• About
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon

Chateau Heartiste

Where pretty lies perish.

Feed on
Posts
Comments

The Four Sirens Of The Sexual Apocalypse

Mar 17th, 2016 by CH

A long, long time ago, in a pleasure dome far away, CH introduced the idea that the West is currently besieged by the Four Sirens of the Sexual Apocalypse.

So why are women now the eager instigators of divorce? What changed in the culture? Four things, primarily: the pill, easy divorce, women’s economic independence, and rigged laws that make divorce a good financial prospect for women. The four sirens of the sexual apocalypse together have created the perfect sociological storm where a woman has every incentive in the world to ditch a husband to follow the whims of her heart once his usefulness has been exhausted.

Later, CH expanded on the Four Sirens theme.

  1. Effective and widely available contraceptives (the Pill, condom, and the de facto contraceptive abortion).
  2. Easy peasy no-fault divorce.
  3. Women’s economic independence (hurtling towards women’s economic advantage if the college enrollment ratio is any indication).
  4. Rigged feminist-inspired laws that have caused a disincentivizing of marriage for men and an incentivizing of divorce for women.

Two secondary Sirens were added to round out the list:

  • Penicillin (reduced the cost of contracting STDs)
  • Widely available hardcore porn.

Probably of all the CH scribblings on this subject of Western Decline, this passage gets to the meatiest heart of it:

So, a crib sheet of quippy replies if you ever need it to send a feminist or manboob howling with indignation:

1. The Pill
2. No-fault divorce
3. Working women
4. Man-hating feminism
5. Penicillin
6. Porn

Toss into a social salad bowl already brimming with an influx of non-European immigrants thanks to the 1965 soft genocide act, mix thoroughly, and voila!: a huge, inexorable, relentless leftward shift in American politics, an explosion of single moms, wage stagnation, government growth, upper class childlessness, lower class dysgenics, and a creaking, slow deterioration in the foundational vigor of the nation and the gutting of the pride of her people.

Into this pot pie of portent throw in the Skittles Man, Bring the Movies Man, Nah Man, and Disappeared Again Man, for whom girls have always swooned but who now, thanks to relaxed pressure from women themselves requiring men to put a ring on it before getting any huggy or kissy, and the incentivizing of risky sexual behavior by government policy and contraceptive technology, could enjoy sex without the entanglement of marriage or gainful employment.

Game, for all the shit it gets from the usual suspects, was just a rational response to a radically altered playing field. It didn’t cause this calamity; it just profited from it.

Meanwhile, beta males are left scratching their block-like skulls, wondering what the fuck just happened.

All well and good, says the reader, but where is the ¡SCIENCE! buttressing all this speculation and real world observation to satisfy sperg demands? How about right here. (Via The Cheapest of Chalupas)

Family structure in the United States has shifted substantially over the last three decades, [HBDer: MUH GENETICS] yet the causes and implications of these changes for the well-being of family members remains unclear. This paper exploits task-based shifts in demand as an exogenous shock to sex-specific wages to demonstrate the role of the relative female to male wage in the family and labor market outcomes of women. I show that increases in the relative wage lead to a decline in the likelihood of marriage for those on the margin of a first marriage, and present suggestive evidence that these effects are concentrated among less-desirable matches. A higher relative wage also causes women to increase their hours of work, reduce their dependence on a male earner, and increase the likelihood of taking guardianship over their children. These findings indicate that improvements in the relative wage have facilitated women’s independence by reducing the monetary incentive for marriage, and can account for 20% of the decline in marriage between 1980 and 2010.

BOOM THERE IT IS. CH WAS RIGHT. Female economic self-sufficiency decreases the marriage rate and increases urban slut factory churn, because self-sufficient women need beta male bux less and therefore can indulge the chasing of alpha male fux more.

SCIENCE! has confirmed the existence of Le Chateau Heartiste’s Third Siren of the Sexual Apocalypse.

It’s like some people think I make this shit up outta thin air. No, I’ve just spent a lot of time in the trenches of the dating market. I have seen much. I have learned much. And my wisdom is infinite. YUGE, even.

You only had to listen.

***

“Ok, enough crowing. How about a solution?”

Sure. Here it is:

Repeal the 19th Amendment.

Maybe slightly more realistically, get rid of Title IX and the rest of the man-hating, human nature denying, legal fictions shoved down our throats in the last sixty odd years by rancid feminist cunts and their lackey low T manlets. Culturally, real progress can be made by simply ending the GRRLPOWER propaganda and returning to teaching the virtues of the masculine ideal. Too many boys in STEM? Great! That’s what boys are good at. Too many girls preferring marriage and stay-at-home mohterhood? Great! That’s what girls are good at.

Simple truths and simple beauties have more power than labyrinthine lies and grotesque ugliness, as long as you hold them close to a heart that has banished cowardice.

Posted in Biomechanics is God, Culture, Girls, Ugly Truths, Vanity | 204 Comments »

Paging Gas Buttox…

Mar 17th, 2016 by CH

fartsmeller


Comments are closed.

Posted in Funny/Lolblogs, Goodbye America | 40 Comments »

Cuckstablishment SuperCuck John Cucksich Performed His Duties As Instructed

Mar 16th, 2016 by CH

Why is John “Cat Lady” Kasich — he who dribbles tepid platitudes like “migrants are made in the image of the Lord” and wants to hoard millions of them in the US as if they were stray cats — even in the GOP nomination race? He won’t win another state. Ohio was his hunchbacked cri de coeur. A 1-for-29 winning streak that can only get worse from here. Not to mention, the whole “aw shucks golly gee willikers” facade to dupe placid Midwesterners is just that; Cucksich is in reality a mean-spirited prick.

So what’s his angle? Obviously, he was employed as a GOPe suicide bomber. His job was to flush 66 delegates down the toilet so Trump couldn’t get them, increasing the hopes of the cuck traitors of a brokebacked convention that would cut Trump off from the nomination. Scum of the earth, these cucks, and how much clearer does it have to be shown to middle and working class Whites that their putative representatives in truth hate them with a passion and do nothing for them but make their lives worse?

Over on Twatter, Dick Brisket (@EmpireOfJeff) puts it well.

1. Consider: Kasich knows he has no shot at winning the nomination. So why would he stay in the race? It’s pretty simple, if depressing.

2. The GOPe has promised him some political plum in exchange for his help in keeping Trump from winning 1,237 delegates.

3. This is exactly the type of back-room dealing and betrayal of the voters’ wishes that got Rubio rejected so soundly.

4. It’s not that the GOP hasn’t learned. It’s that they hate you, resent even having to pay lip service to your demands, and now you’ll pay.

5. It may be suicidal for the party, but they don’t care. They will NOT share power with those they consider beneath them.

6. So what does that mean for the GOP? They’re finished. Expect at least 2 parties to emerge after this debacle. One Tea Partyish, one Estab.

7. Does this mean some time in the wilderness for conservatives? Of course it does. There was never any savior coming to fix our problems.

8. The country is now >50% Free Shitter. Hillary was president as soon as she announced her candidacy. That’s the America we live in.

Two thoughts. One, Hillary is not a shoe-in. Most Dems are secretly worried the most about Trump as a general election opponent. Trump has tremendous cross-over appeal that the GOP haven’t seen from their candidates since, oh, Reagan.

Two, Kasich was the Cucksters’ Last Stand. They don’t have any bullets left in the chamber. And I don’t think it will stumpening the Trumpening. At worst, the cuck show limps along all the way to the convention with Trump holding a comfortably large plurality of delegates, just shy of the 1,237 needed to lock the nom down. If the cucks’ menstrual flow hasn’t stopped by then, a GOPe split is a real possibility. I give it 40% chance at this point.

Either outcome — GOPe schism or GOPe acquiescence to Trump — means the end of the reign of “liberals are the real racists!” cucks. You could call it a Cuckularity. And it will be good.

Posted in Current Events, Globalization, Goodbye America, Tool Time | 246 Comments »

Takeaway Game (Celebrity Edition)

Mar 16th, 2016 by CH

Jason Sudeikis picked up hottie Olivia Wilde and eventually made her his fiancee by employing a classic Game technique known as the takeaway.

Olivia recounted,

I remember I was on the dance floor [at an SNL afterparty] and everybody was dancing around me and they just seemed really happy and I was just kinda standing there. … He came up to me and said, “You know, whatever you’re looking for, you don’t need it,” and he just walked away. … He played it really cool.

Very nice. This a a great example of what I call the Three Stage Opener:

  1. The cocky approach
  2. The ambiguous opener
  3. The leave of absence

All three work in concert, reinforcing each stage’s potency. The cocky, confident approach (with based body language) instantly intrigues the woman. She wants to find out if you are what your lion’s stride suggests you are: a predator of pussy.

The ambiguous opener forces the woman to mentally (and emotionally) invest in you. She has to think about what you’re saying, and this raises your value to her because she’s not going to examine the words of a man unworthy of her attention. The best ambiguous openers skirt the line of flattery, playing with hints of sexual interest, but leavened with a subtle backhanded compliment (aka a neg). In this example, Sudeikis has insinuated Wilde is a) hot and b) desperate for validation. It’s really the perfect neg, flush with patronizing amusement, guaranteed to send female rationalization hamsters into orbit.

Finally, the takeaway; the drop the mic move of seduction. Nothing makes a woman hornier or more curious than a man who has made his presence known… and then made it unknown. The sudden detachment — the dread inducement — will drive most women crazy with the need for resolution. I have experienced women CHASING AFTER ME to resolve my unexpected and unannounced departure. The takeaway QUICKLY puts a man in the courtship driver’s seat, and can keep him there a long time with its strategic application as needed. No woman wants to feel like somehow, some way, she turned you off or bored you, and will work hard to prove she can keep your interest.

Meanwhile, low sexual market value Slate feminists can’t even:

Slate’s personnel are divided on whether Sudeikis’ pick-up attempt was creepy, just plain clumsy, or a halfway decent crack at flirtation—Wilde seems to have liked it,

Femcunt tears, they flow like a menstrual discharge.

Flirting with a stranger means imposing yourself on their space and time, with no indication of their disposition or dislikes. That makes for a very fine line between skeevy and sweet.

Yes, flirting means imposing. It’s called BUSTAMOVE, and men who don’t are doomed to incel.

There are no hard-and-fast rules when it comes to romance, but telling a woman what she does or does not need is not a promising start.

Except it is a promising start, as we can see by Olivia Wilde’s swoon and betrothal that betrayed the sisterhood of the ya ya pantsuits.

Posted in Game | 135 Comments »

Donald Trump’s Stone Cold Truths About Women

Mar 15th, 2016 by CH

I’ll let you in on a leetle secret. It wasn’t Trump’s policy positions that initially roused my enthusiasm for his prospects as a cuckstablishment destroyer. Yes, the Wall and the rest of it certainly sealed the deal, but it was Trump’s charisma — his Game — that I noticed first and, based on my judgment then, would be the pure energy that carried him to victories innumerable. I have since been vindicated.

Trump’s Game is evident in the facility with which he handles friends and foes alike, but for astonishingly confirming evidence, one should look to the archives of Trump’s statements on female nature. The man clearly knows the score.

Shitlibs faint with the “I can’t even” vapors at the sight of Trump’s knowledge droppage, but we who operate in the dating trenches nod knowingly and recognize Trump as one of us: the few, the proud, the poonlords.

Here’s a selection of Trumpening Truths about women:

I would never buy Ivana any decent jewels or pictures. Why give her negotiable assets?

Trump gets that all’s fair in love and divorce.

Beauty and elegance, whether in a woman, a building, or a work of art, is not just superficial or something pretty to see.

Trump knows that Beauty is Truth, and Ugliness is Lies.

26,000 unreported sexual assaults in the military-only 238 convictions. What did these geniuses expect when they put men & women together?

Trump understands that men and women are different in mind as well as body.

It’s certainly not groundbreaking news that the early victories by the women on ‘The Apprentice’ were, to a very large extent, dependent on their sex appeal.

Pretty women can cash in their looks for fabulous prizes. And they do.

You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.

Self-evidently true.

There are basically three types of women and reactions. One is the good woman who very much loves her future husband, solely for himself, but refuses to sign the [prenup] agreement on principle. I fully understand this, but the man should take a pass anyway and find someone else. The other is the calculating woman who refuses to sign the prenuptial agreement because she is expecting to take advantage of the poor, unsuspecting sucker she’s got in her grasp. There is also the woman who will openly and quickly sign a prenuptial agreement in order to make a quick hit and take the money given to her.

Trump is familiar with the female archetypes. He is also familiar with the CH maxim “Always be ready to walk. It’s a man’s best defense against scheming broads”.

Women have one of the great acts of all time. The smart ones act very feminine and needy, but inside they are real killers. The person who came up with the expression ‘the weaker sex’ was either very naive or had to be kidding. I have seen women manipulate men with just a twitch of their eye — or perhaps another body part.

The greatest con feminism ever pulled was the idea that women are powerless pawns in the resource-acquisition market.

[Angelina Jolie’s] been with so many guys she makes me look like a baby… And, I just don’t even find her attractive.

Trump is a based slut shamer. He knows that cock-ravaged sluts have lowered their value as marriage material. #NoHymenNoDiamond

My favorite part [of ‘Pulp Fiction’] is when Sam has his gun out in the diner and he tells the guy to tell his girlfriend to shut up. Tell that bitch to be cool. Say: ‘Bitch be cool.’ I love those lines.

Trump is well aware of sexual dynamics, and that a real man is in charge of his woman. Beta males get steamrolled.

During one down period, I referred to him in print as a ‘financially embattled thousandaire’ and he sent me a copy of the column with my picture circled and ‘The Face of a Dog!’ written over it.

Fucking LOL. If the ugly shoe fits…

Women find [my] power almost as much of a turn-on as [my] money.

The stoniest, coldest truth. Chicks dig power. Men dig beauty. Trump is a student of the immutable cosmic laws governing the sexes.

All of the women on ‘The Apprentice’ flirted with me — consciously or unconsciously. That’s to be expected.

Trump assumes the sale. A sterling demonstration of a classic Game technique.

Bonus TrumpenTruth!

Women: “You have to treat ’em like shit.” (New York magazine, Nov. 9, 1992)

And here the Trumpening completes the circle with the Chateau. A maestro of the muff, Trump has internalized one of the Chateau’s timeless truths: Every girl loves a jerkboy fascist. They can’t help themselves. All the quisling, mewling betaboys can do is nip at the Asshole Alpha’s ankles, inflamed with envy as they go home at night to be reminded of their low sexual worth by the sight of their fat and dumpy wives (or gay lovers).

Donald Trump is the father and role model every young boy would be blessed to have, especially the little shitlib boys. May the Lord guide him and help him achieve the ultimate AMOG of America’s pissant cucks: the White House throne.

Posted in Alpha, Girls, Ugly Truths | 189 Comments »

National Review’s Resident Cuckmug Kevin D. Williamson Pens Racist Screed

Mar 14th, 2016 by CH

Check out these excerpts from Kevin D. Williamson’s latest National Review article. I can’t believe they give him a platform to print this racist trash!

National Review’s Kevin Williamson believes Hillary Clinton’s appeals to African-Americans are “immoral” because that demographic’s way of life deserves to die out. […]

Williamson, a long-time critic of The Harridan, essentially agrees that he doesn’t support any policies or rhetoric directly tailored to African-Americans — particularly about jobs being taken by outsourcing and immigration — because it would be wrong to do so.

“It is immoral because it perpetuates a lie: that the African-Americans that find themselves attracted to Clinton have been victimized by outside forces,” the NR roving correspondent writes. “[N]obody did this to them. They failed themselves.”

He then goes on to state that all the ills associated with downscale blacks are a result of that race’s inherent depravity.

“If you spend time in hardscrabble, black Detroit, or Ferguson, MO, or my own native Texas bathhouse, and you take an honest look at the welfare dependency, the drug and alcohol addiction, the family anarchy—which is to say, the whelping of human children with all the respect and wisdom of a stray dog—you will come to an awful realization. It wasn’t Beijing. It wasn’t even Washington, as bad as Washington can be. It wasn’t immigrants from Mexico, excessive and problematic as our current immigration levels are. It wasn’t any of that,” Williamson states.

He then goes on to make the conclusion that it’s great these communities are dying out because they have a warped morality and are a dead weight on the economy.

“The truth about these dysfunctional, downscale black communities is that they deserve to die. Economically, they are negative assets. Morally, they are indefensible,” the conservative writer says. “The African-American under-class is in thrall to a vicious, selfish culture whose main products are misery and murder. Hillary Clinton’s speeches make them feel good. So does crack cocaine. What they need isn’t analgesics, literal or political. They need real opportunity, which means that they need real change, which means that they need U-Haul. If you want to live, get out of Atlanta [a heavily-black town in Georgia].”

If you haven’t figured it out yet, Williamson’s racist screed was actually aimed at Whites. Just substitute “whites” and “white working class” everywhere you read “blacks” and “African-Americans”. The racism against Whites gets published; the version of it with “blacks” replacing “whites” would get Williamson fired from National Cucktacular and his penis-shaped head on millions of network broadcasts as the featured “two minutes hate” antiracism whipping cur (which he’d probably enjoy).

Prying into Williamson’s GRidS, I can think of at least three motivations for this latest Williamson article revealing his hatred of BadWhites who don’t genuflect before the MLK monument or rave about the unconventional conservatism of piss porn.

  1. The article is an elaborately insincere troll of the foes he really hates: the “White identity” alt-right. In this reading, Williamson appears to be sarcastically mocking an assumed hypocrisy among White identitarians to support the White working class against elite machinations while simultaneously blaming blacks’ miseries on their race’s inherent deficiencies. The premise is flawed, though, because it relies for its ideological grounding, like all cuck declarations do, on the religion of race creationism (i.e., the belief that evolution stopped at the neck up and the skin down and that therefore all races are equal in every way except on the most superficial traits). The alt-right recognizes intra-race as well as inter-race differences in aptitude and character, and understands that this fundamental view is not incompatible with the indictment that the ruling class and their lackeys push policies that bring unnecessary hardship to the non-ACELA classes. This worldview is a far more consistent stance than anything the cuck-right has attempted to elucidate.
  2. Williamson is psychologically projecting his hatred of black dysfunction onto Whites. He’s too cowardly to come out and say “blacks are violent and allergic to civilized norms of behavior” so he sublimates his hatred into a rage against the White working classes who, for all their faults, are nowhere near the level of dysfunction that your typical majority-black ghetto exhibits.
  3. Williamson is a gay homosexual who was rejected by his redneck Texan father, and his slanders against the White working class are essentially an elaborate F YOU DAD act of negative transference.

Whatever Williamson’s psychological peculiarities, his stated and implied reasons for hating working class Whites are utterly bankrupt. Non-elite White men aren’t coddled like blacks and hispanics and women. There is no affirmative action for non-elite White men. No government contract set-asides. No 24/7 mass media engine to blame all their woes on nonWhite racism and celebrate their White working class cultural contributions to America. No White Lives Matter or Black Privilege movements to shore up their egos and make them feel like under-appreciated valued members to society. No education industrial complex to glorify their history (or make it up if insufficiently glorious) and to simultaneously diminish the history of nonWhites.

But Keven D. Williamson knows all this. He’s just doesn’t care. Which makes him a dirtbag. Nothing more.

He’d better hope that when his dreamed-of Diversitopia in America is fully realized, that the numerically overwhelming nonWhite races, whom I guarantee won’t share his ACELA Whites’ pathologically cucked impulse to leapfrog moral loyalties to outsider races, keep him around as the funny-looking court faggot instead of feeding him alive to a pit of crocodiles like they do to Boer farmers.

Posted in Psy Ops, The Id Monster, Tool Time | 296 Comments »

The Leftoid Phenotype

Mar 13th, 2016 by CH

These two Trump haters are representative of so many of their kind.

antitrumplets

A masculine woman and a feminine man. The sexual polarities reversed, flipping a giant upside-down middle finger to the divine order. Mangrrls and girlbois are the classic leftoid phenotype. They carry the baggage of their scarred psyches on their punchable faces. A sick people steering a sick society to a sick bed.

Posted in Culture, Tool Time, Ugly Truths | 187 Comments »

Spot The F*ck Me Stare

Mar 11th, 2016 by CH

thesexmestare

While you’re at it, see if you can spot the “I’m a witchy cunt” stare, too.

Posted in Current Events, Funny/Lolblogs, Girls, The Id Monster | 255 Comments »

The Great Men On The Welfare State

Mar 11th, 2016 by CH

Bertrand Russell is a patron sadist of Chateau Heartiste for good reason; when he’s on, he’s quite good at cataloguing the ills that befall those cultures which turn their backs to the gods of the copybook headings. Here he is on the welfare state and its corruption of the sexual market:

bertierussellquote

If you got a chill reading this, that’s normal. You see how prophetic Russell was — the rise of single momhood, the destruction wrought by the divorce industrial complex, the encroachment of leftoid authoritarianism, the disavowal of kin and country — and you fear what is to come next.

Posted in Biomechanics is God, Culture, Goodbye America, Love, Ugly Truths | 56 Comments »

All The Single Ladies Are Pushing America Over The Leftist Cliff

Mar 10th, 2016 by CH

Single momhood is up. The marriage rate is down. The age of first marriage is up. And the divorce industrial complex provides incentives to women to shatter marriages that would have survived similar rough patches not too long ago.

What does this distressed state of frayed affairs portend for America? How about a rapid and continual shift in the electorate toward Leftism and all its attendant social ills.

Why have women become Left-Wing? The political gender gap and the decline in marriage.

The last three decades have witnessed the rise of a political gender gap in the United States wherein more women than men favor the Democratic party. We trace this development to the decline in marriage, which we posit has made men richer and women poorer. [ed: this is not necessarily true. controlled analysis of actual living standards post-divorce support a less financially stable position for men. and the *perception* of financial gain matters; women perceive, due to legal incentives, that they will gain more in a divorce.] Data for the United States support this argument. First, there is a strong positive correlation between state divorce prevalence and the political gender gap—higher divorce prevalence reduces support for the Democrats among men but not women. Second, longitudinal data show that following marriage (divorce), women are less (more) likely to support the Democratic party.

Divorced men don’t stop voting Democrat because they are in a better financial position than they were in marriage; rather, they stop voting Democrat because the Democrat Party supports the whole panoply of anti-male feminist policy preferences that tilt the divorce playing field against men’s interests. Burn a divorced man once, shame on him. Burn him twice….

The real reason single women — pre-marriage and post-divorce — more strongly support the Shitlib Party is because they are biologically compelled to seek a male provider and his resources when they are mate-less. If no dependable or asset-rich man is available, then single and divorced women, and especially single moms with future juvenile delinquent and roadside stripper mouths to feed, will seek resources from the best available alternative: Big Daddy Government.

Consequently, as the nation loads up with more sex and the city mimosaettes and platitude-quaffing obese single moms of mystery meats, the bigger government will grow to satisfy the demand for more free first date dinners of dem welfare programs. And that is how the culture substrate changes absent any widespread genetic changes in the population, (which will follow not long after a massive and prolonged culture change).

Moral of the SCIENCE!: Female suffrage was a big mistake.

Posted in Girls, Goodbye America, Ugly Truths | 159 Comments »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

  • PHOTO BLOGS

    Goodbye, America (in a photo)
    Welcome Back, America
  • Donate

  • Archives

  • Gab Feed

    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      Shiloh is very fetching. I like the look she's going for here. Kind of a cross between tradlass and gothgirl. Sultry temptress of the harvest?

      Anyhow, I notice she has prudently covered her arm sleeve tats. Like it or not, people judge on that stuff. Shiloh shows smarts and savvy by playing to the sympathies of the courtroom, or at least avoiding the possibility of anyone in the courtroom making negative snap judgements about her.

      I hope she is freed from this grotesque railroading and then goes on to sue the state for millions. I hear the jury is mostly women. If it's a bunch of nigs, she's doomed. If it's middle-aged or unattractive liberal White women, she might be equally screwed. Women can be quite spiteful toward their sexual competition.

      3 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      This video still is high art. o/

      3 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      White crime stats are inflated with this racial category switcheroo to demoralize Whites, and beaner crime stats are reduced to leave the impression that the beaner invasion is not increasing crime in the US.

      Ron Unz wept.

      3 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      Dennis Kucinich is based. In every way.

      https://collegepill.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/elizabeth-kucinich-9.jpg

      3 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      Orcas are the world's apex predator. They wear dead salmon as hats. They drape seal intestines over their fins for fun. They hunt great white sharks so ruthlessly that the sharks flee their natural hunting grounds. They play with their food.....in a thousand bits. Literally. Orcas have been known to ram large fish so hard that the prey explodes. The buffet line is open for the whole orca family!

      Intelligent, sociable, merciless killers who toy with lesser creatures. The Orca should be on the White Ethnostate flag of the future.

      3 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      The jewniparty desperately wants mass amnesty. The only reason they haven't yet pulled the trigger on it is because neither side of the jewniparty wants to take the blame for it. So a game is being played where Dems get to whine about immigrant rights and Repubs get to complain about the criminal element while each side quietly searches for the right softening rheoric and the opportune time to agree to an amnesty.

      As usual, Whites are left without any real representation.

      4 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      True, race-mixing is actually a little bit more common among White men than it is among White women. The differences are notable, however.

      White women tend to miscegenate with nonwhite species that are far from the White norm, eg negroes, jeets, dune coons, and the blacker spics.

      White men more typically miscegenate with whiter-Latinas and with Orientals. This is not quite as repugnant to the White senses, although it is still inferior to same-race coupling.

      The other big difference is a consequence of the biology of each sex. When White men miscegenate, they don't get pregnant. They can conceivably knock up White women side pieces or return to White women to make White babies.

      In sharp contrast, when White women miscegenate, they get pregnant and are out of the mate market for a long time (nine months plus a few years they spend all their energy raising the monstrous infant or toddler). A White woman pregnant with a mixed-race abomination cannot just go and have a White baby with a White man. Worse, when she births the frizzbomb, the presence of it will actively turn off White men, robbing her of yet more opportunities to redeem herself by snagging a White man.

      Consequently, many years of her fertility are sacrificed and she suffers a much larger opportunity cost to have a White baby than would be the case for a race-mixing White man.

      It strikes modrens as unfair, but these are sociobiological realities, and Nature does not care about our ideas of fairness. A woman's womb is simply more precious to the tribe than is a man's sperm.

      4 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      The direction of causation runs both ways. In sexual politics, it takes two to tango. That's what makes the problem so seemingly intractable. White men and women must meet in the middle, or it won't work out. Women have to show loyalty (sexual and racial fidelity). Men have to show strength (hierarchical dominance and social supremacy).

      The catch is that the entire societal machinery of Weimerica has made it impossible and downright dangerous for White men to tap into those masculine virtues, while it has made it exceedingly easy and personally beneficial for White women to abandon their virtues.

      4 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      This is known as Pawgatory.

      4 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      White women will not get White men's strength until White men are assured White women's loyalty.

      This is the bind. My suggestion: Name and shame the White woman race traitors. Women respond to mockery and to social shunning. It will be more effective if the shaming coomes from other White women, but any bit of shaming will help.

      Ultimately, the jewish control of our racial mythos and public discourse will have to be dismantled for White women to fully heal from their self-destruction indoctrination.

      4 days ago

    View on Gab →

  • Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.

  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • PAGES

    About
    Alpha Assessment Submissions
    Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    Dating Market Value Test For Men
    Dating Market Value Test For Women
    Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    Shit Cuckservatives Say
    The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon

  • Recent Comments

    • markgm28 on Ministry Of Twatter
    • Augustus on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
    • r1verboatgambler on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
    • Ironsides on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
    • r1verboatgambler on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
  • Categories

  • GAME

    60 Years of Challenge
    Alpha Game
    Krauser PUA
    Rational Male
    Roosh V
    Tenmagnet
    Treatise of Love

  • MAGA MEN

    Alternative Right
    AmRen
    Anonymous Conservative
    Audacious Epigone
    Dusk in Autumn
    Education Realist
    Evo and Proud
    Gene Expression
    Hail to You
    Hawaiian Libertarian
    Lion of the Blogosphere
    My Posting Career
    PA World and Times
    Page for men
    Parapundit
    Rogue Health and Fitness
    Steve Sailer
    The Anti-Gnostic
    The Kakistocracy
    The Red Pill Review
    Unqualified Reservations
    Vox Popoli
    West Hunter
    Whiskey’s Place

  • SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS

    Alias Clio
    Arts & Letters Daily
    Deconstructing Leftism
    Feminine Beauty
    hbd chick
    Human Biological Diversity
    Library of Hate
    Overcoming Bias
    Stuff White People Like

  • TOP POSTS

    • Ministry Of Twatter
    • America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
    • Women Are Anathema To Revolutionary Movements
    • ¡SCIENCE! Externally Validates CH Poon Commandment VIII
    • 1984 Was A Starter’s Guide

Chateau Heartiste © 2026 All Rights Reserved.

Free WordPress Themes


Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion