Where pretty lies perish.
Posted in Comment Winners on Aug 24th, 2012
chris writes : Perhaps one way to conceptualise why women don’t like emotional/sensitive guys would be to consider this. Men value women for their sexual intimacy, while women value men for the emotional intimacy. Now men don’t want a relationship with a woman who is promiscuous with her sexual intimacy as it either indicates she […]
Posted in Comment Winners on Jul 28th, 2012
Comment Winner of the Week goes to “anon”, for using dark humor like a scalpel. She had that director dick inside her and she loved every bit of it. While he was hammering her wet little pussy, he told her what a little slut she was and if her boyfriend was aware that she was […]
Posted in Comment Winners on Jul 4th, 2012
Jodark makes a very good suggestion for men thinking about marrying older careerist broads. If I were considering wifing a middle-aged career woman, I would insist upon a dowry sizable enough to put a 50% down payment on a bitchin’ sports car (probably a new Nissan GTR). I would consider it compensation for her wasting […]
Posted in Comment Winners, Ugly Truths on Apr 26th, 2012
Libertardian (nice nick!) writes : That article clearly struck a major nerve and it saddens me to see Aussie women have fallen prey to the madness as well. One commenter shouts “Karma!” and the reply is: “Karma? For getting an education, having a well-paying job, having some drive, spirit and independence, living life as one […]
Posted in Comment Winners, Girls on Feb 28th, 2012
Days of Broken Arrows hits the solar plexus with his glaring insight : I’ll take this a step further. If a man isn’t around to dominate a woman, a woman will find something else to control her. Her “crazy” schedule which is always overbooked (by her). The demanding boss. Her career in general. Her pets’ […]
Posted in Comment Winners on Feb 5th, 2012
William writes (in relation to the observation that asexual ghouls have a barely concealed hatred for “fuckhounds”): It’s sad how society has beaten down male sexuality to the point where wanting sex is seen in the same light as being obsessed with sex. Self-proclaimed (and self-celebrated) asexuals and feminists have a lot in common. The […]
Posted in Comment Winners, Game on Dec 27th, 2011
Mark C sez: The essence of uncaring assholery is simple. “And?” “I have a boyfriend” “And?” I want to see that chick-flick.” “And?” “You don’t love me” “And?” “you don’t care about my needs” “And?” “I wish you would shave your mustache so I can see your face” “And” “You would look so much better […]
Posted in Comment Winners on Dec 5th, 2011
Jaquan writes: I dont agree with that IQ shit. Im from the hood and very smart in math and physics my favourite subject. Trust me tho homie when it comes to getting hotties im a monster and I respect all your games cuz im a player too and I learned alot from you these last […]
Posted in Comment Winners, The Id Monster, Tool Time on Nov 8th, 2011
Nick S explains the psychology of anti-gamers: In my experience of MRA circles, there seem to be two types who dislike Game. There are the social conservative, often religious, types who are still to some extent emotionally attached to the idea of women being less carnal and more moral, and who dislike more than anything […]
Posted in Comment Winners, Goodbye America, The Id Monster, Ugly Truths on Oct 20th, 2011
King A and I have disagreed before, but I have to tip my hat to a well-executed comment. When sexual submission is not reflected in the culture — female bosses, lawyertwats and women judges, heck, suffrage itself — the culture is permanently unstable. We have tried it their way for a hundred years . Experiment […]
Convenience and ease are the lullabies sung to Whites as they are swaddled in a straitjacket.
The kikes didn't "deal with" the Germans. Their Anglo shabbos mercenaries dealt with the Germans. Talk about Stolen Pallor!
Also, gotta love that yid gratitude. "Thanks, America, for your help! Now here's your orchestrated demise in return."
Also, Mamdani seems to be advocating for highly secure, closed borders. If you aren't from here, then it's "papers please!" before you can buy food.
Funny how that works. You have a single secure border at the national level, or you have many secure borders at the local level.
Either way, borders are the natural order.
It's fair (and easy) to criticize the idea of Whites being objectively the most beautiful race in the world, premised on the counter-argument that each race has an innate preference for the looks of its own people. One could say that Whites are just as biased as all other races to think their own the most comely.
The problem with this tepid take is that we have evidence that races from across the world strive to look White. Indians love to whiten their skin. Orientals get cosmetic surgery to widen their epicanthic folds. The male nigger can't stop asking "where da White women at?".
Sheeeit, even niglets prefer to play with White dolls.
news.ucr.edu/articles/2022/09/29/liking-anoth
While there is truth to the assertion that a racial beauty bias exists, there appears to be a competing truth that White is the pinnacle of beauty in the eyes of all.
Create the crisis (racial diversity, freakshow coddling)
Present the Orwellian solution.
Anticipate backlash.
Remove Orwellian solution, crisis returns even harder.
People beg for the Orwellian solution.
Happily give them what they demand.
Meanwhile, the real solution goes unmentioned and the people become slaves of Berg Brother.
The honor system only works with an honorable people. No Hajnalite Whites, no functional honor system. More diversity, less honor.
So this tracks with an increasing regularity of US election fraud.
Sounds plausible that might play a role, but then we'd see the most facially beautiful women from races which evolved in year-round cold climates, such as the Eskimos. But that is not the case.
I think certain races simply value facial female beauty more than do other races, and that one will find this favoritism in genocultural regions where monogamy became the norm early on, and men and women stayed together for many years to raise children. A man has to like what he sees of a woman if he sees her all the time.
A test of this hypothesis would be surveys asking men from various countries which female physical attribute they most highly value. Another clue would be surveys of sex positions; hypothetically, face-to-face positions would be less common or less preferred among races that evolved a nonmonagamous sexual market.
He'll change his tune once Bond is black.
Thousand Points of White
...a brilliant harmony, spread like stars, like a thousand points of White in a broad and peaceful sky.
White faces are objectively beautiful (although Orientals have a stated dislike for the "prominent" White nose).
European monogamy exerted a tremendous selection pressure for female beauty (which was then genetically redistributed to sons as well as daughters), because a man who plans to invest all his energy and resources into one woman, foregoing sexual opportunities with other women, will be very careful about the fitness quality of the woman he chooses.
Couple monogamy with a prolonged culling of European hunter-gatherer males during the age of megafauna hunts, and you have a sexual market in which fewer men have more women from which to choose, and those men chose the prettiest women...this is the evolutionary crucible which likely produced our captivating riot of hair and eye colors.
If you dislike the Darwinian explanation, you may lean on the spiritual claim that Whites are the true Israel of the Lord, and our race was blessed by God.
