Feed on

Minnesota’s 5th district is:
•67% White
•17% Black
•9% Hispanic
•6% Asian
•1% Native American

Congresswoman @IlhanMN won with 78% of the vote

What are your values for you to single out an already marginalized Somali minority? Why won’t you leave anti-Black racism? https://t.co/WmOI2TJ7z6

— Qasim Rashid, Esq. (@MuslimIQ) February 13, 2019

Interesting, but also misleading.

First, those numbers are a little off. In district MN-5 (Minneapolis):

Whites: 65%
Hispanics: 10%

Minor quibble. The bigger flaws are as follows:

How are Somalis classified? If they fall into the MENA category, then MN likely classifies them as White (as ludicrous as that sounds), which would undercount the total black population of MN-5.

WIkiheebia states there are 80,000 Somalis in Minnesota as of 2016. Assume most of them live in Minneapolis. If they were misclassified as MENA White, a corrected classification would boost MN-5’s black population to 28% of the total and reduce the White fraction to 54%.

(Reminder that Somali “refugees” in MN have stolen millions in welfare scams.)

But we don’t know how they’re classified. (My preferred racial classification method, and the one which most closely hews to the natural world, is to save the “White” designation for native European stock and their diaspora. Hungary — yes. Armenia — no. Russia — pale gray area.)

Not to mention how many illegal Somalis voted and are missed in census counts. I would bet that 65% White number is considerably inflated.

Next, raw district population ratios only fill in part of the picture. We’d need to know the racial breakdown of those who actually went out and voted in Omar’s MN-5 election. If a district is 65% White but only, say, 50% of those Whites voted, and 100% of nonWhites voted, then Omar wouldn’t need a majority of the White vote to win. She could coast on the nonWhite vote.

This is true for any district race. Don’t get fooled by district racial composition. You want the racial composition of those who voted. They probably align percentage-wise, but they may not. Always check.

You can see how a deeper analysis of voting behavior would clarify if MN-5 Whites are unfathomably cucked or just irretrievably cucked.

Anyhow, the point of this exercise isn’t to deny the existence of Scandicucks. It’s well known by anyone with a pulse nowadays that half the White race is cucked and has orgasms voting for nonWhites. The fact that a load of deracinated shitlib Whites in the poorest (or second poorest) district in Minnesota voted along with a load of tribalistic, super-racinated browns and blacks for the black candidate doesn’t disprove the Diversity + Proximity = War equation, nor does it refute the basic premise that nonWhites vote tribally (and cucked Whites join them to signal their lack of tribalism).

Yes, there are a lot of CuckWhites who will immiserate their posterity tomorrow for a good feeling today.

PS Minnesota has a voter ID law called vouching which is ripe for abuse.

(4) having a voter who is registered to vote in the precinct, or an employee employed by and working in a residential facility in the precinct and vouching for a resident in the facility, sign an oath in the presence of the election judge vouching that the voter or employee personally knows that the individual is a resident of the precinct. A voter who has been vouched for on election day may not sign a proof of residence oath vouching for any other individual on that election day. A voter who is registered to vote in the precinct may sign up to eight proof-of-residence oaths on any election day.

Crazy. No doubt, this is why MN has the highest voter turnout in the nation: it’s called voter fraud. One voter could vouch for up to eight people to vote, no SSN required. A valid address is needed, but that can be easily circumvented, and is something MN officials never check.


Comments are closed.