Where pretty lies perish.
Posted in Girls, Guy Rules, Relationships, Self-aggrandizement, Vanity on Sep 28th, 2012
A reader talks about how he trains his slut girlfriend: I have to credit the Chateau to some degree for what has happened in my relationship over the past week. A little background: We’ve been dating for about 15 months or so, it’s a pretty serious relationship and I am letting her move in with […]
Posted in Beta, Dating, Guy Rules, Relationships on Jul 31st, 2012
Beta male sexual market strategies are not always doomed to failure. They can work under certain conditions. The two primary scenarios in which the beta male strategy is workable (if not necessarily optimal) are: 1. As a “softening agent” to improve your attainability, or your “long term lover” potential, if your alpha male traits have […]
Posted in Dating, Girls, Inner Beauty, Relationships on Jun 22nd, 2012
There are many “tells” women have that, unbeknownst to them, signal to the men they are dating their worthiness as long-term investments. The tell number could very well be in the thousands, and, yes ladies, we men are attuned to all of them, in greater or lesser perspicacity, and with conscious awareness or, more often […]
Posted in Guy Rules, Love, Relationships, Self-aggrandizement, The Id Monster on Jun 7th, 2012
Beware the blessings of gratification. The relationship. The long-term relationship. The Holy Grail for some. Purgatory for others. Serene limbo for most. The relationship — aka marriage, when in its most loathsome permutation — is supposed to be the culmination of romantic transcendence. It moves lovers beyond lust into the realm of silent covalent bond. […]
Posted in Game, Girls, Guy Rules, Inner Beauty, Relationships on Jun 1st, 2012
To praise, or not to praise? “seeking truth” asks: The transition from sleeping often with women of assorted beauty and quality, over the past 8 years, to recently establishing a longer-term serious relationship with what I consider quite a valuable women is an interesting dilemma. Clearly there are long-term issues to excessively praising a woman, […]
Posted in Biomechanics is God, Relationships, The Pleasure Principle, Ugly Truths on May 31st, 2012
A reader quizzically wonders about something I asserted: I was reading the post about men’s smarts and their value. You made a comment about women not wanting a guy hotter than themselves. I understand what you meant, but wondered how far you could carry that logic. That is, women do not want a man who […]
Posted in Dating, Game, Guy Rules, Relationships on Mar 29th, 2012
Reader DiavoloBello needs advice: Not sure if the relationship game thread is still going, can somebody help? My girl talks about guys she has dated in the past too much for my taste. It’s annoying. And I’m battling beta insecurity, to be honest. She still texts a guy she used to date that she still […]
Posted in Game, Girls, Psy Ops, Relationships, Status Is King, Ugly Truths on Mar 29th, 2012
When privy to the secretive, gated world of women, you learn that the idea of relationship leverage — aka “having hand” — is as well-known and accepted among women as it is among pickup artists and naturals. Women are no innocent angels, passively idling their time like pretty mannequins until a good man sweeps them […]
Posted in Biomechanics is God, Game, Relationships, Ugly Truths on Mar 26th, 2012
Game has a reputation among ignoramuses as a player’s handbook for picking up sluts in bars and clubs, but of course these willfully stupid haters are wrong. Not only is game universally attractive to all women, like T&A on a woman is attractive to men, but game as a concept and a strategy is critical […]
Posted in Dating, Game, Relationships on Mar 20th, 2012
An often unremarked (partly because it goes against the reigning feminist narrative) structural unfairness between the sexes is the amount of effort the average man has to put into dating and relationships to keep them going, compared to the feeble efforts women usually expend on dating momentum and relationship management. The fact is that men […]
Family sizes have been shrinking all over the developed world.
The downstream psychological and societal impacts of only children are greatly under-appreciated by researchers.
For instance, fewer children means parents have less incentive to discipline or chastise those children for bad life choices. A parent is likely to fear losing the love of an only child more than would a parent fear losing the love of one of her six children.
If an only child decides to troon out, her parents might be hesitant to express much displeasure and disapproval because they don't have any other children to fill the void if that tranny-child decides to rescind her love.
Something like this dynamic, on a large societal scale, has serious implications for the shape of the culture and the willingness of parents to administer tough love. Pampered only children become vehicles for cultural degeneracy by drawing in fearful parents to sustain the system.
Butting into this conversation, I have complicated feelings about AI. It is a weapon that we absolutely must not allow the Left to monopolize. The potential to seriously undermine leftoid cultural hegemony via right-wing AI is vast.
But I also know that this is a weapon which in time will destroy us all by ushering into existence the Zero Trust Society and the Zero Employment Economy.
The former is the more likely outcome. For example, imagine AI image generation that can fool even the experts, and then imagine that tech in the hands of anti-Whites, who get to work using AI to retcon our White past with the addition of nonwhites in our photos, videos, and books. Soon, White people could become conditioned to acccept the false memory of a past America that was always majority nonwhite. A massive psy ops of that nature would effectively quell any pockets of White resistance to their racial overrun.
What AI would unleash is the institutionalization of the inability to discern reality from fantasy. People who cannot reliably know truth from fiction in media and government press releases will suffer extreme mental duress, and many will react to this funhouse mirror world by dropping out and re-grounding themselves into very small kinship circles, at the level of hamlets and rural outposts.
People in general just do not sufficiently grasp how utterly awful a zero trust society will be in practice.
Through the ballot box.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
😂😂 I had you going didn't I?
What does a Zero Trust Society look like?
It looks like Mass Surveillance and biometrics.
Colorado's White population is shrinking, and currently sits at 65% of the state total. The beaner population is exploding.
"Despite consistent increases in net migration, Colorado’s future growth is precarious. Since 2021, the increases in migration to Colorado have almost exclusively come from international migration, individuals migrating from outside of the United States directly to Colorado, rather than domestic migration, movement from other states into Colorado."
storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/3aa6968ec7a34ff8
For a while, there was domestic net migration flow into Colorado, driven by White Millennials, but that appears to have tapered off.
Politically, what is happening in CO is similar to what has happened in CA. Conservative Whites left, and liberal Whites remained behind or moved in. As nonwhites (mostly hispanics) quickly began to electorally and geographically displace the Whites, the latter responded by either leaving or becoming even more rabidly anti-racist.
This is not a surprising reaction, because it reflects an all too common Stockholm Syndrome attitude toward racial displacement:
"If I overtly express my support for the beaners, they will treat me well and the other liberal Whites won't exile me for wrongthink."
If that's what Kavanaugh wrote or implied, then he's basically saying what all of us are thinking: that too much of our national policy is being foisted on the judiciary to decide.
Which is correct, but also highlights the sheer unlikelihood of Congress legislating anything that directly benefits White America. Congress' inability to do its job is not so much the result of institutional inertia as it is the consequence of an upside-down judaized morality that prevents the passing of common sense legislation.
Who is more anti-social? The man driving the oversized pickup truck with the pissing Calvin sticker on it, or the woman screaming at you like a banshee for saying trannies should not be public school teachers?
I see anti-social people everywhere.
Over 40% of food packaged and sold in the US is kosher.
jews are 2% of the US population.
In effect, Whites are paying a jew tax on their grocery purchases that they did not want nor vote for.
Whites are paying the Jewzya.
Are the Whites or the niggers winning the World Cup?
I wonder if, at this point, the MAGA red cap does nothing but signal performative spitefulness, and that this perception of neutered rebellion encourages leftoids of either sex but mostly women to make public spectacles of themselves lashing out at MAGA hat wearing White dudes.
If White men were to, instead, brazenly occupy the public square in Hugo Boss SS aesthetics and a happy smile, it would signal intent of purpose, and some of these crazy White women might be more circumspect when confronted by their presence.
"Every woman yearns to submit, but only to he who is worthy of her submission"
