Is this an example of…
A Test Of Your Game Knowledge
Dec 11th, 2018 by CH
37 Responses to “A Test Of Your Game Knowledge”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
I wonder how much of this insane primal female anger against men is driven by the social expectation to avoid identifying nonwhite men as the primary abusers of women, and how much is driven by White women's growing resentment toward White men they deem weak for not putting them in their place?
-
The Republican Party is a vehicle for Whites to negotiate their terms of surrender.
-
Charles Murray agrees with Hitler.
-
I'm not sure what would be more embarrassing for you. If that was AI, or if it was real.
-
The litmus test for White in-group solidarity will be if Whites routinely take up the revolutionary banner of jury nullification when White defendants are accused of crimes against the Anti-White Regime. May we all live to see the day.
-
Are those the lips rabbis get after sucking baby peen?
-
I didn't want to go down this road (again), because it's such a dank topic (like a whore's blistered womb chute), but the current troubles inspire me to splay my pearls of wisdom across the belly of Whoremerica.
Briefly, centuries of socially enforced and dispositionally organic monogamy, accompanied by very long eras of relative peace and prosperity, as Whites have experienced, results in the entrenchment of the one man-one woman mating system.
Not all men and women participate, but the vast majority do. It is a good system, because it incentivizes male investment in the wider society and in the future for their children, for whom they enjoy a high degree of paternity assurance.
There is price to be paid, though, and that price is the fulfillment of female hypergamous urges. In the monogamy system, women have to sacrifice their primal desire for the top 20% alpha men. That is part of the deal. (Meanwhile, the top 20% of men have to sacrifice their harems. Also part of the deal.)
In time, the deal sours for middle-of-the-belle-curve women, as the socially sanctioned suppression of their hypergamous instinct, coupled with the increasing domestication of the majority beta men available to them, reaches a saturation point beyond which bitterness, intersexual rancor, resentment of motherhood, and near-homicidal hysteria begin to seep from the cracks in the monogamy edifice.
War has typically been the answer for this problem, by culling many young men, but industrialization and the consequent population explosion has meant that war cannot come close to resetting the monogamy mate market with a brief respite of unchained hypergamy. (By dint of sex skew, the surviving men have a higher sexual market value.)
When modren wahms perceive that they are embedded in a mate choice regime that guarantees sexual access to historically weakened, domesticated men, while pumping up the wahms' egos with various cultural shibboleths that extol "female empowerment" and grrlbossery, the stage is set for female spitefulness and man-hatred.
Occasionally, that spitefulness explodes in rage against the children of those weak men.
Not a testable theory, just speculation. Freely offered for your consideration.
-
All these cunts look like succubi. We're gonna need a bigger pit.
-
True. Millions of men deal with hysterical wives, and do so with a high degree of confidence that the wives won't actually spree murder their children.
Rarely, that bet goes sideways.
-
Petition to rename every US-adjacent geographic feature to "[X] penis".
Lake Penis
Gulf of Penis
Continental Penis
North Penis
Mexipenis
Baja Penis
Toronto (penis implied)
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
Frame control/agree and amplify
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’d call it agree/amplify with assume the sale.
LikeLiked by 1 person
None of the above.
There should be a choice that says “No woman wants a man who talks to them like this and desire a man who respects an experienced and confident woman”
[CH: lol i hope you’re trolling]
LikeLiked by 2 people
hahahaha, good one scotty!
LikeLike
It really hits a few. He has the balls? to make the comment. She states he has ulterior motives for the comment. He doesn’t deny the motives, but negs her by his surprise she has a brain, amplifying his own good tastes.
LikeLike
See, this is another area where betas fail. It’s not bad to want to fuck her. It’s life. It’s the only reason why men and women even meet and speak to each other. She’s doing it too, but the shit test is a game they play.
He’s saying he’s proud to be a male and isn’t going to pretend to be a harmless teddy bear orbiter.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I predict a write-in groundswell for “pussy beggar, 2/10 would not bang, and anyway I can tell she’s a Jew.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
4th rule of CH comments: every 4th comment MUST point to how everything is related to Jews.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s because the Jews control the comments here.
LikeLike
Well shit, I can’t write that NOW
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shortest thread evah!
LikeLike
And I had some classics ready to roll, dammit.
LikeLike
I vote for ZFG
LikeLike
agree and amplify should be used as a way to say no ironically.
this is frame control with plain old flirting
LikeLiked by 2 people
It was a tossup for me between A&A or assumed sale. I went with A&A, but I really think it could’ve been both.
LikeLike
Definite A&A. Always been my specialty so I knows it whens I sees it.
LikeLike
Agree & Amplify: agree ok, amplify missing.
Reframe: would be something like “YOU only want to fuck with me, your are a men hunter, I will call the police”
Assume the Sale: would be something like “I am calling a cab for us now to go to my appartment”
Neg would be something like “you are not my kind for fucking”
Qualification would he be saying something related to how good he fucks
Congruence/Inner Frame would be passing a shit test like not accepting being blue balled or leaving if she misbehave
Answear: Generic Jerkboy Flirting
LikeLiked by 3 people
easy there Texas
LikeLike
A touch of non-defensiveness, Ignore and Plow
LikeLike
Dude’s totally looking down her shirt.
LikeLike
opening is direct ghetto game/beta game from 10 years ago(betas are too afraid of this now).
his response to her shit text is several thing:
“wow” is a neg, he didn’t think she was smart as well as cocky funny
zfg he owned it.
it is agree and amplify he agreed with her and amplified his assessment of her.
direct game as well, he wants to fuck her and has communicated it in two sentences
LikeLike
Congruence. It Doesn’t fit the bill for the other options. He maintains his frame, doewnt get nervous when she acuses him of being a pig, and returns with a somewhat sly, backhanded compliment. But its not a neg.
He maintains his frame, hence Congruency.
[CH: this is the most correct answer. Congruence aka Inner Frame. There’s a touch of agree & amplify and an implied “reverse” neg, but the overriding theme is congruence with a ZFG jerkboy attitude.]
LikeLike
It’s hard to judge in that narrow context. Reading the first statement made me cringe, but the follow up gave me a chuckle. It’s a good response to the “you just want to fuck me statement” (a very common test when you’re taking her to tingleland and skipping the line). Overall I would argue assuming the sale, because a guy with game doesn’t blurt of that line unless he is baiting for the test to then swat away. Second up would be A&A, but it really needs more of the prior exchange to make the determination.
LikeLike
But the compliment, it’sa bit much, almost AFC unless it’s coming from a natural who doesn’t care
LikeLike
Tough one. But I got it.
Who says I haven’t been paying attention.
LikeLike
I vote Qualification — he’s ‘qualifying’ her as:
1. Beautiful
2. [ pregnant pause to let her utter her predictable reaction / test ]
3. Smart
Overall it’s a congruent, flirty qualification gambit.
Underscored by a nice reframe “hey I’m a typical kiss-ass” => “Psyche!” of his own making.
Obviously dude was not thinking in these terms while likely improvising this exchange.
LikeLike
He was implicitly qualifying her with his response. Qualification assumes inner frame. Either answer is correct.
LikeLike
Her: You just want to fuck me?
The Don of sausage: Well, durrrrr, why else would we be speaking (cheeky grin).
A girl will only ever says the above if she is considering fucking you too. If you pass the tests.
LikeLike
Absostutely. If a girl is the first to mention sexytime, even obliquely, she wants your sausage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Disappointing poll results. This is not A&A, muh bros. It’s inner-frame/congruence.
His frame is boldly complimentary, so she tries to shame him, and he holds frame by complimenting her again. Her retort is dopey and obvious, so his second compliment could also qualify as a neg. A twofer.
A&A would be something like Yeah, you’ll be large with my child before midnight. I know it sucks, but as an example. And in that case she, not him, is determining frame.
LikeLike
It’s gotta be jerk boy to jump from compliment to pretty awesome zing.
LikeLike
I voted “generic jerkboy flirting”. He is having fun and doesn’t really care at all what she thinks or feels.
LikeLike
…most beautiful but with Cooties.”
Might have been the better retort line.
LikeLike
…a beauty only equalled by your narcissism.
LikeLike
…and smart, too. Do you prefer top or bottom?”
LikeLike
This would work with hb6.5 and below with very limited to no positive results above that.
[CH: wrong. it would work even better on the hotties, because they so infrequently experience this cocky attitude from men.]
LikeLike
Heard the same thing to me at some college party.
I raised my beer and responded: “I was born a Man!”
Worked like a charm.
Not as witty, but I always thought it was my confidence in who I was and what I wanted. I’ve heard guys respond with “no no no no I really just want “. And I always think, ‘Dude… you’re a guy. Everyone knows what you want.’
LikeLike