Feed on
Posts
Comments

Fat apologists:

Environmental shocks:

Keepin’ it real.

87 Responses to “Fat Apologists And Environmental Shocks”

  1. JayMan says:

    For that matter, HBD Chick’s post on the topic is worth seeing:

    it’s not nature and nurture… | hbd* chick

    [CH: “Nurture” is not the relevant environmental shock.]

    • JayMan says:

      Approve the comment sitting in moderation.

      And for that matter, try reading the link from this one.

      [CH: you sound emotional. settle down jabbaman, it probably got caught in spam for too many links.

      ps try understanding what i’m saying before mouthing off.]

  2. Proud to be a Coloradan. Or, should I say, slightly less ashamed…

  3. Peter Connor says:

    Does the environmental shock relate to tacos and bilingual “education”?

  4. tang3zang says:

    The many species of fat apologists:

    1. The Equalist: Fat is just as beautiful!

    2. The Conspiracy Theorist: Fat isn’t harmful, that’s just a lie told by Big Pharma/weightloss agencies/doctors worldwide so they can sell their services.

    3. The Irresponsible: It’s not our fault we’re fat, 60% of the human race is genetically predisposed to fatness! And I’m like, super stressed!

    4. The Racist: Don’t judge me by your Western beauty standards, people in other cultures would love my obesity!

    5. The Illogical: This one study says that some fat people can be healthy, so that totally discounts the mountain of evidence that says otherwise.

    6. The Activist: All I’ve been doing is telling everyone how great fat is. Why do people keep disagreeing? I must be a victim of fatphobia.

    7. The Relativist: I’m not fat, I’m a real, curvy woman!

    8. The Schoolgirl: D-don’t say fat is bad, feelings might be hurt.

    • Holden Caulfield says:

      I would add:

      9. The Feminist: Being fat with a military haircut is empowering.

    • JayMan says:

      It would be helpful if you knew what you were talking about.

    • anon says:

      Conspiracy theorist #2: agricultural subsidies made everyone fat.

    • Troubadour says:

      “Don’t message me unless you can handle a REAL woman who has CURVES! I’m beautiful and I know it, but I’m not some skinny bitch!” from the online dating chick who has a picture angled to show part of an eye and most of a tit, which is the one angle where she almost looks vaguely human.

      It’s not about fads and fashion, it’s about vascular tissue passion. If my dick doesn’t twitch, then you’re not sexy, bitch!

    • Greg Eliot says:

      10. The Anti-Gunner: How did these 15 bullets get in my hat?

    • 12. the multisize-ist ; ” fat is a social construct !”

  5. Once the collapse hits, there are going to be a whole lot of former fatties within a year.

  6. Could someone please explain to me what the first image is about?

  7. Amy says:

    The CDC’s BMI guidelines are ridiculously generous, so it’s even worse than what you see on the map. At 5’4″ I could weigh 170 pounds and not be in the “obese” category. A 5’4″ woman at 170 is very fat.

  8. Karl says:

    Alpha-male, muslim government doesn’t hesitate to expel intruders….

    http://www.philstar.com/nation/2014/02/22/1293305/shelters-tawi-tawi-be-put-filipinos-malaysia

    Planet of the SJW’s remains COMPLETELY silent.

    Next time some leftists demonstrate in favor of “amnesty” for illegal aliens in LA – shoot them on sight, let their bodies rot in the street. PUBLISH PICTURES OF IT.

    Believe me, the leftists will immediately find another topic to be bothered about.

  9. anon says:

    Humble Bumble is lookin relatively svelte these days.

    It all starts with a simple idea, doesn’t it? Everyone is special!

  10. jack says:

    I guess when you’re fat and your black dad was never around you want to believe fatness is destiny and parenting doesn’t matter.

  11. Unrelated: Jizzabel goes into nuclear meltdown over theory of sexual economics.

    http://jezebel.com/sex-is-not-an-economy-and-you-are-not-merchandise-1524954631

    The vid that caused them to go critical

    • Ronin says:

      Lulz. Must be rough for all those Jz readers to realize (yet again) they’re worthless.

      Obvs. they missed a few big Schumpeterian-disruptors besides just The Pill, there.

      Can’t find it now, but there was an article on The Atlantic about 2 years ago about shifting paradigms also, and how for Gen Y the previous demonstrations the WW2-gen had to make were out the window, more women going to college, fewer young men, more hookups.

      Enjoy your bitter harvest, Feminazis! :D

      • Ronin says:

        It wasn’t this one, but it was close, along with the Susan Walsh-esque equivocations for the gina tinglollzzzzlzlzlzllzz.

        http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/09/boys-on-the-side/309062/?single_page=true

        Heh. Fu**ing GBFM would have a FIELD day with that sh**.

        “Econ + Ladybutts 201″; preach it, brother GBFM!

        • FamilyMan says:

          “Most important, hookups haven’t wrecked the capacity for intimacy. In England’s survey, 74 percent of women and about an equal number of men say they’ve had a relationship in college that lasted at least six months.”

          Yep that proves it. They have fuckbuddies for six months. That proves they’re still real desirable for marriage when they’re even older. They have nothing to worry about.

    • Scray says:

      lulz. That ‘response’ article may as well just be ‘wow. just wow!’ repeated 500 times.

    • Anonymous says:

      Just tricked me into reading a Lundy west article damn u

    • It is actually worse than that, it was women who wanted divorce court to be tougher on men/to favor women.

      this in turn has made a lot of men not very interested in marriage; what man would want to risk losing all his stuff if the marriage fails?

      less and less men want to get married, they have too much to lose, and this makes a lot of women very unhappy as most women eventually want to settle down, marry and have babies

      Jezebel bitches may scream and stomp their feet all they want, but yes it is women – in good part – who have made things worse for women.

      • FamilyMan says:

        When women complain about redpill or MGTOW, I just tell them to change the laws. We need them to get the laws changed, it’s their job to make the laws less favorable to themselves. Otherwise, we’re going to treat them as somewhat dangerous, certainly without trust or closeness.

        Do you think this could possibly happen? Women would join together to demand fair courts, that will rule against women much more, so they can get their men back?

  12. Cuckoldedwhiteman says:

    Obesity, while unattractive, is actually a sign that your body has reached an equilibrium given your level of activity and what you consume.

    Fat people are balanced!!!

  13. Aquila says:

    Reblogged this on The Ethereal Cathedral and commented:
    Sloth and gluttony drive the obesity epidemic, it’s not that people are simply “born fat.” Some people are naturally big (in fact I am of the “good at powerlifting, slow running” type myself and I’ve always had an easy time putting on muscle and a hard time getting abs, I guess the female counterpart is a naturally curvy or voluptuous woman like Christina Hendricks), but OBESITY is a symptom of eating bad and being lazy.

  14. OralCummings says:

    The graphs seem to say that white females are actually holding the line against whale blubber more efficiently,at least,than us white guys,and far more than blacks and mestizoes. Get in shape and get yoseff some hot young poozie!

    • Troubadour says:

      Looking at the graphs in the link made me think about my grandmother. Grandmother in 1930: sexy young woman. Grandmother in 2000: formless fat woman.

      Grandmother in 1930: It’s time to make dinner. Go outside. Chase down chicken. Chop off head with ax. Rip guts out through neck hole. Blanch in boiling water. Pluck out feathers. Cook. Serve to men folk. Eat what the men left behind.

      Grandmother in 2000: It’s time to eat. Go to KFC and have the all-you-can-eat fried chicken buffet.

      • SC says:

        You’re supposed to pluck out the feathers before you boil it. Also, White men and women in the 1930′s sat together at the dinner table and ate together. I don’t know of any cultures that have the men eat first and women eat only the left behind scraps, but I would bet any amount of money that those cultures are non-Western.

        • Troubadour says:

          I was never present for any chicken beheadings and subsequent cookings, so I mangled some of the details.

          As to the culture, this was rural Virginia mountain culture through and through. I remember Mom and my grandmother running around the kitchen until long after the men and children had started eating, and my grandmother never took a seat until long into the meal.

          It was an extremely tiny house, so she ate in the living room on a TV tray, as did the children and all the younger members of the family. The small table was reserved for the elder men folk.

          I eventually came up far enough in the family to sit at that table, and I think I remember my mother sitting there with us one time, as more and more of the old men in the family passed on. My grandmother never sat there once. It’s just how things were where I “growed” up, ain’t nobody was more whiter than we was, no sir.

          • corvinus says:

            It was commonly recognized at the time that men required twice as much food as women.

          • JCclimber says:

            Blanching in boiling water is to make the feather removal possible.

            Anyone who knows anything about real meat harvesting knows this, and even vegetarians who raise chickens knows this basic fact.
            He had the order correct.

          • Greg Eliot says:

            Where’s that hen house raider thwack?

            I bet that chicken-plucker could learn us a thing or two ’bout the subject.

          • Matthew says:

            I think you better not make a mistake!

          • FamilyMan says:

            I doubt you could pluck out the guts thru the neck. You remove the guts by cutting the stomach open (sometime after plucking it at least a first pass) and ripping them out and washing out the inside.

          • SC says:

            I think that what your reply means is that there is much cultural diversity even within the White population. I have always lived in spacious homes. I am also not a Southerner. As far as I know, my mother and father always at together at the same table, as did my grandparents.

  15. thwack says:

    The fatter black women get, the closer we are to an economic collapse of biblical proportions.

    Selection pressure is a hell of a drug.

    • All of those who like to call us white supremacists should read that article. ( excerpts are in Italic)

      … … …

      …‘First time’ in history: White deaths outnumber births in US

      …Deaths of white people outnumbered births for the very first time in US history, the Census Bureau revealed Thursday.

      …Several demographers have pointed out that no other racial group in the US experienced a similar drop…

      … … …

      and you feminists and manboobs who think we are wrong to blame women

      read this,

      … The 2012 fall in white births versus deaths ratio is not the first alarming number that was released to the public this past couple of years.

      The 2011 census, published in May 2012, showed that for the first time in US history white births make up fewer than half the children born in the country, according to the US Census Bureau.

      … One reason is women with college degrees are choosing careers and are postponing getting married and having kids till at least late into their 20s. And census shows that if women have children later in life they will opt to have fewer of them, or be unable to have more.

      Also, data revealed that white women are more likely to be childless than Hispanic or African American women….

      … … …

      Liberalism and feminism are killing the white race and slowly destroying Western Civilization , both ideologies are anti-white male and encourage indirectly ( of course it is not said in so many words) race replacement

      this is not immigration, this is not multiculturalism, this is not enriching anything, it is race replacement, a form of slow genocide

      race replacement is what is going on, the facts are there and can not be denied.

      • Troubadour says:

        It’s pretty interesting and complicated to think about what’s killing the white race. I could rant about it for pages and pages. What it amounts to is this libtarded faggoty system we have makes it extremely unpleasant to raise children in this day and age. Every way you turn, some other meddling bunch of organized fruitcakes is out to crucify you over something. You spanked your child? Corporal punishment is outmoded and inefficient. Your kid is already eight and you don’t have $100,000 saved for college yet? You’re going to ruin your child’s future!

        I never would have agreed to put up with all this bullshit on purpose. I don’t blame anybody for choosing to opt out. Parenting in America is a crock of shit.

      • Rol says:

        I think we’re seeing the result of technological progress, it’s created a vacuum of sorts.

        We’re built to deal with harsher environments and various things that didn’t allow all this free time to engage in frivolous activities, relatively speaking.

        Evolution (nature) ensures there’s a price to pay for making such huge leaps in controlling the environment.

        We expend a lot of energy and resources in keeping people alive and providing a large buffer between stupid decisions and consequences. In some cases we provide incentives to people to keep them dependent on handouts. Of course nothing is ever free. We’re paying for all of this.

        I understand the mentality behind preservation, I just don’t believe it’s possible. People are simply too selfish and the overriding culture will never embrace this, especially when there are powerful, influential people who are only interested in short-term gain who are in the driver’s seat.

        You know the cliche “money is the root of all evil”. Well, so long as somebody (the elite), somewhere benefits from all of this, even in just the short-term, it will continue.

        It’s psychological warfare. Politicians are quite adept at this, which is why when you walk outside of your home, 99% of the men you encounter will be blue pill, white knight drones.

    • Tilikum says:

      lol. interesting.

    • Greg Eliot says:

      One steely-eyed missile man in the whole lot… sigh.

      And of course, right out of the gate, there’s the MSM obligatory cute little blonde with a feets-doan-fail-me-now n166er… (((shakin’ mah haid)))

    • Nicole says:

      Ok. That was funny. Unfortunately, it was also very illuminating. When did the flight or fight response become just flight? Is this a cultural thing? Have we trained most of our young men to run rather then stand their ground or is it something inside men that has changed? More importantly, how do we change it back?

      • The Burninator says:

        I read in the comments that it isn’t scary so much as startling. They’re in the dark following some kind of red light, then the lights pop on exactly the moment that a very, very loud air horn blares. Hence why all the photos look exactly like what you’d expect of somebody who was walking along in quiet suddenly hearing a previously invisible blaring semi-truck blazing two feet from where he is.

        I do agree about fight or flight. It’s been changed to “shelter in place” or flight.

        How that gets changed back I do not know, outside of men starting to socialize with other men again and forgoing the constant social requirement to have women present. Fortunately that’s starting to happen; I was recently invited to a men’s only shooting-cigars-Scotch club. Personal invitation only considered for membership, a trial period where the group decides if you’re worthy of inclusion and can (and will) reject you if you’re a limp wristed leftist, dues are respectable enough to keep out riff raff but low enough to let blue collar men participate, member list kept secret (no website, no formal place where it’s published, BCC emails), no formal hierarchy as in “tax status” or other things to bring it to the attention of the powers that be, and meetings held in various locals and not one specific spot. Raffle off good Scotch and rifles from time to time. A bit like a stealth men’s club. They shoot, they drink, they smoke and women are not invited nor accepted at any point.

        Interestingly enough the invitation came from a buddy of mine I made a couple of holsters for, after he heard me talk about red pill and the manosphere. I haven’t confirmed what sites he’s likely on, but clearly he’s out here somewhere, and apparently this club has well over 100 men in it now. Something, somewhere, is starting to gel.

        • FamilyMan says:

          How about being cold at the critical moment and actually slowing down, rather than fleeing or fighting? Two or three guys including the most alpha looking one seem to have their wits about them. That’s the response of a man I would trust (and would not want as an enemy.)

          • The Burninator says:

            I don’t disagree. I’m just stating what the website details, and such. None but the most battle hardened, likely in a real way, take well to sudden unexpected 110 db horns going off ten feet from their person.

      • FamilyMan says:

        We can stop putting them in jail when they fight back effectively.

        And start putting them in jail when they do the “knockout game” on innocent people.

        The justice system is designed to prove to any man that following his normal instincts is not permissible and if he tries, he’ll be prevented by the law before long.

        • Greg Eliot says:

          I checked out when I heard her say “we”.

          • Nicole says:

            Oh? And why would that be?

          • Greg Eliot says:

            Because, as you well know, there’s enmity between our respective seeds.

            In short, jump-the-snark negress, any time you say “we” and don’t limit it to your own inane Afrocentrist dupes, you’re being even more disingenuous than usual… which is saying a lot.

    • SGOTI says:

      Jeez what a bunch of fat, ugly slobs.

      Also, my father taught me not to tuck my thumb in my fist when I was about to coldcock somebody.

  16. FamilyMan says:

    Guy escapes the friendzone: documented evidence.

    Read this comment from two months ago and the two following.

    http://thoughtcatalog.com/samantha-walters/2013/12/how-to-break-a-heart-in-96-easy-steps/#comment-1165225577

    • Amy says:

      He was never out of the friendzone.

      • FamilyMan says:

        She says she gets wet for him now.

        • Amy says:

          No… she feels bad for him and she’s lonely. That’s not sexual arousal.

          • FamilyMan says:

            You could be right. Not sure how you get that from her saying she has “developed real feelings”, would the real thing be something more dramatic?

            Well he’d better take advantage of the opportunity to learn game then. Either she’ll run away, or she’ll be properly aroused, either outcome is OK for both of them.

          • Amy says:

            I didn’t see that she ever said she “developed real feelings” for him. She was trying to, but couldn’t.

            I’ve seen this scenario played out; it’s pretty common:

            [CH: No it isn’t. Stop lying.]

            1. Girl, lonely and drunk, sleeps with beta orbiter

            [Not common.]

            2. Beta orbiter immediately wants to take to the next level… girl says no, just friends

            [The beta orbiter wanted to take it to the next level long before she had sex with him.]

            3. Girl still lonely and since beta orbiter is “safe”, has sex with him again or multiple times

            [This simply doesn’t happen very often at all. Girls don’t have sex with “safe” men, especially “multiple times”; girls actively deny sex to “safe” men.]

            4. Beta orbiter clearly in love, girl tries to reciprocate but can’t

            [The beta orbiter was in love from the get-go. This is pure femcunt semantics you’re engaging in here.]

            5. Girl cuts it off.

            [Most girls cut it off before they let it get to the point when sex with the beta is a real possibility.

            Rest of your blather snipped for egregious violation of self-trollery rules.]

  17. Inane Rambler says:

    Why are you here?

  18. some dude says:

    Looks weird now that jayman’s comment is gone. I was gonna tell him to go fuck himself.

    [CH:No comment is gone. Inane Rambler is making a general unnested reply.]

  19. Tilikum says:

    bitchez and the drinks?

  20. thrust says:

    so, watched the new Robocop. blew flaccid assholes.

    Omnicorp made Robocop’s armour black as they wanted to make him more ‘dangerous’.

    So when Robo arrives back at the precient, his black partner greets him and says “nice to see you’re the right colour.”

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Can’t get a movie past the yellow light stage unless you pepper it with that sort of gefilte fish.

    • Rol says:

      I’ve given up on seeing any truly artistic movies (mainstream anyway). Everything goes through a PC filter. It’s so formulaic that it becomes a complete bore.

  21. Rman says:

    OT

    CH is gonna have a field day with this one:
    [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=443Vy3I0gJs]

  22. Ricardo says:

    Off topic.
    Regular reader of your site after I discovered it a year or so ago on my 19th birthday. Need some help with an issue I see growing rapidly here in south florida. Many girls here are into the fad of turning gay or have declared themselves bisexual. Many times I’ll stumble across a girl I’ve banged before or have tried getting with previously and she’ll introduce me or make it known she is with a partner of the same sex. Now I have no problem with what they do, I’m busy on my own terms and have a life. My question here is, what attitude should you have if an ex or former FWB were to approach you and try to make you feel defenseless by yapping about her new ex or new sexuality. This occurred to me this past weekend and I felt caught off gaurd a bit and game less.

  23. Tilikum says:

    CH:

    reply is broken in WordPress it turns out.

  24. MaineDad says:

    interesting to see the skinny dippers in Sydney AU were white and mostly in shape. It’d be impossible to find 1000 people like that here, on the same beach

  25. AlphaBeta says:

    The fat explosion seems to have originated in the Bible Belt…

  26. I swear I didn’t mean to. Stupid phone.

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion