Feed on
Posts
Comments

Pussy-vision

An early 30s woman I know through a lover likes to regale friends who will listen with tales of her sordid sex life. (If you want to know what happens to a woman’s vagina if she’s still single by her thirties, think of a flowering rose…mashed into a slab of ground beef.)

One of her adventures included a break-up with a caddish loafer, followed by a two month-long rebound “””boyfriend””” who was dumped one month after her ex-jerkboy sent her a two word text (accompanied by a thumbs up emoji) at 1am: “wut up”. Sometime during her fling with the rebound, she openly stated when he was out of earshot that he wasn’t a serious contender and that little did he know she was fucking her ex-jerkboy on the side (her ardor obviously reignited by his eloquent late-night text). Oh, and to add colorful detail to the story, since she “didn’t have those kinds of feelings” for the rebound boyfriend, she withheld her pussy from him and only permitted mouth and anal access.

To her ex-jerkboy’s credit, he wisely said no to getting back together in a relationship context.

Let me just preface here that the clearest view of women’s true sexual nature is from the vantage point of a man who has gotten “in”, in every sense of the preposition, with a crowd of attractive young women. You will hear, and sometimes see, and occasionally participate in, everything that the average bumbling beta male does not. If observed patterns at the individual level are indicative of general behavior at the societal level, then the view is a disillusioning one indeed for those who nurture a streak of quaint romanticism.

A thought intrudes: What would the sexual market look like if all men, appeasing betas included, had first-hand knowledge of women’s most intimate goings-on? Women have a vested interest in maintaining a quasi-lockdown on unsanitized information about their sexual behavior reaching the mass audience of potential male suitors. But if men had Pussy-vision — that is, if men could see women’s secret world through the cylindrical scope of their vaginas — how would the sexual market change?

Would, say, the rebound man in the story above, if Pussy-vision pinkly illuminated the world of women for him, have continued dating and investing his time and money and energy into this girl who refused him her vagina but gave it freely and furtively and concurrently to an ex who invested nothing in her that didn’t require more than a perfunctory text solicitation?

What about other female behaviors that most men, especially White men, consider distasteful or even depraved and evidence that the woman exhibiting them is unworthy of marriage, or a carton of Skittles on her birthday? How would the typical White man respond if he suddenly knew that the bubbly HR girl he has started dating once shacked up with a black guy who left her with a bruise and an abortion?I’ll cut to the lace.

These rhetorical questions answer themselves. If Pussy-vision were real, the sexual market would change radically, and not to the benefit of women or of society. You’d see a lot more pump and dumping, a lot fewer engagement rings and $40K wedding circuses, and increased market demand for sexbots, virtual reality porn, and libido-numbing interventions.

Alpha males would hesitate more to commit, greater beta males would kick out the last leg of their pussy pedestal and consequently score with more women, lesser beta males would shy from asking girls out even more than they already do, and omega males would, to women’s consternation, become bolder in asking for raunchy sex, not unjustifiably assuming that skanks who have taken it up the pooper on first dates might not have a properly functioning discretion filter.

These would be the immediate effects. Eventually, (if Pussy-vision were real), the wholesale abandonment of men from the LTR and marriage market would drive women’s behaviors in the direction of chasteness, modesty, low partner count, deference to male prerogative, and vulnerable femininity, (and away from mudsharking, you bet your ass). Hmm, not unlike how it used to be prior 1960 or thereabouts.

So, did pre-1960 American men have Pussy-vision? In a way, they did. No, they weren’t seeing the world close-up through women’s vaginas, but the culture was a healthy one that acted as a proxy Pussy-vision instrument, instructing men in the traits and behaviors of women who are worthy of long-term investment. Men didn’t need to spend years in the banging trenches to learn the true nature of women; they had fathers (and mothers!) and friends and institutions teaching them, forthrightly or round-aboutly, the shapely contours and tell-tale demeanor of the marriage-worthy woman.

What has happened since then is the warehousing of Pussy-vision out of sight of the everyday man. In a way, Pussy-vision is real, but now only for a select few alpha lords who have the key to the secret garden and a peen’s-eye-view of unkempt, chaotic, dizzyingly feral female sexuality. For the rest, the culture has not only jettisoned the concept of Pussy-vision, it actively works to promote the opposite of Pussy-vision:

Beaver-blindness.

Which would not be such a mentally handicapping thing if women were, in fact, worthy of investment. Beaver-blindness is the benefit of the doubt women receive when they are truly keeping up their end of the bargain: namely, don’t have an N-count that could rival a porn star’s and don’t delude yourself into thinking ass sex is an acceptable virginity-preserving substitute.

But Beaver-blindness is metadeath to the idealistic man living during an era of unrestricted female licentiousness, either as practiced or as imbibed by a go-girl propaganda machine that encourages and glorifies sexual amorphism and the taking on by women of the traditional roles and behaviors normally associated with male sexuality. Beaver-blindness is wilful castration when pussy is liberated from male expectation and discernment. It’s basically telling women, “Do what you will, I have neither the inclination nor the capacity to judge your worth as a lover and a partner in life.”

Naturally, women HATE HATE HATE nonjudgmental men who let them get away with the farm, (even as they tell social scientist surveyors and gullible male feminists the opposite). The only counter to liberated pussy is donning the Pussy-vision goggles and treating women exactly how they allow themselves to be treated. This will improve the enwhitened man’s love life and may, paradoxically, persuade women to reject the liberation of their sex.

199 Responses to “Pussy-vision”

  1. Sentient says:

    from the vantage point of a man who has gotten “in”, in every sense of the preposition, with a crowd of attractive young women. You will hear, and sometimes see, and occasionally participate in, everything that the average bumbling beta male does not.

    True in love, true in life. If you have a seat at the table, everyone assumes you should be at the table. So be at the table.

    Like

    • Sentient says:

      Oh.. and then act like you’ve been at the table before…!

      Liked by 1 person

    • Ponce du Lion says:

      This the poz literally, the fucking poz.
      The number of antibiotics we can made is limited by the number of bassic for life or infection proteins and other biological compounds whose targeting by medicines can kill pathogens and by how different between them are the antibiotics we can made.
      The number is indeed low because antibiotics belong to families with molecular resemblance. So the really difficult step for bacterias is adaption the first time, then resistance becomes much more easier for similar antibiotics.
      For example this “new” teixobactin targets the same molecule than vancomycin, although I suppose that both are structurally unrelated.
      We are literally pozzed. In general the bio resistance issues manifest our fracase as society. Can’t be better proof of laissez-faire fracase. All while cutting our natural rights. Fuck the ZOG.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        From the wiki on Teixobactin: “It is not active against bacteria with an outer membrane such as gram negative pathogens, particularly carbapenem resistant enterobacteriaceae, or those with New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase 1 (NDM1).”

        So ana1 is still a no-go.

        Like

      • Some Guy says:

        From the wiki on Teixobactin: “It is not active against bacteria with an outer membrane such as gram negative pathogens, particularly carbapenem resistant enterobacteriaceae, or those with New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase 1 (NDM1).”

        So ana1 is still a no-go.

        That’s true enough, but Teixobactin was developed from a new process which is expected to yield many novel antibiotics:

        The screening of soil microor­gan­isms has pro­duced most antibi­otics, but only 1 per­cent of them will grow in the lab, and this lim­ited resource was over­mined in the 1960s, Lewis explained. He and Epstein spent years seeking to address this problem by tap­ping into a new source of antibi­otics beyond those cre­ated by syn­thetic means: uncul­tured bac­teria, which make up 99 per­cent of all species in external envi­ron­ments. They devel­oped a novel method for growing uncul­tured bac­teria in their nat­ural envi­ron­ment, which led to the founding of Novo­Bi­otic. Their approach involves the iChip, a minia­ture device Epstein’s team cre­ated that can iso­late and help grow single cells in their nat­ural envi­ron­ment and thereby pro­vides researchers with much improved access to uncul­tured bac­teria. Novo­Bi­otic has since assem­bled about 50,000 strains of uncul­tured bac­teria and dis­cov­ered 25 new antibi­otics, of which teixobactin is the latest and most inter­esting, Lewis said.

        Link:

        http://www.northeastern.edu/news/2015/01/kim-lewis-teixobactin-nature-paper/

        Like

  2. Nads says:

    Da bitchezz need a firm pump hand.

    Like

  3. plumpjack says:

    “…. may, paradoxically, persuade women to reject the liberation of their sex.”

    does it also motivate them to push for an influx of men with lower standards, via open borders? have their cock carousel and eat it too, kinda thing?

    Like

    • Laguna Beach Fogey says:

      I would argue there’s a danger that it does. It may compel White women to simply seek other males from alien population groups–Africans, Arabs, Asians.

      Like

  4. tspark156 says:

    Low IQ, propensity to violence, and poor impulse control. The Black Triad, every bit as effective as the dark triad if your standards for white women are lower.

    Like

  5. Ang Aamer says:

    Nothing brings out sloot talk like Alpha Frame combined with amused mastery

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      It’s shocking what chicks will say to you if you simply bother to have a straightforward conversation with them & sit there listening to what they have to say. Within 60 to 90 seconds, you’ll learn the most audaciously vulgar & obscene gossip about every other filthy c*nt in the entire d@mned building.

      Like

  6. karmageddon says:

    This is one for the archives. Brilliant.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. TGP says:

    Seminal piece.

    Like

  8. Ang Aamer says:

    CH,

    I think the difference between an natural Alpha and a learned Alpha is that the learned Alpha gets the Pssyvision channel later in life.

    All of my friends that are more naturally Alpha have stories about their sister(s) doing the real talk with their mothers or other girls. There is nothing like the epiphany of a gaggle of girls frankly discussing the merits of a set of males within a man’s earshot.

    It’s the ultimate what they do vs what they say. Your example of rebound “boyfriend” is perfect. 30+ wants to keep her vag semi chaste to keep alpha ex around. Beta rebound man takes the leftovers.

    If Beta Rebound had been tuning into Pssyvision for awhile he would have already seen this episode. Lack of sexual access + recent big ex = girlfriend back to fcking ex -> Every. Single. Time.

    All one has to do is tune into what a sister or female cousin would say via real talk to you. Unfortunately in the west we have fallen for the egalitarian notion that women are as rational as men. Therefore our logical brain leads us to false conclusions. A man needs to steep his brain in a sea of hormones to feel the randomness that is the female existence.

    If 30+ Go Grrl were rational she would rationally realize that her behavior is not in her long term interest. She is jeopardizing her Beta backup situation for the faint hope of looping in the Alpha cad again, perhaps to make him more LTR suitable. Obviously these ideas are fantasy. But women live fantasy daily. Until one day they look in the mirror to a noticeably post 40 face and see reality.

    Like

    • Colonel Hogan says:

      @Ang Aamer
      I would argue that even when you do overhear the chictalk you still have to remember that it’s what they DO, not what they SAY. They still don’t want to be seen as the slut of the group so they still SAY things.

      Like

  9. Publius says:

    (((They))) continue to taunt us. Women should not be allowed to vote, let alone be President or Prime Minister of a country. Duh.

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/13/europe/theresa-may-david-cameron-british-prime-minister/index.html

    She supported remain and still she is installed. Direct thumb up the nose to the white men of the country.

    Like

    • Ironpusher says:

      The cuck is strong in that nation. Having spent some time in western Europe, I figure they’re about 10 years ahead of us on the left leaning cuck curve. Hopefully we never get that far, but if TheCunt gets in office it will be “hello haji!”

      SAD!!!

      Like

      • tspark156 says:

        Like America, the UK is governed by traitors, and outside of the pussy chattering classes in non-black city suburbs, White men are just as aware of what is going on as they are on your side of the pond. Rural areas in the UK are the last remaining bastions of firearm ownership and were starting to wonder why the armed populace percentage in America hasn’t done anything to overthrow tyranny since the late seventeen hundreds.

        Like

      • Publius says:

        We all have the “prisoners’ dilemma” or externalities problem. Any one man who acts will simply be treated as a criminal. Not sure what would cause all 60 million to act at once. Will take a total collapse of the monetary system, I guess.

        Like

      • tspark156 says:

        Publius.
        I think your reply illustrates how we are all similarly fucked, in that it will probably take the loss of everything worth fighting for, to bring about the action that was needed to save it.

        Like

      • Publius says:

        Tspark I agree. Sad.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “Not sure what would cause all 60 million to act at once. Will take a total collapse of the monetary system, I guess.”

        This is where BLM may be doing us all a huge favor. an imminent takeover by a semi-coordinated group of subhumans just might provide a jolt to the sleeping enablers sooner than financial collapse will. just keep giving them plenty of rope.

        they’re easily exploited by BOTH sides. the right will soon be able to say “see? jim crow laws existed for a reason.”

        Like

      • Publius says:

        Tommorow night will be interesting. They are literally planning to riot in every major city and I predict violence in at least some of them. There is a possibility of a “final straw” moment that could lead to…. what? Some say (((they))) want this to declare martial law, so even after it starts whites will not be free to take care of what they deserve.

        Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        With regard to “what will it take?”, “when will we act?”, and related collapse scenarios, economic or social, Venezuela is having their collapse today. For the United States, you can be sure that there is not 15 years left, and perhaps not ten.

        I have previously posted a link here from that most mainstream of all sources, Ambrose Evans Pritchard of the Daily Telegraph, explaining that Saudi Arabia must stop oil exports somewhere between 2025 and 2030.

        The 2012 article was from his blog and was entitled “Saudi Oil Well Dries Up”.

        I have recently tried a number of times to find that article again but it seems to have disappeared. No matter, I kept a copy of it. So I should be able to use that copy to link to it, right? But I can’t. So I have tried other ways to find it on the web, such as journalisted.com, but no, the article is not listed and seems to have evaporated.

        Funnily, searching the Telegraph’s archive did not find it either. But it did offer me a link to “History’s greatest conspiracy theories”.

        Maybe I am a poor researcher. Can any of you find it?

        Alright, forget about that. Instead, let me recommend a different link with something closer to home for US citizens. It discuses the US energy situation today and for the near future for the US transport situation, in particular trucking.

        Ignore the occasional Red team Blue team stuff – that doesn’t matter – and just listen. The second half of the podcast is the best. It provides the most thorough, persuasive and accessible explanation that I have ever come across of why there will be no last minute technological stick saves.

        The link is

        http://kunstler.com/podcast/kunstlercast-278-alice-friedemann-trucks-stop-running/

        And spare us all the “It’s Kunstler, he’s a liberal cheespope” stuff. Yeh, I know. Just listen. The discussion is 95% meaty facts.

        Then pull your kids out of school and take your family somewhere isolated and coastal. Learn to row, sail and fish. The way I see it, offshore is the only place we’ll be able to escape the zombies.

        Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      I feel sorry for the average, conservative Brit, but as a Nation, I have to say that (in punishment for WWII) karma is a bitch. If this were not directly affecting my people, I would have no problem saying that this present state in the UK is justly deserved for the audacious pomposity of the British at all levels in their desire to fight Germany instead of sue for peace (or, better, never give Poland a war guaranty and start the whole mess).

      Like

    • Glengarry says:

      Days after Leave winning the election, there is an off-stage coup and a Remain prime minister is installed. Media and establishment quietly ecstatic, though there is of course spittle-flecked rage that Boris Johnson, election winner, gets an appointment at all.

      My faith in democracy is restored.

      Like

      • tspark156 says:

        I was, and remain in favour of leave, but I was floored by the result because I just figured the vote would have been fixed. The conspiracy theorist in me can only surmise that the result must suit the globalist agenda in some perverse way.

        Like

    • Publius says:

      Being that there is a race war on, which was started by Jews and Africans, it seems crazy that BLM would broadcast the exact time and location of each of their platoons’ movements. Hmmm. As somebody said, the law and police — right now — exist to protect blacks from whites, not the other way around. It’s 60 million white gun owners who have ammo and know how to use their weapons vs about 3 million Africans. Yes, there are 42 million Africans in the United States. Only 3 million, at most, are males who own a gun and ammo and know how to use it. Probably a much lower number.

      After everything that has happened, after everything we predicted, after 65 years of a blatant attack on our nation, still these BLM idiots get to go out and promise, in advance, to wreck our nation’s cities, without fear of catching any .308 rounds sent from any rooftops. Nope. We whites are to use this information to know where not to be — to cower in our homes on this Friday night.

      Like

      • Publius says:

        Otsuka and anyone who is not a white parent, not sure if you know, but the photo at that link is on point accurate. If you have white children and you take them to the park, you know that indeed niglets will touch your children just exactly as in that photo. And their mama will not tell them not to. They literally look like a fascinated animal and do exactly like in that pic.

        Like

      • Publius says:

        lolzozoz, to add a bit of happiness to this discussion: If you train regularly at a shooting range, you will notice that, despite the media/Hollywood attempt to make us fear “gangstas”, very, very few blacks have any skills, at all, with a gun. Very few of them actually own a gun, first of all — at the range, they RENT a gun. You will see young “teens” at the range on a date with a girl they are trying to impress. They rent a Glock 19 and get a few boxes and one can tell they have very little experience shooting.

        Even if they own a gun, they don’t have the funds to shoot more than a few boxes of ammo. They are happy to hit the target from 7 yards (20 inch group) as their date giggles and hoots and hollers.

        If you go in there as a badass white man who has put thousands of rounds down range, ignore them, talk to no one, and shoot your normal 250 rounds (handgun session) like you are training (not on a giggling date) and rapid fire and put everything inside a 4 inch group at 10 and then 20 yards, people will notice. They will watch you. LEOs and ex SWAT who are operating training businesses will say, “Bro, you can shoot.” Very few blacks, compared to whites, are actually ready for a real war in which whites would fight back (after total economic collapse).

        Also, very few of them own modern sporting rifles or any store of ammo.

        Like

      • Corvo says:

        “After everything that has happened, after everything we predicted, after 65 years of a blatant attack on our nation, still these BLM idiots get to go out and promise, in advance, to wreck our nation’s cities, without fear of catching any .308 rounds sent from any rooftops. Nope. We whites are to use this information to know where not to be — to cower in our homes on this Friday night.”

        Publius – I’m not pessimistic on this point. This cannot continue, and therefore it will not continue. The fuse on White retaliation is long, but it’s already lit and these Black Lies thugs are blowing on it, speeding it along.

        “Our” cities are in truth already alien to real Americans — they’re full of dindus, beaners, and race-cucked shit-tier White traitors. Let them burn. No Black Lies mob will be ransacking my neighborhood, nor yours, I suspect, without resistance.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        French Intel Chief’s Stunning Warning: Europe Is “On Brink Of Civil War” Migrant Sex Attacks http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3449251/posts

        Like

    • Ironpusher says:

      @publius

      That’s because they’re going around tearing up their own neighborhoods/public spaces. They may not be very smart, but they know better than to start tearing up white neighborhoods. They don’t want a world where 60 million “good ol boys” are open carrying kalishnikov’s on their front lawns. We still have numbers on our side………for now.

      Like

      • mendo says:

        Yup. I saw the one in LA, just to prepare, but it’s in a shitty (take your pic) location and not anywhere near a nice area.

        Like

      • Publius says:

        Lake Eola in downtown Orlando is a beautiful should-be-peaceful area. I notice that the plan in Miami is to be in Browntown.

        Like

  10. sigsawyer says:

    What you call Pussyvision threw me hard the first time, like that movie where the guy puts the glasses on and starts seeing subliminal messages. It was a FWB I was trying hard to keep at a distance and not develop feelings for- didn’t need any help after hearing about some of the shit she did.

    Like

  11. Sean Fielding says:

    “Oh, and to add colorful detail to the story, since she “didn’t have those kinds of feelings” for the rebound boyfriend, she withheld her pussy from him and only permitted mouth and anal access.”

    That’s her hierarchy? Chalk another to how fucked-up sexual freedom makes women. Hard to imagine Mr. Rebound boy felt all that beta if he was plundering her ass on a regular basis.

    Like

  12. mendo says:

    So she denied him access to the poon, but gave up her bum and she felt that was okay, as in, she had no shame opening up the poop chute? Forget stringing the guy along, that’s some debased shit right there.

    I’ve led a sheltered life. . . gimme them goggles.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Her Hamster wants the pr3gnancy to be sown with Alpha seed, not Beta seed.

      Like

    • mendo says:

      I heard stories of the good Christian girls from Pepperdine would take in the ass so as to remain chaste. Always thought it was bs or just outliers of the group…man, how wrong I was!

      Like

      • Some Guy says:

        This sort of thing has been done forever in Southern Europe and Latin America. It’s a cultural thing there, or at least was back when virginity was much more highly valued.

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        I heard stories of the good Christian girls from Pepperdine would take in the ass so as to remain chastity
        ———————————————————————————————–
        That practice is described in in the well known historic book entitled
        Annals of Chastity

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Mostly Catholic girls with this reasoning…

        Like

      • JironGhrad says:

        In re: Catholic girls; it’s because Catholics don’t believe in birth control, ergo no other way to stop unwanted pregnancy since, oops… they don’t believe in abortion either. Lots of failed Catholic girls around here.

        Like

      • Corvo says:

        “it’s because Catholics don’t believe in birth control”

        Quaint, but you’re about 3 decades too late with that one. Catholics have been on the birth control program as much as anyone else since I was in high school 25 years ago.

        Like

      • Johnny says:

        The Pope does it too.

        Like

  13. Libertardian says:

    As someone said long ago on FuckedCompany, we’ve spent the last 50 years proving that everything men believed about women for the past 5,000 years was, in fact, true. And what an expensive lesson it has been, the societal equivalent of “learning” why it’s a bad idea to drive on the wrong side of the freeway with the pedal to the floor while drunk and blindfolded.

    “What would the sexual market look like if all men, appeasing betas included, had first-hand knowledge of women’s most intimate goings-on?”

    Women are happy to show betas their ugly sides (including letting said betas see them showing alphas their good sides). It just takes a while for the dots to be connected and the cognitive dissonance to be somewhat resolved (though I think for most it never is entirely, hence the anger).

    The hard-knocks knowledge (and stories like this) don’t inspire me to improve my game so much as to recoil in disgust and think of declining T levels as a blessing in disguise.

    I look at trapped herbs with their screeeching wives and howling brats the way previous generations of men looked at hors de combat in the trenches or at the mangled victims of industrial accidents: there but for the grace of Satan go I.

    Like

  14. Ripp says:

    This reminds me of Tyler Durden’s (owen cook’s) secret society, or whatever it was called, post about being on the inside track of the unchained nature of female sexuality.

    great post.

    Like

    • Sorcerygod says:

      I don’t think female sexuality is THAT unchained — I would say “selectively unchained.”

      I had sex in the bushes with a girl I met within half an hour a few days ago in Toronto (yes I did *sigh* you doubting fucks) but she would NOT have done that with just anybody.

      SELECTIVELY. If you appeal to her, for whatever reason — she wants to turn you into her dog boyfriend/future hubbie, she is in university and wants to experiment with sex after a chaste-ish H.S. life, or she just likes you — THEN she’s unchained.

      But for the rest, she’s chained, sorry to say.

      Like

  15. greginaurora says:

    I disagree. Women would not become more chaste if the Betas were to reject them. The natural state of mankind is the same as the monkey-world: one man with many women. Women don’t have a problem with being one-of-many in a harem, so long as it’s with the right man.

    To bring about chastity again will require the wholesale destruction of our entire culture and civilization. “Pussyvision” may result in women no longer obtaining Betabux, but so long as they can get welfare, section 8, WIC, foodstamps, etc…. they aren’t going to walk away from their natural preference just because the Betas are refusing to make with the Bux. So long as they can get their freemoniez from some other source (which is still the Betas, albeit with the Government acting as a third-party intermediary), then they’re going to keep doing what they want to do.

    Women do not want to have sex with Betas. They’ll do it if they MUST in exchange for provisioning, but the necessity of sex-for-provisioning is nearly all lost.

    BUT, to counter that, when the Betas finally catch on (let’s say by way of pussyvision), it will all come crashing down. When they stop working altogether, there’s not going to be any infrastructure in place to keep the filthy whores safe and sound and “happy” in their freehomez.

    But it’s not going to be rebuilt. Civilization itself has been an aberration. It won’t be replaced. We’ll have more bandits and pirates, and more cities full of walled-off homes with lots of women raising lots of children for the few men that qualify as natural Alphas.

    There is another way…. It requires Betas to acknowledge publicly, loudly, that women are the lesser sex, and refuse them equality. Refuse them access to Government. Simply announce that they’re changing the rules and women no longer have a say. But that will never happen.

    Like

    • Don’t be so defeatist. It makes you sound like a JIDF saboteur.

      Like

      • greginaurora says:

        I respect your statement, as the easiest way to defeat an enemy is to convince him that it’s not worth fighting. I’ve no wish to give the impression that I think we can’t win, nor to give aid and succor to our enemies by allowing him to think that we won’t fight.

        To win, we need to show the Betas what’s in it for them. We need to convince THEM (and they’re the only group that counts) that they need to fight, everyday, against those who wish to humble and humiliate them. Western Civilization is theirs to own and defend.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        We need to TEACH the Betas how to Man Up and DESERVE to be participants in a K-Selected {1-Man}/{1-Woman} society.

        Like

    • Libertardian says:

      “When they stop working altogether, there’s not going to be any infrastructure in place to keep the filthy whores safe and sound and “happy” in their freehomez.”

      Under Hillary I think that’s the endgame (of course, in the socialist tradition she’ll enact productivity quotas and other forms of forced labor, and in the same tradition, economic collapse will follow anyway). My guess is, betas will also help usher in sharia law as payback.

      Like

      • greginaurora says:

        That’s one of the “funnier” parts of our current world order; the very first thing that will happen should the musliman-supporting Lefties win will be official second-class citizen status of the women. No more voting. Everything else would be a$$, but that right there would be….

        Nut: “OK people, we’ve won! $haria is Law!”
        Nutcracker: (Smack)
        Nut: “WTF! How dare you hit me!”
        Nutcracker: (Smack)
        Nut: “What’s your problem?! Who do you think you…”
        Nutcracker: (Smack)
        Nut: “I’m calling the police!”
        Police: “What’s the problem here?”
        Nut: “This man slappe…”
        Police: (Smack) “You’ll speak when you’re spoken to!”
        Nutcracker: “This woman was speaking to me without my permission, then continued to do so despite my correction.”
        Police: (To nut) “Why were you speaking to this man?”
        Nut: “Wha… You hit me? You can’t d…”
        Police: (SMACK) “ANSWER THE QUESTION!”

        I mean, it wouldn’t be worth it, except almost…

        Like

      • Libertardian says:

        The good news is, even poz spigots like the WSJ are suggesting that Ginsberg has lost her mind. Imagine Trump having TWO SCOTUS seats to fill on Inauguration Day alone.

        Like

    • Ponce du Lion says:

      White K selected European women have a problem sharing their men. At least officially.

      Like

    • chris says:

      “To bring about chastity again will require the wholesale destruction of our entire culture and civilization. “Pussyvision” may result in women no longer obtaining Betabux, but so long as they can get welfare, section 8, WIC, foodstamps, etc…. they aren’t going to walk away from their natural preference just because the Betas are refusing to make with the Bux. So long as they can get their freemoniez from some other source (which is still the Betas, albeit with the Government acting as a third-party intermediary), then they’re going to keep doing what they want to do.”

      Men can always leave the West for other countries where their skills are useful. Aged used women, their value is nil to the outside world.

      In fact, if all skilled beats did do this, then the West would collapse not soon after.

      Like

    • Sorcerygod says:

      Betas come in all shapes and colors, psychologically. I would say that, unfortunately, many believe women are equal to them — or if not actually equal, then should be represented as if equal de jure within the framework of society.

      To change beta minds, you would to get into their minds and do some reprogramming. That would actually be interesting. Most of the manipulators of this world are women, using certain cheats they have, based on emotions and false assumptions. To remake a beta ……. hmmm. Probably could be done. Not sure how large a scale though.

      Like

  16. Ripp says:

    I dubbed a term called “CSRs” or “cock sucker rationalizers”. This is in the context of same night sex:

    There are 2 kinds of CSRs:

    1) She’ll suck you off, but wont have vaginal sex to rationalize not being a slut.

    2) She WONT suck you off, but she’ll have vaginal sex (usually unprotected) because she only sucks off her “BFs” and she’s not a slut.

    I’ve seen this play out over all different kinds of women. Dozens upon dozens of times.

    There are even the more obscure same night sex situations. Ive had women refuse to suck me off or fuck, but will jerk me off, lick my balls and asshole, then swallow nut.

    And the strangest one to me is the ones that let you fuck their ass, but not pussy. On the first night. You’re such a good girl!

    The struggle of them being so turned while the frontal lobe hamster rationalizes at Mach 6 million to obsolve themselves of any slutitude.

    The hardest part I think is when you bag a slut and realize -after the fact- she’s in a relationship of some kind.

    Per my comment on the Shiv thread: soul crushing shivs need to be deployed. It does help curb the hyper sluttery.

    Like

    • mendo says:

      And the strangest one to me is the ones that let you fuck their ass, but not pussy.

      I guess they like the pain and shame that accompanies a poop pounding. Crazy. No wonder you never take a girl out to dinner, don’t want any surprises later on.

      Like

  17. oldfury says:

    This reminds me of The Fundamental Premise: a shock of light that forces closed eyes open.

    Like

  18. Wrong Side of History says:

    I think about all the shit I could’ve avoided if I had a male figure to tell me the deal.

    In a healthy society, the red pill is administered by fathers.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Amasius says:

      I can see where you’re coming from. But to everything there is a season. I for one am glad I spent a few years in fantasy land: I never would have written– felt– poetry if I had known the truth from puberty. Innocence to experience, Medieval to Modern.

      Like

  19. mmaier2112 says:

    Women are pathetic whores.

    If they think you’re non-judgmental, they’ll say anything in front of you. I sat at a table with 8 or so broads and I only knew one. They said all kinds of demented shit I’m sure they’d never want their BFs or husbands to hear. It was actually pretty sad listening.

    The various bathos-bathed dramas…

    The (former?) walking blowjob that was using her friend’s phone to Facebook stalk her HS BF while she was out drinking and husband and kids were at home.

    The hottest one was in a loveless semi-relationship with her baby daddy who mostly slept on the sofa and they’d fuck every once in a while. Probably when her near-wall-hitting self needed ego boosts.

    My favorite was them drooling and literally moaning over a phone pic of a dude with huge guns (arms). I think they forgot I was there and neglected to act as though they think huge muscles are gross.

    It’s really pathetic. A group of guys is NEVER going to sit around saying “I think fit, petite women are absolutely disgusting!!!!!” just because women are in earshot.

    Like

    • 88 says:

      “The hottest one was in a loveless semi-relationship with her baby daddy who mostly slept on the sofa and they’d fuck every once in a while. Probably when her near-wall-hitting self needed ego boosts.”

      if they aren’t having sex often, she isn’t going to do it for the ego boost. there is no ego boost if she doesn’t want him or think he’s a valuable man. more likely she is having sex with him occasionally just to get him off her case for rarely putting out.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        88, you totally misread that one, dude!!!

        “mostly slept on the sofa” ——— FOR THE WIN!!!!!

        That dude is an Apex Alpha. He’s so awesome that the Beta Bux Providers don’t even show up on his radar. Beta Bux? ALPHA FUX!!!!!

        We are not worthy.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        I’m laughing myself silly. We really are not worthy.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “mostly slept on the sofa” ——— I’m laughing so hard I can barely breath.

        Like

  20. Libertardian says:

    ‘NBC describes Giuliani as “far-right.”‘

    Already flushed down the memory hole:

    ‘Former New York City Major Rudy Giuliani will also speak. The [removed: far-right] former mayor, who ran New York City during the 9/11 attacks and is extremely conservative on national security issues, has often defended Trump’s more controversial policies on homeland security.’

    15 years ago he was a hero; now the megaphone tells us he was just “there”, Forrest Gump style. Sic transit gloria…

    Like

    • Corvo says:

      To paraphrase John Derbyshire: When was the last time you heard any politician or public figure described as “far-left”?

      Like

      • Libertardian says:

        Hell, the script probably tells them to refer to Lenin and Stalin, with a straight face, as far right (maybe if you get far enough left you wrap around to the other side).

        Like

  21. Kermittheefrog777 says:

    So in other words, Hillary is American women:

    If the surveilance state were to expose their whoring, the whole circus tent would collapse.

    So lips remain sealed. (The male ones anyway).

    Like

  22. Ponce du Lion says:

    Sometimes I think I’m a misogynist. No healthy man can love the natural state of women.
    Each day a question rises stronger in my mind.
    Do sexbots dream of electronic alphas?

    Like

  23. Driver says:

    Young men need to realize that women (all women) are looking for the best deal, period. They’ll rationalize the shit out of anything if they think it will get them one step closer to what they want….like children.

    I think of women as 5 year olds with no money in a candy store. They’ll do or say anything to get a few bucks from you to buy some candy. All men need to realize this fact and deal with it accordingly. I treat women like I do children: I don’t take them seriously and I laugh at them (a lot). Too many men try to please these very entitled women and it gets them no where (except handing out free goodies or paying for something) – idiots.

    More men just need to tell them “no” out the gate (because they don’t hear that word enough) and they must understand that she’s probably been banged like a drum since she was 18 (or less). Women are no longer shamed by society and they are encouraged to be sluts, openly (they call it sexual freedom or liberation)…it’s just a slut being open about it- remind her about it from time to time and you’ll go far. Men are too worried about pissing women off when in fact giving it to them straight is the best way “in”.

    Liked by 2 people

  24. george says:

    Word on the street, Los Angelea uppermiddleclass whites, according to paremta i know, is that all the highschoolers are doing anal to practice safe sex

    Like

  25. george says:

    According to parents

    Like

  26. Mr Meaner says:

    This topic came up with a mate the other day.

    He said the advice I give him about women was mostly useless to him because I’m in what he calls “the 1% of men who can get away with doing anything to women, based on your looks.”

    He’s blown away by some of things I tell him about my plates. The way they behave sexually (mostly submissive), what they do for me, and especially what they do *to* me. When I describe it to him his mouth drops open like one of those sideshow clowns, and he says I live in a parallel universe.

    When I try and redpill him and tell him that ALL women are, deep down, capable of behaving like this, he refuses to believe it, preferring to invest in the notion that I have some sort of special power that gets me into the secret garden (I do – game).

    He has beaver blindness.

    The longer a man goes without pussy vision, the harder it is for him to lose beaver blindness, because it requires a concession that everything he knows or was taught, is wrong.

    P.S – I won’t deny looks have an impact. But I’ve tried it without game. It’s not nearly the same.

    Like

  27. Moses says:

    I remember discovering “pussy-vision” when I was first getting into game about 10 years ago.

    I opened a pretty girl in a crowded bar sometime in May. After a few minutes of charging her tingles, she said “I need to get back to my dad and my boyfriend.”

    “Introduce me!” I said. And she did.

    After some small talk with dad and bf I number closed her on the sly.

    Turns out her father was in town for her university graduation. Her bf looked like a handsome herb.

    Women are absolutely not to be trusted. They are ruled by tingles. It is what it is. Conduct yourself accordingly.

    Like

    • Sorcerygod says:

      Women can be trusted if you dominate them and if they live in terror of you punishing their lie transgressions with your abandonment of them.

      Like

  28. Moses says:

    OT: Just when I think the GOP can’t be more cucked they outdo themselves.

    Justice Ginsberg made openly political comments against the nominee from one of the two largest political parties. Repeatedly.

    Trump called on her to resign. It is the honorable thing to do. Sitting Justices cannot openly favor political candidates. It’s just not proper.

    And yet GOP cucks say things like Ryan’s “this is outside the realm” (wtf?) yet fall short of calling on her to resign.

    Goddamn cucks.

    Like

    • mendo says:

      She tried walking them back and said she’d be more “circumcision, er, circumspect” in the future, but the damage is done.

      Like

      • Corvo says:

        (((Ginsberg))) makes a sniveling, pathetic attempt at apologizing, saying that her remarks were “ill-advised” . . . tell me, Jew — who “advised” you to try to stump the Trump? No wonder people fucking hate lawyers.

        Like

      • Glengarry says:

        Even the left hated on her after a while. I guess they wanted to keep their cucked court system intact.

        Doesn’t change the fact that her mind is shot and she should retire.

        Like

      • Moses says:

        In a way she did all of us a favor. Let people see what’s really happening.

        Race is politics, and politics is race.

        Like

  29. kwag says:

    From my 17 year old female students to my 70 something female academic chairperson boss, every female will gossip the most vulgar things about other b*tches. Females stop maturing emotionally during their late teenage years.

    Like

    • Sorcerygod says:

      The female gender is an amazing combination of bitter backstabbing and absolute obedience to The Sisterhood. On the surface, they all hate each other, but when push comes to shove, they obey the commands of the female Persons (check my website for more info).

      Just FWI: According to women, “Persons” are women who make decisions for the group, “People’ are an anonymous blob of no-vote-having women who just obey ………

      And “things” are men.

      That’s their vocabulary, not mine.

      Like

  30. Johnny Redux says:

    And feminists hags, fearing that girls might want to actually be good [and, ergo, hurt the efforts of feminism as one of many tentacles of the (((radical Left))) as it marches forward to destroy the West], have to put out garbage like this:

    Could not find any real, solid nationality background on Ms. ‘Valenti’. I am guessing that it is not her real name. She seems like a member of the Tribe.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      The use of the word “obsession” is a Big Tell. Yidspeak.

      Not to mention that it’s laughable, these days, to say America has any interest whatsoever in virginity, let alone an “obsession”.

      Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Well, if she is not a member of the Tribe, she certainly is doing its bidding (for profit and gain, on her end, of course….oh, and for that all-important ATTENTION, with which the Leftist media is more than willing provide her in order to get her trash known to as many impressionable young women as possible) by publishing these types of books.

      Like

    • Publius says:

      her twitter easy to find. link in mod.

      Like

    • cortesar says:

      Here she is
      Why we are not surprised
      Father was an “Italian Buddhist”
      Jeez that is serious a fuck-up, to abandon a life loving credo of his ancestors for that sterile eastern cult

      Like

    • cortesar says:

      As Jessica said young things are heart by America obsession with virginity and purity

      LOLZZZZZZZZZ

      Like

    • whorefinder says:

      That second from the left girl (the “L”) has the most delectable jailbait face I’ve seen in a long time.

      I think I need some time to myself.

      Wait till she’s legal rape!

      Like

    • Corvo says:

      The girls’ parents should be tarred and feathered. And the girls should each lose about 20 pounds.

      Like

  31. chris says:

    He was dating an early thirties woman. There’s the problem. (Unless the guy was in his 50’s).

    Like

  32. M. M. says:

    ot–for a cheap laugh:
    http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/everything-we-know-about-the-cat-living-at-10-downing-street

    David Cameron introduced Larry the cat to Barack Obama when the U.S. president visited Number 10 in June, 2011. The U.K. Prime Minster told the BBC that Larry, who is famously unfriendly towards men, got on well with Mr. Obama.

    Like

  33. cortesar says:

    Jeez more time passes more it proves me right
    The Cunt or Him prepare to die in the desert somewhere between Damascus and Tehran
    While you test your blood think about (((our greatest ally) and die happy
    That is his message to the significant number of people who brought him where he is today, believing that he is one of them

    Is President Obama trying to destroy Israel with all his bad moves? Think about it and let me know!

    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 13, 2016

    Like

    • Amasius says:

      I hope, but can’t prove, that he’s just saying that shit to get the retarded fucking “conservative” “evangelicals” to vote for him. The indispensable Ted Cruz Israel and fetus crowd. I really don’t think he wants to start WW3.

      Like

      • mendo says:

        Yeah, I agree that that’s why he’s doing it.

        And because Bill Kristol asked what Trump ever did for Israel.

        Like

    • oink says:

      Comfort phase, non, sounding all statesmanly and stuff, while The Cunt is self immolating on the BLM altar?

      Watch next for the hacer las paces with the Hispanics.

      Like

      • oink says:

        with dems kowtowing to the BLM faction of the black electorate, this opens a barn door for “constructive conversations” with the spiks.

        Like

  34. Publius says:

    Like

  35. Tam the Bam says:

    Like

  36. plumpjack says:

    “If the Founding Fathers had lived in the 21st century, they would think Washington was the greatest tyranny since Babylon. If Union soldiers knew they were fighting so that the great industrial cities of the North could become colonies of Africa, Latin America, and Judaea they would have stayed home. If the men who landed in Normandy knew they were fighting to end White rule over the United States as the terminus of global decolonization, they’d have defected to Germany. Whatever it was, the United States is no longer.”

    https://atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/2016/07/12/americas-consensus-pronounced-dead/

    Like

  37. Captain Obvious says:

    These Two Hormones Divide Winners From Losers http://observer.com/2016/07/these-two-hormones-separate-winners-from-losers/

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Winning is biological, even hormonal. Dozens of researchers have studied the biological effects of what actually happens to people when they win—tennis players who beat their opponents, chess masters who checkmate their rivals and traders who outwit the markets. Spoiler alert: It’s testosterone—the hormone with a reputation for turning sweet young boys into hairy-chested, pugilistic, sex-crazed macho men. But there’s much more to testosterone than that.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Just as there is biology to winning there is biology to losing. Call it the “loser effect.” Not only did Altucher’s testosterone likely drop, robbing him of confidence, motivation and energy, but another hormone kicked in—cortisol. A spike in cortisol has nearly the opposite effect of testosterone, turning people into stressed-out irrational pessimists who panic and quit. Altucher recounts plummeting into an extended free fall, losing all interest in sex and hiding in his room as he nearly went broke.

        Like

  38. walawala says:

    Since I upped my game the age of girls I’m banging now is in the mid to late 20’s. These girls are up for exploring. There’s no talk of “long term” yet….one is constantly trying to pin me down. The other night she was upset that I hadn’t added her as a friend on Facebook. Yes…girls under 30 care about these things.

    My jerkboy response was: “What? And make it easier to spy on me? Nahhhh”

    These girls openly tell me how they see boys…yes “boys” their age as sexless or lacking in any sort of well…game. They don’t use the word “game” but it’s clear.

    I’ve also tried an experiment. I go for the strong IOI’s and then don’t act interested or escalate. The sexual tension disappears very quickly. I can get it going again, but it usually is on another day and I have to start from scratch.

    The fact remains with a Red Pill view of life you can pretty much accurately predict how things will unfold and what level of investment you need to make to get the bang.

    At the point now where I prefer to have 2 or 3 regulars than constantly pipelining new ones. But I still do it to calibrate my game. In almost every situation girls want a jerkboy. In some cases they just want the solid, quiet, smart type who tells them what to do. The trick in game is to know which situation requires which type of game.

    Like

  39. Sentient says:

    Ginsburg walking back her statements and now the NYBT acknowledging Hillary tied with Trump….

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-poll.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

    LOL – just in time for the GOP convention… b bbbut but Trump CAN’T win? Right????

    Like

    • Corvo says:

      Their fear is palpable. Phony “Jane Doe” child abuse lawsuits; KKK; Black Lies riots and beaner fiestas; La Raza-Tat-Taza judges; stars of David; trannies in little girls’ bathrooms; forced integration of federally-funded dindu zoos inside White neighborhoods; Ramadan bomb-a-thons . . . they’re throwing everything they have but they still can’t stump the Trump.

      I’m reminded of that scene from the film “Mars Attacks” when the government attacks the Martians with nuclear weapons as a last resort:

      Like

    • plumpjack says:

      a scotus backtracking on their words is the equivalent of admitting judicial incompetence.

      you regret it? oh really? any court decisions you want to reconsider while you’re at it?

      Like

    • Glengarry says:

      She tried to stump the Trump.

      Like

  40. Sorcerygod says:

    I think I understand haters now. (re: the posters who mocked me after my inserts).

    Yes, I think I understand haters.

    Ordinary people do not believe extraordinary people can exist.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    Like

    • plumpjack says:

      yes, sorceryfag, you nailed it. we all hate you because you’re extraordinary. extraordinarily dumb.

      now fucking get lost.

      Like

      • Sorcerygod says:

        I feel as if I’m failing if I don’t have everyone on board with me.

        Tell me why you’re so angry and negative toward me. Give me a window into the light that is working in your mind.

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        “I feel as if I’m failing if I don’t have everyone on board with me.”

        I feel that you have a lot of experience with this feeling…

        Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Like

      • Sorcerygod says:

        I leaned forward laughing uncontrollably at this. It seriously is the most flattering thing anyone has ever done for me, even more than the chick in the park who said I looked like a god. This pleases me. Thank you, Captain Obvious!

        Like

    • Corvo says:

      Believe me, SemiticG-d . . . we all know you’re one of the extraordinary “chosen” people.

      Like

      • Marc says:

        SG’s use of “the female gender” above, when the normal word is “sex,” is a Frankfurt School tell. (((It’s))) like Rachael Rosen — close but no cigar, but good enough for government work.
        Go tell Director Tamir wossizname there’s a glitch in the software … and hugs to Barry …

        Like

      • Sorcerygod says:

        Oy vey, it’s not kosher to talk about my uncircumcised dick like that.

        Makes me verklempt.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Marc sussed it out… this clown talks like a precocious middle-schooler… which is always the Big Yenta Tell.

        We’re not truly mad at you, bubeleh… it’s just that our necks be so sore from (((shakin’ our haids))).

        Go earn your after-school shekels elsewhere… you’re not very good at the task at hand… especially in these environs, the hallowed chateau.

        Like

      • PA says:

        My impression: teenager and possibly bipolar on a manic episode. I banned him on my blog for aggressive wierdness.

        Like

    • driveallnight says:

      “faggotrygod”

      Like

  41. olivermaerk says:

    Judge them and judge them hard! That is the only way they understand and it is what they really need. Everything else is bs.

    From: http://freedompowerandwealth.com

    Like

  42. Publius says:

    Lolzozozoz For Whites Sensing Decline, Donald Trump Unleashes Words of Resistance – NYTimes.com – mobile.nytimes.com
    http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/14/us/politics/donald-trump-white-identity.html

    Like

  43. Libertardian says:

    https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/80917843/question-time

    ‘> Seriously, how do you intend to avoid the “Trump bullied a woman at the debates!” narrative?

    Trump fully intends to bully Hillary Clinton. Voters already think he’s a bully, there’s no avoiding it. Why fight it? Bully her even harder, then use it as evidence and confirmation bias that she is too weak and too incompetent to be president during these dangerous times.’

    Like

    • Sentient says:

      Yup… same answer to all these types of questions “How? Who fucking cares?”

      The battle lines are drawn, you will not get someone to thoughtfully consider Hillary over Trump or vice versa… sides have been chosen… now it’s about throwing down.

      RealPolitik comes to the US.

      Like

  44. Andrew says:

    A year ago I had a three week fling with one of the hottest and most sought after girls in my large office. I learned more about the true nature of women in those three weeks than in any other point in my life. 99% of them are completely devoid of what men would consider humanity.

    Like

  45. OT: This is outstanding, you gotta try it. Go to Google Translate, and translate Black Man to Welsh. 🙂

    Like

  46. Sentient says:

    So… Looks like Mike Pence will be Trump’s VP pick. Ok all things considered…

    Like

    • mendo says:

      MikePence none the richer.

      Eh, I’m not sold on the guy, but reading many comments about the pick, sounds like a Biden-esue, won’t rock the boat type.

      A way to shore up the cuck vote from the midwest. Look at PA’s US Emergent map on his blog. That’s why he chose him.

      That is, if it winds up being Pence. I’m penceive to think so.

      Like

  47. Roger that says:

    More facts come out on bogus St. Alston Sterling narrative. Police had to detain his pedophile ass under Pretty much same circumstances before.

    The hard facts support the hard right. As it was in the beginning, is now, and forever shall be…

    http://m.wafb.com/wafb/db_330682/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=gA7aGdVi

    Like

  48. Gil says:

    “. . . justifiably assuming that skanks who have taken it up the pooper on first dates might not have a properly functioning discretion filter.”

    Fixed it for you.

    Like

  49. Lichthof says:

    Check out Daryl Strawberry’s comments today.

    Like

Leave a Reply