Feed on
Posts
Comments

Chicks Dig Dominant Men

“nothing gets a woman wetter than presenting her with the severed head of my enemy”

Another reminder that chicks dig dominant men, and the feminist/SJW assertion that masculinity is toxic to women’s feelings is a bald-cunt’d lie.

*TOXIC MASCULINITY INTENSIFIES*

It’s funny watching a woman come face to face with her id. It’s the rare bird who is sufficiently self-aware to grasp the reality of what turns her on — a dominating alpha male — without calling in rationalization hamster reinforcements.

This id-awareness in women always opens to something “dark within”, because, factually, female sexuality is far darker than male sexuality. The worst a man can do sexually — rape a woman — pales in the scope of its evil to the worst that a woman can do sexually — cuckold a gullible loving man into unwittingly raising a child not his own for the duration of his life.

Women can’t help themselves. They, just like men, are slaves to their reproductively-differentiated lustful desire. The uncontrollable female arousal for dominating men is equivalent to the uncontrollable male desire for young, beautiful women.

The fact that women so often compare their sexual self-knowledge to immorality should tell us that women grasp, on a deeply submerged subconscious level, that their female sexuality is a wild ferocious beast that might be better for everyone if tamed by social constraints on its expression.

Contrast to the self-aware man: rarely does he knee-jerk conflate his desire with immorality or “darkness within”. Most men are pretty darned comfortable with the nature of their sexuality. That’s because we men don’t get turned on by women berating their lessers or throwing the heads of their enemies at our feet.

When women rage against their vagene, the vagene always wins. The sexual market rules over all markets, including that quaint higher order market colloquially known as “the moral sense”. A woman may be ashamed to tingle in the company of a stone cold asshole, but that won’t stop her from spreading for him, or fantasizing about it. A thousand cuntfessionals can’t impede the Darwinian Imperative.

PS Love wins!

212 Responses to “Chicks Dig Dominant Men”

  1. Dr. trav777 says:

    nah we just reach back and smack them hoez

    Liked by 2 people

    • A sensitive man. A thinker. A doer. A sampler of many pastas . . . and a lover of wine.

      Travis. The most interesting man in the world.

      (“I don’t always smoke ho’s, but when I do, I leave a ring imprint on her”)

      Liked by 4 people

    • Aristarchus says:

      Internal compulsion > brute force.

      As Machiavelli observed, between love and fear, it is easier to rule by fear—but more powerful to rule by love. Historical archetypes:

      Rule by love = Hitler.
      Rule by fear = Stalin.

      Any juiced-up jackass can smack a woman around. Only a MAN can inspire in a woman such devotion that if he dies, she will mount his funeral pyre, and burn herself alive in the fire of her love.

      The manner in which CH said this is debatable; but I have a particular meaning when I say, for my own part:

      PS Love wins!

      (P.P.S., ceterum censeo, Mr. T, your methods are probably best for your nigger “hoez”. You → rope.)

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Rule by love = Hitler.
        Rule by fear = Stalin.

        Then by your pseudo-logic,

        FEAR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOVE

        Like

      • Lowe says:

        Aristarchus sounds majorly gay, talking about using Jedi mind tricks on women.

        Like

      • dblr619 says:

        “Rule by love = Hitler.
        Rule by fear = Stalin.”

        VERY interesting take.
        Expound (within reason lol!!!)

        Ps.
        I think that makes me the 1st here to ask you to write moar…lololzzzzz
        Ribbing, not snarkin, A

        Pppppppsssssss(heh-heh CH)
        From good girls to club slots, an OCCASIONAL heavy(not abusive)hand has its place bro. Dont blame me bishes are twisted.

        Like

      • “Only a MAN can inspire in a woman such devotion that if he dies, she will mount his funeral pyre, and burn herself alive in the fire of her love.”

        Blue pill idealism.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        bring the rope any time aristacuck

        you talk about hanging me, come try it bitch

        Like

      • INDY says:

        Stfu deep blue

        Liked by 1 person

      • Aristarchus says:

        Mr. Griswold: Are you unaware of the history of the Aryan Hindu practice of suttee? Widows (usually voluntarily) climbed onto their husbands’ funeral pyres, and burnt themselves alive. The word “suttee” is derived from the Sanskrit word meaning ‘faithful wife’.

        I am stating a fact, not “blue pill idealism”. How does your “Game” theory explain that one?

        I assure you, you will never have even the slightest chance at ever obtaining such devotion with “Game”. Granted, the chance is anyway slim in this corrupted society; those ancient Aryan girls were raised quite differently. But it is nonzero, given the religiously devotional nature of women. Women are by nature fanatics at whatever they believe in. If they believe in feminism, then you will observe, they are intransigent fanatics for it.

        Insensate dolt: Libtards accuse me of having a “Machiavellian personality”; you call it “Jedi mind tricks”. OK.

        Mr. T: Once again, you reply just like nigger bucks and coalburners do when they are informed of the coming DOTR. Oh, how they sneer at that talk! Well, laugh it up—while you still can.

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        @dblr619: Good question. I hope to continue this discussion, or further elaborate later. (My “expounding” does take me some time; and IRL stuff interferes at the moment!)

        The short version: Hitler was well and truly loved by his people (and btw, German women voters were a major part of his “base”). The (((Hollywood))) image of “Nazi Gestapo terror” is a Jewish Big Lie: The overwhelming majority of Germans loved Hitler, I mean, really loved him. You can see this love show clearly in peacetime videos—and when the War came, most Germans of all classes, all ages, and both sexes willingly embraced TOTAL WAR and endured hardship and self-sacrifice, both on the battlefront and the homefront (under Anglo-American firebombing). All for “Führer und Vaterland”. All for love.

        At the War’s end, millions of disarmed German men were outright murdered by the Americans, millions of German women were mass gang-ŕ4p3d by Soviet Mongols, all survivors were starved—and Hitler was no longer with them. Many in the War generation still loved him, but they were broken… and their children were thoroughly brainwashed in (((school))) to hate Hitler, and hate their own parents for having supported Hitler.

        Stalin in fact ruled by naked terror—unpredictable disappearances in the middle of the night, mass-murder, torture, GULAGs, etc. Stalin was hated but feared. In WWII, he had Jewish NKVD “retreat-blocking” units aiming machine-guns at the backs of his own soldiers, to force them to fight. Until the tide of the war turned in about 1943, many of the White Russian portions of the army deserted and surrendered to the Germans whenever they had a chance! Because Germany treated POWs according to Geneva Convention standards, this actually placed a huge burden on German logistics; in 1941, they rapidly wound up with so many Russian prisoners that they had trouble feeding and housing them.

        As I mentioned, Machiavelli called this one hundreds of years ago: Rule by fear is easy and powerful. Rule by love is difficult, for it requires a supreme mastery; but it is much more powerful.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Aristarchus says:

        INDY: Deep Blue now plays human chess, with new algorithms based on neural networks.

        Checkmate. Give up? (Y/y) _

        Like

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        you talk a lot aristacuck

        let’s see some action

        bring your rope

        Like

      • Tarl Cabot says:

        While I have little sentimentality for the Reich, I can attest to the traumatic effect of its collapse on the German people. Even three generations on, they are all like abused children- dead inside. It explains much about the current state of German politics, and why they welcome rapefugees to deliver them from their pain. Once unarguably the highest culture in Europe, it is now a society which has lost the will to live.

        Whatever the true extent of the Whole-o-cause, the Germans have paid for it…in spades.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Yo says:

        Germans developed
        The heat to electrical generator
        And the mosquitto catcher
        runs on electric
        but yea they were Made to pay psychology for sure in school
        Is There anything i can think of that they cant build

        Like

      • @Aristo

        “How does your “Game” theory explain that one?”

        What you mean to say is: “How does your ‘Red Pill’ theory explain that one?”

        And the answer is that women are driven by social validation. They will pursue it above all else.

        If throwing herself into a fire provides a woman social validation, then she will do it. If shaving her head, getting tattoos, cock hopping, and aborting children so she can focus on her HR career provides a woman social validation, then she will do it. It really doesn’t matter what the behaviour is, as long as it gives her the good feelz.

        Tldr; hop a woman up on enough social validation (and opium in this case), and your Aryan Hindu wife will absolutely kill herself, but don’t think for a second that it was your Chad-essence that “inspired” her to do it.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Aristarchus says:

        Mr. Cabot, stripped of the rest of your comment, this alone would have gotten from me one hundred “likes”:

        I can attest to the traumatic effect of its collapse on the German people. Even three generations on, they are all like abused children- dead inside. It explains much about the current state of German politics, and why they welcome rapefugees to deliver them from their pain. Once unarguably the highest culture in Europe, it is now a society which has lost the will to live.

        You sound putatively French, or at least otherwise European, which would make you incomparably better-informed as to today’s ground truth than almost any of the Americans here. I get angry at the sneers I sometimes see about “German cûcks”, from those whose country is still militarily occupying Germany in a legal state of war, and has all along used that occupation to prop up a (((puppet government))) that enforces the effect you describe. However, I urge you to revisit and review the pertinent history—“history”, as in “due to our history”, as the sad, broken Germans have been (((forcibly brainwashed))) to say.

        (As for the French, I will fully endorse the praise that Hitler accorded them after he had settled the score of the Versailles humiliation, and thence let bygones be bygones in the old Aryan way.)

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        [Damnit, m0db0t—take 2, now both ḿúńǵéḑ and censored.]

        Mr. Griswold, your “Red Pill” sounds like 0ṕiuḿ:

        If throwing herself into a fire provides a woman social validation, then she will do it.

        I will take this as more evidence for my theory that “Game” is half an oversimplified, hyped-up repackaging of ancient men’s wisdom, and half a crock of self-serving fanţasies and ratiońalizations that appeal to both the bitterness of the ḑivoŗce-ŕ4p3d, and the thirst of “incels”.

        At this point, though, I realize that I am arguing against the caţechism of a reliǵion that is no more raţional than feminism. Feminism reduces all the world’s problems to a smaļĺ set of rôte answers: “Mûh Ṕatriarchy”, “toẍic masćulinity”, etc. “Game” ţheory reduces similarly: Why, the riţual śeļf-ıḿḿoļaţion of a ‘faiţhful ẃife’ (Skt. satï) is explained, and fully explained, by “soçial vaļiḑation”!

        If you want to expand your vision beyond the horiźons of this ćuļt, look to some older, wiser auţḩors for e.g. the hiśtorical view that women invenţed the faḿily strucţure. Ẃomankind ńever had the vision to create much of significance beyond the liḿited horiźons of the home; but they exceļļed at neśting within their own łimited world, whilst men were out building the êmpires and civiliźations that ûltimately rested on the faḿilial fouńdation ļaiḑ by ẃomen.

        —Will you now accuse me of being a “feḿinist”? Wait, no, feḿinists claim that the faḿily was invented by Muh Paţŕiarchy to oṕṕress wýmýns! Have fûn answering that one…

        Ŕeaļ ĺife is fār more compleẍ thań “Red Pill” ḑŕugs can exṕlain to you.

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        m0d test—is this what #triǵǵ3red the r0b0t, even munged?

        Everýthing in ẃoman is a riḑḑle, and everýthing in ẃoman ḩatḩ one śoļution—it is called ṕreǵnancy.

        Ḿan is for ẃoman a meaņs: the puŗpose is aļways the çḩild. But wḩat is ẃoman for ḿan?

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        WTF? I guess my guess was wrong. Sorry to have accused you there, m0db0t. But it’s not much better if some arbitrary word gets blocked when not turned to Śáńśḱŕíţ.

        Like

      • “I will take this as more evidence for my theory that “Game” is…”

        I’m not talking about game, I’m talking about the red pill. Game is a subset of the red pill. All game is red pill, but not all red pill is game.

        “I realize that I am arguing against the caţechism of a reliǵion that is no more raţional than feminism”

        Feminism is perfectly rational—it accomplishes the goals that the feminine seeks: the maximal restriction of beta male sexuality, and maximal freedom of female hypergamy.

        Long term, the goal of feminism is the relegation of sub-par male genetics to reproductive oblivion. Us men can laugh and neener neener feminism’s “senselessness” and “irrationality” but the fact remains that feminism is doing EXACTLY what it’s supposed to do.

        “…the hiśtorical view that women invenţed the faḿily strucţure.”

        What do you mean by “family structure”? Like how women stay home and take care of the house and young kids, while men go out and build shit and acquire resources?

        No. Women did not invent this. Neither did men. The family structure is ordained by the biomechanical/neurochemical realities imbued in us by eons of evolution. It doesn’t make sense to send fragile and emotionally stunted women out to kill a mountain lion and have the stronger, more aggressive men stay home and weave baskets. In this way, you have a family structure that wasn’t consciously “invented” by anyone, let alone a woman lol.

        Like

      • JOSEPH ANGEL says:

        Right on, homey. The first waves of Soviet soldiers were white and warned the Germans to head west away from the on-coming waves of Soviet muslim and Oriental peasant soldiers (the ones who perpetrated the mass rape and murder and were encouraged by the Soviet jew propagandists at the that time). I tend to believe that many of this blog’s patrons are younger men who were never taught true history but only the jew revisionist crap that even I remember in school in the 60’s. Keep hammering away.

        Like

  2. mendo says:

    I’m watching the sexual market play out but in an office setting. Deep down you can tell that all the ladies are trying to use their sexual wiles on the unsuspecting, while comparing their sexiness with the other ladies.. It’s there, they try to hide it. Game opens up the third-eye-blind and all sorts of shit starts appearing where it wasn’t before.*

    The blog and choice comments help me parse out whatever my instincts don’t catch or get.

    And when women rage against their vagene, they get drunk, then rage against the latrine. (Or is that versa vice? Always confoose the two)

    *I think there’s something there
    That was there before

    Liked by 2 people

    • It’s so very difficult to reconcile classical Western notions of Good & Evil with what Evopsych predicts about the Hamster’s ingrained & pre-programmed behavior within the great darwinian petri dish.

      tl;dr == Do moast humans even have souls?

      Like

      • mendo says:

        Cappy, yes, they do, however they drown it, stab it, crap on it every chance they get because they’ve been told life’s all an illusion anyway so may as well YOLO!

        On that note, something I’ve witnessed yesterday: overheard a shitlib was talking to a libertarian about the usual yadda-yadda bullshit, however, for the shitlib, all her words sounded as though she lifted them from other people’s stories. As in at some point, she just remembered a story of someone else and then said it as verbatim as she could to pass it off as her own experience. (She has none!) The entire convo sounded unbelievably manufactured from her end. The inflections and anticipations-of-reactions-on-certain-phrases were stark. The libertarian is a poofer so their talk is always phony or overly effeminate. But the girl–beyond NPC. She’s nothing.

        These people with no soul, cannot generate dialog, that is, they cannot converse because they do not live–they exist. They don’t do anything worthwhile, only “moving” via swiping here and texting there. That furthers the illusion and obviously adds to the disconnect.

        And the troubles they have with it all are when that soul tries to resurface, vis a vie your conscious telling you what’s naturally obvious, but that’s been suppressed. No wonder they’re all drugged up. Adds even more fire.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        >>>>> “but that’s been suppressed. No wonder they’re all drugged up”

        Before I even moved on past the period, to the next sentence, I was already thinking to myself, “SSRIs”.

        PS: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=YOLO

        Like

      • Go to that dark place, CO. If no souls, what is the big scheme of things? You already know, somewhere.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        RD, what if some people have souls, but other people don’t?

        That’s effectively what ?Cohen/Cauvin/Calvin? was preaching in Switzerland.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Do psychopaths have souls?

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        Oh, this is rich! The admitted mental defective crawls out of his “own mental zip code” for long enough to ask the glorifier of psýchopathy a “dark place” question about “no souls”. The Stalinist who expressly glorifies psýchopathy then directly implies that psýchopaths have no souls—but other men may. —Thus, as I have been saying all along: Captain Oblivion is deliberately, systematically trying to kill men’s souls with his “STOP CARING” poison.

        A cure for the both of you: ¡!¡ⓈⓊⒾⒸⒾⒹⒺ ⓅⒶⓇⓉⓎ!¡!

        “‘Reality’ Doug” (replete with self-applied scare-quotes on “reality”), you know that there is no god, no heaven, no hell. Dreamless eternal sleep awaits you. Why wallow in self-pity? Your “own mental zip code” is a lonely place; and you will someday die anyway. Please end your suffering. “If no souls, what is the big scheme of things? You already know, somewhere.” Yes, indeed—you are right, as for yourself! For you, the big scheme of things is that you should exit your life right now.

        My Dark Place is darker than yours. It invites you. It will consume you. For I have stared into the Abyss—and it smiled at me

        Men who do not want to lose their souls: Reject nihilism. START CARING.

        Whether you believe in a mystical spirit that survives death, or, as I do, you use the word “soul” as a convenient term for the will to Life that animates all healthy men, do not lose your soul.

        But for those who do not CARE, and do not want to, it is my kindest act of charity to remind them:

        “Nihil melius aeterna lex fecit, quam quod unum introitum nobis ad vitam dedit, exitus multos.” — Seneca, “Epist. mor.”, 26. (“The power that had shaped the universe had done nothing more beneficent than to provide that while there was only one entrance to life, there were many exits.”)

        Like

      • Yo says:

        Some people Arist
        Are not allowed to exit
        So easy
        Either those God punishes
        Or those he loves

        Like

      • Yo says:

        Somtimes probably both
        He he he

        Like

      • Yo says:

        Ex ex got hit put on her
        I think
        She got shot at not dead
        One who paid for hit i think
        Is dead
        Gods ironic
        World
        Is
        Ironic

        Like

      • Rider says:

        Mendo, right on about today’s western woman.

        Like

      • Reinald Vallejo says:

        If there is no God of course stop caring. That’s the easy way out. That’s how we get globalists. You would not care about your country, race, or other people at all. And you obviously would not be here because that is not what is taught here. Yes you are encumbered with a burden of duty, but you are not sure what to do about it. God will show you what to do about it everyday day. There will always be something else you can do. God will show you.

        Like

      • Yo says:

        Yea reinold i believe so
        Working
        On living bro
        Trying to work with
        Limitations
        Had a blast with my wife
        Grrr time to go back almost
        Ill deal with it
        Got people who love me in us too
        I guess
        Ex ex told my wife on phone
        She Will take care of me There
        So i make it back to wife ok
        Guess She didnt lie
        Got me to get that thing on my side fixed
        Love does win
        Working on death wish part
        Put myself in gods hands
        Last month
        He hasent disapointed yet i suppose
        Guess some pretty serius support
        Even though i may have got heartbroke too
        I was at the end of me
        In 2009
        Guess Ten years has helped
        Some
        Thanks
        Been a fucking journey

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        >>>>> “If there is no God of course stop caring.”

        Jesus H Chr!st.

        We’re gonna hafta rework y’all’s ids from the ground up.

        Sheesh.

        Do any of you even read the Gospels?

        Like

      • Reinald Vallejo says:

        Or read them a romance novel and make them feel happy. Either way it’s into the fire they will go.

        Like

    • dblr619 says:

      Look da fuc out, Testivoli got a new shipment grrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. The Judge says:

    Conflicting feelings and uneasiness regarding “deep dark sexual desires” is only a problem for vanilla (no, not white) women completely out of touch with themselves. Ghetto girls don’t have these issues. They have no trouble having orgasms either. Something to be said for their Earthiness. Everything is right up front, including their desires and expectations from men. No need for massive surveys and millions of dollars spent on sex studies.

    Liked by 1 person

    • But are they even fully human?

      Especially, do they even have souls?

      What if Judgement Day is gonna be especially hard on those of us who should have known better?

      From whom moar was given, moar will be expected?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Amon Ra says:

        ” What if Judgement Day is gonna be especially hard on those of us who should have known better? ”

        I wouldn’t worry about that Captain. You’re a self professed Marxist, with an infatuation with one of the world’s greatest butchers. I dont think the afterlife is in your world view.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        I’m not a marxist.

        I’m a Stalinist.

        Djugashvili realized that the only solution to these Frankfurt-School-created psychological maelstroms is a trip to the Lubyanka & a bu11et in the back of the head [the cost of which is then billed to the surviving family members].

        INSULA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AMYGDALA

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        But are they even fully human?

        Especially, do they even have souls?

        You certainly don’t have a soul. You sold it to “Uncle Joe”.

        You are equal to a bacterium—nay, lower than a bacterium; and when you die, inevitably die, you yourself will become a Great Darwinian Petri Dish as your superiors consume you, and turn you to dust. You are nihil, you came from nihil, and to nihil you shall return.

        Embrace your fate! Dreamless eternal sleep awaits you: Oblivion.

        Gotta STOP CARING! Gotta K1ŁŁ Y0UŖS3LF!

        Gotta go to that D A R K · P L A C E !!

        From whom moar was given, moar will be expected?

        Souls are for those who CARE. That is what is “expected”.

        [Also, souls are for those who don’t use airheaded, low-IQ teenage-girl saccharine cutesy misspellings, such as “moar”. You cheezburger. MOAR CUTE. Men CARE about not talking like retards.]

        Like

      • Amon Ra says:

        ” a bu11et in the back of the head ”

        I’m not against that in theory, but I doubt that’ll get you into the
        ,widely accepted , Christian version of the afterlife.

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        I’m not a marxist.

        I’m a Stalinist.

        Jewish-tier chutzpah. Whom do you fancy you could fool with that, whereas Stalin was a (((Marxist)))? K 1 Л Л · Y 0 U Я S З L F !!

        Gotta go to that D A Я K · P L A C E !!

        (p.s., poshel na huy.)

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        >>>>> ” Whom do you fancy you could fool with that, whereas Stalin was a (((Marxist)))?”

        Djugashvili was very much not a marxist; Djugashvili was a stalinist.

        Apparently* in 1934, Djugashvili had a long walk in the woods with Kirov, begging Kirov to pull back from the brink: Djugashvili very much desired to keep their marxist-leninism strictly confined to the old Ts@rist borders, but Kirov was he11 bent on taking marxist-leninism global.

        That was when Djugashvili realized that Kirov was utterly unaware that marxist-leninism was just a grand s@tanic joke being played on the goyim by the Frankfurt School – that Kirov was actually a TRUE BELIEVER who worshipped at the altar of marxist-leninism.

        And so, after a great deal of sou1-searching, Djugashvili decided to liquidate Kirov.

        If Kirov had prevailed over Djugashvili, the Second World War would not have been confined to only about a third of the Earth: Kirov, in his Insula-driven insanity, would have burned everything to the ground.

        Finally, after Kirov no longer posed an existential threat to the people of Russia, Djugashvili was free to unleash the Terror as payback for the Frankfurt School having st@rved to de@th ten million Ukrainians in the H0l0d0m0r.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        *The historical records of Djugashvili’s long walk with Kirov only just resurfaced a couple of years ago.

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        marxist-leninism was just a grand s@tanic joke being played on the goyim by the Frankfurt School

        WTF, Captain Oblivion, are you on LSD? How did the Frankfurt School, founded in 1923, create or control Marxism-Leninism!? (No time to address any of this now, so I will just pick out the most ludicrous point.)

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        The Frankfurt School was created no later than about 5000BC.

        We just didn’t realize it until very recently.

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        Damnit, m0db0t ate two of my attempts to reply to subversive lies, and then (((WP))) silently discarded the ultra-compressed version.

        ❢ⓀⒾⓁⓁ ⓎⓄⓊⓇⓈⒺⓁⒻ❢

        ❢ⒹⒶⓇⓀ ⓅⓁⒶⒸⒺ❢

        ❢ⒹⓄ ⒾⓉ❢

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        Gotta STOP CARING about winning saving face while losing an argument on the Internet.

        ʞıłł yourself! DAAAAARK PLACE!¡! Dark!

        Like

      • Tarl Cabot says:

        The Captain’s infatuation with Stalinism may be misplaced, but he is correct that Stalin represented the victory, however incomplete, of Communism over (((Communism))). Most of the once and future Democrats who called themselves “neocons” were, in fact, Trotskyites (and still are).

        Like

  4. Anonymous says:

    How many lonely nice guys have you met? Now contrast that with the number of lonely asshole bad boys.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Steve Sellout [back when I read him, before he sold out], used to refer to an old Benjamin Franklin aphorism about how if you wanted a man to despise you, then you should do a favor for him, whereas if you wanted a man to adore you, then you should demand a favor of him.

      The empirically-confirmed realities of evopsych amount to some seriously amoral nihilistic sh!znat.

      Like

  5. cortesar says:

    There is no other race on the planet that is treated in this way. You aren’t even allowed to organise to defend your own interests. Think about that. https://t.co/Dz0XYxyhdn

    — Albion Eternal (@AlbionIsEternal) March 27, 2019

    Like

    • “ORGANIZED” h@te groups

      LOL’ed.

      No movement in all of human history has been as hopelessy disorganized as is the mau1 right.

      [Which might be precisely why the mau1 right has proved to be so difficult for the Frankfurt School to exterminate.]

      ORGANIZED h@te groups would be the ACLU, the SPLC, the ADL, the DNC, CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, AIPAC, etc etc etc.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Carefully scripted & organized Frankfurt School h@te narratives versus the utterly disorganized but organically derived h@te memes of the mau1 right is setting up to be the ultimate test of Determinism/Deductivism versus Instinctualism/Empiricism.

        Sun Tzu would have l0ved to have been alive to learn how this one plays itself out.

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        what is that thing you call ” mau1 right”?

        “Man muss noch Chaos in sich haben, um einen tanzenden Stern gebären zu können.
        (You must have chaos within you to give birth to a dancing star.)”

        ― Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra

        Liked by 1 person

      • Aristarchus says:

        cortesar,, thanks:

        Alas! There cometh the time when man will no longer give birth to any star. Alas! There cometh the time of the most despicable man, who can no longer despise himself.

        Lo! I show you THE LAST MAN.

        “What is love? What is creation? What is longing? What is a star?”—so asketh the last man and blinketh.

        What is CARING?

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        What is longing
        ——————————————————————————–
        there is one longing still haunting elementary particles at the end of a long day
        when their atomized existence becomes almost unbearable
        longing to belong
        to someone
        to something
        to somewhere

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Something – anything – greater than themselves.

        Like

      • “No movement in all of human history has been as hopelessy disorganized as is the mau1 right.”

        It’s called decentralization.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        >>>>> “It’s called decentralization.”

        They say that the goyim who designed the original ARPANET TCP/IP protocols had in mind a system which was so massively decentralized that a finite number of incoming communist nukular w@rheads would not be able to destroy it.

        Like

      • bolg says:

        chaos is impossible to beat, cap, that’s why.
        kind of tcp but without the ack’s. it’s a good thing.

        Like

    • Amon Ra says:

      All this because of the ” authentic ” NZ sho*oting . Never saw this coming. SMH.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Everything now is scripted.

        The Frankfurt School has moved the theatrics out of the psychological laboratory of Ho11ywood and into the physical reality of Meatspace.

        Like

      • INDY says:

        “All this because of the ” authentic ” NZ sho*oting .”

        Yes, they weren’t going to do it anyway. They only did it because of the NZ shooting.

        Like

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        there was nothing inauthentic about the shooting

        listen you CT idiots- what the fuck do you think these OMNIPOTENT rulers needed a fucking shooting for?

        whites would do JACK SHIT if someone just declared open genocide

        “oh wahh, no other race gets this awful treatment”

        Liked by 1 person

      • Augustus says:

        Yes Dr, it was so real, the manifesto, supposedly written by a 8channer, did not blame Jews at all, which is standard modus operandi for any 4chan/8chan poster. The ONE (1) line he stated about Israel was POSITIVE.

        The attack was so authentic, that Mossad had a base in Christchurch.

        https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/newzealand/8649223/Mossad-spy-ring-unearthed-because-of-Christchurch-earthquake.html

        You can keep believing in your fantasy if you wish, but again, this attack did nothing but empower Jews even moreso. The only thing that the jews fear is white organization, which could actually create real change, not some faggot mossad operative “killing” “dozens”, and posting a Manifesto that read like some fed who’s in the “meme department”(this actually exist) wrote it up after a few months of lurking 8chan/4chan & blogs such as this one.

        This is why the Alt-right was quickly attacked, and why the dissedent right is decentralize. Anything to the right of Fox news is vilified because that is where truth resides. No organization=no power the affect change. Even if we take this attack at face value & believe it was real, it does NOTHING to help us. Lone wolf attacks dont do jack shit to change the society. History proves this.

        Like

      • Yo says:

        Well if real may the dead pawns rest in peace
        In the next life

        Like

      • Ironsides says:

        Augustus — go on internalizing defeat to the point where you won’t accept ANY act of resistance, unless it instantly and totally defeats the entire globohomo empire (which is impossible even if it were on the ropes) as being the work of the enemy, who own everything. Who control every mind, every action, every person, every everything, everywhere at once.

        Only the jews and ZOG have agency. The rest of humanity is utterly supine. NOTHING ever happens that they haven’t predicted and arranged.

        It’s hopeless, goyim. We are the only Actors. Everyone else is passive clay who takes our stamp, in all circumstances, forever. Just give up and surrender to us. NOTHING happens, not a single leaf falls, except by Our Will. (((We))) are gods!!!!

        These conspiracy theories are a form of Panopticon.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Lichthof says:

        No false flag

        Like

      • Reinald Vallejo says:

        Don’t call it a conspiracy just because you’re obviously too cowardly to do what the man did just admit it and say you don’t have the balls to do something like that ever in your entire life your entire pathetic a little life.

        Like

      • Augustus says:

        @Ironsides How exactly did that event help Western Europeans or White Americans? How is sh00ting up a M0sque filled with muzzies an “act of resistance”?

        ((Who))) is pulling the strings here? (((who))) is encouraging mass migrations from M.E & Africa, Latin America? Oh shit,you got me, its muzzies.

        Again, the manifesto does not mention a SINGLE utterance of the JEW. The single instance where Israel is mentioned, he states he likes the place.

        Shooter visits Israel for “9” days and given a 90 day visa:

        https://www.timesofisrael.com/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-suspect-reportedly-visited-israel-in-2016/

        Would any one of you stay in that God forsaken for any number of days? I would find that extremely hard to believe.

        Austrian “far-right” group may now face banning after someone with the shooters name donated to their group years back:

        https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-28/austrian-far-right-group-faces-ban-brenton-tarrant-donation/10947002

        How does this help White Europeans again? You will find many articles of NZ banning websites, banning books, etc etc etc. Amazon already went ahead and banned Culture of Critique after this event. Sure though, this helps Whites…

        Did the shooter go and attack (((elites))) or (((perpetrators)))? No?, ok then, wake me up if someone does(no this is not me advocating for such action). Until then, you would be wise to be skeptical of such attacks & condemn them for being a stupid act, again, unless you’re a LARPer or a CIA/FBI agent.

        The only method to win in this system is to A) create an organized group, which the technocratic elites are making extremely hard to do day after day, numbering in the tens of thousands. This is where true power lies, hence why (((gulag,Amazon, Jewbook))) will ban anything advocating “white nationalism” or “white seperatism” etc. Gee, isn’t that a coincidence, when some whites online were starting to float the idea of “ok, you nogs, muzzies and mexicans want california? fine, we will seperate, we just want our own lands” BOOM, jewbook moves in to ban any whispers of that idea specifically…

        Think about who this benefited (((tech monopolies))), (((EU))), (((elites))) and who it actually hurt and made even more powerless. Whether the attack was “real” or not does not change the answer.

        Like

      • Amon Ra says:

        ” Yes, they weren’t going to do it anyway. They only did it because of the NZ shooting. ”

        Of course they would, however, they are obviously accelerating the game plan and these ” shootings ” help facilitate that.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      I belong to no organized political group…

      … I’m a Republican..

      Liked by 2 people

  6. Ironsides says:

    Even 19th century English poets writing about the founding legends of Rome knew this — and in fact cited the severed head as an aphrodisiac:

    On the right goes Romulus,
    With arms to the elbows red,
    And in his hand a broadsword,
    And on the blade a head —

    […]

    On the left side goes Remus,
    With wrists and fingers red,
    And in his hand a boar-spear,
    And on the point a head —

    […]

    Two and two behind the twins
    Their trusty comrades go,
    Four and forty valiant men,
    With club, and axe, and bow.
    On each side every hamlet
    Pours forth its joyous crowd,
    Shouting lads and baying dogs,
    And children laughing loud,
    And old men weeping fondly
    As Rhea’s boys go by,
    And maids who shriek to see the heads,
    Yet, shrieking, press more nigh.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. “It’s funny watching a woman come face to face with her id” bahaha. Because I’m immature, I found this unintentional pun fkn hilarious.

    Like

  8. dblr619 says:

    Good article.
    It IS hardwired/not a bug.
    Dominant over them or another male….SPLOOGE indeed.

    Liked by 1 person

    • If I remember correctly, I was told by a high school history teacher. That under the coliseum there were prostitutes waiting to have sex with the brutal,violent and victorious gladiators. These women would watch and be literally wett with anticipation knowing that they would join the pound me too movement in ancient rome.
      That aside, anyone that can satiate the base instincts of the female id (sic 50 shades of grey) would eventually be airing on a mountain of cash. Nothing turns them on more than being tied up, dominated and being a pain sl*t.

      Liked by 2 people

      • JironGhrad says:

        Not just prostitutes, but wealthy women “paid” to get hammered by winning gladiators.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Eggs are cheap; Alpha sp3rm is expensive.

        Liked by 2 people

      • dblr619 says:

        Well said bro.

        It’s how I roll with my girl and she serves me well and faithfully.

        Every ONCE in awhile I use the slightest excuse and FREAK OUT on her.
        She goes back to being a lamb(NOT her demeanor towards anyone else)and obviously the usual good bang is even better.

        Like

      • Lichthof says:

        Exactly. Sex is violence to them.
        I was pumped after NZ and really went to town on my girl.
        She didnt lnow what hit (sic) her.
        Do that once in a while.

        Liked by 2 people

      • R.G. Camara says:

        Yeah, unsurprising. Take a woman to a boxing/MMA match or a hockey game, or even a horse race or pro wrestling match. At first they’re all squeamish, and then by the end they’re screaming, “Hit him harder!”

        P.S. I think most gladiator matches in Rome were fixed, a la today’s professional wrestling or a lot of 20th-Century boxing. We know for a fact that the vast majority of gladiators didn’t die in the arena–the whole ceremony of “sword down/sword in” was just for show, most died outside the ring of other causes. Far too much money for the slave owners to risk losing a gladiator to a bad fight or bad luck, and even the best gladiators needed some tomato can opponents to knock down on the regular who could also make the up-and-comer look good.

        Like

      • Dr. trav777 says:

        women love violence and love men who are good at it

        this is one of the reasons i consistently tell you low T fags to take up jiu jitsu

        short story, like 12 years ago, I was a blue belt, but a pretty good one and a chick was training with us who was from Salvador and she brought a couple friends with her, also au pairs like she was. One of them was fuckin HOTTTT.

        So i told all the other dudes in class, hey sorry, but I am going to have to whip your ass today. Fortunately this location was newer and i was one of the more senior people lol. So I tore up mofos white and blue belts alike. then I went and talked to this chick. Picked her up, got her number, she ended up being my gf.

        This was an educated chick who told me her friends back home would never let her hear the end of it for dating a jiu jitsu guy bc BJJ guys in brazil have a reputation as thugs. She was 20 I was 36. She actually met my kids at a subsequent time she came with her friend (believe it was to see me).

        but then she moved back to brazil and became a raging feminist…oh well lol

        Like

      • Yo says:

        As cap would say no bun oven

        Like

      • Yo says:

        The canibal warriors
        Of Liberia
        Would not agree
        There were 20 of em living in hit
        After war with not one chick in vicinity
        Or anyone else lol
        Depends on chick
        But they think they like horor till they meet it on the flesh it would seem
        Controlled just violence
        Yea ok sports

        Like

  9. “female sexuality is far darker than male sexuality. The worst a man can do sexually — rape a woman — pales in the scope of its evil to the worst that a woman can do sexually — cuckold a gullible loving man into unwittingly raising a child not his own for the duration of his life.”

    I actually disagree with you on this point. I think these two “evils” are perfectly equal opposites.

    Liked by 2 people

    • I don’t feel like spending a whole lot of time worrying myself to de@th about the correctness of the analogy, but the truly dispiriting thing [for dudes who are still trying to digest the Red Pill which they first swallowed only within the last year or so] is the horrifying reality of how many women would carry to full term and l!ve b!rth a product of c0nception via r@pe by an Alpha Chad versus how many women would sneak off to Planned Murd3rhood to snuff out a product of c0nception via m@rital re1ations with a Beta Bux husb@nd.

      Pondering this sh!znat will send a chill down your spine.

      Liked by 4 people

      • “Pondering this sh!znat will send a chill down your spine.”

        Got it.

        But from the broad’s point of view, the thought of being impregnated and (in a sane society) being forced to live-birth the child of a low value man sends shivers down her spine.

        Forcing a woman (via rape) to birth, care for, and inevitably develop a long term connection with a sub-par man’s progeny is every bit as horrifying to a wahmen as forcing a man (via hypergamic duplicitousness) to financially and emotionally provide for a child that is not biologically his.

        The ends are the same. The means are the same. The crimes are the same.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        The problem you’re making is in assuming that the Hamster views the r@pist’s seed as being sub-par.

        Increasingly, 50 Shades of Beat the Sh!t Outta My A$$ would tend to indicate that the Hamster views the r@pist’s seed as being SUPERIOR to the alternative.

        Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        the difference is that with the alpha chad the woman literally has no agency. she can’t help herself. the effect he has on her is too overpowering. he holds all the cards, even though he might not even use them. she HAS to carry his child to term.

        otoh, all betas to her are inconsequential. their actions are inconsequential. everything they say is inconsequential. everything they do is inconsequential. ergo… killing his unborn child is…

        you guessed it…inconsequential.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        PJ nails it.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Lichthof says:

        PJ nails it but this has been done to death
        Listen to any screaming groupie in front of the rock star

        I posted on here before about hanging around Randy Orton. The women there were usual cordial etc but when he walks in a light switch flicks and they go primal.
        Its surreal to watch but you feel at peace as you realize nature is in full force now like the way our primal elders live.

        Like

      • TerryThePirate says:

        But do Alpha Chads rape? Don’t they get all the p00n they need from willing volunteers?

        Like

    • The only reason women consider rape an offence is because they can’t monetise the transaction.

      Liked by 2 people

      • “The only reason women consider rape an offence is because they MIGHT monetise the transaction.” Animal weakness invites animal attack. They want to be raped by the man that can get away with it, which makes it NOT rape. It’s not rape if you can’t get caught bested.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Women want to be r@ped by precisely the kinds of men whom they want to be r@ped by.

        Similarly, women do not want to be r@ped by precisely the kinds of men whom they do not want to be r@ped by.

        Mind-Hamster Dualism.

        Like

      • Yo says:

        If woman wanted to be raped cap
        There would be places with no tape laws
        The fact that There are tape laws
        Means woman don’t want to be raped
        In reality
        Otherwise they would make men change the law
        If they can get abortion rights
        And no drinking and driving
        They can get anything

        Like

      • bolg says:

        “… The only reason women consider rape an offence is because they can’t monetise the transaction….”

        a rape is a “rape” when it doesn’t go well. with all that entails.

        Like

      • bolg says:

        btw, that yellow jurno bitch decided to sue Kubrat for “attempted rape” after he kissed her on live tv after he beat that fag into a pulp lol.

        he just said he has videos with her. #popcorn.

        Like

  10. I have people.

    I’m lucky to have very good people and I rarely get upset with them if they screw up or even lose my temper.
    But when I do, they get visibly shook and their knees get all wobbly. Shit gets done and quick.

    If you’re in charge of people this is always much more effective than thundering around like an asshole all the time.

    Like

  11. Amon Ra says:

    Why do we still care what chicks ” dig ” ? Seriously gentlemen ?

    Like

    • TruthinPest says:

      Agree – we should focus on attacking White Knightism and on ways to undermine [The Narrative] of 21st century Western society.

      Like

    • guest says:

      Are you a virgin?

      Like

      • Amon Ra says:

        Being a douche bag, you probably don’t eve realize that you just attempted a well worn female technique of ” sexual shaming “. However, being said douche bag, you’ve failed miserably. So sad.

        Like

    • Ironsides says:

      Why? Because we’re a bunch of serfs and they have all the power, thanks to ZOG, so in order to have sex and/or have a chance at having kids, we need to figure out how to bypass these disadvantages by manipulating their psychology — ie, understand what they “dig.”

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        It is a very painful pill to swallow that despite all of my work and growth as a man over these last few years, I’m still not in the “top 20%” (interestingly, about 1 in 5 men in my church social group have girlfriends who are in their 20s, which I’d imagine are the men this gal was referring to). A critical self-assessment would put me in the top third of men in this community, but apparently that still isn’t enough. “Game” is likely my weak spot, and probably the leading factor holding me back at this point. https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2019/02/26/warhorn-responds/#comment-308525

        Like

      • Amon is correctly referring to the other avenue, for which there will soon enough be nothing to lose, and moreover I think he means ‘being your own mental center of origin’. Sure, charm is a useful tool, but– I just pretty much ignore women when I’m out, rarely. They say darkest before the dawn. If SHTF, I will not keep my pen!$ in my pants. I understand what my ancient ancestors did before the Great Christcuck and the Gheyg Eliot theology porn.

        Like

      • @CO, please quote that stuff. I gave longwinded advise lost to mod for nutn. I thought you sounded funny. lol

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        It was from that piece which CH linked to at Dalrock about a week or ten days ago.

        Chr!st-Cucks who are not Top-20% in their church congregations, ergo who fall victim to the Pareto Principle.

        The sh!t is gut-wrenching.

        Also lots of talk about Chr!st-Cucks in the mi1itary getting cuckolded by their philthy wh0re waifus back stateside who are taking strange d!ck up each & every 0rifice while the Chr!st-Cucks are left all alone in the sh!t, getting maimed and k!11ed in order to MIGA.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        >>>>> “They say darkest before the dawn.”

        It’s always DARKEST just before you STOP CARING.

        And then the sun rises on The New You.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        They say darkest before the dawn. If SHTF, I will not keep my pen!$ in my pants. I understand what my ancient ancestors did before the Great Christcuck and the Gheyg Eliot theology porn.

        In your wretched case, things are darkest before they go totally black.

        Nice to see it’s still “not about me”, ’round chere.

        Keep losing, pismire… a new day is coming and, much like the present, your sorry azz is going to get left in the lurch, shunned by man, woman, and beast.

        Like

      • Les Saunders, Protestant says:

        I’ve always found it very disquieting that, even though I’m not typically drowning in poosy with ten plates on the go, and that I have always managed to get a decent poosy a decent amount of the time, that there are men out there who are getting far, far less. I estimate they’re getting laid once a year, if that, and by low quality poosy.

        Theirs are soul-crushing existences.

        Like

      • Les Saunders, Protestant says:

        That they aren’t getting laid is to a great extent their own fault.

        I’ve been on so many work-related trips in mixed company. What do the guys want to in their evenings? Attend platonic dinners with their mârriéd coworker ladies and sit on their hands. Think about it. They’re in a new city/country and instead of going forth and trying to slay poosy, they’d rather just hang out with their mârriéd coworkers and sit in their hotel room and veg.

        I always eschewed these boring affairs and went out and tried to smash as much as possible.

        Like

  12. jabowery says:

    “The worst a man can do sexually — rape a woman — pales in the scope of its evil to the worst that a woman can do sexually — cuckold a gullible loving man into unwittingly raising a child not his own for the duration of his life.”

    Don’t forget flooding a man’s homelands with rapefugees. How does this stack up with raping a woman? How does it stack up with raping and murdering a woman? This, my dear friends, is what the movie “Irreversible” was really about because, as we all know, “Mass immigration is irreversible.” Or, that’s what we supposed to believe.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      This was a Monica Bellucci vehicle?

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Monica Bellucci was one of those very rare hyper-neotenous chicks who peaked around the age of 40.

        Smokin’, baby.

        Smokin’.

        Like

    • Women are not capable of “flooding our homelands with rapefugees” any more than a 9 year old is. Or a dog.

      Women get away with this retarded shit because WE ALLOW IT TO HAPPEN.

      Stop attributing so much power to women. Women are powerless. Just like children are powerless. The only way they can achieve their ends is by manipulating weak men.

      Liked by 6 people

      • jabowery says:

        WE’re all waiting for leaders like you to show us the way. What’s your plan? Or are you just another pseudonymous nigger provoking heroic individuals to go out and “take one for the team” so everyone is left without any _real_ leaders?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Augustus says:

        @jabowery finally, a boomer calling for action.

        Like

      • Re: “waiting for leaders”

        You don’t need to wait for leadership. Be the leader. In your day to day life, in your interactions with people (especially men), in the way you carry yourself, in the limits of what you will and will not tolerate from others.

        Listening to men bitch about how shitty women are is like listening to idiot parents bitch about how unruly their spoiled children are.

        How the fuck do they get that way?? Because we LET THEM get that way.

        When I see a well behaved child, I think to myself: “strong parents in that child’s life”.

        When I see a well behaved woman, I think to myself: “strong men in that woman’s life”.

        Women, children, dogs, they’re all the same; they’re gonna get away with whatever we let them get away with.

        “Pseudonymous nigger”

        That’s the name of a horse I used to own.

        Like

      • jabowery says:

        Leadership of in one’s personal life is laudable but facing demographic ballot box stuffing and its consequences requires something more than you’ve shown here by implicitly denying the reality of women’s suffrage.

        Whether you are a nigger or not, you may as well be one given your response.

        Like

      • “Whether you are a nigger or not, you may as well be one given your response.”

        What nigger do you know that owns a horse??

        You don’t like my actionable advice for young men to execute leadership in their own, day-to-day lives? No worries. What’s your plan? And don’t say “bitching on teh interwebs”. The whole point of this here Chateau is to bounce ideas off of each other. Even a bad idea might give someone else a good idea.

        Give it a shot. You can do it. Give us an idea.

        Like

    • Also, stop watching (((masterful cinema))).

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Just skimmed through the Wiki – is there a Frankfurt School influence here? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irr%C3%A9versible

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        you obviously are not familiar with gaspar noe

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Cortesar, I can’t tell whether he’s Tribe [I skimmed through his Wiki].

        Can you tell us moar about him?

        Gaspar could be “Casper” which is semitic for “Treasurer”.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casper_%28given_name%29

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        I do not know if he is (((tribal)))
        his filmmaking is original
        underneath the blood and sex in his films I see a Houellebecq-esque sensibility except much more nihilistic much more violent

        Gaspar Noé Explains His Hatred for ‘Black Panther’: ‘I Had to Escape the Cinema After 20 Minutes’

        “I tried ‘Black Panther.’ I escaped from the cinema after 20 minutes,” Noé said. “I thought it was as bad as ‘Star Wars.’ I hated ‘Star Wars.’ I hated the R&B music [in “Black Panther”]. The music was so bad that I had to escape. But you know which one I like? What’s the name of the Denis Villeneuve movie? ‘Arrival.’ That one was good

        https://www.indiewire.com/2018/05/gaspar-noe-hated-black-panther-walked-out-1201965879/
        ——————————————————————————-
        one reason to like the man

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        ???

        Film critic (((David Edelstein))) argues that “Irréversible might be the most homophobic movie ever made.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irréversible

        Sounds good to me.

        Like

      • @ Cap, cort

        No I’m not familiar with him, but I am familiar with (((Hollywood))). Drumming up the value of cinema is just playing right into their frame (heh).

        Im not saying you can’t watch a movie to escape once in a while, but praising a low, uniquely moderin art form such as movies is cringe.

        Is there anything the TV can teach me that the gbfm cannot?

        Like

      • Yo says:

        Yea movies teach the next move
        Thats being Made
        Trail of clue breadcrumbs

        Like

      • Yo says:

        Plus somehow
        We became
        The
        Ideas for movies

        Like

      • Yo says:

        Bastards used a black gunslinger
        Though
        I get it
        To inspire
        Black kids
        Ill take it as
        Props

        Like

      • jabowery says:

        P. K. Griswold, Based on your sage advice, although I hadn’t been following Gaspar Noe’s work lately I discovered he made a 2015 movie “Love” that I suspected would be worthwhile. As it turns out, it delves into Heartistesque themes and does so with limbic writhing intensity one would expect from the creator of “Irreversible”.

        [CH: Noe is great. I have to write movie reviews of his stuff. very game relevant.]

        Like

    • jabowery says:

      I wrote: “Leadership of in one’s personal life is laudable but…”

      P. K. Nigger responds: “You don’t like my actionable advice for young men to execute leadership in their own, day-to-day lives?”

      So you compound your original failure to comprehend the suffrage-relevance of my comment on “mass immigration”, by saying that something I call “laudable” is something I “don’t like”.

      And you expect me to not only believe you’re not a nigger because you claim you own a horse, but to further respond to you so you can further demonstrate you have the reading comprehension of one?

      Like

  13. R.G. Camara says:

    I was once at a bar hitting on a girl, and all was going well. We were sitting at the bar. I got up and told her to watch my seat, I was going to the bathroom. I left my jacket on my seat back and my drink in front of it.

    Came back and some dude had jacked my seat and was hitting on her. We made eye contact, and I didn’t say a word. I was a bit drunk, so all I did was look him in the eye and and waved him off my seat with my hand. He got up, I sat down and continued to hit on her, ignoring the rude interloper. The girl saw the whole thing.

    We ended up banging that night.

    Now, to me it wasn’t a power move. It was a bro code/politeness–clearly it was my seat, with my jacket there and drink guarding it. He had either willfully ignored these things or else was too drunk to notice. In the reverse scenario–which I doubt I would do, since it was so rude—I would have moved when the guy returned, regardless of how small or big he was.

    But to her it was a power move. I am sure it got me the lay that night. her eyes were shining at me when I sat down and went back to working her.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Javier says:

    You need to understand WOMEN HATE BETAS in fact they hate them so much that they would prefer to work soul destroying jobs to support themselves than attach themselves to a Beta provider that wants to fuck them and impregnate them with his shitty beta genetics.

    Liked by 2 people

    • many do go for beta bucks

      Like

    • Aristarchus says:

      Assuming your premises arguendo, the logical solution is polygamy. After all, “shitty” genetics should not be propagated; women do their race a service by avoiding them. Dysgenic, degenerate downbreeding is the death of nations and races.

      If I recall correctly, about 80% of women who have ever lived have reproduced, whereas only about 40% of men have reproduced. Does that sound about right to you?

      Like

      • Yo says:

        Id say look at lions
        Bears look at percent
        And figure that ratio
        Or of course monkeys
        rats
        Figure two alphas per 300
        Two alphas can physically
        Kill
        298 other
        With clubs
        Prob good to have variety
        Though just with our educational
        System’
        It is just so obsolete
        In the face of modern Times
        We should be way past reenacting volcanoes
        For science fair
        I did get ‘research”
        Papers
        Ahhh
        Im supposed to plagerize
        some dudes book
        And because i credit
        Him while plagerizing
        its cool i can get s grade
        Like its my shit

        Like

      • Yo says:

        I guess can father ideas though
        To expand upon
        Didnt have life experience to do that then
        He he he
        Allthough i was inspired
        By writes just not the schools lol

        Like

      • Ironsides says:

        The “beta genetics” argument appears highly shaky to me on logical and evolutionary grounds.

        In the first place, it’s a complete misreading of the way genetics and evolution works to claim that there is a major part of the population that “should” fail to reproduce in a given generation. That’s just not how natural selection works. Fitness isn’t an immense gulf that causes a genocide of major population sections every 30 years.

        Barring massively dysgenic individual mutations like insanity or being born sterile, fitness means traits that give a SLIGHT EDGE in passing down one’s genes, meaning that over a long, long time they may come to predominate — if the conditions that make the trait adaptive persist, and chance doesn’t snuff out the line.

        Having peak fitness doesn’t make the others unfit, either. There can be more fit, and somewhat less fit, but in most circumstances the “less fit” is still fit, and is usually “good enough.” Additionally chance can easily eradicate the more fit. just randomly.

        This is why evolution takes so long — tiny incremental changes with very rare upsets, and constant random chance affecting the whole population pretty much equally.

        Secondly, it’s illogical on its face.that this Alpha genetic victory and Beta total failure is going to happen every generation. The “Beta’s” genes were passed down successfully for many hundreds of generations, meaning that they had ENOUGH fitness to survive, even if they’re not quite as optimal as Chad Thundercock.

        Let’s face it, barring actually defective people like retards, severely deformed individuals, etc., there’s maybe a 5% difference in genetic fitness between Chad Thundercock and Joe Solid the Reliable, Ordinary Family Man.

        Also, I think the absolute chaos, insanity, and weirdness of our current society — which technology and the principle of equality have hit like a bomb — give a somewhat distorted, extreme view of certain things.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Ironsides says:

        TLDR:

        Many “very fit” individuals fail, through chance, to reproduce.

        Many “less fit” individuals succeed in reproducing, through chance.

        Fitness only manifests very slowly over time as slight reproductive advantages gradually add up over many generations; and it remains fragile, capable of being wiped out/derailed by Black Swan events, until it has managed to actually become the species and displace or dominate all other bloodlines, a process requiring hundreds of generations.

        The idea of “catastrophic victory” for Alphas in a genetic sense in a single generation is simply bosh that has no basis in any actual, even partial understanding of how selection works.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Yo says:

        Selection works extremely fast
        If one group
        Exterminates
        Another
        If one race
        Kills all the others
        They become the only
        Choice
        The fittest

        Like

      • Augustus says:

        Unfortunately, the alphas in western society being pushed by the (((media))) are nig nogs and immigrants, while the white man is increasingly being seen as a beta. I have seen more nog-white relationships now than ever before. Sure, a good amount of the white girls are low-tier or fat, but there are some that are 7+ with a tyrone looking nog. Not good.

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        @Ironsides, thanks for the well-thought counterárgument that I almost missed due to the dysǵenically uńfit spamslinger who ran ńóíśé over your signal. “Likes” here are for quality debate, not to signify any agreement.

        I think you may have noticed that I am not a fan of oversimplified explanations; and I certainly wasn’t trying to provide one in a sense of, “all ‘betas’ are uņfit, and must be categorically de-seļected to make way for ‘alpha’ genes”. One of the reasons that I often write 500 word comments is to avoid misunderstandings in what would take at least a 50,000-word booklet to explain in detail; well, that was my attempt at a 50-word comment (well, 65 words, to be precise).

        My reply was to the implicit presumption by Javier that women are violating some sacred men’s right by refusing to propagate “shitty beta genetics” (his words!). That was presumptuous in the extreme. Nobody is enţitled to reproduce: Natural seļection works on the opposite principle.

        That said, I disagree also with your cogent, but still incorrect assessment of the matter. If you look at the Gauśśian distribution (“bełł curve”) of any trait, at least amongst White men, the extremes (on both sides) are far further from the center than you claim!

        For any given measure of fitneess, the top 10% of the population is very far above the mean; and the top 0.01% of the population is of such a different quality that they may as well be of a different species.

        Let’s face it, barring actually defective people like retards, severely deformed individuals, etc., there’s maybe a 5% difference in genetic fitness between Chad Thundercock and Joe Solid the Reliable, Ordinary Family Man.

        “Chad Thundercock” is absolutely the wrong standard here: It is the standard that measures who has the most mostly-sterile seẍ on the “hookup” scene in a soft, ḑeǵenerate society of unbounded coḿfort. Apply instead the standard of what man would imṕregnate the most women either amidst a primitive harsh environment, or in a state of ascending civilization: Those who more or less combine all of the traits of being touǵhest, śmartest, bŕavest, stŕongest, and overall: heaļthiest.

        Correspondingly, natural selection is in fact far haŗsher and more aǵǵressive than you claim. In the priḿitive state of man, a plurality of females and a majority of males do not reṕroduce. My 80%/40% figure was not thrown off the cuff: It was scientific estimate. And though I am always wary of such estimates, this one comports both with common sense, and with what is observed in other species—especially in “K-seļected” species at the top of the food chain. The eagle’s ńest provides a touǵh-löve upbringing!

        Illustrating with some numbers admittedly pulled off the cuff, it can be expected that the top 1% of men will each şire terrifically disproportionate numbers of children—hundreds; or for the top 0.01% of proto-kings and conquerors, thousands!—whereas the next 10% will şire moderately large bŗoods with a few women; about another 30%, the healthiest pack “betas” in the forming social ḩierárchies, will each have a few kids, typically with one ẃoman; and most will ḑîê without offśṕring.

        But note my emphasis on natural selection. Through miļĺennia of civilization, Aryan mankind has replaced natural selection with artificial selection—a haphazard, mostly unthinking artificial selection. This problem is the tiǵer that scientific euǵeņicists first started trying to grasp the mere tail of in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

        This whole discussion reminds me of W. Ļ. Pieŕce’s well-studied and cogently arǵued opinion, q.v., that civilization has reversed evolution, and slowly destroyed the Aryan species by destroying naţural selection. Nature’s cuĺļing is ŕuthless. Men have bŗed themselves soft. And it is ironic that only the species with the śuperior traits that led to civilization could destroy itself by such means. For my own original (I think) analogy, the invention of means to stop ńatural seļection is subtly, perniciously more dangerous than the invention of the aţomic böḿb.

        In lieu of another 5000 or 50,000 words, I had better pause for the moment. But this is a quite important topic, perhaps the most important—and correspondingly, it is the most politically incorrect; for of course, it is to the competitive advantage of the uńfit to declare otherwise, and even advocate a lowest-common-denoḿinator r-seļection strategy. It is the reṕroductive aṕṕlication of the ŚķĺāVenmoral: The ḑemocratic notion that all, or even most men be enţitled to reṕroduce is the ćŕý of those who ţranşvalue weaķness to “virţue”.

        Like

      • TerryThePirate says:

        Under polygamy, some men get multiple women while others get none. Those who get none are easily recruited into terrorist movements.

        Like

    • At least have the decency to h/t the guy who said this quote.

      Like

  15. Strawful says:

    The comments on that reddit post what a KEK.

    “Seeing my man work turns me on. T-that’s it it’s just seeing a hard working man!”
    Plz bitch you reckon any cunts get turned on by their retail worker bf or garbage man working?

    Like

    • Yo says:

      When i lifted the 190
      19 Times
      The ex liked it
      Why did i stop
      On road to
      225 Times so i could show yall
      A block i guess

      Like

    • Yo says:

      Think i want to do it here
      Really can prob do a 100
      Times 225
      Not really a limit i don’t think

      Like

  16. Yo says:

    5 minutes into movie assasination
    It owns

    Like

  17. pelayo1683 says:

    For she looks from a window of her house into the streets; Upon whom she might see among the children; A young man lacking discernment; Passing by near the corner on the pathways of her house; And she speaks in the darkness at evening… ‘I spread my bed with sheets, And covered it with tapestry from Egypt. I sprinkled my bed with saffron; And my house with cinnamon; Come, let us enjoy love until morning; Come, let us embrace in love….

    She makes the heart of young men throb; She is excited and debauched; And her feet do not rest at home; For at times she is outside roaming about…

    And with snares from her lips she compels him. And being cajoled, he follows her; As an ox is led for slaughter; And as a dog to bonds… not knowing he runs for his life… Her house is the road to Hades; Leading down to the chambers of death.

    Proverbs 7.7-27

    Like

  18. Yo says:

    Thinking bout Going with
    Love wins as handle
    I never really was a gunslinger
    Even ini warzone in Iraq only had my hands
    Throughout my life hands and mind vs whatever
    Cept ini army but when it counted even then
    Just hands and mind

    Like

    • Yo says:

      Course i did have a death wish
      Lol
      But also seem to have supernatural
      Help
      When the scooter hit me
      Like out the movie
      Constantine
      Except of course
      I beat the movie
      The antichrist actually
      Got moved by the car
      I didnt move at all
      Talk about being dominant
      he he he

      Like

      • Yo says:

        Walked away from
        3 major car wrecks too
        One no seatbelt
        No scratch
        Seatbelt bruise
        And an ouchie knee for a day or two
        And noone involved
        Was hurt bad either

        Like

      • Yo says:

        55 mules and hour
        Hitting stopped car
        Ouchie knee lol
        For couple days
        Everyone in stopped car gets out and Walks around
        Pure dominance?

        Like

      • Yo says:

        Only one of those me driving
        That chick that wanted me dead
        And my buddy when young
        Was the no seatbelt i destroyed car
        So guess did the destroying car thing before movie lol

        Like

  19. Lichthof says:

    Genuine question for Trav
    You’re one of many reasons to read this blog, you get it, dgaf etc
    But why you bang 3rd world women?
    Are western white women in your world just not worth the squeeze?

    Like

  20. Lichthof says:

    I mentioned before the docu ‘Hitler’s Children ‘.
    It’s from 2000. On jootube its called ‘Hitler Youth’
    3 partner

    Now even if you hate the nahzees it is essential viewing for white boys and shits all over society today
    Some great lines in there
    ‘Only real men have the strength to deal with this hostile world’ JG

    Boys must be aggressive and powerful
    Learn how to fight, fly planes, ski, fence

    Overcome our “natural laziness”

    Its actually a kosher made docu with evil music but it backfires

    Like

  21. fleezer says:

    “The worst a man can do sexually — rape a woman — pales in the scope of its evil to the worst that a woman can do sexually — cuckold a gullible loving man into unwittingly raising a child not his own for the duration of his life.”

    disagree.

    one man can rule over a tribe or even nation that has customs of forced breeding and human trafficking

    the worst evil a cult leader like that can do is far worse than the cuckolding of beta fools that the average woman can achieve

    men own the extremes in every human activity, which includes sexuality and evil

    behind every strong man is… the bitch he allows to kneel there

    Like

    • Yo says:

      One woman can break a trillion hearts

      Like

    • Yo says:

      Your so wrong
      Any woman can have sex for longer
      Than any man
      Men have a time limit
      Men can only fuck so many woman
      A woman can fuck a thousand men on a day
      Or what was the high count?

      Woman killed more than 1.5 billion babies
      In like 38 years that were in their own Belly
      There own babies
      More than have died in all wars’
      So the most evil

      Not true on men holding the extremely
      On every human activity
      Not even on killing their children
      Men cant even competition with woman
      When the men trying to kill each other with
      Every means posible including nukes

      Like

      • Yo says:

        The chick that said i hate white
        Boys then wrecked into metal
        Telephone pole on my side
        Trying to kill me
        My reward for having
        One of the most fun nights
        Ever dancing and just
        Wild as fuck
        She was blong hot as fuck
        But i never fucked her
        We had gone out a bit
        But yea tried to kill me cause
        Couldnt have me as sex slave
        She got away with it
        Now what man gonna get away
        With that with a chick
        Chicks are more extreme
        And
        They don’t get punished
        Even for killing their babies
        Or attempted murder
        Soooo uhhhh
        Who running this world
        Without having the responsability

        Like

    • Yo says:

      Theres a dirty secret noone wants to talk about
      Woman are the rulers
      Men have been the Slaves
      Men been getting human trafficked
      By woman for probably forever
      Course men wouldnt want to admit
      That we are the weaker
      Sex
      But is what it is

      Like

  22. Captain Obvious says:

    Rahm Emanuel told Trump to ‘sit this one out’ http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3738134/posts

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      It was all artificially manufactured to be Rahm’s “Sister Souljah” moment.

      Give Rahm that Gravitas.

      Put the hebe on the 2020 ticket.

      Like

    • Amon Ra says:

      In a sane world a lowly Mayor ordering a president to ” ‘sit this one out’ “, would result in an unfortunate accident for the Mayor. However, we live in a
      ((( clown world ))).

      Like

  23. icutrauma11 says:

    I work in an Emergency Room and when a pt codes it’s no shit time. A few times I’ve had to look people in the face, raise my voice and launch specific orders to be done and right now, shut up stop talking and do it. Afterwards I can remember the girls talking about how they never saw that side, fanning their faces and wanted to see more.

    Like

    • Yo says:

      More proof woman rule
      Men
      Prob get paid same

      But yea sounds like
      U are a crisis manager
      People that can handle that
      Should have that on job title
      And get paid extra

      Like

    • Little Miss Muffet says:

      Ooooo what a man. My clit is tingling

      Like

  24. damnd says:

    just saw this cartoon on youtube. it has a chilling premise to a frightful tale. but sjw’s are only terrorised by its offending content

    Like

  25. Lichthof says:

    Red pill moment but having (any?) values and morals will crush your soul
    What never ceases to amaze me is that immigrants from countries of oppressive regimes or those that have suffered at the hands of (((American Imperialism))) will quite happily support said regimes/imperialism if the price is right
    I have met Eastern Europeans who ‘escaped the tyrannical oppressive regime of c0mmunism’ but quite then happy to go to Kabul to work as an architect.

    El Salvadorans whose country suffered at the hands of Re@gan backed de@th squads but quite happy to then join the US Army.
    Palestinians whose region the k1kes have bombed but then quite happy to provide translation services to the US @rmy.
    Plane Z0G will always have a happy band of foot soldiers.

    If they bomb somewhere like Luxembourg next week there will hardly be a murmur of protest as most will seek any opportunities that may arise.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. damnd says:

    test:
    nigger ghey cunt

    Like

  27. aye says:

    One of my most irritating memories is of a Cpl (British military, so Cpl=Sgt in Burger terms) in my training Coy bringing sluts (usually Polish) back to the trainee soldiers barracks late at night because he briefly had to “do some paperwork”.

    Fact he was trying to take advantage of his status as an instructor over his – “Fuck up, you’re out. Piss us off, you’re out.” recruits – wasn’t lost on him or us.

    We (as we were obliged to do) obviously braced up to him/snapped to attention as you have to in training, and those cunts were always wet as fuck.

    Fact many of us could have murdered him easily in a (rank doesn’t matter, 1 on 1) punchup didn’t matter – he had rank/dominance and the rest of us (50 odd) had to show him respect.

    Her (whatever Slav whore he was bringing back) man was asserting dominance and we (forced to by org we’d chosen to join) were acknowledging that.

    Irritating memory, but I can’t help but respect the prick.

    Like

  28. Brendan says:

    “Bill, do me a favor and call the house around 8 PM. I’m gonna pretend to yell at you, but just ignore it. My cunt wife eats it up.”

    Like

  29. Little Miss Muffet says:

    Ooooo I got so horny with the gina tingles and was dripping wet when my boyfriend told his dog to sit.

    [CH: is that how he talks to you?]

    Like

Leave a Reply