Feed on
Posts
Comments

Peak Hug

From the #MeTooPlease vault:

In wake of Matt Lauer’s firing, NBC reportedly cracks down on hugging, asks employees to tell on each other

[…]

The source also informed Page Six that “staffers have been told that if they find out about any affairs, romances, inappropriate relationships or behavior in the office, they have to report it to human resources, their superior or the company anti-harassment phone line.”

Since when did consensual office romances become sexual harassment? Oh yeah, since bitter aging has-been whores deemed it so.

Imagine the type of person who’d be willing and eager to snitch on a co-worker having an office romance. The caricature that comes to mind is a giant, walking pussyhat. Nasty Womanhood, Inc. The anti-sex schoolmarms are on the loose.

The mass movement of women into the workforce and its consequences have been a disaster for Western nations.

To take it to the next level, the source further claimed NBC’s new rules stipulate employees wishing to hug one another “have to do a quick hug, then an immediate release, and step away to avoid body contact” and are forbidden from sharing taxis home or, oddly, “taking vegans to steakhouses.”

We need a new word to describe the hysterically man-hating, anhedonic feminist dystopia that’s unfolding at a rapid clip in America. Gynarchy doesn’t quite nail it. Prisstopia?

This would all be stupidly funny if it wasn’t dead serious, but tbh i’m not a fan of the hugging trend. Compulsory hugs between acquaintances phags up male friendships and desexualizes potential romances between men and women. Thanks, Shrillennials! But I think we’ve hit Peak Hug. Gen Zyklon is bringing back head nods, and with them, a return to electric sexual polarity.

73 Responses to “Peak Hug”

  1. meistergedanken says:

    “Compulsory hugs between acquaintances phags up male friendships and desexualizes potential romances between men and women. ”

    Yes, it’s high time to shore up traditional gender roles/norms to counteract shit like this. In the interest of honing manliness (‘cuz men lead, natch), I’ve been reading the original “Conan” stories, and besides being entertaining they contain a wealth of truths not currently found in today’s limp-wristed fiction:

    – excerpted from Black Colossus, 1933
    A princess regards Conan for the first time:

    “She feared him, told herself she loathed his raw brute strength and unashamed barbarism, yet something breathless and perilous inside her leaned toward him; the hidden primitive chord that lurks in every woman’s soul was sounded and responded. She had felt his hardened hand on her arm, and something deep in her tingled to the memory of that contact. Many men had knelt before Yasmela. Here was one she felt had never knelt before any one. Her sensations were those of one leading an unchained tiger; she was frightened, and fascinated by her fright.”

    How much insight is packed within this morsel? There’s kino (“…felt his hardened hand on her arm”), a frank warning concerning pedestalization (“…Many men had knelt before”), the thrill of danger when being confronted by an actual shit-lord (“…sensations were those of one leading an unchained tiger”), and the author even employs the word “tingle”! And this was 85 years ago. And yes, though I am well aware Howard’s personal life seems to belie the wisdom so apparent in his writings, the socio-sexual observations littering his stories dovetail all too well with the pronouncements bestowed within the Chateau.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. Peak Finance says:

    Here is a topic worth examining as part of this MeToo thing:

    Why aren’t White Male Goy’s a part of Metoo?
    (I mean I know statistically there are some, but it really seems to be a tiny fraction)

    A) White Male Goys are already purged from nearly all positions of power. IS this true? The very thought of this should scare you.

    B) White Male Goy’s are already brow-beaten into never speaking to a chick at the office

    C) White Male Goys typically don’t abuse their power, or, they abuse power at a tiny fraction statistically compared to the Tribe and Savages.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Greg Eliot says:

      The White man is a God-fearing and long-suffering type of creature… he faces adversity with manly stoicism and is slow to anger.

      It remains to be seen if this is our downfall.

      Like

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        Greg finally admits he’s non-White. 2018 is going to be more 2017 than 2017 was!

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        WTF?

        I’ve seen some convoluted reasoning ’round chere, but thinking I’m not White from the above quote is a new type of Rube Goldberg logic.

        Tell us more about your wife’s sex life, (((JJJ))).

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

  3. gunslingergregi says:

    its been like that so they really were living on a different planet then everyone else
    what 8 years ago they went in my camp managers email private type and found he was fucking secretary fired

    Like

  4. gunslingergregi says:

    they shell shocked after a couple months been like this 20 and up years the fuck

    Like

  5. […] Peak Hug […]

    Like

  6. mendo says:

    Taking a vegan to a steakhouse? Why the hell would the thought even be entertained, unless of course someone else was picking up the tab.

    I’m just waiting until they put such controls in the lunchroom, where those eating dead mammal flesh have to be considerate to those that don’t.

    Peak Lunch!

    Liked by 1 person

    • gunslingergregi says:

      like the vegans there haven’t been eating meat
      drumroll

      Liked by 1 person

    • Aussie Chad says:

      It seems as if HR believes that when a man takes a vegan chick to a steakhouse her panties will become so wet from all the meat fumes and testosterone that she won’t be able to stop herself.

      Or else it is a euphemism

      Like

  7. Cloudswrest says:

    Junior Anti-Sex League (from 1984).

    Like

  8. Well, any guy with half a brain should avoid any potential work situation where he places himself at risk of being accused of sexual harassment.

    Female co-workers are not your pals. They are your enemies, and you should see them all in that light.

    Liked by 3 people

    • vfm#7634 says:

      Especially the HR harpies. Looking forward to the day when companies do away with HR departments.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Enfant Terrible says:

        Most definitely. I am so glad I no longer work in the corporate world, it’s a fcking tyranny of the soul.

        Like

      • rocko says:

        It’s probably not that far away. They might have AI systems at the ready ready to evaluate potential candidates for jobs. When that happens, I wonder what the HR hags are going to do. Probably resort to eat their cats. And that’s the only pussy they get to eat.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Paul Murray says:

        HR is a result of line managers not wanting or not being allowed to do their jobs. In a sane world, a project manager would choose who he or she wanted on the team, for any reason. If the higher-ups don’t like that person’s choices or reasons, then they oughtn’t to have made them project manager.

        Like

    • trav777 says:

      now, yeah. In the past, women actually typically met a mate at work.

      But in those times they weren’t in direct competition with men. It’s important to remember that now, all women at work are trying to crawl over your career’s corpse on their way to the nirvana “top” where they acquire the awesomeness that a man would have in that position. Sexy and rich.

      except they don’t. They just get bitter

      Liked by 3 people

      • Enfant Terrible says:

        In a corporate environment, working with women, especially if they are young and single, mostly just sucks. There is an unavoidable tension whenever you have to interact with them, because who knows how they will interpret your words.

        And then you have policies like this one set up by NBC, lol, I feel sorry for any heterosexual guy that will work at that place. Any wrong word, and he’s going to be reported to the thought police, better know has the HR department.

        Liked by 1 person

    • rocko says:

      Even if they hit on you, avoid at all costs. Especially because we all know women get away with this shit. Plus if you live in a big city, there’s no excuse to not find a mate outside of work.

      Liked by 1 person

      • vfm#7634 says:

        Actually, some black broad complained that Charlie Rose did NOT hit on her, saying it was raciss. Da-ned if you do, da-ned if you don’t… which means… carte blanche. Might as well be hanged for a sheep as a lamb.

        Like

    • Jaded Jurist says:

      I turned down a job last month when I realized almost all of my colleagues would be highly-educated females. Not only that, but it was a part-time, remote position.

      What a burden off my shoulders.

      Like

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        That came across poorly. The emphasis on the part-time remote properties was that even when I didn’t have to deal with them every day or face-to-face, I was just not interested in the drama.

        Like

  9. rocko says:

    Maybe they should tell old hags to stop prancing around in bras, amirite Kathy Griffin?

    Like

  10. rocko says:

    Oddly enough, this is the same generation that’s willing to pay money to go to a cuddle party and spoon, I mean, cuddle with complete strangers.

    I kid you not, I actually checked out their site. They actually have one scheduled in San Diego, and it’s $24 per ticket. I mean, if you’re paying money to rub yourself against a stranger, you’re better off going to that socialist paradise that is Venezuela and have an orgy and pay the women with canned beans and tampons.

    https://www.eventbrite.com/e/january-classic-cuddle-party-tickets-41748699484?aff=rss

    Like

    • Obstinatus Ludificator says:

      Shrillenials are “challenging relationship norms” by hiring shrinks to talk to, paying “cuddlists” to touch them, and having pets as “live-in companions”. It’s some sad and hilarious shit.

      Like

  11. When guys make the move to hug past my outstretched hand as if they care, I flip em a hitchhikers thumb and laugh at them. They aren’t my Dad at my Mom’s funeral, I don’t give up hugs to men. Sorry, faggots.

    Like

    • SteveRogers42 says:

      Step to the left at 10 o’clock and pivot on the ball of your left foot like Lomacencko.

      Like

    • Jim, I run into this frequently in Christian circles. I put out my hand to shake hands, and then the other guy grasps me with his left hand around my shoulder and back and draws me in. I clap him on the back in a friendly manner and put up with it. There is always some hesitance on my part, and I am certain that they think that I am uptight. Shit, I even have to embrace their wives, who won’t just shake my hand.

      Like

      • Wives are something else. Mild hug, kiss on the cheek. But dammit, MEN shake hands. For me, I won’t have it. Look, I’m bulletproof in a political sense, I can’t be hurt by my intolerance. Anyone says anything, I cut them OUT of my life and customer base. This is why I tell the young men in my life, hit the road, find an electrician and learn something so valuable they CAN’T f with you over a word, a statement or even these days, a look. It’s UN-fugging-believeable what’s going on. I hope it burns itself out but I don’t see it in my life, although there are signs they’re eating each other. I conservatives had held a line starting 50 years ago, it wouldn’t have gotten to this. But young men are screwed if they’re dependent in any way on this system other than monetary. Then, they run their own shop. It’s easy, when I need help for a project, I don’t have to worry about a woman coming for a job that requires hard work. That’s not what women do.

        Like

  12. Feral Sigma says:

    I unfortunately have no choice but to frequent one establishment where the nigger and coalburner employees love to inappropriately flaunt their office romance in front of clients with PDAs. It’s probably going on many other places, too.

    Anyway, this, like 90% of other absurd workplace policies, is probably driven by the misbehavior of third-world people and their feminist allies.

    Like

  13. DJ Big Boobs says:

    No sir it’s called gynofascism. There is no other word in this world to describe it so take it from me. GYNOFASCISM. Fascism has some integral component a few of which are:

    1-Systematic discrimination. Against men in this case. There are too many examples to elaborate. There was just an article on ROK about a girl who was arrested for DUI and then accused members of the Polish band Decapitated of rape to get out of trouble. The poor guys spent 4 months in jail and will likely not get any compensation for the trauma they experienced.

    2-Prohibiting bonding between people. Nuclear family is bad bad bad!!! Where I work flirting is forbidden and sex is practically almost taboo in this country. This NBC nonsense is another example.

    3-Destroying differences between people. Diversity, gender neutrality/fluidity. Everybody must be the same consumerist docile sheep.

    4-Distracting people from real problems with bogus ones. “Manspreading”, female CEOs don’t make as many millions as male ones OMG! Females have the right to “smelly knickers”! Free the nipple! Ever wondered why politicians adhere to feminism so much?

    A whole book can be written on this; but it’s already been written: 1984.

    So what is gynofascism? It’s using various female characteristics such as group (sheep) mentality, consumerism, amusement with invaders, pleasure to be superficially concerned with (unimportant) things, propensity to take offense as well as the whiteknight-ism of the males to gradually take freedom away from people.

    Will they succeed? I don’t really know but when this word becomes mainstream you know who introduced it.

    Like

  14. kuchara says:

    “Gynarchy doesn’t quite nail it. Prisstopia?”

    How about Vaginasty.

    Like

  15. vfm#7634 says:

    He4rtiste, I wonder what your opinion is about this possible countervailing trend:

    http://www.returnofkings.com/143999/black-woman-complains-that-racist-charlie-rose-didnt-sexually-harass-her

    In summary, I suspect men are in a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” situation in re #metoo. If we completely ignore the womenz in the workplace, they’ll complain about THAT.

    But… a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” situation is also known as a “carte blanche” situation. Might as well be hanged for a sheep as a lamb.

    Like

  16. Hawk says:

    What to call this current age?

    Some random thoughts:

    THOTocracy

    Dysc-ntopia

    Imperium Hysterium

    G@shtatorship

    The Queefening

    Feelzistan

    Can we have a vote?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jaded Jurist says:

      Doesn’t matter, as it’s about to become the Second Renaissance

      Like

    • Big-Al says:

      Grave New World
      Cockwork Whorange
      The Iron High Heel
      Ninety Eighty-Whore
      District 69
      Rear-Ender’s Game
      Lord of the Vocal Fries
      Invasion of the Pu$$y Snatchers
      The Handmade Tail (a story about @nal s3x robots)

      That’s about all the dystopia I can handle

      Liked by 3 people

      • Hawk says:

        Slow clapping bro.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        +1 on the late,great… and nearly forgotten… Jack London work..

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        On a side note:

        Rather, Invasion of the Pussy-Hatters, amirite? 😉

        Like

      • dzhugashvili says:

        things you don’t expect to see on this website …

        the late, great — and nearly forgotten — Jack London work …

        THE IRON HEEL

        The rise of the Oligarchy will always remain a cause of secret wonder to the historian and the philosopher. Other great historical events have their place in social evolution. They were inevitable. Their coming could have been predicted with the same certitude that astronomers to-day predict the outcome of the movements of stars. Without these other great historical events, social evolution could not have proceeded. Primitive communism, chattel slavery, serf slavery, and wage slavery were necessary stepping-stones in the evolution of society. But it were ridiculous to assert that the Iron Heel was a necessary stepping-stone. Rather, to-day, is it adjudged a step aside, or a step backward, to the social tyrannies that made the early world a hell, but that were as necessary as the Iron Heel was unnecessary.

        https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1164/1164-h/1164-h.htm

        Liked by 1 person

    • Les Saunders, Protestant says:

      The Moderin Age.

      Like

  17. Jaded Jurist says:

    Wow, the SJWs’ relevance has been in rapid decline lately, but they really jumped the shark with this one.

    Watching the implosion and replacement will be sublime.

    Like

  18. strongwhitecock says:

    The hug is a shit test. If a girl tries to hug you, especially the two arm, wraparound hug, she is instantly putting you into the friend zone.

    I rarely hug a girl, friend or not. If I do, I give her the one arm, shoulder bump bro hug, and it always noticeably agitates them. They always act affronted by my reluctant, insincere “hug” probably because deep down inside they feel like I am the one friend zoning them and taking away their power to zone me.

    Liked by 1 person

    • vfm#7634 says:

      “especially the two arm, wraparound hug, she is instantly putting you into the friend zone.”

      Not necessarily. This is a bit tricky. There are subtle differences between friendzoning hugs and those which indicate she’s falling for you sexually. In the case of the latter, she’ll initiate (of course), and they’ll have extra warmth, with her body pushing into you and lasting longer.

      Like

    • Tam the Bam says:

      Just grab ’em by the pussy

      Like

  19. Lovekraft says:

    It all started with Participation Badges. Hard to deny this truth. When we allowed the single or overbearing mothers to place their children above their deserved place.

    A perfect analogy for so many other problems we see today.

    Like

  20. ultimathule1 says:

    I’ve always hated mandatory hugs. I was raised in a Finnish immigrant home, and my people rarely hug – it makes us feel uncomfortable. We shake hands, including between the sexes. I also detest “hi-fives” as a low-class greeting originating in the Black ghetto culture.

    Like

    • Mabui says:

      Similar upbringing. Some huggy women pick up on it from my response and stop it. Try to lift them, grunt and say “Puttin’ on the poundage ‘eh?’, things like that get through to some women.

      Like

  21. Jaded Jurist says:

    So, there’s been some discussion about hugs. I’m a huge fan, tbh, of hugging. In the military, hugs were almost currency, or at least some sort of social proof. Mind you, that was decades ago. But you do hug the bros who’ve had your back, full stop. You hug the chicks when you’ve all been drinking, which isn’t rare in the forces.

    In the comments today, hugs are seen to have lost their luster. What’s the deal? When is social hugging appropriate anymore? I refrain from hugging strangers, but I must confess I enjoy hugging friends.

    Okay, fine, full disclosure: the finest pieces of tail I’ve enjoyed all began with conspicuous hugging. Just run those hands up and down those exquisitely crafted backs and sides, and, well…nobody’s going to set me against hugging.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Ivan says:

      My understanding is that hugging used to be common among American men. It and other physical displays of affection went out of style once the gays came out of the closet.

      Like

  22. Paul Murray says:

    “Imagine the type of person who’d be willing and eager to snitch on a co-worker having an office romance. The caricature that comes to mind is a giant, walking pussyhat.”

    I imagine a mean old spinster. The kind of schoolmarm that is a little too free with the ruler on the knuckles of the kiddies.

    Like

  23. …”We need a new word to describe the hysterically man-hating, anhedonic feminist dystopia that’s unfolding at a rapid clip in America”…

    Bitchinism.

    Like

  24. HerewardMW says:

    I’m assuming “taking a vegan to the steakhouse” is a euphamism for something really dirty. If not it should be.

    Like

    • Exurban says:

      I actually think that one is real; there’s some effed up vegetarian bimbo high up in NBC (maybe inside HR) who’s been crying because just that happened to her.

      But if it is a euphemism I want to know :^)

      Like

  25. […] From the #MeTooPlease vault: In wake of Matt Lauer’s firing, NBC reportedly cracks down on hugging, asks employees to tell on each other. The source also informed Page Six that “staffers have been told that if they find out about any affairs, romances, inappropriate relationships or behavior in the office, they have to report it to human resources, their superior or the company anti-harassment phone line.” Since when did consensual office romances become sexual harassment? Oh yeah, since bitter aging has-been whores deemed it so. Imagine the type of person who’d be willing and eager to snitch on a co-worker having an office romance. The caricature that comes to mind is a giant, walking pussyhat. Nasty Womanhood, Inc. The anti-sex schoolmarms are on the loose. https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2018/01/08/peak-hug/ […]

    Like

  26. Kyo says:

    The Goolag’s war on white males continues:

    Like

  27. AlBundy says:

    Estrophilia?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion