Feed on
Posts
Comments

The marriage of victim culture with attention whore culture has been a disaster for the western race.

(Z-man: “Much as the deracinated society is great for serial killers, social media is great for attention whores and grifters.”)

***

Trump hugs the flag because he thinks we live in the America of his youth.
His love for that America is strong.
But America changed more than even Trump knows.
America is beyond his recognition now.
His flag hugs seem now like tragic anachronisms, or wistful role play.
Like a desperate, loveless couple reenacting a passionate first date.
With sad eyes.

***

If Trump is serious about 2020, he’ll rehire Steve Bannon. Or at least consult him through private channels.

It’s what he should do.

But he won’t.

Z-man writes,

I’ve said for a while that Trump is going to run a “morning in America” re-election campaign. He thinks he is Reagan 2.0. His data guy has him convinced he can gain more votes by striking this happy warrior stance than he will lose by getting soft on immigration.

It’s clear as day Trump is pivoting toward Reagan 2.0. But I have a hard time believing his data guy (Parscale?) is seeing numbers that indicate it’s a winning strategy. My read of the zeitgeist is that Reaganism is DOA as a 2020 campaign strategy. Trump wouldn’t have won on Reaganism in 2016, he won’t win on it in 2020.

Unless I missed it, there hasn’t been a favorability poll of Trump in a while. I’m curious which direction he’s heading now that he’s staked out a position as Reagan 2.0.

***

I’ve said that if the Dems go full retard and stay there, Trump could squeak by in 2020 on his current record.

On second thought, maybe not. We on the shiv-right have a tendency to get cocky about the supposed inevitability of Dem self-implosion, letting our enemies do our work for us. There’s a good chance now, more than before, that Americans elect a quasi-socialist in 2020 to address an out of control, avaricious and corrupt elite. After all, Trump was once the longest of shots.

***

What’s the argument against Ann Coulter? I keep hearing she’s just a hysterical broad, and while that may be true I haven’t seen anyone directly refute her when she takes it to Trump.

***

Whatever transpires in the coming two years, I would never regret my vote for Trump. Like I’ve said, if all he accomplished was winning the election (and skullfucking the cuck paradigm), that’d be enough to immortalize him.

And Trump is still a master rhetorician the GOP hasn’t had since…ever. Today, Trump labels the Dems “border deniers”, which is a great reframe and co-option of classic shitlib rhetoric.

***

Animal rights is an oxymoron. Implied in rights is the capability to recognize others’ rights.

We take rights away from convicted criminals.

Animals can’t recognize humans’ rights, so animals can’t have rights.

Before you say “what about retarded humans?” we recognize their rights because we know they’re handicapped and therefore deviated from the human norm. We carve out principled exceptions.

I’m all for humane treatment of animals, but that’s a courtesy we extend to animals to address our own emotional needs with, one hopes, the full knowledge that the animals really have no idea why we’re extending them that courtesy, or even that they’re getting a courtesy. This has nothing to do with “rights”, nor should it. If it did, we would have bastardized the concept to uselessness.

***

The average age of hispanics in the US is something like 9.

Pelosi wants to lower the voting age to 16.

Coincidence?

***

Who’s pulling AOC’s strings? (short answer: a turk, a bindi, and a soyboy)

Robard drives in and drives out with the COTW in hand,

I used to fart a lot until I went paleo. My experience since has been that there is a direct correlation between carb intake and farting; when I consume only meat I don´t fart at all. If this is a general effect it means that reducing meat consumption in favor of a plant based diet may simply end up replacing cow farts with human farts.

We laugh, but maybe there’s something to this?

In the meantime, Beta O’Rourke is a mindless cipher who’s now parroting Alex Occasional-Cockas’s claim that we’re all gonna die in twelve years from global warming, unless we DO SOMETHING RIGHT NOW.

That something is, of course, giving these clowns and their patrons more power. How convenient!

Tucker Carlson For President

Tucker might be the last public figure on the Right with any balls. Read on for proof of testes.

We’re deep in the era of despotic left-wing gotcha whorenalists digging through old radio programming to find quotes that can be used to de-person enemies of Globohomo. Media Matters — currently run by a huge flamer and also currently violating the law by acting as a political consultant for the Dems, which is illegal for 501(c)s to do — tried to shut down Tucker Carlson’s show by reporting on some funny stuff Tucker said during radio call-ins to the Bubba the Love Sponge show.

(It makes sense for guys like Bubba and Howard Stern to hide that material from prying whorenalists. People would stop doing interviews with any of these shock jocks if they thought it would come back to bite them ten years later.)

Some choice excerpts from these unearthed gold-plated Tuckerviews:

But Canada’s a solid place with good-looking women and good fishing. We should invade.

***

I swear to God, yes I did [have a speaking gig canceled in Canada] because of that. […] Because I called them our retarded cousins.

***

Everybody knows that Barack Obama would still be in the state Senate in Illinois if he were White. […] Come on, let’s be real here.

100% TRUEFACT. You think that vapid shell entity gaymulatto would have gotten anywhere near the White House as a White man? HA not a chance. But white shitlibs hate hearing this, because it reminds them that they voted for the guy based on his race, because he was their redemptive POC.

BUBBA THE LOVE SPONGE: Tuck, do you like coming on with us? ‘Cuase I like you. I mean, I’m not trying to ph@g out on you or nothing, but I like you. I like you.

CARLSON: Well, I like you too, and I mean that. You always say, “I mean that in a non-ph@g way,” but I actually mean it in a completely ph@ggot way.

 

Tucker comes across like a normal man with healthy T levels.

So a bunch of pansy leftoids at Media Matters are paying interns to trawl through this stuff to find anything that might make advertisers flee and Tuck apologize.

But you CAN’T CUCK THE TUCK. Our man has refused to apologize and is taking the fight right back to shitlibs.

In his fiery monologue addressing the coordinated hit job, Tucker called Brian “penishead” Stelter of CNN a “house eunuch” and a “Zucker puppet”.

I would vote for this man.

The current hate speech hysteria gripping the left half of the country has nothing to do with the truth. In fact, the truth is a helpful guide post to what the Left considers hateful speech. The more truthful, the more leftoids want to SHUT IT DOWN.

Leftist freaks think Carlson’s bawdy truth bombs will change the country if allowed to continue.

Since when did old-fashioned bro humor change the course of a country?
Oh yeah.
Since the country became full of hysterical cunts.

The lunatic, fear-mongering, spittle-flecked, totalitarian outrage of the Left is all the reason you need to keep pushing their buttons and speaking Truth to Globohomo Power.

PS Here’s Ace of Spades on the attempted silencing of the Tucker.

Whenever there’s a Witch Hunt ginned up on Twitter, started by the left against someone on the right, it will be about five minutes before the most vigorous virtue signalers on the “right” begin boosting the left’s signal and acting as even more zealous enforcers of made-up leftist rules than the left itself is. […]

Tucker says they’re like Trustees in a prison — prisoners themselves, but offered special perks and privileges for watching over their fellow prisoners and reporting back to their wardens.

The Maul-Right will achieve so much with the cucks’ knives out of our backs and the battlefield in clear view.

It’s brutal cuz it’s true.

Rich shitlib actresses paid big bucks to get their airhead kids into elite colleges.

“I don’t know how much of school I’m gonna attend but I’m gonna go in and talk to my deans and everyone, and hope that I can try and balance it all,” Jade said in a YouTube video from August of last year. “But I do want the experience of like game days, partying…I don’t really care about school, as you guys all know.”

A smart White boy from Kentucky was denied a slot because this ditz’s mom forked over half a mil in bribery money to buy her daughter an admissions acceptance letter.

***

Bronze Age Pervert on Woke Environmentalism and its betrayal of its core principles:

So true. Media shitlibs and their darlings like Alex Ocasio-Quinoa are raging about mandated meat-free and dairy-free diets now because of cow farts, while of course totally ignoring the obvious downsides (stunted growth, soyface, feminization, shitlib politics).

***

Joe Biden is sounding a lot like the campaign trail version of Trump (pre-cohenvergence).

I’d say Trump won on issues AND personality. (Jeb would not have won with Trump’s message, although he would have done better.) But point taken, Trump has strayed far from what brung him to the dance.

Kelly asks the relevant question,

Is Biden is morphing into 2016 version of Trump? Where’s Bannon when Trump needs him?

Trump misses Bannon, and for that we all suffer.

Bannon shot himself in the foot, but his departure was still the worst thing that happened to the Trump WH. Bannon was Trump’s gateway to the White working class — the forgotten Americans — who won him the electoral college and gave America a fighting chance for survival.

Trump has, up till now, largely squandered that support. For the last six months, he has played defense. No big ideas. No more fulfilled campaign promises. No FIGHT. I trace it back to Bannon’s exile. When Bannon left, Trump lost access to the hearts and minds of Heritage America. Javanka filled the void, and it’s been a steady drumbeat of inanities from Trump that include abject betrayals of his base such as declarations that the US needs more legal immigration to fill all the jobs being created.

Things could still turn around for Trump and MAGA, but time is short and the trends are disheartening.

I remember the counter-arguments at the time when Bannon was fired…”bannon has character flaws” “bannon is a sloppy drunk” “bannon betrayed his boss” “bannon was probably a leaker” “bannon is a loose cannon” — which all may be true but still doesn’t refute the central premise that he was a necessary lynchpin in the MAGA agenda. When he left, the javanka entity assumed control.

Now I wonder if it was Trump himself who ordered Bannon’s firing, or if it was someone…near and dear to him who did it.

Anyway, I stand by my prediction that Bernard wins the 2020 general if he gets past the black belt primaries unscathed, and if Trump doesn’t execute a course correction soon. But if Biden continues stumping like he’s being advised by Bannon, we may have a real contender for the throne. And I don’t say this with glee in my heart. Biden is an anti-White scab laborer like the rest, and will do nothing to curb the demographic destruction of America, but he may vault to victory if Rust Belt Whites are still dispirited in two years.

Another update in the romcom series “Deep State Shinola”:

Obama’s DOJ obstructed justice.

And *yawn* no one is doing a damned thing about it.

Lisa Page: The DOJ Forbade Us From Bringing a Negligent Release of Classified Information Charge Against Hillary Clinton

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

Oh wait, that charge only applies to Trump and anyone in his orbit.

Two tiers of justice.

One for leftoid petty tyrants and Clinton rimjobbers.

Another for the rest of us.

One must never forget how thoroughly the media ignored and suppressed the story of Tony Podesta’s pedophiliac home art collection. #TooRealNews

The Deep State — aka the Administrative State, aka the Managerialist Leviathan, aka the Permanent Bureaucracy, aka #TheResistance, aka #ThePestilence — has to be pulled up by the roots and the earth salted for good measure. There needs to be a mass culling of shitlibs from the government bureaucracy if we are to have any chance of victory in the fight for the soul of America. Otherwise, you get Trump — a man who had big plans but was stymied at every turn and eventually succumbed to the swamp.

PS “Diversity and Inclusion”

PPS Clown World

 

This has been a banner week for feminism, if you like the idea of feminists committing mass hara-kiri. (I do.)

When “Gender Studies” professors and Jezebel shrews are hardest hit, America wins.

Hot off the presses, a new study finds that sex-based brain differences are evident IN UTERO (long before culture or social constructivist poopytalk can plausibly have any influence on the sexes).

Sex-related differences in brain and behavior are apparent across the life course, but the exact set of processes that guide their emergence in utero remains a topic of vigorous scientific inquiry. Here, we evaluate sex and gestational age (GA)-related change in functional connectivity (FC) within and between brain wide networks. Using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging we examined FC in 118 human fetuses between 25.9 and 39.6 weeks GA (70 male; 48 female). Infomap was applied to the functional connectome to identify discrete prenatal brain networks in utero. A consensus procedure produced an optimal model comprised of 16 distinct fetal neural networks distributed throughout the cortex and subcortical regions. We used enrichment analyses to assess network-level clustering of strong FC-GA correlations separately in each sex group, and to identify network pairs exhibiting distinct patterns of GA-related change in FC between males and females. We discovered both within and between network FC-GA associations that varied with sex. Specifically, associations between GA and posterior cingulate-temporal pole and fronto-cerebellar FC were observed in females only, whereas the association between GA and increased intracerebellar FC was stronger in males. These observations confirm that sexual dimorphism in functional brain systems emerges during human gestation.

As the study’s conclusion notes, neonatal sex-based brain differences exert lifelong effects on behavioral sex differences:

The study of brain development in utero is imperative for understanding typical and atypical brain development trajectories and achieving optimal long-term neurobehavioral outcomes. The present study demonstrates for the first time that development of fetal brain FC varies with sex. The differential development of FC over gestation in male and female fetuses likely acts as a precursor to sex-related brain connectivity differences observed across the lifespan. Further, the fetal brain networks observed in the present study likely serve as the building blocks for nascent neonatal, toddler, and adult networks.

Colin Wright points out…

Also keep in mind that this study measured *functional* connectivity, not merely differences in brain anatomy.

Feminists and soyboy enablers are being force fed the truth about male and female differences: “society” has nothing to do with them. The source of sex differences is in the brain and begins in utero.

Biology über alles.

Feminist Indoctrination Kommissars BTFO.

***

PS Amazog just banned Kevin MacDonald’s seminal book The Culture of Critique.

Luckily, you can still buy the book here…for now.

That famed liberal tolerance is quite a thing to behold, eh?

There should be a Banned Books Reading Club. That would make a great summer reading list.

***

PPS One of the few memes I laugh at with every return visit:

White knighting in this day and age is about as anachronistic as virgin brides.

***

The West is losing its collective head. In Spain, a girls’ basketball team was allowed to play in the same league as the boys’ teams. The result was predictable.

J.R. comments,

apparently the girls are quitting cause they lose by an average of 50 points every game and end up bruised and injured cause the boys play too physical

as yeyo says, how did we get here? an uncontacted amazon tribe would know this

we’re going backwards

How did we get here?
Boredom.
We got bored with affluence and prosperity and comfort.
Not to worry, the problem is self-correcting.
We’ll fuck it all up and have to start from scratch.
Make life exciting again!

Mace Dindu adds,

We got here by letting a malicious tribe gain dominance over a form of human connectedness that never previously existed. For all of human history, what one “knew” was a result of what he experienced firsthand, and his dealings with his immediate community. Now, nearly all of what one “knows” is absorbed top-down by those who control the mass media. Including you and me.

Mass media is the enemy of the people.

***

Pat Buchanan writes on how the media and their Dem party foot soldiers are actively and intentionally dispossessing Middle America.

***

In one hundred years, in a post-apocalypse post-America, historians of the day will doubt the following cultural signifiers actually happened:

-trannyfreak “rights”

-slut pride marches

-moslem third worlders willingly invited to West Virginia

-an 11-year-old drag queen dancing for adult gay men

-one political party giving illegal aliens the vote

They will disbelieve because in the apocalyptic correction event (ACE) these things will have been crushed to dust.

***

The $PLC has half a billion in assets. The SPLC is also an anti-White genocide project.

You think I exaggerate.

Here are screen caps which caught a “blackening list” hanging in an SPLC office which appears to represent SPLC executives gleefully counting down the days to a minority White America.

Trump, do something useful this week for your base. Direct your AG to declare the SPLC a hate group which should be monitored nonstop by the FBI.

If you find this hard to do, try spending more time with your sons and less time with your number one daughter.

***

Good article on the dating market that recapitulates a lot of CH themes.

One objection I have with the general thrust of the article: online dating data analysis of women’s mate preferences can be misleading. In a sterile online environment, women are harshly picky about men’s looks, but in the real, face-to-face world women become more sophisticated evaluators of men and tend to respond eagerly to hsmv traits like charisma and body language which don’t come across as well in dating app profiles.

A conquering invader demands submission from the defeated native Swedes:

Notice the cowardly native male in the background averting his gaze, lest the victorious tribesman teach him a lesson as well.

***

West Virginia, the poorest or second-poorest state in the nation, is spending $87 million on new housing for moslem “refugees”.

God bless this Heritage American. He’s standing up for what is right and good. The righteous anger of one man could spark a revolution.

A reader,

This is happening everywhere across the USA. Sprinkling Muslim refugees in idaho, Maine, Minnesota, everywhere. The gov subcontracts the settlement to Jews, churches etc. America is going to explode. I guess that was the point.

The forced resettlement of alien invaders is a violation of the UN Geneva article on genocide.

The jewish and catholic immigration and refugee charities bear equal blame for foisting this evil on America.

***

In Michigan, the Attorney General, DANA NESSEL, wants to police the thoughts of Michiganers.

Nessel, in partnership with Agustin Arbulu, director of the Michigan Department of Civil rights, say they will create a process to document incidents of hate and bias that don’t rise to the level of criminal or civil infractions.

That could translate to speech or expressions of opinion that some may find offensive, but are protected by the First Amendment. Bias is protected by the Constitution until it infringes on the rights and freedoms of others, and hate is often in the eye of the beholder.

If what Nessel and Arbulu are targeting are words, thoughts and opinions, this could easily become a weapon to shut down groups they find abhorrent, but are operating within the law.

That’s not the charge of their offices.

There’s reason to worry that’s the direction this will take.

Nessel says she’ll start her surveillance with the 31 Michigan organizations that appear on the Southern Poverty Legal Center’s list of hate groups.

But the SPLC list is widely discredited as a political tool used to harass and discredit conservative groups.

Dana Nessel:

Physiognomy is rael. As is intratribal message amplification.

(I really wanted to photoshop a star of [specialness] in that infinity stone gauntlet.)

A reader,

I might add Anonymous Conservative has some good insights on reading these kids of faces. One side of the face is smiling, and the other is cringing. Never realized how common that was among our “leaders” until AC pointed it out.

The anvil-shaped manjaw is common among these masculinized specimens, as well. It’s no accident that modern feminism is almost entirely a [special lady]-led movement.

It’s ashkepathy all the way down.

Okay, quiz time. What do these news stories from Sweden, West Virginia, and Michigan have in common?

Big State And Big Slut

An explosive 2014 paper authored by (from the look of the names) three White Gentiles finds that female economic independence or female dependence on the state as substitute beta provider husband decreases the stigma against and moral opposition to female promiscuity.

In environments in which female economic dependence on a male mate is higher, male parental investment is more essential. In such environments, therefore, both sexes should value paternity certainty more and thus object more to promiscuity (because promiscuity undermines paternity certainty). We tested this theory of anti-promiscuity morality in two studies (N = 656 and N = 4,626) using U.S. samples. In both, we examined whether opposition to promiscuity was higher among people who perceived greater female economic dependence in their social network. In Study 2, we also tested whether economic indicators of female economic dependence (e.g., female income, welfare availability) predicted anti-promiscuity morality at the state level. Results from both studies supported the proposed theory. At the individual level, perceived female economic dependence explained significant variance in anti-promiscuity morality, even after controlling for variance explained by age, sex, religiosity, political conservatism, and the anti-promiscuity views of geographical neighbors. At the state level, median female income was strongly negatively related to anti-promiscuity morality and this relationship was fully mediated by perceived female economic dependence. These results were consistent with the view that anti-promiscuity beliefs may function to promote paternity certainty in circumstances where male parental investment is particularly important.

[…]

Conclusion

Results of both studies were consistent with the theory that opposition to promiscuity arises in circumstances where paternity certainty is particularly important and suggest that such opposition will more likely emerge in environments in which women are more dependent economically on a male mate. Attempts to replicate these results in other cultures will be necessary in order to determine the robustness of this model under diverse social conditions. Further research will also be necessary to illuminate the psychological mechanisms that underlie the observed association between female economic dependence and opposition to promiscuity (e.g., the cues which shape individual perceptions of the local environment). One plausible mechanism is that people living in environments characterized by higher female dependence are more likely to learn about negative consequences associated with promiscuity (e.g., difficulties faced by parents and offspring in situations of high paternity uncertainty), a process which could generate a cultural opposition to promiscuity that is founded on biological concerns.

Now where have you read independently arrived meditations on this theme before? Oh yeah.

Here.

And here.

And here.

And here.

When women are economically self-sufficient (aka “leaning in”), or their needs are met by the State (i.e., welfare queens), the value of a beta provider husband goes down. Consequently, the value of paternity certainty drops. If women don’t need to convince a man to stay, they don’t need to convince a man the kid is his. And unconvinced men are less likely to want to stay, completing the dystopian circle.

Women who don’t need a man for his provisioning and protection are the backbone of the “slut pride” movement. Big State, Big Capitalism, and Big Slut reinforce each other. Moral opposition — itself a derivative of the disgust reflex — to sluttery decreases in gynarcho-tyrannies in which women can fend for themselves and can therefore survive as single mommies should they get pregnant by one of their fly by night lovers. Men adapt to this new reality of economically empowered women by emphasizing seduction and pump and dumps at the expense of monogamy or dependability signaling.

Women and alpha men benefit from this system, while beta males are left in the lurch. Predictably, what you’ll see in a gogrrl sexual market is the culture coming to be dominated by women extolling the slut lifestyle and alpha men happily obliging them, as beta men simmer. Women who can financially support themselves [cf, special ladies] will agitate for more sexual freedom and the relaxation of social norms that regulate female hypergamy. These women are making the subconscious calculation that if paternity assurance is passé because they don’t have to economically rely on a man to survive and vault the jobscareersgoals status ladder, then they’d be better off in a system that celebrated and encouraged cock carousel riding. Women get their cad chads without the worry of penury caused by abandonment.

Charming jerkboys are making the calculation that it’s better to drink the milk than to buy the cow, especially if the cow has a lot of miles on her and doesn’t inspire chivalrous adoration or romantic respect.

The Big State-Big Slut nexus is where we find the opposite of the debt-free virgins without tattoos maiden paradise.

Interestingly, the recent PleaseMeToo societal extrusion can be viewed as a clumsy reaction to the decades’ long primacy of Big State Big Slut. The flavor is still man-hating and exculpatory of female responsibility, but underneath the surface feminism one can see the faint outline of a female backlash against slut glorification and the destruction of paternity certainty and monogamy that it leaves in its wake.

Ultimately, Big State and to a lesser extent Big Capitalism will have to be dismantled and reined in to reverse the social trend toward Big Slut. Localism, decentralization, and if necessary secession and segregation, will be the cures that herald a return to Based Damsels.

Tucker Takes The Crimson Pill

Media Matters, a far left-wing “gotcha” opposition research outlet for the Democortez Party, found some old audio of Tucker Carlson dropping 100% TRUEFACT crimson pills on a call-in radio show, proving that ol’ Tuck even from his bow-tie days has more testosterone than the collected T level of the entirety of the Uniparty in our lifetimes.

During call-in segments on “Bubba the Love Sponge Show” between 2006 and 2011, the future Fox News host said that women enjoy being told to “be quiet and kind of do what you’re told” suggested that statutory rape isn’t like “pulling a child from a bus stop and sexually assaulting” them and described Martha Stewart’s daughter, Alexis, as “c–ty.”

[…]

In one 2009 audio recording, Carlson said, “I am not defending underage marriage at all — I just don’t think it’s the same thing exactly as pulling a child from a bus stop and sexually assaulting that child… The rapist, in this case, has made a lifelong commitment to live and take care of the person, so it is a little different. I mean, let’s be honest about it.”

[…]

He then mentioned reading a story about a teacher who molested her 13-year-old student “28 times in one week,” and asked Bubba, “Are you physically capable of doing that or do you take your hat off to this kid?” Carlson added, “So my point is that teacher’s like this, not necessarily this one in particular, but they are doing a service to all 13-year-old girls by taking the pressure off. They are a pressure relief valve, like the kind you have on your furnace.”

Other segments with Carlson on “Bubba the Love Sponge Show” had the conservative commentator suggesting the elimination of rape shield laws (“It gives the accuser all the power”), calling Martha Stewart’s daughter “very c—y,” and Britney Spears and Paris Hilton “two of the biggest white whores in America.”

Where are the lies?

The best Tucker quote reads like a classic from the CH archives,

CARLSON: By the way, women hate you when they do you wrong and you put up with it.

CO-HOST: Exactly.

CARLSON: Because they hate weakness. They’re like dogs that way. They can smell it on you, and they have contempt for it, they’ll bite you.

CALRSON: I mean, I love women, but they’re extremely primitive, they’re basic, they’re not that hard to understand. And one of the things they hate more than anything is weakness in a man.

 

Potent. Reminds me of this:

It is said of blind patriots that they follow “my country, right or wrong.” Well, for women, it’s “my alpha, right or wrong.” And what is a defining characteristic of alphaness? Boldness. Women love bold men, right or wrong. Women hate squirrelly men…

A reader jokes,

Tucker should have been more accurate and said,at least, TWO “EXTREMELY”s, and, put a ‘very very’ in front of “basic”,then, he would have nailed it!!!

In those radio interviews, Carlson sounds like he is practically cribbing from my blog.

My god, do you know what this means?

He gathers his family around to read CH blog poasts!

Tuck’s respectable T level status, confirmed:

Media Matters caught me saying something naughty on a radio show more than a decade ago. Rather than express the usual ritual contrition, how about this: I’m on television every weeknight live for an hour,” Carlson continued. “If you want to know what I think, you can watch. Anyone who disagrees with my views is welcome to come on and explain why.

No apology. Like a breath of fresh air. Ahhh….hear that? It’s freedom. Dignity. And ZFG. Trump reintroduced these masculine qualities to America. Tucker Carlson carries the banner forward.

PS More preening incoming.

Trump retweeted Chuck Ross.

This is yuge, because Chuck was once a commenter at CH.

So….President Trump is now officially one degree removed from personal acquaintance with greatness.

PPS Tucker is basically correct that women aren’t that hard to understand….once you know what to look for and accept the Rude Word in your life.

Women only seem complex to men because women think and strategize differently. After a man cracks the female code, the simplicity of it both astonishes and aggravates. (The latter caused by the regret of years wasted polishing a pussy pedestal that never needed polishing.)

And to be fair to the counter-argument, women are more complex — ie harder to read — early on in a courtship, because women are filtering for a host of high smv traits in a man, whereas comparatively men’s buttons are easy to locate and push — be young, hot, and slender.

However, the complexity differential shifts to a more equitable balance in longer relationships, because men start filtering for qualities in women that indicate faithfulness and mothering instinct.

The complexity of women is only a TROPE because relative to the mechanism and algorithm of male desire, female desire can seem inscrutable to men without disillusioning experience bedding women. Since more men, generally, have a harder time getting sex than do women, there are more men who falsely believe (partly to assuage their hurt egos) that women are deeply complex creatures that mere mortal men can’t fathom.

Men who insist women are “complex” traffic in a version of sour grapes.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion