Feed on
Posts
Comments

Jewish Censorship

Readers Moses exposes a tentacle of the mighty underworld octopus of Jewish censorship and consent manufacture.

OT re: censorship. I didn’t know it was this bad.

Yesterday I posted 2 comments on a story in “The Hill” about the 9th Circuit Court’s ruling striking down Trump’s temporary immigration ban.

Guess which comment was removed?

First comment:

People who voted for Trump deserved to get beaten with metal rods by masked blackshirts at Berkeley.

Second comment:

“The plaintiffs in the case, Washington and Minnesota, maintain that the order violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from favoring one religion over another.”

If that’s the case, then the Jackson-Vanik Amendment to the Trade Act of 1974 is unconstitutional as well. That amendment favored Jews from the Soviet Union for immigration to the USA. It did NOT favor people of other religions for immigration which was effective negative discrimination against other religions and positive discrimination in favor of Jews.

The second comment was simply a statement of fact and connecting the dots on consistency of Constitutional principles. Yet it was deemed verboten and removed.

The first comment expressed [sarcastic] glee at political violence against Trump supporters. Yet it was left unmolested.

Let that sink in for a minute. The Hill management cannot bear even FACTS that might adversely affect Jews or perception of Jews. Yet they condone by non-removal the cheering of political violence.

I was curious, so I checked the management of The Hill. From Wikipedia:

The paper was founded in 1994 and was published by New York businessman Jerry Finkelstein. The paper is currently owned by his son Jimmy Finkelstein, who serves as its chairman.

My takeaways:
1) Every. Single. Time.
2) If you think Skypes are not a threat to America you need to have your head examined.
3) The left hates you. They want you dead. Literally.

I know Mencius Moldbug (né Curtis Yarvin) likes to refer to this octopus of nation-state orchiectomy as “The Cathedral”, but it’s a bit more precise to call it “The Synagogue”. Or, if you’re like me and prefer an inclusive label that captures both disproportionate Jewish anti-Gentilic malignancy and numerically impressive shitlib Gentile anti-BadWhite malignancy, “The Leftoid Equalist Hivemind”.

PS The Establishment Clause applies to citizens of the United States. It doesn’t mean every Juan, Dak, and Habib in the world enjoys the same First Amendment right to plop en masse onto America’s shores. The fact that anti-White shitlibs have twisted the Judiciary to rule in favor of such a lunatic interpretation of the Establishment Clause proves just how far past the date we are for a massive and thorough house-cleaning of the courts. By force, if necessary.

161 Responses to “Jewish Censorship”

  1. Les Saunders, Protestant says:

    1. Fully agreed.
    2. It’s né for masculine.

    [CH: mercî]

    Like

  2. Captain Obvious says:

    Bill Kristol Says ‘Lazy’ White Working Class Should Be Replaced By ‘New Americans’ http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/08/bill-kristol-says-lazy-white-working-class-should-be-replaced-by-new-americans/

    Liked by 2 people

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Like

      • tomjones says:

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        KEYWORDS: Bill Kristol Sidney Blumenthal Libya weap0ns Benghazi Syria Turkey ISIS Inter-Mediate Jonathan Powell Karen Levin House of Commons John Bercow

        Like

      • Heinrich says:

        (((lets add some more))): USS Liberty, 1983 Beirut barracks bombings…

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        I’m trying to get the keyword clusters out there in the search engines to the effect that the Mossad Agent Bill Kristol was the public face of the “Arab Spring” butchering of Middle Eastern Chr!stians, that Mossad Agent Sidney Blumenthal was its private face, and that UK Mossad Agents Jonathan Powell, Karen Levin, and John Bercow helped to facilitate it all.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        The Muslim Brotherhood was installed in Egypt to butcher Coptic Chr!stians. ISIS was created [by Mossad x House of Saud] to butcher Aramaic Chr!stians and Shiite Muslims. And Bill Kristol was sent out by the Mossad to be the public face of this “Arab Spring” initiative and to bribe the White Traitors like Juan McAmnesty & Miss Lindsey Grahamnesty for their support. [Meanwhile, Sidney Blumenthal was working behind the scenes to get the weap0ns out of Bengahzi and into the hands of ISIS.]

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Just like there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between Karl Marx and Alisa “Ayn Rand” Rosenbaum, neither is there a dime’s worth of difference between “Progessive” Sidney Blumenthal and “Conservative” Bill Kristol. They are all one and the same person, and their only goal in life is THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SHKOTZIM.

        [CH: bill kristol has said things lately that make me think he is a legitimate psychopath who would love to run the streets red with goyim blood if he could get away with it (ie pin the blame on “racism”).]

        Liked by 1 person

      • Amasius says:

        (((Bill Kristol))), who looks like a demon doing his best Alexander Hamilton impression, was one of the founders along with (((Robert Kagan))) of “Project for the New American Century” (PNAC),

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

        which explicitly called for 9/11 in order to launch a bunch of wars for Israel.

        ‘The passage suggested that the transformation of American armed forces through “new technologies and operational concepts” was likely to be a long one, “absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.’

        Then hey presto! The neocohens get into power and nine months later it happens! He knows.

        Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        If you really want to get down to brass tacks, the Muslim Brotherhood was established in 632, first in Mecca and Medina, to butcher everyone who isn’t them.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. HS says:

    >I know Mencius Moldbug (née Curtis Yarvin) likes to refer to this octopus of nation-state orchiectomy as “The Cathedral”, but it’s a bit more precise to call it “The Synagogue”.

    Is Moldbug not Jewish? I’m not all that familiar with him, but I’ve read before in at least two places that he’s Jewish. This would explain his avoidance of “The Synagogue” in preference for “The Cathedral.”

    Like

  4. jackmcg says:

    Calling it the Cathedral and not the Synagogue was by design. (((Curtis Yarvin))) thought of a creative new way to blame goyim for all the evils of history while sparing the jews any responsibility. For a high IQ bunch, NRx sure is gullible.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      The chateau had a post about this awhile back, and some of us agreed that Cathedral was a glib turn of the screw… we all KNEW (((who))) was actually meant, it covered the holy-writ mentality of the naive shitlibs and useful idiots, and served as a censorship-proof term.

      Like calling feral shitskins “youths”, and such.

      Maybe (((moldbug))) had squid ink in his original intention of coining the term, but we’ve been talking about (((their))) Cathedral from day one.

      Like

    • He’s only half Jewish, and I believe it’s on the paternal side.

      He calls it the Cathedral because the blue state hydra did in fact grow out of the puritan culture of the northeast.

      I think Moldbug would agree that Jews are now the most faithful adherents of the religion of progress.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Tell Yossi Cohen that you’re getting paid too much and that you demand a salary cut.

        Like

      • Reb says:

        Which one of your parents is Jewish? You inherit all his genetics.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Only half-Jewish… and that apple barrel is only half-rotten.
        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        He calls it the Cathedral because the blue state hydra did in fact grow out of the puritan culture of the northeast.

        Let’s put this squid-ink canard to rest once and for all…

        Merely because muh Puritans were some strict Christian no-nonsense type of folks, they DIDN’T advocate race mixing, DIDN’T undermine other folks with disingenuous agitprop meant only to weaken their foes, while hypocritically practicing their own inimitable form of racist self-aggrandizement, etc., etc., etc.

        Without Jewish treachery, control of certain key areas, and using said control to undermine their hosts, nobody would be talking about (((them))) or any “Cathedral”.

        In short, try another spiel… this one closed out of town awhile ago.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        CH, get my reply out of mod or at least let us know what other words, besides the ones we already know, are causing it to trigger.

        /grrrrrrr 😡

        Like

      • Marc says:

        Puritans are well known for building large cathedrals dominating the 13th century villages over which they tower. In the northeast.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        That’s droll, baby!

        Like

      • jackmcg says:

        Except Moldbug is still full of shit on that. Jews aren’t adhering to puritan standards. They are leeching, rent-seeking and subverting. Because that’s how high functioning gypsies surive. Leech, rent-seek, subvert.

        Btw, those New England Puritans were the most solidly republican part of the country until post WWII. Not even commie FDR could turn Vermont blue. Amazing what a little Jewish influence has done since then, no?

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Actually, FTR, Puritans DESTROYED the stone cathedrals. Burned them to the ground. Smashed all of their idolatrous statues & graven images in stained glass. Then when they came to the New World, the Puritans built small unassuming meek little wooden churches on the village commons.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Oh my

        What a spirited response!

        I know it stings that a pozz coast Brahmin (and a Jewwwwwwww to boot!) has done more to deconstruct egalitarian silliness than any of you part-time polymaths/full-time nazi-autists-without-a-clue ever will.

        Yarvin matters.

        You don’t.

        And Captain, you wish Mossad gave a fuck about comment section plankton like you. I’m sure it would make all your years as a half-wit, anti-semitic racial theorist worth it.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Tell your handlers that your initiative works better when the agent assigned to it doesn’t lose his cool all the damned time. Also remind them that you deserve a paycut.

        Like

      • Wrong Side of History says:

        I was sent because deranged retard cock photoshoppers are an existential threat to Israel.

        Like

      • jackmcg says:

        Lol okay fag. Neoreactionaries are losers, Urbit sucks and will fail. Have fun at the bathhouse.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Oh my

        What a spirited response!

        Exactly what Muhammed Ali said to Larry Holmes.

        What is this “spirited response” stuff?

        Yidspeak for getting one’s azz royally kicked up one side and down the other?

        Like

      • Fred says:

        That’s correct. Eastern liberalism grew out of Calvinist utopian universalism, which essentially held the tenets of civic nationalism contra ethnic nationalism. Check out “American Nations” by Woodward for details.

        The remaining culture of historical puritanism is why the far northeast is stubbornly blue. Though the relative isolation from diversity helps them to maintain their utopian universalist mass delusion. Essentially, they’re a political version of Sweden.

        However, that calvinist philosophy is a precise mirror of the Judaic second tier philosophy for the goyim. Christianity, itself, is Judaized goyish religion; however, it ramps up in intensity as history progresses from a transitionary (from ethnic religion) universlist religion in Catholicism, to full blown Talmudic noahide universalism in later protestant versions of it. The Utopianism goes off of the rails in puritan religious philosophy, which reflects the Judaic wish for all people except for them to lose loyalty to blood.

        Like

    • Sean Fielding says:

      “For a high IQ bunch, NRx sure is gullible.”
      Gullible like a fox.

      Like

  5. jeangray07 says:

    I’m starting to understand now why the German and Polish people didn’t complain about the ash falls.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. mexicano says:

    Last week I was banned from Breitbart for a statement of fact about Jewish involvement in certain activities. The word is they are stepping up their censorship, perhaps in a desperate attempt to keep us silent

    Like

    • The Daily Caller has been outstanding. Especially in keeping a very watchful eye on (((Bill Kristol))) for the last 7 or 8 years.

      Liked by 1 person

      • jackmcg says:

        Daily Caller put Chuck Ross on a leash though. Still does good research, but I haven’t seen a word of shitlording from him since his gucci little piggy days.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        The Daily Caller is compiling a nice little database, though. Almost every time there’s been a new Skype-ish outrage in the last few months, The Daily Caller will feature it, front and center.

        Like

      • ar10308 says:

        CR’s Gucci Little Piggy was a fucking delight. True talent, that right there.

        Like

  7. Anonymous says:

    .

    Like

  8. […] Jewish Censorship […]

    Like

  9. I was wondering what Synathedral meant.

    It amazes me how intellectually curious Whites can fail to see the Jewish problem. They can contort their minds in any direction except that one.

    I was red-pilled on Jews before race and well before women. Curiosity should drive an intelligent person to investigate topics which are “off-limits”. The more forbidden they are, the more scrutiny they deserve. The JQ is the only issue I can think of—race is a close 2nd—where there is absolutely no room for discussion, and should therefore raise a giant red flag to anyone capable of independent though.

    When I was young (80s-90s) this kind of talk was only the purview of actual nazis, KKK, etc. I’d be lying if I said that I didn’t second-guess myself at the time, or wonder if I was being paranoid. But now the mask is finally starting to slip, and it’s clear to all who want to see.

    Liked by 3 people

    • > “the purview of actual nazis, KKK” ——— And to complete your intellectual journey, you must finally confess, “They were right, and I was wrong.”

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Then spend a very long time pondering the question: “What protected them from The Poz, and what made me susceptible to The Poz?”

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        And it was a prisoner who penned the 14 Words: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Lane_%28white_supremacist%29

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Have you ever asked yourself why the “judicial” system gives ch!ld m0lesters a slap on the wrist, but the prisoners in the penal institutions impose upon those same ch!ld m0lesters the penalty which the ch!ld m0lesters actually deserve – namely, execution? Why is it that the prisoners are MORE MORAL than the legislators who write the laws and the jurists who apply the laws?

        Liked by 1 person

      • “They were right, and I was wrong.”

        But I was right. My point was about the amount of courage required to hold those convictions in the face of unanimous opposition (grew up in DC) and social ostracization. I suspect most Whites in that milieu, perhaps unconsciously, realize that cost-benefit isn’t worth it and cede the issue.

        “What protected them from The Poz”

        Do you have any theories on that? Heritage Whites are just as vulnerable to (((media/entertainment))). I don’t agree that college is responsible. Most people have already made up their minds by that point. I’d guess that it’s some combination of upbringing and genetics.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        My best guess right now is that it’s genetics influencing either the Amygdala [predisposition for COMMON SENSE] or the Insula [susceptiblity to emotionalistic stimulae which overwhelm the capacity for Reason]. My point is that we all need to ask ourselves whether the Frankfurt School ever launched a successful emotionalistic assault upon us, then pinpoint that assault, analyze our particular weaknesses which they exploited, and finally swear to ourselves, “Fool us once, shame on (((you))); fool us twice, shame on us.”

        Like

      • PA says:

        And it was a prisoner who penned the 14 Words

        Prisoner Bill White has been making astute commentary on Trump and WN. He corresponds with H. Covington, who posts White’s commentary on his blog “down with jugears”

        Liked by 1 person

    • Winter says:

      The reason the question had and for most still has no room for discussion is because when people hear someone start talking about it they just see Auschwitz and don’t want to look. Who would?

      The only way is to gently and calmly point out how the rules in each white person’s country are like this while Israel’s are like that. On exactly the same issues.
      Then point at how the activists and architects of multiculturalism are J. Point them out one at a times as they pop up each time the issue pops up. Ask why they’re not leading the charge against Israel. Start talking about how if someone holds something to your lips but never drinks it themselves maybe it’s not so healthy and maybe they’re not your friend.

      It was youtube vids that helped me, mainly one about what great men of history have said about J. But I was already well on my way on waking up due to just noticing that it was always a J. I don’t know what got me looking but gently encouraging others to look at the Tim Wise, the Bill Kristol etc is all you can do.

      Like

  10. There’s a game I play. When I notice that something I’m reading or watching something antiChristian, subversive, ugly or degenerate I’ll check on who the author is. 8/10 times it’s a (((YKW)))

    Might be a good little game to suggest to neophytes who aren’t woke.

    Liked by 1 person

    • wolfie65 says:

      Here’s a few names for you:
      Arthur Schnitzler
      Oskar Kokoschka
      Egon Schiele
      Gustav Klimt
      Franz Kafka

      Like

  11. FH says:

    The ruling hung not so much on the Establishment Clause, but on issues of Due Process for certain non-citizens. While “Every Juan, Dak and Habib” is not entitled to Due Process under the Constitution, legal aliens and other non-citizen Visa holders who were erroneously included in the original EO are. That, plus the fact that the order itself was not amended/reissued to reflect that state of affairs, is at the heart of the ruling. Add to that there was no Attorney General in place at the time the EO was issued and that the Trump Administration was forced to rely on lazy [careerist]/opposed [careerist]/unqualified [careerist] attorneys who put forth a weak argument in court and an extreme left-wing Judiciary in the Ninth Circus already far enough out of their minds without Trump riling them with the idea that the order was not subject to review [possibly a rookie mistake from which he’ll surely learn], and this ruling was inevitable.

    Reissuing the order such that it does not apply to legal aliens and non-Citizen Visa holders and, while the Ninth Circus might invent some other excuse to stay it, it would be close to bulletproof before Justice Kennedy or the full Supreme Court.

    [CH: LOTB aptly destroys the counter-argument you and the 9th presented against trump’s EO here:

    https://lionoftheblogosphere.wordpress.com/2017/02/09/state-of-washington-v-trump-17-35105-9th-circuit/

    this was strictly tyrannical judicial activism by shitlib judges extending US Rights to non-citizens where they have no Constitutional Rights.]

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      More squid ink… the language of the judicial code gives the president every right to do what Trump did, even if it wasn’t squeaky clean on all forms of non-citizenry.

      Fuck that noise of shithouse lawyering… that’s the problem with this country… and why Christ Himself singled out lawyers for a stern “Beware!”

      Like

      • FH says:

        “Fuck that noise of shithouse lawyering…”

        When you send an attorney into court to defend you against a murder charge, you better damn well be sure he’s done the prep work for defending you against a murder charge as opposed to, say, defending you against an unpaid parking ticket.

        [CH: do you agree or disagree with the topic of this post: The Hill’s decision to censor a comment discussing legal precedent (whether correctly or incorrectly) and permit a comment espousing violence against political dissidents?]

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Avoidance and deflection duly noted, counselor.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      this was strictly tyrannical judicial activism by shitlib judges extending US Rights to non-citizens where they have no Constitutional Rights.

      Exactly.

      While “Every Juan, Dak and Habib” is not entitled to Due Process under the Constitution, legal aliens and other non-citizen Visa holders who were erroneously included in the original EO are.

      But this dweeb FH had to come here and say black is white… he’s either a sophomore at a third-rate law college or a rabbinical student..

      Like

    • jackmcg says:

      nice link CH, LOTB is annoying because he seems unaware of how much his jewish bias colors his perspective. But he’s also pretty damn good sometimes.

      [CH: i feel the same about him. he’s great 90% of the time, and insufferable that 10% of the time when he can’t resist the siren song of his tribe’s…unique…worldview. i stand by what i wrote on twatter: jews as a group (exceptions granted) are missing the self-reflection gene and this has been both the source of their success, and the inevitable loss of their power.]

      Liked by 1 person

      • mendo says:

        Good comments section over there. A few seem to be of the sky-is-falling variety, but most others get it.

        And those that don’t are missing what LOTB is specifically targeting. It’s in his first paragraph.

        Like

    • FH says:

      ” LOTB aptly destroys the counter-argument you and the 9th presented…”

      Not really.

      Relevant cites:

      “…the States argued that the Executive Order violates the procedural due process rights of various aliens in at least three independent ways. First, section 3(c) denies re-entry to certain lawful permanent residents and
      non-immigrant visaholders without constitutionally sufficient notice and an opportunity to respond. Second, section 3(c) prohibits certain lawful permanent residents and non-immigrant visaholders from exercising their separate and independent constitutionally protected liberty interests
      in travelling abroad and thereafter re-entering the United States…[Page 20]…The procedural protections provided by the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause are not limited to citizens. Rather, they “appl[y] to all ‘persons’ within the United States, including aliens,” regardless of “whether their presence here is lawful, unlawful…”… [Pages 20, 21]…the Government has failed to establish that lawful permanent residents have no due process rights when seeking to re-enter the United States. See id. (“[T]he returning resident alien is entitled as a matter of due process to a hearing on the charges underlying any attempt to exclude him.” (quoting Rosenberg v. Fleuti, 374 U.S. 449, 460 (1963))). Nor has the Government established that the Executive Order provides lawful permanent residents with constitutionally sufficient process to challenge their denial of re-entry. See
      id.at 35 (“[T]he courts must evaluate the particular circumstances and determine what procedures would satisfy the minimum requirements of due process on the re-entry of a permanent resident alien.”). The Government has argued that, even if lawful permanent residents have due process rights, the States’ challenge to section 3(c) based on its application to lawful permanent residents is moot because several days after the
      Executive Order was issued, White House counsel Donald F. McGahn II issued “[a]uthoritative [g]uidance” stating that sections 3(c) and 3(e) of the Executive Order do not apply to lawful permanent residents. At this point, however, we cannot rely upon the Government’s contention that the Executive Order no longer applies to lawful permanent residents. The Government has offered no authority establishing that the White House counsel is empowered to issue an amended order superseding the Executive Order…[Page 21]…”

      Judicial activism? Yes, definitely. Over-reach? Possibly. Tyranny? Not quite.

      [CH: my homeland is being flooded with third world filth by enemies of the state like these 9th circuit judges. i call that tyranny.]

      Lord Trump made a rookie mistake and relied on careerist Government attorneys who are not his people, who don’t believe in his agenda, who are lazy, overpaid and, in the case of the attorney who argued the appeal, inexperienced to fight what should have been fought by people acting under the guidance of Jeff Sessions. Waiting a few days for his confirmation would not have hurt. And, as has been pointed out, all he needs to do is issue a new EO that addresses this matter, and the States have to litigate the whole matter over again.

      [if the 5th amendment due process clause has been over-interpreted to apply to non-citizens in such a way that they can’t be barred from entering the country, then the amendment needs to be scrapped and either rewritten with american’s interests at heart or dropped altogether.]

      Like

    • FH says:

      “do you agree or disagree with the topic of this post…”

      There were several. I spoke to the one I felt was most important overall.

      [CH: that was not the most important take-home point of the post we are discussing. but i could envision a number of scenarios in which you would want to distract with obliquely relevant segues.]

      With regard to The Hill, they should be taken to task both for their censorship as well as for giving a platform to people calling for violence against those who don’t share their views.

      [i think the whole lot of these shitlib media companies should be trust-busted to kingdom come.]

      Like

      • FH says:

        “[T]hat was not the most important take-home point of the post we are discussing. but i could envision a number of scenarios in which you would want to distract with obliquely relevant segues.”

        You wished to focus on The Hill’s buffoonery; fair enough.

        For what, if anything, it’s worth, I was not attempting to distract from that by delving into the specific’s of the Ninth Circus’ decision. If I’ve done so, I apologize.

        “i think the whole lot of these shitlib media companies should be trust-busted to kingdom come.”

        I couldn’t agree more.

        Like

    • FH says:

      “But this dweeb FH had to come here and say black is white…”

      You’re seeing what you want to see, rather than what is.

      If you want to argue against Due Process for persons here legally or legal visa holders, that’s an entirely separate discussion.

      As it is, non-citizens who are here legally have certain Due Process rights that states of Washington and Minnesota argued, successfully, weren’t taken into account in the EO as issued, and that weren’t sufficiently addressed by the corrections made by WH Counsel.

      If it said anything about the supposed Due Process rights of people who are not citizens, who do not have legal residency or lawful visas, I didn’t read it in the text of that decision.

      “…he’s either a sophomore at a third-rate law college or a rabbinical student..”

      Neither.

      Like

    • Anonymous says:

      The notion that any random forum shopped trial judge (or intermediate appellate court or the US Supreme Court) can “block” the President’s executive order directing his executive employees on national security immigration matters is so laughable that any lawyer who suggests otherwise should be disbarred.

      It was you communists who created the massive fourth branch.

      Period.

      But you have gone to far.

      We will cancel this system and start over.

      #weknow

      Like

  12. ar10308 says:

    But muh Judeo-Christian values! We can all worship Judeo-Christ together!

    H/t Vox Day for coining that fantastic piece propo.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. mendo says:

    The left hates you. They want you dead. Literally.

    Why does this sound so familiar. . .

    If the world hates you, understand that it hated Me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love you as its own….If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you.

    And (((they))) literally killed Jesus, so we know that’s how (((they))) resolve their issues.

    Liked by 2 people

    • mendo says:

      Read this comment from Vox Day himself:

      Certainly. Like Jesus Christ before him, the God-Emperor comes as a sword, in this case to divide Alt-Right from wrong.

      Like

  14. IHTG says:

    The Cathedral makes more sense than the Synagogue for a number of reasons. The cultural prestige, the imposing architecture, the roots of elite academic institutions in old school Protestant Christianity.

    You want to call it “the Synagogue” as a jab against Jewish liberalism, but the places where religious Jews worship have little to do with the cultural power of liberalism. They don’t evoke it.

    Like

    • mendo says:

      ^Who’s bitch this is?

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      As if otherwise-secular-but-play-along and Reformed Jews don’t go to a “synagogue”.

      (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      Like

    • IHTG says:

      Another thing that makes “Cathedral” more appropriate is the ideological organization and networking implied by the word. Catholicism is an organized, hierarchical religion. Bishops, dioceses, led by a Pope. A dogma imposed from above. I shouldn’t have to tell you how that evokes the “liberal hivemind”.

      Like

      • mendo says:

        Sanhedrin existed before Catholicism. They were just as organized and hierarchical. Nothing’s changed. The Sanhedrin still exists.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Well bless mah soul… shoulda kept an eye out on dem Catholics all this time, eh?

        /Squids gonna shoot ink rape!

        Like

    • The Synagogue makes more sense than the Cathedral for a number of reasons. The cultural prestige, the imposing architecture, the roots of elite academic institutions in old school Judaism.

      They want to call it “the Cathedral” as a jab against Christianity, but the places where Christians worship have little to do with the cultural power of liberalism. They don’t evoke it.

      Like

    • oink says:

      Of course, cathedrals are popish invention

      It behooves a ((frontrunner)) to not attack Massa

      ditto for the blind Spot towards the biological muscle for the Synhedralist state the saxonoceltic craker-yankee alliance

      Like

    • Fred says:

      @IHTG

      You don’t understand Judaism’s core tenets.

      Like

  15. Greg Eliot says:

    Every… fucking… time… indeed.

    But cue the usual suspects with their NAJALT, (((frontrunner))) spiel.

    /Oh, LOOK OVER THERE! Puritans… the CIA… [put your distraction here] rape!

    Like

    • Look over there! It’s Globalism! Now go over there and stop it, and ignore (((us))) generous merchants!

      Like

    • oink says:

      Obviously SJALT. Even MJALT + tribal cohesion as adittional aggravation

      but “this jew that you gave me” shtick will not fly with the BigBoss upstairs, if i’m taking Franz Ferdinand’s squirting jugular take on the topic correctly

      Like

  16. Greg Eliot says:

    Jewish Censorship, aka Dynamic Silence, the brainchild of some rabbi from the sixties, if memory serves, but that’s just when the practice got an actual monicker… (((they))) have been doing it for a good while.

    Like

  17. jackmcg says:

    The only guy who might self-identify as neoreactionary that is cool is probably SOBL1, also writes under Ryan Landry.

    The rest of NRx is Jewish, or intensely weird and autistic.

    Like

  18. JenkPac Shakur says:

    Other than simply saying Jew or identifying our enemies as Jews the OTHER best overall term to use to describe the mortal enemies of whites everywhere is and always has been ZOG.

    Nothing quite captures the alien and hostile nature of the Jew quite so succinctly as that precise term.

    Individuals who try and use the friendly sounding term JOG in it’s place either are low IQ’s that “don’t get it” as to why using the original Z lettered version of the term is so important to do or they are active Jew or white shabbos goyim subversives attempting to misdirect pro whites from using the proper ZOG terminology thus removing the potency/punch/power of the thing from our collective white consciousness.

    Like

  19. JenkPac Shakur says:

    For white western civilization to even begin to recover and thrive once more the white collective “Ripley” must inevitably eject the Jewish “Alien” from our societal “Airlock”.

    Like

  20. Anonymous says:

    Yep.

    Like

  21. oink says:

    so killing off the Habsburgs, putting Eastern Europe and Russia through bolshevik hell, installing the Antipope, and sundry other did not bring paradise-on-earth?

    who’da’thunk’it?

    blame the friggin frontrunner. they are frontrunning all the way to the executioner’s ditch like the trotskytes singing L’Internationale in Solzhenitsyn’s story.

    this woman/jew/papist/commie spy that you gave me made me do it
    it went well, firsttime and everytime since. it will once again succeed spectacularly (not that frontrunners won’t take their 110th correction – but they have 70 times 7 if they repent);

    As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man —
    There are only four things certain since Social Progress began: —
    That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,
    And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;

    And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
    When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
    As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,
    The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

    Like

    • oink says:

      Massa wants some cheaper serfs. It will be bad for the US jews themselves, but what the heck, ((Billy Kristol)) will do his selling shtick! they are dumb, but not THAT dumb.

      these guys fluffed Adolf Schicklgruber Hitler (Erhard “the aryan” Milch). compared to historical figures like Yosef ben Ya’akov that sold the entirety of Israel to Pharaoh, Billi K is but a 21st century putz.
      .
      .
      .
      WSH,
      88rs are idiots but y’all have some SERIOUS house cleaning to do

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      That’s only three things… but +1 on Kipling anyway.

      Like

      • oink says:

        1) bitch > vomit
        2) sow > mire
        3) bandaged fool’s fingers wobbles back
        4) GCH return with the usual accoutrements

        (sorry 4 sperging)

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        When he said “and after that”, I looked at the GCH return as a result of the so-called brave new world beginning… sine qua non

        And since said beginning was not ipso facto, certain, well… neither then would be the return…

        … whereas the other three have always occurred, and will ALWAYS occur, new world or not.

        I can sperg too, ya know! 😉

        Like

  22. Ripp says:

    https://archive.is/uK2Di

    Get this: great fact based write up showing how NY Jew Times and Wash Post are inflatinf their internet traffic with bots from China.

    Literally undeniable given the deductive breakdown.

    We’re winning.

    Like

    • oink says:

      if true, huge for the Trumpening. although 100 journos given free helicopter rides would greatly encourage les autres.

      Like

  23. Another point I rarely see mentioned: Literature and music by (((them))) is often praised out of proportion to its actual artistic value, because its (((they))) are doing the reviewing and they favor their own. Does anyone really think Lou Reed, Bob Dylan, or Leonard Cohen warrant all the massive praise? Or Philip Roth?

    This has brought us to a place where bad is seen as good and vice-verse. It’s gotten to the point where I now see reviews as a reverse barometer, even if (((they’re))) not writing them. Because others in the field feel peer-pressured to fall into line (insert Voltaire quote here).

    It also bothers me they’re do entrenched in the publishing industry and give each other big-time book deals — so long as the books promote “transgressive” ideas. This is especially true with Young Adult fiction, where books are often advertisements to alternative lifestyles and/or Planned Parenthood. It’s all yentas doing the writing and making the deals, and it’s the brains of your kids getting warped.

    (I’m leaving out film because I despise the waste-of-time medium, but the same goes for movies as far as I can tell.)

    [CH: bob dylan sucks. so overrated, and for the reasons you give, DOBA.]

    Liked by 2 people

    • Not a Jew, but this is most clearly evident with Jimi Hendrix.

      Liked by 2 people

    • martin2 says:

      Yes Mahler’s symphonies nbr x, where x > 6, really stink. And his earlier symphonies have many dull moments. I was really amazed when I heard his seventh symphony for the first time at how bad it was.Yet he is promoted like he is the greatest symphonist since Beethoven.

      Liked by 1 person

      • hard9bf says:

        No. Mahler’s 7th is his nadir only if you’re familiar with 1 thru 6 because it’s obvious he’s spinning his wheels, rehashing and plagiarizing former glories. But 8 thru 10 strike out toward new horizons, Mahler renewing his inspiration and craft — they’re excellent symphonies. Conductors and orchestras love Mahler because his symphonies are long and complex — great orchestral showpieces.

        Mendelssohn is the only other (((composer))) of note, and he’s held in lower esteem than Chopin, Schumann, Liszt, and Wagner, all born within a couple years of (((him))).

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I like Mahler, but that’s because whenever I listen, it gives me the impression of Wagner-lite.

        The lighter fare of the 20th Century popular genres do the tribe more justice… the likes of Bacharach, and pretty much all of Broadway.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Duh, duh, and DUH!

      Many have pointed this out in the past and by now it should be obvious, ESPECIALLY with the recent crowning of Zimmerman as a Nobel Laureate, of all outlandish things. Bring up him, Singer, and Begin, as a start, when you hear a kike boast about his people’s over-representation in the Nobels.

      (((They’re))) not as smart as (((they))) make themselves out to be… shrewd opportunism and networking on steroids is not intelligence… and mutual admiration socieites, when tooting horns, sound hollow indeed.

      And funny you should mention Hendrix… that’s another King Of Overrating from the days of when the agitprop really started to take wing… the culmination of all those alleged “negro geniuses” of music, without whom there would have been no White rock and pop. Heh, as if Chuck Berry should get credit for Sgt. Pepper, Quadrophenia, and Houses of the Holy. :duckface:

      Liked by 1 person

      • anonymous says:

        But blacks do have a relative advantage in music. If any where to shine that would be one of the places it could happen.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        But blacks do have a relative advantage in music.

        That alleged relative advantage is living in White societies, or they’d still just be banging on skins with bones in they noses.

        And if your taste runs to masturbatory jazz, illiterate rap, and said jungle boogie, well… yes, they have that advantage, keep you warm.

        Three chords does not “genius” make, Bubba.

        Brian Wilson could write Sweet Little Sixteen half-asleep and stoned… Chuck Berry couldn’t come up a God Only Knows at the height of his inspiration with the advice of Bo Diddley, John Lee Hooker, and Sonny Boy Williamson in tow.

        Like

    • Lichthof says:

      Yes I’ve personally seen this working in the media industry for 5 years. A big (((movie))) comes out and the media (((reviewer))) will highlight it and blow it out of proportion. Then (((google))) or (((youtube))) will advertise it. The (((director))) is interviewed and the (((movie))) will have some universal…bad whites… racism is bad undertone.
      (((The Longest Ride))) was horrible…merging a holocaust Jewish victim story with cowboys.
      (((They embed))) themselves into ‘Judeo-Christian’ America.
      The (((tv))) asks for donations to help send poor Russian (((kids))) home to Israel.

      Serh Rogen, Adam Sandler, Ben Stiller…no talent…not funny…rich kids supported by rich families having a fun time.

      Like

      • I’ll add Mel Brooks to the list of overrated Jews. My favorite comedian is probably Norm MacDonald.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Yeah, Brooks is hard to top as THE most overrated kike of all time.

        I’ll toss Sondheim onto the pile, although I will admit liking the score of Company.

        Like

    • Bob Dylan wrote a few good songs, but his composition and execution of them generally sucked.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        If he wasn’t a yid, and the Byrds hadn’t fully arranged some of his early work and made them sound like something, he’d be about as famous as Barry McGuire or Donovan… if that.

        Like

    • (((Bb))) says:

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        She has indeed mastered the forms of yenta melodramatic self-aggrandizement.

        We shall follow her career with interest. :duckface

        Like

      • Ripp says:

        (((per capita)))

        Conveniently left out of EVERY fucking argument from (((lefotids))).

        Liked by 1 person

      • (((Bb))) says:

        In the long run, bloodlines like hers need to prevail over those like yours. (Not to say I don’t wish your daughters well.)

        In time, this will be obvious (if isn’t already) to the elites not just of the West, but to those of Turkey, Iran, China, etc.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        In the long run, bloodlines like hers need to prevail over those like yours.

        It’s only a binary choice to (((you))) people… my people say there should be, and could be, room for both. We celebrate your achievements pretty much to the same degree you denigrate ours.

        And for the record, many folks, including perhaps you yourself, might rethink that whole bloodline prevailing choice if they saw my kids standing (and playing) next to this little cherub.

        (Not to say I don’t wish your daughters well.)

        Awfully white of you.

        Like

      • hard9bf says:

        Her compositions are insipid and derivative, buried under at least 200 years worth of dust. She plays the fiddle very well, gorgeous vibrato, always in tune. And, like most musicians, she should never open her mouth in public.

        Like

      • Fred says:

        So what specific type of revenge do you suggest that we take for centuries of war and oppression, facilitated by (((bloodlines like yours))), which have stymied or genocided non-Jewish bloodlines like hers?

        I’d imagine that the demographic and sociopolitical results from releasing niggers on us, alone, have to be at least worth a handful of pogroms in addition to some “forced interbreeding” with said niggers.

        What say you?

        Like

  24. […] Source: Heartiste […]

    Like

  25. Sean Fielding says:

    Tom Wolfe (‘Radical Chic’): “You can’t take the fink out of Finkelstein.”

    – said by fellow Skypes a propos of Ann Coulter’s ex-BF, Andrew Stein (nee Finkelstein).

    Like

  26. cortesar says:

    .
    It is best to let (((them))) speak, they have always tended to write self indictments of highest quality despite being so smart (as they want us to believe)
    You Gentiles was written in 1924 They felt untouchable at the time
    Europe was still heavily bleeding from self inflicted wounds, Russia was overun by (((Bolsheviks)))
    For the first time in 500 years our world was crumbling
    We all know what followed

    Liked by 2 people

    • cortesar says:

      Bil Kristolnacht calling for lazy white working people replacement

      Like

      • mmaier2112 says:

        Fuck Kristol. The feds introduced massive taxation on the USA while massively-inflating the currency and banning alcohol and the ownership of gold. The early 1900s gutted the traditions of the USA and got them used to the boot on their neck.

        I wouldn’t doubt it for a second that Jew / Communist bankers and lawyers created the Great Depression on purpose to crush the spirit of freedom and individuality in the United States forever.

        That prick FDR’s cabinet was rife with Commie bastards. McCarthy’s ONLY sin was not be extreme enough to expose it all.

        Like

    • Ben shona says:

      Yeah,but our Hero was defeated,tragically.

      Like

    • Beautiful Truths Ignored says:

      Mind boggling. Jewish hyper-ethnocentrism is beyond parody.

      When I first read the New Testament, I felt sorry for the Pharisees. I thought Jesus was being too hard on a bunch of guys who were striving to please God.

      But now I understand. They weren’t worshipping God, they were worshipping *themselves*. They were worshipping the Jewish people. That is the meaning of the parable of the wicked vinedressers; appropriating for themselves that which belongs rightly to God – worship. The parable is a rebuke to Jewish hyper-ethnocentrism, which has only gotten worse after two millennia of Talmud, seven centuries of Kabbalah, and a century of Freud.

      Similarly, Paul’s epistle to the Galatians, especially 3:28, rebuked ethno-masochism. By acceding to the demands of the Pharisees and allowing themselves to be circumcised, thinking this necessary for salvation, the Galatians were abasing themselves before, and directing their worship towards, the Jewish people rather than towards God – just like today’s Christian Zionists.

      The Nazis proved that gentiles, too, can commit the sin of hyper-ethnocentrism.

      There is need for a preacher who will denounce both hyper-ethnocentrism and the equal and opposite sin of ethno-masochism, and instead preach the virtue of humble yet dignified ethno-patriotism.

      Like

      • Mike says:

        Yeah, you’re wrong. You’re conflating your hate of the Jews with a perceived justification to hate their ethnonationalist political system.

        Where the Jews go wrong is in their desire to rule the world, not in their desire to implement a pro ethnic survivalist political system.

        Your “ethnic patriotism”, whatever that is, would not be politically strong enough to survive the Jews. Anything weaker than what they implement will crumble beneath it.

        You have to priortize survival, not an invented anti-nationalist morality. Only when you do this will you survive.

        You have to get away from Jewish narratives that are meant to destroy you and any significant resistance, such as their demonization of the Nazis, universalist Christian morality, etc.

        Only when you stop playing in their psychological sandbox can you be free of them.

        Like

  27. mmaier2112 says:

    Fuck the Jooos. Seriously, I don’t care if they are 100% overrun by the ragheads and murdered to the very last of them. They use the Muslims to stab the West in the back by immigration, rob the world blind through fiat currencies and massive bank fraud all over the world, run Pedo-Hollywood and promote filth and every manner of degeneracy everywhere they go.

    God wants to keep them on the planet, He can save them. Me, I wouldn’t piss on them were they all on fire in front of me.

    Like

  28. Days of Broken Arrows says:

    Where did my comment go?

    Like

  29. Truth-hammer says:

    To clean out the (((judiciary))) would entail more of an ethnic cleansing. Just for laughs, open your Yellow Pages to “lawyers” and count the bergs, burgs, blatts, steins, et al that comprise our legal system and thus the judiciary. We have been f*cked for a very long time.

    Like

  30. Truth-hammer says:

    BTW, in addition to Nigger Fatigue, I have Jew Fatigue.

    Like

  31. Hashed says:

    It is not “disproportionate Jewish”, because on one hand you count the lefties out of all the whites but for Jews your sample is only American Ashkenazi non orthodox Jews. Even if you just look at the whites in America it is a huge sample comparing to the sample of Jews you are looking at. If you looked at all Jews all over the world, which is still a very small number of people, you will find that they are split around all the major issues in no other way than the whites around the world.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      When an alleged 3% of the population pretty much control the entirety of MSM, and those venues they don’t directly control are nevertheless in lock-step with their agenda, if they know what’s good for them, well…

      … that’s pretty much as “disproportionate” as you can get, by any connotation or denotation of the word.

      Save the yidspeak for those who are still slumbering… you’re dealing with the awoke, here at the chateau.

      Like

      • Hashed says:

        But those alleged 3% (Ashkenazi secular Jews) also control the media in Israel and everybody else thinks that the media is leftists, exactly like in America. Only that the people who complain in Israel are also Jews, but those people don’t get into the count.

        Like

      • Mike says:

        Where equivocation over “Leftist” Israel always falls short is the fact that any so-called “Leftist” content coming out of Israel, directed toward Israel, is done so in the context of a purposeful racially dominant ethnostate.

        Also, most of this Leftist content is uncritical of that context.

        Thus, this Leftist Israeli content is a farce (except when directed toward Europe and America).

        To wit, who cares if Haaretz prints a pro-Palestinian article when they aren’t calling for the dissolution of Israel, as any Leftist outlet would do for such a state outside of Israel?

        Almost all Leftist content in Israel is, essentially, contextually pro-ethnostate. It’s a ruse so as to give the goyim the impression that the Media is politically even-handed between Jews and gentiles. It isn’t.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        It doesn’t really matter if the Israelis argue amongst themselves, does it? The maxim “Two Jews, Three Opinions” and “stiff-necked” arose for a reason.

        Furthermore, they can kvetch all they wish in Israel about media control… it doesn’t seem to be preventing them from having their homeland and “Us First, Always”.

        When Israel is overrun by third-world muslims and shitskins, and your own courts are backing THEM up, rather than the host population, come back and tell us how “Oy vey, Vee have ze same complaints as you goys across the pond!”

        I noticed you already got YOUR wall, Schlomo… not tell your fellow “secular” kikes on this side of the ocean to shut the fuck up and let us build ours.

        It’ll do wonders towards eradicating that ol’ antisemitic jealous-’cause-you’re-so-smart thing.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

    • cortesar says:

      “The unbelieving and radical Jew is as different from the radical gentile as the orthodox Jew from the reactionary gentile. The cosmopolitanism of the radical Jew springs from his feeling (shared by the orthodox Jew) that there is no difference between gentile and gentile. You are all pretty much alike: then why this fussing and fretting and fighting? The Jew is not a cosmopolitan in your sense.” (p. 150)

      You G(oyim)entiles
      Maurice Samuel

      Like

    • Mike says:

      “If you looked at all Jews all over the world, which is still a very small number of people, you will find that they are split around all the major issues in no other way than the whites around the world”.

      Untrue.

      Where Jews largely do not differ is on the primacy of what is good for the Jews.

      Jews on the Left and the Right come together over the Jews; before they divide over anything else.

      A Jew on the Left or the Right would almost always choose “the Jews” over any political ideology or ideological group that is also comprised of gentiles.

      This is the marked difference between where gentile politics have been purposefully molded over the centuries, and the politics of Jews. And it is everything.

      Europeans have often gone to war over differences in Left / Right political ideology. The Left / Right divide with the Jews largely only exists secondary to the politics of Jewish well being.

      Bill Kristol and Jonah Goldberg are more politically aligned with Lena Dunham than they are with Gavin McInnes, when the political noise is filtered.

      The Jews come first, and all other politics are downstream from this belief. Whether they are preaching economic libertarianism or feminism as the political ideology for the goyim to pursue, the end result of dividing and politically confusing the goyim for the political benefit of the ethnonationalist Jews is exactly the same for both strategies.

      Like

  32. Fred says:

    Around 1995, in his first lecture on the Book of Exodus as part of his 18-year project to teach the Torah verse by verse, Dennis Prager said: “The Jewish dream is that the world not be based on blood ties…”

    Like

  33. Anonymous says:

    I’d be willing to bet the 2nd comment was removed due to a bot flagging the word Jew irregardless of context. Go back and post something positive abouts Jews and see what happens. Delete it later if it bothers you stay stay up.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion