Feed on
Posts
Comments

It’s no mystery who among Whites supports open borders and the consequent swamping of America with Swarth World spindrift: Single White Women.

As I teased in the previous post, here I’ll explain why Single White Women (SWWs) are in love with the idea of a borderless America that is overrun with Dirt World detritus. I call it the Shiny Object Theory of the SWW Open Borders Welcoming Committee.

My reasoning is simple: sexual selection electrifies all human interaction, and women have evolved to display themselves to catch the attention of high value men.

The fewer high value men there are, and/or the more attractive women there are, the more frequent and intense the sexual display of women. Supply and demand. So, for instance, when men are in short supply, as has been hypothesized was the situation for prehistorical European hunter-gatherers with high male attrition rates from hunting megafauna, the few surviving men are able to afford to be choosy, and they choose only the most beautiful of women from their tribes.

It’s speculated that this is how blonde and red hair, and blue and green eyes, evolved in European White women…a long time ago those choosy men had to be enticed with the biological equivalent of shiny baubles, so women evolved bright, eye-catching accoutrements like blonde hair, blue eyes, big titties, swayback, and exquisite White woman facial beauty.

White male choosiness gave the world White female beauty. God may have made man in His image, but White man made White woman in his vision.

Getting back to the subject of this post, if we start with the premise that the number of high value White Men has decreased relative to the number of Single White Women who want them — a premise which has sound footing, given the surge of economically self-sufficient White women and the retreat of White men from positions of power, influence, and cultural supremacy to languish in faptivity — then there would consequently develop an increase in sexual display by White women to more effectively bait HSMV White men into relationships (or at least into pump and dumps).

Subcultures would spring from this sexual market shift in female strategy, such as Slut Pride, Deep Thots, multicolored hair, skintight yoga pants showing camel toe, wine mommery, and the omnipresent social media attention whore.

One other negative externality would be apparent: SWWs agitating for more Twerk World trash, because nothing sparkles quite as brightly as a diamond in the dirt.

Sweden is overflowing with pretty blondes, so any one blonde doesn’t stand out much (which is probably why the brunette hair color was evolutionarily retained in European White women). Similarly, America was once 90% White (a mere fifty years ago), but its homogeneity and pride of heritage also meant there were a lot of relatively hsmv White men to go around. Back then, SWWs didn’t have to viciously compete for a shrinking pool of hsmv White men.

Today, they do, and these SWWs competing for fewer hsmv White men see open borders as a short cut to standing out in a rapidly muddying crowd. That mousy, stringy-haired sandy blonde plain jane with the muffin top might not be a catch in 90% White America, but she’s a fucking princess bathed in ethereal light in 40% Earth Tone America.

The contrast of hordes of (to White men not named ¡Jeb!) sexually invisible squatamalans relieves the pressure on Mediocre Mauves to signal their sexual readiness or to compete in a losing battle with naturally prettier girls. Thanks to the magic of polychromatic patriotism, the middle of the belle curve SWWs can reap the reward of more hsmv White man attention without incurring any of the responsibility to look and act more pleasingly feminine.

Of course, as I’ve argued, female beauty is objective, universally agreed upon, and biometrically standardized. A millimeter here, a millimeter there, according to God of Biomechanics spec, can mean the difference between involuntary solitude and catching the eye of President Trump. So White men aren’t going to start believing HB5s are HB9s. But that doesn’t matter; what matters is perception. And if even hsmv White men perceive their menu of minxes disappearing under a gloomy tide of boner-killing brown, they might start to consider the romantic appeal of the White HB5s.

These White men won’t be happy, but if the perceived alternative is a tubular desert trekker then they’ll settle for the White HB5 and make a go of it. And comparative beauty isn’t Fake News; we’ve all noticed that a blah girl will look more bangable when she’s standing next to a fug. It’s a trick of the male brain that ensures the human species doesn’t stop in its tracks when the supply of beauties dips below the threshold at which the majority of men feel they have a chance.

Paradoxically, the American obesity epidemic that has gone worldwide in the past two decades may be partly fueling SWW clit boners for rapefugees, by providing fat White women an even less desirable horde of females against which to compare favorably, because the Third World peasantry invading America is increasingly Girth World peasantry.

There really is no end to the ways in which closed border homogeneous White nations are more romantically appealing than open border diversitopias, so make it your life’s work to shame any SWW who shrieks with vitriolic virtue about the blessings of Diversity™. She is literally advocating for the death of your dating life.

112 Responses to “The Shiny Object Theory Of White Female Support For Open Borders”

  1. Jaded Jurist says:

    Was just explaining the definition of “solipsism” to my wife and how the definition often applies to women.

    Her response: “I don’t think mothers are like that”.

    I think a mic drop is in order here.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Captain Obvious says:

      There’s no question but that the single ch!ldless female’s neural-circuitry for Cluster-B/Histrionic-Narcissistic proclivities [“Hey Mr Stud Muffin, Pay Attention to me Me ME ME!!!“] is being overheated and fried by the amount of attention that they are receiving on Scr0tial Media via the iPhag.

      Womyn simply cannot put down their iPhags & the dopamine rush they get from receiving attention.

      Like

    • >>> “I don’t think mothers are like that”

      Recently, I helped a professional woman’s son make a choice of college to attend, and I was saying to her that, in making the decision, first & foremost I would key in on the cuteness & cheerfulness of the coeds.

      And instead of hearing any guffawing or righteous indignation out of her, she immediately clued in on what I was talking about.

      As it ended up, she kinda steered her boy away from her own Alma Mater, because the chicks there were fat and ugly and obviously dour & unhappy, and they ended up settling on a school out in the midwest, which none of her family had ever attended.

      And after they visited that particular school, she sent me an email and said that they went home and immediately made the deposit/downpayment on the tuition [to reserve his slot in the freshman class] and that that school had had far & away the prettiest and friendliest coeds of any school they visited.

      Like

  2. […] The Shiny Object Theory Of White Female Support For Open Borders […]

    Like

  3. Jaded Jurist says:

    yeah, another pic got m0dd3d. A wholesome pic, no less. Le sigh.

    Like

  4. mendo says:

    That mousy, stringy-haired sandy blonde plain jane with the muffin top might not be a catch in 90% White America, but she’s a fucking princess bathed in ethereal light in 40% Earth Tone America.

    Even if MuffinTop is getting plowed regularly by the EarthToners, isn’t she seething or somewhat depressed that she cannot obtain the ShitlordChad that sends tingles up her spine? Or does the boning take care of that for her?

    It’s akin to the girl that cheats with some schlub to make the man she’s interested in jealous, only for said man to not have any clue.

    Like

    • The bottom line is that any time the male:female ratio moves much above 1.0, the behavior of huge swaths of females quickly disintegrates into s0d0m/g0morrah/caligula levels of depravity, because there are always fallback options [in the form of Beta Bucks & Incel Gammas] just waiting for the women.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Agent X says:

      The problem is the gorilla-bull DOES send tinglez up her spine because 99% of white boys can’t make her feel that way. (((whomst))) do you think its responsible for the “black men have big penises” meme (most are as average as Europeans). The average soqquer mom used to boring beta male sex positively squirms at the idea of some bulldozer-IQ bull practically tearing her clit out and cramping her hips for a month.

      They aren’t look at us wonder why they can only get nogz. They want the nogz.

      Liked by 3 people

      • trav777 says:

        riiiiight…it’s just jew programming, all powerful jew programming, as opposed to the fact that niggers have some musculature and are willing to fight and tell women wtf to do instead of placating them…

        Liked by 1 person

  5. Trump signed an executive order to keep “families” together.

    This is going to need mach1negun turrets, not just a wall.

    Liked by 1 person

    • SpookNukem says:

      In b4 lolberals realize that this means kids will be detained longer, and start another trail of crocodile tears.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Corinth Arkadin says:

        That muff diver Rachel Madcow started crying, so it’s The God Emperor’s way of neutralizing the narrative and nothing really will change.
        Personally, instead of crying I think that muff diver should be driven to wet her pantsuit on camera.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Agent X says:

        They already did, its the headline on Fox like two hours ago. Now they’re howling at the executive order because was Trump was like LOLZ now the little tortilla chips can spend 7 months in Federal lockup with their parents.

        what’s the term ’round here? lzzozlzozolzozlz.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Dread Forman says:

      Well, duh. I’ve been opposed to a wall for two reasons:
      1) Deer and all the other animals need to migrate.
      2) Beaners will travel 1000s of miles, they’re going to climb a stupid wall.

      They’re not bulletproof. Word gets back to beanerville that it’s shoot on sight and they will stop trying to come.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Corinth Arkadin says:

        The wall will slow them down long enough for a bead to be drawn on them.
        Employ former United States Marines with an M-1. It worked at Belleau Wood.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Dread Forman says:

        I wonder what will happen when they pull the rug out from under the $USD.

        Like

      • Agent X says:

        1. The Wall isn’t supposed to be un-climbable. Its supposed to slow them down. And some of the designs were found by spec ops to be damn hard to climb.

        2. The wall is supposed to be an instrumentation platform to locate beaner commerce and allow interception. Radar doesn’t shoot down planes, limited batteries of missiles directed by radar coverage do.

        3. This our fucking castle goddammit and castles have walls.

        Like

      • Dread Forman says:

        We don’t need some spendy project that’s gonna do jack all.

        A wall will mean nothing without laws that protect the country and we need to remove the incentives that draw them here. And with protectionist policies and zero incentives, wtf would we need a wall for?

        Like

    • Trump is smart. He knows that the main thing leading up to the midterms is to get the spying scandals out in front.

      So he will pour maximum water on this little immigration fire – as he has done – so that when the Awan trial comes up (and other scandals), it can grab more eyeballs.

      50 Democrat members of Congress hired the Awans without requiring them to undergo the normal background check. Why? Irresponsible?

      The Awans turn out to be Pakistani spies, thieves, fraudsters and blackmailers and they massively compromise US national security.

      Each of those 50 members of Congress can enjoy explaining that to his constituents once the local campaign ads start. Kids in cages will be ancient history. Trump has his eye on the ball.

      Oh, and “Dems love MS13” will provide some great mom-centric campaign ads too, I should think.

      Liked by 4 people

  6. Chadimir Putin says:

    Holy shit Trump pulled your Skittles move on Merkel at the G-7 only it was Starburst. Trump confirmed as Chateau reader and greatest world leader of all time in one fell swoop.

    http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-gave-angela-merkel-starbursts-at-the-g7-summit-2018-6

    Liked by 4 people

  7. I can confirm that the SWWs on my social media are the ones REEEing hardest about muh children seperated from their families. But interestingly, they’re being ignored, relatively speaking. There is so much real talk out in the open now it boggles the mind. The cultural shift and the destruction of the PC narrative is more important than any law or policy (although those are following suit thanks to Don). Blackpillers get out

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      “The cultural shift and the destruction of the PC narrative is more important than any law or policy”

      This.

      In just the three short years from June 2015 to June 2018, it feels like we have gutted substantial portions of the monopoly which the Frankfurt School has had on public opinion [and public discourse] for the last 75 or 80 years.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Agent X says:

      I noticed that too. I didn’t even jump in the trenches on this one because the flood of “muh mini tacos” wasn’t even getting that much support or response. People are tired of beaners and most of all legitimate Americans who have hispanic descent and love their country.

      You see that you liberal fucks? That’s the difference. Besides the Spanish are white too.

      Like

      • Feral Sigma says:

        People are tired of beaners and most of all legitimate Americans who have hispanic descent and love their country.

        I was riding in a Uber driven by a Mexican-American dude just a few days ago and boy was he pissed about this whole thing–not about the justifiable treatment of the wetback invaders, mind you, but about the communist media spinning it like the wets were the victims. He just kept saying “What about the parents? Don’t they bear any of the responsibility for this? They were the ones who decided to break in here illegally!”

        Like

      • Frank Gappa says:

        I travel a lot and frequently encounter taxi and uber drivers that claim they are “Trump” supporters. This is usually BS as it is the best method to get a good tip. They feel you out first by asking some basic bitch questions about politics and then they pour on the MAGA if they realize you are a supporter. $$$

        Like

      • Feral Sigma says:

        I travel a lot and frequently encounter taxi and uber drivers that claim they are “Trump” supporters. This is usually BS as it is the best method to get a good tip. They feel you out first by asking some basic bitch questions about politics and then they pour on the MAGA if they realize you are a supporter. $$$

        He never asked me any questions before commenting to me on a radio segment about the issue that was playing on the car’s radio. His opinion was genuine.

        Like

  8. Amon Ra says:

    In honor of Trump’s “loving” decision not to separate families. I present to you the following stories.

    First a a loving photo montage of the “families” invading the nation.

    http://www.standeyo.com/NEWS/18_Pics_of_Day/180619.pic.of.day.html

    Like

  9. Amon Ra says:

    Next, a few tidbits.

    – Child Border Crossers Enjoy Nearly 3X Higher Standard of Living than Average Middle Class American Children –

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/19/child-border-crossers-enjoy-nearly-3x-higher-standard-of-living-than-average-middle-class-american-children/

    Liked by 2 people

    • Libertardian says:

      Shitlibs have pivoted so quickly to “family detention REEEEEE” that you know they had the campaign all planned out beforehand.

      My guess is, Trump gave in on the family separation issue to give libs another opportunity to reveal themselves as lunatics who cannot be appeased, reasoned or negotiated with. They’re obliging him.

      Meanwhile the public name-calling keeps getting more openly unhinged. The other day one of them called Melania a “feckless piece of shit” and now they’re calling Nielsen a “gash” and calling for Barron to be put in a cage with child predators. Breitbart can hardly keep up with their insanity any more.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        >>> “they had the campaign all planned out beforehand”

        They’re having to sh00t their wad prematurely because Peter Strzok couldn’t keep his mouf shut with his M0ssad Honey Trap.

        They would have preferred to have held off on this particular Psychological Warfare Initiative for a few more months, but the IG report forced them to move up the timetable.

        Just like the Access Hollyweird tape in 2016, which they were forced to release prematurely.

        Liked by 1 person

      • elooie says:

        We need to do what Hungry does put all of them in a “buffer” zone just inside our border where they can stay until their cases are up to be heard or freely go back into mexico and or where ever they are from. Don’t arrest them as long as they are there but then take a decade to process their case.

        Liked by 1 person

  10. Anonymous says:

    This. Not a chance SWW would be pro open borders if the immigrants were mostly Eastern Euro hotties.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Amon Ra says:

      I make that point to anyone that cares to listen. If the US was being over run by the Chinese, as we are currently are by everyone, mainly “Latinos”. The Spanglish community would be up in arms yelling about neighborhood gentrification, how the Chinese don’t want to learn English, and are taking all the jobs. All this talk about immigration reform is bull*shit and self serving. The various groups just want to import the people that are “closest” to them and don’t give a damn about any other groups, especially the white men. Sadly, this is also the first groups all the other races / cultures will gang up on first, before turning on each other. If the white man survives the first couple of onslaughts his position will become easier, as the other factions wont be able to resist the urge to draw blood from each other, based on military historical precedence, and the nature of their respective cultures / societies.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Libertardian says:

      Yep. When they see beta bux going after asian waifus, then they start REEEing about “yellow fever”. Same reason they want sexbots banned – gotta keep that $pigot open.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Amon Ra says:

    ” The darker effect of the weaponizing of the racial oppression dialectic, however, is that ever-larger numbers of non-whites are internalizing this propaganda and are acting it out in increasingly violent ways. As the people of Europe are colonized by African and Middle Eastern migrants—75% of whom are fighting-age males—and their governments implement laws to crush any criticism of the native Europeans’ dispossession, and as the rest of the West also fervently tries to dissolve itself through an abandonment of principles and mass Third World immigration, when this all comes to a head, it’s going to be very, very ugly.

    We may even be witnessing an extinction-level event. ”

    https://republicstandard.com/goose-step-blues-millions-dead-white-people/

    Like

  12. oink says:

    The Shitty Abject Theory Of White Female Support For Open Borders

    ftfy. Men lead

    Like

  13. Robert What? says:

    @CH, so your theory is that the SWW are more interested in importing the brown women than the brown men?

    Like

    • Agent X says:

      I don’t think he delineates…..its just a sea of trash to look all the better in. And if some big, interesting, handsome swarth comes in and grabs her pussy even better.

      Like

  14. PA says:

    A steep curve represents young SWW’s real reasons for championing brown world immigration:

    To be a shiny bright object: 100%

    To enjoy culinary artifacts of brown culture: 35%

    To get back at the White Chad who banged her in college: 15%

    To get back at the White Chad who ignored her in high school: 12%

    To enjoy musical artifacts of brown culture: 10%

    To entertain amorous advances of brown men: 7%
    [100% with women over the age of 40 or over 220 lbs]

    To have sex with brown men: 3%
    [95% per age/weight exception above]

    To have a brown baby: 0%

    Liked by 1 person

    • PA says:

      More esoteric reasons include:

      “Let them eat cake” – hoping that restless and thus potentially dangerous lower-SMV White men are pacified by abundant squatemalan women (since those damn betas are too uppity to just be gay and leave me alone)

      “What’s the point of being rich if everyone can afford nice things?” – creating artificial mass-misery to better ascertain who are the high-status White men; ie., ones who have the resources and connections to live above diversity.

      Like

    • Deplorable American says:

      PA for comment of the week.

      SWW demand p1mp hand at the societal level aka patriarchy.

      Like

  15. CalvinDecline says:

    Who is “Popcorn Out” and how is he reading my mind?

    <blockquote”Women crave attention and validation like men crave sex.”

    I was thinking about this on the way home today, and read this post thinking “yeah this goes right along with that”.

    Then I read CH’s previous post, peak thirst, and saw this comment. Maybe it was something in the news today that triggered this conclusion?

    It really makes sense though when you think about it. So many women on dating websites are merely window shopping. Some will respond and actually try to talk… but most just sort of goad you on with one word non-responses. It truly is tiring, but also, illuminating.

    The attention dating websites afford many women is juuuuuust enough to make them say “meh, I feel loved… I’ll stay in tonight” in exactly the same way a guy who just released his load to some porn thot thinks “meh… why bother going out?”

    Like

    • trav777 says:

      most of them are on there to feed their egos to get matches. They will never do anything about it.

      Many are hookers. Then there are the 30-somethings who cannot find a man and don’t know why. Like last night some 36yo I asked for a drink at like 10p and she said it was too late and anyone who wanted to go out with her should give her a few days’ lead time. Like wtf…who does she think she is? Look in the mirror hon. Delusional self-appraisal. Still thinks she’s in charge and can command her destiny.

      If women are not told what to do they will simply fuck it all up, their societies, and their lives.

      Like

  16. traitors first says:

    @CH
    “She is literally advocating for the death of your dating life.”

    “She is literally advocating for the death of your RACE (and her dad’s race or like goodbye america post Fu<k you Grandpa)

    Like

  17. ET Jones says:

    A fly in your ointment is that most Central American men are about 5’4″ on average.

    Like

  18. Eli says:

    I remember a blonde stripper saying she preferred to work in a club where she stood out, as opposed to a mostly White club.

    She was about a 7. So this theory is plausible, especially for average looking White women.

    Like

  19. There is a biggish-budget movie that came out in 2017 called “The Shape of Water” that plays on this female interest in the shiny object and immigration.

    It says on IMDB that it costs $20m but that is bullshit. Anyway It has a well known beaner director – everything is directed by streetshitters and beaners now – featuring plenty of established actors and is an open borders piece directed right at the stupidity and self absorption of women.

    The story is too convoluted and ludicrous to easily summarize but it concerns an ugly deaf mute beaner who works alongside feisty black women as a cleaner in a secret military establishment in the control of evil, crude, unattractive and sexually importunate white men. who have wives and attractive white children and live – they are so evil! – in a well-ordered 1950s-style suburbia, Disgusting.

    The plain-faced beaner cleaner’s simple heart is moved by the plight of the captive reptilian (who is scaley and has gills but has the body of an Olympian gymnast) and she soons comes to understand that “we are all alike” and nobody should be held in captivity and she and the amphibian fall in love.

    She decides to save and release the amphibian (which is from South America) , from the military facility (where the sub-plot is that evil Russians are also trying to obtain control of the the amphibian) and attempts to do so with the help of a sensitive and artistic homosexual friend who, like the coons in the show, is terribly oppressed by bigoted white people.

    In short, the most retarded and obvious agitprop you can imagine that touches every possible Globohomo talking point.

    If you are a plain, still-on-the-shself 3 or 4 with an aching cave for a cunt, this movie tells you that mass immigration is one sure way for you to get some cock of your own, even of the cock will be a bit strange or foreign-looking.

    How did it go at the box office? $63 m in the US and $194m worldwide. Scored 7.4 on IMDB. Apparently there is plenty of lonely, yawning snatch out there.

    Like

  20. cortesar says:

    murrica in 3 tweets

    #1

    This is what happens when a government believes people are “illegal.”

    Kids in cages. pic.twitter.com/OAnvr9cl3P

    — Jose Antonio Vargas (@joseiswriting) June 12, 2018

    Like

  21. Dude says:

    Trumpenkrieg live in Duluth right now. He just dropped Strock(I don’t know how to spell it, fuck it.)and Page’s name. I know he’s done it on twitter but this seems a little different.

    Like

  22. cortesar says:

    we have seen a lot but this goes beyond comprehension far beyond
    t these are the animals invading Europe

    Body of ‘raped dog’ found inside Greek refugee camp. https://t.co/70ahYx370N

    — Stefan Molyneux (@StefanMolyneux) June 21, 2018

    Like

  23. Publius says:

    Death of my dating life?

    More importantly, no chance, at all, for my white son to have one.

    Like

    • oink says:

      son? Simplicio?!?

      SonS and daughterS, why does Maitre bust his chops?

      Or, are you an … gasp … apostate?

      Like

  24. tteclod says:

    CH: am I the only one who immediately thought of this?

    Liked by 1 person

  25. BrachaBenedicta says:

    But of course, advocate for the acceptance of beautiful Afrikaner girls or Eastern European girls as refugees and watch that SWWengusuasm plummet.

    Apocalypse can’t come fast enough.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. bigjohn33 says:

    White women cannot be this evil. They cannot be so short-sighted and selfish as to subject their kin and their descendents to the horrors of diversity for a modest and fleeting SMV boost.

    They are just stupid and shallow. Like most of their political and ideological views they haven’t thought it through. At all. It’s all feels. They have a natural female nurturing instinct which has been neglected and warped by childlessness and manipulated by Jews to be directed at outgroups.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Vagina dominator says:

      Yeh. You have summed it up.

      Like

    • Agent X says:

      Okay, so bible-tard time but you should read Genesis. Women were cursed.

      And I’ll bet you’ve never heard those verses preached in sunday school. It literally translates to “you will be hypergamous”

      Or the verses that say “their women rule over them” in the list of a line of curses.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Jaded Jurist says:

      Great comment and great responses.

      I’m trying to find the hypergamy aspect but I’m not seeing it. Are you talking about the Gen 3:16 curse?

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Thank you, bigjohn33… the male hamsters have been running overtime on this wheel when the answer is the simple and very sharp razor of Ockkam.

      And I’d be VERY interested in the Bible lesson in re cursing women to be hypergamous… the only curse I know of in Genesis is that Eve, and her kind, will be subordinate to their men and bear children in pain,

      Genesis 3:16
      To the woman he said, “I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.”

      Due to the idiosyncracies of language and translation, to understand that verse better, there are two schools.

      One says the verse is better understood to mean the woman will desire to dominate her man, but he will rule over her, hence this is a curse… simple desire, as we connote it, for a woman for her man would not be a curse.

      Another school, one which may actually make more sense, says that, rather than desiring first and foremost a relationship towards God, woman will be relegated to wanting only a strong relationship to her man. In the grand scheme of Biblical outlook between the sexes, and women being the “weaker vessel”, this makes logical sense, especially since God made Adam, but women He made by taking an actual part of Adam. And setting her desire towards mere Man rather than God (as Man is designed, when perfect), the idea of this being a curse makes sense… ESPECIALLY when it’s a mere man that she is enthralled to, rather than the Most High Creator.

      As far as the curse upon disobedient Israel, that women and children shall rule over them, and their rulers lack wisdom and discernment, I’ve laid that verse on the chateau several times already, but it has nothing to do with a curse on women, it’s God’s way of letting unruly nations know how to spot the signs of their self-inflicted woes.

      Like

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        That last paragraph exactly. It’s up there with Rom 1:26 (one of those rare times the NIV improves upon the KJV):

        “…God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones”.

        Liked by 1 person

  27. Marc says:

    Well if the oppressive white male gaze created blond and red hair and blue and green eyes, what Cthulhuian evolutionary process led to the pulchritude of negritude?

    Like

    • Tam the Bam says:

      A life of uncompletative idleness, waiting to be mounted by any passing buck or gang thereof, while grubbing up random tubers and lizards in the eternal warm sunshine where WINTER-CHAN is unknown.

      In that environment there are few consequences (apart from early death due to congenital stupidity/being eaten by leopards/starvation, after your innumerable and fatherless spawn have in turn pooed out another vast generation of hapless locusts, mean age 14).

      tl;dr r-selection.

      Just turn off the welfare/electric/heating/water/mechanical transport/free food/healthcare. Let’s see how the idiot-peoples fare then. Fimbulwinter is coming, along with .. war. The river foaming with much blood, as the sibyl of Cumae foretold.
      Just us and the gooks left after, I reckon.

      Like

  28. baked georgia says:

    white males always try to create a certain equilibrium between individual goals and society goals. there’s no such thing for women, their solipsism is simply too strong

    Like

    • trav777 says:

      You wanna see solipsism? Lol…I dumped this chick the other day and during the last text convo I asked her, “[so I should] fall down and worship the ground you walk on just bc you have a vagina?”

      Her response was “…you should.”

      Women LITERALLY believe the entire universe orbits around their pussy. Each and every one of them. It is the most valuable thing ever to exist, despite the presence of 3.5B other mostly identical ones on this planet. Nothing you could ever offer or do can compare to it.

      The ex is gone because she demanded – not asked for – children and m@rr!ge. Hmm…the former I’m on the fence, but the latter? WTF is in it for me in that? Oh wait, yeah, her pussy. You sign a contract with the state (who can and will change the terms ad hoc, post facto) exposing you to literally unlimited loss risk…a naked short on your life…and in exchange, you get what? I have no clue why any man in the USA would do this anymore.

      Like

  29. Major7 says:

    Hey CH, can you pull some strings with the Mod Emperor

    Like

  30. williamk says:

    After a girl gets pumped and dumped a couple times, she subconsciously understands that her value has been irrevocably lowered. To ease the cognitive dissonance, she grasps for an ideology which will allow her to rationalize that she is not low value. So she finds liberalism.

    The core of her embrace of liberalism is the non-judgmentalism. You can’t label anything as lesser value, whether it be mud immigrants, or gays, or fat people, etc. Because a world that allows such value judgments will eventually get around to calling her a slut. And her deepest fear is that world might be right.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Roy says:

      Brilliant. That is precisely why the need male leadership. Without they’re like Tasmanian Devils from looney tunes, destroying everything good on their frenzied quest for novelty.

      Like

  31. Gil says:

    Cue:

    “Give me just one generation of youth, and I’ll transform the whole world.” – Lenin.

    Like

  32. Bo Jangles. says:

    Blue eyes happen randomly in nature. What changed was mating practices(more dedication less promiscuity) Look at how many domesticated animals have blue eyes..siamese, dalmations etc. Farming caused higher selectivity and less promiscuity. But both have their downsides..swarthy have more genetic diversity, the blood lines have more negative inbred problems. Interestingly being inbred apparently makes their parentage obvious.

    Like

  33. chris says:

    This strategy by white women would just spur white men into Eastern European women’s arms. (Why pair up with a traitorous Anglo/Western white woman.)

    Like

  34. KermitTheeFrog777 says:

    Would Some Young Guy care to write a Jeff Foxworthy-esque sketch called,

    “You Might Be A Single White Woman If…” ?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion