Is this an example of…
A Test Of Your Game Knowledge
Dec 11th, 2018 by CH
37 Responses to “A Test Of Your Game Knowledge”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
Medieval Europe was the crucible of modern Whiteness. So it's interesting to explore how our Medieval ancestors handled the vices that plague us today.
In the case of prostitution (OnlyFans for the street), the solution often became "arrest the johns and brothel owners and strictly regulate the practice to protect respectable women from male lust".
-
Some people are born with it. Everyone else clings to "10,000 hours of practice" for solace.
-
"Hebrew law did not forbid prostitution but confined the practice to foreign women."
britannica.com/topic/prostitution
Well, that's.....totally jewy.
-
This term woke is already anachronistic. It's become a crutch for neolibs and neocons to lean on when the more honest conversation is about race, systemic Anti-Whiteism, and jewish supremacism.
-
There are typically male pimps behind the scenes who facilitate the pathways to porn for women, but in general it is true that women will readily sell their bodies to turn a buck when it is socially destigmatized and the economic conditions are bad enough to consider it.
You could argue that the abdication of patriarchal oversight by White men leads to this degenerate outcome, but in their defense the State has been weaponized against them and precludes the possibilty of male oversight and benevolently sexist guidance of women's life choices.
The System is designed to maximally punish men for acting with masculine intention, and to maximally reward women for acting with sexual wantonness.
-
The Arab apartheid model could work, but boy oh boy that is not a country I would be happy to live in, when we know what was lost as the alternative: an all-White elysium with a broad, deep middle class that was, for a brief flicker of time, the envy of the gods.
-
The Republican midterm messaging machine does seem like it was deliberately crafted to deep-six GOP chances in November. I might wonder if it was another internal GOP revolt against Trumpism, but a lot of this tone-deaf "let them eat ramen" shit is coming from his people.
If the GOP brain trust is really working to sabotage its own electoral prospects, it's fair to ask to what end. And that line of thought always lands on or near "for the jews".
-
National socialism can only work in a small to mid-sized, racially homogenous nation with a high average IQ, high level of social trust, and a large degree of economic and individual self-sufficiency.
In a multiracial empire with a declining average IQ, declining trust, and a GDP centered on rent-seeking and open borders labor arbitrage, national socialism would manifest as Robin Heeb stealing from Whites and giving to nonwhites.
If you want NatSoc for America, you have to start with the deportation of at least 50 million nons from the land, and that will require politically isolating liberal Whites and removing jewish propaganda from the public sphere of discourse.
If the mass ejection of nons is impossible, the next best solution is breaking apart America into effectively racial ethnostates in which NatSoc can more organically find purchase.
-
Not only are fast food prices rising high enough to budgetarily qualify as fine dining, you are now more likely to contract a food borne illness from restaurant food.
(And CVD from the extra salt they put into restaurant food to hide the spoilage and favela taste profile)
-
The open air seditious coup, with a big assist from jewmedia. These traitors should be hanging, but Trump no longer cares enough to disrupt his asset valuation chart.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
Frame control/agree and amplify
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’d call it agree/amplify with assume the sale.
LikeLiked by 1 person
None of the above.
There should be a choice that says “No woman wants a man who talks to them like this and desire a man who respects an experienced and confident woman”
[CH: lol i hope you’re trolling]
LikeLiked by 2 people
hahahaha, good one scotty!
LikeLike
It really hits a few. He has the balls? to make the comment. She states he has ulterior motives for the comment. He doesn’t deny the motives, but negs her by his surprise she has a brain, amplifying his own good tastes.
LikeLike
See, this is another area where betas fail. It’s not bad to want to fuck her. It’s life. It’s the only reason why men and women even meet and speak to each other. She’s doing it too, but the shit test is a game they play.
He’s saying he’s proud to be a male and isn’t going to pretend to be a harmless teddy bear orbiter.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I predict a write-in groundswell for “pussy beggar, 2/10 would not bang, and anyway I can tell she’s a Jew.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
4th rule of CH comments: every 4th comment MUST point to how everything is related to Jews.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s because the Jews control the comments here.
LikeLike
Well shit, I can’t write that NOW
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shortest thread evah!
LikeLike
And I had some classics ready to roll, dammit.
LikeLike
I vote for ZFG
LikeLike
agree and amplify should be used as a way to say no ironically.
this is frame control with plain old flirting
LikeLiked by 2 people
It was a tossup for me between A&A or assumed sale. I went with A&A, but I really think it could’ve been both.
LikeLike
Definite A&A. Always been my specialty so I knows it whens I sees it.
LikeLike
Agree & Amplify: agree ok, amplify missing.
Reframe: would be something like “YOU only want to fuck with me, your are a men hunter, I will call the police”
Assume the Sale: would be something like “I am calling a cab for us now to go to my appartment”
Neg would be something like “you are not my kind for fucking”
Qualification would he be saying something related to how good he fucks
Congruence/Inner Frame would be passing a shit test like not accepting being blue balled or leaving if she misbehave
Answear: Generic Jerkboy Flirting
LikeLiked by 3 people
easy there Texas
LikeLike
A touch of non-defensiveness, Ignore and Plow
LikeLike
Dude’s totally looking down her shirt.
LikeLike
opening is direct ghetto game/beta game from 10 years ago(betas are too afraid of this now).
his response to her shit text is several thing:
“wow” is a neg, he didn’t think she was smart as well as cocky funny
zfg he owned it.
it is agree and amplify he agreed with her and amplified his assessment of her.
direct game as well, he wants to fuck her and has communicated it in two sentences
LikeLike
Congruence. It Doesn’t fit the bill for the other options. He maintains his frame, doewnt get nervous when she acuses him of being a pig, and returns with a somewhat sly, backhanded compliment. But its not a neg.
He maintains his frame, hence Congruency.
[CH: this is the most correct answer. Congruence aka Inner Frame. There’s a touch of agree & amplify and an implied “reverse” neg, but the overriding theme is congruence with a ZFG jerkboy attitude.]
LikeLike
It’s hard to judge in that narrow context. Reading the first statement made me cringe, but the follow up gave me a chuckle. It’s a good response to the “you just want to fuck me statement” (a very common test when you’re taking her to tingleland and skipping the line). Overall I would argue assuming the sale, because a guy with game doesn’t blurt of that line unless he is baiting for the test to then swat away. Second up would be A&A, but it really needs more of the prior exchange to make the determination.
LikeLike
But the compliment, it’sa bit much, almost AFC unless it’s coming from a natural who doesn’t care
LikeLike
Tough one. But I got it.
Who says I haven’t been paying attention.
LikeLike
I vote Qualification — he’s ‘qualifying’ her as:
1. Beautiful
2. [ pregnant pause to let her utter her predictable reaction / test ]
3. Smart
Overall it’s a congruent, flirty qualification gambit.
Underscored by a nice reframe “hey I’m a typical kiss-ass” => “Psyche!” of his own making.
Obviously dude was not thinking in these terms while likely improvising this exchange.
LikeLike
He was implicitly qualifying her with his response. Qualification assumes inner frame. Either answer is correct.
LikeLike
Her: You just want to fuck me?
The Don of sausage: Well, durrrrr, why else would we be speaking (cheeky grin).
A girl will only ever says the above if she is considering fucking you too. If you pass the tests.
LikeLike
Absostutely. If a girl is the first to mention sexytime, even obliquely, she wants your sausage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Disappointing poll results. This is not A&A, muh bros. It’s inner-frame/congruence.
His frame is boldly complimentary, so she tries to shame him, and he holds frame by complimenting her again. Her retort is dopey and obvious, so his second compliment could also qualify as a neg. A twofer.
A&A would be something like Yeah, you’ll be large with my child before midnight. I know it sucks, but as an example. And in that case she, not him, is determining frame.
LikeLike
It’s gotta be jerk boy to jump from compliment to pretty awesome zing.
LikeLike
I voted “generic jerkboy flirting”. He is having fun and doesn’t really care at all what she thinks or feels.
LikeLike
…most beautiful but with Cooties.”
Might have been the better retort line.
LikeLike
…a beauty only equalled by your narcissism.
LikeLike
…and smart, too. Do you prefer top or bottom?”
LikeLike
This would work with hb6.5 and below with very limited to no positive results above that.
[CH: wrong. it would work even better on the hotties, because they so infrequently experience this cocky attitude from men.]
LikeLike
Heard the same thing to me at some college party.
I raised my beer and responded: “I was born a Man!”
Worked like a charm.
Not as witty, but I always thought it was my confidence in who I was and what I wanted. I’ve heard guys respond with “no no no no I really just want “. And I always think, ‘Dude… you’re a guy. Everyone knows what you want.’
LikeLike