What other conclusion are we to draw when the voting behavior and opinions of single White women corroborates exactly what this post’s title asserts? From Bigly E, another id-buster post that reveals a leetle too much about the vagoconductive currents that emanate from single White women’s hindbrains.
Single white women are more opposed to a big, beautiful wall than Asians, blacks, or even Hispanics are.
*twatpalm*
Single White women are, presumably for those of them who still have a bit of bloom on the rose, actively trawling the sexual market for cad and cavalier. Thus, they are in their stage of life when all faculties, mental, emotional, libidinal, are focused to a pinpoint of estrogenic vitality, with the familiar shit-testing behavioral profile that vitality presupposes.
This means, single White women are limbically primed to be aroused by dominance and a ZFG attitude in men, and those men who fall short in these traits are dumped into the beta orbiter/friendzone with a quickness, when they aren’t rejected outright. The dumping can be literal, or metaphorical, as in a political friendzoning that weakens the electoral power of White men.
As a social phenomenon, a large chunk of America’s White men have spectacularly failed the dominance/ZFG test. America the Shitlib Feminist Shrike has effectively neutered White men, and unmasked them for romantically unappealing doormats to single White women. As women are wont by the essence of their sex to spread their legs for the dominant tribe’s men, they will wish to see tribal battles play out so that they may enjoy the luxury of choosing winners and their winning seed. The single White woman desire for open borders is nothing less than a desire for alpha male interlopers to test the mettle of their betatized male loafers. A massive civilizational shit test, if you will.
For this reason, it was always a mistake to entrust the nation’s future to its native daughters, especially while in their pulchritudinous primes. Women are more xenophilic than men and this difference goes deep, all the way to the Darwinian pulses in the primal part of the brain that regulate reproductive algorithms. No logic, reason, accountability, or basic common sense can defeat such a primitive force.
There aren’t many solutions to this intractable cognitive block in women’s hindbrains that don’t require serious divestment from the recently operative political and social calculus. Off the top of my head, here are solutions that would work (but just try hurdling the independent variables on your way to a solvable equation):
- rescind suffrage and disenfranchise single White women
- get more White women married off and pregnant at younger ages
- break America into regional entities, diluting the single White woman vote
- convince married White women to socially ostracize single White women by any means necessary
- make divorce harder for women
- economically and socially incentivize early marriage (e.g., conduct a massive draw-down of women from the workforce and cease glorifying single momhood and tankgrrl careerism)
- ban abortion and contraceptives (good luck with that)
- execute a vast, mass propaganda psy ops involving reframing of contentious national question issues and other rhetorical gambits that constitute the heart of Game to reorient the acceptable opinion avenues by which single White women gain social status rewards so that they find value in claiming the opposite of the self-defeating open borders beliefs they comfortingly regurgitate for now. (whether he knows it or not, this is the Trump Option.)
I welcome further suggestions from the commentariat.
An “overfeed the beast” strategy that I sometimes see entertained by crueler elements in the Exasperated-Right won’t work; if you dump millions of Dirt World trashkin into single White women playgrounds, all that will accomplish is an increase in the murder, rape… and miscegenation rates. The bleeding heart politics of these dumb bunnies won’t move an iota. No, the way forward is for White men to retake control of their homeland and scoff at the precious political boilerplate their women solipsistically indulge.
I can tell you that if we refuse to tackle our shared single White women problem, the nonWhite invaders will tackle the problem for us. And the way they solve it won’t abide feminist SWPL rules of conduct.
PS Cough up your black pills, because Trump’s firing of Comey may have opened the way to renew the investigation of thecunt’s email case while at State. I told you guys Comey was a lackey for thecunt. Get rid of him, and thecunt will start thinking about getaway plans to safe havens.
***
PA suggests motives for the single White woman signaling for open borders.
— The single White woman desire for open borders is nothing less than a desire for alpha male interlopers to test the mettle of their betatized male loafers.
Yes, I agree. Other reasons why normal young single White females (as opposed to gutter-grade trigglypuffs) think they want open borders, along with my estimate of the likelihood of that being one of their motives:
To enjoy brown d_ck: 5%
To have a mixed baby: 0%
To be on the top of an even taller female SMV pyramid: 90%
To increase the likelihood of *other* White women getting r_ped, k_lled, or kn_cked up by browns: a sobering 75%
To virtue-signal (read: follow a fashion) that they don’t yet know is about to go out of style: 100%
Female Suffrage. A mistake that will not be made again.
I meant to bring up this point in the body of the post, but PA’s #3 reason — to enjoy the instant social status ladder climb from importing a vast bottomfeeder population of lower SMV women and men — is probably the most subconsciously pertinent (and least remarked upon) motivation to single White women.
Myself? I think that there is no solution and we’re just screwed.
I can’t give up the struggle, but at the same time, there’s no perceptible way to win it. History is littered with extinct species; it appears it’s our turn.
LikeLike
There’s a character in the historical novel A Struggle For Rome… he’s a Gothic chieftain based upon an actual historical hero who fought like a lion for hours against the Byzantine/Roman Army sent to drive the Goths out of Italy. Strabo wrote about it all, if memory serves.
Anyway, this Teja, early on at a meeting of chieftains, was the lone voice of doom when others were considering the strength of their position on the Italian peninsula… yet all knew that he would be the one who fought the most valiantly, to the last, despite his pessimism.
There are many, some even here at the chateau, who can identify with that weight of sadness… and resolve.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I misspoke, I meant the historian Procopius,not Strabo. The author of the historical novel is Felix Dahn, for those of curiosity.
LikeLike
Check that… Procopius, not Strabo.
LikeLike
@Greg Eliot: The Roman Empire’s pro-enslavement policy did not cause captive women to be mistreated. Modern Islam is more discriminatory than the Romans ever were. Do you feel that the U.S. should dial back the clock on women’s rights?
LikeLike
Who are you and what have you done with the Church Lady ?
Good post.
LikeLike
Greg you waste your talents duking it out with other readers. This is good shit.
LikeLike
My take is nothing to fear. Whites are already a minority — only 15% of the world.
Intelligence ALWAYS WINS. In a mud future, no matter how many whites there are, they will always dominate the rest. Niggs/spics/muzzies will be the manual labor grunts, while whites invent important things. Numbers never mattered in war. Think about a few hundred conquistadors defeating hordes of natives and taking their gold.
Winners will be Russia, Israel and Japan.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Whites have always been a minority -true, but if the enemy get their way (which right now they are), there won’t be ANY White people left.
There are Semito-African ‘immigrants’ even in Iceland and the very north of Norway.
Guess what they’re doing there.
Chasing White tail, just like Coudenhove-Kalergi-Morgenthau-Giscrad d’Estaing-Kohl-Merkel-Macron want them to.
Russia already has a larger Moslem population than all of western Europe put together, that’s been like that for hundreds of years.
Stop looking to them for salvation, we have to clean up our own damn yards and it’s gonna get M E S S Y.
Japan is aging and well below replacement level just like Europe.
Isra3l can go back to he11.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t agree the outlook is completely bleak. A quick search of “online dating is racist” reveals White Women still strongly prefer White Men and discriminate against googles and Asians (even more so). How to reconcile? Virtue signaling?
LikeLike
Online ‘dating’ consists of about 99.9999999% l1es and sc@ms.
Why should White women’s supposed ‘preferences’ be any different ?
LikeLike
No Sir, I do not accept that. I do not accept the possibility of defeat. I simply don’t!
It will be our decision, and our decision only. Let us get back to basics.
We are stronger than women, period. They can do what they do because we let them. Our ancestors were fully aware of the true nature of women, and they could control it. Are we less then them? Let us put them back to their place, they are practically begging us for it.
As for the remaining enemies? Jewboys who do not even lift, prancing fags and trannies, and colored savages? Give me a fucking break. Nobody does ethnic cleansing like we, White men do.
We fucking KNOW the solution, do not tell me otherwise. If you tell me you have no clue what the solution might be, I will call you a liar.
Deep down you know. Deep down you always knew. Tell me you don’t, I dare you, I double dare you!
YOU KNOW!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is it true that Jews don’t lift? I am Jewish and have never lifted a weight in my life. Why don’t Jews like to get physically fit? Please answer without being mean.
LikeLike
Jay Fink
Jews concentrate on brains and education in 100%, I think that is the reason why they do not lift, and also the reason why they rule the world now. with their money they can buy the women they want, they do not have to look sexy to fuck, they have the shekels for the shiksas. that is the only idea I can come up with.
You tell me why Jews don’t lift? Also I am sure the Israeli army guys do lift.
LikeLike
Oh, that’s definitely the solution; getting our women back under control, and evicting all the foreign invaders, mudsharks, and mystery meat en masse. You won’t find any argument from me there.
The problem is that there are like 50 million white guys with f1re@rms in between us and regaining control over our nations. Mind you, I’m kind of a 2nd Amendment fellow myself, but I also realize that most of the unofficial and ALL of the official w@rri0rs in our countries are dedicated to keeping anything like that from happening.
The only way out I can see is total collapse of the system followed by a quasi Mad Max period, minus the deserts and tiny population.
LikeLike
@warriorhun
I guess that’s all there is to it but this goes way back. I was reading an article about the historic mating patterns of Ashkenazi Jews. Jews were so physically weak a couple hundred years ago that a full 50% of Jewish men were rejected by the Russian army. Apparently back then the Russians were outraged at how “puny” Jewish men were. Interestingly I don’t feel any outrage today. I’m a pretty small guy and no one seems to care.
LikeLike
@ Jay Fink
It is not as if Askhenazi Jews really wanted to fight for Russia, right?
Maybe it was a clever choice by them back then, not to lift or excercise their bodies, so as they could avoid conscription and having to go to war for interests other than that of their own tribe.
Later on, in the Bolshevik Revolution, and even later when Israel was born, that attitude changed, and Jewish warriors emerged.
But in the majority of present day Jewish men, the old school of thinking about physical excercise still have its hold.
LikeLike
@ Ironsides
It all starts with our own lives. We lead and influence others by example.
We treat the women in our lives according to our standards, and we reject all Feminist influences.
And we all speak our minds without PC self-cenzorship.
We work, we train, we read, we learn.
We raise families, and we instill in our children our values.
And when we will hear the drums, we will go to war.
There are more of us than you would believe. Remember before Trump? Every one of us thought we are all alone, and everybody else is crazy and stupid. Just a few individuals fighting a hopeless battle lost long ago, and others are so brainwashed that they do not even notice.
It was not so.
Most of the people were just playing along, paying lip service, wanting to get by, earn a living to make ends meet.
Everybody was all-PC, because nobody wanted to lose money because of bitches, fags, kikes and jigaboos.
But when the chance came to express their true thoughts and feelings, oh boy did the Earth tremble?
From the silence, the enemy read their brainwashing was complete, that the status quo is based on unshakable consensus.
Most of the Liberal-Bolsheviks still do not understand what hit them.
This will get better and better. We are living historical times. The patriarchy of the straight, white male will return with a vengeance. We were good for too long. Time to be bad again and conquer the world.
LikeLike
Good point my fellow goyim. We should all just take the blackpill, like good goys and let (((them))) have (((their))) world since it is our town to go extinct apparently.
LikeLike
The JIDF/Mossad invests enormous resources in demoralization campaigns.
LikeLike
Prepare, go poolside, and pray.
LikeLike
Slap the women, gas the muds. Either socially/financially or the literal way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
CH: “Women are more xenophilic than men and this difference goes deep, all they way to the Darwinian pulses in the primal part of the brain that regulate reproductive algorithms.”
Just the other day, it dawned on me that this Invade/Invite Masculine/Feminine dichotomy has a pretty obvious explanation in biology, namely as a Darwinian survival mechanism to compensate for inbreeding within the [respective] native populations.
For instance, I’ve long thought that jewesses are so open to us [White Alpha Cads] because their hamsters [hindbrains] are being driven neurotic & schizophrenic & psychotic from worrying to death about how badly inbred their jew bloodlines have become.
We in the West once had a civilization & a culture in which FATHERS helped screen their daughters’ suitors so as to make certain that their daughters’ innate hypergamy [and desire for new DNA in the bloodlines] was being steered towards breeding UP, rather than breeding DOWN.
But of course The Frankfurt School has long since destroyed those cultural bulwarks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
PS: An indefatigable Darwinian Nihilist [like John Cuckbyshire] would argue that the Darwinian definition of breeding “up” is precisely that the progeny survive to create progeny of their own, and that the Darwinian definition of breeding “down” would necessarily imply that the progeny tend to drift into extinction.
But of course Darwinian Nihilism makes no room for concepts such as Beauty or Truth or Grace.
LikeLike
Would you want to have to look at this during s3x ?
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse3.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.UTC_-JW5v23En6zxXY3umQDIEs%26pid%3D15.1&f=1
LikeLike
American blacks have to be the stupidest creatures on earth. Here’s a policy (the wall) that would demonstrably improve their lives by raising wages on shitty work and easing the cleansing of Compton and other areas where blacks have been shoved out by Mexicans.
And yet, they vote against their interests, because they’re 1) stupid and 2) indoctrinated with so much hate for whites that they’re incapable of seeing layers of complexity, which is precisely what the American ethnic situation is right now.
LikeLiked by 3 people
The hallmark… Big Tell, if you will… of evil is that it will cut off it’s own nose to spite its face, so long as the blood messes up everything else in the area.
LikeLike
“And yet, they vote against their interests, because they’re 1) stupid and 2) indoctrinated with so much hate for whites that they’re incapable of seeing layers of complexity, which is precisely what the American ethnic situation is right now.”
Sounds like white women
LikeLiked by 1 person
“improve their lives by raising wages on shitty work”
What work would that be, exactly?
LikeLike
Cleanin’ dem bedpanz in da White Man hospital.
LikeLike
Black man be wantin’ twelve dollah uh hour fo dat sh!t.
Mexican be doin’ it fo’ seben dollah uh hour.
LikeLike
I think they’re still clinging to the outdated assumption trumpeted by the likes of Jesse Jackson, of a “rainbow coalition” – or basically all the races of the earth united to take down and extract resources from whitey (with a few useful idiot qhite quislings thrown in for optics), fronted by themselves, natch. They are still waking up to the fact that the browns aren’t too keen on them, as the well-documented ethnic cleansing in LA demonstrates.
LikeLike
Ironically enough considering black people have effectively done it to the other races a time or two over the years in the US.
People forget what they did to the koreans during the LA riots.
LikeLike
Dey donts want to work.
LikeLike
Even if they don’t, they still have to do something. Deal drugs? Mexicans hurt their profits there too, by flooding the market with cheap junk and muscling in on their turf. Again, NOT voting their interests.
LikeLike
Certainly a continual battle.. as there are never-ending structural efforts to encourage their welcome of assimilation, especially in Europe, e.g. https://fluechtlinge-mitnehmen.de (in German)
LikeLike
The problem with modern societies is they lack a central nexus point. Think of the French Academy that regulates language for France. That’s a C.N.P.
To take care of women and put them in their place, you need a central nexus point for all of modern society making the decisions and fixed in place for long periods of time. Its only expiration date should be when it makes way for a later strong nexus.
LikeLike
“Its only expiration date should be when it makes way for a later strong nexus.”
Kinda like how The Frankfurt School moved in and replaced the Christian clergy.
LikeLike
I guess “freedom” and a “central nexus point” can’t coexist.
LikeLike
PS Cough up your black pills, because Trump’s firing of Comey may have opened the way to renew the investigation of thecunt’s email case while at State. I told you guys Comey was a lackey for thecunt. Get rid of him, and thecunt will start thinking about getaway plans to safe havens.
Every damn newspaper on the stand this morning was trumpeting the muh Russian influence tale as the impetus for Trump’s action… and making noises about “questions that MUST be answered”, “special prosecutors”, muh Nixon resignation, etc., etc., etc.
The time to put the hammer down on these yellow journalists is LONG overdue. 😡
Curious to see who gets tagged as Comey’s replacement.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amaze-balls, as I’m sure those newspapers back in October/November were agreeing with the Dems that Comey needed to go since he had “reopened” that Hillary email investigation.
For those of us who’s eyes are wide open, it’s clear as day to see the blatant hypocrisy on stage. For those who might be a bit bleary eyed, I’m sure it’s starting to come into focus for them. And if it ain’t, not much help for those poor bastards who can’t see the writing on the wall.
LikeLike
As to Comey’s replacement: My pick would be Giuliani or Andy McCarthy, and then sit back and enjoy the lamentations of the left.
LikeLike
I can’t see Guiliani as FBI Director. Is he qualified for the position?
I mean, not that Comey did a bang up job.
LikeLike
Give Christie the job.
LikeLike
On teh Facebook, I’ve noticed that women are much more likely to accept friends requests from me than men are if we have no (or one, or two) mutual friends. With men, you have to be in the same circle (tribe?) in some way. For women, though, it appears to be unnecessary.
LikeLike
For women, collecting friends and likes on Faceborg is like kids collecting baseball cards or marbles.
Whoever has the most, wins.
LikeLike
Sure, but you still have to be hawt.
LikeLike
“You mean you want to sleep with a woman just because she’s beautiful?”
“Naw, we pretty much want to nail the ugly ones, too.”
LikeLike
Sexual shaming is probably the most effective legal means at our disposal, aimed at both numales and globowhores. It’s easy to come up with different ways to shame their choices, because they are…shameful.
The problem is that shaming falls flat if the shamer is seen as weak, inferior, or worst of all jealous & bitter. If you are fat, skinny, or skinny-fat, it won’t work.
So our mission is to get in the best shape of our lives, dress like winners, make a lot of cash, and then shame the hell out of these pathetic losers of the Sexual Marketplace. Along the way you can sharpen your shivs at the Chateau.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sexual shaming is an intra-woman phenomenon. It’s not men who attack women for easy sex, by and large — it’s competing women who don’t want their prudish pussy value devalued.
It only takes a few slutty women to destroy the bottleneck on sex that the vast majority of women represent. When I fucked a girl in her bedroom on UBC campus, I was very careful that her “friends” on the same floor never found out. She would have been ostracized and burnt and that might have taken out the future sex flow.
LikeLike
Completely agree. Recent example. At a bar (or anywhere for that matter) I always ping for mud shark sensitivity by picking any physical characteristic and then remarking, “I bet the black guys are all over you.”
Recently said something similar at a table with two young white chicks. The friend (unattractive) shot back with indoctrinated platitude, “Who are you to judge who she’s been with?!”
I just shrugged, smiled, and locked eye contact. “No judgement. Just a quick way for me to lose interest.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
“The friend (unattractive)” == the c0ck bl0cker
LikeLike
Except that her c0ck-bl0cking-fu was pwned by your Game-fu.
[Although, technically speaking, she DID bl0ck your c0ck. Hmmm. I’m gonna hafta ponder that one.]
LikeLike
Yeah, that kind of thing. Also saying things like ‘You just want more immigrants so you can get laid,huh?’ in a joking-but-not-really tone, while looking her up and down with a smirk. Implying that they are not worthy of a good white man and have to go slumming to get anyone interested in them. It’s all true and it hits them hard because they know it.
With men it’s almost too easy. Just point out their horrific sex life and all the tatted fatties and smug fuglies they’ve been banging, and tell them it’s because they’re a beta simp. Again, it hits like a ton of bricks because it’s true.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Captain – I’m a new poster, so in the spirit of full disclosure, yes. All true. Lost that one.
@Freeman – hahahahah. I am going to steal that line and pretend I came up with it.
LikeLike
But what’s so bizarre about this interaction iss that usually the c0ck-bl0cker wins by proving you unworthy of her mistress, but here the c0ck-bl0cker won by proving her mistress unworthy of you.
My head is kinda spinning from thinking about this.
LikeLike
I wonder what occurred in the c0ck-bl0cker’s forebrain or her hindbrain to allow her to transform from disqualifying you to disqualifying her mistress?
And WTF is the evolutionary purpose of the c0ck-bl0cker in the first place? It feels like the behavior of social insects, with the worker drone throwing down its own life to save the life of its queen.
Or maybe the C0ck-Bl0cker is the female equivalent of the male Beta Orbiter, only she’s trying to get close enough to Alpha Seed to be able to steal [from her mistress] a mercy ph*ck every once in while?
LikeLike
Seriously, though..
What the fuck is wrong with blacks? Are they really that retarded? A porous border is a bad deal for them.
[CH: i think for blacks it basically comes down to “what will screw whitey the most? we want more of that!”]
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s true. They call the Vibrant Sun People their “brown brothers and sisters”, and it’s not just the politicians who say that at election time.
Remember, blacks as a group are not future oriented (which they call “acting white” because it confounds their limited group cognitive ability); there is only screw whitey now, and then blame whitey for what they do to each other and their own neighborhoods.
LikeLike
Nah blacks aren’t out for anyone but themselves and yes they are that retarded. Their only role in this democracy has always been as warm bodies to vote for liberals.
LikeLike
“[CH: i think for blacks it basically comes down to “what will screw whitey the most? we want more of that!”]”
Ever run into some submissive dork who looks upon you as the greatest thing for whatever reason, and you just instinctively hate him?
I suspect that’s how blacks view whites. The fact that they are most like this toward white shitlibs is perhaps the biggest reason I suspect this.
LikeLike
I might be optimistic in my viewpoint about this, but I think #8 is underway, what with this site, some maul-right twatter feeds, 4chan and DS to name a few.
Likewise, we need to make men manly again, instead of these pansy assed manginas, with their low-T, pussy worshipping.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I try to write articles on my website (click my name to visit) that fit this description. One thing I find that works is when you concentrate on your darker emotions. This releases a flow in your works and articles unbeatable.
LikeLike
[…] Single White Women Want To Spread Their Legs For The World […]
LikeLike
Fascinating video on this topic. I think readers here would appreciate it.
— https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow… great video.
Should be re-named “red pill primer”.
LikeLiked by 2 people
— The single White woman desire for open borders is nothing less than a desire for alpha male interlopers to test the mettle of their betatized male loafers.
Yes, I agree. Other reasons why normal young single White females (as opposed to gutter-grade trigglypuffs) think they want open borders, along with my estimate of the likelihood of that being one of their motives:
To enjoy brown d_ck: 5%
To have a mixed baby: 0%
To be on the top of an even taller female SMV pyramid: 90%
To increase the likelihood of *other* White women getting r_ped, k_lled, or kn_cked up by browns: a sobering 75%
To virtue-signal (read: follow a fashion) that they don’t yet know is about to go out of style: 100%
Female Suffrage. A mistake that will not be made again.
[CH: i meant to bring up this point in the body of the post, but your #3 reason — to enjoy the instant social status ladder climb from importing a vast bottomfeeder population of lower SMV women and men — is probably the most subconsciously pertinent (and least remarked upon) motivation to single White women.]
LikeLiked by 3 people
Up above here, I’m postulating that the Invade/Invite phenomenon is probably associated with a desire to refresh the bloodlines from too much inbreeding.
[CH: white gentiles have never really had an inbreeding problem outside of rarefied royal lines. “inbreeding” is sometimes exaggerated for effect by rhetorical shysters trying to justify mass nonwhite immigration. real inbreeding problems bedevil jews, arabs, gypsies, and perhaps a long time ago some small hillbilly communities.]
LikeLiked by 1 person
For instance, if a White girl successfully gets away with mudsharkery, then her hindbrain/hamster can be congratulated for having correctly sensed that her White father was a cuck & a pu$$y & a loser, because if he had been a real man, then he would have k!lled both her & the n!gger. So the hindbrain/hamster is sensing [again correctly] that it needs to introduce some primordial violence back into the bloodlines of the family [at the obvious expense of losing about 150,000 years of breeding for intelligence, but no one ever said that the female hindbrain/hamster was future-oriented – in that sense, mudsharks & n!ggers have a lot in common].
LikeLike
CH: “white gentiles have never really had an inbreeding problem outside of rarefied royal lines.”
I don’t disagree with that. But The Frankfurt School introduced “Cultural Marxism” [sexual degeneracy, miscegenation, drug abuse, destruction of the family, an all-out war on the fledgling masculinity of young White boys, etc etc etc] as what amounted to the M0ther of All Sh!t Tests for the White Man, and many of our [ostensible] White Men buckled under the pressure of it, and failed the test, and gave up, and grew manboobs, and became glued to their couches, and started speaking in affectations & worshipping at the altar of “My Little Pony”.
And in seeing that failure [of the M0ther of All Sh!t Tests], it strikes me that many White women may have gone off in search of n!gger c0ck in order to breed some violence & psychopathy & lack-of-future-orientation back into their bloodlines.
LikeLike
I really suspect that women are most likely to invite in strangers if their men are a bunch of pansies. If the men are real men, they won’t.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“I really suspect that women are most likely to invite in strangers if their men are a bunch of pansies. If the men are real men, they won’t.”
Right, that’s my feeling, that too many of their hindbrains are sensing a need for bloodline “rejuvenation” [even if it’s devolution down at the expense of evolution up].
Because too many of their would-be [White] mates failed the M0ther of All Sh!t Tests [as posed by The Frankfurt School].
LikeLiked by 1 person
You need really small breeding pools before you worry about inbreeding. The reason it is a problem for Jews and Arabs is because they practice incest.
LikeLike
But imagine if you were a White g!rl with a fat man-b00bed cuck father like Karl Rove, and your choices for dating were either a fat man-b00bed cuck boyfriend like John Scalzi, or a thug gangsta bada$$ n!gger like Cam Newton or Jameis Winston – honestly, given those choices, I can imagine how an at-risk White hamster might choose to introduce some n!gger DNA into her family bl00dlines in order to jumpstart her progeny’s propensities for viciousness & violence & criminality & psychopathy.
LikeLike
tl;dr: If
{N!gger Game} + {Frankfurt School Poisoning} > {White Boy Game}
then
A) White Boyz need to up their Game, and
B) White Men need to start sprinkling some Zyklon B all over The Frankfurt School.
LikeLike
I have to say, White women who vote away our security, prosperity, and heritage is an abomination but understandable. That’s why we denied them suffrage for so long.
But White men who vote Trudeau, Hilldog, and Macron? Utterly contemptible muthafuckàs.
LikeLike
shit
man-boobed
nigger
mother
cock
LikeLike
I don’t buy the “importing alpha males” line of thinking. Women aren’t tripping over themselves to fuck Mexicans. I suspect it’s the same in Europe vis a vis Arabs.
There’s probably a much stupider, emotional reason like there is with everything women do.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Same here.
What comes across the border at Juarez, Mexicali or Brownsville aren’t ‘Alpha Males’ , they’re mostly little brown chicharritos who’ve been squeezed out of every peso by the coyotes and don’t even have tattoos yet.
Not exactly the type of man that jingles the cashbox of your average Norteamericana.
What drifts – or is ferried by the Norwegian, German, Greek or Italian ‘coast guard’ – across the Med consists to a very large extent of omega-ragey mama’s boys from Inbredistan or ooga-booga primitives who could be outsmarted by your average chimp.
I think the trigger mechanism are TV or magazine pictures of dark ch1ldr3n with big brown eyes – nothing opens White borders, doors and legs faster.
Why ?
Beats me, ask the women.
LikeLike
You’re right. I used to be friends with one of these weepy SWFs but she’s all but refused to speak with me since I told her (proudly) that I was for Trump. She thinks our immigration policy is fine and nothing needs to be changed. I reminded her of some salient facts — the crime, the dependency, Kate Steinle. (It’s funny how the Steinle murder really does clarify things) After which she admitted that she really “didn’t know all the details.” This is all SWF theater, a public posture done to impress their Facebook and Twatter friends. She wouldn’t date, let alone fuck, any Takfiri wife beaters or Mexican ass grabbers. But I say if they vote this way, let them experience some vibrancy.
LikeLike
A lot of European women used to go for sex holidays in North Africa, especially Egypt and Tunisia. Not so much now because of the risk of terrorism.
Illegal immigrants, mostly young men, camp out near the French port of Calais, hoping to cross the English Channel. Their poor living conditions attract charities and their “aid workers”. But 25% of the female “aid workers” are not affiliated with any charity! They, and even some of the real charity workers, are there for the exotic cock.
LikeLike
A woman with options isn’t going on sex holiday to Tunisia or volunteering at a migrant camp. This whole line of thought is kind of cucky.
LikeLike
“Women aren’t tripping over themselves to fuck Mexicans.”
yeah, I agree on this. so 73.5% of single women oppose the wall. this includes spinsters, sluts, whores, cat ladies, fuglies, lesbians, fatties, tards, negresses, and butterfaces. basically all your defective female rejects. of course they need something to fill them up, like a “good cause”.
the upside of this is that 26.5% of single females still oppose it, which is far more than the actual number of attractive females. I don’t have stats on what percentage of women are bang- or comm1tment-worthy, but I’d put that number at 5-10%. so these stats actually look pretty good.
also, those 46.9% of m@rried women who oppose are a different breed altogether. EITHER, they were “smart” and m@rried in their SMV range, and didn’t hold out for the alpha provider, OR they were part of the small fraction of high-SMV women who could snag the man they really wanted. their perception and characteristics were different from the “single women” group to start with. they’re also a more homogenous group than the reject group.
long story short, women as a group are unreliable (because feelz) and compiling statistics about them is of limited utility because they’re basically followers. these statistics probably reflect less their priorities and more what their immediate herd’s priorities are.
LikeLike
the upside of this is that 26.5% of single females *are in favor*.
LikeLike
“26.5% of single females still oppose it, which is far more than the actual number of attractive females.”
Jesus Christ; you’re right. “FAR” fewer than a 1/4 of single women are attractive. And I’m just talking about the fertile ones.
I live in D.C. so this may be skewed.
The boomer generation destroyed the social/sexual/racial contracts that had been keeping an equilibrium. I hope they live to experience the consequences.
My parents both have generous pensions, 401Ks, SS, Medicare, no debt, and massive housing equity. And they were both just middling workers.
Yet they don’t care that I will never have these things. They are focused on the welfare of muslims and blacks.
They feel guilty about whatever perceived advantages they enjoyed; and stuck future generations with the bill, plus 1000% interest.
LikeLike
*knocked
LikeLike
*raped
LikeLike
killed
LikeLike
i don’t understand why you changed r_pe, k_ll and kn_ck. wtf?
LikeLike
None of the above are needed. Just abolish alimony in all its forms. Alimony and Individual Child Support enforce broken contracts and reward poor choices.
“.. but he beat me!” You chose him.
“.. but we built a business together!” You chose him.
“…but the children!” You took them away from him.
“…I gave the best years of my life!” By your own choice.
“…but I cannot support myself!” In an economy fashioned by your own votes.
Until then, gentlemen
Have the snip, don’t marry, don’t date single moms.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Have the snip”
JIDF demoralization agent
LikeLiked by 4 people
‘Don’t date single moms’
Easier said than done, everything else is j@il bait.
Around here, even many of the single moms are j@il bait.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“many of the single moms are j@il bait”
B-b-but your honor, she’s already a friggin mudduh. Da fuq a n!gga to do?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Too bad ah ain’t no n1ggah – wouldn’t work for me.
LikeLike
I understand your pain (and some SMs are admittedly tasty).
My game plan here is: exceptions will be made for SMs who behave as if unencumbered ie turn up on time and stay late without checking watches and phones, don’t talk about the kids, etc etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
i dated a single mom like that for about year. she had a decent relationship with her ex. the kids were with him as much as they were with her so she didn’t expect me to be a dad to them. we planned our time together when the kids were with him or busy with friends most times so i hardly spent any time with them the whole year we were together.
things didn’t work out for some reasons unrelated to the kids but she was a cool lady and i give her props for handling things the way she did.
LikeLike
Laugh Dept:
Woman virtue signals hard because of Confederate Flag in a store. No one cares and in fact tell her to get lost. Woman has hysterical weeping meltdown.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Geez, Louise, what a drama queen!
The irony is she’d be the first to argue for allowing immigrants in, no questions asked, the more vibrant, the better.
Yeah, lady… these guys are “evil” and “monsters”… wait’ll you see what happens when you shoot off your mouth to Abdullah about the way he treats his w-i-f-e or the flags he displays or some such thing.
Oh, that’s right… THEN you’ll keep your yap shut be a good little Stepford citizen, amirite?
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLiked by 2 people
I laughed at the name of the store: Extreme Deals
LikeLike
Shitlords in Oregon, who knew?
LikeLiked by 2 people
And in Portland, no less!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Next time I’m in the area, I’m shopping there
LikeLiked by 2 people
And the sun was shining! WTF?!
LikeLike
Haha, i saw this earlier today, hilarious.
LikeLike
Two things:
1. Amazing how she transforms from being in attack mode when she was in the store to a sobbing, blubbering pile of excrement in the parking lot.
2. Beyond amazing how the story unfolded in her mind, with her as the victim and the men as the assailants, as opposed to the reality of what the video shows.
Her poor kids. They don’t stand a chance at having a normal life.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, it didn’t take long for the go-grrl activist to become start playing the mewling victim card.
And then to keep repeating the curse words in front of the kids.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLiked by 2 people
Guess there are some shitlords left in Portland.
LikeLike
https://twitter.com/heatherreb?lang=en
LikeLiked by 1 person
Remember several posts back, CH did a post on my comment about male vs. female handwriting, and how it is an expression of the differences in male and female brains? Well, on this silly liberal bitches’ twatter feed, she posted this (among the other disgusting liberal garbage on there), which just bolsters my argument:
Low-IQ, emotionally immature, female handwriting at its best. Even though this woman is late 20s, early 30s, you can clearly see that she never mentally matured past the 7th grade (which also explains her crying for attention – from another ‘sister’ – when she does not get her way).
LikeLiked by 2 people
And speaking of danger glasses, there is nothing about her appearance that says, “I voted Trump”. Bangable, but certified Leftist Looney.
LikeLike
LikeLike
good observation on the handwriting. she writes like a kid not like a woman.
LikeLike
every tweet is a complaint about a school district, racism, or police misconduct. something is seriously wrong with this lady.
LikeLike
Her Twitter is sad, if you think about it. She’s an example of the atomization of society. No real friends, even on Twitter, mostly just “causes” and other transactional relationships. When she made her video, it looks like she was trying to LARP the SJW fantasies she identifies with into reality.
The fact that she has two young children raises the “who bitch this is” question. No doubt, she’s either a single mother or “in a relationship” with a manlet. Either way, it does not bode well for the future of white Americans.
The men who made fun of her in the store, on the other hand, are solid.
Interesting that the newspaper that posted the video disabled comments. The manager of that channel knows she’d have her ass handed to her if comments were allowed.
Any meme artists here? She’s ripe for a public mocking.
LikeLiked by 2 people
lolololozzzzzzzzzzz…..”They’re assaulting me!!” Hurts when your bubble is burst, eh? lolololololololzzzzzzzzzz!!! All those pent up ‘Hillary lost’ tears coming out. Mmmmmmm…..they are refresing! Go find a safe space, bitch!
LikeLiked by 1 person
yeah, ‘assaulting her’
then attacking her in the parking lot too lol
LikeLike
I’d encourage everyone to head over to the yelp page of that grocery store and leave a good review of support for those heroic shitlords.
https://www.yelp.com/biz/everyday-deals-extreme-portland-2
LikeLiked by 2 people
Speaking of the Confederacy…I’m sure you guys have been following how part of Southern Heritage is being erased by the removal of statues of Davis, Lee, Beauregard etc. Predictably, now there is actually jig talk of removing all founding father statues.
What I didn’t know is that there is actually a statue of Tupac Shakur now up in Georgia, smh. A statue of Biggie Smalls is planned for Brooklyn. I’m sure there are other black entertainer, sports star memorials popping up all over the cuntry.
Oh well, file under Goodbye America.
LikeLike
Would be illuminating to see the age breakouts of the various groups here. Perhaps any wall reminds of The Wall too much?
LikeLike
9. End welfare. That will simultaneously hault mudsharking and third world invasion when the monetary incentives are removed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
HAHAHAH OMG
We finally agree on something Rosie. https://t.co/BSP5F3PgbZ
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 11, 2017
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ah, classic Trump is back.
I wonder if he push-pulled all of us, from the Syrian bombing to the firing of Comey.
His tweets as of late have been up to his usual standard of bite and shiv.
LikeLike
These single white women would not by any chance be those women who have corporate jobs, salary to match and live in white-flight-condo-land?
[CH: heh. the very same.]
LikeLike
“a political friendzoning that weakens the electoral power of White men.”
Brilliant synopsis.
LikeLike
9. Ban the fucking dating apps.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Alpha or beta?
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5913907ce4b00b643ebb12e5
[CH: well i gotta hand it to the guy, he has a flair for the dramatic. also…nine kids with four women? alpha, if the women aren’t cigstaches..]
LikeLiked by 1 person
Worships Hitler too much; part of being “Alpha” is being your own man so to speak.
He should want to replace Hitler and not just emulate him.
LikeLike
“alpha, if the women aren’t cigstaches..]”
Super-alpha, if the women were ex-Moldylockses.
LikeLike
I didn’t realize the percentage of men bundling sticks who want to slurp on foreign chorizo is 48.4%
[CH: it’ll be 0% when this blog goes national.]
LikeLike
[CH: it’ll be 0% when this blog goes national.]
When that happens, that’ll be the type of winning I won’t tire of.
LikeLike
Makes a lot of sense. Here two barren women raise awareness of how white men are depriving them of orgasms and why government intervention may be necessary to ensure equal sexual pleasure for all.
I pirated a copy of her book but it was some damn tedious reading, worse than a romance novel. Mostly about herself or her conversations with other women talking about themselves. In the epilogue “a call for action” laments that she did not include immigrant voices, such as Muzzie women who had their clits sliced off one wonders.
LikeLike
As very weird as Canada is in many ways – there is this one thing, that does occur in Canada that can works towards solution of the outlined quandary. And that is – the idea of freedom to choose one’s own way, freedom to choose one’s own brand of personal expression, freedom to make up one’s own mind free from the tyranny of coercion – is something that is valued in real pragmatic terms in Canada. The key pragmatic expression of that means a man (any man) should be free to go wherever he chooses within the commons (which in Canada are vast), within the areas of public domain, without cowering in response to tribal territorial dominance hierarchies (except by way of territories especially protected by the state, such as military installations, police stations, courthouses and the like, for which clear rules of engagement are known to all – so engagement within such state protected areas doesn’t really equate to cowering, and the impetus for state protection of said areas certainly are not tribal). For most areas of the commons, – the public domain of streets, roadways, and common grounds within neighbourhoods, this freedom for a man to go wherever he chooses without cowering in response to territorial dominance hierarchies – means 24 hours day. Ditto for all neighbourhood retail businesses (respecting the business’ operating hours of course).
Canadian men do not tolerate limits on masculine freedom of movement due to tribal territorial dominance hierarchies. There is big pushback on that whenever it is insinuated here. Want to get your average Canadian man angry? – if the tribalism that is always present in any event, rises to the level of limiting freedom of masculine movement – that be grounds for major freak-out in Canada.
Of course there are tribal enclaves in Canada (care of multiculturalism), but ….. that no-go zone shit that occurs in parts of Europe hasn’t happen in Canada, and the pretentiousness of gated communities is ridiculed in Canada, as are the coercive elements of ghetto lifestyle. Generally, people who come to Canada have gotten and acquiesced to that aspect of the Canadian mindset up to now. With weird Trudeau – not clear if it will remain that way (what an idiot – an immigration policy contingent on heavy vetting, which has been the case in Canada for a very long while now, is absolutely necessary).
Now – the point with respect to the outlined quandary about the “let you and him fight” dynamic unattached white women tend towards unconsciously supporting, …… the win on that, Canadian-masculine-sentiment-wise, is – “fuck-off beatch, and anybody that wants to play that game can fuck-off too, and that is what is worth standing my ground on and fighting for, but I’m certainly not fighting for what you may or may not otherwise want in that respect”. The sentiment boils down to – confidence in one’s own ability around ‘may the best man win’, by the graces of merit, not tribalism, and fuck-off on anything else.
Now – some will say the jury is still out with respect to Canada on these matters (this leftoid brain-washing among the younger set is of course alive and well and particularly stinky in Canada too), and I don’t disagree, but nevertheless, from a universal western perspective, there is something to be said for the attitude – “fuck-off beatch, and anybody that wants to play that game can fuck-off too, and that is what is worth standing my ground on and fighting for, but I’m not fighting for what you may or may not otherwise want in that respect.” With regards to Trump’s civic nationalist stance – is this not his root sentiment as well? As well, anecdotally, I notice that leftoid white women have no issue whatsoever with this stance (probably because it is enforcing a certain confident dominant frame, but in a way that is palatable to them). Now – talk about ethnic quotas on immigration, as a necessary part of the discussion with respect to cultural dilution, especially given the differences in birth rates, demographically, and what that ultimately may mean to the mindset that upholds promoting valuations around merit instead of tribalism – well – leftoid white women get very emotional around that – and mostly refuse to engage on that tissue (denial), so ……. ultimately I could be wrong (as I guess is the message here at CH). But I think it is probably a question of how wrong and how right each position is – i.e. – there is a place for recognizing some potential for universal appreciation of certain ideological truths that underpin western culture, but on the other hand – probably harder for some ethnic groups to grok this – they need alot of cultural reinforcements, so as not to go off the rails towards more tribalism (but right now it seems we have been mostly providing anti-reinforcement around that – fucking Obama and the like).
My main point – the way forward may be an intra, and inter-masculine re-emphasis on the underpinnings of western ideals – western women are never gonna get some of this – but will appreciate the re-emphasis nevertheless, when and if it occurs.
From the long-term perspective, ultimately, what choice do we have anyways? It is best for everybody if we don’t have world wide conflagration. So …… what can we salvage with respect to the new realities? Western ideals man – that is what is ultimately of value in any event.
LikeLike
“Masculine freedom of movement” is a very interesting concept, and correlates well with the early history of the United States. One reason why government governed lightly in early America was because until about 1890, if you didn’t like your leaders you could literally vote with your feet and go west. Politicians who wanted to hold on to their tax base simply couldn’t afford to piss off too many people.
After the closing of the frontier, however (see F.J. Turner), and the ensuing scarcity of unincorporated land, government began to turn the screw. That was the beginning of the “Progressive” Era and the the twin calamities of direct taxation and female suffrage, which led directly to New Deal/Great Society socialism, and Hart-Cellar population replacement.
Canada still has lots of unincorporated land, and much of its climate is uncongenial to those from the global south.
Manifest Destiny, anyone?
LikeLike
All of that only works because Canada is larger than the United States but has the population of Belgium + Netherlands.
Because most of it is frozen solid most of the time and not fit for human habitation, that’s nature putting a very, very solid limit on freedom of movement.
No one moves anywhere when it’s 60 below with 50 mph winds.
Give it a while, you’ll have no-go zones in Torontobad, Al-Montcaliph and Vancovong soon enough.
LikeLike
wolfie65 – I meant the masculine freedom of movement, free from the tyranny of accepting disrespect by way of cowering, (which is akin to self-disrespect), in response to tribal territorial dominance hierarchies, within populated areas (Canadian cities), where the majority of the Canadian population resides (though I see your point about the vastness of the Canadian landscape, that both you and Tarl Cabot make, and about what that reality does to the Canadian psyche – and I for one believe that the way this informs the Canadian psyche truly is a blessing).
But so far we do not have the tyranny of disrespect by way of tribal territorial dominance hierarchies occurring in the Canadian cities. I believe this is because of the heavy vetting inherent in the Canadian immigration policy, but I agree may well also be because we have not reached certain saturations for certain demographics (African and middle eastern Sunnis for instance) that have occurred in Europe. Canada needs to be more careful, go-forward, around that. It is also worth noting the the immigration experience in some European countries seem to carry with it, the relic of colonialism (Algerians in France for instance), and the non-set-aside animosities (on both sides) in that respect (something that hasn’t occurred in Canada – Canada has never been a colonial power in it’s own right – but instead a formation as a colonial extension of Britain and France). So as I said …. I agree the jury is still out with respect to Canada.
But I don’t think that necessarily discounts my point that enforcing a confident dominant masculine frame around western ideals is a worthy go-forward strategy. Western women would then get what the yearn for – a dominant masculine frame + more choice among men (i.e. – limited diversity but of western mindset) who share said frame.
And as such, western men can get out of the demeaning game of this fucked-up modern form of chivalry (fucking virtue-signaling around which man, or type of man, satisfies the woman’s natural prerogative around female choice in these matters). The western man should be saying fuck-off to the female wish for this type of twisted chivalry. The confident dominant masculine western mindset around this?: There is only one type of such man that fits the bill – and that is a western man (ideology-wise).
Of course ultimately, women choose, but there should be consequence to said choices. Currently women are being blinded to those consequences. Telling women that I shall not be limited in my masculine freedom of movement, and shall not tolerate such …. is well accepted by even leftist leaning white women, on the face of it. But they seem not capable of figuring out what rationally follows from that (border protections), and they don’t really need to figure that out rationally, because instead they should feel it at the limbic level (because: womenz), which shall be delivered by way of the other part of said masculine message …… that I will not fight for you per se, western woman, but only for my masculine right of freedom of movement (which benefit women do not really enjoy to anywhere near the same degree, so they simply acquiesce to the dominant masculine ordering in this respect), the message therefore delivered to the woman’s hindbrain is …… “western women …. you are not special ….. the limited diversity brings other worthy women as well (two-way-street-wise)”. Now it is contingent upon immigration policy that this in fact is delivered (I don’t really see how the African Sunni and middle eastern Sunni demographics deliver on this – and that is a problem nobody want to talk about).
As weird as this all seems, enforcing a confident dominant masculine frame around western ideals is precisely the dynamic that will keep white people breeding with white people (which isn’t happening enough even among white co-habitators, partly because of the current dynamic of selfishness among western women). Enforcing a confident dominant masculine frame around western ideals would actually be akin to calling western women on their giant shit test.
LikeLike
Meh, pols!! Most of them are bs sponsored by someone that wants to promote some agenda.
But….if this pol is somewhat accurate, even more reason for that Wall to be built.
Gotta have something tangible to help destroy the (((narratives))) poisoning the American consciousness.
The building of the wall IS the key issue for Donald Trump’s presidency. I hope he does it.
LikeLike
BS. Fake news and fake stats. Just like HItlary had 99% chance to win. The aim is just to instill the differences between White men and women ,since the Heritage America flashed a middle finger to the marxist electorate.
LikeLike
Black congresswoman full of corruption: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/corrine-brown-former-florida-congresswoman-found-guilty-sham-charity/
LikeLike
Here’s a bit of optimism for everyone, or at least a “light at the end of the tunnel”
First, there’s more white people alive now than at any point in history. While I do worry about a massive war paring those numbers down, there are a lot of whites out there.
Vast populations of nonwhites depend on white technology and work to survive, arguably even China and India.
The pie in first world countries is shrinking. That will erode some of the feminism and other degeneracy, I believe.
Right now, theres a selction process happening for people who reject modernity. The low birthrates will find a floor eventually.
LikeLike
That’s what I’ve been hoping & praying for, for more than a decade now: That there is an immutable kernel of fert!lity buried deep in Our Race, which will survive the Frankfurt School Poisoning, and eventually begin re-asserting itself, and finally burst forth more powerful than ever before.
Mathematically, it feels like a sound idea, but realistically, I don’t yet know whether it’s a pipedream.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The part that worries me most is that in many, if not all, European countries, Whites are already a minority in the under-30 age groups.
Thanks, Boomers.
LikeLike
The college years, which was not always the rite of passage it now is, only prolongs adolescence. College kids tend to have relatively little real-world experience, only what’s in their artificial little university bubbles. (This goes double for girls and anyone with a “work” study job.)
Up the voting age to 21; with today’s increased life expectancy I’d say 25, but 21 evens out for the folks who skipped college, and was the historical age of suffrage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Many of us have already surmised that if the majority of illegal and legal immigrants, as well as so-called ‘refugees’, were young, single (and thin) women (especially light browns and Asians), then single White women (whose SMV would drop precipitously – especially any woman who is a 6 or below) would be opposed to immigration in all forms by a 4-1 margin. It would be higher except for the fact that the many vocal lesbians would still be in favor of it. I would love to see old liberal baby-boomer men leave their old, fat, short-haired liberal wives for a nice young Asian girl.
LikeLike
They would be manning (…) the borders, shoulder to shoulder, @rm3d to the teeth and mercilessly @nn1h1late any Asian, African or Latin g1rl who dares come closer.
LikeLike
For more info on this topic – my article here:
http://diversitymachtfrei.blogspot.bg/2016/05/the-problem-with-feminism-why.html
LikeLike
How do I get my boyfriend to read this website? Now that’s a question you’re not used to getting.
LikeLike
Maybe you can tell him that he has a duty towards his people, woman, and future kids, to become a red pilled white patriot. This site could help him to become more red pilled.
LikeLike
Maybe you need a new boyfriend, who can supply you with some Peak Alpha Sh!tlord seed.
What part of the country are you in?
LikeLike
Assuming you’re a girl (girls love cutesily narcissistic “me/meee!/itsme” handles), it’s easy. Forward him any CH article on male/female relations and just write “LOL”. He will read it trying to figure out why you LOL’d, but he’ll still have read it. And if he has any brains or balls at all, he’ll keep reading.
LikeLike
I think that the reason is simpler. women have a big heart and want to save the world. they apply their nurturing instincts to political situations. their biology is familiar with forcing the older children to help the younger children and they apply this logic to “white men”
LikeLike
I issue a great big fart at your comment
LikeLike
I welcome further suggestions from the commentariat.
———————————————————–
they need to rebuild the family as an economic unit. Maybe exempt everyone making less than 500k from paying income tax to allow family businesses.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reason 972: to have enough nannies and housekeepers in the wings to have cheap childcare whilst maintaining gogirrll careers.
LikeLike
when you are a worthless “beign” but they still let you walk around and pollute
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C_SZMSRVoAAhx8e.jpg:large
LikeLike
LikeLike
I’m not sure when the Texas legislature actually passed that bill and presented it to the Governor for his signature, but I would have waited until May 5th to sign it into law. Cinco de Bye Bye.
LikeLike
Someone really needs to mess with these asshats by creating big signs that read, “No Alien is Human”.
LikeLike
We’ve only just beugn.
LikeLike
#5 “Make divorce harder for women.”
You will never pry no fault divorce from their cold, dead souls but a few reasonable changes that will profoundly curb divorce are: (1) true equal 50-50 custody as a presumption; (2) No child support — each parent funds their own life with the kids; and (3) No alimony without proving fault.
This will immediately remove the largest economic incentive for women to divorce.
LikeLike
I’d shutdown faceberg and instawhoré. That’d go a long way.
LikeLike
A love latter to ADL
I labeled that speech three years ago “a love letter to the ADL.” Three years later I can say, from the perspective of the FBI: we are still in love with you.
————————————————————————————————–
Subhuman levels of spinelessness that should not even exist
LikeLike
9. No man may be held liable for the maintenance of any child for which his paternity has not been conclusively established by DNA evidence.
LikeLike
We have to start impeding and, where possible, reversing this seemingly inexorable flow of resources from men to single/divorced women that (((they))) have been promoting for the last 60 years.
Things that can’t continue won’t. The go grrl gravy train is one of those things.
LikeLike
“Thus, they are in their stage of life when all faculties, mental, emotional, libidinal, are focused to a pinpoint of estrogenic vitality”
yeah, those legions of 40+ divorced white chicks and their “estrogenic vitality”…oh, wait, you mean most single women aren’t 20-30 y.o.?
LikeLike
Let’s look at voter participation statistics for single women:
30 and under: 32.7%
30-59: 24.7%
60+: 42.7%
found this at voterparticipation dot org
LikeLike
LikeLike
Consider the story of Sammy Jankis to understand White Women’s motives for open borders.
LikeLike
My comment disappeared.
LikeLike