Where pretty lies perish.
Posted in Comment Winners on Apr 28th, 2013
Commenter James notices a pattern, and it looks suspiciously like a hamster’s roan coat: every sicilian or italian I’ve known has claimed their family has mob connections. just like every black guy is a producer and its every stripper’s first day. its all bullshit. What’s the NUMBER ONE lie you will hear from single, upper […]
Posted in Comment Winners, Funny/Lolblogs on Mar 22nd, 2013
Jack provides a laundry list of common hamster rationalizations, peculiar to both sexes. The lower your SMV, the “pickier” you become. “game only works on sluts” – beta male “black guys are hot” – fat chick “There are no good men” – fat black woman “eat a sandwich!” – friend zoned beta orbiter commenting on […]
Posted in Comment Winners on Mar 3rd, 2013
The COTW goes to winner Uncle Elmer confesses: I like to watch Vietnamese travelogues with ForeignBride while she gently massages my loins. The food variety is epic. Some comments win on substance. Others on the style with which the words trip psychedelically off the tongue. This week’s winner is firmly in the latter category. Runner-up […]
Posted in Comment Winners on Feb 15th, 2013
Commenter Revo Luzione suggests a reason why the exclamation snort is not attractive when women use it: Kate: “Many a text exchange has reached a dead end when I reply with “snort.”” That’s because elephants, rhinos, and angry Holsteins all snort before charging. Snort! This gets to a larger point: the snark and snideness and […]
Posted in Comment Winners, Feminist Idiocy, Tool Time on Jan 8th, 2013
shive1008 hams it up: Approaching women is a Demonstration of Lower Value. It basically says, “I know you wouldn’t give a shit about me otherwise, so I’m going to have to force you to pay attention to me.” Keep at it chumps. The man-hating troll will deny the laws of physics if it helps it […]
Posted in Comment Winners on Dec 14th, 2012
Reader BC gives some historical perspective to the alimony issue. (“Historical whaaa? I’m a feminist, I know not of such things. Please to dress it up in snark so that I can properly menstruate in the comments section at Jizzebel.”) In Olde Timey days — like, medieval England, we’re talking about — a husband gained […]
Posted in Comment Winners on Nov 16th, 2012
taterearl writes: Narcissism = higher value in yourself…taking women off the pedestal Machiavellianism = pretty much game…using women’s nature to get what you want psychopathy = aloof and unconcerned when a woman gets flighty with her emotions You don’t need to turn into a serial killer to get women…just understand these personality traits do have […]
Posted in Comment Winners on Nov 9th, 2012
Famed commenter gig (a Chateau VIP) passes along this story from a friend: Fun story, not mine, from a friend. He was in first or second year in college, and dating a girl still in high school. He’d started working, unlike her. So he had much more money than her. And he gave her a […]
Posted in Comment Winners on Oct 18th, 2012
The Man Who Was…. opines: It is one of the saddest facts of life that you only get to bang hot girls once your ability to appreciate them has decreased. For health and longevity reasons , I have decided to try and be less cynical about humanity, or at least to welcome a bout of […]
Posted in Comment Winners on Sep 14th, 2012
Reader whorefinder posits a theory explaining why, historically, women’s sexuality has been deemed more dangerous than men’s sexuality to societal cohesion: One thing about bitches in heat is that they really aren’t that used to it. For all the jokes about men being led around by their dicks, men at least have the experience of […]
Convenience and ease are the lullabies sung to Whites as they are swaddled in a straitjacket.
The kikes didn't "deal with" the Germans. Their Anglo shabbos mercenaries dealt with the Germans. Talk about Stolen Pallor!
Also, gotta love that yid gratitude. "Thanks, America, for your help! Now here's your orchestrated demise in return."
Also, Mamdani seems to be advocating for highly secure, closed borders. If you aren't from here, then it's "papers please!" before you can buy food.
Funny how that works. You have a single secure border at the national level, or you have many secure borders at the local level.
Either way, borders are the natural order.
It's fair (and easy) to criticize the idea of Whites being objectively the most beautiful race in the world, premised on the counter-argument that each race has an innate preference for the looks of its own people. One could say that Whites are just as biased as all other races to think their own the most comely.
The problem with this tepid take is that we have evidence that races from across the world strive to look White. Indians love to whiten their skin. Orientals get cosmetic surgery to widen their epicanthic folds. The male nigger can't stop asking "where da White women at?".
Sheeeit, even niglets prefer to play with White dolls.
news.ucr.edu/articles/2022/09/29/liking-anoth
While there is truth to the assertion that a racial beauty bias exists, there appears to be a competing truth that White is the pinnacle of beauty in the eyes of all.
Create the crisis (racial diversity, freakshow coddling)
Present the Orwellian solution.
Anticipate backlash.
Remove Orwellian solution, crisis returns even harder.
People beg for the Orwellian solution.
Happily give them what they demand.
Meanwhile, the real solution goes unmentioned and the people become slaves of Berg Brother.
The honor system only works with an honorable people. No Hajnalite Whites, no functional honor system. More diversity, less honor.
So this tracks with an increasing regularity of US election fraud.
Sounds plausible that might play a role, but then we'd see the most facially beautiful women from races which evolved in year-round cold climates, such as the Eskimos. But that is not the case.
I think certain races simply value facial female beauty more than do other races, and that one will find this favoritism in genocultural regions where monogamy became the norm early on, and men and women stayed together for many years to raise children. A man has to like what he sees of a woman if he sees her all the time.
A test of this hypothesis would be surveys asking men from various countries which female physical attribute they most highly value. Another clue would be surveys of sex positions; hypothetically, face-to-face positions would be less common or less preferred among races that evolved a nonmonagamous sexual market.
He'll change his tune once Bond is black.
Thousand Points of White
...a brilliant harmony, spread like stars, like a thousand points of White in a broad and peaceful sky.
White faces are objectively beautiful (although Orientals have a stated dislike for the "prominent" White nose).
European monogamy exerted a tremendous selection pressure for female beauty (which was then genetically redistributed to sons as well as daughters), because a man who plans to invest all his energy and resources into one woman, foregoing sexual opportunities with other women, will be very careful about the fitness quality of the woman he chooses.
Couple monogamy with a prolonged culling of European hunter-gatherer males during the age of megafauna hunts, and you have a sexual market in which fewer men have more women from which to choose, and those men chose the prettiest women...this is the evolutionary crucible which likely produced our captivating riot of hair and eye colors.
If you dislike the Darwinian explanation, you may lean on the spiritual claim that Whites are the true Israel of the Lord, and our race was blessed by God.
