Is this an example of…
A Test Of Your Game Knowledge
Dec 11th, 2018 by CH
37 Responses to “A Test Of Your Game Knowledge”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
I look at that 1920 map, and Southern segregation becomes completely understandable.
I look at that 2020 map, and national separation becomes completely necessary.
-
The national and collective interest must always supercede the private and individual interests. We're still paying the price of a Faustian bargain made centuries ago.
-
Fourth, the fact that White Americans are not composed of any single European nation, but are a blend of all White nationalities, with the Germanic element predominating, means that an ideology grounded in a pan-European "Aryan" racial mythos will always find more appeal here than any form of nationalism rooted in the old 19th-century European nation-states.
A related theory I've had about how ethnic White immigration during the late 19th to early 20th centuries shaped founding stock White America's racial consciousness is that the success of incorporating ethnic Whites into the dominant WASP culture may have conditioned White Americans to believe they could incorporate nonwhites just as easily.
It was not an easy assimilation, though. Italians and Irish brought their racial habits with them, and it caused troubles here. But they were close enough, genetically and racially, to the Anglo-Germanic core that incorporation, largely helped along by ethnic intermarriage and mixed-ethnicity children, was successful, after fits and starts.
The problem with that success merging White ethnics with Anglo-America is that it opened a Pandora's Lox of hubris and recklessness. The newly emerged broadly White core of America, stripped of its ethnic boundaries, came to believe that, based on past successes assimilating the White ethnics, there would be no difficulty doing the same with nonwhite immigrants.
And the economic boom that coincided with the years following the ingestion of White ethnics likewise conditioned White Americans to think that nonwhite immigration would provide similar economic benefits to the country.
Our success assimilating White ethnics, ironically became our failure to assimilate nonwhites.
-
One is the fact that, as a former colonial power, race and racial conflict is central to the lived experience of all Americans. As the country becomes more diverse, this factor is going to become stronger, not weaker—for the same reason race is such a dominant factor in U.S. prisons.
Correct. This is already happening in America. I wrote about this a while ago, making the point that the salience of Whiteness as a personal identifier will increase alongside the increase in proximate racial diversity.
Understanding that White Americans don't have the strong ethnic touchstones which are familiar to Europeans (owing to our high rate of interethnic marriage), it was always more likely to be a broadly White racial identity that would coalesce in the consciousness of White Americans.
In a 90% White America, Whites reflexively preferred to identify themselves by their particular ethnic ancestry, if they thought about their racial heritage at all.
In 60-50-40% White America, Whites will reflexively prefer to identify themselves by their Whiteness, and because of America's influence on Europe, Europeans will slowly inch toward a similar pan-White identity, converging with the racial consciousness percolating in America.
-
As a historical phenomenon, in spite of the current state of politics, there are several factors that favor the reemergence of Nazism, in a great power on the world stage, in the United States—on a long enough timeline.
-
I continue to hold to my hypothesis that the Holocaust narrative and it's associated reign of terror will be mothballed in the coming years due to Israel and World Jewry’s genocide of Gaza. The mothballing plan will be a slow, steady, decay of presence in all entertainment and information media, and Jews will receive orders to not bring the matter up or discuss it with gentiles under any circumstances.
Maybe. But imo it could easily go the other way, too, as jews feeling the heat come round the corner might double and triple down on their virtuous victim hagiography, hoping to leverage "Hyper Holocaust 2: Electric Jewgaboo" to secure the continued loyalty of a sufficient number of (mostly liberal) Whites who will shield jews from mounting criticism.
Either way, jews are in a bind. Loosen their grip on White consicousness and guilt-manipulation and risk White flight from finkelthink, or tighten their grip so much that it provokes a backlash.
-
It really “cemented” the hypothesis for me that the Holocaust’s presence in our minds was entirely due to career intimidation by Jewish power. I always knew people only publicly supported the Holocaust narrative because the consequences were, without exception, swift and severe. Every case, no matter how slight, deserved exemplary punishment.
I don’t want to mislead people with my comment. While I “doubted” the necessity of such vicious intimidation regarding the Holocaust, at this time in the early 2010s, I still believed it was a true story, even if Jews were exaggerating and being overbearing about it. But as the years have gone on, I think we really have been victims of an elaborate, orchestrated, coordinated confidence scam by the world Jewish community. It really was just atrocity propaganda thought up by the Allies and Jews after the war to deflect away from horrible Allied bombings of civilians in Germany and Japan.
-
The Purge was a movie with the premise that all crime is legal within a 12 hour period.
I wish there was something similar with social media. A 12 hour period when it's legal to fedpøost like a warrior bard.
-
And it'll still be the jews.
-
Sounds like some kind of jewy shit. Yeah, crack down on universities that take money from anti-Zionists.
If we had real representation and not a zog puppet show, our government would simply pass legislation banning any US university from taking any foreign money.
That would help reorient the priorities of academia.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
Frame control/agree and amplify
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’d call it agree/amplify with assume the sale.
LikeLiked by 1 person
None of the above.
There should be a choice that says “No woman wants a man who talks to them like this and desire a man who respects an experienced and confident woman”
[CH: lol i hope you’re trolling]
LikeLiked by 2 people
hahahaha, good one scotty!
LikeLike
It really hits a few. He has the balls? to make the comment. She states he has ulterior motives for the comment. He doesn’t deny the motives, but negs her by his surprise she has a brain, amplifying his own good tastes.
LikeLike
See, this is another area where betas fail. It’s not bad to want to fuck her. It’s life. It’s the only reason why men and women even meet and speak to each other. She’s doing it too, but the shit test is a game they play.
He’s saying he’s proud to be a male and isn’t going to pretend to be a harmless teddy bear orbiter.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I predict a write-in groundswell for “pussy beggar, 2/10 would not bang, and anyway I can tell she’s a Jew.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
4th rule of CH comments: every 4th comment MUST point to how everything is related to Jews.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s because the Jews control the comments here.
LikeLike
Well shit, I can’t write that NOW
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shortest thread evah!
LikeLike
And I had some classics ready to roll, dammit.
LikeLike
I vote for ZFG
LikeLike
agree and amplify should be used as a way to say no ironically.
this is frame control with plain old flirting
LikeLiked by 2 people
It was a tossup for me between A&A or assumed sale. I went with A&A, but I really think it could’ve been both.
LikeLike
Definite A&A. Always been my specialty so I knows it whens I sees it.
LikeLike
Agree & Amplify: agree ok, amplify missing.
Reframe: would be something like “YOU only want to fuck with me, your are a men hunter, I will call the police”
Assume the Sale: would be something like “I am calling a cab for us now to go to my appartment”
Neg would be something like “you are not my kind for fucking”
Qualification would he be saying something related to how good he fucks
Congruence/Inner Frame would be passing a shit test like not accepting being blue balled or leaving if she misbehave
Answear: Generic Jerkboy Flirting
LikeLiked by 3 people
easy there Texas
LikeLike
A touch of non-defensiveness, Ignore and Plow
LikeLike
Dude’s totally looking down her shirt.
LikeLike
opening is direct ghetto game/beta game from 10 years ago(betas are too afraid of this now).
his response to her shit text is several thing:
“wow” is a neg, he didn’t think she was smart as well as cocky funny
zfg he owned it.
it is agree and amplify he agreed with her and amplified his assessment of her.
direct game as well, he wants to fuck her and has communicated it in two sentences
LikeLike
Congruence. It Doesn’t fit the bill for the other options. He maintains his frame, doewnt get nervous when she acuses him of being a pig, and returns with a somewhat sly, backhanded compliment. But its not a neg.
He maintains his frame, hence Congruency.
[CH: this is the most correct answer. Congruence aka Inner Frame. There’s a touch of agree & amplify and an implied “reverse” neg, but the overriding theme is congruence with a ZFG jerkboy attitude.]
LikeLike
It’s hard to judge in that narrow context. Reading the first statement made me cringe, but the follow up gave me a chuckle. It’s a good response to the “you just want to fuck me statement” (a very common test when you’re taking her to tingleland and skipping the line). Overall I would argue assuming the sale, because a guy with game doesn’t blurt of that line unless he is baiting for the test to then swat away. Second up would be A&A, but it really needs more of the prior exchange to make the determination.
LikeLike
But the compliment, it’sa bit much, almost AFC unless it’s coming from a natural who doesn’t care
LikeLike
Tough one. But I got it.
Who says I haven’t been paying attention.
LikeLike
I vote Qualification — he’s ‘qualifying’ her as:
1. Beautiful
2. [ pregnant pause to let her utter her predictable reaction / test ]
3. Smart
Overall it’s a congruent, flirty qualification gambit.
Underscored by a nice reframe “hey I’m a typical kiss-ass” => “Psyche!” of his own making.
Obviously dude was not thinking in these terms while likely improvising this exchange.
LikeLike
He was implicitly qualifying her with his response. Qualification assumes inner frame. Either answer is correct.
LikeLike
Her: You just want to fuck me?
The Don of sausage: Well, durrrrr, why else would we be speaking (cheeky grin).
A girl will only ever says the above if she is considering fucking you too. If you pass the tests.
LikeLike
Absostutely. If a girl is the first to mention sexytime, even obliquely, she wants your sausage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Disappointing poll results. This is not A&A, muh bros. It’s inner-frame/congruence.
His frame is boldly complimentary, so she tries to shame him, and he holds frame by complimenting her again. Her retort is dopey and obvious, so his second compliment could also qualify as a neg. A twofer.
A&A would be something like Yeah, you’ll be large with my child before midnight. I know it sucks, but as an example. And in that case she, not him, is determining frame.
LikeLike
It’s gotta be jerk boy to jump from compliment to pretty awesome zing.
LikeLike
I voted “generic jerkboy flirting”. He is having fun and doesn’t really care at all what she thinks or feels.
LikeLike
…most beautiful but with Cooties.”
Might have been the better retort line.
LikeLike
…a beauty only equalled by your narcissism.
LikeLike
…and smart, too. Do you prefer top or bottom?”
LikeLike
This would work with hb6.5 and below with very limited to no positive results above that.
[CH: wrong. it would work even better on the hotties, because they so infrequently experience this cocky attitude from men.]
LikeLike
Heard the same thing to me at some college party.
I raised my beer and responded: “I was born a Man!”
Worked like a charm.
Not as witty, but I always thought it was my confidence in who I was and what I wanted. I’ve heard guys respond with “no no no no I really just want “. And I always think, ‘Dude… you’re a guy. Everyone knows what you want.’
LikeLike