Where pretty lies perish.
Posted in Game on May 17th, 2016
What to say to a girl who has, unbeknownst or not, co-opted a favorite PUA line for her own amusement? A reader explains: To CH & readers, quick tactics question — what if a girl pulls the Heartistian “don’t flatter yourself” riposte on you? How do you reply? That happened to me, and not being […]
Posted in Alpha, Current Events, Game, Girls, Hope and Change, Psy Ops, Sluts, Videos on May 17th, 2016
It’s generally advisable to avoid ever apologizing for any infraction of social or courtship etiquette — particularly if the rules of the etiquette which would constrain you were established by your enemies — if it’s women’s hearts you want to hoard (and men’s loyalty you want to mobilize). However, even alphas with unimpeachable state control […]
Posted in Biomechanics is God, Game, Love, Rules of Manhood, Science Validates Game, Ugly Truths on May 16th, 2016
Options = Instability. A Chateau maxim as universal and relevant to life satisfaction as the famed CH aphorism Diversity + Proximity = War . The O=I theory was introduced in this original press post : Where you have options, you have trouble sticking by one person. A man dating a girl (or girls) will feel […]
Posted in Game on May 15th, 2016
Certain combinations of speech are optimally attractive to women. Wit, conversational fluidity, and terseness are common elements in the kind of wordplay that women most adore in men. On that subject, reader Sorcerygod explores the confluence of body language with, well, actual language. The body language IS worth taking a closer look at , but […]
As long-time Chateau guests know, body language is a crucial factor that helps define a man’s sexual market value. There is unsexy (beta) body language, and sexy (alpha) body language, and men can learn to avoid the pussy-parching postures and to adopt the muff-moistening miens. Our latest example of alpha male body language is this […]
Posted in Game, Rules of Manhood on May 5th, 2016
Although the sexual nature of women never fundamentally changes, there do happen over the course of a lifetime environment- and age-conditioned… accommodations … to sexual market realities that subtly modify women’s romantic needs. As such, there are different schools of Game a man should know which are tailored to the life cycle stage a woman […]
Posted in Game, Rules of Manhood on Apr 30th, 2016
The ((( Rebbe ))) explains, The easiest way to get “The Look” is to find close family members who have it (and those who don’t). Your family members will be very close to you genetically, so study how women react to them. Even quiz women on their impressions: Ape the good traits and carefully avoid […]
There comes a time in a man’s life (or a few hundred times) when the sum total of his gathered experiences with women and the wisdom he gained from them is called upon to help him out of a pinch. The pinch I refer to is when a woman accuses you of sneaking around on […]
Posted in Game on Apr 28th, 2016
A DHV, for the new recruits, means Demonstration of Higher Value. It’s shorthand for the observable fact that women are romantically intrigued by men who occupy higher social or lifestyle status than they do. On that intro, reader ReedAndLEWIS writes, Been using this line in person and online to great results after we have some […]
Posted in Alpha, Current Events, Game, Girls, Love on Apr 27th, 2016
Piers Morgan (he’s had a “come to shitlord” moment) writes about Trump’s sway over the ladies . Read this, and you’ll wonder yourself if Trump was a founding proprietor of Le Chateau. ‘They say every powerful man is good in bed,’ I once asked Donald Trump. ‘That true?’ He smirked. ‘I think there is a […]
The jewniparty desperately wants mass amnesty. The only reason they haven't yet pulled the trigger on it is because neither side of the jewniparty wants to take the blame for it. So a game is being played where Dems get to whine about immigrant rights and Repubs get to complain about the criminal element while each side quietly searches for the right softening rheoric and the opportune time to agree to an amnesty.
As usual, Whites are left without any real representation.
True, race-mixing is actually a little bit more common among White men than it is among White women. The differences are notable, however.
White women tend to miscegenate with nonwhite species that are far from the White norm, eg negroes, jeets, dune coons, and the blacker spics.
White men more typically miscegenate with whiter-Latinas and with Orientals. This is not quite as repugnant to the White senses, although it is still inferior to same-race coupling.
The other big difference is a consequence of the biology of each sex. When White men miscegenate, they don't get pregnant. They can conceivably knock up White women side pieces or return to White women to make White babies.
In sharp contrast, when White women miscegenate, they get pregnant and are out of the mate market for a long time (nine months plus a few years they spend all their energy raising the monstrous infant or toddler). A White woman pregnant with a mixed-race abomination cannot just go and have a White baby with a White man. Worse, when she births the frizzbomb, the presence of it will actively turn off White men, robbing her of yet more opportunities to redeem herself by snagging a White man.
Consequently, many years of her fertility are sacrificed and she suffers a much larger opportunity cost to have a White baby than would be the case for a race-mixing White man.
It strikes modrens as unfair, but these are sociobiological realities, and Nature does not care about our ideas of fairness. A woman's womb is simply more precious to the tribe than is a man's sperm.
The direction of causation runs both ways. In sexual politics, it takes two to tango. That's what makes the problem so seemingly intractable. White men and women must meet in the middle, or it won't work out. Women have to show loyalty (sexual and racial fidelity). Men have to show strength (hierarchical dominance and social supremacy).
The catch is that the entire societal machinery of Weimerica has made it impossible and downright dangerous for White men to tap into those masculine virtues, while it has made it exceedingly easy and personally beneficial for White women to abandon their virtues.
This is known as Pawgatory.
White women will not get White men's strength until White men are assured White women's loyalty.
This is the bind. My suggestion: Name and shame the White woman race traitors. Women respond to mockery and to social shunning. It will be more effective if the shaming coomes from other White women, but any bit of shaming will help.
Ultimately, the jewish control of our racial mythos and public discourse will have to be dismantled for White women to fully heal from their self-destruction indoctrination.
jews: "let's you and him fight, and we get the spoils"
Do you get more engagement or more calories on a daily basis?
The benefits of young White men eschewing the JewS military are manifold. The obvious one is that the zog war machine is deprived of its best soldiers. Incompetence will spread like a zombie virus.
Less remarked upon, but perhaps more beneficial in the long run, is that dispossessed and poorer White men without the military safety net will be thrust into our increasingly expensive and economically demoralizing "free market" of finance capitalism, where the humiliations and hopelessness of it will be inescapable, and thereby provide the energetic inputs for White rebellions.
Kinda feels like the world is accelerating toward a combined Butlerian Jihad and Muad'Dib Jihad. Is this Ragnarök?
lol I am cracking up rn visualizing an American le 56% soldier bleeding out and on death's door, dramatically supine in Trump's lap, reaching for his lapel to tug on it, and finally wheezing the froth-choked words, "We cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon" before dying.
Cue Star of David halo shining over Trump's head.
