Is this an example of…
A Test Of Your Game Knowledge
Dec 11th, 2018 by CH
37 Responses to “A Test Of Your Game Knowledge”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
I would vote for him before Vance or whatever anti-white golem the Dems nominate. Not saying Hunter Biden will be Hitler Biden, but the sheer lunacy of a President Crackpipe could widen the fissures in Weimarica, and pave the way for a third (reich) party.
-
If Hitler (pbuh) came back to Germany today, he would weep bitter tears first, and then he would reconstitute the Third Reich, but instead of conquering Globobolshevism, he'd direct the full might of the German Wotanic spirit against the traitors within Germany.
-
It's a pathology at this point. It should be an affliction with a DSM-V designation.
-
Thais are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Vietnamese are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Somalis are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Haitians are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Indians are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Hondurans are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.Then one day, you'll look out across your town square, and blond-haired children will be 1% of your local community.
And that will be a big deal.
-
Better idea: Import the recipes, leave the Thais home.
-
"Bonnie Pierce had already escaped her burning Minnesota home when she realized her toddler was still trapped inside. She turned around and RAN BACK INTO THE FIRE for her little girl.
When firefighters reached them, Bonnie was unconscious with her body wrapped around Grace, shielding her daughter from the flames and smoke."
Her daughter survived.
This is how a healthy society should revere motherhood. It recognizes true maternal heroism and carries along the lesson to each generation, as part of its sustaining mythos, that mothers will sacrifice everything for their children.
An evil society gathers its flock along roadsides, to toss roses and weepy tributes to a mother accused of murdering her three children.
-
There is a kernel of truth in this meme, which is why it resonates. But as with all memes, full truth often is not so easily encapsulated.
Women have some moral and actionable agency. They make personal decisions based on innate desires, just like men do, except framed by their female nature.
Women's poor life decisions and political insanities are not entirely the fault of jewish agitprop. Their liberation, a predictable consequence of late stage empire trajectories, removes patriarchal guardrails that had channeled female hypergamy away from reckless manifestations. "Feminism" becomes the easy choice for modren men whose own manly virtues have fled them.
But, women by nature are also consensus seekers, and like a dog without a pack leader, feel unmoored and anxious when there is no social consensus for them to follow and mimic. Women become "bitey" under those conditions, and unloveable. This reality of female nature makes it possible for malignant outsiders, like the jews, to manipulate female consensus-seeking by substituting the organic consensus of White male society with the alien consensus of subversive jewish values.
Once the new consensus is established in the void of the surrendered traditional consensus, women flock (heh) to it, even if it is harmful to them over the long run.
What I am getting at here is that the correct lens through which to analyze the behavior of modren White women is one that recognizes their agency and the share of blame they must incur for their bad choices and even worse politics, while also recognizing the imposition of a foreign virus that has hijacked the emotional needs of our women to direct its expression to foul ends.
The inevitable decay of empire virtues coupled with the inevitable subversion of jewish influence is a force multiplier of White female lunacy and race treason.
In practical terms, what this means is that White men face a choice: place all blame on their women, no blame on their women, or a mix of blame and leniency.
The All Blame option leaves jewish agitprop in place, an intolerable compromise.
The No Blame option requires the complete disenfranchisement of women from politics and much of the consensus-shaping culture. Effectively, women will be treated like children with limited rights and limited accountabilty.
The Blame and Leniency option removes jewish agitprop while simultaneously shaming women away from self-destructive politics, race betrayal, and personal behaviors that cheapen their value to White men.
This is why I have maintained all along that the WQ and the JQ are at once inseparable yet unique enough in their attributes to come under separate scrutiny.
White knightoids for some low-T reason are butthurt about this fundamental truth.
-
Protestantism is the child of Hajnalism. When Whites of Northwest Europe became more individualistic and "bootstrappy", it inevitably followed that those same Whites would chafe at a universalizing religious authority and strike out on their own.
It's somewhat comical to consider the irony of the Catholic Church's ban on cousin marriage, which set in motion the genetic selection for more individualistic Whites, was the very seed which grew into the dominant schism that fractured the Church.
-
When White racial rightists were a nonthreatening circus sideshow, establishment conservatives of the jewniparty felt comfortable winking and nodding at their grievances.
Now that White racial rightists are drawing immense interest and gathering followers by the millions and becoming a major threat to the jewniparty, establishment conservatives have frantically pivoted to dowsing the fire of White rage in the hope of quashing the only real solution to the problems that these cuckservatives pretended to care about.
-
Most people don’t know that Frank Sinatra has an arrest record and a mugshot to match. The reason for his arrest may be even more surprising. The official charge? Seduction.
This seemingly archaic charge was generally applied when a man convinced an unmarried woman of good repute to engage in an inappropriate encounter with him. There was generally a promise of marriage that was never actually forthcoming, thereby ruining her reputation.
In 1938, a 23-year-old Sinatra found himself in just such a situation, and he was officially arrested and booked for Seduction. The charge was eventually dropped when it was discovered that the supposedly single woman was in fact married. Later that year, armed with this new information, the original charge was revised slightly, and Sinatra was again arrested, this time for Adultery.
crimemuseum.org/crime-library/celebrity-mugsh
It's interesting that at a time when the patriarchy that feminists decry ruled America, a man could be arrested for "Seduction" or Adultery.
Now, in the ashes of the patriarchy and in the full flower of the gynarchy with its contraception and abortion handmaidens, a man can pump and dump his way through a small army of feminists with nary a disruption to his hedonistic lifestyle.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
Frame control/agree and amplify
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’d call it agree/amplify with assume the sale.
LikeLiked by 1 person
None of the above.
There should be a choice that says “No woman wants a man who talks to them like this and desire a man who respects an experienced and confident woman”
[CH: lol i hope you’re trolling]
LikeLiked by 2 people
hahahaha, good one scotty!
LikeLike
It really hits a few. He has the balls? to make the comment. She states he has ulterior motives for the comment. He doesn’t deny the motives, but negs her by his surprise she has a brain, amplifying his own good tastes.
LikeLike
See, this is another area where betas fail. It’s not bad to want to fuck her. It’s life. It’s the only reason why men and women even meet and speak to each other. She’s doing it too, but the shit test is a game they play.
He’s saying he’s proud to be a male and isn’t going to pretend to be a harmless teddy bear orbiter.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I predict a write-in groundswell for “pussy beggar, 2/10 would not bang, and anyway I can tell she’s a Jew.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
4th rule of CH comments: every 4th comment MUST point to how everything is related to Jews.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s because the Jews control the comments here.
LikeLike
Well shit, I can’t write that NOW
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shortest thread evah!
LikeLike
And I had some classics ready to roll, dammit.
LikeLike
I vote for ZFG
LikeLike
agree and amplify should be used as a way to say no ironically.
this is frame control with plain old flirting
LikeLiked by 2 people
It was a tossup for me between A&A or assumed sale. I went with A&A, but I really think it could’ve been both.
LikeLike
Definite A&A. Always been my specialty so I knows it whens I sees it.
LikeLike
Agree & Amplify: agree ok, amplify missing.
Reframe: would be something like “YOU only want to fuck with me, your are a men hunter, I will call the police”
Assume the Sale: would be something like “I am calling a cab for us now to go to my appartment”
Neg would be something like “you are not my kind for fucking”
Qualification would he be saying something related to how good he fucks
Congruence/Inner Frame would be passing a shit test like not accepting being blue balled or leaving if she misbehave
Answear: Generic Jerkboy Flirting
LikeLiked by 3 people
easy there Texas
LikeLike
A touch of non-defensiveness, Ignore and Plow
LikeLike
Dude’s totally looking down her shirt.
LikeLike
opening is direct ghetto game/beta game from 10 years ago(betas are too afraid of this now).
his response to her shit text is several thing:
“wow” is a neg, he didn’t think she was smart as well as cocky funny
zfg he owned it.
it is agree and amplify he agreed with her and amplified his assessment of her.
direct game as well, he wants to fuck her and has communicated it in two sentences
LikeLike
Congruence. It Doesn’t fit the bill for the other options. He maintains his frame, doewnt get nervous when she acuses him of being a pig, and returns with a somewhat sly, backhanded compliment. But its not a neg.
He maintains his frame, hence Congruency.
[CH: this is the most correct answer. Congruence aka Inner Frame. There’s a touch of agree & amplify and an implied “reverse” neg, but the overriding theme is congruence with a ZFG jerkboy attitude.]
LikeLike
It’s hard to judge in that narrow context. Reading the first statement made me cringe, but the follow up gave me a chuckle. It’s a good response to the “you just want to fuck me statement” (a very common test when you’re taking her to tingleland and skipping the line). Overall I would argue assuming the sale, because a guy with game doesn’t blurt of that line unless he is baiting for the test to then swat away. Second up would be A&A, but it really needs more of the prior exchange to make the determination.
LikeLike
But the compliment, it’sa bit much, almost AFC unless it’s coming from a natural who doesn’t care
LikeLike
Tough one. But I got it.
Who says I haven’t been paying attention.
LikeLike
I vote Qualification — he’s ‘qualifying’ her as:
1. Beautiful
2. [ pregnant pause to let her utter her predictable reaction / test ]
3. Smart
Overall it’s a congruent, flirty qualification gambit.
Underscored by a nice reframe “hey I’m a typical kiss-ass” => “Psyche!” of his own making.
Obviously dude was not thinking in these terms while likely improvising this exchange.
LikeLike
He was implicitly qualifying her with his response. Qualification assumes inner frame. Either answer is correct.
LikeLike
Her: You just want to fuck me?
The Don of sausage: Well, durrrrr, why else would we be speaking (cheeky grin).
A girl will only ever says the above if she is considering fucking you too. If you pass the tests.
LikeLike
Absostutely. If a girl is the first to mention sexytime, even obliquely, she wants your sausage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Disappointing poll results. This is not A&A, muh bros. It’s inner-frame/congruence.
His frame is boldly complimentary, so she tries to shame him, and he holds frame by complimenting her again. Her retort is dopey and obvious, so his second compliment could also qualify as a neg. A twofer.
A&A would be something like Yeah, you’ll be large with my child before midnight. I know it sucks, but as an example. And in that case she, not him, is determining frame.
LikeLike
It’s gotta be jerk boy to jump from compliment to pretty awesome zing.
LikeLike
I voted “generic jerkboy flirting”. He is having fun and doesn’t really care at all what she thinks or feels.
LikeLike
…most beautiful but with Cooties.”
Might have been the better retort line.
LikeLike
…a beauty only equalled by your narcissism.
LikeLike
…and smart, too. Do you prefer top or bottom?”
LikeLike
This would work with hb6.5 and below with very limited to no positive results above that.
[CH: wrong. it would work even better on the hotties, because they so infrequently experience this cocky attitude from men.]
LikeLike
Heard the same thing to me at some college party.
I raised my beer and responded: “I was born a Man!”
Worked like a charm.
Not as witty, but I always thought it was my confidence in who I was and what I wanted. I’ve heard guys respond with “no no no no I really just want “. And I always think, ‘Dude… you’re a guy. Everyone knows what you want.’
LikeLike