Fat apologists:

Environmental shocks:

Where pretty lies perish.
Feb 23rd, 2014 by CH
Posted in Hungry Hungry Hippos, Tool Time, Ugly Truths
Family sizes have been shrinking all over the developed world.
The downstream psychological and societal impacts of only children are greatly under-appreciated by researchers.
For instance, fewer children means parents have less incentive to discipline or chastise those children for bad life choices. A parent is likely to fear losing the love of an only child more than would a parent fear losing the love of one of her six children.
If an only child decides to troon out, her parents might be hesitant to express much displeasure and disapproval because they don't have any other children to fill the void if that tranny-child decides to rescind her love.
Something like this dynamic, on a large societal scale, has serious implications for the shape of the culture and the willingness of parents to administer tough love. Pampered only children become vehicles for cultural degeneracy by drawing in fearful parents to sustain the system.
Butting into this conversation, I have complicated feelings about AI. It is a weapon that we absolutely must not allow the Left to monopolize. The potential to seriously undermine leftoid cultural hegemony via right-wing AI is vast.
But I also know that this is a weapon which in time will destroy us all by ushering into existence the Zero Trust Society and the Zero Employment Economy.
The former is the more likely outcome. For example, imagine AI image generation that can fool even the experts, and then imagine that tech in the hands of anti-Whites, who get to work using AI to retcon our White past with the addition of nonwhites in our photos, videos, and books. Soon, White people could become conditioned to acccept the false memory of a past America that was always majority nonwhite. A massive psy ops of that nature would effectively quell any pockets of White resistance to their racial overrun.
What AI would unleash is the institutionalization of the inability to discern reality from fantasy. People who cannot reliably know truth from fiction in media and government press releases will suffer extreme mental duress, and many will react to this funhouse mirror world by dropping out and re-grounding themselves into very small kinship circles, at the level of hamlets and rural outposts.
People in general just do not sufficiently grasp how utterly awful a zero trust society will be in practice.
Through the ballot box.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
😂😂 I had you going didn't I?
What does a Zero Trust Society look like?
It looks like Mass Surveillance and biometrics.
Colorado's White population is shrinking, and currently sits at 65% of the state total. The beaner population is exploding.
"Despite consistent increases in net migration, Colorado’s future growth is precarious. Since 2021, the increases in migration to Colorado have almost exclusively come from international migration, individuals migrating from outside of the United States directly to Colorado, rather than domestic migration, movement from other states into Colorado."
https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/3aa6968ec7a34ff8b0f172ad6ae6d23e
For a while, there was domestic net migration flow into Colorado, driven by White Millennials, but that appears to have tapered off.
Politically, what is happening in CO is similar to what has happened in CA. Conservative Whites left, and liberal Whites remained behind or moved in. As nonwhites (mostly hispanics) quickly began to electorally and geographically displace the Whites, the latter responded by either leaving or becoming even more rabidly anti-racist.
This is not a surprising reaction, because it reflects an all too common Stockholm Syndrome attitude toward racial displacement:
"If I overtly express my support for the beaners, they will treat me well and the other liberal Whites won't exile me for wrongthink."
If that's what Kavanaugh wrote or implied, then he's basically saying what all of us are thinking: that too much of our national policy is being foisted on the judiciary to decide.
Which is correct, but also highlights the sheer unlikelihood of Congress legislating anything that directly benefits White America. Congress' inability to do its job is not so much the result of institutional inertia as it is the consequence of an upside-down judaized morality that prevents the passing of common sense legislation.
Who is more anti-social? The man driving the oversized pickup truck with the pissing Calvin sticker on it, or the woman screaming at you like a banshee for saying trannies should not be public school teachers?
I see anti-social people everywhere.
Over 40% of food packaged and sold in the US is kosher.
jews are 2% of the US population.
In effect, Whites are paying a jew tax on their grocery purchases that they did not want nor vote for.
Whites are paying the Jewzya.
https://apps.bostonglobe.com/ideas/graphics/2018/11/the-next-bite/the-traditions/
Are the Whites or the niggers winning the World Cup?
I wonder if, at this point, the MAGA red cap does nothing but signal performative spitefulness, and that this perception of neutered rebellion encourages leftoids of either sex but mostly women to make public spectacles of themselves lashing out at MAGA hat wearing White dudes.
If White men were to, instead, brazenly occupy the public square in Hugo Boss SS aesthetics and a happy smile, it would signal intent of purpose, and some of these crazy White women might be more circumspect when confronted by their presence.
"Every woman yearns to submit, but only to he who is worthy of her submission"
Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.
Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.
Alternative Right
AmRen
Anonymous Conservative
Audacious Epigone
Dusk in Autumn
Education Realist
Evo and Proud
Gene Expression
Hail to You
Hawaiian Libertarian
Lion of the Blogosphere
My Posting Career
PA World and Times
Page for men
Parapundit
Rogue Health and Fitness
Steve Sailer
The Anti-Gnostic
The Kakistocracy
The Red Pill Review
Unqualified Reservations
Vox Popoli
West Hunter
Whiskey’s Place

For that matter, HBD Chick’s post on the topic is worth seeing:
it’s not nature and nurture… | hbd* chick
[CH: “Nurture” is not the relevant environmental shock.]
Approve the comment sitting in moderation.
And for that matter, try reading the link from this one.
[CH: you sound emotional. settle down jabbaman, it probably got caught in spam for too many links.
ps try understanding what i’m saying before mouthing off.]
Proud to be a Coloradan. Or, should I say, slightly less ashamed…
Until you get the munchies from all that decriminalized THC.
Haha true, guess the only hope is marijuana really being a “gateway drug” to cocaine…
If you think Coloradoans are skinny, you’ve obviously never been to a Wal-Mart in Aurora.
Does the environmental shock relate to tacos and bilingual “education”?
The many species of fat apologists:
1. The Equalist: Fat is just as beautiful!
2. The Conspiracy Theorist: Fat isn’t harmful, that’s just a lie told by Big Pharma/weightloss agencies/doctors worldwide so they can sell their services.
3. The Irresponsible: It’s not our fault we’re fat, 60% of the human race is genetically predisposed to fatness! And I’m like, super stressed!
4. The Racist: Don’t judge me by your Western beauty standards, people in other cultures would love my obesity!
5. The Illogical: This one study says that some fat people can be healthy, so that totally discounts the mountain of evidence that says otherwise.
6. The Activist: All I’ve been doing is telling everyone how great fat is. Why do people keep disagreeing? I must be a victim of fatphobia.
7. The Relativist: I’m not fat, I’m a real, curvy woman!
8. The Schoolgirl: D-don’t say fat is bad, feelings might be hurt.
I would add:
9. The Feminist: Being fat with a military haircut is empowering.
It would be helpful if you knew what you were talking about.
sperglords gonna sperg
Conspiracy theorist #2: agricultural subsidies made everyone fat.
“Don’t message me unless you can handle a REAL woman who has CURVES! I’m beautiful and I know it, but I’m not some skinny bitch!” from the online dating chick who has a picture angled to show part of an eye and most of a tit, which is the one angle where she almost looks vaguely human.
It’s not about fads and fashion, it’s about vascular tissue passion. If my dick doesn’t twitch, then you’re not sexy, bitch!
10. The Anti-Gunner: How did these 15 bullets get in my hat?
12. the multisize-ist ; ” fat is a social construct !”
Once the collapse hits, there are going to be a whole lot of former fatties within a year.
heh, three weeks.
It doesn’t take three weeks to die from dysintery.
Could someone please explain to me what the first image is about?
Dude in Christmas special talkin’ about how big Mrs. Clause’s fat ass is.
It’s the Island of Misfit Toys.
The CDC’s BMI guidelines are ridiculously generous, so it’s even worse than what you see on the map. At 5’4″ I could weigh 170 pounds and not be in the “obese” category. A 5’4″ woman at 170 is very fat.
Alpha-male, muslim government doesn’t hesitate to expel intruders….
http://www.philstar.com/nation/2014/02/22/1293305/shelters-tawi-tawi-be-put-filipinos-malaysia
Planet of the SJW’s remains COMPLETELY silent.
Next time some leftists demonstrate in favor of “amnesty” for illegal aliens in LA – shoot them on sight, let their bodies rot in the street. PUBLISH PICTURES OF IT.
Believe me, the leftists will immediately find another topic to be bothered about.
Humble Bumble is lookin relatively svelte these days.
It all starts with a simple idea, doesn’t it? Everyone is special!
I guess when you’re fat and your black dad was never around you want to believe fatness is destiny and parenting doesn’t matter.
Unrelated: Jizzabel goes into nuclear meltdown over theory of sexual economics.
http://jezebel.com/sex-is-not-an-economy-and-you-are-not-merchandise-1524954631
The vid that caused them to go critical
Lulz. Must be rough for all those Jz readers to realize (yet again) they’re worthless.
Obvs. they missed a few big Schumpeterian-disruptors besides just The Pill, there.
Can’t find it now, but there was an article on The Atlantic about 2 years ago about shifting paradigms also, and how for Gen Y the previous demonstrations the WW2-gen had to make were out the window, more women going to college, fewer young men, more hookups.
Enjoy your bitter harvest, Feminazis!
It wasn’t this one, but it was close, along with the Susan Walsh-esque equivocations for the gina tinglollzzzzlzlzlzllzz.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/09/boys-on-the-side/309062/?single_page=true
Heh. Fu**ing GBFM would have a FIELD day with that sh**.
“Econ + Ladybutts 201″; preach it, brother GBFM!
“Most important, hookups haven’t wrecked the capacity for intimacy. In England’s survey, 74 percent of women and about an equal number of men say they’ve had a relationship in college that lasted at least six months.”
Yep that proves it. They have fuckbuddies for six months. That proves they’re still real desirable for marriage when they’re even older. They have nothing to worry about.
lulz. That ‘response’ article may as well just be ‘wow. just wow!’ repeated 500 times.
Just tricked me into reading a Lundy west article damn u
It is actually worse than that, it was women who wanted divorce court to be tougher on men/to favor women.
this in turn has made a lot of men not very interested in marriage; what man would want to risk losing all his stuff if the marriage fails?
less and less men want to get married, they have too much to lose, and this makes a lot of women very unhappy as most women eventually want to settle down, marry and have babies
Jezebel bitches may scream and stomp their feet all they want, but yes it is women – in good part – who have made things worse for women.
When women complain about redpill or MGTOW, I just tell them to change the laws. We need them to get the laws changed, it’s their job to make the laws less favorable to themselves. Otherwise, we’re going to treat them as somewhat dangerous, certainly without trust or closeness.
Do you think this could possibly happen? Women would join together to demand fair courts, that will rule against women much more, so they can get their men back?
Obesity, while unattractive, is actually a sign that your body has reached an equilibrium given your level of activity and what you consume.
Fat people are balanced!!!
Weebles wobble but they don’t fall down.
My “set point” weight went way up after I built upper body muscle. Pros and cons.
Reblogged this on The Ethereal Cathedral and commented:
Sloth and gluttony drive the obesity epidemic, it’s not that people are simply “born fat.” Some people are naturally big (in fact I am of the “good at powerlifting, slow running” type myself and I’ve always had an easy time putting on muscle and a hard time getting abs, I guess the female counterpart is a naturally curvy or voluptuous woman like Christina Hendricks), but OBESITY is a symptom of eating bad and being lazy.
The graphs seem to say that white females are actually holding the line against whale blubber more efficiently,at least,than us white guys,and far more than blacks and mestizoes. Get in shape and get yoseff some hot young poozie!
Looking at the graphs in the link made me think about my grandmother. Grandmother in 1930: sexy young woman. Grandmother in 2000: formless fat woman.
Grandmother in 1930: It’s time to make dinner. Go outside. Chase down chicken. Chop off head with ax. Rip guts out through neck hole. Blanch in boiling water. Pluck out feathers. Cook. Serve to men folk. Eat what the men left behind.
Grandmother in 2000: It’s time to eat. Go to KFC and have the all-you-can-eat fried chicken buffet.
You’re supposed to pluck out the feathers before you boil it. Also, White men and women in the 1930′s sat together at the dinner table and ate together. I don’t know of any cultures that have the men eat first and women eat only the left behind scraps, but I would bet any amount of money that those cultures are non-Western.
I was never present for any chicken beheadings and subsequent cookings, so I mangled some of the details.
As to the culture, this was rural Virginia mountain culture through and through. I remember Mom and my grandmother running around the kitchen until long after the men and children had started eating, and my grandmother never took a seat until long into the meal.
It was an extremely tiny house, so she ate in the living room on a TV tray, as did the children and all the younger members of the family. The small table was reserved for the elder men folk.
I eventually came up far enough in the family to sit at that table, and I think I remember my mother sitting there with us one time, as more and more of the old men in the family passed on. My grandmother never sat there once. It’s just how things were where I “growed” up, ain’t nobody was more whiter than we was, no sir.
It was commonly recognized at the time that men required twice as much food as women.
Blanching in boiling water is to make the feather removal possible.
Anyone who knows anything about real meat harvesting knows this, and even vegetarians who raise chickens knows this basic fact.
He had the order correct.
Where’s that hen house raider thwack?
I bet that chicken-plucker could learn us a thing or two ’bout the subject.
I think you better not make a mistake!
I doubt you could pluck out the guts thru the neck. You remove the guts by cutting the stomach open (sometime after plucking it at least a first pass) and ripping them out and washing out the inside.
I think that what your reply means is that there is much cultural diversity even within the White population. I have always lived in spacious homes. I am also not a Southerner. As far as I know, my mother and father always at together at the same table, as did my grandparents.
The fatter black women get, the closer we are to an economic collapse of biblical proportions.
Selection pressure is a hell of a drug.
Why would I, as a white man, care about black women?
http://rt.com/usa/us-white-births-census-613/
All of those who like to call us white supremacists should read that article. ( excerpts are in Italic)
… … …
…‘First time’ in history: White deaths outnumber births in US
…Deaths of white people outnumbered births for the very first time in US history, the Census Bureau revealed Thursday.
…Several demographers have pointed out that no other racial group in the US experienced a similar drop…
… … …
and you feminists and manboobs who think we are wrong to blame women
read this,
… The 2012 fall in white births versus deaths ratio is not the first alarming number that was released to the public this past couple of years.
The 2011 census, published in May 2012, showed that for the first time in US history white births make up fewer than half the children born in the country, according to the US Census Bureau.
… One reason is women with college degrees are choosing careers and are postponing getting married and having kids till at least late into their 20s. And census shows that if women have children later in life they will opt to have fewer of them, or be unable to have more.
Also, data revealed that white women are more likely to be childless than Hispanic or African American women….
… … …
Liberalism and feminism are killing the white race and slowly destroying Western Civilization , both ideologies are anti-white male and encourage indirectly ( of course it is not said in so many words) race replacement
this is not immigration, this is not multiculturalism, this is not enriching anything, it is race replacement, a form of slow genocide
race replacement is what is going on, the facts are there and can not be denied.
It’s pretty interesting and complicated to think about what’s killing the white race. I could rant about it for pages and pages. What it amounts to is this libtarded faggoty system we have makes it extremely unpleasant to raise children in this day and age. Every way you turn, some other meddling bunch of organized fruitcakes is out to crucify you over something. You spanked your child? Corporal punishment is outmoded and inefficient. Your kid is already eight and you don’t have $100,000 saved for college yet? You’re going to ruin your child’s future!
I never would have agreed to put up with all this bullshit on purpose. I don’t blame anybody for choosing to opt out. Parenting in America is a crock of shit.
I think we’re seeing the result of technological progress, it’s created a vacuum of sorts.
We’re built to deal with harsher environments and various things that didn’t allow all this free time to engage in frivolous activities, relatively speaking.
Evolution (nature) ensures there’s a price to pay for making such huge leaps in controlling the environment.
We expend a lot of energy and resources in keeping people alive and providing a large buffer between stupid decisions and consequences. In some cases we provide incentives to people to keep them dependent on handouts. Of course nothing is ever free. We’re paying for all of this.
I understand the mentality behind preservation, I just don’t believe it’s possible. People are simply too selfish and the overriding culture will never embrace this, especially when there are powerful, influential people who are only interested in short-term gain who are in the driver’s seat.
You know the cliche “money is the root of all evil”. Well, so long as somebody (the elite), somewhere benefits from all of this, even in just the short-term, it will continue.
It’s psychological warfare. Politicians are quite adept at this, which is why when you walk outside of your home, 99% of the men you encounter will be blue pill, white knight drones.
Spot the alpha.
http://www.sunnyskyz.com/blog/130/A-Haunted-House-Snaps-Photos-At-The-Scariest-Moment-Of-The-Tour-And-I-Can-t-Stop-Laughing
lol. interesting.
One steely-eyed missile man in the whole lot… sigh.
And of course, right out of the gate, there’s the MSM obligatory cute little blonde with a feets-doan-fail-me-now n166er… (((shakin’ mah haid)))
Ok. That was funny. Unfortunately, it was also very illuminating. When did the flight or fight response become just flight? Is this a cultural thing? Have we trained most of our young men to run rather then stand their ground or is it something inside men that has changed? More importantly, how do we change it back?
I read in the comments that it isn’t scary so much as startling. They’re in the dark following some kind of red light, then the lights pop on exactly the moment that a very, very loud air horn blares. Hence why all the photos look exactly like what you’d expect of somebody who was walking along in quiet suddenly hearing a previously invisible blaring semi-truck blazing two feet from where he is.
I do agree about fight or flight. It’s been changed to “shelter in place” or flight.
How that gets changed back I do not know, outside of men starting to socialize with other men again and forgoing the constant social requirement to have women present. Fortunately that’s starting to happen; I was recently invited to a men’s only shooting-cigars-Scotch club. Personal invitation only considered for membership, a trial period where the group decides if you’re worthy of inclusion and can (and will) reject you if you’re a limp wristed leftist, dues are respectable enough to keep out riff raff but low enough to let blue collar men participate, member list kept secret (no website, no formal place where it’s published, BCC emails), no formal hierarchy as in “tax status” or other things to bring it to the attention of the powers that be, and meetings held in various locals and not one specific spot. Raffle off good Scotch and rifles from time to time. A bit like a stealth men’s club. They shoot, they drink, they smoke and women are not invited nor accepted at any point.
Interestingly enough the invitation came from a buddy of mine I made a couple of holsters for, after he heard me talk about red pill and the manosphere. I haven’t confirmed what sites he’s likely on, but clearly he’s out here somewhere, and apparently this club has well over 100 men in it now. Something, somewhere, is starting to gel.
How about being cold at the critical moment and actually slowing down, rather than fleeing or fighting? Two or three guys including the most alpha looking one seem to have their wits about them. That’s the response of a man I would trust (and would not want as an enemy.)
I don’t disagree. I’m just stating what the website details, and such. None but the most battle hardened, likely in a real way, take well to sudden unexpected 110 db horns going off ten feet from their person.
We can stop putting them in jail when they fight back effectively.
And start putting them in jail when they do the “knockout game” on innocent people.
The justice system is designed to prove to any man that following his normal instincts is not permissible and if he tries, he’ll be prevented by the law before long.
I checked out when I heard her say “we”.
Oh? And why would that be?
Because, as you well know, there’s enmity between our respective seeds.
In short, jump-the-snark negress, any time you say “we” and don’t limit it to your own inane Afrocentrist dupes, you’re being even more disingenuous than usual… which is saying a lot.
Jeez what a bunch of fat, ugly slobs.
Also, my father taught me not to tuck my thumb in my fist when I was about to coldcock somebody.
Guy escapes the friendzone: documented evidence.
Read this comment from two months ago and the two following.
http://thoughtcatalog.com/samantha-walters/2013/12/how-to-break-a-heart-in-96-easy-steps/#comment-1165225577
He was never out of the friendzone.
She says she gets wet for him now.
No… she feels bad for him and she’s lonely. That’s not sexual arousal.
You could be right. Not sure how you get that from her saying she has “developed real feelings”, would the real thing be something more dramatic?
Well he’d better take advantage of the opportunity to learn game then. Either she’ll run away, or she’ll be properly aroused, either outcome is OK for both of them.
I didn’t see that she ever said she “developed real feelings” for him. She was trying to, but couldn’t.
I’ve seen this scenario played out; it’s pretty common:
[CH: No it isn’t. Stop lying.]
1. Girl, lonely and drunk, sleeps with beta orbiter
[Not common.]
2. Beta orbiter immediately wants to take to the next level… girl says no, just friends
[The beta orbiter wanted to take it to the next level long before she had sex with him.]
3. Girl still lonely and since beta orbiter is “safe”, has sex with him again or multiple times
[This simply doesn’t happen very often at all. Girls don’t have sex with “safe” men, especially “multiple times”; girls actively deny sex to “safe” men.]
4. Beta orbiter clearly in love, girl tries to reciprocate but can’t
[The beta orbiter was in love from the get-go. This is pure femcunt semantics you’re engaging in here.]
5. Girl cuts it off.
[Most girls cut it off before they let it get to the point when sex with the beta is a real possibility.
Rest of your blather snipped for egregious violation of self-trollery rules.]
Why are you here?
Looks weird now that jayman’s comment is gone. I was gonna tell him to go fuck himself.
[CH:No comment is gone. Inane Rambler is making a general unnested reply.]
bitchez and the drinks?
so, watched the new Robocop. blew flaccid assholes.
Omnicorp made Robocop’s armour black as they wanted to make him more ‘dangerous’.
So when Robo arrives back at the precient, his black partner greets him and says “nice to see you’re the right colour.”
Can’t get a movie past the yellow light stage unless you pepper it with that sort of gefilte fish.
I’ve given up on seeing any truly artistic movies (mainstream anyway). Everything goes through a PC filter. It’s so formulaic that it becomes a complete bore.
OT
CH is gonna have a field day with this one:
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=443Vy3I0gJs]
and link:
America is…. Enriched
Colored sugar water with fizz …
Off topic.
Regular reader of your site after I discovered it a year or so ago on my 19th birthday. Need some help with an issue I see growing rapidly here in south florida. Many girls here are into the fad of turning gay or have declared themselves bisexual. Many times I’ll stumble across a girl I’ve banged before or have tried getting with previously and she’ll introduce me or make it known she is with a partner of the same sex. Now I have no problem with what they do, I’m busy on my own terms and have a life. My question here is, what attitude should you have if an ex or former FWB were to approach you and try to make you feel defenseless by yapping about her new ex or new sexuality. This occurred to me this past weekend and I felt caught off gaurd a bit and game less.
Propose a threesome.
Not sure if I’m joking.
I just quizzically ask how it’s possible for them to have sex with both of them on the bottom.
CH:
reply is broken in WordPress it turns out.
interesting to see the skinny dippers in Sydney AU were white and mostly in shape. It’d be impossible to find 1000 people like that here, on the same beach
The fat explosion seems to have originated in the Bible Belt…
I swear I didn’t mean to. Stupid phone.