Feed on
Posts
Comments

A sufficiently robust self-abasement is indistinguishable from depravity. Case in point: this man who is seriously contemplating an agreement with his wife which would sanction her desire to have a “more attractive” baby with another man’s seed and which her openly cuckolded husband would raise as his own under penalty of law and his wife’s death-glare.

Wife [26F] wants to use a sperm donor because she wants attractive kids

I [30M] have been to my wits end with this discussion and I don’t feel comfortable talking to my family or friends about this due to the sensitive and embarrassing nature of the conversation.

So many embarrassing situations can be avoided by being a man.

When talking about children (we want to start soon), she suggested a sperm donor because then the child will (supposedly) have a better chance at a good life. I was incredibly confused and asked her to explain. To which she explained that if the baby had genes of an incredibly attractive and smart man (tried not to be insulted at that) then he/she would live an easier life and be happier. She’s not wrong in that more attractive people live life easy, but its just so hurtful to think that your wife doesn’t think you’re good enough to have children with.

Why did she marry him? Regardless, her (and his) presumption is undercut by the hardships that will befall beautiful bastard sprogs who are abandoned by nonbiological fathers or, at best, resented by those non-fathers until they crack one day and go the full Elliot Rodger/Amanjaw Mancuntte.

Before we got married (been married for 3 years), we mentioned our mutual interest in having kids but this never came up. If I’m being objective, my wife is incredibly smart but not jaw-dropping beautiful

This is why you should ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS commit to a woman for her looks first, and her smarts a distant second.

and though she has a healthy fit body, her face is not perfect.

Butterfaces are cursed to have the bodies that arouse alpha males for a night, but the faces that scare them away for the rest of the days and nights.

She is imperfectly perfect to me but she’s only a solid 6/7. I think her own insecurity might in part play a role since she struggled with not being a beautiful woman in her younger days and said how life is easier to be good looking.

For women especially, it sure is. But life is not easier as a single mommy. Remind her of that. Watch her reaction. Grab the popcorn. And get ready for an evening of sex you haven’t had with her since…ever.

I’m around the same level of attractiveness (I’m 6’0 and kinda on the thinner side but my face is average id say…never had anyone be repulsed) as her and she is attracted to me but she says she just wants our kid to have the best shot at life and lead the best life it can.

This is like the IMAX showing of Alpha Fux, Beta Bux. We’re immersed in it. Blink when you leave the theater to get your sight back.

I don’t know what to do. Its gotten to the point where now I’m starting to consider it,

Second biggest mistake. (First big mistake was marrying her.)

but it would make me feel as though she married me just for the money I can provide in raising this other handsome man’s child.

Whenever there is any doubt, there’s no doubt.

I don’t know what to do or how to reach her that this is not ok.

Try this:

“No”

Then this:

“No, you dumb crazy bitch.”

Then this:

“You don’t have to beg for my pimp hand, you can just ask.”

Finally, if those fail, this:

“There’s the door. Bye.”

Divorce is NOT on the cards; I just want to fix the problem.

Congratulations, you just gave up your only last ditch leverage.

Update: I just casually asked her if she would be ok with using a sperm donor and egg donor and she pretty much shut that down real fast.

How utterly surprising! /s

Nothing pisses off a woman more than an uppity beta going against character and daring to look out for his own interests, but doing so in the most mealy-mouthed, tentative way possible.

She says that at least one of us need to be biologically related to the child and its better if the mother is because the baby grows inside the mother and we could be involved in the pregnancy.

Thanks for the medical report.

This beta male on the cusp of omegadom is sadly representative of so many weak Millennial males who have NO CONCEPTION of the right and proper way to lead, dominate, and romantically possess women.

HE IS PREY.

His pathetic weakness provokes predatory behavior from women.

The only blood women can smell better than their own monthly is the blood of beta chum.

A reader is flabbergasted,

Stuff like this hurts to read, it’s inconceivable to me that someone would tolerate this from his (or supposedly his) woman. How did he even get a woman? Must have been a big bank account.

The man who would tolerate this shit from a woman is the man women would cuckold.

Don’t tolerate it, and women won’t gallingly solicit your acquiescence to your Darwinian annihilation.

My advice to this man is simple, but requires a small measure of dignity, which means it will be ignored or dismissed as “misogyny”.

Do not walk to your nearest divorce lawyer. Run. And do it under cover of night. Plan your legal disentanglement now, while she’s blind to your tactical maneuvers. You want to catch her by surprise, and you want an ironclad divorce settlement that leaves her nothing (luckily no kids are involved….yet) but an empty feeling in the pit of her butterwomb. Secretly record her cuckoldry discussions with you to present as evidence to the court. If all goes well, she’ll be paying you to leave her alone and miserable.

And don’t for a second think this marriage is salvageable. The moment your wifey articulated her desire to shun your seed and profit from your toil was the date-picked stamp on your inevitable divorce. When a woman speaks openly of her hypergamy, you can bet she’s been thinking silently of it for years. A woman in that state of mind is one flimsy excuse away from cheating on you soon enough. Even if she drops her ridiculous demand of you to self-cuck, she’ll simmer with the resentment of a woman who has, for years on end, wanted to jump on interloper dick and get impregnated by a higher quality man. Stay in that marriage only if you eagerly await the day you find the damning sexts on her phone.

Oh, and stop voting for elitist Democrats and cucked Repubs. I can bet you’re the type of sniveling beta boob who votes for politicians who hate your kind.

A Test Of Your Game Knowledge

Is this an example of…

Carlson/Kobach 2024

Or, if things go badly for Trump over the next two years, Carlson/Kobach 2020.

Tucker Carlson, like the rest of us, is frustrated with the pace of MAGA.

He blames Trump.

I blame the system.

Tucker doesn’t seem to grasp the bind Trump is in. Imagine every day you had to deal with innuendo of impending indictments of your family members. And two parties which hate you. Judges which thwart you. And even your “allies” balk at your style.

Every step of the way, the goal of the establishment has been to hobble Trump, to prevent him from keeping his campaign promises, and to cripple his ability to get even minor executive orders past a black robed terrorist.
Trump isn’t capable?
Maybe.
But an honest man would admit Trump’s enemies have made sure he doesn’t get the chance to prove his worth.

From Heather,

I agree with you.

But hear me out on a little speculation… Everyone knows Trump watches Tucker. Could this be Tucker’s way of cutting through the awful advisers and telling Trump directly that if he doesn’t get the wall going, he’s toast? Lord knows if he met with him or called him everyone would know about it.

What do you think?

No doubt this is in the back of Carlson’s mind, and may even be at the forefront of his mind. Tucker, then, would essentially be playing the role Ann Coulter plays for Trump on Twatter and in her articles: a voice from MAGAland echoing out over the Fake Din of Globohomo and past the cosmopolitan filters of Javanka.

I will never be a demoralization propagandist for the other side. However little of his original MAGA agenda Trump accomplishes, or however much zogcock he fluffs, his election is still a victory for bloodnsoil. Our situation would be A LOT WORSE had thecunt won. Keep your perspective, black pillers. There will be a time to give up on change from within the machine. That time is not yet here.

Check out photos of Trump at Elder Bush’s FUNeral. None of the other ex-presidents made eye contact with him. The discomfort was palpable.

A line-up of D and R former presidents and their families, swallowed whole and then belched out as missionaries for Globohomo, didn’t chum around with Trump. It’s proof (as if it was needed) that Trump legitimately is outside the Washington establishment and he was elected to take a giant steaming turd on the Uniparty’s legacy.

He forgets this at his, and our nation’s, peril. If he won’t accept the mantle of anti-establishment revolutionary, then we’ll find someone who will eagerly take up the banner…and the broad sword.

Ralph Stanley walks away with this week’s COTW:

These “social trend” clickbait articles love to pretend they are somehow “shedding light” on some unknown truth about female sexuality — as if the muslim world hadn’t been covering up their women for hundreds of years. For chrissakes, they literally force their women to wear blankets (with a small slit so they can at least see where they’re going).

You think they don’t know the score already?

By the way, speaking of photos, look up the image of the subject of this piece (and the author of “Untrue”), Wednesday Martin. Her face is Exhibit A for the modern heroine of the magazine world: liberated, over-medicated, over-penetrated, over-educated.

Liberated

Over-medicated

Over-penetrated

Over-educated

The coldest truths are poetry.

Like bare branches set against a slate gray winter sky.

Your modren heroine:

Note the manjaw, receding hairline, concorde-tipped nose, and thousand cock stare.

Verdict: too much T.

To her credit (and to our nation’s discredit), she did manage to have kids (sons and daughters), who will no doubt grow up to be basket-case sluts and wilting soyboys….or tradwives and amoral PUAs if they read this blog and revolt against their schlockmom. Her second beta provider is named Moser, which answers the question of what sort of man would willingly wife up this succubus.

From a Gabber,

You need to familiarize yourself with the author of the book being pushed here. Her name is Dr. Wednesday Martin, and you’ll see more from her in the future. Her shtick seems to be “married women need to be poly whores to be happy”. She was the one pushing the “skirt clubs” in the press last year (i.e. married women going to lesbian orgies).

What’s important… and DANGEROUS about her, is that she has the ear of the upper crust in New York, the people that run things. Their wives hang on her every word. And her latest book is about how women are these ravenous sexual beasts and, sorry men, one of you just isn’t enough.

If the elite actually take her message to heart, that might not be a bad thing. To date, it’s been more of “listen to what I say, don’t watch what I do, proles” from the elite, but if they start drinking their own cunt-aid and destroy themselves, who am I to counsel otherwise?

***

PS Our culture is fast becoming a playground for tyrants and despots. A Virginia teacher was fired for refusing to parrot Newspeak.

***

YOU ARE FEMINIST

I would say this is BAD OPTICS, but bad optics only matter when an objective media will amplify them, which the internationalist-occupied media won’t do.

So EU APCs (practically speaking, tanks minus the large gun turret) are free to crush a grass-roots, native son revolution while the media works overtime to conceal the awful optics from normies.

What’s gonna happen when there’s no longer a distinction between normies and yellow vests? What will happen when the yellow-vested ARE the normies?

vs

PS The yellow vest rebellions sweeping France are not only about a regressive gas tax. They are a howl from native Frenchmen who are sick and tired of their country turning into a third world dump by the actions of rapacious globalists.

DEUSVULT notes,

Morocco World News has more honest stories about the French Yellow Vest demonstrations than most Western media outlets. That should probably alarm us a bit.

Western Fake News has so thoroughly discredited itself that backwater news organizations from pre-civilized countries provide more trustworthy news.

[The special people] will never stop.

They will have to be stopped.

And that means denying them sinecures, refusing to engage them publicly except to mock them, shaming them for their tribal animus, and most importantly to STOP LISTENING TO THEM AS IF THEIR OPINIONS OF US MATTERED.

Latest: The normalization of open female hypergamy, polyandry, and cuckoldry is underway.

Why men should give their wives a cheat pass this Christmas

By Rosa Silverman

When I told my husband I was interviewing a writer who thinks men should give their wives a ‘cheat pass’ this Christmas, he understandably had some questions. “How would the wife find someone suitable for the occasion?” he wondered. (We were talking in the abstract, of course, and I deemed it safer to treat this as rhetorical.) I assured him that yes, it was all very unfeasible, and concluded he’ll more likely gift me jewellery.

And on and on it goes. I won’t give it more print space; you already know the themes: masochistic beta hubby whose first inclination is to wonder how his wife would find a suitable lover during the brief holiday window, a witchy-looking, bitterbitch [special woman] who fantasizes about screwing Gentile Chads while projecting her resentment of her mewling menfolk onto the goyium, a spiteful quest to subvert everything true and good and beautiful of White civilization and replace it with the world-on-fire market dominant minority model that characterizes the world’s shitholes, a raging, man-hating, slut-glorifying, cosmic order- and sexual polarity-corrupting advocacy for unleashed feral female sexuality and heavily regulated male sexuality….

But really, why bother rebutting this ENDLESS stream of bullshit and lies by a psychotic crop of Inner Party apparatchicks when I could just as illuminatingly post a picture of the author and leave it at that.

Bumble Game

Mr. Meaner shows what a cleanly executed chat game looks like, incorporating multiple Game tactics and concepts and moving the convo quickly onto closing the deal.

Thought I’d post this Bumble exchange I had as it’s a good example of a lot of game techniques. Hope I don’t get stuck in mod.

Her: Hey hru

Me: gd u
(Ed: I am so sick to the back teeth of chicks and their lazy-ass openers that I just fight fire with fire now)

Her: I’m alright what you upto?

Me: having lunch; looking at your pics. You?

Her: I’m home sick unfortunately. Haha you like what you see?

Me: i did until you said you were sick (disgust emoji)

Her: Oh

Her: Well that’s kinda awkward

Her: What you got planned for the weekend?

(Ed: neg leads to her asking me my plans. Lol)

Me: thinkin of buyin’ a new car. You’re clearly gonna be in bed all wkend

Her: Oh awesome what sort of car

(Ed: Cue lengthy para about all the made up bullshit she’s doing this weekend)

Me: doing much tonight?

Her: nothing planned think my housemates staying in so might watch a movie, you?

Me: yeah just relaxing at this point. Might open a bottle of something or have a few beers

Her: that sounds amazing. You could go all out and eat cheese too

Me: (eyeroll emoji) fine you bring the cheese

Her: haha it’s a date. What part of town are you?

Enjoy my bros

Well played. I give this Game three out of four Birthday Cats.

There are a couple of highlights from Mr. Meaner’s banter that are worth explaining in full.

  • Bumblegirl’s total word count is 71. Mr. Meaner’s word count is 56. That’s about a 9:7 word count ratio, which is heading in the direction of the golden give-and-take ratio described in Poon Commandment V:

V. Adhere to the golden ratio

Give your woman 2/3 of everything she gives you. For every three calls or texts, give her two back. Three declarations of love earn two in return. Three gifts; two nights out. Give her two displays of affection and stop until she has answered with three more. When she speaks, you reply with fewer words. When she emotes, you emote less. The idea behind the golden ratio is twofold — it establishes your greater value by making her chase you, and it demonstrates that you have the self-restraint to avoid getting swept up in her personal dramas. Refraining from reciprocating everything she does for you in equal measure instills in her the proper attitude of belief in your higher status. In her deepest loins it is what she truly wants.

  • Meaner wasn’t a stickler for syntax. Abbreviating words is the slangy equivalent of Skittles for her birthday. ZFG all the way (Zapped Furburgers Greased).
  • The neg (technically a Takeaway or Indicator of Disinterest) prompted her to ask about his weekend. Chaser-chasee script flipped.
  • “thinkin of buyin a new car”. Minor, but effective for its spontaneity, DHV (demonstration of higher value)
  • “you’re clearly gonna be in bed all wkend”. Vheeky jerkboy bantz. Sutble but powerful disqualification. She hears, “this guy doesn’t think I have a life”.
  • Her: “you could go all out and eat cheese too”. Funny shit test. Most betas would balk and get defensive. Meaner passes it easily with the eyeroll and opportunity for a weekend slamfest by telling her to bring the cheese.

Well done.

Reframe Of The Day

I came up with a powerful reframe in the course of arguing the merits of decentralized dissidence. The upstart social media platform Gab, the free speech alternative to Totalitarian Twatter*, remains one of a rare few internet outposts willing to allow offending speech. This means the pressure on it to bend to Globohomo demands will be enormous. A lone target attracts more firepower. But multiple Gabs across media niches will scatter Globohomo’s fire and help each individual dissident node survive the fusillade.

Which leads to my reframe.

It’s not offensive speech, or offensive speakers, or an offensive ideology.

It’s offending speech, offending speakers, or an offending ideology.

The small semantic adjustment makes all the difference.

offensive: the moral onus is on the accused.

offending: the moral onus is on the accuser.

Offensive speech, speakers, or ideology targets everyone.

Offending speech, speakers, or iedology targets the person claiming to be offended.

Shitlibs prefer the former, because they are indicted by the latter. Offensive speech must be roundly criticized, but offending speech connotes a breaking of taboos held dear by sanctimonious guardians of acceptable discourse. The latter draws attention to the motivations of the accuser rather than to the accused.

*my first twatter account lasted about two years.
my second: six months
my third: two months
my fourth: three days
a revealing look at the increasing intolerance of Shitlib Media.

Vicarious Female Submission

This is a great Game vajnette from VinnyVette, illustrating the concept of vicarious female submission.

Current girlfriend of four years…
First night I met her, on the second beer at a local drinking establishment. Was talking about a crazy freak I was banging who was stalking me. Grabbed new girl by the hair, pulled her to me, looked her in the eyes and said “and I slapped her in the face and told her to look at me while I’m fucking you!” The look in new girls eyes said I’d be fucking her that night, and I did. Been my love slave ever since…

Clever, clever. Allow a girl to experience that intoxicating submission to a dominant man, while maintaining a MeToo-proof plausible deniability by expressing that dominance through the alibi of a remembered fling with another woman.

First, there’s the DHV and hamster-stroke table setting: he’s so irresistible he turns girls into “crazy freak” stalkers.

Then, there’s the kino escalating hair-grab delivered with a built-in, face-saving retraction should it be unwelcome (he’s just demonstratively recalling a story about a girl who was crazy for him).

The physicality of the move is pure pulp romance rape fantasy fuel. Gentlemen, if you really want to heat up the bedroom, skip the roses and sweet nothings and go straight to the hair grab and head-pull toward your face.

Strong eye contact is critical when attempting a power play over a woman’s hindbrain. Don’t break the spell by glancing upward thinking about what you’ll say next.

The follow-up line slyly embeds “Look at me while I’m fucking you!” within a larger, at-a-remove narrated context. You obviously won’t say this to a girl on the first night you meet her, after the second beer. But you can get away with arousing the same feelings in her as she would have swooning under the throaty delivery of that line from an actual lover in an actual bedroom situation, by saying the line within the safe space of a recalled romance with another girl.

This is a version of NLP — embedding trigger words (the good kind of triggering) into a conversation to lead a girl to imagine scenarios, transactions, with you.

It’s unrealistic to say to a girl you just met, “Look at me. Look at me! I’m the pussy smasher now”, but you can get away with it if you frame it as a retold story: “and I slapped her in the face and told her to look at me while I’m fucking you!”.

Note that final pronoun. Not, “…told her to look at me while I’m fucking her”, but “…told her to look at me while I’m fucking you”. YOU. The girl sitting there listening to this is now an active participant in the story. She is the girl from his story, getting wet for the pimp hand.

Finally, the romantic slap. You don’t have to do it, you only have to say you’d do it, or that you’ve done it, to elicit similar feelings of feral, pre-orgasmic submission in a woman. Words are their own form of hyperconsensual foreplay.

A study with a decent sample size (N = 274 female participants) found that the index finger to ring finger ratio (2D:4D) in women predicts their potential risk of cheating.

Being more exposed to the sex hormone oestrogen in the womb leads to women’s index fingers growing longer than their ring finger.

By contrast, being exposed to more of the male sex hormone testosterone in the womb has a more ‘masculinising’ effect – and results in a longer ring finger and a shorter index finger.

Men with longer ring fingers than index fingers have been found to be better sportsmen.

Eiluned Pearce of Oxford University carried out the research which has been published in a Royal Society Journal.

She took measurements of the finger lengths of 274 female volunteers and also sampled their DNA.

They also completed psychological tests on their relationship quality.

She found that ‘women with higher (more feminine) left hand digit ratios are more impulsive and rate their romantic relationships less favourably.’ She added that the finding is ‘intriguing, because the opposite might be expected’.

Ok, a few words of caution. As with any sociosexuality research that relies in part on self-report surveys, take it with a grain of salt. Women lie, and women lie a lot when the question has to do with their romantic longings and sexual history. Women as a sex will “lie down” (heh), meaning they will undercount the number of men they have slept with and will reclassify non-vaginal sex as platonic friendship.

Having said that, we can assume, since women will lie in one direction (to socially signal more chasteness than they in reality possess), that the differences in sexual behavior or relationship satisfaction between high and low finger ratio women would hold as a valid finding, despite the magnitude of those differences possibly skewed by social expectation bias. This would only not be the case if, for some reason, high finger ratio women and low finger ratio women lied at different frequencies. That is, if high 2D:4D women lied more about their romantic lives than low 2D:4D women lied about theirs, we could not trust any uncorrected self-report data that attempted to compare the two groups.

This isn’t an idle misgiving. It’s plausible that very feminine women are more disposed to lying about their chasteness than are masculinized women, given that femininity is in general associated with a greater sensitivity to social pressure and with affinity for emotional manipulation of others.

One more word of caution: the researchers appear to have used “impulsivity” and “dissatisfaction with relationship” as proxies for “higher likelihood of cheating”. These aren’t equivalent, despite the former two characteristics being a leading indicator of the latter risk. Dissatisfied women in relationships can conceivably control themselves and resist infidelity……

HAHAHAH OH MY GOD HAHAHAHAHAHAHA I KEEL MYSELF

….but that’s not the way to bet.

Still, based on my experience with women, I believe this study has touched on a truth about women that would be more brightly illuminated with better methodology.

In the research paper, she speculates that women with the higher index finger to ring finger ration are likely to be ‘more feminized’ and more highly sought after by males.

Because they know they have a lot of options, ‘this might be associated with dissatisfaction with current partners’ and this might lead to flings – or as the scientists call it ‘opportunistic mating’ and ‘impulsive’ mating with men who are not their husband or partner.

The two main strategies in sex are ‘opportunistic mating’ – in other words having lots of flings – and a strategy ‘focusing on long-term commitment’.

She writes that ‘If females with more feminised morphology [body shape] have higher ‘mate value’,

SMV: sexual market value.

The Chateau isn’t an outpost of the world; the world is an outpost of the Chateau.

this might be associated with dissatisfaction with current partners, leading to impulsive extra-pair matings and seeking alternative mates.’

Finger length ratio is a well-tread topic at the Chateau. There has been debate whether masculinized or feminine women are more likely to cheat (proponents of the former reasoning that women with high T are hornier and thus cheat risks), but this study says more feminine women are the cheat risks, which validates a classic Chateau pearl necklace of wisdom:

Options = Instability

The researchers also looked at the ratio of index finger to ring finger lengths in males, but did not find any connection with relationship quality.

FYI, there is very little discrepancy between the finger ratios of gay and straight men. If anything, gay men have slightly more “masculine” ratios.

That last bit about the dearth of evidence for a digit ratio-to-relationship quality correlation in men is very telling. It indirectly supports my observation that women make holistic assessments of male mate quality, seeking out a panoply of hsmv traits in men, some of which contradict each other. As such, the playing field is open to men of varying masculinity and femininity — think on, for example, how common it is to see brooding artist soyboys and musclehead jocks with cute girls — and how that might manifest biologically in a natural selection process that neither favors nor disfavors for long high 2D:4D men over low 2D:4D men.

It’s interesting to speculate on the existence of Darwinian balances that keep lower digit ratio men in the game, and further to speculate that this is the reason why there isn’t a connection between a man’s digit ratio and his relationship quality.

That connection is easier to see when looking directly at the source of a man’s happiness: his woman’s beauty, or lack thereof. Forget male finger ratios; if you want to know if a man is satisfied in his relationship, just ask yourself if you would eagerly fuck his girlfriend or wife. If yes, he’s happy.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion