Later…
It’s funny cuz it’s tragic.
Marriage, And Divorce, In The 21st Century
Oct 11th, 2018 by CH
30 Responses to “Marriage, And Divorce, In The 21st Century”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman fined her $5,000, describing the case as a situation where an otherwise good person, upset by immigration policies in this country, made a bad decision in the moment.
It's a jew. Again.
-
Like it or not, America must lose this war of aggression against Iran, for White Americans to win the war of a genuine homeland.
The weimarican empire must meet defeat after defeat, failure upon failure. Globohomo must not be allowed a single moment of self-congratulation.
It is for this reason that I fear Trump and Israel, implicitly understanding the wider implications of this war, may turn to nukes if Iran gets the upper hand.
-
Yup, 1945-1970 America was 90% White, and that period coincided with what is known as "the Great Compression". Economic policies in the wake of the New Deal established a regime of rising single-earner wages, declining inequality, increasing happiness, and a decreasing income and wealth gap between the ownership class and the labor class.
1970 was the inflection point when all that began to unravel, and then accelerate under Reaganism.
-
I avoid using the Opaque Kingdom (China) as an example of anything, but in this case it is worth exploring the idea that China runs something akin to a part-socialism, part-capitalism system, by allowing a free market private economy to flourish, but setting guardrails around it with big public works projects and rules prohibiting wealthy capitalists from having any say in Chinese politics or policymaking.
-
Yes, good comment. And the dissenters would be wise to understand that their dissent can only give them a sense of purpose and an emotional payoff if it is part of a collective order, and resisting something much larger and more permanent than itself.
Dissent in atomized chaos is just another vector of self-annihilation.
-
IMO the terms socialism, and communism, are red herrings, meant to rile up Whites still trapped in finkelthink.
Even the famed Nordic countries don't have genuine socialism. They practice welfare capitalism.
We could go a long ways to a more liveable society just by reining in the excesses of rapacious finance capitalism, but to do so would require re-homogenizing America to White supermajority status or, barring that, by breaking apart America into ethnostates.
The Systemic Shtetl doesn't want that, so it manipulates White perception by attaching loaded terms such as "socialism" to any remedies that would bring real relief to White Americans.
-
If the inequality of man is baked into the code of nature, then socialism could be viewed as an ameliorative policy agenda that reduces the kinship frictions and societal corrosiveness caused by the grotesquely skewed distribution of wealth within a purely predatory capitalist regime.
That has nothing to do with self-centeredness and everything do with fulfilling the desire to live within and as part of a functioning, pleasant, pro-social society.
Caveat: It will only work in a racially homogeneous society.
-
This is an obvious atheist attempt to reconcile the Big Bang Paradox. If the universe appeared after a pinprick of incomprehensible energy exploded everything into existence, then naturally the logic follows "where did the pinprick of energy come from?".
The atheists have never been able to satisfactorily answer this conundrum to their worldview, which is why they are clinging to cringey theories about quantum cosmology creating something from nothing.
-
Breast milk: "Hey, I'm over here. Hello?! Remember me? I used to do things besides supplement job resumes and stunlock betaboy simps."
-
If the Union is indistinguishable from a hellscape providing endless torments for Whites, it becomes a moral and survival imperative to destroy it.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
F
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] Marriage, And Divorce, In The 21st Century […]
LikeLike
These were part of article on return of kings a few months back.
http://www.returnofkings.com/172638/20-memes-that-capture-the-true-nature-of-women?awt_l=v1AQVn&awt_m=3hay.EV3KgcrK0n&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=roosh+autoresponder&utm_source=roosh+weekly+broadcast
The tinder black pills are a real eye opener for the members of the hive mind.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Seen em on /pol/ years ago. Some fantastic threads go up on that site, but are wiped before you’ve a chance to look at them.
LikeLike
Don’t earn too much money. Keep her barefoot and pregnant, and you’ll have yourself a much happier home. Disregard the ‘make millions and get a good woman’ nonsense. Make millions and you’ll more likely get a whore. A lifetime of hottie, soulless whores, leaving you empty, and possibly broke as well.
Poverty and Liberality are virtues. Tell the woman you’ll be middle class only, and not ‘upper,’ but you’ll live for others.
Proverbs 15.27
https://cnb.cx/2OkX0An
LikeLiked by 1 person
Can confirm as worked in family law for a while. Poor bastards.
LikeLiked by 1 person
mod test
LikeLike
You mentioned it in a recent post, but forgot to add the part here about bitches making false accusations of domestic violence all the time to get the husband forced out of the home. It gives them a huge upper hand in family court when fighting over custody.
LikeLike
Wasn’t it colnl Kirk who marveled at the gooks’ ability to tear their children’s arms off? “the strength!”. Figures are something like 1 in 3 American women under 50 have killed their unborn babies in cold blood. In the grand scheme of things, what’s it going to matter if a man just vanishes when an ex-cunt comes looking for child support and money to buy Tyrone’s weed? Especially given that 65% of frivorces are initiated by the party who stands to gain everything.
LikeLike
Colonel Kurtz.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If I had ten divisions of those men, our troubles here would be over very quickly.
LikeLike
Kurtz realized that the locals distrusted the vaccinations and that they thought they were saving the kids’ lives by cutting off their arms (like what Brad Pitt does to the israeli chick in world war z). Kurtz admired their commitment to saving their kids. Different situation than American abortion
LikeLike
Apparently I need to rewatch Apocalypse Now, because that’s not how I interpreted that scene at all. I thought the point was that the VC cut off the arms of those children as a warning to any locals against cooperating with the Americans in any way whatsoever. “The love of those men” was for their cause, not for the children.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dickycone is right, markgm28 is wrong.
