International Women’s Day came and went (what, you didn’t notice either?), and feminists of all 152 gender persuasions celebrated in style. Memes like this one littered chat rooms:
A patriarchal reader decided it would be the perfect time to remind the celebrants in similar fashion about the men in science to whom we owe most of our civilizational comforts.
That’s one pale-looking pastiche.
The unintended consequence of made-up equalist holidays is to subtly neg the non-straight white male honorees about their disproportionately tiny contributions to Western glory. The designated uplift groups had it better when their spokes-shysters weren’t pushing for transparently phony recognition of romper room achievements. At least before this tard and brony show became America’s light unto the nations, the losers could pretend they had an awesome heritage which was being ignored instead of patronized.
this is teed up for GBFM
datsz what she said friday nightz! zlzooz
Missing Grace Hopper.
lzozozozozoz
lzozozozozozozoz
BETA OF THE YEAR:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3131900/posts
PORTLAND, Ore. — A crazed cat is behind bars after it attacked a baby and held an Oregon family hostage in a bedroom, forcing them to call 911.
According to KPTV, the ferocious feline — a 22-pound Himalayan named Lux — “went over the edge” Sunday evening after it was punished for scratching a couple’s 7-month-old baby. The baby was not injured.
When the peeved pet began charging at its owners, the family and their dog hid in a bedroom, where they called 911.
“He’s got kind of a history of violence,” the caller said, adding that the cat continued to charge whenever they tried to open the door…
I GUESS THEY DON’T HAVE 12-GAUGE SHOTGUNS IN PORTLAND.
OR EVEN JUST 410s.
RUNNER-UP BETA OF THE YEAR:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3131878/posts
Dad returns from Afghanistan to learn his kid is Duke porn star
A US Army physician came home from a tour in Afghanistan to find that his little princess had turned into a porn star. Devout Catholic Dr. Kevin Weeks was stunned by the news, but told relatives he and his wife are still supportive of Miriam, a Duke University freshman who has been having sex on camera to pay for her huge tuition bill…
EVEN THE FRIGGING ORCS KNOW THAT THIS IS WRONG!!!
Good Lord, what have we let society fall into, brother?
I can understand that sometimes a kid is going to be a rotten kid regardless of how well or hard you tried to bring her up right. But to “Well, I support her choice to disgrace our family name and dignity because she’s my little princess and can do no wrong” is so beyond wrong as to explain completely why princess pornstar turned out as she did.
Yep, this “man” is man in name only, and certainly not a father worth two shits. Second the nomination.
She is the same porn star we were talking about last week, the one who says being roughed up ( spit in face, slapped around, choked etc ) is empowering
she says she is a feminist ( goes to some University, into woman’s studies etc ) and some of those feminists agree with her; being abused/roughed up is empowering to women
go figure…
It is worth watching the first minutes of her porn video simply for the HUGE contrast between her and the man making the video.
He is articulate, reasonable, intelligent, logical, even concerned about her kind of like a father would be, he sounds like a decent man, while she is so dim she might be slightly mentally retarded.
The way she talks ( dumb, not articulate etc… ) I doubt she writes her own material ( that was published online where she “justifies” how a feminist can like to be degraded by men and find it empowering )
as far as I know the video is not available anymore ( Belle Knox at Facialabuse.com) but we have great people here in the CH communitywho can probably find it elsewhere!
She is a feminist parrot. There’s no mocking these people anymore as their self-parody has reached high art. As Conrad intoned in the preface to The Heart of Darkness, a work of art must carry its justification in every line.
Salon heeds to this advice with today’s hilarious expose’ on white men not taking black intellectuals seriously :
http://www.salon.com/2014/03/11/the_war_on_black_intellectuals_what_mostly_white_men_keep_getting_wrong_about_public_scholarship/
http://theothermccain.com/2014/02/27/special-snowflake-belle_knox-and-make-believe-feminist-empowerment/
EPIC takedown of this girl and her ilks illogical ramblings about porn being “empowering” as well as other feminist buzzwords
irony is she received a full ride to Vanderbilt and turned it down because Duke represented a “spiritual awakening” or some bullshit
taking women seriously: why america can no longer have nice things
” … Taking women seriously: why america can no longer have nice things… ”
I like this
Funny how one of the main culprits in bringing general disrespect to mainstream culture, and specific disrespect of straight white men, now bemoans how science and tech achievements are no longer held in awe, or even interest, by the plebeians he caters to… and whose mentalities of inanity he had a large part in helping shape.
When a degraded, debased leftist ascends to the top of a classics department, or when they produce a show on physics, think not that they have come to praise Science, but to kill it and bury it. The main point of the new Cosmos is the same as Family Guy, to destroy all that is manly, heroic, and true, for both Newton and Copernicus favored the gold standard, and thus all of Science must be destroyed.
I think GBFM would agree with this post
Why the Current Crisis in Ukraine is a Red Pill vs Blue Pill Superpower Clash
http://auaria.com/?p=81
zzzlolzzlollzzzlollzzzz
Annie Maunder looks like a young Hitler.
No that is the young Adolf.
Did you notice that most of these women look like men? Bears out a point I always made, successful women in the hard sciences are always masculine.
Career success correlates strongly with free testosterone in the bloodstream in women.
Godwin’s!
‘Sup wit Caroline Herschel? She look like her vibrator got stuck in her poozie!
She blinded me with science!
The funny thing about Wierd science is that it is entirely plausible that two teenage white boys could pull off a coup de main and reanimate or animate a robot type pleasure droid.
It’ll probably happen within the next 20 years.
All they were doing was 3D printing with flesh with added AI.
It’s probably already a standard feature in some Tokyo Lab. More Human Than Human.
The Men in Science poster. A Snowvalanche of Whiteness.
Bwahahaha. We all know that Dr Tyson is the cosmic genius, now that we are in Black Science Mumf. He even flew froo space in the PBS documentary yesterday. Flying some Gyptian Shiet.
Can’t reanimate Cosmos without a tip o’ the ten gallon to Sagan and now Tyson… those gas giants of the West.
Well, you got to give to Sklodowska and Ms. Noether and maybe Kovalevskaia. Back home, there were 0-1 women on the math olympiad team, 1-2 on the physics team, and 4-5 in chemistry (25 person teams). It’s possible, but rare.
Of course, the loud shouts of by The Village Crier, intended to make women forget that they traded in their fertile wombs for a pseudo-organic granola bar.MSM for other reasons
They’re distractible like that.
Emmy Noether I seriously respect. She is in the pantheon of mathematicians, gender neutral.
This is seriously cool. WHY do we have conservation of energy and momentum?
” if a physical process exhibits the same outcomes regardless of place or time (having the same outcome, say, somewhere in Asia on a Tuesday or in America on a Friday), then its Lagrangian is symmetric under continuous translations in space and time: by Noether’s theorem, these symmetries account for the conservation laws of linear momentum and energy within this system, respectively.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem
In my previous life as a physics professor one of my colleagues was quite fond of Noether’s Theorem. We taught our students to use it in a variety of ways and they got several publications out of it. It is, sadly, not taught at most departments these days.
Anna Carroll more or less masterminded Union strategy in the American Civil War. A lawyercunt. She buried her nose in the Mercantile Library in St Louis and devised the Tennessee River Plan: a pivotal play in the ACW.
Grant actually took the credit for the wannabe Coal Burner’s plan.
The problem with feminism is you have to accept great women scientists because they’re women. That’s pretty fuckin’ condescending, if you ask me.
I’d rather let their theorem, research, strategy or discovery speak for itself. If it holds up, is accepted, widely used, revolutionary – great! If not, shut up and sit the fuck down with the million men whose dumbass ideas didn’t pan out. Real accomplishment from anyone (female or not) is a lot more impressive to me than the fact that a particular scientist peed sitting down.
I’d rather let their theorem, research, strategy or discovery speak for itself
So would most women who are sincerely and genuinely into these fields for the right reasons (aptitude, interest, a desire to help mankind or maximize personal talent). If you hear anything from these kind of women themselves, it’s that they want to mentor young girls who want to be that too.
The feminists, on the other hand…
She won’t be a scientist until she’s mentoring young scientists, not young girls…
That was a razor sharp arrow of truth, right to the heart. Well said.
Interesting, but the implication of your noble statement is that you have no interest in mentoring young boys.
I think it’s a good idea, since you obviously have zero interest in doing so, we will let men only mentor young boys, and we will let women take care of the girls. Just as you will give preferential treatment to girls over boys, we, the men who actually have common sense and balls, will make sure to give preferential treatment to boys over girls.
My department decided to honor International Womens Day by subverting gender norms and sending the men from our desks to pack boxes in preparation for moving offices. I felt so empowered.
What happened to Marie Curie, top woman in hard science ever? Not PC enough? Her daughter was also a scientist.
Marie Skłodowska-Curie did half the work on the isolation of radium, her husband and academic mentor Prof. Pierre Curie did the other half.
Which earned her Nobel Prizes in both Physics and Chemistry and an early grave due to exposure to radium and other radioisotopes.
Didn’t she use to bathe in the radiation or something?
Or Ada Lovelace. Of course, people might have heard of her; can’t risk that!
But women are right to envy scientists and engineers. As that second poster mentions, you get to spend your free time studying while your classmates party and get laid. From your formative years in junior high until you die with a gray neckbeard, society lauds you with accolades like “dork”, “sperg”, and “neckbeard”. Bill Gates screeches nonstop about how there aren’t enough foreigners flooding the country to take your job at 1/3 the pay. And if you don’t develop some business skills, expect to take home around 10% of what your Patrick Bateman boss bills you out for.
More empowerment than should even be legal.
I worked too long as an engineer, if I had it to do over I would have gone sooner to the financial sector. Had to, to get paid. Engineers are great at cutting each other down. Idiots.
But when I was young, math and science always seemed like things I would be ashamed not to understand. Whereas social studies contained a lot of things I would be ashamed to do. (I have less shame about that stuff now, I was naive.) I understand that not everyone has such a strange sense of morality.
You sound a lot like me.
As for the morality of it all – the more I learn about sociopathy, and the folks who use sociopathic techniques to manipulate and destroy the naïve and the gullible – the more I’m all for firing back up the ovens of Auschwitz.
Being an engineer is the kind of white collar work that doesn’t even get you blue collar respect. For all those screeching harpies hating on the white nerds, they don’t want to actually do the work, they just want to run things. They actually look down on the work and the people that do it, as they do with any profession that involves mostly talking or writing prose.
And the tech companies screw their employees at every turn, they’re even colluding to keep salaries low through not trying to poach employees and more and more immigration. They pay just enough so you can afford the mortgage for the cupboard you have to live in, while they destroy all neighborhood business because they also feed their employees (it’s like assisted living for nerds or still living with mom).
She experimented with radium which was radioactive, which is an eebil white man thing. Nucular power = bad! Except when Russians or Iranians have it. Scary technology! Bad!
Back when Clinton was President they were in talks with Iran trying to dissuade it to move towards nuclear
and here we are still exactly where we were then, still playing nice with Iran… except for the fact Iran is even a bigger threat now
Yes, such a threat their nuclear scientists are assassinated with impunity.
Why, they’ve been mere months away from The Bomb since the first term of the Clinton administration!
My point is that it seems no one really wants to resolve the issue, other wise it would have been done by now.
Now why they make this drag on forever I am not sure.
Without an enemy in waiting, how could they continue to justify being on constant war footing? Iran serves that role well, never quite doing what they claim it will do, all the while being belligerent and a wonderful source of quotable quotes to keep the all-war-all-the-time happy.
It’s not Iranians behind flooding my country with non-whites.
I wondered why no Marie Sklodlowska Curie also. She seems to have been to physics what Margaret Thatcher was to politics. BTW, recently learned that when she discovered an element, she named it polonium after Poland.
Perhaps if you would read the poster’s title, you might understand, since most people HAVE heard of Madam Curie.
I think she is just too well-known to fit the theme of the image. “Look at all these women scientists you’ve never heard of! Why, there must be some sort of conspiracy or something!” Pure conjecture here, but I think most SWPL types have at least heard of Curie, and this meme thing was most definitely not directed at blue collar America.
I guess the implication is women have made enormous contributions to science you just haven’t heard of because patriarchy, but picking a few of those names at random I’m not convinced. This is all second tier stuff – if they were men you wouldn’t have heard of them either.
Is there a female Einstein or Heisenberg or Borlang? So you discovered the bacteria that causes Brucellosis… well, that’s something but it’s hardly on par with being the first to prove microbes exist and can cause disease.
This reminds me of George Washington Carver. Every school kid learns about George Washington Carver. If he were white even his descendants wouldn’t remember him.
Noether is at the top level. None others in my opinion. There are some soiid scientists, very good scientists, but only one of really top significance.
They should have “Science Month” and talk about the accomplishments of 10 top scientists and they could include Noether, legitimately. What a great opportunity to teach the principles of physics, which will actually help the students who could become interested in STEM.
This generalized gender focus does a disservice to the greatest, like Gauss, and those who are also great, like Noether.
The work of the great thinkers usually touches such fundamental questions that you can interest high school students in it, at least the top 20%. It touches what they study, if they do any thinking at all..
I would have called Noether a mathematician not a scientist. There’s a difference. Maths and theoretical physics obviously overlap a lot. She was clearly awesome though. Damned clever Jews, even their women are smart!!
“I guess the implication is women have made enormous contributions to science you just haven’t heard of because patriarchy, but picking a few of those names at random I’m not convinced. ”
Nah, the party line is that women would have ended hunger, instituted world peace and cured cancer if it’s wasn’t for the patriarchy not allowing them to be scientists.
Well, hand it to Annie Maunder. She and her husband did the seminal work on solar activity that will sooner or later be shown to have utterly eviscerated the AGW cargo cultists preaching that global warming is due to your using an SUV. That’s gotta be worth something.
I guess the implication is women have made enormous contributions to science you just haven’t heard of because patriarchy
Exactly. And then they use this to try to push their narrative on little girls, which is that you’ll be happier someday with a labcoat and a career, rather than a husband and a family.
I’m stealing this the next I’m in a conversation with friends who are raising daughters. And I will broach the subject tenderly, a la: Honestly sometimes I feel more regret and worry for the girls growing up these days than boys – at least the boys have plenty of time to recover from the lies they’re fed. The girls, they’ve got about 20-25 years from the time they start hearing the strong/independent-business-suit song and dance until it’s too late and they’re facing the Childless Cat Momma Event Horizon.
Well, I am. YMMV.
Urban dictionary says YMMV is your mother’s musky vagina
???
YMMV = Your Mileage May Vary
Thanks
Urban dictionary says YMMV is your mother’s musky vagina
This is what happens when you let negroes and South Park SWPLs put stuff on the internet.
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with wanting one or the other. Or figuring out a way to make both work (for that small percentage that can). What I dislike are the lies, and the truth being withheld.
You might be good at something technical. I probably should have done computer science. You might love your career. I was damn good at leading teams in the military. But a lot of girls just aren’t competitive in those arenas, and telling them that they can be and they should be and denying them the right to develop their own skill sets instead, just because that doesn’t conform to the narrative, is a cruelty.
International Women’s Day came and went (what, you didn’t notice either?)
I only noticed because Google had a doodle for it and I thought, “WTF is that for?” and I followed it to see what it was about. There’s never a SWPL issue that Google forgets to doodle, or a traditional one that they don’t doodle.
I demand an equalist holiday for female rape!
I’m not even sure what that means!
I, at least, am trying make up for the terrible disparity in the lack of white men raping versus black men. Viva la diversity, comrades!
Rape!
Coffee cleaned from the monitor, successfully, again.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/area-18yearold-demands-right-to-be-sexually-harass,1012/
Love it
Now imagine how few men on that second poster were;
-fatherless
-other than Christian
– grew up on “whole language reading”
– grew up in vibrant and violent schools and neighbourhoods
Yes! This is what I think EVERY TIME the sexes are compared!
From the Twitter feed:
“Multiculturalism will collapse due to its own internal contradictions
At York University in Toronto, a furor erupted in January over a request by a student taking an online sociology course to forgo an on-campus session, because he said his religious beliefs did not permit casual contact with women. At York, the professor refused to grant the student’s request, believing that it would be a dangerous precedent, labeling women as second-class citizens….”
Translation: as the multicult bacillus reduces the host to a fifth-world baksheesh shithole, the intramural slapfighting over the rotting carcass by the various tiers of the victimology pyramid will become ever more vicious. We see the first vague hints of this as the media suddenly awakens to the “knockout game” after some poor urchin, no doubt bewildered by his 400 years of oppression, unwisely plays it on someone whose posse has even more sterling victim credentials.
‘”It all goes back to the fundamental values the university has put in place that shape the culture — equity, diversity and inclusion — and tying them back to excellence,” said Sandra Carnegie-Douglas, the University of Toronto’s anti-racism and cultural diversity officer. “We look at what we need to do as a university to give students access so they can perform with excellence.”‘
See, why would you want to be some four-eyed enginerd when you can get a sinecure as an academic zampolit and sit around ejaculating Alan Sokel-esque shit like this?
We do the heavy lifting, too. Whenever there was heavy manual labor, the ladies disappear. And they want to be SEALS?
Well many women certainly have seals beat on amount of subcutaneous blubber.
Come medical emergency time the white guy by default often becomes the only guy in the room, despite status, training or age. Minority baby stops breathing ….you know the rest.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EfAAbosV8p0
http://aca.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8511828
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aEZdgtDtVo8
“Did you know it was a white man who invented latex paint?” -Eddie Murphy
high IQ female autists are indeed valuable contributors to the sciences for having little other value to society
the rest of these hoes need to realize STEM isn’t a refuge that you flock to as the economy can increasingly no longer support bullshit make-work desk jobs
Their grades in the freshman and sophomore level math and science courses will help them discover whether they’re cut out for it.
A girl doesn’t suffer much disadvantage for being autistic if she’s hot.
searching “hot autistic chicks” on the net produces about as many hits as one would expect
Pretty much anyone who spends time commenting on blogs is borderline autistic, so I wouldn’t be talking.
This is another off-topic comment so I apologize for that; however, I have a pretty tough situation that I wanted some feedback/advice on (CH your’s would be much appreciated). I’ve maintained an aloof alpha (for the most part) attitude with this 8.5 (high girl’s smv with lots of attention/availability to meeting guys) who is in her younger 20′s for about 8-9 months now where we would get together once every one or two weeks to do something/fuck and then we’ve been on long 1.5 month breaks of not talking. But it’s literally we hang out/fuck then don’t text or talk then a week goes by and i initate another hangout and she is consistently down to drop her things and hang out with me, so we’ve fucked probably 20+times. Weird relationship I know. Anyways, she playfully texted me the night before Valentines day which I didn’t respond to b/c I told myself I was done with her. As much as I don’t want to believe it with how attractive she is, I do think that this one time I ignored her text hurt her…Anyways, this past weekend I was stupid and messaged her (I got a new phone and don’t have her number) and told her we’ grab a bite (shit tested me, passed it) and she was down. We go to the park play catch, and I buy her and me a sandwhich. Then the tricky part. We start hooking up in my room and she stops it before it escalates more and says ‘wait can i ask you a question, what do you want from me…blah blah, you didn’t talk to me for a month, blah blah” i take it as a shit test and pass it but we went further and she was very resistant towards moving on with hooking up aka i only got her shirt off. We had the whole what do you want talk etc..and she even said ‘ok well im gonna go then’ walking to the door only to have me grab her to come back in. Keep in mind also that she was day 10-16 of her cycle. It felt like an ultimatum and I didn’t know how to react. She said almost word for word ‘i want to be more like a relationship and that she wants to be more serious’ i.e. make sure im not seeing anyone else. She also asked if I was “consistently seeing anyone else” which I repllied with “its complicated”. but these shit test responses she did not react well to and caused her to want to leave. Was this situation more of an LTR opportunity or a shit test?
I want to be in an ltr with this girl but i’m afraid because she is very young and i’ve been hurt before by a similar girl. My question is this: This was the first time she denied me sex ever out of about 20+ times. Therefore, if i start showing more beta (i.e. LTR material) I’ll look like I’m just trying to get the sex she didn’t give me aka desperate for sex. I get attached easily which sucks, but this girl is a keeper and I wanted to know how some of you (CH) would handle this so I can optimize my chances had keeping this girl. AKA what is the next move for me. If i start hitting her up more she will realize and understand her weapon: sex.
Overgaming dude.
She likes you. Now it’s up to you whether you want to give it a chance . If you get burned you get burned. But, you’ll never know if you don’t try
As has been pointed out recently, sometimes showing a little honesty and openness about your own feelings is the right move. You know, as if you were a real human being who has feelings….
Especially the fact that you’ve been hurt before can be a gold mine. It can quickly turn into a qualification test for her to pass. Just don’t be a beta chump and dump ALL your hurt feelings and longings on her. If she pushes too hard, just tell her that perhaps someday you’ll be ready to talk about it more when there is more trust, just not yet.
You don’t lock down LTR with pure cocky funny, agree and amplify and so on all the time. A little more beta provider with a strong alpha edge.
Can you tell us a bit more about her, relationship history etc.?
I agree with the last 2 guys, she asked you a fair question. Even you aren’t sure what you want this to be. Here’s how to be outcome independent and honest.
In this situation you want to spend more time with her, a more normal relationship. So, propose doing that. If she wants to, she will say yes.
Interpret her serious questions as a surrender. She is begging you for some commitment. Now if you want it, say yes.
Shit, she’s a good prospect to tie down, impregnate and live happily ever after. As good as you’re likely to get I suppose.
It seems she wishes you would tell her you like her and want to be exclusive and start something serious because that is what she wants
Why else would she need to ask questions before having sex?
Being beta in tiny doses can help when the goal is a long term relationship.
I’m not the expert here, this is just my two cents.
Tit pics or gtfo.
When someone you like asks you if you want to be in a relationship, I think the available answers are “yes” “no” or “I don’t know.” You say you want an LTR and she is offering that. I’m puzzled by your confusion.
Lol, women in college:
Twerking to Empowerment
I am sure she is going to cure cancer one day…lololozzzzzzzzz
Hilarity ensues at 1:27.
“The reason why I deserve this scholarship is… first an’ foremost, I am a twerk scholar, okayyy?”
Hahahahahaha!
haha, she has a tumblr too. It is pure gold wrapped in lulz. I posted a long comment with her quotes but this site seems to eat longer comments. SO, enjoy:
http://misskimari.tumblr.com/post/61826235757/twerking-for-empowerment
http://twerkscholar.tumblr.com/TwerkResearchPresentation
hehehe, lulz. Check out the .37 sec mark on this vid
she actually says she wants to figure out what it means to express herself in that way. she thinks she’s expressing something meaningful even when she doesn’t know what it is. and she’s the one expressing it. sweet jesus the oppression
She also said she’s twerking to heal herself. And that she’s not just in college to express her hypersexuality. She is a living breathing stereotype of what happens when you admit room temperature people into college.
Dear CH,
If it is your intention to stop the war between the genders, this is not the way. It comes off as a challenge, one that many a feminist will take on.
Sincerely,
Cleo
Dear [na,e], stupid remark, sincerely, [my name] is the new “wow, just wow”.
How will they take on this challenge? We already estimated the size of the respective arsenals at the top of this post, with the proviso that some members of the female lineup would not meet the standards for the male assemblage.
The same way a man would. I recently worked at a research facility and they actually preferred hiring women. Out of 22 employees, mostly male, only 2 females were left standing after a year. You’d be surprised, the times are changing.
I’ll help you understand what’s going on here Cleo. When a company prefers to hire women (a thing that would be impossible, under law, if it preferred hiring men), that means that you have a female dominated workplace.
The HELL of working in a female dominated workplace is exceeded by few things in life, excluding perhaps war or watching a Pauly Shore movie. I’ve worked in a few female dominated company and I could NOT get out of them fast enough. Y’all are impossible to work with, especially if you are a science inclined man it’s worse than being unemployed. Even most females will tell you that working in a mostly woman environment is nothing but a giant cat fight and constant interpersonal politics, 24/7.
The male dominated engineering and programming shops I’ve worked for have been eminently productive, peaceful and actually rather fun to work in since male camaraderie was not destroyed by female expectations and demands of constant towing the PC line. Not to mention the severe lack of useless meetings, which are a staple of female dominated companies.
Heh, heh… too true.
About 10 years ago, I happened to be awake one day in the wee hours o’ the morn, when I had one of those voila! moments… wherein the solution to a knotty issue on a current software system presented itself…
I quickly wrote an e-mail describing the issue and the proposed solution while it was all fresh in my mind… said solution, implemented later than day, worked like a charm.
I actually won a corporate award and a cash bonus, at a time when management was becoming increasingly stinting.
The only reply from the customer’s female project supervisor?
“There’s really no need to write e-mails at 2:00am… I’m not sure anyone’s thought process is as clear as it could be at that hour.”
Women have NO ROLE in a technology company.
Has there always been an “i” at the end of irishsavant or is someone “impersonating him?
…making sandwiches.
No, it wasn’t anything like that. Our boss kept women around b/c he found them to be more responsible. We didn’t have cat fights, no one was stupid enough to bring personal problems to work bc our boss fired people on a whim.
Yeah hon, women didn’t bring personal problems to work or have any kind of interpersonal political thing going on.
You apparently have worked in the only company in the history of time and space where such a thing was the norm. Congratulations on your spatial and temporal singularity.
Now if you’ll excuse me, the nation of Uzbekistan, of which I’m king, is calling me to my royal duties.
I worked at a high profile agricultural research facility. Women and men aren’t these two completely different species that behave and operate in radically different ways. Trust me, the people that argued at work (and these dramas were either male vs male, male vs feminist bitch female and RARELY female between female, this one only happened behind each others backs) were promptly fired. We had lots of work to get through, many eager employees waiting to take our jobs and a no-nonsense boss.
Le sigh. Sometimes I really DO have dick envy. Do you know how tiresome it is being doubted, shit-tested, and belittled every time I open my mouth? I feel like if I had been born male, getting my point across would be so much easier. Oh wait, you guys get plenty of that crap from the feminists, I changed my mind!
This. Especially if there are many women in management. I’ll admit, I had a wonderful woman manager once, but all the rest were hell. Women instinctively blame men around them for everything that goes wrong — no matter how obviously it their fault. When you combine that with female passive aggressiveness, you get a terrible manager. The first time I worked under female manager, it was because she promoted me to management. Six months later she blamed me for her screw up. Then she wrote a complaint against me. It was full of half-truths and distortions. So we went to war. A few weeks later she was fired because it became obvious she was trying to deceive her boss about the report. I’m not saying that no man would try that, but I’ve never had it happen or even heard of it happening. I’ve heard of lots of things like that from women.
Surveys and studies show that a high percentage of women would rather work under a male boss than a female boss or work with men than with women, that they feel they are treated better by males than females, that females tend to cause conflicts and tensions etc etc
Links were posted here at CH about a year ago if memory serves
and almost all women I know have told me the same thing as the above studies say
No one can stand women not even other women…
We are not misogynists we are realists.
I can not speak for CH but I don’t think CH is trying to end the war
winning the battle would be closer to it… in my humble/arrogant opinion
Let me explain this to you as clearly as I can. Men are on the losing side right now. It doesn’t matter how many girls you are banging, if you don’t reproduce, you failed your only assignment as a human being. Instead of egging women on, adding fuel to the fire, you could acknowledge that they are just as capable of success, but are more needed elsewhere. Or, you could continue challenging women, a challenge which they’ll continue accepting, stealing your jobs, earning your money and proving you wrong(also not birthing your children). I’m just pointing out that it’s not wise to poke the angry bear with a stick.
So cute.
Ya know, you need to discover for yourself that there are millions of educated men who aren’t afraid of the “angry bears”.
We also know that their jobs are built on the sandy foundation of unstable astronomic amounts of debt.
This blog has pointed out countless times the upward trend of female masculinization. UPWARD. Where is your masculinity going? Will pointing out that women haven’t achieved as much as men stop them from following the career path? No, it’s going to make them try harder.
Your call. I’m just a dumb female.
The pharmaceutical industry is already putting in extra hours dealing with these career women and their multi-pill cocktails of medication to help them “try harder”. Yet men are still the achievers, even if society no longer lets it be known (it hurts the feminine imperative to admit publicly after all). They seem to be losing this battle, if looked at objectively.
Okay, but now back to reality where phenomenal success is nearly all male, and the feminist career-woman types are the one who aren’t breeding and end up with a houseful of cats. These are the people who will slowly die out when they are demographically replaced by normal people, as in, most of humanity outside of suburban SWPL bubbles.
Oh yeah, they’re so scary.
Drop all of the “equal employment opportunity” crap and other laws forcing us to associate against our own best interests, and suddenly the “competition” from women would dry up and blow away.
Y’all aren’t “winning” because you’re better at life, hon, you’re winning because white knight boobs put laws, hundreds or thousand, into place to protect your pasty little derrieres from all of that nasty “I can’t win in an unrigged environment” stuff.
Now go hold 20 meetings today with other women, chatter about nothing fifty times to “touch base” and “clarify” and call it “work”, and be about your day.
Heh.
If there was ever a warning not worth heeding, it was this. Fundamentally, women don’t create value nor create new fields of understanding, it’s not about to change.
>>>>>I’m just pointing out that it’s not wise to poke the angry bear with a stick.
good lord, what will they do? cut off our precious supplies of HR? restrict the flow of fat acceptance scholarship? stop being productive at their government “jobs”?
Stop it? Fuck that. A few of us are knocking the dumb beavers back to the stone age.
If crushing feminists is what is needed to win this war, I am all for it!
Crushing feminists alone would do fine for now.
I’ve heard feminists try to rationalize why women are underrepresented among scientists. As always, their excuses range from bizarre to outright insane, and typically their ideas are so out there that I can’t tell if it’s a genuine feminist or a troll. One such excuse is that women are discouraged from science by the patriarchy or some other make believe force. But if someone is very passionate about science and wants to make valuable contributions to physics, chemistry or whatever field, why would people discouraging him from pursuing it, whether real or imagined, prevent him from succeeding? People who follow their passions will always make it despite whatever challenges they face, and if feminists think women need to receive constant insincere flattery and adulation to be successful scientists, then maybe women aren’t fit to be scientists in the first place.
Speaking of men in science, I started reading “Surely You’re Joking Mr. Feynman” after somebody referenced the chapter where he described getting a clue about how effective it is to buy drinks for a girl. I ended up reading the entire thing, and Feynman earned a place on my list of personal heroes. The book is worth a read:
http://www.chem.fsu.edu/chemlab/isc3523c/feyn_surely.pdf
Feynman was a legend. We could really use another Feynman today to set straight the mess that is modern science is becoming.
Women who are in science – and, more importantly, are actually capable of doing science – are not in science because some feminist meme told them they could. They’re there because they can do it, and because they can do it, they never once gave a damn what some (imaginary) white patriarchal system of oppression told them they “should be”. (Does any man honestly care about a woman who genuinely earns her way into the sciences, makes contributions, never ever uses gender as a crutch, and isn’t a bitch?)
This isn’t about elevating women. It’s about tearing down those women who aren’t toeing the line by taking their ownership of their own accomplishments away. THEY didn’t do it; FEMINISM did. You can’t be exceptional, there’s the collective to think of!
You men understand this, right? This is fourth-grade girl politics, writ large. It doesn’t get any more female than this.
Hillary’s campaign slogan: Bitch, You Didn’t Build That
(Does any man honestly care about a woman who genuinely earns her way into the sciences, makes contributions, never ever uses gender as a crutch, and isn’t a bitch?)
Honestly, no. If she makes great work without using the crutch of “empowerment feminism” or laws or expecting men around her to conform to the feminine imperative and lose their masculinity, etc, then more power to her. That, to my mind, is equality, it doesn’t require recreating reality and restructuring society and culture into some bizarre parody of itself.
This isn’t about elevating women. It’s about tearing down those women who aren’t toeing the line by taking their ownership of their own accomplishments away. THEY didn’t do it; FEMINISM did. You can’t be exceptional, there’s the collective to think of!
Fantastic observations, and I hadn’t actually looked at it that way, though I should have. Since females are inherently more collectivist than men it makes perfect sense, but approaching it as a man obscures the Collective Shaming technique going on here.
You men understand this, right? This is fourth-grade girl politics, writ large. It doesn’t get any more female than this.
Thanks for the insight.
A basic rule of thumb is; if you have three women in a room together, and they aren’t best friends or blood relatives (and sometimes, even if they are), one of them is trying to force the other two to conform. If they don’t, they will be subtly and sublimely punished until they do. On the macro scale, this means using organs of industry and state power, along with societal pressure, against the non-conforming. Men don’t really seem to understand this, and it causes a lot of issues.
Guys, if a woman ever comes to you with a problem with another woman, and the behavior isn’t clearly illegal, listen politely, and then tell her to STFU and get back to work. Similar responses should be employed with legislatures, in regards to “women’s rights” issues.
I’d say it’s about jealousy, but honestly, I think it’s more about safety and security; if nobody is exceptional, then everyone has an equal chance of securing one of the few good men.
grade inflation and ‘no child left behind’ accomplish the same thing… if you can’t fail, you can’t get credit for your success…
Nowadays I work in an office full of women… For to fill them up with hard truths…
But God Knows the only two women I have known over my long life, that I will be thinking of on my death bed will be 1. A Stone-cold killer psycho -pathic 11/10 bitch from hell who taught me how to commit sex crimes.;; And 2. an Angel sent from God….Absolutely cute. Feels so compatible. She passes out everytime on my lap while her skankoid mother tries to blantantly hook up with gayoid montrose rent-boys.
It cannot get worse. I cannot want her more.
OT.
The Poor Man’s CH has a blog:
http://melbuniblog.com/2014/03/08/a-dose-of-reality-tinderfessions/
Hopefully RedPill continues its global march.
Do other countries have their own version of CH/ROK/etc. in various foreign languages? I’d love to see the Swedish Manosphere unlock the inner Viking in legions of metro, P-whipped Swedes as their “Leaning-In” girlfriends and wives watch on in aroused horror.
..
Even if only 1/10th of that twitter feed is real the it’s not the global march of the redpill…it’s simply showing the global march of absolute sexual anarchy.
Read that twitterfeed.
We we are so far past any attempt at turning back from the semen filled gutters of our society it’s not even funny.
It’s a poon paradise. Nobody in their right mind would even CONSIDER an LTR or marriage when looking at the stark reality.
“Virtue has it’s own rewards” my ass.
As CH would say, “sit poolside, imbibe of the delights, and enjoy watching it burn.”
There is nothing else to be done.
Literally nothing.
That twitterfeed will fell and bludgeon to death any idealized notions you may be absurdly clinging to…
I know a Roumanian female physicist with four children and many publications and a husband. Does anyone know an American like her?
Black History Month reminds me of my favorite line from What Its Like To Teach Black Students. “This was diversity history where every black cook had a page on his contribution to how the west was one’.
Who got dem shine shoe? Who got dem ahine rim? Whp got dem shine grill?
The weirdest thing about that article was the bit about the German exchange student. He went overseas to attend a 90% black high school. LOL
Thats because to Germans, black Americans are American, not African; they know the difference.
Growing up we had a German college student stay with us for a week while she worked on a documentary.
Germans study everything, thats why they are so smart.
It’s genetic and you know it.
Their curiosity?
It was years later I discovered Germans are famous for that behavior:
.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90OrQIpF60o
The intelligence.
Actually the whole personality.
White Sausage Fest
It’s genetic and you know it.
—————————————————————————————–
Ok, If you say so.
Have to disagree thwack. To Germans, black Americans are blacks who live in America. Trust me on this.
lol. Ni99ers are ni99ers, boy. You actually drank the kool-aid…not surprising. Everyone with two eyes to see can tell the difference between a human and an ape like you.
Rape!
from the archives of Stock-Syndrome meets Hybristophilia:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/kidnapped-nuns-bond-with-alqaida-captors-we-werent-harassedat-all-they-were-kind-and-sweet-9182832.html
No, that’s the way Arabs are. They have the sweetest personalities you would ever believe. The are like Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde. They will invite you into their homes and feed you, and you know they are truly enjoying your company. Then, they will start talking about what a great guy some terrorist is. They don’t even realize that should make you enemies. Then, they will send you off loaded down with presents and make you promise 17 times you’ll visit again soon.
They probably made the nun feel truly like a guest. But if needed, they would have killed her.
Why are men are disproportionately represented in almost everything. Because gender equality is a social construct.
[…] International Women’s Day came and went (what, you didn’t notice either?), and feminists of all 152 gender persuasions celebrated in style. […]
Exactly the same happens in Music: the endless attempts to present 10th rate 19th century female composers as somehow unfairly treated and with more excuses than a school boy late with his homework as to why there is so little of it. Now, my taste in music is so bad that I rather like some of the present crop of female composers but the big difference between them and the men is that male composers good or bad have a tendency to go out on a limb, which is why there has never been the female equivalent of a Sorabji with his four or five hour Symphonies and Concertos – largely unpeformed and perhaps largely un-performable, though hugely admired by a select group of enthusiasts; why no female composer ever wrote a Tetralogy of Operas (like Wagner with his ‘Ring’) and why no living female composer is presently working on a twenty-four hour Opera (commenced in the 1980s due for completion in the 2030s) setting Dante’s entire Comedia as French composer Didier Marc Garin is presently doing.
IWD is a Marxist invention from 1910, which most women seem unable to observe is ultimately anti-male and anti-family and thus ultimately anti-women.
Despite the celebration, I notice that there is not a single one about Women’s Month in my FB newsfeed.
Shocking!
You are wrong on this topic. There are many fine women scientists. If you go to the Getty Images website and search “women scientists” you will find lots of good-looking women in lab coats working in gleaming white facilities, many of them peering intently into test tubes and micro-scopes, or sometimes even writing backwards on glass with lipstick while handsome defocused black scientists watch in awe!
What I don’t get though is the gay stock photographer fixation on megaphones. Maybe because it is both phallic and vaginal at the same time. There are over 4,000 megaphone-based images in the Getty database. In my life I have witnessed people using a megaphone about 3 times total.
I’m scratching my head over your megaphone comment.
is he German?
Oh I don’t think so :
http://www.pinterest.com/pin/298856125242908738/
How is a microphone phallic and vaginal?
It has a phallic horn and a vaginal cone.
Cleopatra
Let me explain this to you as clearly as I can. Men are on the losing side right now. It doesn’t matter how many girls you are banging, if you don’t reproduce, you failed your only assignment as a human being. Instead of egging women on, adding fuel to the fire, you could acknowledge that they are just as capable of success, but are more needed elsewhere. Or, you could continue challenging women, a challenge which they’ll continue accepting, stealing your jobs, earning your money and proving you wrong(also not birthing your children). I’m just pointing out that it’s not wise to poke the angry bear with a stick.
——————————————————————
What women have to accept is that men dont want to have children because family and children are liabilities for men at this point.
There is no upside to being a dad at this point.
It’s painful to point out, I have three. Whatever pride you take in them, the woman is in a position to take them away from you at an instant. The kids also tend to side with mom in all disputes. I’m not a divorcee btw.
The system is set up to vampirize men.
Director
The kids also tend to side with mom in all disputes.
————————————————————————————————–
Huh?
What kind of faggy world is that?
What country you from?
I’m really sorry to hear that. The pain sounds unimaginable. I’ve never thought about this issue from a man’s perspective.
” … I’m really sorry to hear that. The pain sounds unimaginable. I’ve never thought about this issue from a man’s perspective…. ”
Unfortunately very few women are able to see it from the man’s perspective.
That is why there is fierce opposition from us men to concede more power to females
“Son!!!!!” she said. “Have I got a little story for you!!!!” “What you thought was your daddy, was nothing but a fool!!! While you were sitting, home alone, at age 13, well your real daddy was dying!!” “Sorry you didn’t see him, but I’m glad we talked!!!!”
This is what Eddy Vedder’s mom told him in real life. She had cuckholded her husband (Eddy’s dad is the guy she slept with.) Eddy actually met his dad, but was told he was a “friend of the family.” He was a neighbor.
This perfectly illustrates the thinking of women. Their inability to use logic or understand how they hurt men and also their coldness and lack of love for their own children.
“Sorry you didn’t see him, but I’m glad we talked!” lzolzozlzozzo
I need not point out to the male readers the 3 distinctly ridiculous things about this sentence. As if her fucking feelings and whether she’s glad matter one iota at that moment.
Henceforth I will refer to that poster as Babes On Parade.
Game for science clam.
White coat = more open to logic. Open to rational discussion on the mechanics and pleasures of fucking. Intrigue based not totally on emotion and hampster, but on the possibility for discovery and cost-benefit analysis as well.
Perky D cup swimmer’s bodies with boy hair cuts? Fine if you need it right now. And they never want to cuddle.
Off topic but very germane to the Chateau…
Sheryl Sandberg and the Greivance Bridgade is out in full force today trolling for more victims of heinous microaggression that might end up with someone (though never of my ilk – white and male) having hurt feelings. (I believe the Stoics solved the problems of “hurt feelings” and other emotional disturbances 2500 years ago by appealling to the use of strictly rational thinking…but i digresss…)
The elite Intolerati (who in classic orwellian doublespeak claim exclusive rights to define and use the word …”tolerant”), have ramped up their efforts at thought control by wanting to BAN the word “bossy” being used to describe….bossy girls. Apparently using the correct word to describe someone who is being aggressive, demanding, and undeservedly entitled is outrageous oppression that can lead to horribly negative lifeoutcomes. Let’s celebrate and encourage latent narcissism instead! That can only have a positive outcome, no?
Once again normality is being put through the liberal reality inverter in their attempt to create a “utopia” of politically correct thought and speech through increased control of the individual and lessening of freedoms. I mean everyone is a unique and fragile snowflake that must be protected by their “betters” since they can’t possibly have the ability to work shit out on their own, right?
Liberals – infatilizing others since…
You know what else came and went?
Me.
Rape!
Interesting to note that all the “Women in Science that you should know” were thin. Not one waddling heffalump amongst the lot.
lzozlzolzlzlzlzl here’s the girl that was invited into the losats cockasz pit gby the pilot
https://www.facebook.com/jonti.roos?fref=ts
zlozlzozllll HB9
wonder if I’d have been invited?
more female privilege I guess
CH read this: http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/11/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-cockpit-companions/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
jesus fucking christ. Arab beta-but-I’m-a-pilot game.
slozlzzzlozzl
he fucking facebooked her after the flight.
sum: 2 Arab pilots invited two 17 year old hotties they saw in the line at the airport to ride the entire international flight in the losats cockas pit during the flight.
one is one of the missing plane pilots
Arafhd akfazie al Endiri Jabbar
zlzolzozl
http://www.today.com/health/princeton-mom-says-its-all-women-find-husbands-be-control-2D79357030