Feed on
Posts
Comments

Porn for women is an overlooked phenomenon, partly because the type of porn that stimulates women isn’t as visually arresting as the porn that consumes men. The pink and moist pyrotechnics we associate with the online porn that readily captures male attention does little for women (though recent data suggest more women are turning to online porn for sexual relief, the numbers are still low, under 20%).

Female porn utilizes a different medium of arousal delivery, but the effect on the female libido and ability to form healthy relationships is just as profound as that of online porn’s effect on men.

So what is female porn? It’s pulp romance — in the form of books, movies and TV — that caresses lady limbic lobes to sprout slick clit dick. In a word: words.

More wokely, a lot of that female porn is rape fantasy porn.

The premise: women are different than men, in the most fundamental ways imaginable. Evolution as old as time has resulted in a sexually reproducing species that has inherited sexual, mental and psychological traits differentiating the sexes.

If you can’t accept this premise (self-delusion is a widespread affliction in post-America), then you won’t understand how it is words can have the same power over women’s horny levels that graphic crotch-slapping close-ups have on men’s horny levels. Nevertheless, it’s true. Women are turned on when they read salacious stories that allow their hindminds to fill in the sticky details.

There are hundreds of thousands of self-published ebook authors, but according to Amazon, only 40 of these have managed to make a profit by selling over 1 million copies of their ebooks over the last five years. Ms. Wild happens to be one of them. What is her secret? […]

So let’s look at what Ms. Wild writes about in her novels. Her first novel, Hardwired, is about a young woman’s encounters with “an array of sexual kinks.” Her subsequent novels are along the same vein. At the end of the article, a writer for Ms. Wild’s new publishing house says she is happy to “focus on writing sex scenes” because: “I just want to write wicked hot books.”

And here the light begins to flicker onto the truth. Under the euphemism of “romance,” Ms. Wild peddles erotica, the literary equivalent of pornography. While her books are not filled with nude photographs or graphic video, they contain the same drug reconstituted into another form: words that translate into pornographic images which burn into the minds of their readers (to see for yourself, excerpts of her novels are available on her website).

Ms. Wild, it turns out, is the female equivalent of Hugh Hefner. She is a verbal drug pusher, shoving words as potent as cocaine at her own gender.

And droves of women are clearly addicted. In an industry that is insanely competitive, where most authors earn below the poverty line, Ms. Wild’s first novel, published in 2014, was making $500,000 in royalties per month soon after its release. Ms. Wild sold a total of 1.4 million copies of this book and agreed to a $6.25 million advance for five books. She also started a new publishing house, which has already sold more than a million copies and hit the New York Times Bestseller list with one of its first titles, Calendar Girl.

The bottom line on the numbers of female porn consumers:

But according to Laurie Kahn, producer of the documentary film Love Between the Covers: “More than 70 million people in the USA alone read at least one romance novel per year, and most of them read many more.”

The US Census for 2015 shows there are 100 million women between 18 and 64 years old living in the United States. If Kahn’s number is correct, and assuming that the majority of those “70 million people” are women, then up to 70 percent of American women are covertly consuming literary pornography.

Pleasureman wept.

Does any of this matter? Parents want to shield their kids from visual porn, but they don’t feel nearly the same protective affront when a woman is reading a pulp romance novel in public.

You are sitting on a bus during your morning commute. In the seat next to you, there is a male passenger reading Penthouse. Chances are you may feel upset, perhaps disgusted. You might even demand that he stop.

On the other side, there is a female passenger holding a book with a very plain cover, entitled Into the Fire. With a mysterious title like that, this book could be about anything. If you ask, the passenger will tell you that it is a “romance” novel by Meredith Wild. The passenger has always loved these kinds of books, she tells you, ever since she read Jane Austen as a teenager. Innocent fairy tale, you conclude.

Both passengers are consuming pornography. But the woman is doing it so discreetly that almost no one recognizes it—often, not even the statistics.

Here’s the thing: the woman reading Into the Fire on the bus is popping a public lady boner just as assuredly as a man scouring Pornclearinghouse on his iPhag is jutting impudently into the public space. From five feet away, typeset is harder to discern than a streaming PIV video; that’s the only difference between the porn-consuming man and woman and the social norms they are violating.

Among those who admit that romance literature is pornography, there is a tendency to consider it “soft-core” (some also downplay it as “mommy porn“). This implies that it is less potent and less dangerous than the “hard” visual stuff that fries the brains of men.

When viewed from a male perspective, it makes sense to classify “pornmance” as “soft” pornography. Men are more visual than women, so they respond more strongly to photographs and video. To men, images are like crack cocaine, and literary pornography is mere marijuana.

But for women, the opposite is true. Women are less visual, and so less attracted to the internet pornography that is irresistible to men. For women, visual pornography should be considered a light beer while the emotionally charged “pornmance” novel is 70-proof liquor, hard-core pornography.

100% truefact. This is something that tradcons don’t get.

And there are many “romance alcoholics.” Women get addicted to romance books in the same way that men get addicted to photographs and videos. In 2011, one psychologist reported that she was “seeing more and more women who are clinically addicted to romantic books.”

Time for a NO DIDDLE movement.

Like other addictions, “pornmance” novels mess with women’s brains and wreak havoc in their lives. According to therapists, these books can cause women to become dissatisfied with their marriages, to become “dangerously unbalanced,” and according to a pornography addiction counselor, to have affairs.

A smarmy white knight would never finger a cause for the high divorce rate that didn’t apportion blame entirely on men. In the pussy pedestaler’s worldview, only drunk, abusive, layabout men end marriages. To them, women aren’t capable of crass sexual escapism driven by primal insatiable lusts.

Is it mere coincidence that nearly 70 percent of divorces in the United States are initiated by women?

The authoress of this article, Lea Singh, must be a CH reader. Little spoon?

If online porn is a problem for society, then so is word porn. If you argue that online porn is causing men to “drop out” and deep-six their marriages and relationships, then you have to also argue that word porn is causing women to do the same.

I’ve said it before to obstinate tradcons and their ironic bedfellows, the man-hating feminist cunts:

It takes two to tango. Especially if that tango two-steps to the metagrave.

161 Responses to “The Crisis Of Female Porn Addiction (it’s worse than you think)”

  1. itsme says:

    i miss the good ole days when women were illiterate.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Squibby says:

      The sedentary reading is surely gunna make them even chubbier. I miss the good ole day’s when they all snorted coke, stayed thin, and their domiciles were always clean.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Ironpusher says:

      Ha ha! Nice one.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Johnny Redux says:

      It is sort of funny…you give them a $100,000 education and they use it to read cheap smut books. I’ve yet to see a woman reading a classic (written by a man…not the Jane Austin stories), or reading a magazine that involves thought or skill (Popular Science, Popular Mechanics, etc.). And they wonder why there are so few women in STEM studies.

      Liked by 3 people

      • A few years ago I read an article in which they were saying that Amazon’s numbers on who buys what, revealed that most women read fiction like romance novels and they almost exclusively read books either about women or written by women.

        while men read a bit of everything from novels to science to how to books and they do not read books only written by men nor that talk about men.

        Women ( well most of them ) have almost no scientific curiosity, they just want to feel , but not understand or learn and are very “woman centric”

        Liked by 1 person

      • cortesar says:

        I made a mistake once by compelling a cunt to read one of my favorite books
        Poor thing was so confused did not understand a single thing
        And she had a STEM master degree, she was rather nice and good looking yet trivial and banal as the rest
        She was reading 50 shades next time I saw her
        I told her that I would like to discuss that masterpiece with her too but at the more appropriate place
        She blushed
        I will do that with my boyfriend she said
        I am sure your boyfriend does not have the intellectual depth to grasp all nuances and complexity of the book
        She walked away faking the anger
        Call me I said if you need help with metaphors

        Like

      • “I made a mistake once by compelling a cunt to read one of my favorite books
        Poor thing was so confused did not understand a single thing.”

        Here’s a line I read once in a “Teacher’s Journal” from probably 2007-08 which I believe I can recite almost word for word, so delectable was its stupidity:

        “. . . but I still prefer ‘Twilight’ by Stephanie Meyer to ‘Wuthering Heights’ by Emily Bronte.”

        Now, Twilight was only a few years old then, and this chick already had her own English classroom, so she couldn’t have been some tweenybopper when she first read it. So presumably she was forced to read (“read”!) Wuthering Heights in college, while likely first reading Twilight as an actual college student (or, at a stretch, a hs senior) but she STILL “prefers” Twilight, a book for impressionable thirteen year-olds at best.

        And the supercilious diction is what gets me: “but”– as if there is some grey mass of critical merit in her brain which has weighed the respective merits of the two works and found Bronte wanting; “I still prefer”– as if, despite all the maturity of worldly adulthood, she can and should solemnly aver her preference for twaddle over a serious canonical work; and then the ludicrous “by [full author]” locutions as if a) Stephanie Meyer were worthy of the salute and b) Emily Bronte needed an introduction.

        And yes: Wuthering Heights is a terrific Byronic tone poem of a novel: immensely intricate, metaphysically challenging, a grim “King Lear”-like weighing of Christian charity against Hobbesian cruelty (sexual and otherwise); and, at its heart, it has in Catherine Earnshaw (the elder) a heroine as viciously amoral, and even more implacable, than the infamous Heathcliff.

        [CH: i enjoyed this comment by lucius somesuch.]

        Liked by 1 person

      • picowhi says:

        Shit, that’s why there are so many that Major in English.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        That WAS a good comment by Lucious, indeed.

        /yet another tip o’ the cap rape!

        Like

      • PA says:

        I enjoy every comment by L.S.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        Before taking the red pill, I went back to finish my degree (more so to get that monkey off my back–it always nagged at me) and got my degree in yup, English…cr8tive righting, no less!

        Long story short as to why, naturally, it was full o’girls and yup, it was when Twilight and the like had hit their stride in full force. Some of the short stories I’d write would get quite the critique from some of the females.

        One in particular, who had studied abroad, took delight in one story. She was a nice, leggy, lithe babe, but no doubt had tasted numerous foreign cock.

        Had I known then what I know now, it would have made for some fun times, but, then I would have majored in something else.

        C’est la vie!

        Like

      • Colonel Hogan says:

        @Johnny Redux
        I hear what yer sayin’, but any science publication with the word ‘popular’ in the title really isn’t worth reading these days. I used to enjoy those magazines, but the quality has certainly dropped off over the past 10 years. Just warning those who haven’t read them in a while to not expect any insightful articles.

        Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      To some degree, they still are illiterate.
      I’ve actually read the first parts of 50 Shades and The Vampire Diaries – I’m ashamed to admit I even wasted my time with The Hunger Games – and looked at various ‘Romance’ novels over the years, and they’re all inane, low-grade drivel that might get a D in Middle School, if the teach is feeling generous.
      How anyone over 13 can actually enjoy this is beyond me.
      The good news is that I’ve hardly ever seen any *attractive* women in bookstores (or libraries, for that matter), 6’s or lower is what you tend to find there, so as far as I can tell, 7 +’s don’t read.
      Well, maybe Cosmo…….

      Like

    • King says:

      Written pornography isn’t anything near as damaging as hardcore hi-def visual smut. Words may be more involving, but they don’t actively rewire neural pathways the way a steady diet of images do. (See Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman and Your Brain on Porn by Gary Wilson.)

      “[J]ust as profound as that of online porn” is a lame and unnecessary tu quoque that downplays the truly dire effect our ubiquitous porn culture has on men. The essential fact here is: men are voyeurs, women are exhibitionists. The sexes are both degraded — but one by consuming, the other by producing.

      Reading offers the minimal virtue of active participation, while voyeurism is almost completely passive. So in addition to exciting one’s deviancy like written erotica, visual porn is enervating and emasculating.

      The etymology of pornography is a euphemism compared to the soul-destroying superabundance of images known by the name today. Porneion means “brothel” and “graphein” means “to write.” The letters of whores. How quaint.

      Matt

      Like

      • mendo says:

        Good to see you back, Matt.

        Like

      • Randy the Random says:

        That sounds an awful lot like Pussy Pedestalization to me Matt.

        It is equally as bad. Reading grade 5 level smut is no more engaging than watching Pirates The Movie.

        Quit excusing these hoes for their sins. No more pussy pass.

        Like

      • JF says:

        What, did Neil Postman write another Bible or something? This wouldn’t be the first thing Postman got wrong in that book. He had it wrong about Orwell vs. Huxley, too.
        You sound eerily like a tradcon. What in the world are you doing here?
        Let me guess: Even when women commit the sin of reading their word-porn, it’s only because of some neglect or abuse that their husband has been perpetrating on them, and if only their husbands would slaughter themselves more, pedestalize them more, become more of a mule and a human wallet for them, then these deadbeats would finally, maybe, be worthy of being loved and respected by their wives.
        Where have I heard this before? Oh yeah—everywhere and anywhere in our culture except for rare sites like this.

        Like

  2. […] The Crisis Of Female Porn Addiction (it’s worse than you think) […]

    Like

  3. rugby11 says:

    Interesting read

    Like

  4. jeangray07 says:

    It starts with Disney (handsome princes to the rescue). Then Austen (handsome, rich). Then the Twilight style books (handsome, rich, bad boy with a case of oneitis). Then the 50 Shades garbage (handsome, rich, bad boy with a case of oneitis, freaky in bed but not so freaky that you feel gross about it). It just goes darker and deeper from there. Pardon the pun.

    You can almost understand why women weren’t allowed to read anything without her man’s permission.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Nah says:

    I haven’t read a romance novel in so long. When I would finish reading them, I realized like the women in porn I look nothing like the female protagonist. I’ve read s few where the girl was supposed to be ‘average’ but on fiction average still means drop dead gorgeous. I’ve been trying to get back into them but I get that overwhelm sense of sadness/guilt so I just put it back. I will say when I did read them, I had no interest in dating. I was numb to it. I got high basically off reading the book. That’s one thing I miss.

    Like

  6. “If online porn is a problem for society…”

    It’s not. Nothing to see here, move along now.

    Like

  7. plumpjack says:

    if pulp romance is female porn, then which types of men are the metaphorical ‘sex workers’ for the female market?? is it the non-threatening, smooth-talking, feels-soliciting, lothario who’s “in touch with his feminine side”? badboy alphas generally aren’t known for their libido-stimulating verbal eloquence….

    what’s the takeaway here…?

    Like

    • Guys with good game maybe?

      Game is knowing what to say, coming up with the right words at the right time

      words are porn to women

      Like

    • cynthia says:

      Have you ever watched the Outlander series? The Jamie character is pretty much the model guy.

      Like

      • Outlander is nothing but a TV series romance novel (no surprise since the books it’s based on are romance novels). It follows every trope; Jamie is a dashing rogue on the run with a price on his head who also (surprise!) is a lord. Meanwhile every man wants Claire, even the gay guy wants her. It reminds me of True Blood, where the main character Sookie, is dumb as post and has at best average looks, but everyone wants her. I mean a 1000 year old vampire gets oneitis over her?

        There sure are a look of clues to female psychology in what the write, read, and watch.

        Like

      • cynthia says:

        @Mike

        I’ve said it before around here and I’ll say it again; het erotica (guy-on-girl) is all about feminist fantasy beta males and Mary Sues, but if you want an honest portrayal of female sexual desire, you have to dig into slash (guy-on-guy). Both are informative, and both are damaging. Women that read too much het get completely unrealistic expectations of men, and can’t deal with men as they are. Women that read too much slash usually end up with some kind of sexual dysfunction.

        No woman in real life could be turned on by a guy like Jamie. I got about halfway through season one and had to turn it off. Romance novels set you up for massive relationship failure later on.

        Like

  8. A related issue is the popularity of the Urban Fantasy / Paranormal Romance genre. Basically, they are romance novels where the alpha’s and badboys are Vampires, or Werewolves, or some other supernatural being.

    A simple Alpha male no longer gets the gash gushing. Now they are escalating to more powerful and more dark triad characters that have supernatural powers. I’m sure that has no impact on their expectations and their ability to remain attracted to your average beta chump.

    Like

    • Tarl Cabot says:

      This is simply the modern version of the classical myth of being seduced/raped by a god. Instead of Zeus or Apollo, you have Edward or Christian (billionaires are simply more prosaic gods, in the female imagination).

      The truth behind the myth is that women want to worship their men, but it’s up to men to be worthy of worship. Our current culture makes this increasingly difficult. As demonstrable masculinity is increasingly socially unacceptable, at least for white men, women increasingly retreat to idealized, and idolized, fantasies.

      Also pretend lesbianism, but that’s another topic…

      Like

  9. Ironpusher says:

    I’m sure (((strapon))) will be by shortly to share her favorite novels.

    Liked by 1 person

    • whorefinder says:

      If Scandal has proven anything, it’s that the old black female fantasy of becoming a House Negro and becoming the mistress of the Big White Massa in the Plantation House remains ever-prevalent among black females.

      Projection rape!

      Like

      • Ironpusher says:

        Indeed it does. In my younger days I discovered by accident that “relatively” attractive females of the species Africanis negropolis were waaaaay easier to pick up than white girls. I’d like to think that the were starving for my superior white D but, maybe they were just sluts……

        Don’t judge a horny college student rape!!!!

        Liked by 1 person

      • whorefinder says:

        I judge, but I’m caring about it.

        Stay off the welfare moms rape!

        Like

    • Vincent says:

      Talk about fiction…

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      BWWM Secret Pregnancy Interracial Romance, eh?

      That pregnancy doesn’t look so secret to me.

      Negress meant secret paternity… but there again, there’s yer race is merely a social construction, but check out these ah-may-zing black genetics stereotype myth gambit.

      Like

  10. CEO Nikolic says:

    While looking up images online for my website, I came across the ultimate chick romance book:

    THE BILLIONAIRE BIKER.

    Not only is he suave enough to amass money, smart enough to hold it, and stable enough to prove you, the lady, with the luxe life you think you deserive, he’s a tough, rambunctious, wild BIKER whose Harley is gripped in hands of steel as he rides the night.

    (My purple prose.)

    I haven’t read it, but I can imagine the scenes:

    (page 52):

    Vince McReady III sat on his hog, caressing Betty’s thigh with one callused hand. In his other hand was a copy of IBM’s third-quarter financial results. But he was a man of decision. He knew what he wanted. The time for IBM had come and gone. It was now the time for passion.

    (page 71):

    Vince, engrossed with the Heartiste website on his screen, eyes dilating at the image of cucks being cucked by their young lasses, felt a strange hand on his inner thigh. It was Betty, trying to cajole him from his Internet addiction. The moment, which had felt so right and was enlightening about the inferior gender, became weird as Betty took him in her hands and kneaded him to his eleven-inch rebel’s length. In moments he was ride to ride. Biker-style.

    (page 194):

    As Betty cried on the bed, Vince knelt gently beside her. “It’s okay,” he murmured, “the cuts on your knees will heal pretty fricken soon.”

    “It’s not that!” she cried. “I didn’t get these from falling off your hog! It was from fellating you on a rough cabin floor without carpeting!”

    And so on.

    *CEO Nikolic bows*

    Like

  11. Gaston_D says:

    They also get aroused by the sight of primates coupling.

    Why’d you forget to link to this?

    Like

  12. English Dude says:

    Indeed, and we’d need a study on this, but my theory is that for men, consuming porn to ejaculation would lead to him then feeling satisfied, tired, and less likely to find another woman to bang, and instead go cuddle his missus.

    Whereas for a woman reading these steamy books and having a “diddle”, right up to orgasm, she wouldn’t exactly be satisfied, and instead start to seek other men who could actually give it to her. Rich, attractive, kinky, dark / handsome, TALL, suave, blabablablalal men…

    A man may realise not every woman is a bloody supermodel, and after cumming, also realise he cba with all the baggage that can come with such women (especially emotional). Whereas women get often sidetracked and just add more shit to their list of demands for the “perfect” bloke, to get what they’re apparently missing out on.

    Again we’d need a study, but I think the aftereffects for both sexes would be VERY different, especially for those already in relationships.

    Like

  13. Chris Stevenson says:

    Another venue for women’s porn addiction are the various Law & Order SVU, Criminal Minds and NCIS type shows. All of them to one degree or another deal with the kind of rape and violence and even deviant imagery that appeal to women’s potential for degeneracy. Mark Harmon’s genius has made his NCIS show the most popular. He knows the formula very well with the mentality of a drug dealer.

    Women are actually the more visual creature. Window shopping and the nuances of fashion and decorating, etc. They assess men visually to a degree that is almost creepy when you think about it. When they have sex they want to close their eyes even desiring a darkened room as they can turn off this dominant sense and release. Men are mistakenly called more visual as we assess attraction by physical characteristic, however there is a strong intellectual and emotional aspect to our desires. We think about things a lot more and are aroused by them this way. When men view porn they are aroused by images, but they also follow the act. I have listened to men talk about porn and there is a lot of narration about the story. In fact some of the most appealing pornography for men has themes that men can mentally participate in. Women are looking to project their already hardwired fantasies on a scene. It doesn’t necessarily validate them, but rather release some sort of energy or craving that is deep down without an avenue or Alpha to manifest it in reality. Since the porn for women is not real, it leaves them wanting and this only elevates the degeneracy as a thirsty person can drink a river.

    The takeaway is that women need a form of dominance, or leadership, that allows them to submit, be fulfilled and not spiral into degeneracy. Many times I have set boundaries for women in terms of what I will not do and that they should not. It is almost as if the man must be a limiting factor to protect them from themselves. It starts with giving them what they need in a strong culture.

    A lot of sluts get involved in the degenerate acts with players as the lifestyle never gives them what they really need which is not commitment but the dominance of one man. Once they start that hunger or thirst it is as if they are ruined for life.

    Like

  14. Lazy Hero says:

    Circa 2000, I’m in an acting class in LA. We do the attempted rape scene in Extremities, my scene partner looked like Tera Patrick. We both really go for it. She was nervous in rehearsals, but I have to give her credit, she had acting chops. After the scene we faced the audience of 80 or so to get our critique. I’ve never had so many women look at me like the wanted to fuck me before. Some of them were still crying. An acting class in LA is full of attractive people, I was not one of the more attractive men by the class standards, and I’m not sure how talented I was, but I went for it in the scene. I had girls who never spoke to me want to talk after class, “I never thought of you that way before.”

    Make of this what you will…

    Liked by 1 person

    • Not really comparable, but I played the Devil in “The Devil and Daniel Webster” when I was 16 with a full-on Jack Nicholson in “The Witches of Eastwick” impression. This was for festival competition on daytrips so I didn’t really get to bask in anonymous adulation hands-on, but I remember a time some months later when a 40-something schoolteacher from another school confronted me and gushed at me, wide-eyed, “Every time I see you, I just wanna make the sign of the cross!!!”

      Like

    • hans says:

      Like actually attracts alike.
      Make of it what you will.

      Evil bitches rape rape

      Like

    • whorefinder says:

      what do I make of it?

      whorefinder is always right rape!

      Like

  15. Lichthof says:

    My Secret Garden
    50 Shades
    9.5 Weeks
    The Night Porter
    Emmanuelle

    All written by women

    Liked by 1 person

    • (don’t forget The Story of O)

      Like

      • cortesar says:

        Story of O is a tale of female submission involving a beautiful Parisian fashion photographer named O, who is taught to be constantly available for oral, vaginal, and anal intercourse, offering herself to any male who belongs to the same secret society as her lover. She is regularly stripped, blindfolded, chained and whipped; her anus is widened by increasingly large plugs; her labium is pierced and her buttocks are branded.
        —————————————————————————-

        The author Anne Desclos

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        Which one is this out of 6?

        Like

    • mmaier2112 says:

      My Secret Garden only shows how totally fucked up women are and the depths of depravity into which they will dive when not getting a good fucking dicking.

      Seriously, do not read that book. It will only deepen your disgust with the female sex. It’s truly depressing and that was after fully swallowing the Red Pill.

      There is nothing this world can show me now that will lessen my opinion of females.

      Like

      • oink says:

        There is nothing this world can show me now that will lessen my opinion of females.

        that is a bold statement

        Like

      • Lichthof says:

        The Night Porter is about a concentration camp prisoner who submits to a Nazi guard …pure Stockholm Syndrome.
        They accidentally meet up again after the war in Vienna. He is a hotel porter..she is a guest. She calls room service…excellent movie. Dirk Bogarde.

        Like

    • invaderace says:

      The sexual life of Catherine M. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sexual_Life_of_Catherine_M.)

      Like

    • Amasius says:

      “Gone With the Wind” was written by a chick too, though. NAWALT *trollface*.

      Like

  16. Dali's Clock says:

    “Time for a NO DIDDLE movement.”

    That would be a good idea. Women love movements (community and all that), so the few women who realize the negative impacts of erotica on their lives would have some kind of support as well as the risk of being shamed for failure. As small as the no-fap movement is, though, I can’t imagine the number female adherents reaching even the same percentage; too many women believe their preferred get-off material isn’t harmful, and it’s still more or less socially acceptable.

    As a side note, I hear that the direct female equivalent of “fap” is “schlick,” to keep the onomatopoeia thing going.

    Like

  17. Doktor Jeep says:

    Does not feel like there is anything new here. Women have always been reading romance novels and running their finger in their crotch over it.

    Think back… the movie “Misery” took the concept of the kind of woman who reads these novels to the extreme. It’s been in the public conscious for a long time.

    And of course the post modern work, 50 Shades of Gay.

    I wonder though, would reading some of these books allow a fellow to learn a little deep psych game and tap into the desires of this literature-fed raving hornbeast that women keep carefully chained up? Makes me think.

    Like

    • carlos danger says:

      Sisters of Mercy

      Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      No ‘deep psych’ required.
      The guys are always very tall, deliriously handsome multibillionaires, princes or similar with chiseled bodies, oodles and gaboodles of cash, cars & cribs and fall hopelessly, uncontrollably for a mousy brunette klutz, whom they ravish aggressively 17 times a day in their private jet on the way to Paris or the Seychelles.

      Liked by 1 person

  18. “Is it mere coincidence that nearly 70 percent of divorces in the United States are initiated by women?”

    Like

    • Well, could it be because men are more likely to act badly, therefore women are more likely to react to such transgression by demanding a divorce?

      Like

      • Ironpusher says:

        Not hardly. Though she most likely has less to lose. Such as her children and don’t forget about that $child support$.

        Like

      • Most women ask for divorce because they get money out of the deal.

        Why would men ask for divorce when it means losing a lot of money?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Well, could it be because men are more likely to act badly, therefore women are more likely to react to such transgression by demanding a divorce?

        Yeah… that’s it. :duckface:

        Like

      • Scanman says:

        Economics 101: behavior that is subsidized will increase.

        There is an economic incentive for women to divorce and an even larger economic incentive for women with children to divorce.

        “Men are more likely to act badly.” For your sake, I hope you’re 20 or younger. Otherwise, you’re just a stupid twat.

        Like

      • Chris says:

        If you’d said this a few generations ago, I might’ve been inclined to agree. But with the 3WF (Third-Wave Feminism) virus reaching pandemic proportions, women are encouraged to be as (insert Toxic Masculinity adjective here) as men and there’s enough blame to go around. It’s just that divorce courts and pretty much every other judicial branch is more likely to excuse women for it.

        Like

    • carlos danger says:

      That is a remarkably consistent figure. When divorce was legalized in France after the revolution, 70% of them were initiated by women.

      Like

  19. Ripp says:

    another female hypergamy driver.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. whorefinder says:

    Absolutely true. And people have noted this for a long time. I was even going to write a post about this, well done beating me to it, Dark Lords!

    I would add that Netflix/Lifetime/Law & Order: SVU-ing of TV has made it all the worse. Not only can she read it, she can watch it streaming, in huge “binge watching” chunks till bed on weeknights and all on the weekends while recovering from her hangover and one-night stand. Eight to ten hours of pure nonsensical fantasy. What an impact on her psyche!

    In Victorian Times, one of the signs of a woman with mental/emotional problems was if she read novels—especially “French” novels. Occasionally, you’ll see feminist websites today pass around and laugh about lists of the “signs” of “female hysteria” from that time—-which included novel-reading, obstinacy in obeying their father, and desire to wear pants.

    Looking back, however, from a 21st century red pill point of view, it’s clear those “signs” were spot on. A quarrelsome woman knee-deep in exotic fantasies via market-fiction, wanting to wear non-feminine or non-wholesome clothing, and rejecting her father’s authority—what are those except signs of a broken woman today, who will be riddled with tattoos, piercings, one-night-stands, and tagged with a future as a miserable single mom?

    Some 19th Century serious novelists were up on this. In Anthony Trollope’s The Eustace Diamonds, one of the ways he signals that the main female character is of low moral quality is that on Sundays, instead of going to church, she stays in bed all day reading novels. This leads her to her having a very bizarre book-inspired fantasies that she gradually thinks will become real—that a “corsair” (i.e a pirate) will come, kidnap her, and take her away to exotic lands and become her lover. That main character’s solipsism is positively Becky Sharpe-esque.

    Also, as to Jane Austen—Austen was actually partially mocking the romance-genre of her time, as she herself was quite conservative on social issues; for example, she was critical of the young British prince of her time being foppish and unserious and a party-boy.

    Austen’s mocking/parody tone was much in the same vein that Don Quixote was originally a mocking of the chivalric romances of Cervantes’s time. Austen’s novels had a satire in them that hasn’t come down—having her be a representative of romance today is a little bit like having Mel Brooks’s History of the World, Part I become known in about 150 years as a work of serious historical fiction.

    Classic literature rape!

    Like

    • You guys who don’t think women’s orgasms are important are missing the fact that it apparently causes hysteria and BP disorder. A sexually satisfied woman will operate on an even emotional plane all day, every day. I have done this now so many times its almost a science. They will put up with all your bullshit and follow you around like a dog.

      Like

      • whorefinder says:

        again, moderation rape!

        Like

      • 88 says:

        yep, and in my experience, that calm happy demeanor lasts a good 3 or 4 days after getting her off good.

        no one is saying men should focus all of their attention on the girl’s needs without regard for their own. that’s ridiculous.

        but making her come a couple or a few times a week makes for a much happier, more peaceful life.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Pwn says:

      So because the feminists scoff at 19th century idiocy, it must be true. Lol

      Like

      • whorefinder says:

        No, 19th Century views on women weren’t idiocy at all. They were red pill truths combined with long term care of society in mind.

        You’re a moron rape!

        Like

  21. whorefinder says:

    Get me out of moderation rape!

    Like

  22. […] effects of “female pornography” today, and how destructive it is on female behavior. Go read it here, and then come back for my comment on it below (which I also left […]

    Like

  23. cortesar says:

    Looking at the circus unfolding in front my eyes I cannot but remember the great man and his prophetic words

    When a candidate for public office faces the voters he does not face men of sense; he faces a mob of men whose chief distinguishing mark is the fact that they are quite incapable of weighing ideas, or even of comprehending any save the most elemental — men whose whole thinking is done in terms of emotion, and whose dominant emotion is dread of what they cannot understand. So confronted, the candidate must either bark with the pack or be lost… All the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre — the man who can most adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum. The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.

    HL Mencken

    Not once but twice

    Like

    • Publius says:

      W is really stupid motherfucker. Very, very stupid. I don’t believe the liars who say he actually has a high IQ. He is to blame for millions of whites voting for Obama. It was part of the NWO’s plan. We all know this now.

      Like

      • cortesar says:

        What Mencken said was so on the spot
        Remember “which candidate you would like to he have beer with” thing
        As for W IQ I heard he was tested 140 I do not know in which units
        perhaps micro-bush
        6 million looks more likely when compared to his 140

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        I think W’s biggest problem is that he actually BELIEVED all of that Frankfurt School bu11sh!t – equalism amongst races, all men yearn for freedom, Islam is a religion of peace, blah blah blah blah blah. Cause if he didn’t believe it, then he’s the greatest actor of my lifetime.

        Like

      • carlos danger says:

        W was supposed to be dumb in order to demonize Christians. He and all of the Bushes are generationally possessed. So are the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds. Check out the Skull and Bones initiation ceremony video on YouTube. Its like the first day of boot camp but in Hell. There is literally some guy playing Satan and they make every effort to be scary. It is perverse and mirrors what people who have experienced Hell in NDEs have said. I would say it is psychological preparation for eternal damnation. Considering that they become the Bohemian Club after graduation, there is more to this than meets the eye.

        Like

  24. Publius says:

    Hire a woman, hire a problem. http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/23/media/fox-news-andrea-tantaros-lawsuit/index.html lolzozzoz Cux News gets what it deserves for supposedly being a conservative voice while actually being another branch of Satan while using playboy models to read teleprompters and bitch off their pretty little air heads about matters best left to discussion only be men.

    I hope Cux totally collapses, the men have heart attacks, and each of the supermodel “journalists” gets hit by a train.

    Fuck all these “conservative” women. Not possible and we don’t need them to speak for us.

    Feminism and the last 60 years is a fail. New sheriff in town.

    Like

    • Publius says:

      Liked by 1 person

      • Publius says:

        Like some man said a few months ago, it’s funny how “conservative” women who think they are on our side think that, after the revolution, there will still generally be this world of grrrl power with women free to be half naked in the streets without any fear and a thing called Fox News where hotties like this get paid millions to supposedly be a voice of conservatism.

        They are unable to envision the actual future.

        Like

      • oink says:

        the jaw!

        Like

    • Tarl Cabot says:

      Fox is collapsing in real time. It has become a parody of itself. Ailes’ defenestration is the beginning of the end. If Trump does lose the election, I sincerely hope he starts a competing network.

      Like

  25. Pwn says:

    Lol@dumb bitch saying there’s a neurochemical effect of watching porn for men, but an emotional one for women with porn books. Emotions are a neurochemical effect. How did she get licensed in anything?

    Like

  26. Berzerker says:

    Thousands of women were obsessed with Ted Bundy…

    Like

  27. tj smith says:

    severus snape + draco malfoy get alot of romance fanfiction about them.

    Like

  28. Franklin says:

    Every girl I’ve dated here in broken DC who was open about her porn interests (always unsolicited info, of course), was into one genre in particular: DP or gangbng. The more I read, the more experience, the more I observe – this makes a good deal of sense.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. Amasius says:

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/inside-donald-trump%E2%80%99s-new-strategy-to-counter-the-view-of-many-that-he-is-%E2%80%98racist%E2%80%99/ar-BBvYl8o?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

    “Trump is planning trips to urban areas — with stops at churches, charter schools and small businesses in black and Latino communities — and is developing an empowerment agenda based on the economy and education, aides said. Under consideration is an early September visit to Detroit, where retired neurosurgeon and former Republican primary rival Ben Carson would guide him on a tour of the impoverished neighborhoods where he grew up.”

    “Clinton led Trump by 91 percent to 3 percent among blacks and 70 percent to 25 percent among Hispanics in an average of July and August Post-ABC polls.”

    Jesus Tapdancing Christ. The muds in the comment section are laughing at him. He should just quit and let them nominate Jeb or Kasich if he’s going to carry on with this embarrassing bullshit.

    Like

    • plumpjack says:

      patience brother. running reassurance game on niggers and wetbacks is the price one has to pay for changing the system from within the system. we have to get Trump in office, whatever takes. the Trump bloodline has Aryan-friendly empire-building written into its genetic code.

      it’ll take him awhile to build his power bloc, but it will happen. let the monkeys laugh now. they won’t be laughing when the lion comes to eat them on January 20th, 2017.

      Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Don’t be confused on this Amasius. Trump’s not a dummy on those facts, and knows whatever he does, he will only get another 5-10% increase, max, of the black and ‘Hispanic’ (i.e., the low-IQ browns and blacks who happen to speak Spanish) vote. He also knows that no matter what you throw at the black ‘community’ in terms of aid, it will all be for naught, as has been the billions of dollars wasted on trying to improve their lot since the late 1950s. A hopeless race. His true target is the media…so that they cannot peddle him off a a wacccist, and the weak Whites teeter-tottering on the fence between TheCunt and TheDon, believing some of the lies peddled by the Leftist scum in the media. So, it’s just good PR for him. He is picking up whatever straddlers that he can, knowing that his base is solid and will not be leaving him in November.

      Like

    • oink says:

      he has to mollify the cucks, de-energize the ethnic lib base (and BTW blax are tired of naggers, too), and so on

      it also pushes Clinton into going into ghettoes – where the chance of unscripted moment increases exponentially

      and it gives him ammo for the debates

      “while I was in Louisiana you were kissing Rothschild’s ass in Martha’s Vineyard; when I was in Detroit you were schmoozing with the Silicon Valley limousine liberals”

      Like

    • Tarl Cabot says:

      For once, the libtards are right. Notice that Trump makes his appeals to blacks in front of all-white audiences? His real targets are white women, who are herd animals. They have no independent opinions about anything, except their own children, that the herd does not first validate. Women fear social ostracism more than anything, so the need their herd to tell them it’s OK to vote for Trump.

      Enter Kellyanne Conway…

      Like

      • Amasius says:

        How could we be so stupid as to give them the vote? Giving blacks the vote was terrorism by the North against the South, or by LBJ against White people, but giving WOMEN the vote, voluntarily? What the hell? Like literally it would make more sense to give suffrage to 7-year-olds.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Bill Brasky says:

        After seeing how you guys carry on over this fake ass pandering jew puppet POS Trump, I’m convinced even grown white men shouldn’t “vote”.

        Like

  30. Publius says:

    The Jew will not stop until it is stopped.

    ESPN’s ‘The Undefeated’ Turns Lochte into Symbol of White Privilege
    http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/culture/bruce-bookter/2016/08/23/espns-undefeated-turns-lochte-symbol-white-privilege

    Like

    • Publius says:

      Quite fucking obviously the only thing wrong about Lochte’s version is what actually happened was worse in accordance with third world brown Brazil. He was robbed at gunpoint by ACTUALLY Brazilian brown police, not men dressed up as police. Duh.

      There was no vandalism. Drunken urination is not vandalism. Drunken peeing does not justify extortion at gun point by police and, later, Brazil the country.

      Any red pill man who followed this story understands these things.

      Like

      • Amasius says:

        Ryan Lochte is turned into a villain by the (((media))), the gunwielding robbing Brownzilians victims, and Lochte ashamedly falls on his sword for no reason. This sick fucking country.

        Like

    • Publius says:

      ((((valkenberg)))), you are not “my fellow white people”, kike.

      #weknow

      Liked by 2 people

    • Lichthof says:

      The Guardian did same

      Like

  31. Publius says:

    Like

  32. John Bonaccorsi, Phila says:

    Am going by very-vague memory of something I read, oh, more than two decades ago now. Late Eighteenth Century–i.e., Enlightenment time, French Revolution time: public libraries, in England, are something new, a sort of “progressive” development. Theretofore, I gather, “library” had meant only a room in a house, its book room–like “the library” in the board game Clue. Now, the wealthy were basically making their libraries available to the masses, whose resultant elevation would, of course, usher in utopia; hence, “public library,” which seems almost redundant nowadays.

    The result was that the word “library” developed a bad odor, like that of, say, “pool hall,” or of “movie house” in conservative American precincts in the early twentieth century. In our own time, use of libraries is pushed upon the young; but in that early period of public libraries, the places were of some ill repute, i.e., locales where young women might read racy writing. “Would you let your daughter visit a LIBRARY?”

    Again: Don’t hold me to this. It’s just something I half-remember from one brief reference in a book about, I think, the French Revolution.

    Like

    • Pwn says:

      Come visit Eastern European villages if you want to notice this level of retardation in the 21st century. All these ideas are the type spread by the village’s gossip and they stem from a narrow minded understanding of the world. They’re as contemptible as the other village idiot: the busybody.

      Like

    • uh says:

      No, I’ve read the same. Vulgarization wouldn’t appeal to those who profited from, or invested in, learning. Either you had books in your possession, which meant you had need of them or the leisure to collect, or you were rabble and books were useless. I remember a quote by Voltaire about pocket-sized books being critical to the Revolution: incendiary tracts could be carried in one’s breast-pocket for spreading the word quickly.

      Like

    • uh says:

      Pwn,

      Do you ever regard the village busybody type and wonder how humans ever rose above all the group traction of that stage?

      Like

  33. Mahdi says:

    Okay, it’s a crisis – but can’t people see that this is also what lets Game succeed?

    Look at it this way – as you point out, guys are visual, which is why their porn is visual. So a woman who can plug into that – by a combination of good looks, dressing right, moving right etc. (hinting at the possibility of replicating in real life what a guy sees in porn), she’s going to be able to bypass his rational thought and get a significant advantage.

    For women, their porn is words and feelings. Guys can use words – Game – to plug into the same instincts revealed and reinforced by the romance novel porn.

    “Give me five minutes to talk away my face, and I shall bed the Queen of France.”

    Like

    • PA says:

      President Trump’s first executive order will be to flog everyone who uses “guys” and “women” in the same sentence.

      [CH: the flogging shall continue until testosterone level improves.]

      Liked by 1 person

    • Greg Eliot says:

      I don’t know who said it, but more pithily put:

      Men fall in love with their eyes, women with their ears.

      Like

  34. Anonymous says:

    To add: a 15 year old boy will get kicked out of a bookstore if he attempts to purchase a penthouse mag.

    A 15 year old girl will get a receipt if she attempts to purchase rape fantasy novels.

    Liked by 1 person

  35. Tom says:

    Well, Amazon’s claims that only 40 self-published authors are making money is a bit of a statistical lie. They are omitting to say that female porn authors are cleaning up. And there is female porn that will bug your eyes out.

    LOL, how about dino-rotic novels?

    I happen to know that a dinos & dragons porn author is making more money from her kindle books than her engineer boyfriend brings home. Think about that! You can look at her Amazon author page here

    https://www.amazon.com/Christie-Sims/e/B00CMBW1PC

    Liked by 1 person

  36. quixotic says:

    This is freaking hilarious

    So reddit is freaking out because fans of Trump have turned the site from a liberal safe space into a painful (read: honest and realistic) forum.

    The video was posted to a thread and people familiar with reality noticed that hey all these thieves have something in common…

    That did not go over well with the censorship loving lefties who dont like that
    reality doesn’t match up with their oasis of equality. Now the thread is nearly scrubbed of comments that discuss the fact that the thieves are all dindus. Every day we get closer to 1984.

    Also thanks for your help fellas i picked up my first AR this weekend people were in a frenzy for a m m o and finding lowers

    Like

  37. Anonymous says:

    Previous issue. I disagree, beauty IS in the eye of the beholder, and because I am not from Mars nor antilope centauri, those measurements seem quite fine to me.

    My friend however, the horse, disagrees with me, at every whinny stating, I wouldn’t merry her even if she was the last bioform alive, she would break.

    And so much, for those truths, beauty indeed being in the eye of the beholder.

    Like

  38. Dale Gribble says:

    Anyone remember a scene from Mad Men where Joan shows Peggy how to wrap her copy of Lady Chatterlys Lover in brown paper so she could read it on the subway without anyone disturbing her?

    Like

  39. […] The crisis of female porn addiction. […]

    Like

  40. scientivore says:

    I had an addiction to erotica, since I have an eidetic imagination. I couldn’t stop until my brain got burned out on it. And since it’s mostly written by women, for women, I can tell you that they are freaky. Also, the romance genre is horribly misnamed; there is nothing tragic about getting all your needs met. It’s like women don’t even understand the concept, and can’t tell it from pragmatism.

    Like

  41. swebf says:

    This article is absolutely incredible.

    Posts like this are the reason I never stop coming to the CH

    Like

  42. flyingtiger says:

    Women who read murder mysteries are the worse. Avoid them!

    Like

Leave a Reply