Where pretty lies perish.
Jul 13th, 2017 by CH
You only had to listen.
You listened!
The psychocunt man-hating dusty queef queen we narrowly avoided propelling into a position of absolute power where her corruption and hatred could go unchecked:
Truth in advertising. Hey Hillary, don’t you know our children are watching? HAHAHAHAHA cunt.
It’s time for thecunt to go on another of her wildwoman walks in the woods and spare us the displeasure of her return.
Jul 13th, 2017 by CH
Shitlord of the Month is actor James Woods. He has earned it. Here’s his latest blitzkrieg of the snowflakes that populate Twatter:
After a shriek of shitlibs lamely counterattacks, Woods agrees & amplifies, taking out another gay parade of bruised lib egos.
James Woods shows the way
You don’t have to cuck to have your say
PS What is it with shitlibs and their quasi-pedophilic urge to dress up children as political placards and immerse the kiddies in nonstop perversion pozpaganda? Is it the blank slate thing? Shitlibs believe all humans are the same and malleable from birth, so why not commence the reeducation camps at the earliest possible age? At this rate of degeneracy acceleration, we’ll be reading in a year about shitlibs going clockwork orange on their newborns.
#Trumperica
#MAGAMEN
#GRABBINPUSSIES
Jul 12th, 2017 by CH
An Orwellian story coming out of the Left Coast illustrates just how deranged and malevolent San Fran shitlibs have become trying to maintain their allegiance to the Equalism Narrative in the face of meaty intrusions by race reality.
BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) Withholding Surveillance Videos of Crime to Avoid ‘Stereotypes’
In the last three months, there have been at least three robberies on BART involving groups of teenagers.
“I think people are genuinely concerned — they are fearful about the stories that have come out about the recent attacks, the assaults, the thefts,” said Debora Allen, who is a member of the BART Board of Directors. […]
So far, BART has refused to turn over surveillance video for any of these incidents.
Allen told us the agency issued an explanation for why it is being tight-lipped about the thefts.
“To release these videos would create a high level of racially insensitive commentary toward the district,” she was told. “And in addition it would create a racial bias in the riders against minorities on the trains.”
According to a memo distributed to BART Directors, the agency won’t do a press release on the June 30 theft because it was a “petty crime” that would make BART look “crime ridden.” Furthermore, it would “unfairly affect and characterize riders of color, leading to sweeping generalizations in media reports.”
The memo was from BART Assistant General Manager Kerry Hamill.
Physiognomy alert (aging cat lady schoolmarm edition):
Allen emailed Hamill, “I don’t understand what role the color of one’s skin plays in this issue [of whether to divulge information]. Can you explain?” Hamill responded, “If we were to regularly feed the news media video of crimes on our system that involve minority suspects, particularly when they are minors, we would certainly face questions as to why we were sensationalizing relatively minor crimes and perpetuating false stereotypes in the process.” And added her opinion of the media: “My view is that the media’s real interest in the videos of youth phone snatching incidents isn’t the desire for transparency but rather the pursuit of ratings. [ed: ten bucks says she isn’t offended by the gaystream media indulging clickbait trump-russia fake news] They know that video of these events will drive clicks to their websites and viewers to their programs because people are motivated by fear.”
What a load of Shrewspeak. That last line reveals the rotten core of the shitlib null-soul: pure unadulterated psychological projection. “people are motivated by fear”. Well OF COURSE people are motivated by fear when there’s a REAL FUCKING THREAT TO THEIR SAFETY AND SECURITY. Fear is what shitlibs feel when their world view is crashing down before their eyes, like it is now.
[Allen] says all this raises questions, “What is the priority of BART? Is the safety of the passenger — of all passengers — is that a lesser priority than the race bias issue?”
I’ll answer for the priestess BART class: Yes. Your personal safety is less important than concealing and suppressing the truth about brown and black crime. Now you know the value that our overcunts place on your individual White life. You are nothing but collateral damage in the Globohomo War Against BadWhites Noticing Things.
Read the actual memo from Kerry Hamill, catlady esq. It is bone-chilling in its malignant, twisted shitlibbery. The stuff of Big Sister nightmares. Some excerpts:
Furthermore, disproportionate elevation of crimes on transit interfaces with local media in such a way to unfairly affect and characterize riders of color, leading to sweeping generalizations in media reports and a high level of racially insensitive commentary directed toward the District through our social media channels, email, and call centers. The BART Police Department has a hard copy of all the data provided to CrimeMapping.com. It is available to the public at its Lake Merritt Station headquarters. Many police agencies, according to the Police Chief, provide written versions of their police logs for public review at their offices as standard practice.
The key lie here is the word “unfairly”, as in it’s unfair to characterize some races as being more crime-prone when they are in fact more crime-prone. (It’s OK to characterize less criminal races as crime-prone though; that serves the Anti-White Narrative). The shitlib lies through her teeth when the topic is race or sex, and she lies so often and so effortlessly that she has lost the discernment to know when her bullshit won’t be swallowed whole by skeptical people outside her bubble.
The other lie is the sneering implication that “sweeping generalizations” somehow have no validity in the real world. The opposite is true: generalizations about certain races don’t materialize out of thin air; they become part of the mass consciousness by repeated observation of the behavior of different races.
The social media reaction to the original Coliseum incident in April was startling in the level of racial profiling that it prompted.
Adjustments made to accommodate the truth are often startling to virtue sneering shitlib SWPLs living in prohibitively costly all-White enclaves.
The General Manager got a call about the incident on her voicemail that used racist and incendiary language that made my mouth drop.
Another lie. Deep inside, she silently agreed with the language.
Many posts used patently offensive language that often involved racial slurs (no news articles ever referenced the race of the offenders yet some members of the public leapt to their own conclusions).
Justifiably, the public leaps to certain conclusions about the race of the perps because the media goes out of its way to conceal the race of the perps. Duh?
Some telephone calls and posts even involved vague threats.
She writes this as if she secretly suspects she deserves the business end of The Happening.
The media has proven its tendency to highlight material in the most inflammatory way possible.
Leftoid-to-human translation guide:
“inflammatory” = “truthful”
As a former journalist,
Auto-discrediting.
I can cite for you a number of bias studies that have pointed out media bias and the damaging consequences of it.
Those studies are bunk. (She’s probably referring to stereotype threat.)
The firestorm of criticism in the wake of the Oscar Grant killing centered around a belief that BART police were racially biased. If we were to regularly feed the news media video of crimes on our system that involve minority suspects, particularly when they are minors, we would certainly face questions as to why we were sensationalizing relatively minor crimes and perpetuating false stereotypes in the process.
One, crime by its nature is sensationalistic, and more so when the crime is committed almost entirely by nonWhites.
Two, it isn’t a false stereotype if the stereotype is based on a real, observable pattern of behavior.
The lies dribble from her mouth like cat cum.
I have worked in or with media since the 1980’s.
There’s her problem right there.
My view is that the media’s real interest in the videos of youth phone snatching incidents isn’t the desire for transparency but rather the pursuit of ratings.
Or maybe it’s just an old-fashioned belief that honest and true reporting still matters.
They know that video of these events will drive clicks to their websites and viewers to their programs because people are motivated by fear.
Whenever I hear a shitlib use this line, I want to ask her why she fears racism.
People can be fully informed about crimes that occur on our system without being shown images that will inflame some members of the public and paint the transit agency in a poor and ultimately misleading light.
BART will be bathing in poor light when their transit system is overrun by googles preying on passengers, and years spent actively covering up the nature of the crimes is revealed to the victims’ and their families.
Equalist shitlibs rationalize their narrative as if they fear a justifiable reaction from angry Whites more than they fear unjustifiable criminal predation by nonWhites. But no, what they really fear is the edifice of their carefully manicured egos flaming out upon contact with the illuminating sunfire of plainspoken reality. So they happily lie and throw the occasional bleeding White girl under the bus to preserve their domain of feels.
So many lies, so little rope….
Jul 12th, 2017 by CH
Feminists unable to tolerate evolved psychological and biological differences between the sexes, along with free love freakazoids on the supposed side of realtalk, cleave to the neoDarwinian meme that bonobo society proves polyamory is a natural instinct that humans share with them. Sexual jealously is just so gauche, don’t you see, pleb? Welcome to the polyamorous side of history!
The problem is that it’s just a feelgood meme for LSMV rejects; the actual research has discovered that bonobos aren’t polyamorous at all, they just happen to be less violent than other apes in apportioning bonobo pussy to the top male.
Bonobos have a reputation for being the peaceful, free-loving hippies of the primate world. But, researchers reporting in Current Biology on July 10 have discovered that despite friendly relations between the sexes, particular males have a surprisingly strong advantage over others when it comes to fathering offspring. For example, researchers found in one group that the most reproductively successful bonobo male fathered more than 60 percent of the next generation.
Another blast of ¡SCIENCE! leaves equalist losers rubbing their wounded egos.
The top male bonobos father most of the next generation, which means female bonobos are acutely hypergamous.
What’s interesting about bonobos is that they are less violent than chimps, but MORE polygynous, (that is, a few males get all the females). This is a puzzle for researchers because they thought female hypergamy was a downstream consequence of male dominance, i.e., “let’s you and him fight”. Men fight for women, and the women mate with whoever is left standing in the arena of genetic oblivion or survival. Bonobos show that female hypergamy itself is a decisive factor. The females don’t have to wait around for the males to duke it out; they glom onto the most charming of the bonobo PUAs.
So what do all those unloved beta male bonobos do with their extended fap-time as they watch a few alphas hoard the females? Apparently, male and female bonobos are very friendly with each other, so maybe the blue-balled beta orbiter phenomenon seen in humans evolved from bonobo females LJBBFing (let’s just be bonobo friends) their mangina males?
FRIENDZONED BY A BONOBO HO, NOW CHIMP CHICK IS MY FRIEND
The alpha male bonobos father 60% of the next generation. Imagine that degree of female hypergamy in human society. Did it exist once? Evidence is scarce, but tantalizing gene research says it did exist in the human past, to the extent that for every one man who reproduced, two women reproduced.
So, if you think beta male thirst is bad now, try envisioning a society in which half the men were lifelong incel and most of the other half had to share their women with a few harem leaders drowning in pussy. Somehow, the spark of civilization emerged from that stew of toxic hypergamy.
Jul 12th, 2017 by CH
This is turning out to be the week the Chateau carpet bombs the gangrenous ids of equalist freaks and fatties, with ordnance enriched by shibboleth-smashing ¡SCIENCE!. The latest evisceration: high waist-to-hip ratio fat chicks give birth to dumb kids.
Upper-body fat has negative effects and lower-body fat has positive effects on the supply of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids that are essential for neurodevelopment. Thus, waist-hip ratio (WHR), a useful proxy for the ratio of upper-body fat to lower-body fat, should predict cognitive ability in women and their offspring. Moreover, because teenage mothers and their children compete for these resources, their cognitive development should be compromised, but less so for mothers with lower WHRs. These predictions are supported by data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Controlling for other correlates of cognitive ability, women with lower WHRs and their children have significantly higher cognitive test scores, and teenage mothers with lower WHRs and their children are protected from cognitive decrements associated with teen births. These findings support the idea that WHR reflects the availability of neurodevelopmental resources and thus offer a new explanation for men’s preference for low WHR.
The wages of fat moms are mangled kids and dumb kids. Note that this study controlled for cognitive ability, so it is the DISGUSTING MOMFAT ITSELF that’s dumbing down the newborns.
Way to go, fatties!
Like I’ve said, shaming fatties is more than sadistic fun and environmental activism. It’s a goddamned moral imperative.
SHAME A FATTY, SAVE A CHILD
Jul 12th, 2017 by CH
Today we have two Shiv of the Week contenders vying for the Sacred Shiv of the Order of Shivlord.
Shiv wielder #1:
VS
Shiv wielder #2:
One shiv is a penetrating thrust into vitals, the other shiv is a poison-tipped prick of the skin. Both shivs have similar effects on the egos of the victims: crushing deflation.
Poll:
Jul 12th, 2017 by CH
This post is the start of a series celebrating the uncommonly exquisite beauty of the White European woman. Befitting the title of this blog, Chateau Heartiste, our first featured lady is a Frenchwoman by the name of Pascale Petit.
Oo la la. This is the face of a woman who could pull any man away from vidgya games and pr0n.
Not an ounce of superfluous fat on her either. Pre-sugar dosed and carb-loaded European women were almost universally thin, even if not all of them were ravishing beauties. Beta males had it good then. Today, not so much.
Enjoy these photos and remind yourselves that our Globohomo open borders ruling class wants to erase this painstakingly refined beauty from the face of the earth, forever. In my book, that makes the Globohomo Bathhouse Alliance the purest evil.
Jul 11th, 2017 by CH
¡SCIENCE! dropped two beautifully ugly truths this week that the Gaystream Media will never cover because their libshit audience craving dopamine hits of pretty lies would abandon them:
That second study is sure to outrage all the right creeple. The sight of gay PDA — PDGay — is as disgusting to straight men as is the sight of maggots.
In heterosexual men, pictures of rotting flesh, maggots and spoiled food induce the same physiological stress response as pictures of two men kissing each other. That is the surprising finding that was recently published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Psychology & Sexuality. […]
“In comparing the salivary alpha-amylase responses of participants to the various slideshows, we found that participants had higher salivary alpha-amylase responses to the images of two men kissing and the disgusting images. In both cases, these responses were significantly different than the responses they had to the neutral stimuli.”
However, Blair warned it was difficult to interpret the finding at this stage.
“It is difficult to specifically state what this means…”
I can tell the researchers what it means: homosexuality is a major vector of disease and social disruption, to which normal-sexuality men have evolved a disgust response that functions as a social shaming quarantine limiting their tribe’s exposure to debilitating and sometimes lethal gaysex pathogens. If gayness itself is caused by a pathogen, as Greg Cochran has theorized, then straight male disgust at the sight of PDGay is a perfectly plausible evolved reaction to a real biological threat, a threat that is particularly dangerous to any unborn children who could contract the gay disease and thus render themselves Darwinian dead ends.
Previous research has found a strong link between sexual prejudice and the emotion of disgust. For instance, a 2008 study found that individuals who are more easily disgusted are also more likely to make unfavorable moral judgments about gay people.
High disgust threshold libs will steer orderly civilization to the brink of extinction, at which time low disgust threshold chads will offer an oasis of health and vigor to a tired, sickly population who deputize the chads to pull us back from the blight side of history and return the HDT gene carriers to the cesspit of social invisibility and political impotency.
But it was clear that the physiological reactions in the present study could not be explained by the participants’ sexual prejudices alone.
“What is most important to note is that the responses did not differ as a function of self-reported levels of prejudice or self-reported levels of aggression towards gay men,” Blair explained. “In other words, it was not our highly prejudiced individuals who were experiencing a heightened physiological response to the images of same-sex couples kissing, it was everyone in the sample, even those with very low levels of prejudice.”
Haha, so #LoveWins “tolerant” straight shitlibs (practically an oxymoron) are just as disgusted by PDGay, a feeling which they spend inordinate energy denying to anyone who will listen. Libocrisy is the crisis of our age!
The finding provides more evidence that the so-called “gay panic” defense — the assertion that a person’s sexual orientation can “trigger” a crime against them — is bunk. The defense was used by the two men who beat, tortured and murdered gay student Matthew Shepard in 1998.
“Whatever is happening physiologically when someone witnesses same-sex PDA, it is not something so strong, or so uncontrollable as to explain the patterns of violent LGBTQ-hate crimes that have been repeatedly reported in the media,” Blair told PsyPost.
Lying homosexualist agenda BTFO.
“Why do people low in prejudice still show an increased physiological response? We can’t say definitively, however, it could be that society has socialized the notion of same-sex sexuality and affection as being ‘disgusting’ or immoral so strongly, for so long, that merely witnessing it causes a slight physiological stress response. It would be interesting for future research to examine whether this physiological effect is more likely to be found in cultures that still evidence high levels of prejudice compared to those who have made more progress towards normalizing same-sex affection and sexuality.”
This is exactly how I expect the typical logic-trapped shitlib to respond to evidence that straight men are disgusted by gay men kissing.
Shitlib: MOAR WORK NEEDS TO BE DONE AND $$$ SPENT TO NORMALIZE PUBLIC DISPLAYS OF ANAL SEX. TOGETHER WE CAN DEFEAT IRRATIONAL HINDBRAIN DISGUST REACTIONS THAT STRAIGHT MEN HAVE NO CONTROL OVER.
It’s funny, but having lived in areas flush with homos, one does become somewhat inured to the sight of gay men holding hands or kissing in public. The disgusted feeling never goes away; instead what happens is that one’s emotional reaction is deadened. It’s probably the same emotional deadening that surgeons undergo as they adjust to years of slicing open broken bodies, or that city dog owners experience from years scooping poop. It’s also similar to kissing an LTR…the electricity just isn’t the same as when you first met her, even if the feeling is still enjoyable.
I suppose that’s the point, eh? Shove PDGay down everyone’s ocular throats until we have lost any connection to our valuable inherited sense of disgust and related self-preservation.
Of course, shitlibs arguing for a mass inurement program to solve the problem of straight male disgust for PDGay would never argue the inherent goodness of the battle-scarred soldier who becomes habituated to killing swarths. No, in that case, the shitlib would cry to the bowels of hell for the soldier to find his inner compassion and disgust reflex and return to the world of indiscriminate love for all and all for indiscriminate love.
Because really that’s the centrally flawed conceit of shitlibs: support indiscriminate love and oppose discriminating hate. But the problem with that world view is evident. Love requires discrimination to have any meaning, and discriminating hate is the natural consequence of discriminating love, given that the former guards against threats to the latter.
Not that a study confirming the ick factor of gay male makeouts is needed to buttress common sense and layman’s observations, but shitlibs are the ones who hold ¡SCIENCE! up as the imprimatur of all that is right and good in the world, so it’s only reasonable that their delicate egos should be hand-wrung and roller-pinned by their own meme bestie, Ms Science.
It’s almost like the science-loving shitlib crowd don’t really love science so much as the idea of science which they can use as a rhetorical cudgel to silence those who have the gall to discuss actual scientific data.
Jul 11th, 2017 by CH
Non-black men are viscerally disgusted by fat blobby broads, and this disgust has its evolutionary logic at least partly in the fact that fat moms are more likely to birth children with congenital malformations.
Results A total of 43 550 (3.5%) offspring had any major congenital malformation, and the most common subgroup was for congenital heart defects (n=20 074; 1.6%). Compared with offspring of normal weight mothers (risk of malformations 3.4%), the proportions and adjusted risk ratios of any major congenital malformation among the offspring of mothers with higher BMI were: overweight, 3.5% and 1.05 (95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.07); obesity class I, 3.8% and 1.12 (1.08 to 1.15), obesity class II, 4.2% and 1.23 (1.17 to 1.30), and obesity class III, 4.7% and 1.37 (1.26 to 1.49). The risks of congenital heart defects, malformations of the nervous system, and limb defects also progressively increased with BMI from overweight to obesity class III. The largest organ specific relative risks related to maternal overweight and increasing obesity were observed for malformations of the nervous system. Malformations of the genital and digestive systems were also increased in offspring of obese mothers.
Conclusions Risks of any major congenital malformation and several subgroups of organ specific malformations progressively increased with maternal overweight and increasing severity of obesity. For women who are planning pregnancy, efforts should be encouraged to reduce adiposity in those with a BMI above the normal range.
Lay with a land whale, unprotected, and you raise the risk of bringing into the world a child with severe organ malformations and limb disfigurement.
I wonder what the fat acceptance and fat encouragement crowds think about the horrifying deformities that fat moms visit upon their newborns? Rhetorical. They don’t think about it at all. They stuff their giant bloated heads in the sand and wait for the bad feels to pass, like an impacted carboturd.
Fat Acceptors = Child Manglers. It’s more than just sadistic fun to shiv the blubbery hides of fat apologists; it’s a fucking moral imperative.
SHAME A FATTY, SAVE A CHILD
Jul 11th, 2017 by CH
The revolution will be animatronic.
News from the Emerald Guile: A sexbot brothel opened one month ago in Dublin, and customers are lining up for Dolly the Dirty Bot’s very special services.
GONE are the days of blow-up women with perpetually open mouths – sex dolls are rapidly evolving and becoming more lifelike than ever.
And now a brothel in Dublin is renting out a silicone robot sex doll for £80 an hour.
A bit like a buxom Barbie doll, the blonde android has massive boobs, an hourglass figure and eerily lifelike facial features fixed into a sexy pout.
Described as “Ireland’s most realistic sex doll”, Passion Dolly arrived at the Dublin brothel less than a month ago and dozens of punters have already had their way with her.
Weighing eight stone with 32 E boobs the doll imported from America has a metal skeleton covered in silicone and responds to vibrations moving like a human.
tbh, would bang, if I had no other satisfying realflesh options. A hot sexbot is a huge upgrade for loser men stuck with fat broads or for old men facing a sandpaper snapper desert of nursing home grannies.
When customers arrive they will find Dolly – who you can rent for £80 an hour or £40 per half hour – lying on a bed in a dimly lit room.
Condoms and tissues are also provided.
You couldn’t pay Dolly’s clean-up crew enough money.
Her owners explained: “We have had her about a month and have had dozens of visitors, mostly Irish men and ranging in all ages.
“Some of them are a bit lonely, a few have social problems interacting with women, while others have a fascination with dolls.”
Omega and beta males in a rut will be the primary users of sexbots. This will unleash tremendous shock waves on the sexual market, placing enormous pressure on the sub-HB7 Western woman who will experience an accelerating decline in the number of thirsty men willing to entertain her feminism, anti-femininity, and even garden variety coyness.
Sexbot brothels will be the predominant service until prices drop low enough that private sexbot ownership is feasible for the masses. We are far from end game in the sterile jizz pens of the sexbot brothel.
I found this news via a Christian website. The author predicts consequences from the sexbot revolution that sound very similar to what CH wrote on the topic years earlier.
For instance, here is the author Andrew Bieszad, 2017, on the implications of AI sexbots for human relationships:
What you are watching is literally the process of divorcing human beings from attachment to each other and, as a result the complete destruction of the family.
There are some people who are looking forward to the changes that sex robots will bring, because given the current developments and trajectory for the future, which will take some time to realize in a more complete fashion (and this is with everything- after all, a computer from 1995 is very different from a 2015 model), but when it is reached it will redefine the nature of sexual relations in ways that have never been reached before. […]
This is an incredibly dangerous road. If fertility rates are low right now, the sex robot will cause, worldwide, and absolute fertility collapse in all peoples, since sex affects all men regardles of race or place. Women will find themselves competing with a fantasy found in a machine to realize the unattainable, which is the perfect form. Men will to the same, pursuing the perfect vision of their pleasure, and for every woman that there may be, a better robot can be made to replace her.
Remember how in the West corporations outsource work to third world nations and destroy their local economy while benefiting a few? This is the outsourcing of sexuality to robots, thereby collapsing male-female relationships and creating a dystopic world in which pleasure is the rule and families are the rarity since people would rather pursue their fantasy through sex rather than use sex for its created purpose.Families will exist by choice, not by natural events. It will further isolate and again, make marriage something done by choice, not natural action. It will destroy the conception men and women have of each other by offering them a pleasure they cannot naturally have easily and everywhere, thus making human sex boring. Machine sex will pervert the very institution of sex itself and immerse mankind in an ocean of sterile hedonism.
CH, 2007:
But, outside of self-pleasure and procreation, would sexbots replace real women?
For some men, yes. The replacement would be total, at least until the dating market adjusted to the new reality. For other men, sexbots would be a part-time replacement. The result will be a shift in the mating landscape that will put selection pressures on humanity equivalent to a massive plague or a catastrophic famine.
Sexbots are a very real threat to the established order because men’s sexuality is so visually driven. Compared to women, it is a rather simple affair to create an alternative sexual outlet for men. […]
Either marriage will take a bodyblow from which it will never recover, or paradoxically divorce will decrease as husbands inclined to stray fulfill their cravings for variety with non-human mistresses. With the sequestering of betas to their sexbotatoriums, the price of alphas on the market will skyrocket. They will call the shots in matters of marriage — I see a regression to sanctioned polygamy and overt adultery. This will herald the end of Western civilization. […]
Conclusion – The entire market structure of dating will shift seismically in the direction of men becoming choosier and less willing to please and women becoming looser and more willing to please.
Do you think I prophesy the future for shits and giggles? I’m here to save the world, dammit! With amused mastery, of course.
I look at that 1920 map, and Southern segregation becomes completely understandable.
I look at that 2020 map, and national separation becomes completely necessary.
The national and collective interest must always supercede the private and individual interests. We're still paying the price of a Faustian bargain made centuries ago.
Fourth, the fact that White Americans are not composed of any single European nation, but are a blend of all White nationalities, with the Germanic element predominating, means that an ideology grounded in a pan-European "Aryan" racial mythos will always find more appeal here than any form of nationalism rooted in the old 19th-century European nation-states.
A related theory I've had about how ethnic White immigration during the late 19th to early 20th centuries shaped founding stock White America's racial consciousness is that the success of incorporating ethnic Whites into the dominant WASP culture may have conditioned White Americans to believe they could incorporate nonwhites just as easily.
It was not an easy assimilation, though. Italians and Irish brought their racial habits with them, and it caused troubles here. But they were close enough, genetically and racially, to the Anglo-Germanic core that incorporation, largely helped along by ethnic intermarriage and mixed-ethnicity children, was successful, after fits and starts.
The problem with that success merging White ethnics with Anglo-America is that it opened a Pandora's Lox of hubris and recklessness. The newly emerged broadly White core of America, stripped of its ethnic boundaries, came to believe that, based on past successes assimilating the White ethnics, there would be no difficulty doing the same with nonwhite immigrants.
And the economic boom that coincided with the years following the ingestion of White ethnics likewise conditioned White Americans to think that nonwhite immigration would provide similar economic benefits to the country.
Our success assimilating White ethnics, ironically became our failure to assimilate nonwhites.
One is the fact that, as a former colonial power, race and racial conflict is central to the lived experience of all Americans. As the country becomes more diverse, this factor is going to become stronger, not weaker—for the same reason race is such a dominant factor in U.S. prisons.
Correct. This is already happening in America. I wrote about this a while ago, making the point that the salience of Whiteness as a personal identifier will increase alongside the increase in proximate racial diversity.
Understanding that White Americans don't have the strong ethnic touchstones which are familiar to Europeans (owing to our high rate of interethnic marriage), it was always more likely to be a broadly White racial identity that would coalesce in the consciousness of White Americans.
In a 90% White America, Whites reflexively preferred to identify themselves by their particular ethnic ancestry, if they thought about their racial heritage at all.
In 60-50-40% White America, Whites will reflexively prefer to identify themselves by their Whiteness, and because of America's influence on Europe, Europeans will slowly inch toward a similar pan-White identity, converging with the racial consciousness percolating in America.
As a historical phenomenon, in spite of the current state of politics, there are several factors that favor the reemergence of Nazism, in a great power on the world stage, in the United States—on a long enough timeline.
I continue to hold to my hypothesis that the Holocaust narrative and it's associated reign of terror will be mothballed in the coming years due to Israel and World Jewry’s genocide of Gaza. The mothballing plan will be a slow, steady, decay of presence in all entertainment and information media, and Jews will receive orders to not bring the matter up or discuss it with gentiles under any circumstances.
Maybe. But imo it could easily go the other way, too, as jews feeling the heat come round the corner might double and triple down on their virtuous victim hagiography, hoping to leverage "Hyper Holocaust 2: Electric Jewgaboo" to secure the continued loyalty of a sufficient number of (mostly liberal) Whites who will shield jews from mounting criticism.
Either way, jews are in a bind. Loosen their grip on White consicousness and guilt-manipulation and risk White flight from finkelthink, or tighten their grip so much that it provokes a backlash.
It really “cemented” the hypothesis for me that the Holocaust’s presence in our minds was entirely due to career intimidation by Jewish power. I always knew people only publicly supported the Holocaust narrative because the consequences were, without exception, swift and severe. Every case, no matter how slight, deserved exemplary punishment.
I don’t want to mislead people with my comment. While I “doubted” the necessity of such vicious intimidation regarding the Holocaust, at this time in the early 2010s, I still believed it was a true story, even if Jews were exaggerating and being overbearing about it. But as the years have gone on, I think we really have been victims of an elaborate, orchestrated, coordinated confidence scam by the world Jewish community. It really was just atrocity propaganda thought up by the Allies and Jews after the war to deflect away from horrible Allied bombings of civilians in Germany and Japan.
The Purge was a movie with the premise that all crime is legal within a 12 hour period.
I wish there was something similar with social media. A 12 hour period when it's legal to fedpøost like a warrior bard.
And it'll still be the jews.
Sounds like some kind of jewy shit. Yeah, crack down on universities that take money from anti-Zionists.
If we had real representation and not a zog puppet show, our government would simply pass legislation banning any US university from taking any foreign money.
That would help reorient the priorities of academia.
