Where pretty lies perish.
Posted in Game, Girls, Guy Rules, The Pleasure Principle on Dec 16th, 2011
Alert: Intrapickup squabble! Is it true that an aspiring womanizer — or even a typical man in a billowy button-down who wants to improve his love life — must pay his dues with ugly women before he can achieve the goal of banging hotter women? The question hints at a significant fault line in current […]
Posted in Alpha, Beta, Biomechanics is God, Dating, Guy Rules, The Id Monster, Ugly Truths on Dec 6th, 2011
I was participating in a mobile conference which included question and answer periods, and I noticed an odd couple standing to my side. He was youngish and good-looking — most women would agree on his physical attractiveness — and his wife was a snout-nosed, inbred-looking, stringy-haired, big fat pig dressed in sweatshirt and ill-fitting jeans. […]
Posted in Beta, Escape, Game, Girls, Guy Rules, Self-aggrandizement on Dec 5th, 2011
A reader who wishes to remain anonymous asked: I met a 8.5 girl online (physically I’m a 6.5). She’s extremely aloof, ignores half my texts. Likely never LTR material. We’ve made out, nothing more. Her interest waxes and wanes. She planned a trip to Central America without me, leaving very soon, casually invited me. I’ve […]
Posted in Biomechanics is God, Girls, Guy Rules, Vanity on Dec 2nd, 2011
The online dating site OkCupid’s crack team of SWPLs analyzed user data and made some interesting discoveries about men’s and women’s looks and how their attractiveness, or lack thereof, affects their profile response rate. First, they posted two graphs which show how men and women rank the physical attractiveness of the opposite sex based on […]
Posted in Alpha, Biomechanics is God, Guy Rules on Nov 29th, 2011
I was at a club peering down at the dance floor from a bird’s-eye view on a second story walkway. Laser lights painted the room and I tried to avoid direct retinal shots. Whenever you see balconies and laser lights, and the floor is thumping underneath your feet, you’ll know you have entered a portal […]
Posted in Culture, Girls, Globalization, Guy Rules, Pretty Lies, Ugly Truths on Nov 22nd, 2011
It’s funny ’cause it’s true. Feminists and their suckups have been very effective at shifting cultural opinion in the direction of believing that women suffer from low self-esteem at the hands of an antagonistic patriarchy. And they have managed this propaganda feat while simultaneously trumpeting the world-changing force of grrlpower. Remarkable squaring of the circle! […]
Posted in Biomechanics is God, Game, Guy Rules, Ugly Truths on Nov 17th, 2011
A reader (a Ph.D. scientist, for those of you who yearn to believe only d-bags read about and practice game) writes: …it is a delight to understand what motivates women and how to make sense of various factors and my previous dating life. Your continuing incisive reporting has helped my understanding tremendously. He attached a […]
Posted in Guy Rules, Pretty Lies, Tool Time on Nov 7th, 2011
“Game is just learning how to supplicate to women and be a slave to women’s desires.” If enjoying the exquisite pleasure of a beautiful woman’s sex and love is supplication and enslavement, then I don’t want to be emancipated. Certain quarters of the MRA movement have a lot in common with feminists. I wonder if […]
Readers have lately been requesting information on how to handle AMOGs (“Alpha Male Other Guy”, or “Alpha Male of the Group”, as it is known in the acronymic community). They want to know how to effectively neutralize direct male competition. A worthy subject, because everywhere else in the animal kingdom, males square off to win […]
Posted in Fashion, Guy Rules, Self-aggrandizement, Vanity on Oct 14th, 2011
If you follow the conventional wisdom closely, (or just leave your apartment once in a while), you’ll come under the impression that a good sense of style is more beneficial to women than it is to men. Women are the ones who lacquer themselves in lotions potions liners and rouges, spend exhorbitant amounts of green […]
Family sizes have been shrinking all over the developed world.
The downstream psychological and societal impacts of only children are greatly under-appreciated by researchers.
For instance, fewer children means parents have less incentive to discipline or chastise those children for bad life choices. A parent is likely to fear losing the love of an only child more than would a parent fear losing the love of one of her six children.
If an only child decides to troon out, her parents might be hesitant to express much displeasure and disapproval because they don't have any other children to fill the void if that tranny-child decides to rescind her love.
Something like this dynamic, on a large societal scale, has serious implications for the shape of the culture and the willingness of parents to administer tough love. Pampered only children become vehicles for cultural degeneracy by drawing in fearful parents to sustain the system.
Butting into this conversation, I have complicated feelings about AI. It is a weapon that we absolutely must not allow the Left to monopolize. The potential to seriously undermine leftoid cultural hegemony via right-wing AI is vast.
But I also know that this is a weapon which in time will destroy us all by ushering into existence the Zero Trust Society and the Zero Employment Economy.
The former is the more likely outcome. For example, imagine AI image generation that can fool even the experts, and then imagine that tech in the hands of anti-Whites, who get to work using AI to retcon our White past with the addition of nonwhites in our photos, videos, and books. Soon, White people could become conditioned to acccept the false memory of a past America that was always majority nonwhite. A massive psy ops of that nature would effectively quell any pockets of White resistance to their racial overrun.
What AI would unleash is the institutionalization of the inability to discern reality from fantasy. People who cannot reliably know truth from fiction in media and government press releases will suffer extreme mental duress, and many will react to this funhouse mirror world by dropping out and re-grounding themselves into very small kinship circles, at the level of hamlets and rural outposts.
People in general just do not sufficiently grasp how utterly awful a zero trust society will be in practice.
Through the ballot box.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
😂😂 I had you going didn't I?
What does a Zero Trust Society look like?
It looks like Mass Surveillance and biometrics.
Colorado's White population is shrinking, and currently sits at 65% of the state total. The beaner population is exploding.
"Despite consistent increases in net migration, Colorado’s future growth is precarious. Since 2021, the increases in migration to Colorado have almost exclusively come from international migration, individuals migrating from outside of the United States directly to Colorado, rather than domestic migration, movement from other states into Colorado."
storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/3aa6968ec7a34ff8
For a while, there was domestic net migration flow into Colorado, driven by White Millennials, but that appears to have tapered off.
Politically, what is happening in CO is similar to what has happened in CA. Conservative Whites left, and liberal Whites remained behind or moved in. As nonwhites (mostly hispanics) quickly began to electorally and geographically displace the Whites, the latter responded by either leaving or becoming even more rabidly anti-racist.
This is not a surprising reaction, because it reflects an all too common Stockholm Syndrome attitude toward racial displacement:
"If I overtly express my support for the beaners, they will treat me well and the other liberal Whites won't exile me for wrongthink."
If that's what Kavanaugh wrote or implied, then he's basically saying what all of us are thinking: that too much of our national policy is being foisted on the judiciary to decide.
Which is correct, but also highlights the sheer unlikelihood of Congress legislating anything that directly benefits White America. Congress' inability to do its job is not so much the result of institutional inertia as it is the consequence of an upside-down judaized morality that prevents the passing of common sense legislation.
Who is more anti-social? The man driving the oversized pickup truck with the pissing Calvin sticker on it, or the woman screaming at you like a banshee for saying trannies should not be public school teachers?
I see anti-social people everywhere.
Over 40% of food packaged and sold in the US is kosher.
jews are 2% of the US population.
In effect, Whites are paying a jew tax on their grocery purchases that they did not want nor vote for.
Whites are paying the Jewzya.
Are the Whites or the niggers winning the World Cup?
I wonder if, at this point, the MAGA red cap does nothing but signal performative spitefulness, and that this perception of neutered rebellion encourages leftoids of either sex but mostly women to make public spectacles of themselves lashing out at MAGA hat wearing White dudes.
If White men were to, instead, brazenly occupy the public square in Hugo Boss SS aesthetics and a happy smile, it would signal intent of purpose, and some of these crazy White women might be more circumspect when confronted by their presence.
"Every woman yearns to submit, but only to he who is worthy of her submission"
