Feed on
Posts
Comments

Comey Sent Homey

Trump fired FBI Director and Derp State cog in the Gay Mulatto machine Jim Comey. My first reaction was “It’s about time!”, but now that I’ve had a moment to reflect I think Trump’s timing was perfect. He waited until after the recent Capitol Hill testimony with Clapper, who once again had to admit there was no evidence (with the politicized “yet” implied) of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, thus giving Trump a handy soundbite reason for the firing.

Trump’s signed dismissal letter to Comey was savage. A most public of public humiliations. It has earned Trump the coveted Shiv of the Week (his first? CH archivists are busy confirming).

LEGENDS OF BRUTALITY. One must appreciate Trump’s secondary shiv slipped between the ventricles of the media-dem grouplove reacharound alliance, where he reminds them that Comey had thrice informed Trump he wasn’t under investigation, before tearing Comey’s heart out by concurring with the DOJ’s judgement of Comey’s ineffectiveness.

This comment from jimbojones had me chuckling,

Comey had to go after his shenanigans over the last 12 months. The only thing Trump should be blamed for is that he didn’t fire Comey earlier. Though a firing this prominent requires political capital – it’s not an easy thing to do.

The Democrats, by the way, are now deeply divided. Half of them think that Trump is profoundly disloyal for firing the man who put him in the White House. And the other half think that Trump is trying to cover up the nefarious and so far invisible Russian intervention. They are, however, united in having forgotten that they all called for Comey’s head last November.

Goodbye, Comey, you freak! I wonder if we will ever know what the hell you were doing. I personally think you didn’t know, either.

I have inside info through let’s say two degrees of acquaintance that Comey is a die-hard shitlib and slavish thecunt lackey. You can bet that had Trump not fired this Creep State operative he would have had to endure eight years of Comey publicly preening about his ongoing Russia investigation and undermining Trump’s agenda every step of the way. In other words, if you want that Trump Wall, Comey had to fall.

Strategically, Trump also waited until he had the gallows rolled in for treasonous scumbag Democreeps to hang themselves with their own rope. For instance, here’s Cryin’ Chuck Schumer (a slithery venomous reptile even by the standards of his ilk) hating Comey before loving Comey.

And that bully went HA HAAW. There’s so much more in this vein. A cottage industry exists of shitlords trawling Twatter for reams of contradicting pronouncements on Comey from Democreeps who hated him before they thought he was an ally giving credence to their Trump Derangement Syndrome.

How bad is the snarklib “who, whom?” inconsistency and hypocrisy? Check this: phaggalicious Colbert’s studio audience initially cheered with approval when Colbert announced Comey’s firing, before realizing they were supposed to boo when Colbert corrected them that Comey had been fired at the behest of AG Sessions. Congratulations, Colbert, your audience is a freak show of emotionally incontinent tards who can’t think for themselves.

Back to Trump, you can bet he’s sitting in a very strong position to make this ballsy move. The Russia stuff was never credible, and Trump knew it. He let the Dems walk out to the edge of insanity with their RUSSIA PUTIN shrieking, and now they’ll only triple down on it, cause what else have they got? The typical Democreep was calling for Comey’s ouster when they were accusing him of throwing the election to Trump, and now they’re Team Comey when they think his dismissal benefits Trump. The normie American will see right through this tribalistic Fake Outrage by the Left.

Trump is setting the stage for another Dem catastrophe in the midterms. Shit is gonna start coming out now about the mulatto’s program of illicit surveillance of Trump and surrogates. The leaks by rank-and-file agents who hated Comey’s partisanship and grandstanding will flow like a river. I expect the DC drama to get much uglier, and there’s no possible resolution that helps the Dems.

Comey’s tenure was doomed in the Trump Era. Just remember what this guy did for the mincing mulatto.

Comey earned his firing on July 5th of last year, when he went along with Loretta Lynch’s fiction that it was up to him to decide whether or not to seek prosecution of Hillary Clinton. That wasn’t his job, and it is not within the scope of the AGs powers to delegate her powers to the FBI director. He was providing political cover for the Obama administration and the Democratic party. Trump was right to fire him. He would have been right to fire him on January 20th.

You don’t kill the snake by grabbing its tail. That only enrages it. You aim for the snakehead. The writhing body will arterially expunge traitorous obamacrats once the head is gone. Trump flexed his power with the firing of Comey, and now he has to get rid of Clintonista #2 at FBI. Once he has his MAGAmen in charge, the swamp-draining will proceed almost automatically.

You know who’s shitting cunt-shaped bricks this morning? Hillary. And possibly the gay mullato xirself. A new sheriff’s coming to town, and he don’t owe the degenerate freak mafia a thing. These two treacherous narcissistic zombies want to keep their ugly mugs in the media, undermining Heritage America at every chance, then they can expect Trump and his new loyal FBI director will make the spotlight uncomfortably hot for them.

Trump is performing a valuable governmental service besides draining the swamp; he’s showing cuckservatives how to win again. And some of them are starting to believe. They feel it, and it feels good; nothing feels better than a hard fight with T levels pumped to maximum fortitude.

PS Anyone remember that Syrian air strike? Yeah, that’s what I thought. Big to-do about nothing. Go choke on your black pills, Trump turncoats.

PPS Here’s video of Putin reacting to the Comey firing by doing what should be the default mode for anyone interacting with the media: humiliating the reporter.

Ann Althouse notes that the leaders of Europe’s four biggest economies have zero biological children among them. (h/t reader pavetack)

Theresa May, UK, no children (unable to have them)
Angela Merkel, Germany, no biological children
Emmanuel Maricon, France, no biological children
Paolo Gentiloni, Italy, no children

May is the least cucked of these four, and it’s therefore unsurprising that her childlessness was a pained regret imposed on her instead of a lifestyle choice. (Gentiloni is wobbly on border control, to put it nicely.)

I’m sure exceptions exist in the historical record, but as a rule, it’s generally better if a democratically elected leader has children than not. The feeling of stewardship and kinship is heightened when one has a stake in the future of the nation via his or her blood-bound progeny. Merkel and Maricon have no stake in the future of Germany and France (sorry, stepchildren don’t count on a Darwinian level), and so they will be inclined to push globalist policies that expand the scope of nihilistic degeneracy at the expense of racial and cultural continuity.

This excerpt from Maricon’s platform is so revealing of the globohomoist death cult mindset,

Perhaps because he wasn’t carrying the burdens of an entire gender when accounting for his [family deformation] decisions, Macron seemed completely at ease. He was saying, less apologetically than I’ve heard it said by a politician, that his family would be what he made of it, and that this was a cause for celebration, not suspicion or pity. His platform backs up his rhetoric, making special mention of the “diversity of family configurations”—married couples, couples in civil unions, co-habitating couples, parents who are together, parents who are separated, single-parent families, blended families, and same-sex-parent families—and promising to insure them equal rights under the law.

“Blended families” is a microcosm of what Globohomoists like Maricon want to do to the entire White West. Blend it out of existence.

Maricon’s shitlib blather to the contrary notwithstanding, it’s socially responsible to cast suspicion and pity towards rejects, misfits, and freaks who accumulate dysfunctional family formations like mutational genetic loads. This includes Maricon, a closet case who’s banging dusty grandma muff and will leave no legacy beyond being France’s last peacetime leader before the Siege of Elysee by Suleiman’s gremlin heirs.

A “diversity of family configurations” is code for “death of the West”. What libfruits like Maricon are either unable to process or resistant to accept is the beautiful truth that some family formations are better than others, and that this hierarchy has its source in our very humanity, which would be snuffed out if Maricon’s deformed families were to become the norm rather than the oddity. If the Family Maricons of the world were equal in estimation and under law to fitness-maximized heterosexual families with biological children, then it should be no threat to humanity if there were more Maricons to “celebrate” and fewer normal families to blend into the tar pits of the vast Dirt World.

Except it is a threat. A Maricon France means no France at all, at least not in any historical sense. Mariconism is Mort, the squandering of seed in barren old lady womb, the disappearing of White French from their homeland to be replaced by more reproductively vigorous invaders from swarthlands.

With stakes this high, suspicion and pity of Maricon’s Unfamily Circus are tepid responses. Mockery and ostracism would be more appropriate reactions.

Emailer M has a Game question concerning girls who needle men about their pasts.

Any quick tips for being in a relationship where a female frets about your past? I’m a frequent recipient of shit tests regarding my ‘fuckboy’ past. Example: ‘you’re so good at ____, you must have done this a lot of other girls’.

I’ll start with one I used in the past with wondrous success: “I was thinking about you every time” (for use after an extended break).

Hopefully these can help other readers in similar situations.

Agree&Amplify is your best friend in these situations.

FLARING FURROW: “you’re so good at _____, you must have done this with a lot of other girls.”

TRUMP’S IDOL: “practice makes perfect.”

If she persists (like thecunt didn’t), and Agree&Amplify isn’t leading her out of rummaging through your past, then you move on to DEFCUNT 2: LAY DOWN THE LAW.

PUCKERING PUSSY: “how many girls have you been with, seriously?”

HE WHOM TRUMP CONSULTS: “a normal amount. keep pestering me with this crap and you can join them.”

Generally, girls who are truly worried about your past and what it might mean for the present with you, won’t directly verbalize those worries, especially not in the glib manner that M relays here. So if a girl you’re with is sneaking in coy, quasi-flirtatious jabs about your past relationships with girls, she’s just winding herself up for a big drama fix. Many such cases. A numerically imposing number of women love manufacturing drama, because modern society with all its technocomforts, office cubicle desouling, and forcible betatization sucks the drama, and the essential sexual polarity, out of relationships.

To retrieve a semblance of that missing drama, girls will sometimes dig for juicy nuggets in your romantic past. This serves two purposes: One, it can alleviate her concern that she may have hitched her womb wagon to a beta mule with a thin romantic history, and two, it helps invigorate her flagging libido when she suspects she has to compete with the vagina power of girls cum before her.

A guide for interpreting girls’ fretting about your past:

  • If you receive no questions from a girl about your romantic history, she’s not fully invested in you. She still has too much relationship hand.
  • If you receive an occasional half-serious question from a girl about your romantic history, she’s worried just the right amount that you might be too good for her. Expect sheet-twisting sex soon.
  • If you receive a constant, irritating barrage of leaden questions from a girl about your romantic history, she’s either stalker material or rationalizing her utter lack of interest in you. Deploy A&A and DEFCUNT 2, and if those fail, beat her to the dumping.

Besides the obvious reason — that border walls work (ask Israel) — there’s the psychological factor. Enfant Terrible explains,

If he actually does it, building the wall will be Donald Trump’s greatest achievement as a president.

The psychological value of the wall against ZOG psyops will be enormous. When the wall is finished, DT popularity will soar to unbelievable heights, and it will be very hard for any shitlib to be critical of such a structure without sounding totally anti-American.

Plus, for a great leader to leave a long lasting legacy, nothing beats being the force behind some great public works that will benefit the nation for decades, or centuries to come. I can’t imagine that a guy like DT is oblivious to that reality.

The only way he will not do it, is if the (((secular people))) are holding a gun to his head. And if he doesn’t, then we know (((they))) are.

Building that wall, brick by beautiful brick, will be a giant middle finger to the anti-White, anti-Beauty, anti-Truth, Globohomo shell entities who stand for nothing but social decay, vapid consumerism, and Fake Virtue signaling. Nothing will humiliate and dispirit the snark demographic like a massive solid immovable structure, full of testosterone and phallic privilege, glowering down at them.

Build it, and they will moan.

Ready to unload a withering guffaw? While reporting on migrant squatters loitering in Rome’s streets, an Italian leftoid news anchoress was assaulted live on camera by the same swarth-saharan trash for whom she was trying to drum up sympathy.

mamma kek-a!

First, this media globowhore is HOT. Would bang, multiple positions, multiple times. I might have to apply bronzer, dress like a jihadi, and warm up my pimp hand to get her interested though.

Bella Francesca is a data point in favor of my personal theory that at the high end of female SMV, Italian women (along with French women) are among the hottest on the planet. Too bad they aren’t reproducing and their countries will soon be swarming with hairy awrah. 4,000 years of unique evolutionary phenotypes down the drain in three generations. OH WELL DAT SWEET EUROSLUT HSMV HAD A GOOD RUN.

Second, this YouTube comment:

The Hungarian speaks the truth.

PS Word has it YouTube has already taken down a number of copies of this video, so catch it now before the One World Governing Panel on Affirmative Censorship memory holes this one.

PPS Related: commenter Passer By compiled a thorough list of stats (with source links provided) that proves women are more left-wing and pro-immigrant invasion than are men.

Some words should never be spoken aloud….unless speaking them aloud is personally advantageous.

Once upon a tingle, I had gotten into a shouting match with a girl I was dating. As is the wont of her sex, she quickly wound herself up to a height of melodrama and hysteria on the flimsiest and stupidest of pretexts, emptying a deluge of emotion that was really about an old resentment having nothing to do with the reason given for her anger in the moment.

But the shrieking and carrying on had cracked my coolasfuckness. Even an Amused Master has a breaking point. My hand slashing the air between us, I growled,

“You don’t get it! I need you less than you need me.”

Boom, drop the shrike.

Now, my statement happened to be true, but it didn’t need to be true for it to hit her id dead center. A silence swept over her, lips trembling, eyes rattling in her sockets, and her face reddened, like a baby caught in a body-quaking anticipatory soundlessness just before unleashing a wicked wail.

But instead of corking off with a femme finale of righteous rage, she physically crumpled and loosed a bitter mewl…if that’s the way you feel about me….is that the way you feel?….cause that’s just an asshole thing to say….

Reading between the lines, I knew she was saying, “I’m not ready to let go of you, so I’ll step off this ledge I walked out on.” When a girl exhales a vulnerability like “cause that’s just an asshole thing to say”, you can be guaranteed two things: she hasn’t stopped loving you, and she needed to hear that from you.

The Game lesson is to remember “I need you less than you need me” by heart, because it’ll be useful if you spend any significant time with the furor sex. It’s a condensed and concentrated form of Dread Game, which when deployed will demoralize even the most combative girlfling. Your reward will be a renewed flowering of her adoring femininity…..for a while. Generally, though, the long term prognosis for relationships that have shared a vitriol to match in vitality any love that might be present isn’t promising. Rut and roam, gentlemen. You’ve only so much life to blow on poison giney.

This is an observant comment by theng85, about the costs, big and small, that Diversity™ imposes on society.

Also, a shower thought regarding vibrancy and open borders:

You’ve mentioned before that when a country’s border in weak or unstable, more mini-barriers will be opened up within the confines of the border. I’ll never forget walking by a brownstone in Brooklyn that had a “No border wall” sign in the window….A window that had bars over it and a locking gate around the property. What’s good for the goose isn’t good for the gander, I guess.

But there are more boundaries where there’s more vibrancy. My litmus test for whether or not I’m in a bad area is how easily I can access things in something like a gas station or a McDonald’s. If there’s a table with napkins, straws, ketchup, sugar packets, and I can walk into the bathroom and do my business without needing to talk to the staff, then I’m in a good (Read: White) area.

But if the ketchup and napkins are behind the counter, or you need to be buzzed into the bathroom/given a key, or you have to talk to the cashier through a 6 inch sheet of bulletproof glass, then you’re in a bad (Read: Vibrant) area. One of the selling points of my current apartment was that the 24-hour gas station down the street had open access to its bathrooms 24/7. That means I was in a safe neighborhood with little to no vibrancy. And I was right!

tl;dr: Diversity causes instability, instability creates boundaries.

Focusing on nonWhite invader crime grabs headlines, but the mass invasion of tens of millions of economic parasites warps healthy society in ways that brute crime stats don’t capture. It’s all the little annoyances — the locks on bathrooms in fast food joints and coffee shops in vibrant neighborhoods because the vibrancy has a habit of befouling public restrooms — that eat away at social trust and bonhomie, increasing individual stress levels. Welcome to Cortisol Nation.

You’ll have a big beautiful national border wall, or you’ll have a million smaller border walls surrounding all the places you love to visit and which make a nice life worth living. There is no third option. The Wall is inevitable. Choose the Big Wall, or the Million Small Walls. A border-less, Wall-less world is a fantasy that not even shitlibs believe if they are judged by the gated communities and strict zoning laws they avail themselves of to keep out the objects of their Fake Affection.

***

The Mamas & The Pepes sings “You Gotta Go Back” (and provide a helpful link to the ICE phone number and website).

Diversity + Proximity = War.

I got to thinking about this ugliest of Ugly Truths while reading a Sailer post about a review of a book written by a French “real estate theoretician” (now there’s a legitimate new job created by open borders) taking on political correctness. An excerpt from the Frenchman’s book jumped out at me.

A public-housing development is a community, yes, and one can wish that it be more diverse. But it is also an economic resource that, more and more, is getting fought over tribally. An ethnic Frenchman moving into a heavily North African housing project finds himself threatening a piece of property that members of “the community” think of as theirs. Guilluy speaks of a “battle of the eyes” fought in the lobbies of apartment buildings across France every day, in which one person or the other—the ethnic Frenchman or the immigrant’s son—will drop his gaze to the floor first.

Regular guests of Le Chateau will be familiar with the “battle of the eyes”, because it also features in dominance displays between men vying for women’s attention, and in seduction cues between men and women. (I personally love this archived CH post that advises striking a balance between unwavering eye contact and tactical distractedness when picking up a woman.)

Eye contact is a crucial indicator of a man’s self-perceived social and therefore sexual status. If he is given to promptly lowering his eyes when meeting the gaze of strangers, or of women, or of invader saracens, then he is communicating his low status. He is a beta male, and in the case of France, he is a beta male on his own turf.

Interestingly, there’s a confluence of biomechanical streams than join and flow into a delta where Game, Dominance, and Diversity mix in a toxic effluvium. Male dominance — telegraphed through various means, including body language signals — is inherently attractive to women. The ladies love men who show dominance over other men, and over women. The happy nature of woman is to submit to a powerful man; this goes doubly for careerist feminist shrikes. A woman never feels more fulfilled in the embrace of her feminine essence than when she is captivated by a man above her in all the ways that matter.

Men will always strive for dominance in one form or another over other men, because they understand beyond their conscious ken that this is the avenue to flared furrows. There will be no extinguishing of this male urge without reconfiguring humanity into something other than a sexually reproducing species. Men with kinship or national ties (but I repeat myself) can cooperate, but the dominance domino is always in the back of man’s mind, waiting to topple.

Diversity™ accelerates the internal drivers of male dominance; when a genetically and culturally distant tribe invades (courtesy of invites sent out by the globalist elites) the land of another tribe, male dominance displays are amplified and aggravated to the precipice, and beyond, of violence.

Smiling, too, is a cue of social status. Among men, toothy smiles are a signal of submission, of low status, and of low testosterone level. Smiling is context dependent; when a fighter is outmatched by his opponent, (and he knows it), he will smile more, indicating an unwillingness to proceed with hostilities (naturally, this display of submission only emboldens the stronger man).

Smiling relates to degree of Diversity™ as well. It’s no coincidence that America is both a diverse country and a nation filled with goofy smilers. Though this article‘s author doesn’t connect the dots, the real reason Americans feel compelled to smile so much is because Diversity™ imposes miseries on them and increases the contexts and opportunities for intertribal dominance displays. Sad to say that White Americans are losing this battle of the smiles; your typical SWPL isn’t smiling in the company of vibrancy because he’s friendly…he’s smiling because he’s signaling his submission to the invaders. As the emailer welcomerain wrote,

Apparently, Americans smile a lot cuz diversity.

This has many disturbing implications that the article does not explore. If we smile more to signal amiability in a diverse population, this necessarily implies that diverse populations have a lot of internal tension. In other words, Science has once again conceded that Diversity + Proximity = War.

The article does not make note of the fact that most of this smiling goes one way. Dindus maintain their thug scowls and angry pouts. Only the goodwhites supplicate with grins as immobile as car grilles.

It is by this means and toward this end that goodwhites are being forcibly betaized. This process feeds itself.

The Forcible Betatization of Western Whites is a perfect catch-all term to describe the evils of the Globohomo Inc agenda to de-White the White West: Step One: Neuter the White men.

Diversity™ will increase the need for dominance or submission displays such as “battle of the eyes” and smiling like a goof. As social trust craters, people must fall back on primal modes of interpersonal assessment, which means a return to primitive dominance and submissiveness postures to keep the social peace and prevent all-out tribal warfare. If this strikes you as a regression from European norms of social interaction to a more African-style norm, you’d be right. As a rule, when a more primitive people invade the homelands of a more civilized people, the primitiveness will push out the civilized norms, absent a show of cleansing power and the willingness to use it.

Game is partly an organic response to increased Diversity™, and in this definition I include a diversity of sexual market options. (The old meet-marry-mate rule has been tossed for a freewheeling mate-meet-manage expectations anti-rule.) The nexus of Game, Dominance, and Diversity™ becomes clearer: dominance displays must increase in a Diversitopia of both race and sexuality, and Game is perfectly situated to help men capitalize on that intensified need for communicating dominance, to acquire pussy as well as to flex power over invader tribes.

Women, for their part, are fated to submit to the strongest men, no matter what they tell themselves or write about in Salon, and a stew of competing tribes under one national flag means that White women will now be assessing the dominance scores of their White men against nonWhite men. The field of male dominance has expanded in scope, and resulting stress fractures are bound to split apart further an already frayed social fabric.

This is why the Globohomoists are intent on executing to the end their Forcible Betatization of White men; the less White men feel they are the owners of their homeland, with a government that has their backs, the more inclined they will be to submit to the globalist locust scourge. A creeping powerlessness means more stupid smiling and lowered gazes to appease the Diversity Rötherhämmerung.

Game can be White men’s salvation, giving them once again a “home of their own”, as it instills a powerful sense of self, of entitlement, of prerogative, and of mastery over their women and their public spaces. The times demand solutions that may offend the moral sensibilities of the smiling defeated.

Manjawed women are avoided by men because men don’t like women who look like men. CH has written about this topic a number of times, so the news won’t surprise regular readers.

Too much femme T
there goes my chubby

Evolution has seen fit to incorporate this distaste for masculinized women into the male limbic landscape as a hedge against female infidelity and getting cuckolded. It turns out the manjaw (and associated manchin) in women is linked with an increased “sexual unrestrictedness”, which in laybro’s language means manjawed chicks are more likely to step out on you.

It is therefore natural and normal and most importantly SELF-INTERESTED for men to prefer the romantic company of slender, young, attractive, feminine, womanjawed women.

***

In related SCIENCE, YO! news:

  • The more household chores a husband does, the more likely the marriage is to end in divorce. (Also an ugly truth CH has covered in the past.)
  • It helps (a lot) to be a female criminal defendant. “After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal history, and other prior characteristics, “men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do,” and “[w]omen are…twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted.” This gender gap is about six times as large as the racial disparity that Prof. Starr found in another recent paper.” Now some of this sex disparity (like the race disparity) is probably a result of female criminals exhibiting less depravity than male criminals in the commission of legally equivalent crimes. But a bigger reason for the disparity goes to something much deeper in the human psyche: the Fundamental Premise, which explains that female coddling is a natural psychological instinct among both men and women that exists because (most) women are more reproductively valuable than are (most) men.

Maricon’s literal old lady is a leading indicator that he’s a beta male (or beta gay) puppet of Globohomo, Inc. I would say that 64 year old Brigitte hit the Wall, but that’s superfluous; she experienced terminal velocity impact 25 years ago. The consummate insider Emmanuel Maricon has been riding a beat up mule since the day they met, when he was 15 and she was 39 (that’s 24 years of banging out dusty grandma muff…I can’t think of a worse exile from indulging normal male desire).

If Maricon wins the French Presidency, as now seems likely, France will have sealed its doom. You don’t shackle your nation’s fate to a squirrelly, low T, globalist lickspittle during times of crisis and expect anything good to come of it.

On the topic of wives as leading indicators of their husbands’ betatude or alphaness:

The Washington Post-Op tuts tuts about the Trump-Melania age difference (while lauding the Maricons’ age difference) because Bezos’s personal blog is staffed by mincing beta phagggots, bitter bitches, and hateful frozenites. Nothing bugs the Betacunt Establishment more than an alpha male exercising his sexual entitlement and availing himself of the hot younger women who are his natural, adoring constituency.

And of course nothing delights these same sexual market losers like a malleable betaboy-slash-closet case globohomoist taking up with a fat, ugly, or old woman and providing a sliver of hope for lonely feminists.

FYI, Maricon’s wife is fair game. Any ruling class cipher who wants to flood the West with indigents and orcs has fully earned the gloved shiv treatment.

FYI, part deux: 4channers sleuthed up information revealing that Maricon lied about tax evasion.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion