Feed on
Posts
Comments

Just imagine what a spiteful cuck you’d have to be to work at crushing Trump and his MAGA agenda to indulge a momentary vindictiveness at the expense of your political ambitions, your Party, and your country.

***

Williamk writes,

If the muddying of America is destined, we will necessarily shift to NIMBYism.

This is how WASPs operate. See the liberal town in Vermont that voted overwhelming against letting refugees live there.

It may be that the concept of race nationalism does not compute to hypocrite liberals, because they only sense threats as they encroach upon their Dunbar number.

Long term thinking should be get outta the cities, plant roots.

That’s an astute point about the Dunbar number. (Dunbar’s Number is the upper limit on the number of social relationships the average person can comfortably sustain, and usually rounds to 150 people.) Maybe liberals and conservatives differ fundamentally on how well they can perceive threats beyond their immediate social circle. Shitlibs can only sense danger if it pierces their Dunbar Number, while conservatives can sense it farther off. What this may prove is that contrary to conventional wisdom it’s conservatives who have the imagination and open-mindedness to perceive things that fall outside their Dunbar sphere of influence and sensation, while shitlibs only see a mass of LoveWins refugees who randomly do bad stuff to random strangers who are of no concern to the shitlib. (This also gets at loyalty, which is stronger feeling in conservatives and better helps them identify threats from afar.)

For a perfect example of Dunbarred liberals, see the recent truck attack in Manhattan, in which the local shitlibs insisted to media whores that they were unaffected by the attack and it wouldn’t stop them from celebrating Halloween.

[crypto-donation-box]

‘Shark Shaming

It’s Happening!

This really just happened. 2017. pic.twitter.com/KBOmgsqoaL

— Sarah Chamberlain (@sa_harraa) November 8, 2017

More of this and mud runners will eventually learn the lesson: Burn the coal, White men withhold.

PS “I own a color TV” hahahaaaa 10/10 ZFGs.

[crypto-donation-box]

Another seven years of this glory left to go! It’s Hardening.

***

Here’s the very first post in which Trump is mentioned at Le Chateau.

Here’s the very first post (dated June 17, 2015) in which CH endorsed Trump for President. I was ahead of almost everyone but a few perceptive samizdat bloggers.

[crypto-donation-box]

Liberalism Is Childishness

Libs love platitudes because they paper over ugly truths.
Love wins = Don’t fight back
Unity = Concealed disunity
Tolerance = Make the best of a bad situation
The essence of a lib is childishness. Liberalism is a juvenile ideology. It’s rationalizing retreat from adult concerns.

White liberals have a very low fertility rate. It’s concordant with human nature that childishness is associated with childlessness. The good news is that there are fewer White shitlibs with each generation, so this Clown World insanity won’t last. The only mystery is what will follow in the vacuum left by the end of the era of White shitlibbery.

[crypto-donation-box]

¡SCIENCE! says….

sexual polarity for the win!

Men report stronger attraction to femininity in women’s faces when [the men’s] testosterone levels are high

Many studies have shown that women’s judgments of men’s attractiveness are affected by changes in levels of sex hormones.

Alpha fux, beta bux.

However, no studies have tested for associations between changes in levels of sex hormones and men’s judgments of women’s attractiveness. To investigate this issue, we compared men’s attractiveness judgments of feminized and masculinized women’s and men’s faces in test sessions where salivary testosterone was high and test sessions where salivary testosterone was relatively low. Men reported stronger attraction to femininity in women’s faces in test sessions where salivary testosterone was high than in test sessions where salivary testosterone was low. This effect was found to be specific to judgments of opposite-sex faces. The strength of men’s reported attraction to femininity in men’s faces did not differ between high and low testosterone test sessions, suggesting that the effect of testosterone that we observed for judgments of women’s faces was not due to a general response bias.

Soyboys are despised even by other soyboys.

Collectively, these findings suggest that changes in testosterone levels contribute to the strength of men’s reported attraction to femininity in women’s faces and complement previous findings showing that testosterone modulates men’s interest in sexual stimuli.

The more masculine the man, the greater his desire for feminine women. The less masculine the man, the greater his tolerance (if not desire) for masculine women.

Note that high T and masculinity are the primary drivers of male libido, so the preferences or tolerations of effeminate men don’t matter all that much to the Darwinian prerogative if low T males can’t get sexually aroused for the manjaws in their midst. The boner doesn’t lie.

Executive Summary: The God of Biomechanics will not be disavowed.

A reader writes,

this [study] helps us understand why more masculine female faces have become the norm in media.

Heh. The Gaystream Media is filled to brimming tears with low T limp-wrists who aren’t bothered by the lack of feminine female colleagues. You couple that with the natural selection effect of obnoxious status striving fields like media whoredom drawing in manjawed careerist shrikes and you get what we have today: Snarky, virtue signaling Fake News brought to you by the sexually amorphic androgynes who have swarmed like insects into media brothels, and who have corrupted the integrity of their occupation with the presence of their own corrupted minds and bodies.

This is why sexually chadmorphic masculine men like Trump trigger them so badly; the fear and loathing of the fancy male feminist and fierce female ballcutter for Trump is reflective of much deeper emotions than those provoked by political disagreement; this bitchback goes to the id and its force multiplier is raw envy and suppressed desire.

[crypto-donation-box]

An atheist goon shot up a church in Texas, killing 26. (From photos of survivors and relatives, congregants appeared to be mostly White.)

This is yet another mass shooting perpetrated by a leftoid terrorist in the past year. Here’s Pax Dickinson (Gab: @pax) on the pattern:

June: Bernie Bro shoots Congressmen at baseball practice
Sept: Refugee shoots church attendees in Tennessee
Oct: Registered Dem kills 60 at country music concert
Nov: Atheist kills 27 attending Baptist Church

This country is already embroiled in a civil war, but only one side is participating yet.

I’d add that just yesterday a Democrat neighbor assaulted Rand Paul and broke five of his ribs.

Prediction: The major Gaystream Media networks will dutifully fail to report the San Antonio attacker’s antifa and atheism affiliations, just as they have assiduously failed to adequately cover the political affiliations of all those other shootings.

Thank your local dissident blog for reporting the news that our information gateway Kommissars won’t report.

[crypto-donation-box]

Beauty And The Bunz

therebbeblog writes that beauty boosts fecundity, and anti-White Western shitlibs encourage (White) women to look ugly because it reduces their fertility.

The point of the Israeli hotties, isn’t “porn” but that beautiful women boost fecundity. This is obvious but defies conventional analysis. The Left understands that ugliness depresses white fecundity and encourages white women to defile their appearance.

https://identitydixie.com/2017/04/18/moldylocks-trashy-villain-tragic-victim/

Certain countries favor beauty. It appears to be a side-effect of a martial/nationalist culture. Sparta and Nazi Germany favored beauty. Sparta was said to have the beautiful women in the world (Who, like Israeli women, had martial training).

France, Brazil, Venezuela, Brazil, Columbia, Israel still seem to prize female beauty. Everywhere else in the West, ugliness is cherished. A healthy nationalist culture views the beauty of its women as part of its national identity. Give the lads something to fight and die for. Israeli army girls perfectly embody this.

Israeli’s won their independence in Messerschmitts. Israeli tank commanders perfectly applied Guderian’s tactics if Hitler wasn’t so stupid as to hold them back, again, and again, and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. The Israeli commando culture harkens back to Nazi commandos. Many early Israeli parties featured the faces symbol. Israel was secretly the strongest ally of South Africa and Rhodesia. Vlaams Belang/ Dutch right wing are tight with Israel. Israel’s history, oddly, is interlinked with White Supremacy. Intuitively, this makes much sense as Israel is existentially an apartheid/ethno state as well. OFC, US Jews are not going to get this. You can get pissed at the hypocrisy, but this is just too mindblowing for a typical US Jew to grasp.

Israel’s fertility rate is above replacement, but still lower than most of the surrounding Ay-rab countries. But the fertility rates of the Arab MENA nations have dropped precipitously in the last couple of decades, while simultaneously the overweight and obesity rates in those nations have skyrocketed. (Saudi Arabia is either the first or second fattest country on earth, along with the US.) Israel has the lowest overweight/obese rate of the Middle East countries. So maybe there’s something to rebbe’s contention that female fattitude = female barren wombs.

In fact, I’d say there’s more than something to it. Real scientists as opposed to Fake Feminist Scientismologists have known for a l0ng time that fatness depresses female fertility. A healthy weight, 17-23 BMI, hourglass-shaped young women has the choicest fertility of any class of woman.

More pertinent is the fact that most men don’t want to fuck fat women. Sometimes they do, out of desperation, but if they can avoid it they will. And it’s hard for a woman to bake many bunz in her oven if no man is willing to add the dough.

[crypto-donation-box]

Millennials are having less sex than previous generations, according to research by the CDC and other outfits. This is likely bifurcated survey data (i.e., the number of sexually inactive soyboys and fatty bluehair Millennials has increased over previous generations but a sizable minority of bubbly babes and trumpening chads are going hog wild). Call it the 80-20 Piece-of-ass Principle of Female Hypergamy. Nevertheless, an explanation is out there, and it’s missed by lots of people because it seems so counterintuitive. Doktor Jeep comments,

So with all the dating apps and simpery at its peak, women get their validation with a swipe – post some cleavage on social(ist) media and get scores of likes by the thirsty hordes – this explains why (mainly white) teenagers are having less sex than previous generations.

The great paradox of social media and dating apps which were intended to facilitate hooking up and relationship formation is that the technology leads to LESS sex because, as the good Doktor noted, women get their egos stroked so thoroughly by thirsty swiping betas, they don’t need their kittens stroked.

How utterly ironic that the very tech that was supposed to usher Sexual Liberation 2 has instead flattened the romantic landscape into a dreary chafed handscape. The Whoring 60s, 70s, and 80s have given way to the DVZ: Devirilized Zone. Chicks get swamped with empty anhedonic come-ons and the mass of thirsty betas drains their energies into porn and their dignity into Tinder aka chick crack.

A stroked female ego is a dormant female libido.

A sapped male libido is a debased male ego.

[crypto-donation-box]

Trump’s tweets from this morning were extra spicy. Is he warming up for the MAGA crescendo?

Inexplicably, Jeff Sessions has now recused himself from any investigation into the Uranium One-Clinton-Russia pay for play scandal. Trump’s instincts about Sessions were right; he’s a Boomer cuckservative who will fold when the fight gets going. Either that, or the Deep State got to Sessions and threatened him if he tried to expose the entire corrupt Uniparty apparatus for the money funneling operation it is.

Sessions’ recusal from investigating the Uranium One deal means that the public will never know the truth about it. Mueller is s swamp creature and a hillary cabal member…exposing the thecunt’s pay for play criminality is as good as DOA. This might be Trump’s cue to replace Sessions. Bring on the God Emperor…

***

My Christmas wish list:
– Hollywood is rechristened “Mel Gibson’s Beyond Thunderdome”
– Hillary/Podestas in prison yard orange
– GoogleFacebookTwitter made public utilities
– opioid crisis solved, reenergized appalachian whites storm capitol hill with rope & gallows
– chuck schumer has a mental breakdown

Surprisingly, my wish list is less fantastical today than it was one year ago, so I’d call that a very merry march for progress!

PS I’m still waiting for the CIA to thoroughly sanitize the withheld JFK docs and release the cartoon version to the public, after which the Gaystream Media will ask none of the pertinent questions and will continue pushing the Trump-Russia hoax.

[crypto-donation-box]

The Girl Notch

Biomechanical sex differences extend to the infamous “notch count”. A man’s notch is not the same in style nor substance as a girl’s notch. Psychologically, girls record their “notches” in a limbic language that would befuddle men.

From williamk, our COTW winner:

A general rule is once a girl knows she could sleep with you, that’s her “notch”.

Once your thirst is telegraphed, actually having sex is superfluous to the woman. She’s already validated… why take on the potential risks of sex with some dude she barely knows?

Now, its a case by case basis. Her sluttiness, horniness (often cycle dependent), drunkenness also play a role. But in general, most girls worth laying (read: White girls) are perfectly happy to just play goalie and make out, allowing boob feels and giving no nookie.

It makes her feel good, wanted.

To go further with a girl, she needs to think she has to win you over because you’ll walk away if she doesn’t.

Well stated. For women, actual sex, rather than telegraphed sexual interest, is an additional risk that adds little to nothing to her need to be validated as a desirable object. Yes, OBJECT. Objectively speaking. Because that’s what it all cums down to: the human race survives when men look at women’s sexy bodies and faces and are compelled by the power of the Lord to seed their wombs with His gestational image.

This isn’t to say women don’t need and want sex. They love to fuck, but fucking isn’t necessary to fluff their self-conceptions. The man whom a woman WILL fuck is he who arouses her so completely that his flirtatious interest isn’t enough to satisfy her. She needs to complete the soliciting-dicking cycle.

A man’s sexual interest is necessary but not sufficient to pump a woman’s ego to bursting with fertile flavor, IF the man can successfully communicate a “take or leave her” attitude and redirect his sexual interest to other women without suffering some existential crisis of identity.

williamk’s last line gets to the heart of Game and seduction of women. Eagerly flirting with a girl and never pulling back or challenging her — i.e., exhibiting not an abundance mentality but an outcome dependent beta thirstiness — is handing the win to the girl. It’s giving her the trophy before she’s crossed the finish line. That’s the Girl Notch. (Or Thot Notch if you prefer a Current Year lexical rhyme.)

The nature of the Girl Notch is such that a thin girl in her plunderable prime will collect daily and even hourly affirmations of her sexual worth. This indiscriminate frequency means that the Girl Notch is lass valuable than the Man Notch (given that notch value is partly measured by difficulty of acquiring it), but more readily available for ego-stroking when the mood for a personal boost strikes. The Girl Notch doesn’t have the raw power of the Man Notch, but what it lacks in intensity it makes up for in volume. This is why girls often look happy if not ecstatic at all hours of the day, while men tend to evince alternating emotions of ecstasy and despondency.

The Man Notch — which traditionally and properly is simply known as the Notch — is meaningless without a finish line crossing. No man ever earned a notch with hours of foreplay and then a night spent spooning the girl through her jeans as his blue balls weighed heavily with unreleased pressure. For men, ego gratification is the rope of validation unleashed by PIV. Anything less than a Final Coition has the opposite effect on his ego, deflating it from a precoital high; though kissing and a gentle rebuff at the decisive moment is not nearly as ego-shattering as outright rejection on the approach, it is a fact that men feel a twinge of failure, as if they let themselves down, if they can’t close the deal when all the signs were pointing to vajhalla.

So what kind of man does a girl feel unsatisfied receiving his mere flirtatious interest and nothing more? What kind of man does a girl recruit to top her Girl Notch with her popped cherry? Very broadly, two kinds of men:

  • The preselected masculine chad who, as williamk noted, trips her radar while she’s ovulating
  • The man with alpha attitude and force of personality who flips the script and gets girls chasing him

This is the skeleton key to opening pussy: You’re the prize, and she has to win you over. Every man who can be called a beta male forgets this lesson, or disregards it out of spite and an addiction to noble losing and daydreaming about what could have been. Betas appease, alphas tease.

A girl knows a beta male is a sure thing, and that sucks all the tension and excitement out of her interest in him. But the alpha male leaves her wondering if he’s really that into her or if she’s up to his standards, and this will compel her to work harder to please him and earn his affection.

To wrest the real notch from a girl, you have to deny her the Girl Notch. And that means taunting her ego with the idea that uncertainty is the rule and validation is the exception.

***

Related to the subject of this post, LeShitlourde writes about the different motivations for male and female cheating, and why the existence of the Girl Notch hints that female cheating isn’t entirely, or even substantially, about fulfilling sexual desire:

Cheating for women is saying “I want out of this relationship”.

Some betas out there rationalize their woman cheating as a “momentary slip up” or some sort of heat-of-the-moment mistake.

But he’s projecting his psychology onto women. Men’s appetite for variety is insatiable, and even if a man is perfectly happy with his girlfriend, side pussy is a constant temptation. Even if a man’s wife is a 10, he’ll happily be banging 7s or 8s on the side. There is no female analogue to this, because women hardly ever have any sort of compulsion to bang men less alpha than their boyfriend or husband.

But if a woman cheats, it is communicating something different entirely. Women cheat as a way to express their lack of respect for you and to take out her anger at your weakness. And if you choose to stay, she will lose all respect for you, throttle the sex to zero, and metaphorically wipe her ass with you for money and support for as long as she can get away with.

The Girl Notch is SMV validation without the sex. It is particularly suited for women because men are less sexually continent, thus there’s no equivalent Girl Notch for men. Women know men will have sex with them as soon as they have indicated their interest, but men don’t know the same about women. It is often the case that many men receive positive signals from girls but then fumble somewhere along the way and lose the shot at sex. This affliction hits greater beta males the hardest.

Tangentially, what this means is that when women cheat they are doing so for reasons that extend beyond ego and loin gratification. Sexual fulfillment is part of that (alpha fux, beta bux) but a bigger part is what Le Shitlourde mentioned: women cheat to lash out at their domesticate men. If cheating was solely about stroking her ego, she’d get her kicks flirting with strange men but not taking it farther than that. This is why a man must immediately ditch a GF or wife who cheats on him; she has crossed a line that indicates a commitment to a larger disloyalty than that which would follow from mere “momentary passion”.

Reader Cracker adds that men’s apocalyptic reactions to female cheating are indirect proof that different standards for the sexes are evolved responses that accurately reflect the differing size of the impact that cheating has on each sex,

exactly right

there is no recovery after a girl cheats and the relationship will only get worse.

i get trying to stick by your obligations especially if kids are involved but there is no happy ending if you decide to stay. and it’s bad for the kids.

even if they aren’t told about the cheating, they will see and feel that something is wrong with the two of you. they will lose respect for you as a man.

son will grow up to be a pussy who gets used and abused by women and daughter will grow up to be a whore like mommy. best way to prevent that is to teach them a good lesson. show them strong men don’t tolerate cheating. leave and get a better woman so they can see how things are supposed to be. that’s the only way.

besides that, getting over the fact that she was with another man was something i couldn’t get over. i don’t know how any man could. i had a girl cheat who i was head over heels for. i would have done anything for her. full blown oneitis.

but after she cheated, i couldn’t stand the thought of touching her again. going where another man had been. leaving her was the best thing i ever did in my life. after her was when my life really began.

It’s a fact that men experienced in the world of women learn early on: women can get over male cheating quicker and more thoroughly than men can get over female cheating. Women often run right back to cheating men, if they love those men; and though the wound of betrayal never fully heals she is happy to have him back in her arms again, because the grief of losing him would cut her deeper. Men, by contrast, and unless they are LSMV losers with no other options or hope of options, are less eager to take back a cheating woman. As Cracker said, there is often an accompanying disgust that prevents a man from ever again touching a woman who has cheated on him. It’s as if the invasive cock left a foul odor or slimy sheen on her skin, and now she is an object to be tolerated at best, disposed of at worst, for whom his affection can find no purchase.

[crypto-donation-box]

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »