Where pretty lies perish.
Feb 20th, 2018 by CH
It’s not a coincidence that female obesity and miscegenation are rising in lockstep in post-America.
If the country is filling up with more nonWhites of undiscerning taste, and more White females of unrecognizable shape, then the predictable outcome is Halfbreed Hamerica.
Fat White women take what they can get, which is usually either solitude or sooty coal.
Feb 20th, 2018 by CH
Reeducation camps have opened in Chicago, in this particular instance taking the form of billboards proselytizing to benighted Americans the value of opening their hearts and minds to the unifying and strengthening vibrancy of a foreign religion’s weird, off-putting customs.
I’ll keep my thoughts brief. This country is no longer mine. I want out. I’ve been made a stranger in my own home.
I wish the worst tortures that Hell’s caretakers can dish out to my enemies who have invited the alien hordes into my land.
***
Soul cleanser:
Feb 20th, 2018 by CH
I’m gonna let youze yeggs in on a leetle secret. You want to experience the profound joy of romancing, bedding, and loving many, many attractive women? Then you’ll get far if you do this one weird trick:
Make your intention known.
Now, I don’t mean walk up to girls and tell them you want to bang them silly. Girls require a veneer of plausible deniability. The art of flirting is revealing a hint of a glimpse of what’s on your mind without spelling it out.
I mean, make eye contact, and keep it a tic past the threshold of discomfort.
That’s all you need to get going on your journey of poon. The simple act of telegraphing seductive intent through the eyes and the body will open the door to endless romantic possibility. So many women are starved for the attention of men who can forcefully command their gaze.
Beta males suffer a case of Attention Diffidence Disorder that prematurely kills so many chances with girls it may as well be called crib death for cocksas. Cold approaches from a blind angle are always fun, but nothing stimulates every sense quite like an unspoken invitation to thigh adventure. Show intention and her blood pounds, chest reddens, pussy tingles. It’s just a beginning, with no guarantee of a fulfilling end, but what a sweet beginning it is, the first dulcet notes of a symphony waiting for your conductor’s baton.
Feb 20th, 2018 by CH
A recent meta-analysis of sixteen studies concluded that sex-based personality characteristics and preferences are biological, inborn, and unchangeable.
In related news, a million fluid transgenderist feminist lamebrains exploded simultaneously from the meaty intrusion of evidence-based SCIENCE.
According to a new study, differences between boys and girls are biological and not fluid, as transgender theory claims.
Research revealed in the Infant and Child Development Journal concluded that gender preferences in children are not so much the result of their environment and upbringing as they are intrinsic within the child. These findings contradict prevailing LGBTQQICAPF2K+ belief that gender is both externally directed and fluid. […]
Sixteen studies composed of 787 boys and 813 girls were documented. Researchers found that consistently “boys played with male-typed toys more than girls did, and girls played with female-typed toys more than boys did.”
This finding won’t surprise most parents, but it defies prevailing transgender theories that say gender differences are simply a “social construct.”
The same innate gender preferences were observed in a variety of contexts. “No significant effect of presence of an adult, study context, geographical location of the study, publication date, child’s age, or the inclusion of gender-neutral toys” made a difference, the data showed.
The scientists concluded that the data from these studies indicated “gender differences” have a “likelihood (of) biological origin.” In other words, before you were born you were a boy or a girl, and that’s not subject to change.
“The consistency in finding sex differences in children’s preferences for toys typed to their own gender indicates the strength of this phenomenon and the likelihood that has a biological origin,” the study says.
The God of Biomechanics laughs at your idiotic feminist ideals.
Just as what one sees in an ink blot or instinctively associates with a suggested word can indicate one’s internal psychology, so a child’s free, self-directed choice of toy can indicate his or her innate psychology. Researchers say such choices “appear to be the product of both innate and social forces.”
More and more, when social scientists say “appear to be the product of both innate and social forces” they really mean “appear to be the product almost entirely of innate forces but our freakqualist leftoid egos are fragile and we’re still holding out hope that a super duper secret replicable feminist study will rise from the grave one day soon to prove once and for all that NURTURE BTFOs NATURE MUHFUGGA!”.
The study also found male gender differences increased with age. “Older boys played more with male-typed toys … than did younger boys,” but “the same pattern was not found in girls.” Researchers speculated that this observation may be because of increasing social pressure on girls to break from innate stereotypes.
So boys became more boy-like with age, while older girls stayed as girl-like as they were when little.
I can think of a few reasons for this apparent disparity, in descending order of likelihood.
If, say, genetic biological immutability accounts for 70-80% of sex-based preferences and aptitudes, then imagine how malevolently insistent, unremitting, and remorseless the Leftoid Equalist social pressures would have to be to overcome that innate predisposition and have an impact on the choices of growing boys and girls. Downright evil, really.
Feb 20th, 2018 by CH
Lawrence Auster passed away a few years ago, but his stamp on maul-right discourse lingers. In my estimation, he was a Jew of sufficient based-ness that I’d put him in the same rarefied company that includes Stephen Miller and Mickey Kaus. Here is Auster explaining the reason for Jewish support of mass nonWhite and nonChristian immigration into Gentile host nations:
That’s a highball of truth right there. The peculiar Jewish psychological profile of neuroticism coupled with psychopathy predicts this exact sort of behavior toward the majority culture. From a historical vantage, it’s incredibly short-sighted.
And we see this jewish predilection playing out in every imaginable way. Today, Jewish provocateurs assemble groups of child soldiers in Florida, following the de Jesus Cruz shooting, to agitate for gun control, which is really goyim control.
If the thesis that diaspora jews are most paranoid about a White Gentile uprising against them is true, then OF COURSE jews would want their Gentile hosts completely disarmed.
Yet instead of wisely reflecting on their own motivations and simmering resentments, jews prefer to take the moon shot of rendering the goyim toothless and impotent.
RIP Auster, you had a critical word or two to say about this blog, but you are honored here because your writing will be looked back on as prescient during a time of turbulence. You were one of the few jews who could cast a judgmental eye at the flaws and foibles of your own tribe. If only there were more like you in positions of influence.
***
Given that this post meandered a bit into the topic of gun control, a word from your esteemed host:
Trump should not concede an iota to the shrieking shitlibs on their “gun control” issue.
As sure as snide follows gay, that first tiny concession will lead to more concessions, and bigger concessions, until the 2nd Amendment is a historical relic.
This is because the goal of shitlibs is total disarmament of Heritage Whites. If it was about stopping violent crime, shitlibs would be all for effective methods like racial profiling and long prison sentences. But they aren’t. So they’re lying about their real motive.
Feb 20th, 2018 by CH
DEUSVULT wonders,
what is the lefts obsession on hating Christianity, but going balls deep in love with islam?
Less complex answer: Leftoids are cowards. It’s easier to insult people who won’t fight back.
More complex answer: Leapfrogging loyalty (a term coined by Steve Sailer iirc).
There are many psychological factors that explain leftist virtue sniveling, but one that I don’t see getting much airplay is this: virtue signaling is a way for leftoids to morally preen without actually having to act morally.
It’s a lot more work to be manifestly charitable toward your White neighbor than it is to profess empty charity toward a far away foreigner you will never see nor interact with except possibly at political protests against HURPHLE DRUMPH. Leftoids don’t want to do the hard work of charitable giving, they just want to emote about how charitable they are, and the best way for them to do that is by directing their phony piousness to alien hordes who are kept out of leftoid neighborhoods by restrictive zoning laws and high housing costs. The leftoid who claims the mantle of the xenophilic priesthood is careful to choose distant Others as the objects of her mouthed generosity, because if she made the mistake of speaking charitably about her countrymen and neighbors there’s a chance she’d have to put her signaling into concrete action.
Feb 19th, 2018 by CH
I was standing near a couple who appeared to be navigating the psychosexual thickets of a second or third date. White girl and Street Shitter. He was chatting incessantly. She looked depressed. Every so often I caught her checking out my Great Whiteness. I could see the redirected sex thoughts and the rue mingling on her face.
If current dating market trends hold, there’ll be a lot of ruing in post-America. The Rue Side of History.
Feb 19th, 2018 by CH
Almost all pre-Wall women who haven’t surrendered to The Fattening are natural exhibitionists, to a lesser or greater degree of commitment and intensity. It’s in their meat robot wiring, because women have to exhibit themselves to capture men’s attention. They certainly won’t attract male attention with their math skills or stand-up routines.
HB exhibitionism is therefore a rhythm of female life that is best tolerated, or even eagerly welcomed as part of the richness of passionate seduction. However, a man will, in the course of a full dating life, occasionally tangle with a pathological exhibitionist. You know the type: standard BPD operating system, crazy eyes from either too little or too much alpha cock, a whimsical GUI that hides a devious sociopathic core processor, and most notably a propensity for shoving her blatant sexuality in a man’s face and then accusing him (in so many words) of objectifying her. Paging PoundMeToo…
On the topic of gaming exhibitionists (who will Game the Gamer?), Turd Ferguson asks,
What’s the best way to game the Exhibitionist?
Story: Last night at the gym, strong HB8.5 wearing spandex shorts & sports bra. Must have really been worried about her upper back bc she did only bent-rows for 30 minutes. [ed: she was presenting] I approached, she seemed enjoy my teasing & smiled a lot, but rejected the # close. What do?
The strategy is a simple one. Exhibitionists expect male slobbering. Defy that expectation. Don’t be a StepinFelchIt. Exhibitionists are gamed by deflating their expectation of thirsty betas noticing them. Very subtle negs insinuating that you know what they’re up to are usually gold. For example, in Turd’s scenario above: “Are two mirrors enough for you? Minimum, three, to get your form right.”
What the implementation of the counter-exhibitionist strategy entails is a. acting like you don’t notice her flagrant displays of attention or b. noticing her display, but only to make fun of her for it. A really good tactic I’ve found is to call the exhibitionist an amateur, along the lines of “flaunting your cleavage is so derivative”*.
*please do not use the word derivative. i used it here for humorous effect. off this blog, use a normiejerk line such as, “does that cleavage act work for you?”.
There are other tacts. You could accuse the exhibitionist of not living up to your standards for clear and evident displays of female sexual interest. Or you could completely flip the script and chide her for being a prude in dress or behavior. This really mindfucks the psychobitionists, especially if she’s hiking her skirt up and you tell her she should try showing more leg if she wants a man to notice her.
Feb 18th, 2018 by CH
If I haven’t already, this 1996 study deserves to be added to the Diversity + Proximity = War reference list at the top of this blog’s home page. Executive summary: Demographically (i.e., racially and ethnically) diverse workplaces have lower cohesion, lower satisfaction, and higher turnover.
…high diversity prevents social integration and cohesion from forming on the team. In their absence, team members are unable to effectively process information…
…Group cohesiveness is positively related to performance. Three meta-analyses and several empirical studies found a slight to moderate positive relationship between cohesiveness and performance. This is a robust finding in an area that has long been studied…
…separated conflict into two types: relationship conflict (interpersonal incompatibilities, tension, animosity, and annoyance) and task conflict (disagreement among group members about task content)…Relationship conflict was detrimental to satisfaction and to members’ intent to remain in the group regardless of the type of task…
…The most consistent findings occurred when tenure predicted strategic persistence and change, and when demographic heterogeneity predicted turnover….there’s a direct relationship between diversity and turnover, in that similarities attract and those dissimilar may be 40 pressured to leave the team…
Diversity is not our organizational strength. At best, diversity is our neutral organizational variable; at worst, diversity is our disorder.
So why do our overlords foist it on us?
Because our cooperative homogeneity is our strength…and their vulnerability.
***
Commenter westray exposes the fundamental contradiction at the heart of modren anti-White leftism:
“Diversity Is Our Strength” right next to “All Races Are Equal” placards at any given lefty rally. And no lefty can see the self-cancellation. You could walk a 3 year old boy through that and he’d have a more clear understanding.
“These people are different, right?”
“Yes.”
“So are they the same if they are different?”
“No”
“If they are different will they do things the same way?”
“No”
“If they are different will they do things differently?”
“Yes”
“If people do things differently will there be different results?”
“Yes”
Sorted.
If Orwell were alive today, would he have spent the last years of his life saying “I told you so” over and over to whomever was listening?
Last Leaf
There was a little tree
it grew alone
it grew proud
"I need no one!
I will plant my deep roots here
cover myself in the thickest bark
and reach to the sky
for there is greatness in me!"
And so he grew.
And then other trees planted their roots near it
And those trees shared messages between their roots
chemical messages
which helped them grow bigger, faster, and taller.
Until the day came that their canopies rose above the canopy of our prideful tree
and overshadowed it
depriving it of sunlight
until it began to lose its leaves
suffocating in the shadow of the giants above it
it refused help from trees of his kin
it refused to set seed
"I will grow!" it insisted
"I will rise to my greatness!"
and then it fell silent
when its last leaf
proud to the end
fluttered to the forest floor
to feed the trees that supplanted it
Now that we've skimmed the functional brahmins from India, all their poo-flinging train-splotching inbred cousins are streaming in by the millions.
I expect and hope this will redound badly on the jeet doctors and accountants who finally cracked into White shitlib superzips.
"You know this guy?!"
"Saar, please to understand, food expiration dates are for toilet shitters."
"What do you think about him hitting himself with a hammer to improve his looks?"
AOC: makes it all about women
Coconut oil by itself might get you to spf 7, which doesn't meet the FDA minimum threshold of spf 15 for adequate UV protection. Calcium carbonate as a texture additive might boost the spf a few points.
If you are prone to skin cancer, you should probably stick with the FDA approved sunscreens, 30 spf or higher.
Also, coconut oil is incredibly greasy. You like that feeling on a hot humid day? There are non-greasy sunscreen options that feel like talcum powder.
And yes, I know it's generally a good idea to get some unfiltered sun on one's skin.
Guess what these states all have in common?
Nigs?
They all voted for President Trump in 2024.
ffs
I would enjoy a public debate on the 2020 election fraud, but it should include the Kennedy election steal of Illinois in 1960, and the LBJ Senate election steal of Texas in 1948.
Air out all the dirty laundry and make it so that shitlibs can't keep going to the well of "election denialism".
Trump: "It was Iran"
Reality: "It was Israel and jewish influence in US politics"
"This is so terrible. Anyhow...."
I think it can get bad enough, but by that time Whites will be too outnumbered and scattered to effectively rescue themselves.
This was the idea behind accelerationism: to make it bad enough soon enough, before it's too late to do anything.
The Sprog Staircase Phenomenon Of Societal And Sexual Decline
Feb 20th, 2018 by CH
COTW winner is early this week, because no one will beat this comment by Amasius explaining the “Staircase Phenomenon” (or what I’ve amended to the “Sprog Staircase”) as a description of the type of low class White women whose executive functions and SMV decline so badly with age they hit their 30s with mulattots in tow:
Commenter TLM follows up with a real life confirmation of the Staircase Phenomenon,
One can track a nation’s decline as well as a woman’s decline by the descent of both down the Sprog Staircase. That changing Crapola color scheme is the perfect indicator of a White nation and a White woman about to hit The Wall.
If her first kid’s Peach
her SMV’s out of reach
If her second kid’s Burnt Sienna
her jelly belly goes on forever
If her third kid’s Carbon Black
Your nation’s dead, it won’t come back.
Posted in Comment Winners, Da Goyim Know, Funny/Lolblogs, Globalization, Goodbye America, Hitting The Wall, Hungry Hungry Hippos, Sluts, Ugly Truths | 32 Comments »