Later…
It’s funny cuz it’s tragic.
Marriage, And Divorce, In The 21st Century
Oct 11th, 2018 by CH
30 Responses to “Marriage, And Divorce, In The 21st Century”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
Executive Summary: The jews got nervous.
-
"Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz"
holy fuck we need to seriously remove women from the legal profession, and that goes double for jewesses.
-
A poster on here dropped a nuke in a comment section not long ago, claiming Islam of being the grooming project of jews, ostensibly created as a counter-weight to Christianity and a target (or vector) of ire to take the heat off jews.
Is there any credence to that view? Explosive, if true.
-
Triangle Nationalism
-
Liberal Whites and conservative Whites have different minds and different psychologies. Those differences are inherent to their neural architecture and not solely the product of jewish propaganda.
The evidence for this is everywhere. Perhaps one of the more interesting experiments revealed that liberals and conservatives prefer DIFFERENT GEOMETRIC SHAPES that are devoid of ideological content but symbolically represent the core dispositions of each.
Conservatives prefer triangles and liberals prefer circles.
Study 2b is a conceptual replication of Study 2a that again manipulated tightness versus looseness. Conservatism was associated significantly with preference for tightness relative to looseness, r (2072) = −0.15, p < 0.001. These results suggest that again, as predicted, conservatism relative to liberalism corresponds to an overall preference for tighter structures even when these structures are devoid of social relevance.
As we presented geometric structures of different shapes, we had also predicted that conservatives would prefer the shape of a triangle more often than liberals, and liberals would prefer the circle more often than conservatives (because it is the most “egalitarian” shape, with no dot seeming more important than any other). This prediction was confirmed, marginally: conservatives relative to liberals slightly preferred the triangle relative to the circle
-
There is political conservatism and there is temperamental conservatism.
Political conservatism is a jewish golem.
Temperamental conservatism is a psychological predisposition toward racial loyalty, sexual polarity, hierarchical efficiency (acceptance of organic inequality), order, conscientiousness, the predictability of habit, tradition as a resolution for moral or social crises, frugality, continence, love of the familiar, loss aversion, keen threat detection, parochial rather than universalist compassion, conflict avoidance, and a desire for social harmony.
Political conservatism is Talmudic.
Temperamental conservatism is Aristotelian.
The reason political conservatism and temperamental conservatism diverge so wildly in practice is that our politics has been co-opted by an alien outsider tribe and distorted by an increasingly segregated and cosmopolitan elite.
-
A lot can happen with a 1/4 alteration of the source code.
But I get your points. 109 (or more) jewish expulsions should naturally lead the inquisitive mind to ask, "why wasn't one enough?". All those expulsions, yet jews kept coming back to be a thorn in White Christendom's side.
Maybe it is a loxic co-dependent relationship?
Or maybe there have always been treacherous White elites who took the filthy shekels and disregarded the debt incurred on the wider nation?
The Torah (or Old Testament) is truly a mirror onto the jewish soul, relfecting their racial aptitude for endless victimology narratives to strengthen their tribal identification while boosting their sense of racial superiority with tales of God saving them from destruction.
Christianity -- the New Testament -- does not have that plot device as the core driving narrative. That is a significant departure from the jewish bible that anti-abrahamics overlook, and likely explains why Christianity was able to take root in honor- and duty-bound chivalric Europe.
-
"...and [men] need each other more than anything else. They need to be together."
insert pic of National Socialism rally
-
For the reason you gave, a benevolently sexist patriarchy is the only sustainable form of social organization. It prevents the loxic manifestation of what we have today: the natural solipsism of women being leveraged against the health of the wider society.
The established incentive structure to achieve a higher social shtetl score is the mechanism that relentlessly inculcates women in their victimhood and in the false belief of male privilege and systemic misogyny, which begets laws and customs that tilt the legal and cultural playing field against men.
This is how women's solipsism becomes a danger to their own society, when it is not just tuned to be unaware of men's pain and challenges, but amplified by feminist victimhood narratives to be antagonistic and spiteful toward men's pain.
A patriarchy resets the entire poisoned system to a more organic state by allowing women their personal solipsism within a legal and cultural framework that prevents their solipsism from materializing as political rancor dividing the sexes from each other.
-
Redirect to There Are Portals gab.com/groups/87435
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
F
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] Marriage, And Divorce, In The 21st Century […]
LikeLike
These were part of article on return of kings a few months back.
http://www.returnofkings.com/172638/20-memes-that-capture-the-true-nature-of-women?awt_l=v1AQVn&awt_m=3hay.EV3KgcrK0n&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=roosh+autoresponder&utm_source=roosh+weekly+broadcast
The tinder black pills are a real eye opener for the members of the hive mind.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Seen em on /pol/ years ago. Some fantastic threads go up on that site, but are wiped before you’ve a chance to look at them.
LikeLike
Don’t earn too much money. Keep her barefoot and pregnant, and you’ll have yourself a much happier home. Disregard the ‘make millions and get a good woman’ nonsense. Make millions and you’ll more likely get a whore. A lifetime of hottie, soulless whores, leaving you empty, and possibly broke as well.
Poverty and Liberality are virtues. Tell the woman you’ll be middle class only, and not ‘upper,’ but you’ll live for others.
Proverbs 15.27
https://cnb.cx/2OkX0An
LikeLiked by 1 person
Can confirm as worked in family law for a while. Poor bastards.
LikeLiked by 1 person
mod test
LikeLike
You mentioned it in a recent post, but forgot to add the part here about bitches making false accusations of domestic violence all the time to get the husband forced out of the home. It gives them a huge upper hand in family court when fighting over custody.
LikeLike
Wasn’t it colnl Kirk who marveled at the gooks’ ability to tear their children’s arms off? “the strength!”. Figures are something like 1 in 3 American women under 50 have killed their unborn babies in cold blood. In the grand scheme of things, what’s it going to matter if a man just vanishes when an ex-cunt comes looking for child support and money to buy Tyrone’s weed? Especially given that 65% of frivorces are initiated by the party who stands to gain everything.
LikeLike
Colonel Kurtz.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If I had ten divisions of those men, our troubles here would be over very quickly.
LikeLike
Kurtz realized that the locals distrusted the vaccinations and that they thought they were saving the kids’ lives by cutting off their arms (like what Brad Pitt does to the israeli chick in world war z). Kurtz admired their commitment to saving their kids. Different situation than American abortion
LikeLike
Apparently I need to rewatch Apocalypse Now, because that’s not how I interpreted that scene at all. I thought the point was that the VC cut off the arms of those children as a warning to any locals against cooperating with the Americans in any way whatsoever. “The love of those men” was for their cause, not for the children.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dickycone is right, markgm28 is wrong.
The actual dialogue by Kurtz stuck in mod; he wouldn’t have had to explain that the men weren’t “monsters” if they had cut off the arms to save the children… which weren’t their own, btw.
It was a brutal warning by the VC.
LikeLike
Had an appointed client one time. Guy was an illegal, but had been in the country 20 years. Had a good job making $80k a year, three kids, house, car, whole nine yards. Wife starts stepping out (fat white chick, natch) because he works out of town and sends the checks back. He comes home, finds out, and naturally is pissed. She calls the cops on him, files for an OP, and he gets deported. Kids are like 8, 9, and 11 at the time. Won’t get to see their father. She gets everything because she was on the title for everything because he was illegal. What wretched fucking human being that bitch is.
LikeLiked by 5 people
He had to go back
LikeLike
One thing I learned the hard way: to women there is no difference between what is right and what is legal. If the law allows for it, it is perfectly moral as far as a woman is concerned.
This is, of course, limited to laws which are written to favor them. Neutral laws are part of the patriarchy which must be smashed.
LikeLiked by 3 people
The fucker should never have been in America in the first place. He deserved worse
LikeLike
LOL THA BIOGRAPHY OF MANY TEETS READERS
LikeLike
But there is a silver lining. If the mother is not able to brain wash the kids, eventualy they will have a amazing bond with theyre father because they will see what the mother put him through. And they will take care of him when he is old. If you are a good parent your kids will always adore you. If you are not, it is dificult to forge that relationship later.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Saw this myself. At 18 the son went looking for the father. Questions. Answers. He knew. Now he has a strong bond with his father and won’t talk to his mother. Justice in the end.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have versions of those with Headhunter approved alternate endings…
LikeLike
don’t marry
LikeLike
The mental gymnastics that women exercise to excuse what I would deem evil behavior is something I could never wrap my head around until I stumbled upon this blog.
Many years ago, my older brother had three children with his now ex-wife. Great father, great provider. Worked a steady job plus extra gigs on the side to bring in extra income. Bought into a business and became the sole owner. Things were good, kids doing well in school, family vacations – the whole bit. He catches his wife in an affair, files for divorce. She goes crazy because Virginia is one of two states where infidelity voids all spousal support. She took him to court to sue for support anyway – and actually tried to make the argument that the amount of work and amount of hours he put into his business was proof that he had walked out on the marriage. Her argument was that her having an affair wasn’t really an affair because his “abandonment” was where the marriage really ended . The judge – who incidentally was a woman – gave her the most brutal verbal beat-down I’ve ever seen. She told her that she was the living embodiment of self-centeredness and had an over-inflated sense of self-importance. Found her guilty of infidelity. She had to get a job, sell the house and share custody. She also had to watch helplessly as he went on to expand his business and rake in even more.
It was divorce porn for men.
LikeLiked by 2 people
And remember, liberals are all for ending mass incarceration, except for dads like this one and his late support checks. Then it’s lock him up & throw the key away.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Any Man in politics willing to talk about this is going to garner the support of men who would normally never support him due to political alignment, and the raging hatred of women who otherwise would have supported him due to being on the correct team.
This is the most important political third rail in the West:
-We have a long history of understanding that the races are different; we know the equality talk is just politics but we go along to get along.
-We have a long history of understanding that the other religions are very different; the buddhist atheist jew celebrates Chistmas here without demanding all the men present be circumcised or dinner be meatless: we tolerate their beliefs because ultimately it doesn’t interfere with our own.
-We have a long history of understanding why sexual deviancy is dangerous to society; we really want to believe the argument about nobody’s business what goes on in the bedroom, individual liberty, everybody is good at heart your children are safe, so we let it slide.
BUT, our history of understanding women includes the platonic love of the medieval knights. We have a long history of NOT using the scold’s bridle. Our women have always spoken freely and moved about freely and been treated as the more delicate sex while retaining a measure of equality: Chauser’s women were neither saintly nor dainty and were still treated deferentially. We’ve known for a long time that women are very different, have no natural boundaries other than what we force upon them, yet we still treat them as our in-need-of-our-protection full-partners.
The pendulum swings back and forth. Right now we’re not supposed to talk about the inherent evilness of women, not because it’s not true, but because they’ve already gone too far and broaching the topic publicly will begin the return swing.
Which will start the conversation about women’s equality to men and voting in our governments. Which will end with removal of their voting rights.
Which will end with the removal of “civil rights”.
Women get it. They don’t care about the destruction of civilization, and no amount of debate is going to convince them they should. They they allow men to talk in public about this topic, they lose it all.
That last point is the important one. In a discussion about rights, the one single group in the West with the most to lose, the demographic that created and maintains the West, is not allowed to speak about how they don’t like the results.
But that pendulum will swing back. The farther it’s been pulled in one direction, the farther it’s gonna swing in the opposite.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They invented chastity belts for a reason.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Adultery/similar offences should be criminally prosecuted with mandatory public burning at the stake.
Public executions and torture are the only way to get people to be straight.
LikeLike
Legalization of public duels and wife beating is the only way to get bitches back in line. For every smiling happy family there’s a disgraceful homewrecker lurking in wait.
Talking to a man’s wife on Facebook is grounds for a killing, and probably happens shockingly often. Social media/cell phones have put the nail in the coffin of traditional relationships.
LikeLike
Wow, just too real. Bitch just lies to your face-He’s an old(black) friend from HS, he slept on the couch, nothing happened…shes a drunk, just grown kids she threw under the bus, …come home her drunk passed out Ipad open to email, sent pictures from our bathroom of herself in nitee –nice, he response ;you and me baby’ and – cucked – offers counseling, DOLT -declined, nigga dick to big to say no too I guess…
LikeLike