hbd chick asks,
if you were jason richwine, how would you have reframed the “discussion” about his thesis? wanna learn more about this reframing business.
For those readers who don’t know, Jason Richwine is was the Heritage Foundation data cruncher who got metaphorically burned at the stake (a witch hunt in all senses but for an actual pyre) and canned from his think tank job for a dissertation he wrote while at Harvard which trafficked in horrible, no good, very bad hatefacts.
Also, for those who don’t know, “reframing” is a well-known game concept that means to change the context of a conversation so that it is more personally advantageous to one’s goals. Reframing is an old sales technique (“Picture yourself owning this…”) that was reformatted for use as an applied seduction technique. Here’s the PUALingo definition of the term:
To say or do something that alters the context (“frame”) through which someone sees an idea or situation.
If the girl is shit testing the pick-up artist, he can reframe with a smarter remark or ignore her altogether. For example:
HB: Are you trying to pick us up? (in negative tone)
PUA: Is that the first thing you say to anyone who approaches you? I had a simple question to ask the group, but it’s alright, I will ask someone else more polite.
So what hbd chick is asking is for an explanation of how Richwine could have appropriated a powerful seduction technique to “seduce” the media gatekeepers and (dwindling) numbers of truly open-minded fence-sitters over to his side. Or to at least curb the frothing bloodlust of the witch hunters so that his job with Heritage was spared.
A very good question, for a lot of the tactics that successful womanizers use to bed women can also be put to good use in other social arenas.
First, a quick primer on reframing. A good reframe should flow from an attitude of self-amusement, or amused mastery. Self-amusement means you will respond to attacks against your character or your status with condescension, ridicule, sarcasm, or utter disregard.
A good reframe, like the one illustrated above, will put your interlocutor into the defensive crouch. In matters of seduction, the defensive crouch is where pussy tingles are born. In politics, it’s where The Narrative — aka The Cathedral, aka The Hivemind, aka The Anti-White Male Establishment — is undermined.
Reframing follows the principle of “The best defense is a good offense”. If a girl calls you a cad, you don’t apologize or try to deny it. That would be defensively acceding to her frame. Instead, you accuse her of being socially awkward. By putting her on the defensive, she is forced by the sudden change in momentum of the conversation, (and, if a crowd is assembled, by their expectation), to answer your charge. Answering charges is the lower status, WEAK POSITION. Delivering charges is the higher status, STRONG POSITION.
Chicks dig a man in the strong position.
And casual observers dig a data cruncher who stares down the lords of lies and calls their bluff.
So how could Richwine have reframed the national conversation about his factual findings — yes, remember, he was vilified for FACTUAL findings on the basis of BUT MY FEELINGS! AND THEIR FEELINGS! AND BIGOT! — so that he emerged from the ordeal perceived as an admirable man and his enemies the sputtering idiots they are?
There are FOUR main reframing methods, and I’ll give an example of a hypothetical Richwine response using all four.
THE TORCH-LIT MOB: Richwine, you have sinned against the Church of Anti-Racism. Your thesis is bigoted and hurtful!
RICHWINE: So hurtful, I know! The truth has that effect on lying pussies. I hope to send more of you into hysterics. You put on a good show. Dance, monkeys.
2. Ignore and redirect.
THE TORCH-LIT MOB: Richwine, you have sinned against the Church of Anti-Racism. Your thesis is bigoted and hurtful!
RICHWINE: Math is hard for a lot of people.
3. Self-serving misinterpretation.
THE TORCH-LIT MOB: Richwine, you have sinned against the Church of Anti-Racism. Your thesis is bigoted and hurtful!
RICHWINE: You really know how to make a guy feel powerful. But don’t worry, I don’t bite. You can stop pulling your skirts over your heads.
4. Flipping the script.
THE TORCH-LIT MOB: Richwine, you have sinned against the Church of Anti-Racism. Your thesis is bigoted and hurtful!
RICHWINE: I understand. You have to have a bad guy so you can feel like the good guy. But you can be more open-minded. Anyone can be, all it takes is having your awareness raised.
Now naturally, Richwine wouldn’t have to reframe with quite so much Heartiste-y flourish, but the concept is applicable to all modes, highbrow, lowbrow or shiv-woww, of verbal sparring. As long as you get the concept, the words will fall into place.
I suggest Geoffrey Miller, the latest sacrificial realtalker to be targeted by the angry equalist mob, get on board the reframe train. Forget apologetics, Geoff, that’ll only feed the beast’s hunger. You don’t bend over and make it easier for the fatass-rammers, especially not when the facts support your contention that fat craps really do have problems with self-discipline.
As for the personality traits mentioned above, Angelina Sutin and colleagues at the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health and Human Services, have conducted perhaps the ultimate study on this, using some 2000 participants, spanning over 50 years and applying 14 500 measurements of weight. And they didn’t just content themselves with the Big Five personality factors but looked at all the subscales. They found that weight gain was most clearly related to Impulsiveness (a facet of Neuroticism), Warmth, Assertiveness, Positive Emotions (all facets of Extraversion), and a lack of Order and Self-Discipline (facets of Conscientiousness). […]
So yes, the obese group is not unlike its negative stereotypes. Of the, “lazy”, “sloppy”, “less competent”, “lacking in self-discipline”, “disagreeable”, “less conscientious”, “poor role models”,” unintelligent”, “unsuccessful”, “weak-willed”, “unpleasant”, “overindulgent”, it seems “disagreeable” and “unpleasant” are the only clear misses.
This is not to hate on the obese, but to call a spade a spade. The idea that the problems of the obese are outside themselves is an unhealthy illusion here examplified by Slate Magazine’s Daniel Engber,
Stop hating. If we weren’t such unrepentant body bigots, fat people might earn more money, stay in school, and receive better medical care in hospitals and doctor’s offices. All that would go a long way toward mitigating the health effects of excess weight—and its putative costs
This under the false assumption that fat people have the same intelligence and Self-Discipline and that the reason they cancel appointments is not due to Impulsiveness and lack of Conscientiousness but only because of other peoples prejudice. In doing so, he enables fat people to stay fat and to blame society for their problems, and to, like the Obesity Society, view the condition as unrelated to willpower.
The harsh truth is that the obese are in a lot of trouble. They are less attractive in the workplace because of their combination of intelligence (or lack thereof) and personality. Work performance is best predicted by IQ scores and next best of Conscientiousness. Impulsive behavior on the other hand predicts crime and accidents. Most employers are probably not aware of the research linking obese people to these characteristics and outcomes, but they know from experience that employing an obese person is a financial risk with no apparent reward.
Chateau Heartiste is now offering PR services to any neoreactionary PACs.
this is useful stuff. apply it in all aspects of your life.
da secret
to gain da upper hand
is to SEIZE da buttehxtual POWER
and use it against dem
zlzozoozozoz
just as tucker mazx rheysm with hgoldman saxz got his publishing delas by sevrtely secretly taping butthext without the girl knowingz, ben bernankez maint9nasz his power by buttehxting thed dolalrz and buttehxting da colective anuthole of the ocmmon worker teacher saver and preacher.
so when u findy yoursfl buttehxted on all sidez
and tder is seemingly no wayz out
do not give up hope
nor despairz but
rememberz what da gbfm taught ye
King James Bible (Cambridge GBFM Ed.)
Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of butthext, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy GBFM rod and thy staff they comfort me, though not in my buttholiolzlozz wheerea da neeoctonthheet like 2 stickit zozlzlz.
lzozzozoz
And if you gaze for long into a buttholzizo, the buttholzizozlzo gazes also into you. – Nietzsche
The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s butthoizlzozoz lzolzoozozozooz. –Margaret Thatcher
“We contend that for a nation to try to butthext itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.”
― Winston S. Churchill
“Certainty? In this world nothing is certain but death and buttehxtz.”
― Benjamin Franklin
“No nation has ever buttehxted itself into prosperity. lzozozzozolz”
― Rush Limbaugh
The greatest destroyer of peace is abortion because if a mother can kill her own child, what is left for me to kill you and you to kill me? There is nothing between. -Mother Teresa
Hilarious.
“There is no means of avoiding the final butthexing of a boom brought about by bernankification lolzlzlzlzlz. The alternative is only whether the butthex should come sooner as the result of voluntary abandonment of further bernankification, or later as a final and total buttholzlzlzlz catastrophe of the currency system involved.”
– von Mises
lzozozozoz
Mizesz rockz!!!
Ludwig von Mises The gold standard has one tremendous virtue: the quantity of the money supply, under the gold standard, is independent of the policies of governments and political parties. This is its advantage. It is a form of protection against butthexting governments.
Ludwig von Mises The superiority of the gold standard consists in the fact that the value of gold develops independent of butthextual actions.
Ludwig von Mises The gold standard did not collapse. Governments butthexted it in order to pave the way for inflation. The whole grim apparatus of oppression and coercion, policemen, customs guards, penal lzozozo courts, prisons, in some countries even executioners and in others pound-me-in-the-ass butthetxing cell mates, had to be put into action in order to butthext the gold standard.
“This is its advantage. It is a form of protection against butthexting governments.”
“The gold standard did not collapse. Governments butthexted it in order to pave the way for inflation.”
Incongruent. Satoshi Nakamoto.
No.
Those statements are completely congruent.
Because the gold standard is a safeguard against money printing, the government benenrkeifieirz had to butthext the gold standard so they could butthext the currency in secretive meetings of the fed, congruent with how Tuckcer MAchcx rhyems with Goldmans SAxchs buttehxtes betas future wives in secrteiev taping sessisionsz, so as to deosul her and make her more loyal to da fed dan to a hsibandz god family chilrdenlzozz lzzozoozolzlz omgz lzlzolzozzoz
“No butthexhtation without representation” — American colonists
“I have not yet begun to butthex!” – John Paul Jones
“Do you believe in life after butthex?”
Cher
“Looks like I picked a bad day to stop sniffing butthext”
Lloyd Bentsen: “I knew GBFM; GBFM was a friend of mine. Senator, you’re no GBFM.”
To butthext, or not to butthext… that IS the question. – Hamlet (Shakespeare)
> “Cher: “Do you believe in life after __________?”
Ugh.
Given that it’s Cher, goodness only knows how that sentence might have originally ended.
Life after Herpes?
Life after bad plastic surgery?
LIfe after your only daughter undergoes a sex “change”?
Poor woman.
What the Frankfurt School giveth, the Frankfurt School taketh away.
Selling your soul to them comes with a price.
Reframe like Socrates. When asked what his punishment should be for corrupting the youth he replied that he should receive a salary for it. Richwine should have demanded more cash to keep publishing articles that the PC crowd could feel good about themselves by getting worked up into a bloodthirsty mob.
zllzozozozooz
“Veni, vidi, vicibuttthext” I came, I saw, I butthextedx. –Julian Ceasar
Butthexttam regit fortuna, non sapientia. – Bitthext, not wisdom, rules lives. -Ciero
Dum spirobutthexto, spero. – While I butthext, I hope.
Nihil tam munitum quod non expugnari pecunia possitbutthextum. – No fortification is such that it cannot be subdued with butthext.
Too droll… by a half… I can’t stop butthexing… eh, I mean sniggering.
> “HB: Are you trying to pick us up? (in negative tone)”
> “PUA: Is that the first thing you say to anyone who approaches you? I had a simple question to ask the group, but it’s alright, I will ask someone else more polite.”
Oh come on.
We can do better than that.
HB: Are you trying to pick me up? (in negative tone)
PUA [after looking at her fat ass with a frown on his face]: Honey, I ain’t that strong.
Nah.
“Nah” doesn’t work because it doesn’t leave you anywhere to go.
My line gives you at least two directions you can head in:
1) Go physical: “All right, I’ll make you a deal – I’ll start working out, if you’ll call 1-800-JENNY. Oh wait, my bad, I already work out.”
2) Go emotional: “Nah, I was talking about the Borderline Personality Disorder – I got better things to do than be a target for the pots and pans you’d be throwing my way – my Mama taught me to avoid all y’all high maintenance chicks.”
You’re digging a gaping hole there. Ok, playing Devil’s advocate:
1) Response: You workout? I couldn’t tell, because I didn’t think you could lift me anyway, but since you’re trying to pick me up after all, I’m not interested. [she gives a cute smile, and walks away, wiggling the ass you won’t get]
2) Response: I don’t date momma’s boys – now go away. [even more disdainful look]
Two Words: GOOD RIDDANCE.
Remember, the foundational principle behind “Game” – this movement to get hapless beta losers to grow up and start acting like MEN – the foundational principle is that YOU ARE THE PRIZE, not her.
So use “Game” as a filter to rid yourself of these horrible shrewish femcunt witches who would ruin your life if you were to get involved with them.
Life is too short to waste on misery.
The original line was applied to an “HB” which implied you’re intent is to tap that ass. Giving up at her first snappy comeback is not the essence of manhood. The proper thing to do is to hatefuck the femcunt witch out of her from behind while she speaks in tongues.
You can make snappy comeback after snappy comeback after snappy comeback – until the cows come home – but at sooner or later there needs to be some there there.
YOU: “My Mama taught me to avoid all y’all high maintenance chicks.”
HER: “I don’t date momma’s boys – now go away.”
YOU: “Pretty audacious from a Daddy’s girl like you.”
HER: “My father left home when I was six months old.”
YOU: “Cause your Mom was such a cheerful and friendly gal, just like you?”
HER: “No, because my Mom was already cheating on him with my StepDad.”
YOU: “And then you discovered that you preferred a little Step-Daddy action?”
HER: “Only when he was doing me in my anus, but one time he made the mistake of dropping his wad in my birth canal and I had to run off to the abortuary and murder his baby.”
At what point do start to realize that a conversation like this is a waste of the very air that you breath?
Use Game to write these chicks out of your life, and move on quickly to the chicks who have something more than utter darkness in their hearts.
[CH: Snappy “comebacks” are useful to seduction, but they are far from the whole story. A refresher course on the fundamentals of game is in order. There are three main stages: attraction, comfort, seduction. The three stages are themselves divided into stages, usually three each. Witty ripostes are a small part of one stage within the attraction stage.]
“Witty ripostes are a small part of one stage within the attraction stage.”
Right – at some point the purpose of the conversation is to get a little insight into who you’re dealing with.
And then to have a little playful fun within the confines of the conversation [as a prelude to a whole lotta playful fun within the confines of the bedsheets].
But if all you get out of the bitch is darkness upon darkness upon darkness [and, quite frankly, if that’s all she gets from you], then it’s just an exercise in pure, unadulterated nihilism.
Look, I’ve lived in college towns my whole life, and I know these dark, hateful, evil chicks like the back of my hand [the graduate schools are FILLED with ’em].
And I’m telling you: As soon as you realize that there’s no underlying human warmth in the chick whatsoever, then RUN DON’T WALK the hell away.
And thank Game for revealing it to you.
Sorry – somehow I fucked up the nestedness of this thread.
Totally agree with you, heartiste’s response is too long and thus not aloof enough. My take would have been:
HB: Are you trying to pick me up? (in negative tone)
PUA: Do you often have guys try to pick you up?
HB: Yes
PUA: *look her fat ass up and down* Really?
@Yeahokcool
Here’s some more useful stuff related to Richwine’s immigration stance, for Brits anyway, and eventually throughout the Whitelands.
Paul Weston on the Woolwich Killing, Islam and the State of Modern Britain
Dig: I am gonna print out this post and carry the damn thing with me. Its gold! Gold,Jerry! You see,I am fat. Tho I am high IQ and very conscientious in my work,I have a lot of the traits Miller discussed. I always try to put off the shit I should do,I am impulsive,and have low discipline. I know I need to change–and have known that for,as George Harrison might say, a long,long time. NOTE:The conflict between doing science honestyl and,well,not,is a profound one. The good guys gotta win this one!!
Add cnn.com to the list of unreadable webpages. CH, I need you to post more often. There are very few other readable pages on the internet. http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/03/us/new-york-students-off-plane/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
Sounds like those jooze needed to listen to the captain. Don’t blame him for kicking them off.
Orthodox kids going white water rafting?
He probably saved several lives.
Or maybe he feared the plane would be tough to control, the right wing overloaded like that.
llzozozlzlzlzlzozozozlzlzozozlzlzozlzlzozlzl
Miller’s study could be replicated to shine the light on so many less “safe” topics than obesity. No wonder they’re hitting him so hard.
To that point, I’ve always found the the rage cathedral zombies display in the face of uncomfortable facts hilarious. It belies the fact that they understand the implications, and therefore, know that they’re wrong.
People dont like the truth…it tends to not agree with the political position they are attempting to hoist upon us.
Hence why left/libtards insist honesty is “racist.”
FLAWLESS VICTORY!!!
On top of the game as always CH.
I would have very publicly called a press conference to respond to the charges, leak that I was going to give an apology at the press conference, then show up and speak one word: Nuts. Then stare at the assembled crowd of reporters with contempt for at least ten seconds. Then slowly walk off, ideally into the waiting arms of a hot chick.
“Nuts” no longer has the same effect on the 21st-Century ear that it had for the Panzer Corps at Borgogne.
In this context, the proper quip would be, “Kiss my lily-white ass.”
Emphasis on “lily”.
Bastogne. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_McAuliffe).
Can we preface “Kiss” with “Y’all Can”
gives it some extra salt.
Ack.
That was a Freudian slip on my part.
And I was re-reading the Wikipedia article on Bastogne right before I posted it.
You know, my brother warned me about this – he followed me over here from a reference at iSteve and he said that it took him all of about zero seconds to figure out who I was.
Gotta be more careful.
A lot more careful.
The reason “Nuts” would work is that the stupid, uneducated MSM reporters wouldn’t understand it. Many would likely speculate some nonsense reason Richwine uttered the word – like when the MSM ridiculed Palin for the “party like it’s 1773″ comment. Those would be the first stories out of the press conference.
Then some blogger would read one of these first reports and note who famously said “Nuts” and in what context. That story woudl go viral in the blogoshpere. The MSM reporters would look even more stupid and Richwine will have earned some serious badassery points not only for making the comment, but for anticipating the MSM wouldn’t know what it meant, report their ignorance, and make themselves look even greater fools.
Then, two days later, tweet the names of all the stupid MSM reporters who didn’t get the reference and say: Thanks for playing!
A fair point.
I’ve long-bemoaned the inability of the younger generations to recognize cultural homage and historical references.
Indeed, it’s the predominant cause of my jests falling flat here at the chateau… sigh.
Or for them– or the IRS these days– Roman’s Moronie’s best:
THE TORCH-LIT MOB: Richwine, you have sinned against the Church of Anti-Racism. Your thesis is bigoted and hurtful!
RICHWINE: Gay
At which point, you’ve not only inflamed the racist anti-racists, but also the homosexual crowd. Truth does not endear people to you. But I like it.
Richwine: U mad?
The Costanza gambit:
“Was that wrong? Should I not have done that? ‘Cause I gotta plead ignorance here.”
I would have given some version of my response here: http://educationrealist.wordpress.com/2013/05/12/jason-richwine-and-goring-the-medias-ox/
“Why are you pointing at my dissertation? I’ve written about this very topic for both Heritage and AIE. Here are the links. In fact, the NY Times was very interested in the piece I wrote basically restating my dissertation, and discussed it. I’ve written about the topic for several major papers.
So why not mention those? And given that I’ve been calling *teachers* stupid for several months, how come the subject didn’t come up then?”
“It couldn’t possibly be because you want to promote immigration rights, could it? I mean, far be it from me to suggest that you might have gone looking for something to discredit me because you have an ideological goal. But that’s sure what it seems like.
I seriously doubt any of those things would really have helped Richwine. It was simply too big, too public, too many torches and pitchforks and an organization’s entire credibility at risk. (Which was, of course, the point from the very beginning. Do you think anybody from the torches n’ pitchforks crowd *really* gave a shit what Richwine had done in college? This was about making Heritage look bad.)
NB: I’m not saying those tactics don’t work; they do. I’ve had them work for me. But they work best in small, controlled, interpersonal circumstances…when there isn’t much of a power differential between you and your opponent. You and your girlfriend, sure. You and a cop, not so much. You and your co-worker, sure. You and the EVP, not so much.
I actually agree with you. Which is weird, because I think you are some kind of woman.
Well of course he had no chance. This is reason # 532 why white male rage is justified. Also, this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zobl_DdcDgs#!
OK, so I’m probably poking a hornet’s nest with this, but…I watched the first couple of minutes of that video, and most of those girls don’t sound like they’re mocking their ex-boyfriends. They sound like the genuinely wish their exes well, and just wish they would move on. Other than the fact that they’re talking about it on camera at all–and thus exposing the exes to ridicule should they be recognized–the video doesn’t seem very rage-inducing to me.
What am I missing?
lzozlzozllo it’s so cute when a woman tries to think logically. The point is that this–again–illustrates that women are incapable of “love.” They *all* move on *easily* because they only seem to “love” while it suits their need to feel haaaaaappy and protected (and to have things bought for them). Contrary to popular mythology, men are the ones who are devastated and every man thought he was going to marry his first GF at age 19 and started to learn red pill when she dumped him and had no trouble moving on. Read the comments in the youtube link. 20 year old dumped men perplexed as to how she has a new man she’s “madly in love with” 7 days later.
The soul of a woman was created below.
– God
– Jesus
– Led Zepp
– All emperical evidence
– Science
– Truth
That. Is. All.
zlzoozozoz
http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/2013/06/05/zeuss-lightning-moses-thunder-da-reason-dey-banned-da-great-books-4-menz-is-dat-da-great-bookz-teach-of-the-true-nature-of-womenz-and-da-honor-of-men/
IN THE MIDST OF ZEUS’ LIGHTNING & MOSES’ THUNDER
A LOST GENERATION OF MEN BEHLD DA GBFM IN WONDER.
AS HE CAME DOWN FROM HIGH OFF THE MOUNTAIN PEAK
TO DELIVER DA TRUTH & HONOR ALL YOUNG MEN SEEK.
lzozozozololzoz
Lots of people talk and few of them know,soul of a woman was created below.
Every day I work so hard, bringin’ home my hard earned pay, Try to love you baby, but you push me away.-
lzozozozozoz
Da Reason Dey Banned da GREAT BOOKS 4 MENZ is dat da GREAT BOOKZ teach of the true nature of WOMENZ and da HONOR OF MEN.
HOMER TEACHES:
You have to watch out [20] She doesn’t carry off all your treasure. You know what a woman’s heart is like. She wants to enrich the house of the one who weds her, Never mind about her former children And the husband she once loved. Once he’s dead, [25] She doesn’t give any of them a thought. –Homer; Lombardo, Stanley; Murnaghan, Sheila (2010-07-02). Odyssey (Translated & Annotated) (Kindle Locations 6813-6817). Hackett Publishing. Kindle Edition.
lzozoozozlzozoz dat is because a owmenz is gudied by materialz insticnstinct and mater = mother = matter = material you fanabaoyz zlzloolzolzoz. DA ANCIENTZ KNEW IT–all dat da bernnkeifierz conceal and hidez as tehy d create false LAWS allowing womenz to arbitrarily transfer a man’s property and chirlederen to da state zlzlzlooz!!!
lzozozlzozozoz
read homers lodysysyey!! duh!!!!
homer’s odysysey teaches that if you stand up to womenz you get to FUCK them lzozozozo
if you don’t stand up to dem dey turn you into pigs
yes homer was alomst as brrilliaaiant as heartistse lzozozozozo:
HOMER’S ODYSSEY:
“‘And I will tell you of all the wicked witchcraft that Circe will
try to practise upon you. She will mix a mess for you to drink, and
she will drug the meal with which she makes it, but she will not be
able to charm you, for the virtue of the herb that I shall give you
will prevent her spells from working. I will tell you all about it.
When Circe strikes you with her wand, draw your sword and spring upon
her as though you were goings to kill her. She will then be frightened
and will desire you to go to bed with her; on this you must not point
blank refuse her, for you want her to set your companions free, and
to take good care also of yourself, but you make her swear solemnly
by all the blessed that she will plot no further mischief against
you, or else when she has got you naked she will unman you and make
you fit for nothing.’ ”
-http://classics.mit.edu/Homer/odyssey.mb.txt
zlzozozozozoz
ANOTHER GREAT PLACE IS IN GENESIES GENEIS IN DA BIBLE:
16 Unto the woman GOD said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
is it no wonder sad benerneiannkieirz funded fmeinnisnsmz to deconstruct the GRETA BOOKZ AND CLASSIZCXZ? zlozozzlzol
MORAL FRAILTY – THY NAME IS WOMANZ!!!! lzozozozo
HAMLET: HAMLET
O, that this too too solid flesh would melt
Thaw and resolve itself into a dew!
Or that the Everlasting had not fix’d
His canon ‘gainst self-slaughter! O God! God!
How weary, stale, flat and unprofitable,
Seem to me all the uses of this world!
Fie on’t! ah fie! ’tis an unweeded garden,
That grows to seed; things rank and gross in nature
Possess it merely. That it should come to this!
But two months dead: nay, not so much, not two:
So excellent a king; that was, to this,
Hyperion to a satyr; so loving to my mother
That he might not beteem the winds of heaven
Visit her face too roughly. Heaven and earth!
Must I remember? why, she would hang on him,
As if increase of appetite had grown
By what it fed on: and yet, within a month–
Let me not think on’t–Frailty, thy name is woman!–
A little month, or ere those shoes were old
With which she follow’d my poor father’s body,
Like Niobe, all tears:–why she, even she–
O, God! a beast, that wants discourse of reason,
Would have mourn’d longer–married with my uncle,
My father’s brother, but no more like my father
Than I to Hercules: within a month:
Ere yet the salt of most unrighteous tears
Had left the flushing in her galled eyes,
She married. O, most wicked speed, to post
With such dexterity to incestuous sheets!
It is not nor it cannot come to good:
But break, my heart; for I must hold my tongue.
http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/2013/06/05/zeuss-lightning-moses-thunder-da-reason-dey-banned-da-great-books-4-menz-is-dat-da-great-bookz-teach-of-the-true-nature-of-womenz-and-da-honor-of-men/
lzozozozozo
and SO YOU CAN SEE WHY DEY HAD TO CRUCIFY DA
GREAT BOOKS OF, BY, AND 4 MENZ!!!
SO AS TO DENY YE YER NEATURAL RIGHTSZ! lzozlzl
I’ll be concise. I would add—again talking about women who are 7s and 8s only (hot chicks)—there is literally a “failure to communicate” between the beta male being dumped and the dumping 7 or 8 girl in this scenario. Another factor, that I have not yet mentioned, is that the 7 or 8 girl *knows* that she will get hit on several times (if she leaves her house) that very day, and even if she does not like the guys because they are not alpha enough, at a minimum it will be flattering to her, build her ego, be nice to be noticed, etc. The 7 or 8 dumper (woman) literally does not even have to go ONE DAY without the attention from and offers from other men, and several of them most likely will even be good looking men who she could be interested in if he says the right things with the right alpha attitude. On the other hand, the beta male being dumped, the dumpee, knows that it could be 3 or 8 months before he gets the attention of another suitable (7 or above) girl. Hence the 7 or 8 dumper-girl literally cannot understand the beta male dumpees inability to easily flip the switch and let go (like she can). I used to have this argument with my 7.5 ex GF all the time. She’s a blogger and she’s very high IQ and blogs about her art and stuff, but one day she blogged about a new exercise class she found and she liked it because one of the things was she could expect to NOT get hit on. Boo hooo hoo says the beta male. We simply cannot understand how 7 and 8 girls complain about being hit on constantly. As the men who have to do the approaching, we would *love* if the situation were reversed and 7 and 8 girls were hitting on us constantly. No, it doesn’t happen. So we see the bitching by the 7 and 8 girls as stupid and lacking gratitude for their privileged lot in life. Men and women literally can’t communicate verbally and that’s why the best thing is for a man to simply be alpha or apply game and force himself physically on the girl, which is what they actually, being meat eating mammals.
Both dumping and being dumped are pretty much part of the universal human experience. For every guy whose girlfriend dumped him and moved on immediately, leaving him to pine, there’s a girl whose guy dumped her and moved on immediately, leaving her to pine. It sucks, it hurts, but it happens to (well, almost) all of us, regardless of sex. Depending on the length of the relationship, it’s normal to mourn its loss for anywhere from a couple of weeks to a few months.
The takeaway from that video shouldn’t be “women are incapable of love.” It should be “try to avoid falling in love with a woman who would have no problem putting your business all over the street, and, barring that, go full no-contact after the breakup so she won’t have any business to put out there.”
That’s the point!!! Men have extreme difficulty going full no contact after “the” breakup or even knowing when “the” breakup happened. Women have no trouble going full silent treatment and act as if they never even knew the man and literally wish he would disappear from this earth. After all of that, nevertheless, the man will pray every night for her happiness.
Typical woman u completely miss the point by continually harping on putting business in the street. These women were approached by interviewer on the street who referred to “any” boyfriend and–do I really need to say this????–no names or even identifying clues were used. The point, to any person capable of logic, is the NATURE of the differences between how women (7s or above) have ALL experienced begging exes sending flowers, poems, mix tapes, etc shortly after or DURING “the” breakup (when it theoretically is not over) and 1. The women find it creepy and 2 the situation has never been reversed. No 7 woman in history has written poems to try to win guy back during the breakup. Etc.
It isn’t difficult to go no-contact. This person has expressed his/her desire to not be with you anymore. So you walk away. You delete their number out of your phone, you block their e-mail and delete their contact, you block them on any social media you’re on, you don’t discuss anything with any mutual friends you may still have.
Easy.
Re
Ur last response, only a woman could say that. U don’t get it.
Men’s sexual priority is pleasure and physical affection and the bonding that comes with that. Women’s priority is babies and/or resources, and securing loyalty. So of course breakups are going to be different. Women have a limited time of fertility and looking our best. If we snooze, we lose.
Lots of women play at it to secure stability, but very few women are actually interested in the sexuality as a means of bonding with a man as a person and not as a tool. Those of us who are sign up for a world of pain.
I wouldn’t have it any other way, but it is still a world of pain that admittedly, I do not have the inherent tools to endure without the assistance of male friends. If I had to rely only on female friends to get through breakups with guys I really thought I was bonding with but that turned out to be one-sided, I’d have suicided long ago.
Credit where due, Nicole… well said, and even a might touching.
Had you been here before me, I would have taken you for ride on my motorcycle, just to experience a well-deserved few moments of exhilaration and joyous abandon.
@Nicole you said something really smart a few weeks ago too and I tried to say as much but didn’t get thru spam filter. CH, please post. I mean to point out from time to time that, yes, all of the manosphere bitching about women being selfish and mean, etc APPLIES ONLY TO 7s and above. It woudl absolutely suck to be a fat or ugly (or both) woman 5 or below or perhaps even 6 (what I call a “plain jane” who’s thin but a little skinny-fat…). I would *not* want to live on this Earth as such a woman. All of my complaining about women being mean and the women who have been mean to me, who require game and date assholes, etc. , again, is really targetted at the 7s and 8s who are indeed special (not that they have earned it) by being pretty and thin, which is exceedingly rare in today’s United States. So they get hit on an approached literally 3 to 15 times daily and they develop what we men see as “bitch shield” etc and all the stuff that is examined on this blog. So yeah….back @ Rappinci’s…a 7 or 8 girl like the ones in that vid just don’t get it. You must be a 7 or 8 too (???). It is most certainly *not* easy for THE MAN to simply delete all numbers and social media and respect her wishes to end it after, say, 3 years of her letting him do whatever he wants to do to her body. It is confusing to the man. Men are from mars, women are from venus…it really is true. Neither side is evil, but it hurts real bad to be a beta male (greater beta) who gets dumped by a 7 or 8. We have all been there, with the poetry writing, flowers, songs, etc. See… a beta (not an omega) or greater beta *does* get laid from time to time and manages to have an LTR with a 7 or 8 or two, but eventually gets dumped by the 7 or 8 for being too beta (see the cute girls in that vid for the result). The woman—and Nicole’s comment touches on this—who used to give her body and “love” to the man can literally SUDDENLY switch off that “love” literally as easily as she switches a light switch off. Literally. That is literally true. That is not true of the man, who remains in love with his image of her and, to be blunt, would still be perfectly happy dating her despite whatever fights they had quite simply because he still wants to be able to touch her boobs. It is literally that literally true and simple. My ex GF offers me nothing other than a nice set of “cute boobs” (her words, and she’s wright). She’s a total bitch to me, has no money, and offers me nothing, and now no affection, but I still wrote her poems, sang her songs, etc because I want to be able to see her naked in the shower just like I did 2 weeks ago (4 months ago now…but going back in time).
See “the” breakup to which you refer is not even a clearly drawn line to the guy. The guy wants to continue the conversation and work it out. But the woman has literally “flipped the light switch” just like that, perhaps literally after she let him fuck her less than 24 hours earlier, and at that point she is able to treat the man (who she let fuck her for 3 years) AS IF SHE NEVER EVEN KNEW HIM!!! This is part of CH’s 16 rules if you read it. Or she will actively resent him with a seething contempt not even a convicted rapist could inspire (actually she affirmatively tingles for the rapist) and she will consider his poetry and nice messages, etc, which really do reflect a real “love” and agony he’s going through, as “creepy” or “stalkerish.”
Men and women are truly, literally, unable to communicate or argue logically about this type of situation.
But again I’m talking about 7s and 8s. Every single 7 and 8 woman in this country has at one point dumped her beta boyfriend – who she used to let fuck her – and then received poetry, crying, mix tapes, flowers, etc and she had flipped off the switch and was (amazingly, from the guy’s perspective) able to view him as “creepy” – the man she “loved” perhaps 24 hours earlier.
Women flip the switch and, boom, they move on and are gone. Rappinci’s comment captures her unawareness of the pain of a beta male in this situation perfectly. For the man, it is most certainly not easy. That is why if you look at that vid on youtube, you’ll find 500 “similar vids” that are called “how to get over your ex girlfriend.” Men have to be TAUGHT this, just as they have to be taught game (how to not follow their natural instinct to….be NICE to stupid women!!!!! This is empirical, incontrovertible fact.
As a good looking greater beta who has had my share of sex with 7s and 8s, but also my share of eventually getting dumped, I would go ahead and say that being a beta in this country, today, is about as terrible as being a fat 5-or-less woman. It is misery for both of us and the only people who have fun and the only men who would dispute what I’m saying are true alphas who do the dumping because they easily get the next pussy right away.
Oh that’s the other thing. The pain for the beta male is based also on the knowledge that it will take him 6 months to a year to find the next girl willing to have sex with him. It sucks, to be blunt. That is why “one-itus” exists between greater betas and 7s and 8s they manage to land (for a while).
@DivorcedDad: As you were describing how difficult it is for some men to process a break-up, you touched on something telling:
“would still be perfectly happy dating her despite whatever fights they had quite simply because he still wants to be able to touch her boobs.”
Knowing that he only wants her around so he can touch her boobs makes it much easier to walk away.
I know this is one of those Mars/Venus things, as many men would be perfectly happy to be seen as a life-support system for a dick. But women tend to be a little touchy about being seen that way. When feminists spout off about “objectification,” that’s what they’re talking about. Now, some of us can accept on an abstract level that objectifying is what men do.
However, we like to kid ourselves that the *specific* guy whom we allow to touch our boobs sees us as something other than a life-support system for same. When confronted with conflicting evidence…well. Bye.
TL;DR: If what you love is the set of holes, not the woman who surrounds them, at least do a good job of hiding that fact or she will feel zero remorse about walking away and never speaking to you again.
Divorced Dad, I only have one tiny disagreement with what you’ve said, and that is that I believe it doesn’t really matter how the girl looks beautywise. I was like this even when I was a cute 16 year old, and despite being at that time, a 100 lbs. postergrrrl for feminist fitness and combat. Fatherly influence is the most important factor in this.
Rappacini’s Daughter, there is no such thing as a man wanting a woman around only to touch her boobs. There are so many boobs in this world, new ones turning 16-18 (depending on local laws) every day. If a man wants your boobs more than once, he wants them because of the woman around them. Rest assured.
I understand women have to tell themselves things to make a man seem more evil after a breakup. I do this myself. The truth is that when a man dumps you, it’s not about you unless you were just horribly cruel or disloyal to him. It’s about him.
He could not contain or stabilize you, and he knows it, so he sets you free to find someone who can.
There are some exceptions, like truly evil guys who prey on vulnerable women, but with some experience I’ve learned that some guys who seem that way are not that way intentionally. Usually a warped worldview is to blame. This is usually curable.
For the most part though, some objectification is bound to happen both ways, but this is accounted to love being a verb, not just a noun. Loving someone is something that requires action and presence to make it a relationship and not just a feeling, and women need to get used to that fact.
Whatever women may tell themselves that makes it easier for them to walk away is cool in an evolutionary sense. Time is ticking and all. This doesn’t make it really legitimate though. The guy isn’t really objectifying her and that’s all. He just wants to touch her specifically because that’s how men need to express their affection.
His words, not mine, Nicole. Here’s another quote:
“My ex GF offers me nothing other than a nice set of “cute boobs” (her words, and she’s wright). She’s a total bitch to me, has no money, and offers me nothing, and now no affection, but I still wrote her poems, sang her songs, etc because I want to be able to see her naked in the shower…”
She offers him nothing but a set of “cute boobs,” and that’s what he’s pining for. Otherwise, he can’t stand her.
A testament to the power of boobs.
Ah, I remember when I first came here, and didn’t appreciate the wonderful powers of my body because I was too focused on the bad endings. I didn’t consider the relatively long and tender durings.
Boobs can somehow override 20+ years of cultural programming long enough that a man will sustain a relationship until he is down to the wire and must marry someone socially acceptable.
Apparently they can also convince a man to write poetry for a woman who treats him like crap.
In what way is this a bad thing? Doesn’t it give you, a fairly cool woman, hope?
@Nicole @Rapaccini’s again Nicole is right!! Rappaccini, that is the point!!! That is my point!!!! Women (pretty women 7 or above) get all sorts of very serious benefits every single day of their lives literally because men want to be able to touch boobs. It is really that simple. That’s not what we beta men can’t understand. What we can’t understand is the extreme *lack of gratitude” on the part of women for this circumstance. Not only are you not thankful for it, you go the other way and COMPLAIN about it!!!!! Men are from mars….we just can’t understand it. Every woman 7 or above is the beneficiary of dozens of random acts of kindness every single day that she not only is not thankful for, she does not even NOTICE!!! We are in agreement but from different sides of the fense Rappacinni. We are saying the same thing!! Yes Nicole. I wrote her poems etc and betas do it every day at the end of a relationship after the woman has flipped the switch and now must rationalze and make the guy’s mistakes (usually something like being a boring beta who complained about spending so much money) way worse than they actually were to rationalize her biologically-required hatred of him at that point.
THE GIRL WHO KICKED THE HORNET’S NEST, by Rappaccini’s Daughter.
Shhhh, don’t go against the community dogma. Even your apologies and qualifiers won’t help. They’re taking down “The Cathedral” here, dissent is frowned upon.
Of course “those tactics … work best in small, controlled, interpersonal circumstances,” but don’t be a buzzkill with things like contrary perspectives and common sense, womyn.
[CH: Oh, they work in large groups too. How do you think anyone gets elected?]
…says the guy who has called me a whore, a tranny, a Frankenstein’s monster and expressed a desire to see me slapped around.
Not that I minded. I was just a bit miffed that you neglected to pull my hair while you were doing it. Manners are important, Matt.
Our Jesus Freak is nothing if not inconsistent.
Just say goodbye to the people hating on you
…says the guy who has called me a whore, a tranny, a Frankenstein’s monster and expressed a desire to see me slapped around.
I thought you wanted to be treated like a man. Welcome to the constant abuse of the masculine world.
You think this is a neg? You think these are negs, you cocksucker? You can’t take this, how can you take the negs you get on a sit? You don’t like it, leave.
Anyway, that was all, like, so five days ago. Big hands, I know you’re the one.
Matt
Video is fantastic, kubla.
No, I’m pretty sure those aren’t negs, Matt. Based of what I’ve read here, negs are supposed to be left-handed compliments…bait…a little barb of criticism wrapped in a layer of plausible deniability. Ideally, the subject of the neg is not quite certain that she has been insulted. The idea is to get the woman to qualify herself, not to dump her drink in your lap and/or have the bouncer throw your ass out.
That’s not what you were doing in any of the above cases; you were transparently casting about for something that would hurt my feelings.
But hey…a kiss with a fist is better than none!
That young lady in the video seems very empowered.
Hey, he quoted Violent Femmes at me. Tit for tat (and as tunes about mutual domestic violence go, it’s actually rather catchy).
zlozozozoz
ZEUS’ LIGHTNING & MOSES’ THUNDER: Da Reason Dey Banned da GREAT BOOKS 4 MENZ is dat da GREAT BOOKZ teach of the true nature of WOMENZ and da HONOR OF MEN.
IN THE MIDST OF ZEUS’ LIGHTNING & MOSES’ THUNDER
A LOST GENERATION OF MEN BEHLD DA GBFM IN WONDER.
AS HE CAME DOWN FROM HIGH OFF THE MOUNTAIN PEAK
TO DELIVER DA TRUTH & HONOR ALL YOUNG MEN SEEK.
lzozozozololzoz
Lots of people talk and few of them know,soul of a woman was created below.
Every day I work so hard, bringin’ home my hard earned pay, Try to love you baby, but you push me away.-
LED ZEPPELIN – DAZED AND CONFUSED LYRICS
Da Reason Dey Banned da GREAT BOOKS 4 MENZ is dat da GREAT BOOKZ teach of the true nature of WOMENZ and da HONOR OF MEN.
HOMER TEACHES:
You have to watch out [20] She doesn’t carry off all your treasure. You know what a woman’s heart is like. She wants to enrich the house of the one who weds her, Never mind about her former children And the husband she once loved. Once he’s dead, [25] She doesn’t give any of them a thought. –Homer; Lombardo, Stanley; Murnaghan, Sheila (2010-07-02). Odyssey (Translated & Annotated) (Kindle Locations 6813-6817). Hackett Publishing. Kindle Edition.
lzozoozozlzozoz dat is because a owmenz is gudied by materialz insticnstinct and mater = mother = matter = material you fanabaoyz zlzloolzolzoz. DA ANCIENTZ KNEW IT–all dat da bernnkeifierz conceal and hidez as tehy d create false LAWS allowing womenz to arbitrarily transfer a man’s property and chirlederen to da state zlzlzlooz!!!
OK EVERYONEZ!!
CLASS IS IN SESSION!!!
IN THE COMMENTS, leave samples and excerpts from the GREAT BOOKZ which teach game!! AND also note how the GREAT BOOKZ they teach thingz GREATER THAN GAME (such as honor and civilizatin and freedom from punnanaizz zlozzoz and freedom form butthext) as there is more to life than being the 27th PUA to game some buttehxt off a modenrz ebebernankifed deousled womenz zlzozolzlzlozlzozoolzolzozlzloz
HEre is one for starters:
lzozozlzozozoz
read homers lodysysyey!! duh!!!!
homer’s odysysey teaches that if you stand up to womenz you get to FUCK them lzozozozo
if you don’t stand up to dem dey turn you into pigs
yes homer was alomst as brrilliaaiant as heartistse lzozozozozo:
HOMER’S ODYSSEY:
“‘And I will tell you of all the wicked witchcraft that Circe will
try to practise upon you. She will mix a mess for you to drink, and
she will drug the meal with which she makes it, but she will not be
able to charm you, for the virtue of the herb that I shall give you
will prevent her spells from working. I will tell you all about it.
When Circe strikes you with her wand, draw your sword and spring upon
her as though you were goings to kill her. She will then be frightened
and will desire you to go to bed with her; on this you must not point
blank refuse her, for you want her to set your companions free, and
to take good care also of yourself, but you make her swear solemnly
by all the blessed that she will plot no further mischief against
you, or else when she has got you naked she will unman you and make
you fit for nothing.’ ”
-http://classics.mit.edu/Homer/odyssey.mb.txt
zlzozozozozoz
ANOTHER GREAT PLACE IS IN GENESIES GENEIS IN DA BIBLE:
16 Unto the woman GOD said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
is it no wonder sad benerneiannkieirz funded fmeinnisnsmz to deconstruct the GRETA BOOKZ AND CLASSIZCXZ? zlozozzlzol
HAMLET: HAMLET
O, that this too too solid flesh would melt
Thaw and resolve itself into a dew!
Or that the Everlasting had not fix’d
His canon ‘gainst self-slaughter! O God! God!
How weary, stale, flat and unprofitable,
Seem to me all the uses of this world!
Fie on’t! ah fie! ’tis an unweeded garden,
That grows to seed; things rank and gross in nature
Possess it merely. That it should come to this!
But two months dead: nay, not so much, not two:
So excellent a king; that was, to this,
Hyperion to a satyr; so loving to my mother
That he might not beteem the winds of heaven
Visit her face too roughly. Heaven and earth!
Must I remember? why, she would hang on him,
As if increase of appetite had grown
By what it fed on: and yet, within a month–
Let me not think on’t–Frailty, thy name is woman!–
A little month, or ere those shoes were old
With which she follow’d my poor father’s body,
Like Niobe, all tears:–why she, even she–
O, God! a beast, that wants discourse of reason,
Would have mourn’d longer–married with my uncle,
My father’s brother, but no more like my father
Than I to Hercules: within a month:
Ere yet the salt of most unrighteous tears
Had left the flushing in her galled eyes,
She married. O, most wicked speed, to post
With such dexterity to incestuous sheets!
It is not nor it cannot come to good:
But break, my heart; for I must hold my tongue.
SHOEPNHAUER:
The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower is it in reaching maturity. Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental faculties scarcely before he is eight-and-twenty; woman when she is eighteen; but hers is reason of very narrow limitations. This is why women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling matters to the most important. It is by virtue of man’s reasoning powers that he does not live in the present only, like the brute, but observes and ponders over the past and future; and from this spring discretion, care, and that anxiety which we so frequently notice in people. The advantages, as well as the disadvantages, that this entails, make woman, in consequence of her weaker reasoning powers, less of a partaker in them. Moreover, she is intellectually short-sighted, for although her intuitive understanding quickly perceives what is near to her, on the other hand her circle of vision is limited and does not embrace anything that is remote; hence everything that is absent or past, or in the future, affects women in a less degree than men. This is why they have greater inclination for extravagance, which sometimes borders on madness. Women in their hearts think that men are intended to earn money so that they may spend it, if possible during their husband’s lifetime, but at any rate after his death.
As soon as he has given them his earnings on which to keep house they are strengthened in this belief. Although all this entails many disadvantages, yet it has this advantage—that a woman lives more in the present than a man, and that she enjoys it more keenly if it is at all bearable. This is the origin of that cheerfulness which is peculiar to woman and makes her fit to divert man, and in case of need, to console him when he is weighed down by cares. To consult women in matters of difficulty, as the Germans used to do in old times, is by no means a matter to be overlooked; for their way of grasping a thing is quite different from ours, chiefly because they like the shortest way to the point, and usually keep their attention fixed upon what lies nearest; while we, as a rule, see beyond it, for the simple reason that it lies under our nose; it then becomes necessary for us to be brought back to the thing in order to obtain a near and simple view. This is why women are more sober in their judgment than we, and why they see nothing more in things than is really there; while we, if our passions are roused, slightly exaggerate or add to our imagination.
It is because women’s reasoning powers are weaker that they show more sympathy for the unfortunate than men, and consequently take a kindlier interest in them. On the other hand, women are inferior to men in matters of justice, honesty, and conscientiousness. Again, because their reasoning faculty is weak, things clearly visible and real, and belonging to the present, exercise a power over them which is rarely counteracted by abstract thoughts, fixed maxims, or firm resolutions, in general, by regard for the past and future or by consideration for what is absent and remote. Accordingly they have the first and principal qualities of virtue, but they lack the secondary qualities which are often a necessary instrument in developing it. Women may be compared in this respect to an organism that has a liver but no gall-bladder.9 So that it will be found that the fundamental fault in the character of women is that they have no “sense of justice.” This arises from their deficiency in the power of reasoning already referred to, and reflection, but is also partly due to the fact that Nature has not destined them, as the weaker sex, to be dependent on strength but on cunning; this is why they are instinctively crafty, and have an ineradicable tendency to lie. For as lions are furnished with claws and teeth, elephants with tusks, boars with fangs, bulls with horns, and the cuttlefish with its dark, inky fluid, so Nature has provided woman for her protection and defence with the faculty of dissimulation, and all the power which Nature has given to man in the form of bodily strength and reason has been conferred on woman in this form. Hence, dissimulation is innate in woman and almost as characteristic of the very stupid as of the clever. Accordingly, it is as natural for women to dissemble at every opportunity as it is for those animals to turn to their weapons when they are attacked; and they feel in doing so that in a certain measure they are only making use of their rights. Therefore a woman who is perfectly truthful and does not dissemble is perhaps an impossibility. This is why they see through dissimulation in others so easily; therefore it is not advisable to attempt it with them. From the fundamental defect that has been stated, and all that it involves, spring falseness, faithlessness, treachery, ungratefulness, and so on. In a court of justice women are more often found guilty of perjury than men. It is indeed to be generally questioned whether they should be allowed to take an oath at all. From time to time there are repeated cases everywhere of ladies, who want for nothing, secretly pocketing and taking away things from shop counters.
HAMLET:
OPHELIA
Good my lord,
How does your honour for this many a day?
HAMLET
I humbly thank you; well, well, well.
OPHELIA
My lord, I have remembrances of yours,
That I have longed long to re-deliver;
I pray you, now receive them.
HAMLET
No, not I;
I never gave you aught.
OPHELIA
My honour’d lord, you know right well you did;
And, with them, words of so sweet breath composed
As made the things more rich: their perfume lost,
Take these again; for to the noble mind
Rich gifts wax poor when givers prove unkind.
There, my lord.
HAMLET
Ha, ha! are you honest?
OPHELIA
My lord?
HAMLET
Are you fair?
OPHELIA
What means your lordship?
HAMLET
That if you be honest and fair, your honesty should
admit no discourse to your beauty.
OPHELIA
Could beauty, my lord, have better commerce than
with honesty?
HAMLET
Ay, truly; for the power of beauty will sooner
transform honesty from what it is to a bawd than the
force of honesty can translate beauty into his
likeness: this was sometime a paradox, but now the
time gives it proof. I did love you once.
OPHELIA
Indeed, my lord, you made me believe so.
HAMLET
You should not have believed me; for virtue cannot
so inoculate our old stock but we shall relish of
it: I loved you not.
OPHELIA
I was the more deceived.
HAMLET
Get thee to a nunnery: why wouldst thou be a
breeder of sinners? I am myself indifferent honest;
but yet I could accuse me of such things that it
were better my mother had not borne me: I am very
proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offences at
my beck than I have thoughts to put them in,
imagination to give them shape, or time to act them
in. What should such fellows as I do crawling
between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves,
all; believe none of us. Go thy ways to a nunnery.
Where’s your father?
SHOPENHAUER:
In India no woman is ever independent, but each one stands under the control of her father or her husband, or brother or son, in accordance with the law of Manu.
It is certainly a revolting idea that widows should sacrifice themselves on their husband’s dead body; but it is also revolting that the money which the husband has earned by working diligently for all his life, in the hope that he was working for his children, should be wasted on her paramours. Medium tenuere beati. The first love of a mother, as that of animals and men, is purely instinctive, and consequently ceases when the child is no longer physically helpless. After that, the first love should be reinstated by a love based on habit and reason; but this often does not appear, especially where the mother has not loved the father. The love of a father for his children is of a different nature and more sincere; it is founded on a recognition of his own inner self in the child, and is therefore metaphysical in its origin.
In almost every nation, both of the new and old world, and even among the Hottentots, property is inherited by the male descendants alone; it is only in Europe that one has departed from this. That the property which men have with difficulty acquired by long-continued struggling and hard work should afterwards come into the hands of women, who, in their want of reason, either squander it within a short time or otherwise waste it, is an injustice as great as it is common, and it should be prevented by limiting the right of women to inherit. It seems to me that it would be a better arrangement if women, be they widows or daughters, only inherited the money for life secured by mortgage, but not the property itself or the capital, unless there lacked male descendants. It is men who make the money, and not women; therefore women are neither justified in having unconditional possession of it nor capable of administrating it. Women should never have the free disposition of wealth, strictly so-called, which they may inherit, such as capital, houses, and estates. They need a guardian always; therefore they should not have the guardianship of their children under any circumstances whatever. The vanity of women, even if it should not be greater than that of men, has this evil in it, that it is directed on material things—that is to say, on their personal beauty and then on tinsel, pomp, and show. This is why they are in their right element in society. This it is which makes them inclined to be extravagant, especially since they possess little reasoning power. Accordingly, an ancient writer says, [Greek: Gunae to synolon esti dapanaeron physei].10 Men’s vanity, on the other hand, is often directed on non-material advantages, such as intellect, learning, courage, and the like. Aristotle explains in thePolitics11 the great disadvantages which the Spartans brought upon themselves by granting too much to their women, by allowing them the right of inheritance and dowry, and a great amount of freedom; and how this contributed greatly to the fall of Sparta. May it not be that the influence of women in France, which has been increasing since Louis XIII.‘s time, was to blame for that gradual corruption of the court and government which led to the first Revolution, of which all subsequent disturbances have been the result? In any case, the false position of the female sex, so conspicuously exposed by the existence of the “lady,” is a fundamental defect in our social condition, and this defect, proceeding from the very heart of it, must extend its harmful influence in every direction. That woman is by nature intended to obey is shown by the fact that every woman who is placed in the unnatural position of absolute independence at once attaches herself to some kind of man, by whom she is controlled and governed; this is because she requires a master. If she, is young, the man is a lover; if she is old, a priest.
lzozolzl good thing
that the GBFM
is a RICH NOBL MILITARY OFFICER
in my ARMY OF ONE lzozlzlzllozozooz
dat is ONE LOTATSSA COCKASZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lzozozozozoz
THE GREAT BOOKS TEACH GAMEZZZ!!!
the following is from: http://www.womenintheancientworld.com/whatathenianmensaid.htm
“1) Aristotle said that man is by nature superior to the female and so the man should rule and the woman should be ruled.[1]
2) Demosthenes wrote “We keep hetaerae for the sake of pleasure, females slaves for our daily care and wives to give us legitimate children and to be the guardians of our households.”[2]
3) “A man who teaches a woman to write should know that he is providing poison to an asp.”[3]
4) Euripides has women characters make disparaging remarks about their sex:
a) I am only a woman, a thing which the world hates.[4]
b) No cure has been found for a woman’s venom, worse than that of reptiles. We are a curse to man.[5]
c) Men of sense should never let gossiping women visit their wives, for they work mischief.[6]
5) Hipponax, whose writing is quite abusive anyway, had this to say about women: “There are two days on which a woman is most pleasing—when someone marries her and when he carries out her dead body.”[7] This aphorism probably should be ignored, coming as it does from a Sixth Century BCE Ephesian whose malicious temperament left him with few friends in the land of his birth and very little good to say about anyone, but the remark is quoted too often today to be left out.
6) Hyperides said, “A woman who travels outside her house should be old enough that people ask whose mother she is, not whose wife she is.”[8]
7) In his Funeral Speech Pericles said, “A woman’s reputation is highest when men say little about her, whether it be good or evil.”[9]
It seems clear, then, that Athenians saw women as beguiling creatures capable of causing considerable harm to themselves and others, and weaker in mind and body than men. Many believed that young girls were somewhat wild and difficult to control and that virgins were subject to hallucinations that could encourage them to be self-destructive. The solution was an early marriage, for only after a woman had delivered her first baby could she be a fully-operational female.
“
zlzozozlolzoz
ONLY THOSE WHO HAVE NEVER READ HTE GRET BOOKS FOR MEN
WOULD STATE
THAT THE GREAT BOKS 4 MENZ
DO NOT TEACH GAMEZ Zlzolzlzlz
Th following is form:
http://www.womenintheancientworld.com/women%20and%20the%20law%20in%20ancient%20israel.htm
“WOMEN AND THE LAW IN ANCIENT ISRAEL
The Ancient Hebrew law code outlined in the Bible unfortunately lacks the detail that can be found in other ancient legal systems such as the Babylonian and Roman, but we can at least summarize the general principles.
1. Marriage was called “taking a wife”
2. It involved sexual intercourse
3. While there was no death penalty in Hebrew law for property crimes, adultery was a capital offence for both participants.
4. Marriage and children were necessary to have a fulfilled life. A childless woman could call herself a mother by giving her maid-servant to her husband as a second wife (assuming, of course, the maid-servant did indeed produce a child).
5. A widow had the right to marry her husband’s brother if he lived in the same town.
6. Polygyny was permitted but uncommon.
7. Divorce was easy for a man and impossible for a woman.
8. Childlessness was the most common reason for divorce
9. The woman moved to the husband’s home and family
10. While the husband was clearly the boss, each expected love from the other and a wife had the legal right to support.”
ONE OF THE MOST HILARIOUS THINGZZ IS HOW
SO MANY FATHERLESS RITALIN RAISED PUSUSYSYSYYSS FANBOYZ SAY
“WELL THE GREAT BOOKS TEACH NOTHING OF GAMEZZZ lzozozlzolz”
THIS IS WHY THE MODERN CHURCHIANZ HAVE BANISHED THE BIBLEZ: lzozozzozo
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/womens_rights.html
“Genesis 3:16Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
Isaiah 3:12As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them.
1 Corinthians 11:3But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.
1 Corinthians 14:34-36Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.
Ephesians 5:22-24Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.
Colossians 3:18Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord.
1 Timothy 2:11-15Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing.
Titus 2:4-5Teach the young women to be … obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.
1 Peter 3:1Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands.”
SOMEDAY WHEN ALL D PUASZ GET BORED WITH STERILE BUTTOCKINGZ SESSIOZN tehy will return to d a GREAT BOOKZ FOR MENZ RENAISSANZESZ zlzlzlzllzlzlzz
Agree with rappacini here- facts weren’t the point, it was a straight-up partisan show trial, Stalin-style, with the Walter Duranty paper of record reprising its role. He couldn’t have done much. The Hivemind is not a female id or ego- it does not do the defensive crouch. Too arrogant and un-self-aware.
Gotta read this;
http://racehist.blogspot.com.au/2013/06/the-kill-whitey-experiment-and-morally.html#more
[CH: This study is interesting in that it shows the possibility of racism existing intra-racially. that is, liberal whites are racist against what they perceive to be conservative whites.]
Libs are anti-white… meh… water is wet, sky is blue… no film at 11:00pm.
Of course this is obvious to red pill takers, but here is a scientific study proving it. It is, of course, a “hatefact” so it will never be spoken of in polite society. Anyone who ever publicly agrees with the study, and especially the authors, will have their careers ruined just like Richwine if they ever get involved in anything big and important – like Heritage publishing a study that the powers-that-be’s immigration bill will add 9 trillion to the national debt.
But we can tweak our liberal friends with it. What, are you anti-science? Like those knuckle-dragging, evolution-denying, god-believing evangelists?
Let me tell you about my knuckles.
Have you heard of the latest bit of insanity the Internet’s cooked up? Transethnicism? It’s entirely possible liberal whites should really be classified as transblack.
I would agree in the case of wiggers like Eminem, but I’m not so sure that’s the case with most leftoid whites. I suspect it’s more sort of in-club and being a libtard is the card for admission thereto. They’d see genocide of reactionary whites as eugenics and not genocide at all.
That’s the key to liberalism. It’s their interpretation of the world. They are flawed at the neuronal level. A mental disease…
I say it partially with sarcasm. But in all seriousness, these people really do identify more with the Oppressed Minority than they do with those of their own skin color. It’s an almost pathological hatred and denial of what they were born as. IDK. I just think it’s hilarious some lib decided to cook up a cis/trans-ethnic binary in the first place, and that it applies so well to their own idiotic behavior.
I don’t even pretend to understand all of the different gender labels anymore. I’m telling ya, a hard paddle on a soft ass will cure liberalism in a young age.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2335728/Tulisa-Contostavlos-arrested-claims-fixed-800-cocaine-deal-sting-operation.html?ICO=most_read_module
never heard of it, had to google it,
… … …
Transethnicism
Definition
Transethnicism is a term used to describe a growing subculture of individuals that identify as being part of another ethnic background, though they do not share the same genetic makeup or cultural upbringing at that culture or tribe.
… … …
what is scary is that it is a growing problem.
More and more white liberals are losing their minds
and since liberals are now the establishment, the crazies run the asylum
and they brainwash everyone into believing such crazy things as Transethnicism are not a mental disease
I find this depressing…
No way…Most liberal European Americans are more along the lines of “white man’s burden” types.
I feel sorry for others who get fooled by that.
[CH: This study is interesting in that it shows the possibility of racism existing intra-racially. that is, liberal whites are racist against what they perceive to be conservative whites.]
The racism need not even be considered to be intra-racial. If you accept the leftists argument that race is a social construct*, then leftists/swpls/elites/marxists can essentially be constructed or categorized as their own race, thus making their biases against whites actual racism.
*I personally think the word race has different meanings depending on the context it is used. In some instances it means continental population groups, in others a distinct endogamous group based on kinship/genetic relationship (i.e. the phrase, “a race of kings” used to refer to European royalty hundreds of years ago.), and in other contexts race is used as a synonym for tribe.
One thing that’s rather paradoxical about this situation (and not just this, but all equalist propaganda) is the role of simultaneous victim and accuser. It is indeed the strong position to make accusations of others, but whenever that’s done today, it’s always some woman or minority claiming to be victimized by some wicked white male — yet claiming to be a victim is eminently NOT the strong position. Do any of y’all have more insight to give on this?
[CH: Are they claiming to be victims, or benefactors of victims? The latter is definitely a strong position when left unchallenged.]
The insight that can be read in the following pages is called ‘ressentiment.’
http://www.inp.uw.edu.pl/mdsie/Political_Thought/GeneologyofMorals.pdf
They do whatever they need to do to justify their focus of hatred at any given moment. Indignation, victimization, just tools to push their agenda.
CH: sorry, wrong. It’s not about being the benefactor, at least, not for everybody. It really is about being the victim. Not only is it the ultimate moral authority, but it gives you a “unique voice” and “strength” and “bravery”. It makes all your insignificant little successes into massive victories because of “overcoming”, and excuses all your faults as being the result of the RichWhiteMale’s conniving and not of your own making. Being a victim doesn’t lower you, it ELEVATES you and your otherwise pathetic existence. It absolves you of all responsibility.
It’s all about the narrative, not about some kind of objective reality. Just like most women have no idea what it’s like to be actually raped, most Westerners have no idea what it’s like to suffer hate at another person’s hands.
To the kids in my generation, there is NOTHING more powerful today than being a victim of something, somebody, somewhere.
The problems fat people have (and criminals, too) was noticed thousands of years ago: lack of the Four Cardinal Virtues.
In other news, stayed tuned in to the comments below as the Butthurt Hordes of Those Who Have Been Terrorized by Matt King try to employ above said tactics into their ranting/healing sessions.
Matt is my personal hero because he has a spouse who supports him while he writes dissertation volumes of posts on ch. And ch is all I know about. There must be more. One day when I get it right, this is what I want to do.
Feministx, I challenge you to a medieval spike shield duel.
Can you make that into an essay post?
Gladly….catches your attention?
“Gladly”?!?
Beta much?
You have no idea.
Oh come on. I don’t like how guys on this site wait with baited breath for their chance to pick on someone because he was actually polite to a girl.
I mean, I asked him for an essay post and he said gladly and gave me a four word response. That’s not really that beta anyway, but it was enough for dudes to be like “man up beta. You’re not being jerk enough!”
That wasn’t (ahem) bated breath… that was herring…
which I suppose could serve as bait. llzozozlzllzoozlzll
but you can still be nice to me.
A spelling mistake I can let go by…
A malapropped phrase, however…
Sorta/kinda like how people often say “for all intents and purposes”.
Admit it, woman! :p
All intents and purposes is wrong? I can’t bare it.
I can’t bare it.
That’s b.s… I’m pretty sure you’ve done that many a time.
Is Kate the only broad around here who can cop to a clever reference or make a decent pun?
Sheesh.
FemX
I don’t always understand what you are trying to say, but I like the way you do what you do kiddo.
Thanks. My stream of consciousness does not always come out making sense.
Left handed?
Not me. Leftiness is recessive in me.
Makes sense. I’m left handed and I get jumbled also.
You’re ovulating again, right?
Im in early post ovulation.
We’re tracking this closely for our files.
> “Im in early post ovulation.”
Yet another opportunity – to welcome a new soul into this world – lost forever.
Them ovaries ain’t getting any younger.
Yabbut still no stretch marks!
It’s the effects of her past abortions that have me most concerned, though.
Has she ever confessed to that?
Or are you just guessing.
Don’t worry… she and her boyfriendboyfriendboyfriend are working on it. But his sperm count prolly ain’t what it used to be.
Matt is my personal hero because he has a spouse who supports him while he writes dissertation volumes of posts on ch
Yes, and two of my supporting spouses are called “passive income” and “asset ownership.” It’s good to be your own boss. Try hanging out with men one day.
Now, to be clear, are you applying to be one of my concubines or one of my breeders?
Sweet neg, tho. Ur purple pussy rox!
Matthew King,
A few months ago you wrote a detailed response to one of my comments, and had some follow up comments to my replies. You gave me some suggestions. Subtle commands. I took them. Without going into much detail, I would like to thank you for what may have seemed like an insignificant commentary on your part.
Doubtful you recall, but you suggested I find a ‘program’. Certainly, it was time I give up some destructive tendencies I’d absorbed and nurtured over the years.
Still what you called a ‘berserker’ [ – considering how this afternoon went…], my purpose, intentions, and drive have significantly shifted for the better. The evidence being apparent in the results.
——-
[Looks like I wrote an essay.]
For anyone else reading this, I’ll just say that if you work on yourself, others are bound to notice. Taking a Machiavellian or a newly-saved by Christ route matters little in relation to what changes others perceive have taken place. Physical change being most notable, it’s highly recommended one exercises and strives for a certain physical excellence.
How I know Game (and blogs like this are legit & commentators like Mr. King are solid) works without a doubt: I was on top of a mountain for four months, 67 miles away from society, living on a ranch with a select few men. In those four months I visited society three times with the option of staying the night before returning in the morning to the mountain. After not speaking with a certain female for 2 months, I contacted her on my first day down. I kept our interaction brief and adhered to what Game laws I’d recalled applied. But beyond actively being aware of myself, what I was saying, and what I was doing, it came naturally. It felt good. I left her with the idea that it was a pleasure to see her seeing me, and I hoped she was happy. Implying I wouldn’t be seeing her again, I left.
Two weeks later I took another day to go down the mountain. She was aware ahead of time, and planned for me to see her. She drove to pick me up, and after voicing how she didn’t want to be hurt and other such protestations, she drove me to 711 to buy condoms, because “gawd, I just want to fuck you,” she said.
Two weeks following that evening spent in bed, she planned for me to spend the night at her house. She cancelled a family event so she could have the house to herself, and (not being religious) claimed she prayed God would let me spend the night, because she just wanted to be able to sleep next to me. A 26 year old HB9 praying for a 24 year old dude to be with her. Spiritual Game. Watch out.
Two weeks after that I could have seen her again, rather I chose to continue working on myself atop the mountain. Physically, spiritually, mentally, etc…
Now that I’m back, she is more willing than ever to, in her words, just “follow my lead” and “go where I go” even though I’m “such an asshole”.
So re-cap: in 4 months, with three 24 hour windows of opportunity to get my dick wet, I did so effortlessly. What still baffles me is how simple most of this is. How apparent it becomes.
What it all comes down to is really becoming aware of oneself, what one wants in the moment, and what one is NOT willing to put up with. In my case, at least. Being assertive is key, but doing so correctly, tacit & with tact. Hope this makes sense. This is the first thing I’ve typed in four months too.
Anyone who can, take a vacation from reality and find yourself. Work with nature, spend time with guys, get dirty, get swol, have fun. It’s worth it. Now I’m reintegrating myself into society. I’m finding being sober, healthy, & disciplined far outweighs the benefits of what lifestyle I was leading previously.
——–
– blackbird.young
I was on top of a mountain for four months, 67 miles away from society, living on a ranch with a select few men. In those four months I visited society three times with the option of staying the night before returning in the morning to the mountain. After not speaking with a certain female for 2 months, I contacted her on my first day down.
When Zarathustra was thirty years old, he left his home and the lake of his home, and went into the mountains. There he enjoyed his spirit and solitude, and for ten years did not weary of it. But at last his heart changed,—and rising one morning with the rosy dawn, he went before the sun, and spake thus unto it:
Thou great star! What would be thy happiness if thou hadst not those for whom thou shinest!
For ten years hast thou climbed hither unto my cave: thou wouldst have wearied of thy light and of the journey, had it not been for me, mine eagle, and my serpent.
But we awaited thee every morning, took from thee thine overflow and blessed thee for it.
Lo! I am weary of my wisdom, like the bee that hath gathered too much honey; I need hands outstretched to take it.
I would fain bestow and distribute, until the wise have once more become joyous in their folly, and the poor happy in their riches.
Therefore must I descend into the deep. …
Like thee must I GO DOWN, as men say, to whom I shall descend. …
Bless the cup that is about to overflow, that the water may flow golden out of it, and carry everywhere the reflection of thy bliss!
Lo! This cup is again going to empty itself, and Zarathustra is again going to be a man.
Thus began Zarathustra’s down-going.
– Thus Spake Zarathustra, Prologue, 1
Nice story. Sober, healthy, and disciplined is the way to go. Stick with it.
This is what I’m talking about.
The next person that badmouths King’s contributions here gets my size 12 Carolina so far up their wazoo, they’ll be tasting leather for a month.
Always count on Dregs for crudity, and unfocused keyboard intimidation; while hilariously maintaining he is superior spiritually.
‘Though my sins be great,
And my rewards be few,
At least I keep it in my pants in public… unlike you.
You fairy.
+1. With the exception of CH, MK’s posts have had the biggest influence on my philosophy in the last year or so – and inspire me to read and think deeper.
Not that anyone here wants to hear it, but I’ve also had my eyes opened up to the wisdom of Christianity, something that I – relatively recently – would have considered as likely as being enlightened by feminism.
Here, of all places. Crazy.
“Yes, and two of my supporting spouses are called “passive income” and “asset ownership.” It’s good to be your own boss. Try hanging out with men one day.”
Thank you for this. I do end up hanging out with new men on dates from time to time in my life. I will remember to add passive income to my list of code words for unemployed (self employed consultant, working on own start up, running own business out of apartment).
And if only it could be as purpose as your prose. See! Agree, amplify and script flipping all together. Baby, I got the game! Weeeee!
But serio, I think you are the best commenter though I don’t even have time to read 50% of your comments.
damnit! purple as your prose! Need to re-read for spelling errors.
The responses come across as a bit try hard. Trying to game a chick who well and truly hates your guts is pointless. Likewise, the media was going to pour on with its hate regardless of how he tried to reframe this kind of thing.
“Trying to game a chick who well and truly hates your guts is pointless”
Are you mad? This is one of my favorite past-times.
Does it ever work or are you just trolling (her not CH)?
Mostly trolling, though sometimes I’m able to turn her around.
What can I say, its fun to troll.
Read Richard the Third. Some guy named Shakespeare wrote it.
Well, at least he would have had the satisfaction of not bending over, and enjoying the screeching at their shock that he didn’t bend over.
Much like the satisfaction derived by several of us here at the chateau. llozlzlzlzozozlzlzlzl
zlzozozozoozoz
now dat everyoenez is saying
lzozoozozozozoz
it is timez for a lecturez on da proper
splleinggsz, usedz, an dprocncuccinzioznatoonz of lzozozozozoz
whihc may be speleledd
zlzozozozzlozz
orlzozozozozozozozoz
or zlozozozozozzzzloz
or zlzoozolzzoz
oro zlzozozlozzlozoz
or zlzozlozzlozlzoz
or lzozolzozozozozozo
or lzozlozozozozo
or zlzozllzlzozlzozo
or lzozozomglzozozozozo
or zlozozozozoz
oroz lzozlzozozoznbrur7tzhtex
zlzozoz
or lzozozozbutehxtxtelzozozzoz
or zlozoz omgz lzoz butzhtecuculaozolzzolzozoz
por zlozozozozoz
but never, never as
llozlzlzlzozozlzlzlzl!!
WTF R U THINZGZKZ??? WHERE DA HELL IS YOUR UP FRONT “Z” AT DA BEGINHNZGZ!! BLASPEMEIEZZLzozlzozlzo
lzozlozzlzozlozz
Nitpicker. lzolozlzozozozoz
Duly noted.
lozozlzlzozozlzlzlzozozlzlzlzzllool
I’d rather game a chick that hates me than one who is indifferent.
That’s the thing…having a chick utterly hates your guts means she cares enough to have strong emotions about you. Which basically means she’s attracted after some careful tweaking here and there.
“In doing so, he enables fat people to stay fat and to blame society for their problems, and to, like the Obesity Society, view the condition as unrelated to willpower.”
Just like blacks and minorities who rationalize their crimes and sleazitude using the ghetto victim mentality.
If the libtards really did love them as much as they profess, they wouldn’t be so soft on crime.
If you believe that there really are good people living in crap neighborhoods, then scourging them of the baddies, without remorse, and executing homicidists, murderers, and their accessories would actually do the good people a huge service, making day-to-day life a little bit nicer one small step at a time.
Oh, Racer, all those thug4life types are poor victims who never had a chance. We must endlessly punish the working stiff for the crime of being a decent human being to demonstrate our far superior spiritual goodness.
I’m with Hugh Hendry. Modern life is exactly what Ayn Rand was warning about.
Since prison is the new slavery, you people should be more appreciative of the young thugs. They give you the warm feeling when you read “Made in the U.S.A.” on your baubles and swag.
No, the lamentations of their women give the warm feeling.
I’m sure it does after hearing so much of the sexual agony they deliver to yours.
The tales of their men getting butthexted?
You get a warm feeling from tales of salad tossing and the like?
You want some ranch dressing with that?
Feh!
Nicole,
Prison is the new slavery? really?
White man offers them education, healthcare and jobs and so much more
But They ( a large percentage of minorities, but mostly blacks) chose a life of crime,
they chose “slavery”
It is their own fuck’n choice.
The “white” man doesn’t offer us anything. The government does. Once you dislodge your lips from its anus, you will realize that it is an unequal arrangement, and you’re just a peasant like the rest of us.
If you end up in prison, you’re actually more likely to be fingered (pardon the pun) for a slavery program because you’re statistically more docile.
Nicole doesn’t understand where tax money comes from.
It’s not her fault. She was raised by Black Militants in a docile white society.
A society so docile her kind has only been considered human for about a century.
Lulz
I do understand that you people have a long history of paying way too much tribute to “nobles” who treat you like crap and believe they can hold onto power forever and ever through the generations without actually doing much to serve their people. One of the reasons there is so much conflict in Africa is that we aren’t built to take that kind of crap from the “elite”.
No matter how dumb you may think Africans are, you can’t accuse us of being people who will just sit back and take it.
Yet with so much supposedly superior intelligence, you give chunks of your income to governments who tool you and then believe that others should be grateful that you give over your tribute towards the efforts of incorporating more docile slaves into their system.
So thank you, on behalf of all Africans, Native Americans, and aware Europeans, for nothing.
Say what you like about corruption, American tax money and hegemony abroad keeps your home in the Hasidic oasis of the Arabic desert afloat and keeps you out of a hijab beekeeper suit.
You’re welcome.
Sucker. It also keeps the bombs falling on school children on both sides.
So again, fuck you very much.
Bombardier to pilot.
Bombardier to pilot.
We have struck a nerve.
Indeed. I have a particular disdain for tools who presume imaginary elite status, but have no clue how to follow the money.
Take a note of who is missing from this little round of catfighting. Not even your butt hurt buddies are willing to pretend that the wars in the middle east are for anything but profit.
Of course it’s for profit. No one said otherwise. Why do you think Israel exists in the first place?
You can moan on and on about “elite” status, reframing everything said to you in an effort to satiate your deep need to believe in us being as weak as you, but the fact remains that American money keeps you safe at night, taxes I’ve been paying since I was 16.
You’re welcome.
Patty, do you think no Africans pay taxes? Why should I be more thankful to you for fueling the machine than I am to anyone else?
And what part of bombs falling on both sides did you fail to understand?
A bus blew up not but a short walk from where I live. I had the pleasure of smelling burnt flesh and gasoline, along with losing a few of my neighbors, and still seeing the scars on others.
I was here during the last war with idiots in Lebanon, and bombs fell a short walk in the other direction from my home.
Exactly what should I be thanking you for? That they fell on someone else’s head? That they went off on a bus that someone else was riding? A bus my kid could have been on but wasn’t that day?
Fuck you.
Those targets like Richwine or Miller need to go intern for John Lott, who has been dismantling the antigun estrogen brigade statistic by statistic for over a decade.
But having the truth on your side does not matter so much. Ben Shapiro, a yarmulke wearing 28-year-old, has got it down to a science.
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/310607-1
(It gets cooking around the 18 minute mark.)
His methodology in action:
Shh, Matt. Don’t you know that our non-shellfish-eating friends are trying to tear the fabric of civilization into tatters? That it’s all a big conspiracy that somehow ties into Tucker Max and the Fed?
Well, we all have our “good” NSE friend.
And yours is Jerry Schteinfeld, right?
He does not “let his Juw come between me and you,” as the late commenter uh used to say.
Rapetini, you are becoming too heterodox, mind yourself. You may be targeted by the self-appointed combox guards, and I will only white knight you if you get the tubes untied.
Matt
And Burt Bacharach.
zlzozozozlzlzozozlzlzlzooll
(They’re not tied. They’re scarred shut via immune response to the nickel-titanium alloy wire implants. The process is considered irreversible.)
http://www.essure.com/how-essure-works/how-essure-works
Piers didn’t get owned by Shapiro. Every time Piers gets pinned down by Shapiro he changes the question or “reframes” and puts Shapiro on the defensive, leading to Shapiro trying to justify himself. Piers also appears to be physically more intimidating, talking over Shapiro when he doesn’t like what Shapiro is say. Shapiro is also too earnest and trying to prove himself to Morgan. Shapiro comes across as the smarter but weaker male.
Shapiro’s voice has too high a pitch. He sounds nervous and he is speaking too quickly.. Had Shapiro adopted the speech and voice manners of Lee Marvin he would have come across far better.
Shaprio put up a good fight but his mistake was fighting on Morgan’s term and venue. That’s why you don’t take the Cathedral on directly, they control the environment. All Morgan had to do was suddenly bring out one of the victim’s mothers by surprise and Shapiro would have been completely neutralised.
If the gun lobby wanted a mouthpiece it needs someone with a Lee Marvin type build and manner, who has lost a kid due to crime. Also being a veteran would be good
Morgan’s Britishness should have been used against him.
The hand gun issue should of been pushed, especially using the race card.
i.e. White people die in mass shootings, blacks by handguns..don’t black people matter?
Shaprio should have let Morgan drone on and not interrupt, waiting for him to finish and not responded till the silence became awkward then say….
Shapiro, condescendingly.. “Is this an interview or am I here to listen to you talk? Because I was under the impression this was an interview.” and so on.
The Right fails dismally with psych ops.
Shaprio should have let Morgan drone on and not interrupt, waiting for him to finish and not responded till the silence became awkward then say….
“You fairy.”
Eureka! My work here is nearly done.
lulz
Shapiro is a wimp and looks like one. Someone more masculine than him is needed…say Richard Simmons or (if he was still alive) Liberace.
LOL’ed.
Seriously, though, that’s PRECISELY why a gamma like Shapiro is allowed on these shows – because it’s so easy to make him look like a fool.
If Shapiro had the stage presence of a John Wayne – or even of a Jimmy Stewart – then do you think that the MSM would give him so much as five seconds of publicity?
Hell no.
Smart, suave, worldly, debonair, charming, masculine, conservative men have ZERO chance of getting face time anywhere in the MSM.
Who ya got? Any alternative candidates, rather than dreamy checklists? Alex Jones?
The point is, if you want to fight fire with fire, you have to employ the dirty underhanded tactics of the enemy. And if you want to employ dirty underhanded tactics, seek the tribe that invented them.
Twenty mangy dogs can take down a lion. We need scrappers and guerrillas, not knights on horseback in this era of the smart bomb. Like I said, we need an Alinsky. Breitbart came closest: because at least he knew the score.
Matt
These are the “heroes” that the Cathedral’s opposition is allowed… especially when talking of access to the mainstream media.
Meh… control both sides of the chessboard… nothing new to see here.
The YouTube clip was meant as a complement to the C-SPAN clip, which I knew few would click on, and fewer would study closely. But in that presentation, he gives eight or ten excellent ways to use the left’s tactics against them.
I was going to post John Lott’s tête-à-tête with that limey cunt, but he was much worse — a million facts on his side made irrelevant by the set-up.
Obviously there are better advocates than Shapiro. He’s 28-years-old. But he has the youthful energy and the vicious disposition required to descend into an arena where the truth does not matter. We need an amoral Alinsky on the right, and now that Breitbart is dead, we go to war with the personnel we have.
The left have all the lying performance artists on their side. They can select for voice and modulation and demeanor, because they have many candidates to choose from. We have to begin from scratch: with someone who at least knows the score. I can dream about dead Lee Marvin’s gravelly voice too, but it’s go-time. Who ya got, ready to step into the lion’s den, right now?
Charleton’s dead, too.
Matt
“…into an arena where the truth doesn’t matter.”
This right here sums up the entire political sphere of the left/liberalism/feminism. Every argument/debate turns into meaningless name calling, redirections of the conversation, and semantics. Yes Shapiro jitters when he speaks and it’s too fast. Yes he looks like a kid in his dads overcoat. The fact is though, he’s showing you how to stand toe to toe with a frothing liberal, and this one comes complete with an uplifted English nose and condescending expat status.
I noticed when I saw this exchange on television how visibly angry Pierce looks. Had this been after hours in another location, fists could have been used. Calling a liberal out by mockingly using his own snark against him sets the liberal on fire as condescension smells it’s own.
Calling a liberal out by mockingly using his own snark against him sets the liberal on fire as condescension smells it’s own.
Case in point: witness the goings-on here at our beloved chateau.
“Every argument/debate turns into meaningless name calling, redirections of the conversation, and semantics.”
You yourself have used ALL THREE of these varieties of squid ink in the last several days. Be advised.
And what does the rest of the post say about using liberal tactics against them?
Be advised.
No one here is without sin, alphie boy… and be advised, you’ve copped two of my expressions in the past week alone.
You yourself have used ALL THREE of these varieties of squid ink in the last several days.
That’s the point, sweetheart.
Nah, never battle an enemy on their turf. Noone watches this show. The correct response is to not go on their show at all.
Shapiro is fighting for truth. Piers is a poser who sets traps after traps, hoping his opponent will eventually fall in one of them. The latter has NOTHING to lose. He is a sophist.
Keep in mind that Shapiro is much younger, and he is invited on the show. Piers is the boss there, no matter what you do. Sure, Shapiro speaks too fast, his body language isn’t very “alpha”, but you have to keep in mind what I just said above. Shapiro is constantly dodging traps after traps after traps, Piers is the poser, the puppet master. It is mentally exhausting to fight a sophist, it takes all your attention. If you miss one little detail, the sophist will crush you mercilessly, and from there it’s all downhill. It’s far more easier to lie than to assert a truth, far more. As a result, if you have a stance fighting for truth, you need to work 1000 times more to achieve it perfectly, and during a debate, you need to dedicate a huge amount of attention on your cognitive abilities and on the argument taking place.
The good news is: once you’ve got it down, you get people’s attention very very very easily, and you make a deep impact on them. Something the sophist can’t do.
Right.
Sumlord,
Watch this debate and give me your opinion :
I reckon Donahue wins. O’Reilly is much better than Shapiro but he’s always reacting to Donahue and not the other way around. Donahue simply seems more in control. O’Reilly shouts too much.
I hate Donahue but he wins this round.
But why Sulmlord ?
Where did O’Reilly start loosing this ?
*Slumlord*
Phil speaks slowly and clearly and doesn’t get as emotional as O’ Reilly
Phil speaks for most of the time.
Phil keeps his messages simple conveys them convincingly.
O”Reilly does fight back but is more emotional than Donahue when he replies.
Phil also rebuts O’Reilly effectively.
Now, it’s not that O’Reilly loses it at any particular point in time, rather, the overall impression is that Donahue is more in control, has more mastery of the subject and articulates his position far more clearly. More importantly Donahue keeps repeating the simple emotional message: “Would you let your kid go to Iraq.”
I’ll keep that in mind. Thank you.
Meh… I’m not sure who was winning that debate… but I was sure we would hear something of the Holocaust.
Oh now you’ve done it…
Mere statement of fact.
One needn’t be Nostradamus to have sussed that out beforehand.
I mean now they’re gonna crucify us
Naw… they know I meant it in the best way possible.
And whaddya mean “us”?
If the tribe comes after you I’m done too. You can’t have all the martyr glory.
If they know what’s good for ‘em, they’ll be more circumspect about making more martyrs.
Besides, if they want to hate me, they’re going to have to get in line.
I like this one betterer:
“… Philip L. Roth, looking at 39 studies with a 5,696,529 sample size, found the average IQ of Hispanics to be about 11 points lower than whites….”
Ain’t the truth more fascinating than…well…than ANYthing?
Those chalupa chompers MUST have been underprivileged or held down or something by white people. I’d say we go down to Mexico to sample some hispanics thst haven’t been corrupted by the White Devil, but there aren’t any Mexicans living in Mexico anymore.
I knew that just by watching them play baseball… monstrous talent, but no true head for the many of the fundamentals and strategy of the game in all-too-many cases.
Yeah, yeah, I know… NAHALT.
“I sailed one over the fence, amigo.
Don’t worry, I’ll climb over and get it.”
Then there’s the one about going to his first ball game, sitting in the cheap seats… but the gringos were all so very nice, before the game start, they sing to him:
“Jose, can you see?”
I live about an hour and twenty minutes northeast of New Orleans in a small country town on the outskirts of Baton Rouge. Traveling from my place which has a field with cows next door to Baton Rouge takes around a half an hour. You would not believe how many Mexicanos live here. How the hell did they find us?!
Isn’t “hbd chick” one of that weird jew Half Sigma’s role-playing fantasy characters? I seem to recall he used to pretend he was a hawt chick writing conservative things so he could beat off to the fanboy adulation. What a pervert!
[CH: Could be. There are a lot of smilie faces over at hbd chick, which is a little try-hard. Or, she’s just a *highly* unusual girl who likes math and emoticons.]
no, i’m not half sigma. i’ve been SEEN in real life:
http://takimag.com/article/partying_with_the_right_side_on_the_left_coast_john_derbyshire/print
i am unusual, though, in being interested in hbd and all that — although i think i’m a pretty typical girl in that i actually s*ck at math — and like emoticons! (^_^)
I once read something of possibly dubious source that showed how Western society looks to the mouth more for expression of emotions versus Asians preference for the eyes.
^_^ v_v
All girls I know hate math, or are at best indifferent to it, even if they’re good at it.
Because mathematics is based on logic… female brains aren’t ruled by logic!
zlzlzziziz
zlzozizizizi
“Stop hating”. ‘Hating on’ seems to be a peculiarly North American concept for ‘disagreeing’. If any of you get the chance, watch Ramsay’s Kitchen Nightmares USA because, overall, it seems that equalism has advanced far more in North America than in Britain or Ireland so far. Uber-alpha (no, seriously, he really IS) Gordon Ramsay visited a bakery in Arizona and, for the first time in the entire series either UK or US, walked out on a job.
The beta-provider eejit of a hubby had sunk squillions into his wacko wife’s shitty restaurant. Neither of them could take any criticism at all, in any way shape or size, from any cunt. They had no kids but the wife referred to her three “boys at home” – her cats. Was this one lucky broad??! She got all the independence of a full-time catlady while still having a beta provider to subsidise her and pander to all of her bollocks.
Enter Gordon Ramsay. Neither of them could take it, particularly PsychoMissus. She accused anyone who did not unquestioningly love her restaurant and her fucked up food of “hating on” her while what she really needed was a hefty dose of shut the fuck up and a boot up the clunge.
It’s an unbelievable amount of fun watching Gordon Ramsey’s shows with an eye for the male/female, alpha/beta dynamics. He out-alphas every other man in whatever room he’s in effortlessly, and you can almost see the wives begging him to reaffirm their hubbies’ statuses as a good provider male. Or wanting to fuck him. Also fun, the difference between the rationalizations going on with the failing owners on the basis of sex. It’s the one thing that keeps me from being convinced it’s all staged. No way can/will Hollywood reproduce or emulate those kind of behaviors in a scripted format.
I saw the Amy’s Baking Company episode. That bitch has some serious mental issues, but then, her husband’s pretty much a tool, too.
I’ve never seen Kitchen Nightmares, but I did watch him on a talk show with Sophia Vergara, and he made a total ass of himself trying to impress her, interrupting her interview, making idiotically lewd comments, etc. That stuff works given the right context, of course, but he failed to read the circumstances.
Maybe it was an off night?
A not uncommon case of a chap who’s alpha with men being a total skeezeball with women.
Good stuff, well said. Ramsay is an insufferable cuss, and yet he is sought out by millions. Same with Simon Cowell. The feminist lie of “nice = good” is slowly peeling away. So much of our social pathologies can be traced to this fundamental lie. Indeed, it will be the last enemy to be destroyed, given how even our best truthtellers still have trouble with it, calling themselves “dark” and “evil” according to the femme playbook.
But I would have gone with minge rather than clunge. Bum a fag frumya?
Matt
Chris from Dublin
If you have the privilege of not having to come to the United States for any reason, for your own sanity never set foot on this godforsaken continent.
Haha.
Trust me, I won’t.
Now now… in the British Isles, the women are even crappier.
Hell hath no fury.
Yep if man did this he’d be arrested.
lol, hurt female feelings justify theft.
actually come to think of it, hurt female feelings justify just about anything in our society.
Help a beginner out:
Quick question that’s un-related: if you’re sensing a friend zone coming on, based on maybe comments or the way she’s interacting with you, is it best to cut contact right away and return later recalibrated where you can come back stronger?
Because I feel like stewing there any longer will only keep you headed in the direction of just friends.
I miss lawn darts.
Friend zone her first. Start talking to and sleeping with other women.
thank you very much, sir, for satiating my appetite (temporarily)…
…to learn more about reframing. (~_^)
@heartiste – “Chateau Heartiste is now offering PR services to any neoreactionary PACs.”
well, somebody ought to, because lord knows they need it! =/
As Fred Reed likes to say, diversity is our strength; yes indeed.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2335716/Trial-begins-horror-assault-girl-16-gang-raped-20-men-left-dead-homecoming-dance.html#ixzz2VGmOjaFT
None of them have blue eyes, none of them look caucasian
Is all I’m going to say
Looking at all those perps’ eyes is truly a gaze into the Abyss.
Those faces are some of that diversity and contradiction Jason wants to share with your daughters and sisters, Greg.
Yes we can!
Doing the jobs whites won’t do, indeed.
Looks like a good old case of forced bukkake is enough to bring two warring groups of subhumans (blacks and Hispanics) together.
(shakes mah haid)
maybe engaging in risky behavior is a white trait?
White males do it all the time; stunt pilot, snake handler, base jumping… why should white guys have all the fun?
Nothing ventured, nothing gained.
(waits for Hasbara Brigade onslaught)
What bothers me about the fat stuff is this. If your weight isn’t something you can control, what is? What is more under your control than what you put in your mouth?
True, but…
Not that which goes into the mouth defiles a man; but that which comes out of the mouth, this defiles a man. – Matthew 15:11
And that which goes into the mouth and stays therein defiles a woman.
A moment on the lips, a lifetime on the hips. lulz
Can’t you smell it, Corvinus?
I love the smell of hummus in the morning.
I am a person of color, specifically Asian Indian, and I agree with many neoreactionary sentiments. That being said, does one have to be white to be a neoreactionary?
As long as you don’t oppose white people living in a white society built in a white country, I could care less what you do.
The popular misconception is that whites want to rule the world.
We’ve been there and done that.
Now we want to be left the hell alone.
Then go back to Europe.
Then don’t get in the way when we kick the immigrants out.
Why would someone in the Americas do that?
We can’t just pick up and leave, Nicole. If we did that millions would starve to death without their food stamps and welfare. Until our wayward stepchildren grow up and get a job, we can’t retire to the Bavarian mountains.
You wouldn’t want your fellows to starve?
Those who would starve without welfare (regardless of their ethnicity) would just leave more room and resources for those who wouldn’t.
I’m all for culling the weak.
However, the weak among Native Americans and Africans (considering most Africans somehow manage to live without welfare or foodstamps in or out of Africa) are not your problem. Your problem is that you’re in a place that had people in it before, and if you don’t like those people, and don’t want to eventually turn into those people, you should return to Europe where your physical reality is sure to stay European.
See, Nature happens whether you like it or not, and the longer you stay on the American continent, the more American you will become, or you will die.
Since it has only been a few hundred years, you still have time to keep that from happening. So just go. Since you’re so superior, use your intelligence to figure something out and go.
Africans live without welfare huh?
Lulz
You’re for culling the weak to make way for the strong?
Who are you fooling, armchair Nietzche?
You’re literally unable to keep yourself within a healthy body mass range and have a blog full of voodoo incantations and you fancy yourself my Intellectual superior.
Patty, I don’t fancy myself anything but animated dirt. You’re the one living under the illusion that you deserve anything that you yourself did not earn.
I may be fat, but I’m 42, and do more with my fat in a day that you have done in your entire life. So others call me teacher, sister, leader…I just call myself me. You can call me whatever you like. It changes nothing.
Then go back to Africa
I’m partly Native American. So you’re sitting on my porch acting like you built the house.
Nah, you got evicted from the house for squatting and rehired as cheap labor.
Why not convert to J-ism? Then you’d have the “poor-me” trifecta.
Keep dreaming, Patty. I suppose like any other prisoner, you have to do something with your time in the cage.
My bet though, is that you’ll die in that sucking on that tight brown hole of corporate constructed illusions.
Anonymous, I don’t convert to Judaism because I believe that like any other monotheistic religion, people don’t worship a truly omnipotent, omniscient, pervasive god, but a demon of ego. The Jews ironically have a name for it, and it is Beelzebub. Its specialty is seducing the masses into doing atrocious things for seemingly good reasons.
Why would I worship a limited, bite sized ego demon instead of the (speculative) Almighty who opens the way for people to at least somewhat relate to it through Nature?
I second that
Lord knows they’d be on the toilet with no paper if we just left.
“Hey white boy, get back in there and start paying taxes, please!”
And you don’t have to be, well… you know… (CH, isn’t it about time you reversed the ridiculous auto-censor on the J word) to like Levi’s Rye Bread.
No. But if you’re white and neoreactionary, you’re usually considered mentally ill.
Hector: hell no
If you have enough Neanderthal genes in you, nothing regarding the fabricated by the czarist secret police elders of Zion means very much; either way.
Hector. Hide the fact that you are SE Asian.
Cool story, bro.
Gotta admit, though… he’d make a great R. Crumb character.
This is sweet.
Richwine writes about the experience.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/348673/about-dissertation-jason-richwine
Gets defended in Boston Globe.
“Academic freedom?
Not at Harvard, where the right not to be offended fuels protest”
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2013/05/22/the-censors-and-jason-richwine/vzONhoAvMDHKqzASR9Ew9N/story.html
http://www.relax.com.sg/relax/media/1816696/Cabin_crew_reveal_ways_to_get_a_free_upgrade.html
I read that Emma West is to change her plea to Guilty. That and the above makes me think that Nietzsche was correct when he asserted that morality was merely the invention of the Nobility to justify their treatment of the servants.
If that were true, then why would we feel pangs of guilt, even when nobody saw us doing wrong?
Hell, even hounds know when they’re guilty.
In case you forgot the talking points: libera, leftoid, libtard. And Jews, niggerz, and towelheads. OK. NO, NO! Shut up with all that fairy microanalysis, we’re too smart for that here. Keepers of the special, dangerous troof.
You don’t eat shellfish, do you?
What was that movie where Brad Pitt was orthodox and he couldn’t come into your house or a jewlery store unless someone invited him in?
I think that if a real life media personality dared to take a stand against the Church of Anti-Racialism they would kill him.
How do you think an anti-social chick would react to dread game
“The essence of civilization is the orderly quest for truth, the rational perception of reality and all its facets, and the adaptation of man’s behaviour to its laws. So long as we follow the path of reason we shall not move far from the lighted circle of civilization. Its enemies invariably lie among those who, for whatever motive, deny, distort, minimize, exaggerate or poison the truth, and who falsify the process of reason. At all times civilization has its enemies, though they are constantly changing their guise and their weapons. The great defensive art is to detect and unmask them before the damage they inflict becomes fatal. “Hell,” wrote Thomas Hobbes, “is truth seen too late.” Survival is falsehood detected in time.” -Paul Johnson, Enemies of Society (1977)
Heritage, like National Review, has gone over to the dark side.
Reblogged this on oogenhand and commented:
Flip the script. It was only a tiny minority of extremist “racists” who committed the Utoya-massacre. Most “racists” are moderate. Was Pim Fortuyn just as bad as Anders Behring Breivik? Stigmatization of moderate “racists” radicalizes them.
I like the “Agree and Amplify” method. Nothing says :”I don’t take your shit tests seriously” than that method. Other methods are good but they require a lot of energy. Tried and tested fellow heartistes.
Here is a masterful reframe by a South African writer and activist for Afrikaner independence, Dan Roodt: http://praag.org/?p=4759
[…] Or maybe it’s best to employ a professional. (Did Heartiste just identify as a […]
“This is not to hate on the obese, but to call a spade a spade.”
http://i.stuff.co.nz/life-style/wellbeing/8760102/When-your-mother-says-shes-fat
Tried to sympathize. Couldn’t. If you read this article you will see the hamster blowing its wheel up! This chick is writing about her fat mother, from the eyes of a (now) fat daughter. And trying to justify it. The only alpha part of this entire article is the “energy in, energy out” grandpa. Boss. Bet that stung, hey fatties?
I married a woman who was crazy, but she gave me two sons. They have both given me grandchildren. One of them five. I am happy with another woman now. I am happy about the first one. Sorry that she smoked herself to death.
I married a woman who was crazy, but she gave me two sons. They have both given me grandchildren. One of them five. I am happy with another woman now. I am happy about the first one. Sorry that she smoked herself to death.
Did this get posted before, I can’t tell?