Feed on
Posts
Comments

A commenter over at the Goodbye, America blog, Theodora, has a great insight about the major difference between fat men and fat chicks.

I think that one big difference between female obesity and male obesity is this: while the health and aesthetics problems are common to both sexes, female obesity is totalitarian. Fat men don’t demand to be called Big Beautiful Boys. They don’t lie themselves that they are voluptuous, gorgeous and curvy. They don’t want to change the standards of beauty existing since the beginning of humanity. They don’t shame and bully thin people (“eat a sandwich!:), they don’t ask to vanity change the sizes of clothes, they don’t ask to erase the word “fat” from public conversations. Fat men usually deal with their problems individually and in silence, while fat women want to change society, dictionaries, standards, reality and human nature to ease the burden of their fatness, acting as true Stalinists in the process.

That’s why the female obesity epidemic is more dangerous than a matter of health and aesthetics, and an affront not only to Beauty, but also to Truth, and well-deserving of the Shiv.

Theodora nailed it, and it’s something I’ve been saying here for a while: the real danger of fat acceptance — a malignant movement largely (heh) spearheaded by women — is the dishonest advocacy against all that is True and Beautiful and Sexy. The fat chick who knows she’s gross looking, and who wants to be thin to be attractive to men once again, is never a target of my shiv. I save my necessary sadism for those fat chicks who lie through their food-laced teeth trying to convince the world to believe 1. they have tons (heh) of men banging down their doors 2. that they don’t suffer any sexual market penalties for being land whales 3. that there’s nothing unhealthy or unappealing about fatness 4. that men prefer fatsos anyhow 5. that indeed fatness is objectively attractive 6. that not only that but fatness is MORE attractive than those stick figure thin girls men are tricked into desiring 7. that society told men to be disgusted by fat chicks and 7. that’s just, like, your opinion you awful no good body-shaming misogynist.

Fat men? They rarely, if ever, lie like fat chicks do about their condition. The shit stream of fat acceptance sophistry — eerily similar to the #SelfLoveWins degenerate freak parade sophistry that characterizes the equalist left — is mostly a female thing, and its effluvium  seems endless….until someone with balls finally calls them out on it and drops a steaming deus vult in their social media ego gratification circle diddle of miserable lying fatties pretending their custom-made reacharound wiping implements aren’t a testament to their great shame and self-abasing dehumanization.

There’s one other notable difference between fat men and fat chicks that helps explain why fat women feel compelled to engage in a quixotic quest to change the world so that their fatness is desirable to quality men:

Fat men really don’t suffer as large a penalty to their romantic fortunes. Male desire is predominately visual-oriented, which means fat chicks whose female forms are buried under layers of disfiguring blubber simply can’t arouse the same ardor in men that thin shapely women who can never be misidentified as a block of cheese can arouse.

Female desire is holistic, meaning that women subconsciously weigh (heh) more factors when judging men for romantic promise. Fatness doesn’t kill a man’s chances for love and romance with nearly the same brutally quick efficiency that  fatness kills a women’s chances for love. I’m not saying fatness is irrelevant to men’s SMV; I’m saying a fat man with compensating attractiveness traits can overcome the SMV handicap of his fatness, which is something that no funny, charming, wealthy, creative, or socially dominant fat woman can ever hope to do for herself.

I think fat women, deep down, know this about themselves. They know their fatness kills romance dead for them. This engenders a lot of resentment and spite in them, which they take out on thin women and men in general, for the equalist sin of having standards and discriminating taste. Because no sin in the Leftoid Equalism Fatty Gooniverse is worse than the sin of revealed judgmentalism. The post-West coddled fat chick would rather go to her early grave railing futilely against the God of Biomechanics than to lose weight and therefore admit to herself that her ugly life and uglier beliefs were a pack of lies all along….and those very bad fat-shaming men like yours truly were right.

185 Responses to “The Difference Between Fat Men And Fat Chicks”

  1. Fat men = need lostas cockaz to get beyond da fat
    Fat womenz = need lostas cocks to get beyond da fat

    ergo, men and women are da exact same
    and da feminists
    were right
    lzozozolzo

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Doktor Jeep says:

    Possibly people will read that and think “ah, fat chicks can’t get laid”.

    Oh but they do! But… and worse than not getting laid, for a woman… they don’t get laid on their own terms with men they want! It’s like double the curse!

    An old saw from the past, still true today, is this: Go to a bar. See the fat dudes and the fat chicks. Come back at last call. See if you see any fat chicks.

    Naturally this could be taken as anecdotal. But just about every fellow knows fat dudes (who admit it and might, as a friend of mine does, say “Hey I like to eat if you don’t like how I look then don’t look at me”) who go for years not getting laid. Especially the poor ones.

    But fat chicks will still get laid, right? But the metric on which they judge men and their blubber only ensures that the metric they use is inversely met!

    So when dealing with a fat feminist who falls back on the “what’s the matter, can’t get laid” retort, just smile and know what horror is lurking beneath those many layers of skin. With the right meta-knowledge the right retort may be possible that’ll have her up all night.

    Like

  3. Oleaginous Outrager says:

    Perhaps a similar parallel is “fat woman/short men”, but you still never hear short dudes wanting everyone taller than them chopped off at the knees, and they have no options comparable to the simple “eat less and move more”.

    That GBA picture that Theodora refers to says it all: the one activity the lardies can bother to engage in is smashing scales that tell the truth of their condition.

    Like

  4. Ben Shona says:

    Have any of you seen a show called This Is Us which features an extremely fat broad.

    Like

    • mendo says:

      Shhh…careful when mentioning that show’s name. Otherwise we’ll be inundated by IT Niggums’ infamous gif.

      Liked by 1 person

    • When you watch a show like that, make sure you visit your MD and get your testosterone and estrogen levels checked. Then get a top up of testosterone followed by a visit to a Gun range.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Hackett To Bits says:

      Attempted to watch it once with a woman I was banging…she gushed about it. And the show too. I moved on before I could ask why she, a thin, fit chick, was not disgusted by a drama that seemed to be 1/3 plotted around the life of that landmass of a “woman”.

      Like

  5. [White] men usually deal with their problems individually and in silence, while [women and muds] want to change society, dictionaries, standards, reality and human nature to ease the burden of their [incompetence], acting as true Stalinists in the process.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Back to the men preferring younger women post: Nothing tells the truth like porn consumption, and “18years old” is a very popular category. Thing is, all those girls are quite filled out in their bodies. You won’t see a porn starlet without good curves, normally.

    Now, i had always assumed that the non white, nonAsian predilction for very young girls was a sort of race to get it in before her dad and brothers and cousins and every other man in the village did. 13yo virgins are rare in the turd world. Also, where in modern white countries we’ve moved the wall father and and farther back to about 30 for women, thirld world women get ugly quick, and the brief bloom of beauty in the teens is all a woman gets before her third world lifestyle catches up with her.

    Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      Attractive Latinas under 30 are plentiful.
      Attractive Latinas over 30 are rare as hen’s teeth.
      One night, you go to bed with a swimsuit model and wake up with Frankenstein’s monster’s gr@ndma.

      Like

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        Wolfmeister et al.: do Latinas in Europe look like they do in North America, where thery’re mixed with Aztec (etc.) stock? I find something curious that North American Latinas, on the whole, have underdeveloped hips that make their rear ch33ks squash together unnaturally. They waddle as they walk, even when not yet obese. Thoughts?

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Latinas in Europe tend to be Columbian or Brazilian.

        Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        JJ- Not sure what you mean by ‘Latinas in Europe’, I don’t remember Mediterranean women being referred to as ‘Latinas’, that’s a New World term.
        Which is also how mean it, referring to Hispanic women in the Americas.
        Can’t say I’ve ever noticed any ‘underdeveloped’ hips among them, if anything, more like the opposite.
        There are, of course, lots of different types of Hispanics (of any ethnicity you can think of), local results may vary.

        Never was much of a fan of European Mediterraneans, my first real gf was French, but she looked a lot more German or Dutch than French.

        Like

      • PA says:

        — North American Latinas, on the whole, have underdeveloped hips

        They do. Look at a non-obese mestiza sometime. Narrow hips, thick waist.

        Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        You might be talking about Native girls.
        Long legs, barrel-shaped body.
        Some of them would qualify as ‘Hispanic’, at least in the SW.

        Like

      • kimber says:

        Mostly because they turn into fireplugs, quickly.
        Eggs with Legs, as I call the predominant modern female shape.

        Like

    • Jaded Jurist says:

      “18 years old” is nothing compared to what “16 years old” would attract. There’s a reason they call it Sweet Sixteen.

      Although as a good-looking bartender buddy (tends bar next to a major party school that attracts a lot of fine talent) said to me: once the younger ones open their mouths and start speaking, all attraction evaporates.

      Quite the cultural problem we have here.

      Like

      • “once the younger ones open their mouths and start speaking, all attraction evaporates.”

        This sounds like something a woman would say.

        Like

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        “Something women would say”? How so? I took it at face value from a decent dude tired of having to put up with little girls’ shenanigans. Having not tried to start a relationship with a teenager since the 90s, I had no rebuttal.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        You’re just Young. Really young women require the ability to ignore nonstop stupidity.

        Like

      • driveallnight says:

        You’ve obviously never bartended, cavorite. The profusion of ass lobbed at you numbs.

        Liked by 2 people

      • cortesar says:

        stupidity and shallowness you could learn to live with but that f*ucking vocal fry I just can’t even
        Say one more “like” bitch I double dare you, say “like” again…

        Liked by 1 person

      • Never bartended. I’m 38. Young people are stupid, period. I said “that sounds like something a woman would say” because that’s what women my age always say.

        Any improvement in conversation that comes with age is more than offset by the accompanying bitterness and loss of physical appeal.

        Liked by 1 person

      • driveallnight says:

        sperg.txt

        Like

  7. Denial and self sabotage are powerful forces. For a lot of people it allows them to live their lives day to day. For them truth and denial are like train tracks always running in parallel and never meeting.

    Like

  8. Nice post, but I think this goes a bit deeper, biologically speaking.

    We don’t see mates as merely sex partners, we see them as potential parents of our offspring. Biology tells us fat men can and do produce healthy babies. The sperm doesn’t suffer because its “owner,” so to speak, is obese.

    On the other hand, an overweight woman brings a whole bunch of potential health issues to both herself and her child if she gets pregnant. So when we see fat women, we subconsciously think of things like kids born with complications and mothers dying in childbirth.

    We’re guided by our subconscious biological urges more than we realize. This is why we wince when we see the disfigured. They represent what we don’t want to reproduce with. The reason we know that is because God (or nature, or whatever) put that “wincing” factor into us instinctively. (This also ties in with the “disgust factor,” which has been discussed on this blog.)

    So, if both men and women instinctively think “ew!” when they see a fat women and not a fat man, there is a reason for that. We were created that way for a reason. All the propaganda in the world isn’t going to change that.

    The reason you don’t see similar propaganda for fat men (or short men, for that matter) is that while they might be ignored by women, they don’t evoke the gag factor unless they’re truly freakish.

    Like

    • Oliver Elkington says:

      Regarding the disfigured, how would having children with a woman who for example had part of her face damaged in an accident lead to children being born less healthy than had the woman remained facially normal?

      Like

      • Days of Broken Arrows says:

        By disfigured, I meant by birth. Most of the time, we can tell immediately when people aren’t born right. The face emerges through the brain, which is why the features of people with fetal alcohol syndrome look different, for example.

        But since you brought it up, your kid would be a lot more likely to get teased and ostracized if he has a mom who looks like a freak show. That’s why god invented plastic surgeons.

        Like

      • Oliver Elkington says:

        Has evolution built in a mechanism that makes us unattracted to people that are facially disfigured by association of life being more difficult for the whole family when a member is disfigured? you could say the same thing about a man with no arms or legs being less attractive because of the difficulty of raising children with such a person.

        Like

    • Jaded Jurist says:

      Potential parent of one’s offspring?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Physically, she needs to gain a few lbs [which I suppose she will, S/P m@rriage].

        Morally, though, the navel metal is an instant disqualifier [as is the bikini, TBH].

        Liked by 2 people

      • Cracker says:

        looks like she has a tat peaking out of the top of her bikini bottoms too. verdict —-> attention whore who is already spoiled goods —-> not mommy material.

        shame though. the face is nice.

        Like

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        Ya I thought the metal and ink would provoke ire. Good eye, gentlemen. Your damaged-goods-dar is correctly attuned. Such a shame.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        BTW, on the “gain a few pounds” thing: used to be fine with anything not approaching fat. In recent years, however, I’ve found myself more and more appreciative of the tight-b0died, taut-skinned look of the above specimen. I’m not certain what the cause is. Perhaps some sort of visual starvation, based on the ever-heftier heifer that is today called a normal American woman? I’ve actually become stricter over the years in how much fat I will permit a girl to flaunt. Perhaps my “Jaded” moniker has to do with it.

        Like

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        Okay, Cap’n & Crew, I dredged through my files to find something I thought you might like. No piercing, no tats, not too skinny, not too fat. Verdict?

        Liked by 1 person

      • JironGhrad says:

        TBH, yellow bikini girl looks high maintenance: pose + drink. Something else, I can’t quite put my finger on: might be the pose or angle of the shot but she seems strangely narrow at the bust… might be a push-up top… or maybe the picture is ‘shopped.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        Yeah, that top is definitely smashing those titties together to make them appear bigger than they really are. Had an experience like that recently with a gal. She took the bra off and I was like “where’d you tits go?”

        Yellow bikini girl doesn’t have an ample enough bosom for that unforced cleavage–the kind of cleavage that magically appears when the bosom is at rest; doesn’t require clothing to create the cleavage.

        And the bottom of her bikini–something about the brass strap screams “major slooooot”

        Like

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        Wow this is a tough crowd.

        Try hairdresser girl: now, never, or in a few years?

        Like

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        Let me guess: her upper arms are too fat.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Body-wise, Yellow Bikini Girl >>> Black Bikini Girl.

        Much more feminine curves.

        [I still can’t stand bikinis, though – my woman shows her skin to me & me alone. In public, she can wear a 1-piece + a sarong.]

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        Cappy, I may have pinpointed your type. Although I prefer less eye makeup, perhaps this lass?

        Note: she’s closing in on 30 here.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “Let me guess: her upper arms are too fat.”

        JJ, these chicks are skinny as he11. I rarely saw chicks that skinny even before the obesity epidemic, and nowadays, I wouldn’t see them anywhere this side of a K-5 elementary school. [Have you seen grade 6-8 middle school girls lately? Beluga Friggin’ City.]

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “I may have pinpointed your type.”

        Bingo. A chick whose father doesn’t let her leave the house dressed like a pr0n actress. A chick who seems like she might be fun to talk to. A chick who honors her people’s history.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        PS: Are you gonna tell us that all four of these are the same girl, just with different hair styles?

        Like

      • JironGhrad says:

        For my tastes, they all need more actual cleavage. Hairdresser “appears” to be the best of the lot, but we have no idea about her tats/daddy issues from the picture; she could have a tramp stamp and a tat below her belly button with an arrow pointing down and the caption “we never close”. #4 would at first glance seem to be the best, BUT… her eyes tell me that she’s quite a bit older than first glance suggests (your note says pushing 30, I’d have guessed 35).

        Liked by 1 person

      • mendo says:

        St. Paulie Girl FTW!

        Bottom’s up, baby!

        Liked by 2 people

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        *Are you gonna tell us that all four of these are the same girl, just with different hair styles?*

        LOL, not in the least. Each is a different ch!ck, and I know only one of them in person.

        I’m just a student of humanity; that’s why I’m at le Chateau. If I could do it all over again, I might have forewent law school for Anthropology studies, had I thought I could find a school that wouldn’t kick me out for pointing out the emperor’s nakedness.

        True story: you know how there are so many girls you’ve met whose visages are burned into your minds as pinnacles of beauty and femininity? One of my favorites was a Mennonite girl I met at a farm while visiting her parents’ little shop. I turned the corner of the cornfield to meet this young teen who had just finished checking on the chickens, as I recall. She was in a long dress that utterly failed to fit her form (but still allowed one to see that she wasn’t the slightest bit overweight) buttoned up to the top button of her collar. All I could see was from the neck up, yet her perfect prettiness still made time stop.

        I get it, and given the chance, I would preach it. However, in this Instagram age, when fine fillies keep deciding to post pics of their exquisitely tight and slender bodies, I have to admit that I find it hard to look away.

        Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        Healthy girl, physically. Nothing wrong with breeding with her and taking the child back to the Boys from Brazil compound in the high cloud country. Those, hips, the bub would drop out like it was being dunked through a basketball hoop.

        Like

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        JironGhrad, you’re perceptive (and I don’t mean that in the way it was recently discussed on this site). Hairdresser girl does indeed have major daddy issues, although at the time of this photo (17 or 18) she had not yet succumbed to the Black Hole of Soul that is the Current Year. Also, no tats.

        Older Eyes Girl might actually be 30 here (I’d have to look it up), but not near 35. I have it on good authority that she’s a sweetheart, but I also have reason to suspect that she (single) is missing something in her life, which may account for the weary look.

        That’s enough detail about women I may or may not know.

        Like

      • LOL you guys kill me. I mean abundance mentality and all but geez

        Like

      • #3 and #4 are the same person

        Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        Yellow bikini needs a face, hairdresser girl looks a li’l skimpy on top, so does black bikini, not fan of dirndl girl’s face.
        Having said all that, all 4 are head and shoulders above the masses and most guys go months, perhaps even years (or decades) without meeting anything even remotely resembling any of them.
        Except Chateau posters, of course.
        I don’t care about the clothes, I care about their contents.
        She can dress like a slut pron actress – as long as she doesn’t ACT like one.
        Contrary to some – you know who you are – I am not stuck in a fantasy bubble composed of 1950s movies and TV shows and therefore able to see the world for what it actually is – here and now.
        While I would prefer women without tattoos and piercings, I am fully conscious (see it every day) of the fact that finding attractive women under the age of 50 without any body modifications in today’s West isn’t so easy, so I’ve gotten used to them.
        If the rest of her’s good, I’ll ignore the comics and junkyard.

        Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      It also sends the signal the man is a good farmer who brings in regular surpluses.

      Like

  9. wolfie65 says:

    Agree wholeheartedly with the post except the last part.
    F@t men do suffer HUGELY in the SM, unless they have lotsas moneyses and or highsztatuszeszsz
    Heh.
    They do not suffer as totalitarianly (it’s a word now….) as women do, but still hugely.

    Liked by 1 person

    • JironGhrad says:

      I disagree, to an extent. It takes a larger BMI in general to suffer the same effect; men also tend to carry the weight differently and retain muscle better, such that men and women at the same height/weight have different results. The other thing to consider is that “F@T” is somewhat nebulous. Are we talking about a guy who’s 6’2″ and 240 lbs. (which is considered obese; 30.8 BMI, obese is 30) or that same guy at 350 lbs.?

      I’m the former example (these days, after an accident) and it’s not hurt my SMV so far as I can tell. I’ve been able to get 8-9’s most of the time, even while in-between jobs. Lots of small, thin girls feel safe snuggling up to a big guy like that. Now, I’ll also be the first to say that I really ought to give up soda and go back to eating better for my health, but truthfully game is what matters not looks, size, or the bank account.

      Like

    • Jaded Jurist says:

      I’ve yo-yoed from fat to fit multiple times. Women have been into me at all spectra of the scale (pun intended). So long as the girl is a 7 or below, my extra heft is no impediment.

      In fact, I’ve found a curious opposite effect when I’m at my fittest: the 6s and 7s don’t even respond as well as the 8s, because the 7s think I’m out of their league.

      Mind you, on off days when I’m feeling low and lacking confidence, 6s are the best I can hope to engage, regardless of my physical splendor. 7s and 8s will show interest, but they quickly lose it if I’m not fully there.

      Game basics.

      Like

  10. LB says:

    An easy and brutal shiv for any fat activist (best done with the maximum number of witnesses)… ask them if they are currently trying to lose weight. They look stupid no matter how they answer.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Oliver Elkington says:

      Or say that being obese is a working class thing(seeing as these sorts of people usually look down on mere proles) and you can back it up with data that confirms that poorer areas are far more likely to suffer from obesity.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Jaded Jurist says:

    M o d re view re quest. In other words: affirm me!

    Ouch, just making that jest gave me a headache, not even kidding. How do the Millennials do it?

    Like

  12. Jaded Jurist says:

    The difference between men and chick, fat not considered, can be seen in the following female monologue seen recently on f@gbook:

    Dear ex😔 : Fuck you!
    Dear self 💞 : never let anyone down grade you know matter how much you love them. Stand up.
    Dear crush🙈: xoxo
    Dear mom👩: How could you know and not do anything
    Dear Dad 👨🏻: You abandoned me.
    Dear school 🏢: see you soon
    Dear siblings👭: I love you (((firstname lastname)))
    Dear past me😏: Have your babies and go. You can’t change him. He will hurt you
    Dear future me🚀: Hit the lotto please
    Dear future child👶🏻: pled the 5th
    Dear person i hate 😊: I don’t hate anyone
    Dear person I love 💘: I love you so much
    Dear ex best friend.🚫: you broke me. Worse then anyone has in my whole life. Sometimes I hate that I still love you

    Dear best friend(s): i love you all

    **********************

    [A moment of silence until barf bags have been filled]

    **********************

    Women: equal to or better than men in every way, they say.

    Tell us again, females: you’re just the same as men because _________?

    Like

    • melmoth says:

      “Dear Dad; You abandoned me”

      should read; “Dear Dad; mom divorce raped you and moved us to Florida on your dime just to spite you because you had to stay in Colorado at your business to be able to continue paying CS/Alimony. And then she also filed false child rape charges against you during the divorce proceedings so that you could only have custody of me for two weeks in June. The feminist judge just nodded when mom’s divorce lawyer stated that you don’t commit child rape in June. June is when mom likes to EPL overseas with her old sorority sisters. Thanks for not raping people in June.”

      Like

  13. Fat women will often use the line that ‘large women in many other countries are considered beautiful’.

    But perhaps there are other reasons why men in certain cultures would be more accepting of fatness. One would be that in places where food is scarce being able to keep your concubine in carbs is a status symbol and a sign of prestige which is worth more than sexiness. The other reason is that in places where polygamy is common then a man might have a fat older wife as the mother- figure to do the cooking, and more nubile ones for the fuckin’. So the plump wife is a sign of domestic comforts.

    Funny thing is that the first reason amounts to turning women into an object, in this case one of status, and in the latter it is because one man can have wives for different reasons. Both of which would be unacceptable to a feminist.

    I have trouble believing that any men anywhere would really prefer the way an obese woman looks. It would be like there being a culture where small, puny looking men are considered more threatening-looking. Why would you?

    Like

    • Oleaginous Outrager says:

      Simple response: “And women in those countries are treated just like cattle. Maybe a little worse.”

      These mule-whining lardbuckets thinking there’s an oppressive patriarchy here, let ’em wife up some Nigerian or Kenyan in their homeland. Then they’ll know, then they’ll know . . .

      Like

    • itsme says:

      Fat women will often use the line that ‘large women in many other countries are considered beautiful’.

      tell them to name three….i’d bet they can’t.

      out of curiosity i did a g00gl3 search for ‘countries where fat women are prized’

      the top 10:

      mauritania
      nauru
      tahiti
      afghanistan
      samoa
      south africa
      jamaica
      fiji
      kuwait
      tonga

      yep, all shining beacons of modern civilization lllzolzzolzolzozlzolzolllzolzzlz

      Like

    • melmoth says:

      That’s because ‘large women’ in Asia and Latin America just means curvier, not fatter. ‘Large women’ in EE means 6′ 130 lbs with 40 30 34 measurements. ‘Large women’ in America means 5’3″ buck ninety.

      Like

    • Kirk Parker says:

      That’s not quite how it works.

      Yes, of course the young hottie gets all the action, but she also does all the heavy lifting of the housework. The Senior Wife(tm) is the matriarch, and supervises…

      Like

  14. cortesar says:

    Miss Finland, Miss France and Miss Germany, 1963. pic.twitter.com/xfqyQ3qPbd

    — History In Pictures (@HistoryInPix) June 17, 2017

    Liked by 2 people

    • skorzecin150 says:

      The one on the right is a knockout. Impressed enough to look her up. Miss Germany in 1963 was Helga Ziesemer, a brunette. And she had dark hair in the competition. Now, that was Miss Germany in the Miss Universe competition, Miss Germany in the Miss World competition in 1963 was 19 year old Susie Gruner, who was a blonde so I think this is her.

      1963 Miss World was the first one won by, you guest it, a “woman of color” (apparently), Carole Crawford. But looking up Carole Crawford, either every picture of her ever taken has been lightened up (considerably), or she just ain’t no “woman of color”.

      An early product of race mixing I guess, she has the flat nose but really no other ‘groid features.

      What WAS interesting about this 1963 competition (held in London), was that they were shopping around all the white contestants with some pavement ape called “Kenny Lynch”. Those pictures were disgusting, seems England was getting a head start in the miscegenation stakes. They’re good at that.

      Well, now I’m an expert on beauty competitions, next time I run into The President we’ll have something else to talk about.

      Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        Miss Finland reminds me of a formerbFrench gf, Miss Germany of a former Danish gf, Miss France looks a little like an Austrian girl I had a crush on in HS.
        Your instincts about the Brits are correct, you may be interested in a book called Dark Albion by David Abbott.
        They started importing Africans and Jamaicans in the 1950s, even before the French went on their North Africa tear.
        Looks like Princess Di may have had at least 2 Ay-rab bfs after Princeling Dumboears dumped her.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Ironsides says:

        That Carole Crawford was a hideous object — that nose was a combination of gorilla and pig. Disgusting that she was Miss World 1963 — any of the three in the picture above would have been a far better candidate than that troglodyte.

        Willing to bet she was quite brown, too — those mid skin tones often don’t really show up in black and white photographs as significantly different from white.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        And runners-up? Sweden, Denmark, New Zealand, and Finland.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Judging by the hair and complexion, Miss Jamaica served up a mug with more cream than coffee… the fact that this idiocy happened as far back as 1963… and in England, not some banana republic… proves that the POZ was already in bloom.

        Like

  15. cortesar says:

    Liked by 2 people

    • cortesar says:

      Liked by 3 people

      • cortesar says:

        Liked by 2 people

      • Oleaginous Outrager says:

        Despite many jokes at their tech ineptitude, a lot of boomers are just as addicted to the pixel boxes as the youngerns, and all their vaunted “experience” hasn’t prevented them from getting sucked into the stupid hole with all the rest.

        Liked by 3 people

      • wolfie65 says:

        Over the past 2 years or so, I’ve actually noticed a decrease in screen addiction, at least among young, pretty girls – which is where it counts.
        They’re usually the first and fastest to ditch old trends and take up new ones.

        Like

      • tomjones says:

        ‘Despite many jokes at their tech ineptitude, a lot of boomers are just as addicted to the pixel boxes as the youngerns, and all their vaunted “experience” hasn’t prevented them from getting sucked into the stupid hole with all the rest.’

        99% of boomers are absolute clowns. For all “their” experience, they have minds of 12 year old boys. The worst generation since The Merovingians.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Damn mod… one more try:

        The worst generation since The Merovingians.

        no-bones showing his historical acumen, as usual.

        Ever hear of a fellow called Martel The Hammer, circa 732 AD?

        You can thank a Merovingian that you don’t have to show yo’ azz to the skies five times a day, amidst the caterwauling of fellow sand worms kowtowing to a false god.

        All you do is show it here, at the chateau, about as often.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Liked by 1 person

      • Lord Sir x says:

        boomers are the absolute worst, except for the generations that followed that are gayer, fatter, weaker, dumber, and more vibrant.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        The generation gap conflict leaves little for ANY generation to have room to talk about the others, nigh these past five or six generations of ‘Murricans.

        Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        Gen X got hit from behind out of left field and before they could say, ‘What the….’, it was the 90s, Political Correctness was The Law Of The Land, Roseanne and Seinfeld the biggest stars and soccer teams worldwide were becoming more Brazilian and Zaire-ian by the day.
        This occurred while the Greatest Generation was pahssing the toach to the Boomers.
        Gen Y – what most of you call ‘Millennials’ – don’t know any better, even the oldest among them were way too young to notice when things were still kinda normal.
        They wouldn’t know normal if it fell on their head and bit them in the nose.
        The generation I call Millennials (2000 – 2020, presumably) seem to feel that something is…off …but can’t quite put their finger on what exactly.
        They need our help.

        Liked by 1 person

  16. Nads says:

    Another difference. I know guys who were fat, lost weight and kept it off. Trying hard to remember a fat woman who lost weight and kept it off.

    Like

    • Days of Broken Arrows says:

      I was gonna say “Carnie Wilson,” but recent photos prove your point. The weight didn’t stay off.

      Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      Women’s ability to lie to themselves – as well as everyone else – never ceases to amaze me.
      There’s one who tells me she runs marathons – but she’s at least 60 lbs. overweight and out of breath after a couple of 3-minute 2-steps.
      She couldn’t walk to the grocery store without having to sit down at least once.
      Many of them, especially of that oh-so-precious Boomer variety, tell themselves that dance lessons are a great way to lose weight.
      If by ‘dance lesson’ you mean 2 hours of non-stop Polka, Swing or Hip-Hop, yes.
      2 Foxtrots per hour ain’t gonna do it……..

      Like

  17. Sentient says:

    The difference? You will see fat guys with hot chicks. Maybe not common but you’ve seen it. I’ve never seen a top guy with a fat chick.

    Like

    • Divine Son of Codreanu says:

      Like

    • Divine Son of Codreanu says:

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      This is news?

      Maybe it is, of sorts, because relatively recently I know there are a lot of dothaids been tryin’ to downplay any Aryan influence in the past… but the Aryan Invasions of India several millennia ago was common knowledge when I went to grade school.

      Hell, any 1st year linguistics student could tell on that aspect alone.

      Liked by 1 person

      • tomjones says:

        ‘Or be consistent, and cry a few of those alligator tears for the collateral damage in women and children’s blood that Uncle Sam has all over his hands.’

        Most of the ‘collateral damage’ in women and children killed by Uncle Sam ARE iraqi, somalis, yemenites, nicaraguan and various types of Brown People.

        WE DON’T CARE ABOUT BROWNIES. We are white. duh. You are one dumb asshole. 😡

        Anders killed WHITE kids. quod erat demonstrandum.

        Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      So was Latin America a few hundred years ago.

      Both places are dumps.

      Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      So was Latin America a few hundred years ago.

      Both places are dvmps.

      Like

  18. Greg Eliot says:

    Whadda we talkin’ about here, the weight?

    YEAH, we’re talkin’ about the weight! Whaddya THINK I’ve been talkin’ about?

    Stop eating, ya fat bastid!

    I have a thyroid problem.

    Well, then stop eatin’ thyroid.

    /Mixed move rape!

    Like

  19. UKIP says:

    There’s no difference between fat men and fat women as far as diabetes and death are concerned. A little difference amongst the proles, a bigger difference amongst the bourgeosie, and a great difference amongst the Jews.

    The less physicality amongst the group, the more nerdy the group, the more that game as a system of rules and regulations applies to it. Where game is natural and spontaneous, however, the physical is again more important. Prole women care more about what you look like and your ability to beat the crap out of any rival.

    Liked by 1 person

    • UKIP says:

      Fat women and male nerds have something in common which is the overwhelming sense that the world is at fault for not finding them attractive. They both want to try and change society because of this.

      Fat women would like to return to a point in history where being fat spelt an indispensable and bountiful supply of resources, and male nerds would like to return to a point in history where being a nerd spelt an indispensable and bountiful supply of resources.

      Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        The Nerd is now at an apex.
        THIS is the time when being a Nerd spells (sometimes, anyway) an indispensable and bountiful supply of resources.
        And yet, the G0d-Emperor Nerd his own self, Mr. Faceborgberg can’t do better than an Asian 4.

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        To be fair… Zuckercuck is a jew and has no game.

        So there is that. Which is nice.

        US Open Caddyshack rape!

        Like

    • Cracker says:

      ‘Prole women care more about what you look like and your ability to beat the crap out of any rival.’

      this line is absolutely true from what i’ve observed. less intelligent and/or lower class girls are always drawn to looks for exactly the reason you mention. higher class smart girls are more attracted to personality, intelligence, etc.

      that’s why all the low class girls are the ones on social media posting pics of hot fireman and cowboys or shirtless pics of benedict cumberbatch and channing tatum while the high quality girls swoon over charismatic funny or smart men who don’t necessarily have much in the looks department.

      Like

      • Lord of the Gulf Stream says:

        the high quality girls swoon over charismatic funny or smart men who don’t necessarily have much in the looks department.

        Like who?

        Like

      • ‘the high quality girls swoon over charismatic funny or smart men who don’t necessarily have much in the looks department.

        Like who?’

        Ryan Reynolds
        Chris Pratt
        Ryan Gosling

        Like

  20. Les Saunders, Protestant says:

    Goys,

    This photo was poasted by some sort of up and coming alt lightress; it’s a stark reminder that slobbering betatude is still widespread in the current year. While most of these syncophants don’t know this girl from, ahem, a hole in the ground, this behaviour is rampant among faceberg friends who in fact are acquainted in real life. Never, ever compliment a woman on social media (and spare the compliments offline, too), especially if you hope to bang her any time.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DCd9tW6UAAAfod5?format=jpg&name=large

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      She looks like a yenta to me… a slightly more presentable Sarah Silverman.

      Like

      • tomjones says:

        Let’s not go crazy now.

        Eliot supports evil murderers (like Anders B.) who MURDER WHITE CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS 14.

        Maybe when it comes to something as serious as a future for WHITE children we shouldn’t trust faggots like Eliot.

        ‘I don’t blame women for mudsharking after seeing this’ that was obviously a rhetorical statement. he didn’t mean real mudsharkin’.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I never said anything about Brevik except that he pulled off a black op worthy of mention in ANY military history discussion.

        You clowns who cry like the (((MSM))) about how he “murdered children” are stooges for the Synathedral.

        You think the Reds, in their takeovers, didn’t kill the women and children of their enemies? Especially the young teens and adults being schooled in the ways of their Establishment parents who were controlling things before said revolutions?

        Grow the fuck up and read a book on occasion. Christ, it’s like talking to children here.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        ‘I don’t blame women for mudsharking after seeing this’ that was obviously a rhetorical statement. he didn’t mean real mudsharkin’.

        Hey fuckwit, when are you going to learn to read before you shoot off your yap?

        I said clearly it was an “offhand comment”, but even offhand comments can aid and abet the psyops of those even YOU claim to be our enemies.

        Then again, it seems that’s just squid ink of making the right noises by your ilk, until you can let your true freak flags fly.

        Now go play in traffic, numbskull.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Breivik did yeoman’s work. Just imagine what a squad of Breiviks could have done.

        Like

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        I scrolled through all 77 Brievik victims. You’d think that out of a large group of Norwegian teens there’d be some real cuties, but nope. Barely a dozen looked like normal, healthy kids. The rest all had Liberal-Loser-Face or were poz.

        Like

    • Les Saunders, Protestant says:

      She’s a wop. Sicilian likely.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        It’s a shame our Italian friends often get mistaken for The Other.

        Then again, they WERE brothers in crime, coming off the boats circa 1920’s.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Because non-Italians were never involved in organized crime. /eyeroll

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Really? Did I say it was ONLY Sicilians and Jews?

        The point remains, when talking about organized crime to this day, who ELSE are you going to say were the kingpins?

        I swear, the obtuseness of some of youse yeggs is enough to piss off a saint.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

    • itsme says:

      she looks borderline anorexic. look at her legs…

      Liked by 1 person

    • plumpjack says:

      she shoulda cropped that foot out. reminds me of this movie from when I was a kid:

      Liked by 1 person

  21. Vagina dominator says:

    I imagine you have all heard about this by now, the passing in Canada of Bill C-16 which mandates the use of “genderless pronouns on request.”

    Again, by itself just another small insult. But it is intended to be (our) death by 1000 cuts.

    If you “misgender” someone, you may now in Canada face a federal tribunal and be subject to fines and imprisonment for contempt of court.

    @ wolfie
    The people who demand such laws and see them passed and enforced are *exactly* that class of people whom Breivik targeted.

    His choice of target was without question correct. No alt-right man missed out on breeding white children just because Breivik wiped out those egg-carriers.

    Breivik is a great, great man.

    dailywesternerdotcom/news/2017-06-16/canada-goes-full-retard-passes-law-criminalizing-denial-of-gender-theory/

    Liked by 1 person

    • tomjones says:

      Brevik is a loser. He was a repressed homo. Case closed.

      He was the Scandinavian Timothy McVeigh or the Scandinavian Mohamed Atta.

      ‘Most who knew McVeigh remember him as being very shy and withdrawn, while a few described him as an outgoing and playful child who withdrew as an adolescent. McVeigh is said to have had only one girlfriend during his early childhood; he later stated to journalists that he did not have any idea how to impress girl.’

      ‘By early 1993, Atta had moved into university housing, sharing an apartment in Centrumshaus with two roommates. He remained at Centrumshaus until 1998. During that time, his roommates became frustrated with Atta, who seldom cleaned, and kept to himself to the extent that he would walk in and out of a room without acknowledging others. Beyond anything else, they could not deal with Atta’s personality, described as “complete, almost aggressive insularity”‘

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Timothy McVeigh is a saint.

        And tomjones is a parasite.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        A “hook” worm.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Brevik is a loser. He was a repressed homo. Case closed.

        The usual philistine and myopic view from our resident historian.

        It’s bad enough you can’t think in three dimensions, but when you start in not even hitting a second dimension… and with the insistence of nevertheless voicing your unschooled opinion, well… there ain’t enough haids in the world to shake.

        If the war Brevik was fighting had been officially declared at the time, he would have been hailed as a black ops specialist extraordinaire.

        You think the Reds didn’t have hundreds of these type of guys killing potential enemies since the days of Lenin?

        You short-sighted fool. Close your yap on the subjects of which you’re embarrassingly ignorant.

        Like

      • tomjones says:

        ‘If the war Brevik was fighting had been officially declared at the time, he would have been hailed as a black ops specialist extraordinaire.’

        I spoke with a Swedish far-right guy and he said Mr. Anders Behring Breivik’s actions have made it HARDER to talk about immigration in Scandinavia and Germany (from an anti-immigrant POV)

        Any white guy in Oslo or Stockholm who even suggests there might be too many ay-rabs is immediately accused being another ‘Breivik’.The name ‘Breivik’ now has replaced ‘Quisling’. typical liberal/centrist says “you want to restrict immigration? you’re an evil Breivik!”

        You also forgot something: BREIVIK KILLED 69 PURE ARYAN WHITE PEOPLE (okay, maybe one or two were second-generation brown individuals). His victims were white. as young as 14.

        McVeigh killed 168 (most of them were WHITE, including 19 children)

        You fucking scumbags!

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Study some warfare for a change, instead of mewling here like some shitlib panty-waist.

        Or be consistent, and cry a few of those alligator tears for the collateral damage in women and children’s blood that Uncle Sam has all over his hands.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        jones, you asshole, you can’t have it both ways.

        You never cease to tell us how White folks are responsible for the problems we face to today, and yet when someone targets the young lions and lionesses of those White traitors, you cry about “murdered pure Aryan children” who were in an indoctrination summer camp, on the way to becoming those selfsame traitors.

        You are one hypocritical, disingenuous, pussilanimous pismire of a shill. 😡

        Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        tomjones response is interestingly passionate.

        He is alarmed by Saint Anders’ strategy and does not want his example to be followed. That should be a clue to whether or not Breivik was on the right track.

        With the globalists, it’s always “Let’s you and him fight.” They don’t like it so much when the war is brought home to them.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Sentient says:

        How many children have the Isrealis killed Jonesy?

        Like

      • tomjones says:

        ‘How many children have the Isrealis killed Jonesy?’

        I DON’T GIVE a fuck about ARAB CHILDREN. I DON’T GIVE a fuck about INDIAN CHILDREN. I DON’T GIVE a fuck about BROWN CHILDREN.

        Jesus, are you a WHITE nationalist or not?!?!

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        So your Jews don’t kill whites?

        Like

    • Les Saunders, Protestant says:

      Fugggg.
      Maybe Trump and Turdeau can draft a big, beautiful exchange program. American libtards can surrender their US citizenship to live in SJW heaven of Canada, and in exchange, conservative Canadians get a green card and concealed carry permit on arrival.
      Canada’s a nice country, but I really think we’re fubar’d. All the work of my ancestors; clearing land, building prosperity, dying on European battlefields: all down the drain so we could turn Toronto into Bramladesh* and Vancouver into Hongkouver.
      I’d be tearing up my Canuck passport, out the door and buying land in North Carolina before you could say Tim Horton’s.

      *Sprawling suburbs of Toronto that are virtually 100% south Asian.

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Throw in Alberta, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan and its a deal. Justine doesn’t want them anyway. You guys could use them to far greater advantage.

        Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      The people Breivik k1ll3d were White Norwegian teens.
      There is N O excuse for k1ll1ng White Norwegian teens.
      I don’t care if they were communists preparing the mudsharkopalypse Caliphate, they were K1DS!
      K1ds can be saved.
      Might be difficult, might be a struggle, you might not be able to save all of them from the various mind viruses they were deliberately infected with from before b1rth, but YOU HAVE TO TRY.
      You can’t save the old ones, the ones who will be stuck on the same broken record for the rest of their days, the ones who think of Breivik as some sort of ‘hero’ because he considered himself a representative of their favorite Middle Eastern cult – but you can usually save the young.
      Breivik could have done a lot of things to prevent Oslo from turning into Djibouti – instead, he g_nn3d down his own.
      May he rot in Cuckstian he11.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        As usual, you and no-bones are in violent agreement, go figger.

        Nobody wishes ANYONE to perish, especially our own kind… much like we wish we didn’t have a buttload of our own helping the enemy.

        Much like the Lord wishes all to come to salvation, and that none shall perish.

        But the satanic rot is what it is… and as Scripture tells us, when the parents eat sour grapes, the children’s teeth are set on edge… and fully one-third of all flesh will indeed perish.

        But if you think there’s going to be a future for White children without some brutal culling of those same genetics and environment that produced their parents, well… just go back to your loved Egyptian night…

        … and take no-bones with you.

        Liked by 1 person

      • tomjones says:

        This is the greatest comment of all time.

        Whites Kids (I don’t care if their parents are Stalinists or Satanists) can be saved. YOU HAVE TO TRY to save them.

        Otherwise, you alt-right “warriors” might as well as be working for Hibatullah Akhundzada, Omar al-Bashir and Shimon Peres…

        Liked by 1 person

  22. Anonymous says:

    Off-topic, but… Hey hey hey, hung jury! Bill Cosby celebrates mistrial:

    Like

    • The left was happy to toss Cosby overboard for his (ahem) blackpilling (yeah???).

      The media has never once mentioned that a black man raped dozens of white women. No racial aspect to this whatsoever. Meanwhile; a beaner cop shoots a dindu – oh boy! Time to get on my knees and apologize.

      Like

      • melmoth says:

        He didn’t rape anyone. It was the seventies. They took pills in his apartment of their own volition. Who gives a shit?

        Like

  23. ML says:

    Too much is made of thinness, as if life were a men’s magazine.

    Lupita’s children inherit the earth because she’s a stout peasant. We all know this.

    There’s an obvious trade-off between beauty and utility, at least these days.

    The more you fetishize muh thin girls, the more steam you give to the engine of dispossession.

    Like

    • Ironsides says:

      Reluctantly forced to agree, at least from observation. In this area, at least, among whites (which is almost all there is), 80% of mothers visible on the streets and in the shops are anywhere from chunky to obese; 20% are regular build.

      The demographic salvation of our race, if it comes from anywhere, is going to come from fat, plain wenches and regular guys with strong stomachs.

      Like

      • tomjones says:

        This.

        Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        Good news:
        I went to get my raw milk today, saw a young White f@mbly (bearded farmer type guy, cute blonde w1f3 with cute blonde d@ught3r) and another cute light brunette girl with a blonde d@ught3r, all thin.

        Like

      • melmoth says:

        The fact that your spotting of a healthy family is ‘good news’ and worthy of a post says it all. It’s like trying to enlighten a blue pill American buddy who has never travelled abroad about how much more ass there is out in the wide world.

        “Whattya mean? I saw a nice looking girl at the mall two weeks ago.”

        Like

    • Lord of the Gulf Stream says:

      There is no utility to being a fat slob. It is a severe disadvantage reproductively and by any health biometric. Women are not plow horses, “stout peasant” means nothing. Even back in agrarian times, when women had to do actual work, women were not automatically fat. Being fat does not help anything in any way. Fat people were literally circus freaks.

      Like

    • melmoth says:

      Did you really say “fetishize thin girls”?

      Ha ha. Tough sledding ahead boys. Now it’s a ‘fetish’ to even expect women to be healthy.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Malcer says:

      Hey there cuck.

      Like

    • Malcer says:

      This is what feminists actually believe.

      Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      “Jemma Beale, 25, twice told juries Mahan Cassim raped her after giving her a lift home in November 2010.

      Beale said she was a lesbian with ‘no desire’ to have sex with men and Mr Cassim was jailed for seven years following a retrial at Isleworth Crown Court in January 2012.

      Beale then told police she was groped by stranger Noam Shazad in a pub in July 2011 and he then took part in a gang rape attack involving ‘sexual violence of a most serious kind’.

      Mr Shazad skipped bail and fled the country after being charged with sexual assault, the court heard.”

      Now now, we’re talking about muslim men here. She could very well be telling the truth. Except that she enjoyed it. lzozlzozl

      Like

  24. Haven M. says:

    reminds me of anna farris and chris whatshisname. She used to be fucking tight. Chris is variable, eh? He can quit beer and become a movie star or chunk it up and be a sitcom guy. But before pratt became really famous he waas fat and Anna F was white hot in the house bunny and what’s your number (which I think is a kind of funny red pill movie).

    Like

  25. gig says:

    When I become Emperor, all AIDS drugs will be forbidden forcing the freaks to move to somewhere else, and diabetics drugs will be severely taxed, plus fat people will be forced to pay huge extra premiums for healthcare

    Like

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion