Where pretty lies perish.
Posted in Game on Dec 17th, 2018
Today’s Game tip comes courtesy of reader SiluetteSign. In my educated opinion, it has potential. What does a girl’s face look like when she is soaking wet with Gina tingles? Here is a quick way to find out how. First try and irritate the girl. Ways of eliciting shit tests have been discussed extensively in […]
Posted in Game on Dec 11th, 2018
Is this an example of…
Posted in Game on Dec 9th, 2018
Mr. Meaner shows what a cleanly executed chat game looks like, incorporating multiple Game tactics and concepts and moving the convo quickly onto closing the deal. Thought I’d post this Bumble exchange I had as it’s a good example of a lot of game techniques. Hope I don’t get stuck in mod. Her: Hey hru […]
CH 10 hours ago This is a great Game vajnette from VinnyVette, illustrating the concept of vicarious female submission. Current girlfriend of four years… First night I met her, on the second beer at a local drinking establishment. Was talking about a crazy freak I was banging who was stalking me. Grabbed new girl by […]
Posted in Game on Nov 27th, 2018
How many Game acronyms can you identify? Can you describe the concepts behind each stage of the above seduction flowchart? *** Bonus: Chateau, Game, and PUA concepts, illustrated (credit to the forgotten reader who sent this in eons ago):
Posted in Game on Nov 22nd, 2018
From reader WHITE MALE, OT, besides helping me make more white kids: The term of art is BUNZ => OVEN. What does it mean if a girl disqualifies you to herself, e.g. “I would never date a guy who again?” She is otherwise very obviously into me (I have not fucked her and am not […]
Posted in Game on Nov 20th, 2018
Commenters had plenty of solid suggestions for a reader who wanted to know what to do when a grown ass woman wedges her jerk ex-boyfriend into the conversation. (From PBR Streetbang: “At 25, it’s a sympathy play – at 35, it’s baggage.”) Reader LOL had the best idea, and one I would personally use on […]
Posted in Game, Rules of Manhood on Nov 19th, 2018
This is a classic rumination , written in 2013, by LaidNYC, one of the original PUAs who made his name during the Mystery/Tyler Durden era if I’m not mistaken. (All those memories lost in time …like jizz in thots.) Closure Is Bullshit As a man, you don’t need closure. A girl either wants to fuck […]
Posted in Game, Rules of Manhood on Nov 12th, 2018
Bronze Age Pervert as usual has his finger on the pulse of ancients culture. Gaming shitlib careerist shrikes to fund a pussyhat-crushing neofascist movement isn’t so far-fetched. We’ve all known that asshole who manages to soak a parade of smitten chicks to fund his party and drug habit. (One guy I knew got a girl […]
Posted in Game on Nov 8th, 2018
Bucky has a Game-related question based on a very common scenario often encountered in the field: the jerk ex-boyfriend non sequitur . Game Time: Sooo Elongated “so”s are prohibited at the Chateau. Im sitting here enjoying a neat bourbon at a local joint and this guy to my left is trying to game this woman. […]
When a German says "I'm being deadly serious", he's being deadly serious.
"hypergamous disengagement"
The visitors scoured the brittle pamphlets, unearthed in a climate controlled trove that survived the centuries. They had questions. Did this extinct race of intelligent beings understand the nature of the threat facing them? If so, did they attempt to avert the catastrophe?
For the vistors, a fortuitous, sex-specific genetic mutation saved them from a similar fate. What they wanted to know was whether another species tried to adapt to the same fertility pressures in their own way?
The lead investigator tugged at a yellowed printout of an ancient text. He blew off the dust.
"Dread Game"
Further examination of the writing offered an answer. They knew. Or someone knew, and tried to send the message. A blueprint to save their species.
Further down the pile of papers, another entreaty.
"III. You shall make your mission, not your woman, your priority
Forget all those romantic cliches of the leading man proclaiming his undying love for the woman who completes him. Despite whatever protestations to the contrary, women do not want to be "The One" or the center of a man's existence. They in fact want to subordinate themselves to a wothy man's life purpose, to help him achieve that purpose with their feminine support, and to follow the path he lays out. You must respect a woman's integrity and not lie to her that she is "your everything". She is not your everything, and if she is, she will soon not be anymore."
It was, the visitor would later report to its superior, indirect proof of a cosmic law that directs the will of all advanced life in the universe. A sign, at last, of a Creator.
Inside women there are two wolves.
"I can make it better"
"I did that"
There are some fantastic archival photos of Reich era Germans smiling and laughing while jews in yellow stars skulk in the background.
The jew today says this is because the Germans were callous toward the suffering jews.
In reality, Germans were smiling because they were happy that their society was once again recognizable to them.
And, the jews were skulking for the same reason.
Civilization Cycle Theory and the JQ aren't mutually exclusive. A poster here makes an analogy to the serpent in the Garden of Eden. Just because Eve was weak and sinned, doesn't mean the serpent isn't culpable in the deceit.
Removing jewish influence from day to day operations of the empire would help heal the most gangrenous wounds, but the timetable of empire decline and decay of the people's virtues would remain roughly ten generations from the nation's inception.
Some cities within that declining order would survive and bristle with vitality. More relevant, there would be rural outposts that become seeding grounds for renewal, as happened many times before in European history. What we can say for certain is that separation from jewish corrupting influence will help us manage our own decline, and lead our people to the nation-creation rebirth that starts the cycle anew.
National Racialist or Racial Socialist.
Two ways to say National Socialist without saying it.
I recall reading on here that the biggest problem for jews is the globalization of Noticing.
In the golden olden days, when jews overstayed their welcome, they left (not always of their own accord) and ran the same schemes in a new town. Arrive, become hated, get kicked out, settle elsewhere, become hated, get kicked out. Repeat the process ad nauseam.
jewish group strategy succeeded with this blueprint because the accumulated benefits outweighed the costs of an occasional Local Noticing. But now that the Noticing has gone worldwide, jews can't just pack up, or progrom out, for a new White town to profit skim and culturally denude. All those escape destinations have been closed off by the rapid transmission of Gentile knowledge.
The result of this new reality is that jews feel a lot of internal pressure to stand their ground where they are, and force the natives to accommodate the imposition of jewishness. It has also turbocharged the jewish strategy of buying off, or blackmailing, the elites of White societies, to guarantee their protection from the angry peasantry.
The whole dynamic feels very much like a pressure cooker left unattended for too long. An irresistible force meets an immovable object. No one will give an inch. No side will concede anything. Mass surveillance systems and psy ops mindrape are deployed with increasing urgency, while barriers to clear thinking and truthful reality are felled every day. The tectonic plates continue to rub along the fault line, building up immense seismic energy.
Honestly, it will be a miracle if this resolves in a controlled manner.
Jeffrey Epstein: Woody Allen role-playing as the Marquis de Sade.
Epstein was deliberately creepy. He adorned his walls with the most off-putting "art" and littered his pricey shtetl with pedo-suggestive decoratives.
He had to have known the image he was cultivating and forcing on anyone who paid him a visit. Ask yourself, what kind of person would want visitors and acquaintances to feel uncomfortably creeped out?
And then ask yourself, what kind of visitors would NOT feel uncomfortably creeped out by all that creepiness?
My only quibble with the Gadget summary is the assumption that the jews' numerical minority status is easily overpowered or ignored by Whites, when it should be more obvious that jews use their money and information gatekeeping as a force multiplier of their influence over White societies.
Otherwise, yeah, the future for Whites is looking more and more like one that is separated from the concerns of jews.
