments that get the spergs tied up in a knot.

        Yes, you can apologize. But it’s a rare occasion and it takes the discernment of an experienced man to know when the apology is warranted (and thus of manipulative value.)

        Tl;dr: When in doubt, don’t.

        Liked by 1 person

      • dblr619 says:

        Good point.

        IF you are indeed advanced enough it can be a very strategic move.

        CH level game and above required though…..

        Like

      • King says:

        Machiavelli is the rabbi of the (((Enlightenment))) who wrote the step-by-step guide for the triumph of slave morality. Transaction uber alles, where manful fair-dealing is replaced by Shylock’s demand for a literal pound of flesh. Apolajoise? Oy vey! Vat’s in it for me?

        “Let your ‘yes’ mean ‘yes,’ and your ‘no’ mean ‘no.’ Anything more than this is from the evil one.”

        Niccolò was the first LARPer, who dressed in a toga and “conversed” with the ancients alone in his room. Not making that up.

        Like

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        I apologized to my ex once…was after I got put in jail for the shit that happened to me on that date with another girl.

        She loved me more afterwards, because I apologized like a man would. Blunt, direct, no appeal to feelings. Just I’m sorry, never meant for this, that’s it. Straight and to the point, raw and honest.

        Look her directly in the eyes- “I’m sorry.” Like the way you would tell her you love her in a deadly serious manner. You don’t flinch, you don’t shirk, you man the fuck up on it. People (esp women) respect those types of apologies.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Democritus says:

        “Sun Tzu or Machiavelli might take issue with that.”

        The figuration must fit the frame; however, Aesop trumps them both as echoed by Shakespeare:
        The ancient proverb will be well effected, –
        ‘A staff is quickly found to beat a dog.’
        2 Henry VI
        Act III, Scene 1

        NEVER apologize…to enemies.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        You have obviously read very little Machiavelli. That quote of yours was a metaphorical statement and is in the forward to the Prince. Read Florentine Histories. The man was anything but a LARPER.

        Like

  12. Oleaginous Outrager says:

    liberals and females

    A bit redundant, that.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. Looch El Sicario says:

    “Just be tall and hot.”

    -wolfie65

    Liked by 2 people

  14. These days, I prefer the term Bioleninism to liberalism.

    Liked by 2 people

  15. Passerby says:

    Females could be causing this effect among liberals, as there are more liberal females than males. You need to account for this effect.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. PA says:

    With people you deal with in good faith whom you had let down, or when you wronged any kind of an innocent party, it’s weasly and immature to not apologize simply and sincerely. That’s what you’d expect if the situation were reversed. But only apologize once. More than once is groveling.

    Like

    • With people you deal with in good faith

      It’s not a matter of good faith, it’s a matter of who has the most power in the two-way relationship.

      Apple doesn’t apologize to Foxconn when it delays payment till the last possible moment in the accounting cycle to make more money. Apple EMPHASIZES it holds the whip hand. Errors . . . if there be any . . . I doubt any apology is more than perfunctory.

      Like

      • King says:

        The spirit of Shylock animates your desiccated husk. The embezzled value shaved from the store of men’s creative labor is your golden calf. Profit marks the health of an enterprise, but worshiping Mammon is the perversion of cooperative efforts. Risking the integrity of those efforts for maximum shekelization is pure synagoguery — why settle for 10 extra when I can endanger everyone’s trust for the chance at 11!

        Apple doesn’t apologize to Foxconn because they are enterprises, not men. And the long separation of men from their enterprises is by (((design))), the better to keep honor miles away from the transaction so that the jew can; first, skim without detection; and ultimately, institutionalize their thievery as legitimate “facilitators of economic exchange.”

        Liked by 2 people

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        …says the fag who worships in a fag church with a heretical fag pope

        you worship in the company of demons

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jay in DC says:

        A’ight I’ll give you a pass on this one Kingy. There was a certain ‘merchant’ feel to the “I hold the shekels so fuck you” in this post.

        Men of honor who cooperate for battle (or business) should apologize and ‘man up’ when appropriate. I agree that this master / servant dynamic ‘he with the most toys wins’ has been a net negative for our as a society. It is also part & parcel of the way (((they))) do business.

        Like

      • Augustus says:

        Trav PhD. You really should be the last person on this forum trying to insult others and who they worship. You LITERALLY worship the Jew in the White Lab Coat™. You suck the cuck of the Jews in White Lab Coats™ who deliver to you theories(presented as facts to you and other idiots). You then go on the internet and berate anyone who goes against your beliefs. You call us heretics for questioning the religion of science, and you defend the Jew in the White Lab Coat™ to the last drop of s3m3n

        You’re either a jew, or a beta goyim acting on here like some Dbol/Tren/Deca/Test filled roider tough guy. Either way, don’t ever bring up religion and worship again. You Logos hating Retard.

        Liked by 1 person

    • dblr619 says:

      You can acknowledge your fuc up/take responsibility, so as not to be a d.b., and still not apologize.

      Like

      • plumpjack says:

        if a friend or relative let you stay at their house and you accidentally set it on fire, or someone lent you their classic car and you damaged it, or you injured someone through your negligence, then you would have to be a complete autist not to apologise.

        even if you don’t feel “bad” for inconveniencing them it’s still in your interest to lower your head out of apparent humility in order to preserve the relationship.

        but then again, you’re the guy who wants to get the “high score” so maybe social interactions don’t mean anything to you.

        Like

      • dblr619 says:

        Damn, STILL on your period hunny….?

        IF any of those EXTREME situations occurred then an apology most definitely would not suffice.
        Making it “right” would.

        Also, you argue like a woman.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “Also, you argue like a woman.”

        you need to apologise to the group for using such a weak insult. that’s just embarrassing.

        if you’re man enough to talk about killing people then you’re man enough to own up to using weak insults.

        come on now. on your knees. make it right.

        Liked by 1 person

      • dblr619 says:

        You’re a bitch, but you’re funny.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        stop LARPing you fucking faggot

        Like

      • dblr619 says:

        Rich af coming from you roid ranger.
        FAKE stud
        FAKE buff boi
        FAKE fighter
        FAKE intellect
        FAKE male

        You are moar bankrupt than any female I’ve ever encountered and you add NOTHING here.

        Like

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        I’ll let you know next time I’m in FL, bitch, we can put all this to the test

        let me know which part of the state you’re in

        Like

      • dblr619 says:

        Brevard Co fake tough guy.
        Gators love the taste of niggerlover.

        Your hormonal imbalance has rendered you incapable of seeing how fucn PATHETIC you are try hard Trina.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        ’ll let you know next time I’m in FL, bitch, we can put all this to the test

        let me know which part of the state you’re in

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jay in DC says:

        “Gators love the taste of niggerlover.”

        Dude… that shit had me ROLLING. Hilarious. Not taking sides in your pissing war but that was funny AF because… Florida Man.

        Liked by 2 people

      • bolg says:

        i love this place. really

        Liked by 2 people

    • “…people you deal with in good faith…”

      Serious question: Does a woman to whom you are romantically inclined fall under this category? I can grok an argument for both sides.

      Liked by 1 person

      • dblr619 says:

        Have been on both sides of that and have found it best not to.
        That IS NOT to say that I dont make it right in a manner I deem appropriate.
        I would rather pet a rabid pit bull while wearing underwear made of steak and kittens than show a woman weakness or vulnerability.

        Liked by 1 person

    • vfm#7634 says:

      Takeaway is privately apologizing to men is okay, but don’t bother with women.

      That’s one reason the Catholic Church insisted priests had to be men, since they have to hear confessions. Priestesses would wind up despising and hating their parishioners.

      Liked by 3 people

      • PA says:

        If your offense is public, then the apology has to be public too.

        An everyday example: you and your five buds are group texting. Light/fun stuff, busting each others’ balls. But you take it too far and get really nasty and personal with one of the guys for no reason. It won’t be enough to text him privately and say “sorry dude!” You have to text the entire group with “Sorry John, that was uncalled for. I take that back.”

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        >>>>> “Priestesses would wind up despising and hating their parishioners.”

        LOL’ed @ vfm with the epic profundity.

        Liked by 1 person

      • King says:

        “Sorry John, that was uncalled for. I take that back.”

        That formulation is too stilted to be an effective currency among friends. It sounds queer, uncanny.

        Men apologize to peers with gestures more than words. Jokey self-deprecation that acknowledges your mistake — which, incidentally, is in critical short supply on this forum — is the best way to remain consistent with the rapport and come across as genuine. It does require social artistry to pull off that trick, though, and not everybody is up to it.

        Laconic men aren’t afraid to say sorry so much as frustrated by their inability to express the right amount of contrition without lapsing into a vulnerable affect to everyone’s embarrassment. Often, it’s better for the aggrieved party to raise a bottle and declare, “We’re cool. (Even though you really are a dick.)”

        Come to think of it, only the harridan insists on the humiliation of being made to say the words. And you’re her bitch if you actually indulge her — which is why she emotionally blackmails you until you do.

        Like

      • Democritus says:

        @PA

        “If your offense is public, then the apology has to be public too.”

        It’s simpler to not act that way in the first place.

        Like

      • Democritus says:

        @PA

        It’s simpler to not act that way in the first place.

        Like

      • Democritus says:

        Redundancy thy name is mod

        Liked by 1 person

      • PA says:

        Matt King wrote that like someone who’se never had any friends but has a wealth of cliches about bro life. All theory, no hands-on.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Democritus says:

        I believe King is simply over-thinking it.

        Allow yourself to be good-naturedly jested with but, for the most part, try to avoid much joking about others that you either know or regularly come into contact with, friends or otherwise.

        Like

      • vfm#7634 says:

        “An everyday example: you and your five buds are group texting.”

        I consider what happens among a group of buddies “private”, but okay.

        Like

      • Augustus says:

        Apparently Matthew King, AKA “King” has been poking at commenters and site editors for years. I used trustly ol goolag and found his old post where he posted as “Matthew King” on “the rational male”, rollos site. As you’d expect, he sounds the same as he does now, and he is around 60 years old. A boomer, my “favorite”.

        I guess he sees himself as some sort of “savior” of “red-pill” men. My assumption is he wanted for red pill men to see the world through the light of God. fast forward from 2013 to 2019, his prayers are being answered. More and more “red pill” men are turning towards religion and the wisdom of the old, instead of seeing the world through the Lense of PUA.

        King, i like you as you are Catholic and have decent things to say. but please, know when to stop talking, especially if you’re trying to convince people. Everyone hated you at Rollos site, and most dislike you here now. People see you as Aristarchus’ alter religious ego.

        You sound like a smart man. Great, show us information and let it be. You come off like an asshole and your whole message is then ignored. Just advice my friend.

        -From a Fellow Catholic

        Liked by 2 people

      • bolg says:

        “… Men apologize to peers with gestures more than words….”

        if you humiliate someone *you care about* in front of other people *you care about*, it won’t be enough to make it right privately. you’ll need to show contrition in front of *said other people* to make sure the person you wronged *does not look like a bitch*.
        because if you make it right in private but the public doesn’t know about it, the wronged person would look like a bitch for not cutting your head off.

        Liked by 1 person

      • dblr619 says:

        “People see you as Aristarchus’ alter religious ego.”

        “…..and have decent things to say. but please, know when to stop talking….”

        “You sound like a smart man. Great, show us information and let it be. You come off like an asshole and your whole message is then ignored. Just advice my friend.”

        Spot on.

        And that is how to rebuke a fellow believer friends, well done bro.

        Like

  17. doyouwanttoseemyknob says:

    O/T Megan will get one more kid off Harry and take him for every penny.

    Liked by 3 people

  18. antsnpeepee says:

    Sorry? Sweetie, just because I did badly doesn’t mean I feel badly.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Truth-hammer says:

    Pop-culture reference:

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Morphine1 says:

    Meh. I guess I’ll take the contrarian stance here. And be vilified and mocked as a sackless omega eunuch.

    I find a quick, curt and concise apology, properly timed and deployed, to be quite tactical.

    I get off work late which makes me late meeting my girlfriend downtown for dinner. When I arrive she subtly but sourly notes my tardiness. I instantly say “I’m sorry, work ran late. Let’s get some potstickers and a couple of beers for an appetizer. How was your day?”

    As far as I’m concerned, my late arrival has been acknowledged, explained, and that topic is completely done. If she brings it up again I will calmly note that I have already apologized for it and will not do so again. Then another more pleasant topic will be brought up. “Did Alison have her baby yet?”

    If at that juncture she continues to dwell on my late arrival she will get a very frosty and pointed lesson on why she shouldn’t have continued to dwell on my late arrival. Along with an interrogation about whether or not she wants to continue the dinner date or maybe we should both just go home and maybe we can talk tomorrow.

    But it never comes to that. Anymore. It did once.

    Like

    • Like all things, congruence is the coin of the realm.

      Your “curt and concise apology” was more of an explanation than a bona fide apology. And given the situation, it’s par for the course.

      That you spoke the word “sorry” is more of a social grace than an admission of guilt.

      Sackless omega eunuch.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Where’s the fun in that?

      I was out banging your whore sister again. Where the fuck did you think I was? Now shut up and make me a sammich and if you’re good you may get some dick later.

      Liked by 1 person

  21. Matthew Alexander says:

    “Why are liberals and women more likely to want to punish individuals for apologizing?”

    Since apologies had no effect on men, it would seem that liberal women are driving the bloodthirsty results of liberals. If not, then we would have to conclude that non-liberal men, in order to balance out the results, actually improve their disposition towards those who apologize, which is a result that is not at all implausible.

    I would love to see the liberal results broken down by sex.

    Like

  22. (((Groupon))) depicting Whites as s1aves of ch!mpanzees:

    Like

  23. Max Rockatansky says:

    When the left howls for apologies from the right what they’re seeking is not an apology for what you did but for who you are. An extreme example is the self abasement of ‘acknowleging’ slavery by having white elementary school kids walked like dogs by the black students.
    On the corporate side I think the template most PR or crisis management operators use is sonething like 1. acknowledge wrongdoing quickly to get in front of the issue 2. describe how it could have been better handled, 3. explain how situation has been rectified for the future and affirm commitment to blah blah blah.
    On the personal level, a sorry for a daily inconvenience is rarely an apology per se but a social lubricant. For a major transgression, it will only take you backwards so you have to elicit clemency in other ways to let the other party justify your error.

    Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      The left views apologies as a confession of guilt and a green light for feasting on the apologizer’s corpse.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        yes it’s a jewish thing…they want to debase you

        it works really well on cuckstians who have a progenitor who they debased the hell out of…you really can learn from the bible!

        Liked by 2 people

      • Greg Eliot says:

        With try-hard, it’s all about debase.

        At least our progenitor didn’t bark.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Lord of the Gulf Stream says:

        Jesus never apologized for anything.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Lord of the Gulf Stream says:

        Christ never apologized.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Christ never had anything to apologize for, though the Sanhedrin often tried their Alinsky shaming gambits on Him.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        he carried his own torture stake up a hill while they beat the fuck out of him and ridiculed him

        he was debased in every way imaginable.

        that’s your role model, go and do likewise

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Debased in every way imaginable by Man…

        … and through His obedience to God’s Will and Plan, raised in glory for Time Eternal.

        Hebrews 2:10
        For it was fitting that he, for whom and by whom all things exist, in bringing many sons to glory, should make the founder of their salvation perfect through suffering.

        Bet (((they))) didn’t tell ya THAT on your Masada tour!

        Like

  24. Regular John says:

    Among the savage native Indians, the women were known as the most enthusiastic torturers of defeated captives.

    Liked by 2 people

  25. A direct parallel of the SJW spiral we are in can be seen in the Cultural Revolution that convulsed the PRC a few cycles ago. From the tearing down of monuments and abasement of the White traditions/heroes – a carbon copy of the campaign against the Four Olds – to the calls for ritual, public apology – a carbon copy of the Struggle Session – we are in the midst of a very specific Maoist revolution. People talk about Alinsky but he was just a tactician. To understand where we are now and where we are heading looking no further than the Cultural Revolution.

    Where it will get spicy is that in China, the class enemies were disarmed and crippled by Confucian subservience.

    Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      The USA Today article states, “The series has never been good at developing its characters of color and their cultures, as it has with white characters.” That is because in fiction, as in real life, “people of color” (and here, we clearly mean blacks, as there are no Orientals seen in GoT), have no ‘cultures’ worthy of appreciation. They come from shitty low-tech/low-IQ nations, with shitty religions, shitty customs, and shitty people. What is there for a higher, more advanced race to really appreciate?

      Liked by 1 person

  26. Aeoli Pera says:

    Excellent post.

    Like

  27. PA says:

    Sometimes you create a situation where you have to apologize to your girl. She’s a nice girl, not a cunt. You were a dick. Here is how you do it.

    Have the video below ready, paused on 2:14. Say that you have something to tell her, then press Play. And then you stop it on 2:27.

    Like

    • Alex the Goon says:

      Dude sounds like a lady.

      Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Probably buried under them after every show though.

        Like

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        there’s a russian vocal coach who listens to him do a version live and she nearly cums when he goes up there

        i used to have that range and more till i hit fucking 40…getting old sucks

        Like

    • Dr. trav777 says:

      so when you’re alpha you can get away with shit like this.

      getting down on your knees and begging a girl when you’re alpha is powerful and makes them wet. singing shit like this makes them wet.

      it’s just “be tom brady.”

      An apology done like a man makes them wet. Vulnerability from an alpha is a special thing…you show them your heart and they feel closer to you…it’s not seen as weakness in the sense that weakness would be unattractive.

      every hero in fiction has their vulnerability- it’s what makes them heros and why “superman” characters are uninspiring…bc they’re boringly perfect. alpha emotion makes chicks wet, beta emotion turns them off

      Liked by 1 person

  28. JB says:

    Flip the script. Tell her she’s the reason you’re being like this…

    Like

  29. The Postman says:

    Case in point last week:

    • Soyboi school board president innocently says “tar baby” at annual teacher’s banquet

    • Apologizes profusely when fellow progs [inevitably] take offense

    • Apology rendered feckless as they throw him to the wolves

    • Soyboi resigns/mob wins

    https://www.sentinelcolorado.com/news/metro/cherry-creek-school-board-president-resigns-amidst-controversy-over-tar-baby-comment/

    Like

    • Moses says:

      The idiot should not have apologized.

      An apology in a case like this is an admission of guilt.

      In what universe have you EVER seen SJWs demand an apology, get it then say “No worries, let’s forget about it.”

      Yeah me neither.

      Apologizing to SJWs is like throwing gasoline on a fire. They will use it to destroy you.

      Read “SJWs Always Lie” by Vox Day.

      Never, ever apologize to a SJW.

      Liked by 1 person

  30. Dylan Sexton says:

    what about when you do something wrong? it’s only right to make amends.

    Like

  31. Captain Obvious says:

    We Wuz Kangz n Sh!t @ the Metropolitan Museum of Art http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3747349/posts

    Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Soooooo…..

      Even though the Old Kingdom pharaohs, and many New Kingdom pharaohs, were clearly of the Aryan race….

      These black “We was Kangz” Egyptian pharaoh larpers need to be asked three simple questions:
      “So, blacks were pharaohs in Egypt?” (A: “Yeah, man! We was Kangz!”)
      “And you are proud of that?” (A: “Yeah, damn proud!”)
      “So, you’re cool with slavery then, right?” (A: “Errrrrrrrrr….f*ck you, whitey!”)

      Liked by 1 person

  32. Stallman says:

    Saying “Sorry” when you’re an adult sounds like you’re a silly nanny and try to run AWAY from your problems as quickly as they happen.

    My hard chest turned to mushy tits just writing this post. Fuck.

    Like

  33. Stallman says:

    Men who don’t do pushups apologize to women.

    Liked by 2 people

  34. info says:

    “Never apologize to your enemies, and apologize to your woman (a reproductive enemy) only when absolutely necessary. Apologies demoralize your allies and embolden your enemies to slake their thirst for vengeance.”

    That characteristic of liberals can be exploited in a feigned retreat in which they are guaranteed to bite the bait falling into self-destruction.

    Although as in battle and in real life. That requires very,very good discipline.

    Like

  35. Cracker says:

    this reminds me that’s it’s important to remember the opposite is true for women

    if your girl is not routinely saying sorry when she screws up, you’ve got a serious problem.

    she either doesn’t respect you or she’s a shiz girl who doesn’t know how to own up to her shiz, and/or she’s a man hater who thinks she above showing humility to a man

    no matter what the reason, if she isn’t apologizing profusely and trying to earn back your favor when she screws up, it’s a big red flag

    Liked by 3 people

    • Cracker says:

      to add to this

      if her default behavior is arguing or trying to flip the frame by saying you hurt her feelings when you call her out on shiz. that’s an even bigger red flag. that shows all of the above plus she’s being a royal pain in the ass on top of it. keep chicks like that around at your own peril. you’ve been warned.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Carlos Danger says:

      That has been my experience too. The ones who are like that look up to you, which is what all women want ultimately. Its a great tell she sees you as the best she can get. Reasonable jealousy is another trait to seek as long as it doesn’t get out of hand.

      Liked by 1 person

  36. cortesar says:

    lolz clown world is an endlessly amusing shithole

    Ah Britain pic.twitter.com/LmvcGduvg9

    — Orwell & Goode (@OrwellNGoode) May 5, 2019

    Liked by 2 people

  37. cortesar says:

    now this is not amusing but fortunately we know that the orange clown is monitoring the situation lolzzzzzzzzzzzz

    What did they mean by this? pic.twitter.com/uRxIw9vgyz

    — Orwell & Goode (@OrwellNGoode) May 3, 2019

    Liked by 1 person

    • Johnny Redux says:

      The world as we know it should, and will, end in the next 5 years. The wrath of Nature shall fall upon us. We were shown the way to a better future, to be the higher men and women that we were intended to be, but we refused to head the calling, and ignore the signs, time and time again, instead following false leaders and elites who let greed, apathy and weakness twist and pervert their judgment.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        i just fucked a gen Z chick, 19…she said she thought they would be the last generation

        Like

      • vfm#7634 says:

        So Trav is into chinks, negresses, and now retards… nice

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        BOOM… roasted!

        Liked by 1 person

      • mendo says:

        retards, negresses, chinks, oh my!
        retards, negresses, chinks, oh my!
        retards, negresses, chinks, oh my!

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        September 23 is the second anniversary. About 22 more months of relative normality and as you said, another five years or so.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Mendo that made me snort while I laughed, Great joke.

        Like

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        no VFM, I wasn’t fucking your sister

        Like

      • Jay in DC says:

        Well… somewhat to travioli’s defense, have you ever SPOKEN to your average 19 yo? Or anyone under about 25 in fact? Through decades of dysgenics, social media, iphags, and sk00l indoctrination they are actually borderline retards for the most part.

        We are regressing in IQ and this has been statistically proven. I had very little use for wahmen outside of banging a decade ago. Today? Holy crap. Shutup and open your legs… they are literal front holes with no ability to carry on rational thought, speak, or do anything of any substance other than take a couple spurts of nut. Entirely fucking useless.

        Liked by 1 person

      • PA says:

        “they are actually borderline retards for the most part”

        I came to an opposite judgment.

        That 19 year old girl’s attitude strikes me as profoundly attuned to the spirit of the time. Young people normally see themselves as the First Generation (for one, they invented sex), not as the last generation. It’s tragic.

        If her attitude is representative of her generation, then that generation is awake to an End Of Times dynamic. Note, that that is not a new thing under the sun. The Catastrophists literary movement of early 20th century in its time and place blah blah picking up on the coming upheaval.

        Like

      • vfm#7634 says:

        19 y.o. girls don’t wax philosophical. They may try, but they almost always simply parrot the broader shitgeist.

        She is either totally nihilistic, or a complete airhead. Both would nicely explain why she gave herself to Try-Hard Trav in the first place.

        Like

    • Alex the Goon says:

      He’s flying the First Daughter over to twerk a peace-dance, to show them not all White Devils are bad.

      Liked by 2 people

  38. cortesar says:

    As we said many times, it was only a question of tome when the degenerate central would start promoting incest

    p.s check this tweeter account
    It is an unbelievable compilation of the degenerate anti -white clown world
    I thought I saw most of it last few years but this is another level of insanity

    Peak Guardian doesn’t exist; it’s merely an abstraction whose boundaries constantly surpass our understanding. pic.twitter.com/J0HWSkCtyP

    — Orwell & Goode (@OrwellNGoode) May 7, 2019

    Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Dear Mr. Sexual Dreamer from the The Guardian Story:

      I have a strange, hidden sexual fantasy too!! I’m embarrassed to share with anyone, but I will with you, because I think that you are special, and well, I think I love you. It’s of you in a warm bubble bath, surrounded by beautiful lit scented candles, and a soft music playing in the background, and of you……killing yourself. Remember to cut longways though, not across. Don’t deny me of my passions, sexy! I’m counting on you!

      XOXOX,

      Johnny

      Like

    • Jay in DC says:

      I know you posted this just for the degeneracy angle, but there is a MUCH darker and more sinister piece here.

      This chick having the sex dreams about daddy & bro by her own description says- ” My dreams are quite vivid and I often believe they are real until I wake up.” and then goes on by how disgusted she is upon waking up and finding out is her own twisted Id that is causing the dreams. This instills major cogdis.

      How to get rid of it? Go to a therapist a few years later. Realize these were NOT dreams but ‘repressed memories’ and have a ‘recalled memories’ session. Once you are done, call 911, and report a 10 year old rape by daddy and bro. Have daddy & bro scooped up by the gun wielding badge gang for doing absolutely nothing wrong other than having a psycho bitch for a sister / daughter in the family.

      Now daddy & bro have been arrested, jailed, and even if found innocent their lives are shattered apart permanently. And this is why you have to open the neck of certain people pre-emptively. Because to allow them to roam free puts you in extraordinary danger.

      Does my theoretical story seem far fetched in the wake of the Kavanaugh “trial” or any other ridiculous rape claim for 10-20 years ago? In the gynarcho-tyranny with the power of the State behind them to jail you on a whim these are the most dangerous motherfuckers stalking about and you have almost no defense against them should they decide to go full retard on you.

      Liked by 1 person

      • cortesar says:

        Nothing is far fetched in the clown world
        That is why I posted these. Boundaries are shifted daily, the lunacy of yesterday looks like normalcy of today, what was sane 5 years ago nobody remembers any longer
        This is done by design as a conserted effort to transform human lives in a speed race
        Human unconscious desire to forget says Kundera in Slowness is directly proportional to speed while human effort to remember is proportional to slowness. That is why a man slwows down when he wants to remember something, that is why he quickens the pace when he wants to forget troubles of everyday life
        Human identity and the one of nations is based on the rememberance of things past, make today into a frenetic chase, yesterday will disappear but so will tomorrow

        Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        I know of this happening (not to me personally) and can attest that it is indeed real and happening. there are a lot of parallels between “therapy” and brainwashing and/or hypnosis.

        the upshot is that female malleability is available for all takers. Anglin touched on this a few weeks back. I forget which article it was. basically he said that imagine what we can convince women to believe once we control the narrative.

        that’s really the most productive conversation we could be having here. not, “OMG it’s so terrible what they’re doing to us” but rather “how do we flip this bitch so that we’re the spell-weavers?”

        Liked by 1 person

      • PA says:

        “how do we flip this bitch so that we’re the spell-weavers?”

        Western men did that collectively c. 2004 – 2009 when we went on the offensive with red pill propaganda to win the culture. It was new and exhilarating to uncover old truths. Then in 2015 – 2016 we campaigned for Trump to seize control of the government. Right now we’re in a low. Clown world. Some despair. Refractory period after which there we’ll make another offensive. Past setbacks are the plat that was cut but the roots are alive. Eventually our offensive will break through the enemy’s line.

        Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        “Right now we’re in a low.” maybe “lull” is a better word here. we haven’t reverted back to where we were. seems like we’re holding ground, even as our enemies step up the attacks.

        the attacks are actually good. the broader the attacks the more normies will get strafed and seek shelter in the ranks of the sane.

        “Eventually our offensive will break through the enemy’s line.”

        agree. I believe the death of the old (((order))) is baked into the cake. however, new technologies are in the pipeline that will be huge force multipliers for both sides, so I would not expect this cosmic fight to end any time in the next billion years.

        I also do not expect that time will suddenly start running backwards and that we will return to some condition in the past that no longer exists. it’s forward or die.

        ain’t no brakes on this darwinian train.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        Refractory period after which there we’ll make another offensive.

        Brilliant!

        Liked by 1 person

  39. mendo says:

    Love wins!

    Like

  40. Mr. Roboto says:

    lolzlzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Like

    • Dr. trav777 says:

      jfc…i’m 47 and single and my place looks like a clean room compared to hers…wtf

      Like

      • PA says:

        Frathouses smell like stale beer but they’re neat inside. Sorority houses smell like flower petals but are an unholy mess of stuff lying around everywhere.

        Like

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        oh lol…an argentine jew…I made out with one of those around that same age probably when I was in Israel. Went on a masada tour and ended up being the only non spanish speaker in the group, though I do speak enough. Bitch had a hairy bush tho

        tons of jews at this age are single in this country, esp here in dc…place is littered with them

        jews aren’t reproducing; they too will be swept away before long

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Went on a masada tour…

        With your church group?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jay in DC says:

        “Bitch had a hairy bush tho”

        Jew chicks are very hirsute this is a known thing. Also anyone darker complected in general this will be the case so a latina? jew is going to be a particularly hairy beast I’m guessing.

        I am ok w/ bush actually though. I am thoroughly exhausted of the 10 yo girl bald p00sy that is 95% of every women in the West circa 2019. Boring.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        Something sexy about a well groomed bush. Few years ago, a tasteful photo was posted on here showing a nice patch of grass.

        A nice inverted triangle directing to the point of entry is my flavor

        Like

    • Greg Eliot Gay Son says:

      She’s an assistant director! She lives for her work!

      Like

  41. Greg Eliot says:

    As of the current year, Satan has yet to apologize for anything.

    Alpha as fuck, he be… even still snarks at Michael, who once kicked his ass.

    Liked by 2 people

  42. farmlegend says:

    It seems, from his occasional remarks, that Limbaugh regrets the public apology he made to the slut Sandra Fluke. The apology got him nothing. I doubt if he ever does anything like that again.

    A teaching moment for the right. NEVER apologize.

    Like

    • Mr Meener says:

      limpballs is a fat POS drug addict and servant of pissrael. all he has been talking about is Barr and the attacks on him which is perfect cover for rabbi trumps wide open borders. not one word spoken on the invasion

      Like

  43. Black Bull says:

    “Sorry” can be construed as an acceptance of liability in a civil action, or as an admission of guilt in a criminal prosecution.

    Never say sorry…unless (having lost the case) to mitigate a sentence.

    Like

  44. dpotter says:

    This post reminds me of Holistic Game. When they were caught for mating and writing about it on their blog (women are always shocked to learn the 1-10 scale is real), the HG guys wrote essay-length apologies. Then they got destroyed as the feminists blew off the contrition and demanded more. HG had to shut down their coffee shop. Sad because they were a lighthouse in Asheville’s sea of soy. I miss those guys. Their blog was gold. They made a real contribution to game.

    Like

  45. cortesar says:

    pic.twitter.com/lRj0DIbYO7

    — Ares Vicious (@ViciousAres) May 7, 2019

    Like

  46. Berglander says:

    Bish bettah susskkkribuh to PewDiePie

    Like

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion