Where pretty lies perish.
Sep 5th, 2018 by CH
Cracks of sunlight through tear-submerged rain.
When I’m old, and memories weighty and small have escaped to the shadows irretrievable, three moments will stay with me, clear and crisp and achingly resonant to the end:
my first fuck
my first love
the day Donald J Trump was elected President.
No one can take these away from me. I cherish them all.
Sep 4th, 2018 by CH
A sharp-eyed observer can’t fail to notice how Game principles extend forward and backward in life, all the way back to early childhood. If you can recall your own childhood, or have opportunity to see tykes at play, a familiar dynamic emerges. The boy (usually just one boy, but may be more) who is least interested in what the little girls are doing, who is totally immersed in his own world, and who will even go so far as to push the girls away when they curiously peak around the periphery of whatever has his attention, is the boy who can’t beat the wee lasses off with a stick.
This will be especially obvious where the little boys are outnumbered by the girls. Early years sex skew produces the same intersex psychological phenomena that is produced by adulthood sex skew. And the hard-to-get challenging little boy is a tot magnet just like the hard-to-get challenging grown man is a thot magnet.
Little girls, just like tig ol bittied growed girls, adore a boy-II-man who makes himself the center of the universe. Girls of all ages can’t resist the fire and ice.
(Ever notice the “bad girls” of yesteryear rock had more femininity than the Lilith Fair femmes of the 90s or the cartoonish slutwalkers of today? Yet another signpost of metastasizing civilizational necrosis.)
So on the zero sum playground, little boys adhere to the Poon Commandments and little girls love them for it. Specifically, Commandments III and VI:
III. You shall make your mission, not your woman, your priority
Forget all those romantic cliches of the leading man proclaiming his undying love for the woman who completes him. Despite whatever protestations to the contrary, women do not want to be “The One” or the center of a man’s existence. They in fact want to subordinate themselves to a worthy man’s life purpose, to help him achieve that purpose with their feminine support, and to follow the path he lays out. You must respect a woman’s integrity and not lie to her that she is “your everything”. She is not your everything, and if she is, she will soon not be anymore.
***
VI. Keep her guessing
True to their inscrutable natures, women ask questions they don’t really want direct answers to. Woe be the man who plays it straight — his fate is the suffering of the beta. Evade, tease, obfuscate. She thrives when she has to imagine what you’re thinking about her, and withers when she knows exactly how you feel. A woman may want financial and family security, but she does not want passion security. In the same manner, when she has displeased you, punish swiftly, but when she has done you right, reward slowly. Reward her good behavior intermittently and unpredictably and she will never tire of working hard to please you.
The fact that cub cads and tiny thots instinctually obey the timeless biomechanical laws of the Poon Commandments strongly suggests that these principles of Game have a solid footing in the deepest, primal parts of human nature, and given that they are in evidence so early in life the later manifestations of it should not come as a shock to anyone but those in a low fertility society who have forgotten the wisdom of the wees.
Game is not socially constructed. Social construction is the effluvia of Game.
PS ¡SCIENCE! agrees! (what else is new?)
Science of dating: why playing hard to get only works for men
Men should play hard to get if they want to attract the opposite sex on a first date otherwise women will see them as unmanly or manipulative, new research has shown.
However women should ‘be nice’ as it will make them appear more feminine in the eyes of the opposite sex.
The research, which only studied straight couples, found that women are suspicious of a man who is too attentive, and are likely to view him as ‘vulnerable and less dominant.’
lol niceguys BTFO.
The studies worked on the basis that people often say that they seek a partner that is “responsive to their needs” and that such a partner would arouse their sexual interest.
However it seems that in the early stages of dating, women are more turned on by unresponsive men.
Professor Gurit Birnbaum of the Interdisciplinary Centre, Israel, said: “We still do not know why women are less sexually attracted to responsive strangers.
I know why, and readers of this blog know why. Perception of female preselection. A standoffish, self-possessed man who isn’t promptly smitten by a hot chick is perceived to be a man who has lots of options in quality and quantity of female company. In Darwinian terms, his seed is likely to birth champions who will find themselves living in a poosy paradise, which means his women can look forward to their genes spreading (heh) farther and wider (heh).
However, in contrast, the advice for women is to ‘play nice’ if they want to attract a male, even though dating Bibles such as ‘The Rules’ suggest they should remain aloof and disinterested.
The first experiment involved 112 single undergraduates aged between 20 and 33 years old who were paired with a member of the opposite sex on a 30 minute ‘date.’
It found that women who were judged to be more friendly and responsive were seen to be more sexually attractive.
Nicegirls are not the flip side of niceguys. What works for men doesn’t usually work for women. This is why Game exists, because there are stark and profound psychosexual differences between the sexes.
Men who interacted with an agreeable and attentive female perceived her as more feminine and as more sexually attractive than did men who found women aloof.
In this corner, we have cheap sperm. It prefers women who signal sexual and romantic availability.
In this corner, we have expensive eggs. It prefers men who signal outcome independence and a surfeit of mate choices.
Ten rounds, no ear biting, and don’t bother placing bets, because there can never be a winner…for long.
PPS Joe Biden and the Pope got a tingle up their legs reading this post.
Sep 2nd, 2018 by CH
I wonder if the perky titted Khan balloon was made/sponsored by the same group that made the Baby Trump balloon. The style looks similar.
Related, word is that Nigel Farage, Britain’s Trump, is being bombarded with requests to run for Mayor of London. This NatPop revolution is just revving up. Shivtastic times ahead.
Sep 2nd, 2018 by CH
A Union Mine High School student is facing battery charges after an altercation in her classroom over a Donald Trump “Make America Great Again” campaign hat, reports CBS Sacramento. In cellphone video, a teacher is seen trying to subdue fired-up 17-year-old senior Jo-Ann Butler after she became enraged at a classmate for wearing the MAGA hat.
She grabbed the hat off his head.
“That’s a racist and hateful symbol,” Butler said.
She is now facing two counts of battery, one on her classmate and one on her teacher, who deputies say she slapped as he escorted her from the room.
“She”.
Know a man by his enemies, and the enemies of President Trump are, nearly to a xir, gargoyles.
Or in this case, the love child of Shrek and Andre the Giant.
***
Sep 2nd, 2018 by CH
A reader asks,
Oh wise CH, what the hell is the matter with Europeans, what makes them so deeply cucked? More specificity, why do the Brits, Germans and Swedes all choose female heads of their states hell-bent on leading them to their destruction? There must be something subtle here I’m missing.
By a quirk of evolution. NW Euros (and perhaps only NW Euros, extending to their diaspora cousins) acquired an exquisitely fine-tuned feeling of empathy that toxically commingles with their compulsion to psychologically project their hyper-domesticated moral sense onto others, which in a Diversitopian nightmare means emotionally identifying with people who are nothing like them and who laugh at their naiveté.
Complementary hypothesis: Prosperity has made White shitlibs decadently soft and mushy-headed, and they have become unable to see the day coming when they won’t have the luxury of virtue signaling for cheap social status anymore.
Same reader,
But they weren’t like this prior to end of WW2, no female heads of state and very few cucked male heads of state. What changed after WW2?
Lag time effect. The self-destructive seed was already embedded in NW Euros, it just needed time to germinate, grow, and yield fruity poz. Oh, and YKW were highly concentrated fertilizer.
Sep 1st, 2018 by CH
The state funeral for this corrupt open borders warmonger sociopath is nauseating, but at least the phony top-down solemnity and pompous audacity of it means the neoliberal elite are scared that their era is over, and the Trumpian realignment is the future of America.
But you know the Chaimstream Media loves Republicans who lose, and they especially love anti-Trump Republicans who bloviate neoliberalogisms, so McAmnesty is /theirguy/ when his death can be used as another prop in their war against Trump and nationalists who resist the plague of globohomoism.
Good riddance to that malevolent cuck, and fitting that the heavens should open up and piss on his coffin as it was carried into the Capitol abattoir of moribund globalist elites.
Aug 31st, 2018 by CH
The Chateau is no longer an outpost in a dark world. The dark world is an outpost of the Chateau.
File under: Ladies, if you act like a slut, you’ll be treated like a slut.
Subcategory: Liberal women, rape fantasies, and the PoundMeToo SMV signaling hysteria: A Theory of Femme.
Why Are Liberal Women More Likely to Report They’ve Been Sexually Harassed?
On Twitter, a guy calling himself Zach Goldberg does these amazing long tweet data dive explorations of hot topics. For example, he has a new one inquiring into why liberal women are more likely to report being sexually harassed than conservative women.
I don’t think he has yet ruled out all other reasonable explanations. For example:
– Liberal women turned liberal because they were sexually harassed. […]
But Goldberg has come up with a barnburner of a correlation I’d never heard of before, which you can read here.
Reposting the Twatter thread here:
The whole thread is worth reading (I’m sure AE would be interested in this treasure trove of sexual market data, given that it was largely pulled from the GSS).
Lascivious Summary: Liberal women are more likely than conservative women to report being sexually harassed, because liberal women are more likely than conservative women to have erotic rape fantasies (i.e., women tingle when they think about being forced to have nonconsensual sex).
Most women have “forcible sex” erotic fantasies, but overeducated liberal women really run with it. And remember, fantasies are based on real desire. If they weren’t, by the property of randomness we would hear of women having sex fantasies about beta males. They don’t.
Other findings: Alcohol and working in an office where one is alone with a lot of relatively alpha male bosses are somewhat predictive of the likelihood of reporting being the “victim” (sneer quotes now backed by hard data) of sexual harassment.
But…
number of sex partners + rape appeal appear to be doing most of the heavy lifting. Unfortunately, this data set did not include a measure of ideology; but the effects of Party ID point in the ‘Democratic’ direction.
I’m working up to something, bear with me.
Another finding: The data don’t necessarily show an increase in workplace sexual harassment in the PoundMeToo era (roughly the past two years); what it shows is an increase in *reports* of sexual harassment. Media saturation coverage of isolated sexual harassment stories grabs women’s attention and motivates them to jump on the sexual harassment victim bandwagon.
That said, considering some of the other media effects I’ve previously shared in the context of perceived discrimination, I do think it’s at least plausible that the salience of the issue in the media–and the concomitant prestige/sympathy that awaits those who claim victimhood–produces these sudden upward swings in the reporting base rate.
In other words, the ‘real’ base rate–i.e. what the average person (i.e. not gender studies majors) would consider sexual harassment–has remained relatively stable overtime, but that media salience + the broadening of the definition (to include even innocuous or unintended behavior) encourages a kind of ‘identity-expressive’/socially motivated reporting.
Propaganda works (especially if the recipients of it are psychologically predisposed to accept the premises of the propaganda because parroting it would increase their social and/or sexual status). In sum, the Chaimstream Media has weaponized the minds, bodies, and souls of our White women.
So here we go with my Theory of Femme. Women are natural attention whores, and shitlib women are the biggest attention whores. As a woman becomes more conservative, she is less interested in attention whoring.
Media propaganda feeds into women’s natural conformism; their need to be socially accepted by the dominant in-group. For shitlib women, this means conforming to shitlib fads, like PoundMeToo. Combine women’s conformism with their attention whoring and media coverage, and you get sexual harassment moral panics.
Furthermore, the attention whoring is really a sexual market value display. Women who claim to be sexually harassed by men are implying that they are so desirable men can’t control themselves in their company. Shitlib women who dream of being erotically raped would, naturally, boost their SMV signal by casting themselves as victims of rape-y men. SMV signaling is reward enough, but shitlib women also get a…tingle…in their nethers when they imagine themselves in the role of the overcome woman who had no choice but to give in to the brutish alpha male.
Here’s the catch: most shitlib women work in fields where they are surrounded by flappy-wristed soyboys and supplicating male feminists. These are not the men erotic rape fantasies are made of. The PoundMeToo cyclical sexual panic can best be seen, then, as a sexual wish fulfillment hysteria coupled with a disgust for the weak males who by convenient proximity would be unwittingly enlisted to play the role of the irresistible, dominating, self-entitled alpha male. Women hate that these soft males are their “fantasy fuel”, so when one of these soys makes an innocuous gesture that can be misinterpreted by a battlecunt with a chip on her shoulder as sexual harassment, they get taken to the she-shed for the requisite social shaming and livelihood destruction.
And now we know why single White women with college degrees — nearly all of them shitlib — signal so hard for open borders to the Brute World. Maybe they aren’t signaling. Maybe…juuuuust maybe….these shitlib chicks want more aggressive men to fill in for the role of the rapist hunk of their deepest starkest sexual fantasies.
That is my Theory of Femme. Someone notify Jordan Peterson and see what he thinks.
In other common sense news, it takes two to tango. If a girl dresses slutty and acts slutty, men will (often enough rightly) assume she is DTF. The failure to communicate only occurs when the slut gets the expected solicirations from betas she’d rather not entertain. This mismatch between endeavor and reward brews toxic spite in sluts, who take it out on all men, making themselves less commitment-worthy with each year closer they careen to cat ladydom.
Aug 30th, 2018 by CH
Shitlib face is real.
Shitlord face is real.
Esssra face is real.
Backpfeifengesicht is real.
PS Subjects could more accurately predict political leaning from “external” face features such as the chin and jawline. Heh. Chinless wonders are rarely MAGA material. But they sure are over-represented among cucks adopting African virtue signaling tokens. (Hi David French!)
Aug 30th, 2018 by CH
CH is on record noting the disturbing trend toward physical and behavioral masculinization of American women. Maybe the Pill is the primary culprit? From the BBC (Big Blubbering Cucks):
With an affordable source of progesterone found [Mexican yams], researchers turned to its uses as a contraceptive. The birth control pill hit the market less than a decade later. Marker, on the other hand, mysteriously disappeared from public life and became obsessed with collecting silver.
Maybe he couldn’t handle the knowledge that he had unleashed one of the Six Sirens of the Sexual Apocalypse?
The economic and social side effects of the pill were as profound as they are well-documented. Sex could be enjoyed without fear of pregnancy. Suddenly women could devote their 20s and 30s to furthering their education and careers, rather than housework and nappies.
Shareholders rejoiced.
But right from the beginning, the pill has had a secret.
In recent years, scientists have started to realise that the brains of women on the pill look fundamentally different. Compared to women who aren’t taking hormones, some regions of their brains seem to be more typically ‘male’.
Whoo boy, buckle up, this ride’s gonna unsettle more than a few feminist snowflakes.
There are behavioural changes, too. Women on certain types of pill aren’t as good at coming up with words – something our gender are usually highly skilled at. On the other hand, they’re better at mentally rotating objects, as is often the case in men. […]
Every brand of combined pill on the market contains the same type of synthetic oestrogen, ethinyl estradiol, and one of eight synthetic progesterones, called progestins. Ethinyl estradiol prevents the body from releasing an egg every month, while progestins thicken the mucus at the entrance to the cervix and conspire to make the womb inhospitable. Even if an egg slips out and becomes fertilised, it won’t be able to settle down and start growing.
So far, so good. But though the hormones are effective at preventing pregnancy, they aren’t perfect matches for our natural hormones. The end result is that these synthetic versions also have effects that you would never get from raw progesterone. […]
The women were sweatier, hairier and spottier. Some noticed that their voices had deepened. Nearly one in five baby girlsborn to mothers taking it had masculinised genitals. Some of these unlucky children required surgery.
Is the Pill the genesis of Clown World trannyism?
Generally speaking, the older, cheaper brands of pill tend to contain androgenic hormones, while newer, more expensive ones tend to contain anti-androgens. This may be one reason that just 17% of women on the combined pill in the US take the anti-androgenic versions.
Is there a class distinction developing between feminine and masculine women?
The scans revealed that several brain areas were larger in the women on the pill, compared to those of women who weren’t. These areas just so happened to be larger in men than women, too.
But gender is a social construction blah blah Hi, My Name Is Feminist!
The study involved a relatively small sample and didn’t separate androgenic and anti-androgenic contraception, so Pletzer cautions against reading too much into the results. But other research has hinted that both types of hormones actually may be changing our behaviour.
Modren society is a crash course in how many endocrine disruptors can be squeezed into the environment (and up SJW buttholes).
Other studies have found that women on oral contraception remember emotional stories more like men – recalling the gist more than the details.
Lol “you never listen” (said by soyhubby to manjawwife)
They’re also not as good at recognising emotions in others, such as anger, sadness, or disgust – just like men. It looks suspiciously like certain types of pill are “masculinising” women’s brains.
Perhaps the most striking evidence, however, comes from a paper published in 2015. This time, Pletzer compared the brains of women on the two types of pill with women who were not. Several brain areas were larger in the women whose pills contained the newer, anti-androgenic progestins.
Crucially, these changes seemed to be affecting their behaviour.
Two brain areas were particularly engorged: the fusiform face area, a region about the size of a pea that processes facial information (from photographs of friends to cartoons), and the parahippocampal place area, which important for recognising places (such as cityscapes). These women were also better at recognising faces.
Hey, let’s mess with the primal forces of human reproduction. What could go wrong?
To complicate matters further, all combined pills contain synthetic oestrogen, which is feminising. This means that the same women may be experiencing both ‘feminising’ and ‘masculinising’ effects on their brains at the same time.
jfc worst of both worlds. You get a passive-aggressive battlecunt. “honey, did you remember our second date anniversary? No? GET THE FUCK OUT NOW BEFORE I DROP A #METOO ON YOUR SORRY BETA ASS”
No one could have predicted that an ugly yam would give rise to a feminist revolution.
Mexico hasn’t been sending its best for a long time.
The pill has repeatedly been called the greatest invention of the 20th Century and is said to be responsible for a third of the increase in women’s wages since the 1960s.
Coincidentally, it’s also been responsible for a third of the decrease in women’s lifetime fertility and lovability.
But contraceptive pills may have a darker side. As Pletzer wrote in 2014, when athletes take steroids we call it ‘doping’ – it’s considered abuse and strongly condemned by society. But we’re happy for millions of women to take these hormones every day, sometimes right through from puberty to menopause.
When you fuck with the laws of Nature, don’t be surprised when Nature fucks you back. The God of Biomechanics will not be denied for long.
Aug 30th, 2018 by CH
What’s next, Fat Imperative?
This is always the trajectory of leftoid equalism. It never stops at begrudging tolerance of the ugly, disfigured, and demented. The Fuggernaut uses tolerance as a springboard for more demands which upend the cosmic order. What is tolerated becomes accepted. What is accepted becomes celebrated. What is celebrated becomes intolerance of its opposite. Until, finally, what is intolerance of its opposite — Truth&Beauty — becomes a demand for Lies and Ugliness to be the new standard of normalcy and definition of virtue.
AKA Harrison Bergeron (<– we are here)
The fix for this broken code in human nature is obvious: never allow “tolerance” to gain a foothold.
A healthy, life-sustaining dose of intolerance for grotesqueries is an ounce of prevention that will prevent a pound of Civil War 2 cure.
***
OT Scintillating CH thought of the day: Shitlibs need to reacquaint themselves with that classic childhood taunt “you smelled it you dealt it”, because every time a shitlib hears a “racist” dog whistle they are unintentionally revealing how often they’ve had those same racist feelings.
In fact, what I’d love to see is the growing and massing shitlord army of Trump acolytes replying “you smelt it you dealt it” whenever a shitlib starts shrieking about le 56% racism.
Butting into this conversation, I have complicated feelings about AI. It is a weapon that we absolutely must not allow the Left to monopolize. The potential to seriously undermine leftoid cultural hegemony via right-wing AI is vast.
But I also know that this is a weapon which in time will destroy us all by ushering into existence the Zero Trust Society and the Zero Employment Economy.
The former is the more likely outcome. For example, imagine AI image generation that can fool even the experts, and then imagine that tech in the hands of anti-Whites, who get to work using AI to retcon our White past with the addition of nonwhites in our photos, videos, and books. Soon, White people could become conditioned to acccept the false memory of a past America that was always majority nonwhite. A massive psy ops of that nature would effectively quell any pockets of White resistance to their racial overrun.
What AI would unleash is the institutionalization of the inability to discern reality from fantasy. People who cannot reliably know truth from fiction in media and government press releases will suffer extreme mental duress, and many will react to this funhouse mirror world by dropping out and re-grounding themselves into very small kinship circles, at the level of hamlets and rural outposts.
People in general just do not sufficiently grasp how utterly awful a zero trust society will be in practice.
Through the ballot box.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
😂😂 I had you going didn't I?
What does a Zero Trust Society look like?
It looks like Mass Surveillance and biometrics.
Colorado's White population is shrinking, and currently sits at 65% of the state total. The beaner population is exploding.
"Despite consistent increases in net migration, Colorado’s future growth is precarious. Since 2021, the increases in migration to Colorado have almost exclusively come from international migration, individuals migrating from outside of the United States directly to Colorado, rather than domestic migration, movement from other states into Colorado."
storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/3aa6968ec7a34ff8
For a while, there was domestic net migration flow into Colorado, driven by White Millennials, but that appears to have tapered off.
Politically, what is happening in CO is similar to what has happened in CA. Conservative Whites left, and liberal Whites remained behind or moved in. As nonwhites (mostly hispanics) quickly began to electorally and geographically displace the Whites, the latter responded by either leaving or becoming even more rabidly anti-racist.
This is not a surprising reaction, because it reflects an all too common Stockholm Syndrome attitude toward racial displacement:
"If I overtly express my support for the beaners, they will treat me well and the other liberal Whites won't exile me for wrongthink."
If that's what Kavanaugh wrote or implied, then he's basically saying what all of us are thinking: that too much of our national policy is being foisted on the judiciary to decide.
Which is correct, but also highlights the sheer unlikelihood of Congress legislating anything that directly benefits White America. Congress' inability to do its job is not so much the result of institutional inertia as it is the consequence of an upside-down judaized morality that prevents the passing of common sense legislation.
Who is more anti-social? The man driving the oversized pickup truck with the pissing Calvin sticker on it, or the woman screaming at you like a banshee for saying trannies should not be public school teachers?
I see anti-social people everywhere.
Over 40% of food packaged and sold in the US is kosher.
jews are 2% of the US population.
In effect, Whites are paying a jew tax on their grocery purchases that they did not want nor vote for.
Whites are paying the Jewzya.
Are the Whites or the niggers winning the World Cup?
I wonder if, at this point, the MAGA red cap does nothing but signal performative spitefulness, and that this perception of neutered rebellion encourages leftoids of either sex but mostly women to make public spectacles of themselves lashing out at MAGA hat wearing White dudes.
If White men were to, instead, brazenly occupy the public square in Hugo Boss SS aesthetics and a happy smile, it would signal intent of purpose, and some of these crazy White women might be more circumspect when confronted by their presence.
"Every woman yearns to submit, but only to he who is worthy of her submission"
lol damn imagine her reaction if he was wearing a swastika cap.
A sizable chunk of our chunkoid White women are mentally unwell. Deranged, even. They are spiraling into psychotic breakdowns.
I blame romance novel porn and flagrant Dunbar Number expansionism.