The actual dialogue by Kurtz stuck in mod; he wouldn’t have had to explain that the men weren’t “monsters” if they had cut off the arms to save the children… which weren’t their own, btw.
It was a brutal warning by the VC.
LikeLike
Had an appointed client one time. Guy was an illegal, but had been in the country 20 years. Had a good job making $80k a year, three kids, house, car, whole nine yards. Wife starts stepping out (fat white chick, natch) because he works out of town and sends the checks back. He comes home, finds out, and naturally is pissed. She calls the cops on him, files for an OP, and he gets deported. Kids are like 8, 9, and 11 at the time. Won’t get to see their father. She gets everything because she was on the title for everything because he was illegal. What wretched fucking human being that bitch is.
LikeLiked by 5 people
He had to go back
LikeLike
One thing I learned the hard way: to women there is no difference between what is right and what is legal. If the law allows for it, it is perfectly moral as far as a woman is concerned.
This is, of course, limited to laws which are written to favor them. Neutral laws are part of the patriarchy which must be smashed.
LikeLiked by 3 people
The fucker should never have been in America in the first place. He deserved worse
LikeLike
LOL THA BIOGRAPHY OF MANY TEETS READERS
LikeLike
But there is a silver lining. If the mother is not able to brain wash the kids, eventualy they will have a amazing bond with theyre father because they will see what the mother put him through. And they will take care of him when he is old. If you are a good parent your kids will always adore you. If you are not, it is dificult to forge that relationship later.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Saw this myself. At 18 the son went looking for the father. Questions. Answers. He knew. Now he has a strong bond with his father and won’t talk to his mother. Justice in the end.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have versions of those with Headhunter approved alternate endings…
LikeLike
don’t marry
LikeLike
The mental gymnastics that women exercise to excuse what I would deem evil behavior is something I could never wrap my head around until I stumbled upon this blog.
Many years ago, my older brother had three children with his now ex-wife. Great father, great provider. Worked a steady job plus extra gigs on the side to bring in extra income. Bought into a business and became the sole owner. Things were good, kids doing well in school, family vacations – the whole bit. He catches his wife in an affair, files for divorce. She goes crazy because Virginia is one of two states where infidelity voids all spousal support. She took him to court to sue for support anyway – and actually tried to make the argument that the amount of work and amount of hours he put into his business was proof that he had walked out on the marriage. Her argument was that her having an affair wasn’t really an affair because his “abandonment” was where the marriage really ended . The judge – who incidentally was a woman – gave her the most brutal verbal beat-down I’ve ever seen. She told her that she was the living embodiment of self-centeredness and had an over-inflated sense of self-importance. Found her guilty of infidelity. She had to get a job, sell the house and share custody. She also had to watch helplessly as he went on to expand his business and rake in even more.
It was divorce porn for men.
LikeLiked by 2 people
And remember, liberals are all for ending mass incarceration, except for dads like this one and his late support checks. Then it’s lock him up & throw the key away.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Any Man in politics willing to talk about this is going to garner the support of men who would normally never support him due to political alignment, and the raging hatred of women who otherwise would have supported him due to being on the correct team.
This is the most important political third rail in the West:
-We have a long history of understanding that the races are different; we know the equality talk is just politics but we go along to get along.
-We have a long history of understanding that the other religions are very different; the buddhist atheist jew celebrates Chistmas here without demanding all the men present be circumcised or dinner be meatless: we tolerate their beliefs because ultimately it doesn’t interfere with our own.
-We have a long history of understanding why sexual deviancy is dangerous to society; we really want to believe the argument about nobody’s business what goes on in the bedroom, individual liberty, everybody is good at heart your children are safe, so we let it slide.
BUT, our history of understanding women includes the platonic love of the medieval knights. We have a long history of NOT using the scold’s bridle. Our women have always spoken freely and moved about freely and been treated as the more delicate sex while retaining a measure of equality: Chauser’s women were neither saintly nor dainty and were still treated deferentially. We’ve known for a long time that women are very different, have no natural boundaries other than what we force upon them, yet we still treat them as our in-need-of-our-protection full-partners.
The pendulum swings back and forth. Right now we’re not supposed to talk about the inherent evilness of women, not because it’s not true, but because they’ve already gone too far and broaching the topic publicly will begin the return swing.
Which will start the conversation about women’s equality to men and voting in our governments. Which will end with removal of their voting rights.
Which will end with the removal of “civil rights”.
Women get it. They don’t care about the destruction of civilization, and no amount of debate is going to convince them they should. They they allow men to talk in public about this topic, they lose it all.
That last point is the important one. In a discussion about rights, the one single group in the West with the most to lose, the demographic that created and maintains the West, is not allowed to speak about how they don’t like the results.
But that pendulum will swing back. The farther it’s been pulled in one direction, the farther it’s gonna swing in the opposite.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They invented chastity belts for a reason.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Adultery/similar offences should be criminally prosecuted with mandatory public burning at the stake.
Public executions and torture are the only way to get people to be straight.
LikeLike
Legalization of public duels and wife beating is the only way to get bitches back in line. For every smiling happy family there’s a disgraceful homewrecker lurking in wait.
Talking to a man’s wife on Facebook is grounds for a killing, and probably happens shockingly often. Social media/cell phones have put the nail in the coffin of traditional relationships.
LikeLike
Wow, just too real. Bitch just lies to your face-He’s an old(black) friend from HS, he slept on the couch, nothing happened…shes a drunk, just grown kids she threw under the bus, …come home her drunk passed out Ipad open to email, sent pictures from our bathroom of herself in nitee –nice, he response ;you and me baby’ and – cucked – offers counseling, DOLT -declined, nigga dick to big to say no too I guess…
LikeLike