Feed on
Posts
Comments

Remember that unfunnygirl who performed a social science experiment up to the rigorous standards set by academic feminists everywhere, an experiment in which her results were presented as evidence men don’t want casual sex any more than women want it? Femcunts rejoiced, because femcunts will rejoice at whatever slender reed of feels gives succor to their pretty lies.

Dr. Jeremy, from Psychology Today, responded, vindicating the original Clark and Hatfield study finding that men are fantastically more agreeable to the prospect of casual, NSA sex than are women.

The difference between actual social science research and these pseudo-experiments is that, with real research, there are experimental controls put in place to reduce bias and alternative explanations for the findings. For example, the original Clark and Hatfield (1989) study standardized what was said by the experimental assistants to ask for sex, so that each participant received exactly the same believable message. Specifically they said, “I have been noticing you around campus. I find you to be very attractive. Would you go to bed with me tonight?”

Additionally, Clark and Hatfield (1989) used multiple experimental assistants to control for differences in attractiveness. Also, the assistants were asked to only request sex from believable partners (college students, relatively the same age, and attractive to them). Finally, participants were approached during times when they were most likely to have free time for sex (weekdays and not between class periods).

We see none of these experimental controls in the pseudo-experiment video. The woman is inconsistent with her approach and how she asks for sex. Sometimes she is laughing, uncomfortable, and clearly not serious in her request. She also approaches many men who are not plausible sex partners for her, who are busy with their day, or who are otherwise unavailable for immediate sex.

Nevertheless, when she does approach men that she finds sexually attractive, who are plausible sex partners, who are available, and her request to them is more complementary and believable, then she more often gets a yes (for example, see video at 1:54 with guy in blue shirt). In fact, simply taking the men out of the analysis who are clearly considerably older than her (10), state they are too busy to go with her immediately (9), say they have a girlfriend and cannot have sex with her (12), or tell her they are gay (3), begins to increase her probability of getting a yes to sex (28/66 = 42%). If she only approached men that she actually found sexually attractive, used a standardized and believable request for sex, and hid the camera too, then it is quite possible that her rate of success would be even higher and better match those of actual studies that used such experimental controls. In fact, more recent experimental studies, following those controls and protocols, have indeed found similar results as the original Clark and Hatfield (1989) experiments (for more, see Hald & Høgh-Olesen, 2010).

Clark, R. D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 2(1), 39-54.

Hald, G. M., & Høgh-Olesen, H. (2010). Receptivity to sexual invitations from strangers of the opposite gender. Evolution and Human Behaviior, 31, 453-458.

Feminists — ah, fuck it, let’s just say all women — will never be convinced by logic or reason to accept that there are deep, abiding differences in the psychology of the sexes. Women are built by evolution to fool themselves as much as fool men to their true natures, because complete enlightenment and the pained introspection that would follow could sabotage the Darwinian prime directive to attract and monopolize the top alpha sperm and resources.

  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Bitcoin cash
  • Litecoin
  • Monero
Scan to Donate Bitcoin to 3C99iaxKpMgNq95sn6ZBHoy75Z4MfPiAo7

Donate BTC

Scan the QR code or copy the address below into your wallet to send btc.

Scan to Donate Ethereum to 0x5667AaC05953840FD2DDCdB5e6d1B3511caa858d

Donate BTC

Scan the QR code or copy the address below into your wallet to send btc.

Scan to Donate Bitcoin cash to qz9srlhlwmn5q8m4fa9fjx6ppwag7zd50cn7e25a4h

Donate BTC

Scan the QR code or copy the address below into your wallet to send btc.

Scan to Donate Litecoin to MWynJmvAfRx3fC8MaZatwhNyfJs3EmTKEC

Donate BTC

Scan the QR code or copy the address below into your wallet to send btc.

Scan to Donate Monero to 46pKgZYgk8iS7hZtr3T489JgDRcF6he2m2o3mUQ9hktbNqTKrmbyp8CQ4eyEEVrySQVX78sDEd4vdBMRhFq525bRHWqgggE

Donate BTC

Scan the QR code or copy the address below into your wallet to send btc.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: