The reason there aren’t even more disproportionately committed black-on-white crimes than there already are is not because blacks don’t hold much anti-white animus; it’s because the opportunity to prey on whites is limited.
Aided by store surveillance footage, Davis and Jones–parents to four children [ed: the future’s looking brighter every day]–were arrested yesterday. Dawkins identified both suspects when shown photo lineups.
During questioning, an “apologetic” Davis reportedly confessed to robbing Dawkins, claiming that he “stole the property because he needed new tires for his car.” Jones admitted that she and Davis went to GameStop intending to “catch a cracker,” which she said was slang for robbing a white person, cops reported. Instead, they robbed Dawkins, with whom Davis said she fought until Davis was able to drive away.
Blacks can’t “catch a cracker” if there are no crackers around to catch. This is why, despite SWPL moral posturing to the contrary, most whites with half a brain don’t live in the ghetto, and avoid meandering into ghetto space when an alternate path of travel is available. For the ugly truth is that blacks would target a hell of a lot more whites for their very special lessons in impulsive violence if whites made themselves more convenient plushtoys. But because most criminals are lazy and don’t venture far from their hunting grounds, the scope of their target selection is typically no larger than a four-block radius surrounding their filthy hovels.
Whites and other non-blacks (and even some blacks) who avoid predominantly black hoods — as per Derbyshire’s advice in his seminal column The Talk — are acting in their best interest and doing the smart thing by refusing to become an easy mark for thugs who perceive, more rightly than wrongly, that whites are soft targets of their malevolence. Narrative-enslaved conservatives who phonily lament the tragedy of “black-on-black” crime should know that black-on-white crime would dwarf it were it not for the happy “accident” of geographical segregation and black indolence. Remember that the next time you’re tempted to think that blacks can’t be racist because, hey, they kill so may of their own kind. They’d take out a lot more whites if whites would just stop moving the hell away from them. Stand still, cracker!
Xenophobia 101
hey herateietse! hearteietses!! da ghetto always rejects da GBFM because dis is how i roll and dey all run away form me which makes me sad feel sad an unaccepted and lonely loner zlziuzlzlzoZlzozzoizlzozzo
da gbfmz izkzlzo too white and nerddyzz lzuzzklzoi
A retard could manage to save $150 for a video game but these vibrant specimens couldn’t save for some times.
Tires*
With black encroachment into predominantly white neighborhoods being foisted by our would be rulers pretty soon those “softer” targets will be closer at hand. Fortunately, those “softer” targets will have learned to carry their “hardware”. Bang.
Or is it Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang. Damn, should have brought my pistol.
Eh. Black isn’t the problem. Ghetto criminal underclass is the problem. My best neighbor and the best boss I’ve ever had in my life were both black… and neither of THEM wanted anything to do with these ghetto scumbags either.
Lock and load
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/08/obama-administration-using-housing-department-to-compel-diversity-in/
And the “diversity” being foisted on us is income and single-parent-distribution diversity.
Race is a distraction to keep the White (Knight) Nationalists busily ranting whlist they miss the real agenda here.
I’d appreciate some advice on the following situation:
My gf of 2.5 yrs started showing signs that she was losing attraction before she moved away for school at the end of August. I no-contact zoned her after Sept 3 (also started martial arts training and lifting); she texted me Oct 1st with a brief update ending with “I was hoping to hear from you” and we talked on the phone two days later. I acted like everything was normal–small talk, catching up, &c, and she went along with this.
Then I asked her if she’d talked to her roommates about my coming to visit her in the latter half of Oct (which we’d discussed/planned previously). She tells me that she hasn’t because “she hasn’t heard from me” and that she is busy in late Oct but free early Nov. I go to check my calendar to set up dates but then she tells me not to plan anything yet because we need to get things “sorted out” between us.
Then she complains that I was “cold” when she phoned me before she left (not sure if this is true or not because the convo was over a month ago) and that I didn’t tell her “I miss you” &c. She tries to guilt trip me for not calling her by saying she’s not sure if I care about her, but I hold my frame that I was busy (pretending I didn’t know how long it had been since we’d spoken) and don’t apologize or supplicate. I point out that she could have called me and she says she couldn’t call because she hadn’t updated her phone plan, her laptop is broken, and the internet in her dorm was crappy (this is obviously bullshit because should could have texted me anyway, and there’s no way the internet was too crappy to send typed messages through skype. She’s also posted a few facebook updates so she obviously has internet access).
As the convo winds down she says that she “hopes to hear from me” or something of that sort. At the end I tell her I love her (as I normally do) but she doesn’t say it back.
So I’m wondering what’s going on here. Most of the stuff I’ve read about NCZ has lead me to expect that when the girl reinitiates contact she’ll be nervous but more into you. Presumably she wouldn’t have contacted me again if she wasn’t interested. But in this case why won’t she commit to my visiting her? Is she just genuinely distressed by my lack of attention or is she simply testing my frame? How should I handle this situation?
my current thoughts:
I’m actually not certain what to do yet in part because I’m no longer certain what I want. She’s a quality girl and I’m definitely into her, but after steeling myself for a month of no contact I’ve realized I can get along fine without her, and I’ve internalized my higher value so that I realize that I can get other girls if I want. Currently there seem to be few present benefits to me in staying in the relationship (esp. since it’s long-distance). So I’ve been considering just walking away.
At the same time, I don’t want to make a hasty decision or simply perform a knee-jerk reaction to the situation. I only started reading red pill stuff at the end of August. If she’s into me and if she regains attraction in response to my new frame, I think I would be quite happy with the relationship.
Was thinking of calling her again in a few days and telling her straight-up, “If you can’t commit to a visit I can’t commit to this relationship.”
I’d appreciate your suggestions on what to do including analysis of the situation and your reasoning.
tl;dr: NCZed LDR gf for a month, she re-initiated but seemed a lot less into me than I expected, and was unwilling to schedule a visit until things are “sorted out”
Forget her, younger brother- she`s banging someone else. Go get another one.
Police officers also do their best to keep whites out of the worst black neighborhoods. Several family members went to visit an old cemetery in a bad part of Philadelphia, and two police officers (one black & one white) ordered them to leave. This was on a sunny, winter Sunday morning.
This is the truth, let this information sear into your brain. Don’t reject it for it’s uncomfortable nature. It’s true, it sucks and it’s unspoken except for here.
It’s true. I’m white, I grew up in an all black inner city neighborhood. Me and my brothers had to fight constantly and were always made aware of the reason why. We were white. Get that white boy became all too common to our ears. While I fared decently, my oldest brother not so well….he began to instigate to make things worse. The middle brother is not something these people were ready for. Tough as nails. Never picked a fight but whipped the toughest of em all. So he got a pass and I expect I did because of him…but still I had to fight my peers. If a black kid got whooped by a white kid it was a scarlet letter….Awww, you LET that white kid beat you, u a bitch. I never knew racism until I stepped foot amongst blacks. There was very little hospitality for us…but there were a few GOOD people.
That experience has left me ultra aware and privvy to the mindset of an aggressive black. They DO think were marks. Most cases we are. I know what type of situations to put myself into and what not to. Most white guilt laden libs would call me racist but their fairy taled views ate not based on real life experiences so I just nod. I’ll be “racist”, sure cupcake, but ill be alive.
This is common sense. Even regular black folks such as I avoid the disreputable areas like the plague.
This is not a race issue, only a dumb motherfucker would intentionally put himself in a more dangerous position.
Exactly. Smart people stay out of situations which can statistically lead to trouble more often than not. It’s just common sense.
It’s a matter of knowing the statistics of a given area and generalizing as to one’s own best interest. It doesn’t even have to be racial: For example, most smart Hungarians avoid Gypsy areas like the plague (another group that statistically has a problem with civil behavior). Last check, they’re all basically “crackers”. Russians avoid people from Chechnya if they can help it, for very good reasons (again, all White Guys).
If Bill Cosby and other rational black men tell me that they too get nervous when approached by a group of young black men at night on a street corner, who am I to question their wisdom? They know statistics as well as the next informed guy, their stand is entirely rational.
Lots of “plushtoy crackers” are wising up even when not in these neighborhoods as well, lots of folks packing heat these days (lawfully) and taking lots of reflect combat courses and training. The days of easy target innocent “golly gee” Leave It To Beaver types is drawing to a close. Oh well.