The latest shitlib outrage du jour is about Cambridge Analytica and their work unwittingly helping LITERALLY HITLER DRUMPPHPHPH win in 2016 through totally legal purchased access to data-mined Faceborg info for user sentiment. Suddenly, shitlibs have noticed that monopolistic social media companies have too much privacy-violating control of our personal details now that those Big Brother-esque companies and their willingness to sell user data have been exploited by Trump campaign hires instead of the Gay Mulatto campaign.
TJP recaps a surprisingly good National Cuckview article about the Left’s strange new respect for the Social Media Menace,
The moral panic over social media and the ‘misuse’ of information is ONLY about suppressing right-wing speech and taking away the tools of mass communication from people on the right.
That’s all it’s about and that’s all it’s ever been about. The Obama campaign quite literally wrote the book on social media manipulation and massive data harvesting. Nobody in the press or Silicon Valley cared, because he won.
Now that Trump won based on (largely organic) social media success, our democracy has suddenly been ‘corrupted’ by a ‘war’ of ideas and information that manipulates people into voting the wrong way.
The left had a monopoly on broadcast media for decades. They got to decide who was legitimate and who wasn’t. Then the internet came along and gave THE PEOPLE a voice — and surprise, it’s not working out so well for the left.
All these current social media recriminations are about is reestablishing the old order. Instead of the big-three broadcast networks where liberals decide what voices are heard, we’re headed into the big-three social media networks where, again, liberals decide what voices are heard.
Simply breaking up the big tech monopoly isn’t going to fix this — we need legislation binding tech monopolies to the Constitution. It’s the ONLY way we’re going to escape censorship.
Shitlibs are getting worked up over what are essentially targeted political ads because their side didn’t get to benefit from it this time. It’s a grab at maintaining their total control of the informational vertical and horizontal.
Countenance Blog writes,
I’m so old that I remember when the Democrat-left-media just LOVED the political data game.
Like, five years ago.
Exactly. I can recall the fawning articles delving into Gay Mulatto’s “big data” gurus and super savvy datanauts. It’s like the history-washing shitlib Left thinks no one remembers anything more than five minutes ago. Trump came along and his team basically co-opted lib battlefield tactics, and OUTMANEUVERED libs on their own turf! That’s gotta burn, so libs are in full hysteria mode trying to pull the wool over everyone’s eyes long enough to build a Fake Impeachment case against Trump. Russiahoax isn’t working, so it’s back to the well with Cambridge Analytica, and maybe Stormy Daniels as a last ditch effort.
The Big Four Socials — Goolag, Faceborg, Fapple, Twatter — along with the Biggest Technopoly, Scamazon, have to be broken up under existing anti-trust laws, and/or regulated as common carrier utilities. The shitlibs who run these companies have way too much power to censor and demonetize political opponents, (not to mention get employees like James Damore fired for speaking uncomfortable truths about the Diversity Racket). Big Data and the selling of personal user information to the highest bidder is an affront to a humanistic interpretation of civilization, and there really is a dire need to curb the power of the Dopamine Drippers and protect users’ privacy.
If it takes Cambridge Analytica to focus shitlib minds on the Social Media Menace, then so be it; just make sure your local indignant lib is continually reminded that regulating the socials means his tribe won’t be able to exploit them for narrative control or electoral profit any longer like they’ve been doing.
Unrelated, but too funny to wait for an appropriate post:
Damn….that picture deserved its own post.
Back to the topic of the post: (((Nate Silver))) was all but canonized as some data demigod for accurately predicting Obama’s 2012 win. But that was way too fishy for me and I’m sure it was setup that way. That is, Nate had the goods on how that election was stolen and probably just used the same model that Team GayMulatto used.
I always like calling mulattoes: mochaccinos.
LikeLike
Too complicated. Silver predicted correctly because Romney was an entirely predictable candidate who didn’t throw off polling numbers like the Orange One.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactamundo, my friend!
Well-done.
LikeLike
Time Magazine; By Michael Grunwald; Apr 2, 2009; “How Obama Is Using the Science of Change” http://faculty.missouri.edu/segerti/capstone/change.pdf
LikeLike
Wasn’t Nate Silver a journalister?
LikeLike
Many libs (real ones, not urban shitlibs) want to break up all of those companies. It’s the corporatists in both parties, but primarily the Republicans, who are all about avoiding any regulation of big business. It was the antitrust writing of arch-conservative Robert Bork that led to the last few decades of hands-off approaches to consolidation in big business. And it was Trump-appointed FCC Chair Ajit Pai, the world’s biggest catamite of big telecom, who pushed for repealing net neutrality.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well said.
LikeLike
Conservatives like to make money.
Liberals like to control minds, control populations.
LikeLike
You act as if these two parties aren’t really just one, playing two different roles herding us into oblivion. Liberals despise me at a basic level. There can no longer be any bread breaking with them. You must live in DC.
LikeLike
I agree. The outrage is strange. At issue is that Cambridge Analytica, CA, had access to personal user data via another company that harvested it previously. The objection I guess is that maybe Trump could have used the data. It sounds like Zuckerberg did not address that though, he stated that the issue was lack of user privacy. I just don’t see how anyone can complain about privacy on facebook. If you are willing to share your data with facebook, don’t complain about lack of privacy, you literally shared your personal data. And just so we are clear, Eric Schmidt, the former executive chairman to Google, owns a data mining and analytics company that aided the Hillary and Obama campaigns called the groundwork.
LikeLike
[…] Cambridge Analytica And The Left’s Strange New Respect For The Social Media Menace […]
LikeLike
The funniest thing about all of this, in my eyes, is the dogmatic beleif of the shitlib that anyone at all had their mind changed about who they were going to vote for by something they saw on Faceberg.
We all knew who we were backing from day 1, and almost nothing would have been capable of changing our minds.
LikeLike
Exactly. For some reason the liberals seem convinced people are puppets.
Perhaps this is because they sense that there isn’t a true strong groundswell of support for the bulk of their politicies? Many votes are cast for liberals because votes just get sick of the incumbent right-wing party (whether Republicans in America, Conservatives in Britain/Canada, or Five Star in Italy, whatever) and so the liberals just have to hum, tap their toes, wait . . . and then turn on the nonwhite immigration spigot again.
The liberals are well aware that 90% of whites would NEVER have approved of immigration policies in a referendum. The liberals are WELL AWARE that redistributionist policies that benefit the poor and minorities are at BEST grumblingly acquiesced to. In Canada, public health care is genuinely popular, and that was a Saskatchewan endeavor launched by an NDP politician (equivalent: hard-left progressive). BUT THAT’S IT. THAT”S ALL. The Left gives one thing, and on all other fronts it loses the war for public opinion.
This can be used. This SHOULD be used. Why isn’t it being used? Republican attempts in America to benefit their fat-cat friends WIN NO VOTES. When you, as a cuck, get Southern truck drivers, New England small bookstore owners, Arizona bartenders to vote for you THEY DON’T WANT YOU THEN TURNING AROUND AND HANDING THE ECONOMY TO THE BILLIONAIRES. And no one gives a fuck about the evangelicals. It does not help in the modern secular age, where even the “right” is largely apathetic about religion, to preach the Jeebus line. Okay? Just shut it. It loses votes.
Concentrate on ethnic identity, coopt the social government policies of the liberals that work (single-payer health care), make the military strong, keep freedom going, marginalize and eliminate the nonwhites, build the wall, allow the working class and middle class to keep their jobs . . . and you’ll do WAYYYYYYY better for our people.
LikeLike
As to the picture at the bottom: I’m a younger divorced dad. I have my Tinder/Bunble profiles set to have girls up to a couple years younger than me (early 30s). When I see one of these girls, my heart actually breaks a little. A 32-year-old woman in no relationship and looking for potential partners has a very, very small chance of ever having children. It’s a human tragedy in micro scale.
Yes, it is their fault in some respects, but woman are basically children: they don’t have the full agency of men and in fact have been abandoned just like young men have to fend for themselves without the anchor tradition, religion and real values provide. We’ve constructed a misery machine and called it the best hope for the world. Then we’re surprised when children turn to heroine, pornography, video games, suicide and the whole suite of unhealthy responses. It’s almost hard to believe that we could be at this point.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think that you indulge women too much. They do know what is right for a functional future in the cads vs. dads choice, but the temptation is too strong.
Like CH has said in the past, it comes down to having options. How many men with plenty of sexual opportunities do limit themselves to a single wife?
Other than that I agree, it is indeed a ‘misery machine’. Big winners are the real feminists, girls who for whatever reason hated the traditional family life but lack the awareness to understand that such life is bliss for many other women.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Oscar Wholly seconded, glad you posted that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A female confession.https://t.co/fi9uSmiM0E pic.twitter.com/jifL5B1nmb
— Rivelino (@alpharivelino) March 11, 2018
LikeLike
“I’m really sorry that we are so stupid, especially in HS…”
Translation: I did the entire varsity squad.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Probably – it’s a good part of the reason I got divorced: I deferred to my wife too much. But you live, learn, find the Chateau.
But I’m not unaware of the nature of women. Shortly after my divorce I went through a serious promiscuous phase and literally none of the dozen or so girls I slept with made me wait until the second date, so I know exactly how dirty and degenerate the sexual tastes of women can be.
But while women are major drivers of this shit-mess, they are also victims too. They were not put on this earth to lead, they should never be allowed near the levers of power anywhere outside of the family and to a man every person born before 1850 would agree. It’s hard to know where to start with how big our problems are – honestly a stock crash / EMP / new ice age might be our best bet. A massive population culling bringing us back to our K roots where we are successful.
LikeLike
That vid is years old, nice that it’s still going around, but kind of sad there doesn’t seem to be any more recent examples making an impact.
LikeLiked by 1 person
ther than that I agree, it is indeed a ‘misery machine’. Big winners are the real feminists, girls who for whatever reason hated the traditional family life but lack the awareness to understand that such life is bliss for many other women.
Feminists are far more malicious than you say. They are trying to wreck it for everyone because they can’t have it. They are also the biggest losers of all. The globo-homo corporate slavers are the ones who profit most.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Eaten by mod in other thread, so:
Superman: ‘Remember how for 8 years the media cranked out one puff piece after another telling us how awesome it was that the Obama and Hillary campaigns were using data mining to win elections? Well, now they’ve discovered that the Trump campaign gave data mining a passing glance, therefore we need to have Congressional hearings on whether data mining is bad.’
We heard plenty about how social media savvy Butt Nekkid’s campaign was, especially as opposed to those dinosaur Republicans.
Then along comes a septuagenarian who wakes up one morning and says “Welp, guess I’ll carry out a hostile takeover of the GOP and demolish the two entrenched kakistocrat political dynasties of our day by shitpoasting on Twatter.”
LikeLiked by 3 people
“Real estate/reality TV titan takes up politics as a hobby; wins U.S. presidency in first try”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank God nobody’s talking about food here.
LikeLike
And here I was just going to say “Hypocrites! By their fruits shall ye know them!”
LikeLike
DAMMIT
LikeLike
I like this:
LikeLiked by 4 people
Reblogged this on Lolathecur’s Blog Below are two very important entries from the “Jewish Encyclopedia”. Read them VERY CLOSELY..
LikeLike
Winning is racist.
LikeLike
https://www.seattlepi.com/local/opinion/article/Planning-ahead-is-considered-racist-1204942.php
LikeLike
One example of how liberals loved Obama’s data-mining:
(((mprcenter. org, 2013)))
“In 2008, McCain’s campaign was as social-media-deaf as Obama’s was social-media-savvy. Would the Romney campaign be able to compete in the social cyberspace? Would the Obama campaign be able to effectively harness social technologies again?
“Like JFK was the first president who really understood television, Obama is the first social media president. In 2012, Obama not only had the expertise on his team, he had an established social media machine up and running…”
In any article on the topic of Obama + Social Media, the favorite lib word is ‘savvy’. Nothing excites liberals more than getting to use a word that says flattering things about a black person’s intelligence. This excites them more than whatever feeling they get from the achievements of their 1.1 children.
“…The ability to collect and analyze data on a large scale allowed the Obama team to model behaviors and coordinate and target communications based. They could, for example, predict which types of people could be persuaded by which forms of contact and content…”
Hoist on their own petard.
The time to form an alternative Social Media platform is -now-. After the CA and troll farm incidents, expect massive censorship in the (((mainstream social media))).
LikeLike
That line about JFK understanding television is bullshit.
I have read a history/biography book about the origins of television that I picked up for two bucks at the University of Toronto bookstore when they were selling outdoors one day on College Street. It centered on NBC producer Fred Coe, who was a cuck southerner who served on bended knee the liberal interests from the beginning (or they never would have allowed him into New York).
From the beginning, Coe was one of those “theater fans” in Dixie, meaning, of course, thoroughly traitorous against the interests of his own people. Were he starting today, he would no doubt have an all-negro homo dance troupe, three feminists, and one token Jew. No white men straights.
At any rate, during the ’60 election debates, Coe and a buddy suggested focusing in hard on Nixon’s non-makeup-pancaked face. Nixon looked terrible, and Kennedy looked better — race-traitor/culture-traitor Coe “helped” make the difference clear. Because TV is a visual medium, and because emotions are paramount on it, the impression was devastating. Voters who listened to the debate on radio actually gave Nixon the clear win.
If Kennedy “did” anything, it wasn’t brilliantly understand television, it was by having the wisdom to be born prettier than Nixon.
P.S. Coe was mocked throughout his career for being a Southerner and using Southernisms such as “pappy” by the very Northern liberals he was aiding. Cthulhu always swims left.
LikeLike
Its a hugely overblown story.
Other than JFK just being more handsome, there’s nothing really wrong with the way Nixon looked on TV.
I’ve really no idea how that narrative took hold or why, but you can watch the debate yourself on YouTube. Nixon looks fine, that’s just his face:
LikeLiked by 1 person
1 monitoring social media by thinktanks and consultants in order to gear a political message isn’t new. Just the scale and how it has been used, under the Obama open-borders era, to deceive the public from the real costs of globalization and multi-culturalism. If these think tanks see the public is getting restless and aware of the problems, they could do the right thing and recommend to legislators constructive methods with which to deal with these concerns. Sure. The cynic in me thinks the opposite – the more the masses start to unite in their opposition to the globalists, the more censorship and distraction.
2 I think a lot of the messaging coming out of legacy media has the purpose of creating some element of fear and paranoia in the population, and here I am speaking of the middle and lower-class white female voting demographic. Make no mistake, this is a key group the democrats are desperate to control. Trump has to turn this around by demonstrating how this data is used to provide better policy and service.
LikeLike
It seems obvious that women will follow the lead of strong men who are attractive, preferably physically good-looking men, but ti doesn’t have to be purely based on looks. Any nucleus of an opposition that seems likely to win, will gather more and more female insipid “oh mi gosh he’s so wonderful!” votes from the femmebots, the way an iceball rolling down through a lint floor gathers useless specks that cling to it lovingly.
There is absolutely NO NEED to do what Trump did and say “I love women, I respect them and I will be their best friend.” That is a recipe for disaster. Women want to be shit upon, abused, grabbed by the hair, fucked hard and told what to do by someone who means it. I have to emphasize that the worse you treat women — including all sorts of abuse — the more grateful they are, PROVIDED YOU ARE SUFFICIENTLY SUPERIOR IN THEIR EYES AND SUITABLE FOR LONG-TERM PAIR-BREEDING. If they think you’ll be theirs, and theirs alone, you can enslave them in their opinions.
If you’re REALLY good, you can violate YOUR END of the “commitment bargain,” keep their votes (or money, or whatever the personal-sphere equivalent is) and still retain their loyalty. Whereas this would infuriate a man into rebellion, THEY’LL LOVE YOU THE MORE FOR IT. (See: they love abuse from superiors.)
*dismissive shrug of my beautiful long hair*
Any successor to Trump should double down alt-right, and treat women right. Which is to say fuck the shit out of them. And never back down. THAT’S what they love. And every election that wins will sweep up more and more of the cuntish lint onto the right side.
Then we can disenfranchise their votes once that’s accomplished. Thanks girls! Seeeeeeeeya!
LikeLike
Shitlibs are getting worked up over what are essentially targeted political ads because their side didn’t get to benefit from it this time.
There will be no political campaigns from from this point forward that doesn’t employ analytics, data mining, and social media. So basically the republicans are guilty of participating in politics.
LikeLiked by 1 person
lolz
Just imagine a year + ago somebody told you that you will have
pompeo+cudlow+the street shitting cunt + bolton as the america first dream team
is the ultimate betrayal even the word?
trump cultists let’ s hear from you
I am pleased to announce that, effective 4/9/18, @AmbJohnBolton will be my new National Security Advisor. I am very thankful for the service of General H.R. McMaster who has done an outstanding job & will always remain my friend. There will be an official contact handover on 4/9.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 22, 2018
LikeLike
Disgusting!Top US General Says American Troops Should Be Ready To Die For Israel https://t.co/OtWkeucjSQThis guy should be immediately fired. It should not be the job of the American Army to fight other country’s wars. pic.twitter.com/JnomAx1Pxw
— Ian56 (@Ian56789) March 21, 2018
LikeLike
Traveling to Israel to receive the “Guardian of Zion” award from Bar-Ilan University’s Ingeborg Rennert Center for Jerusalem Studies.
— John Bolton (@AmbJohnBolton) May 28, 2017
LikeLike
Sadly, I’m now officially off the Trump train. To nominate a snake like Bolton is unforgivable, and signals that the Yids now have full control over Trump. It was a good ride though. Expect a war soon.
LikeLike
lol gtfo. Yeah Bolton sucks. But if that makes you get off the Trump train you were never on to begin with.
LikeLike
Thats the best you got fan boy. If this is your idea of ” draining the swamp ” then you haven’t got a clue. Where’s the wall ? Why are the “dreamers” still allowed to “dream” ? Where are the mass deportations we were promised ? How about ending unnecessary wars ? Or did you forget that one to, douche bag ?
LikeLike
The #NATO alliance must have a very strong response to the poisoning of a former #Russian spy in Great Britain. I am sure that is under consideration by @POTUS and his administration.
— John Bolton (@AmbJohnBolton) March 19, 2018
LikeLike
Please read and retweet my latest op-ed in @TribLIVE on #Syria‘s North Korean chemical connection. https://t.co/VgdNPBtDJc
— John Bolton (@AmbJohnBolton) March 12, 2018
LikeLike
last one for lulz
something tells me that rose will remain unplugged for foreseeable time
Great talking to @rose_unplugged at @cpac. #CPAC2018 pic.twitter.com/k4JihMUjQG
— John Bolton (@AmbJohnBolton) February 22, 2018
LikeLike
lulz, encore du lulz, toujours du lulz
lulzton
Trump and Bolton have been discussing for weeks how he could replace McMaster. According to what a source familiar with those negotiations told me, Bolton promised Trump “he wouldn’t start any wars” if he selected him as the new national security adviser.
— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) March 22, 2018
LikeLike
To be fair, Bolton will be doing the President’s bidding.
Every time he gets counted out, he ends up winning in the end.
He seems to want to very nearly “give in” on things and then go hard in the original direction.
You definitely have a point, but the president has done way too many good things for me to get upset over this. If Bolton leads us to war I’ll be concerned.
The President is never going to tweet, “Gas the kikes, race war now!” We have to keep some perspective on the long term turning of the world. We might be old men when our efforts finally pay off.
Still, he’s moved the entire West further in the right direction than anyone else in decades. I doubt Bolton convinces him to invade Syria.
Fwiw, Q has revealed that Israel will be dealt with, it will come at the end, though.
LikeLike
– We might be old men when our efforts finally pay off. –
And what out these “payoffs” we should expect ? Do tell.
LikeLike
Cortesar:
Check this out. I ran across this ad while watching tv late at night. Apparently Israel is short on food and they are asking Americans to donate $25 for “food boxes.”
https://www.ispot.tv/ad/7pF0/ifcj-emergency-food-box-featuring-rabbi-yechiel-eckstein
LikeLike
So you fuckers control at least half the world’s money and you want mom and pop to give up some of their hard earned cash to do the job you won’t do because being charitable is for the goy….
LikeLike
And then there’s Biden going all White Knight and Trump threatening a smackdown.
LikeLike
FIVE YEAR OLD repeatedly S0D0MIZED & PH0T0GRAPHED by kindergarten classsmates http://www.wzzm13.com/article/news/local/grandville/child-sodomized-by-classmates-assaults-recorded-on-school-issued-ipads-lawsuit-claims/69-531027866
LikeLike
LikeLike
^^^This is one of the “good” schools: 79% to 80% White, outstanding ratings at Great Schools, and a 53% Female / 47% Male s3x ratio.
LikeLike
Was it black kids who raped the kid? Was the victim white? Just wondering, as the chart you posted seems to suggest otherwise.
LikeLike
We don’t need MORE spending on a military that’s inducting transgenders & sending girls into combat. https://t.co/LzR7qwHuki
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) March 23, 2018
LikeLike
so 1.6 B (Out of necessary 30) for the wall while 1.5 Trillion in 2 years for the corrupt (((military))) machine
but that is not all
here where it becomes tragifarsical
1.8 B for the border security of Lebanon, Jordan Egypt and Tunisia
Now goys what these countries have in common (in terms of borders)?
Secretary of Defense allowed to spend $1.8B on border security for Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, and Tunisia if he wants to. American tax-dollars going towards border security for foreign countries. Didn’t Trump promise he would end this?https://t.co/8zHHAzconm
— John Binder 👽 (@JxhnBinder) March 22, 2018
LikeLike
I agree with Coulter on this one. As it stands we al ready outspent both Russia and China CONBINED. Imagine sinking that much money on an army that’s being treated as a social experiment and pitting it against the misogynist Russians or the overpopulated Chinese. Superior military technology won’t count for much when we recruit based on social quotas rather than actual skills and physical fitness.
LikeLike
David Hogg exploitin’ social media to immaturely drop F-bombs:
LikeLike
Shoah’ed already.
That was fast.
LikeLike
They are pathetic.
LikeLike
Talk about tossing pussy around…badunk thsch
LikeLike
The reporter sure looks (((white)))
LikeLike
So obnoxious.
Is it proven that he is a high-school kid? He seems much older.
LikeLike
Keepvid is gone (replaced by a spam page). As a commenter pointed out, YouTube doesn’t like you saving their content offline because that interferes with the memory-holing.
LikeLike
In this case by “American” they mean white.
– Demand for American Sperm Is Skyrocketing in Brazil
Explosive growth spurred by more wealthy single women and lesbian couples turning to U.S. donors –
https://www.wsj.com/articles/in-mixed-race-brazil-sperm-imports-from-u-s-whites-are-booming-1521711000
LikeLike