Where pretty lies perish.
Apr 22nd, 2015 by CH
Pleasureshivvers draw copious blood in an entertaining thread titled “Shitlib-faces.png“. Do shitlibs — aka leftoids (the CH nomenclature crafted to draw attention to the essential anti-human ideology of SJWs) — have a distinguishing “look”? Why, yes, they do.
It’s physiognomies all the way down.
I leave it as an exercise for the reader to find the shitlibbiest face of all time. Here’s my contribution:
I think I just lost five years worth of boners.
True, I've wondered about that as well. The technique evident in this 13th Century illustration is comically juvenile. Why was so much Medieval art so bad?
Turns out there are many answers to that question.
One, most Medievel Europeans were simply bad artists, just like most people today are bad artists. A lot of the lowbrow and middlebrow graphic illustrations drawn back then were done by random joes, who felt the spirit, but not the painter's brush, move them. There were talented Medieval painters but their works were less common and usually hanging in some rich aristocrat's castle.
Two, the rules of perspective didn't get formally established until the early 15th Century in Italy. Untrained amateur painters and illustrators before that time would not have been acquainted with proper rendering techniques.
Three, there is a lot of great Medieval art, but it was usually found in decorative works like book bindings or music boxes, not so much in painting.
Four, it is possible that Europeans lost a lot of Greco-Roman realistic painting techniques after the fall of Rome.
Five, there is a theory that Medieval Europeans held the belief that realistic paintings using perspective were "an affront to God", becaue it hubristically mimicked God's creation. This is a controversial theory, though, because realistic paintings were created during that time.
If they had MBA-credentialed management consultants in 1850, this house would never have been built to those specs.
"I'm sorry, but your shareholders would appreciate the labor and materiel efficiency savings"
Candy is dandy, but Kovyor is quicker.
MMA
(Mary Mother of Asskicking)
It isn't fascism.....yet.
(and the sooner it happens, the better)
From the forest you were born, to the forest you shall return.
There does appear to be a loose parallel between jewish and Quaker histories. Both groups were (rationally) discriminated against in many economic and cultural sectors. They responded to the discrimination by pouring into the occupational fields which were still open to them: banking and industry.
The wealth each group nepotistically accrued from those endeavors allowed them to more effectively subvert the surrounding society.
It's good to visualize the geographical origin of many of the groups we discuss. Geography and group attributes are strongly associated through the process of evolution.
The Quakers originate predominately from the English Highlands. Mountain people tend to be more clannish (ethnocentric) than lowland peoples, yet the Quakers very early on developed a pacifist ideology that seems to contradict accepted theories of ethnocentric group psychology research.
It is possible Quaker pacifism was a form of group fitness behavior, by way of virtue signaling harmlessness and victimhood that would allow their group to more easily take advantage of host societies.
The Quaker Question.
I link this video for discussion purposes. We have a Jewish Problem. Do we also have to grapple with a Quaker Question? QQanon?
I'm open to this theory, primarily because I believe it would have been very difficult for jews to subvert Hajnal White nations as thoroughly as they have without some help "from the inside".
"H1B abusers"
This rhetoric is damning of Trump's real intentions. The crisis facing us isn't the problem of "abusers" of the system. The crisis is the system ITSELF.
We should be going after the H1B program in its entirety, not just the abusers of it.
Same with immivasion. We should be deporting all of them, not just the "violent criminals".
The System must be repealed.
Sickness of the west. Used to be the normative template would have kept them in check or exiled.
you mean the heteropatriarchal cisgendernormative template
As a genXer, I used to thank god we didn’t have to go fight in some stupid war, and I heaved a sigh of relief when I didn’t have to worry about being nuked by the Soviets any more.
But good god. Ironic that the West defeating all its enemies was what doomed it.
You never defeated me; I got the title, the belt and Im pretty as a girl…I must be the greatest, I showed all you suckas…
Ironic that the West defeating all its enemies was what doomed it.
—————————————————————————————
You didn’t defeat anything. Just like Foreman you defeated yourself by falling for the rope-a-dope, punching yourself out, chasing yellow men thru the jungles of SE Asia; using a $900,000 missiles to kill bearded brown men with a rusty AKs…
Not to mention those billion dollar fake moon rocks you fell for.
(((shakin my head)))
What doomed the west was mofos like you getting high on their own supply of lies, deception and falsehood.
What doomed the west was mofos like you getting high on their own supply of lies, deception and falsehood.
Like “All Men Are Created Equal”…
… and the modern day equivalent “Race Is A Social Construct”.
That said… it may be like trying to catch a cuckoo in the forest, getting YT to tell the truth… but getting you darkies to tell the truth would be like trying to catch the echo of the cuckoo’s call.
Seriously… never knew a n1663r to come clean, even when caught in flagrante delicto.
The West is only as doomed as its leaders, and barring them, its principled dissenters, allow it to be. In other words, we can undoom ourselves. Can’t say that for people who will undergo a 90% die off at the pull of the welfare plug.
You make a good point Eliot, thank you.
Its the main reason the white man should close up shop and get out of the lying business altogether.
FOREVER.
Just look at yourself?
“You people” have refined the art of lying to the point even your own children are confused. Admit it Eliot, the truth is too black and too strong for you to handle, thats why they gotta come to me.
You sell that lame white popsicle nonsense while I hand out straight up doses of black, ugly truth; and you wonder why your son got my jersey?
I admit you got a lot of heart, but you won’t never get no fans peddling moon rocks, white puffery, and TOM fuckery like you do. Todays youth don’t wanna see another goddamn john wayne movie. They want the truth, the black ugly truth and you can’t handle that.
You could be a badass but you you be weak.
You should retire before you get hurt out here.
Nicole, is that you?
James Blonde,
Stop with the Eldridge Cleaver delusional nonsense. The future is not black. It is either yellow (most likely imo) or J-ish. Neither of whom hold any chivalrous notions of equality or fairness. You people don’t know which side your bread is buttered on; you better get down on your knees and pray to God that Y-T snaps out of it and gets back on his feet cause if not, well, you’re up shit creek without a paddle.
I’m coming to understand that r-selected peoples can’t be persuaded with appeals to the future or the well-being of their people. Nationalism is a K-selected ideology. Appeals to it fall on uncomprehending ears.
The r-selected are motivated almost solely by their immediate appetites and by any prospect of harming their perceived betters.
Yep. Their only evolutionary incentive was to dump their seed in any sow within reach and kill any other male they encountered. Coincidentally I was just watching Rise of the Planet of the Apes last night and was reminded of this when Cesar, the smart ape, used the concept of Fascia to explain to another ape the importance of unity in the face of a common enemy, “Alone ape weak, together ape strong”. The other ape looks down and sees the chimps flinging poo and muhdikking and replies “Ape stupid”.
China is bound to be getting antsy about the ever growing cloud of radiation in the Pacific from the Daiichi meltdown. They already have the retarded Africans convinced that they are their friends, and have a foothold on that continent. Doesn’t take a genius to figure out what comes next.
T-h-w-a-c-k, you’re making my point for me about who does the most lying.
Not only is the way you declare victories that haven’t been achieved unseemly, it’s farcical.
Your so-called “black, ugly truth” may be black and ugly, but it ain’t the troof.
And nobody’s wearing your jersey… leastwise not at Schloss Eliot.
Your kind are riding high right now, but pride comes before a fall, as both Scripture and history teach us.
So enjoy it while it lasts… if that’s the side you want to champion.
My God, however, says that ten thousand may fall to our left and another ten thousand to our right… but my kind will walk tall through it all and see the New World.
That’d be the one
this face is in the dictionary under shitlib imo..
[img]http://www.theoculusonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/100409chris-gethard1.jpg[/img]
KEVIN CONBOY FROM COLORADO
[…] The Shitlib Face […]
There is no “shitlib” face. The phenomenon being described is how a person’s appearance can change materially in one’s mind once the observer gets a glance at that person’s soul.
Beauty is not in the eye of the beholder, but a person’s appearance arrives as a composite in our minds. It is easily proven by looking at the same stranger in different contexts, such as kneeling before an altar in solemn prayer or kneeling before ten guys in a bukkake circle.
This truth about human beauty is denied around here, where the reigning dogma insists a woman’s attractiveness is 97% physical.
MK
Beauty is not in the eye of the beholder, but a person’s appearance arrives as a composite in our minds. It is easily proven by looking at the same stranger in different contexts, such as kneeling before an altar in solemn prayer or kneeling before ten guys in a bukkake circle.
Word. And each of yours is a mitzvah, if I may borrow a frontrunner term. 😉
Alas, I believe there are more than several around these parts who would rather view the latter scene and regale how “haaawwwwt” the subject was, whilst likewise making a schadenfreude repast in deriding her lax morality…
… all the while unaware of the irony, to boot.
where the reigning dogma insists a woman’s attractiveness is 97% physical.
It isn’t?
lzoozolzolzo
lzozozolzolzo
+1
There are two types of people: feminists and those that love women.
Well played. That one should go on a bumper sticker.
There are two types of people: men and women.
There are people and subhuman hominids.
Feminism is the most sexist ideology there is. It denigrates femininity so totally that women must become masculine in order to demonstrate any worth in their eyes.
The sexes are equal. The plug is equal to the socket, both are equally necessary to complete an electrical circuit. Feminism has made women unequal by insisting they excel at manliness.
MK
Good points, I’ve thought that myself
holy shitlib i didn’t need this this morning
i am especially triggered by the thoughtful male shitlib style
http://isak.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c627153ef016762388967970b-pi
Game over, we have a winner… thanks for playing, folks.
So that’s what happened to Rosemary’s baby. . .
Poor Joyce Carol Oates. Hit by the ugly stick, etc. Painfully introverted too.
Hall & Oates looks better than she does.
Chris Hayes from MSNBC.
If I were sketching a character for a work of fiction named the The Spirit Within, I’d use a Chris Hayes photo as a visual aide to guide the process.
The merchant within is going to be so excited when he sees you giving him recognition.
Well, then I have to give him props as well… when I saw “Shitlib Face”, StraponWithin was the immediate thought reference.
“Hand up, don’t breed.”
LOL
Living rent-free in yer heads. Love it.
BTW, I’m a lot better looking than that guy. But I know you’ll never believe it.
Who gives a shit, even if we did believe you. The fragility of your self esteem is made evident every time you peacock over these boards with nonsense like “I’m 6’4″ and “I’m better looking than”.
No one cares about your height or looks unless you own a pussy. Fuck dude. You’re a woman in psychology.
Fag.
PS: You’re predictable so I’ll parry in advance your limp response.
****
Because I poke fun at fat girls sometimes does not mean I secretly desire them.
So a man can’t defend himself, in your world. Understood, hater. (pats P on head)
Your “toes curl” at the very thought of confrontation. You know nothing of self defense. Your security mechanism is one of appropriated and clumsily applied womanish postures of aggression.
You are an ASCII tranny.
The troll is strong within you, young Padawan.
I wouldn’t crow too much about that rent-free living in our haids… the space you occupy therein is the equivalent of the corner of the schoolroom where the dunces sit in shame.
I’m sure you’ll use THAT one too, in a future post. lzozlzozlzozlzozlzolzozlozl
I notice a lot of these ‘white’ people have brown eyes. What’s the deal with that?
Is the saying ‘You’re so full of shit your eyes are brown’ actually true?
Eskimo ancestry.
Bingo
There have been white people with brown eyes for centuries. Heck, it’s the most common eye color in the world, I think. Nothing sinister about that.
Brown eyes provide greater visual acuity. The melanocytes in the iris prevent “light leakage” which facilitates tight focus; and the interior of the eyes use it for motor control.
Inability to produce melanin is why many albinos are legally blind.
Brown eyes are also why Larry Bird was such a bad ass but you be weak.
This creature of Dr. Moreau, like Nicole, seethes with impotent hate and expresses it with street preacher muh dik barnyard naturalism.
Brown eyes are also why Larry Bird was such a bad ass…
If I’m not mistaken, Larry Bird has blue eyes.
(((scratchin’ mah haid)))
@Ardalain My point being, it’s not the Eye-talians trying to be the arbiters of goodthink nowadays.
I have brownish green eyes, whatchu tryna say boy
Ohhhhh, for joy!
Yentas don’t count… it wouldn’t be fair to the rest of the competition.
We Takbir now
These guys are playing basketball, bringing the ball up court. . .
[…] The Shitlib Face […]
Is it the glasses? It’s always the glasses with these wannabe intellectuals. Mandatory Lasik in my regime!
http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/united-atheists-of-awesome/images/d/db/Troskey.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20130217183303
This is going to create quite the picture gallery. Let’s see which shitlib has the highest mode.
Two parallel genetic strains — Jewish and Puritan? That would explain American SJWs.
Thinking about the couple of Slavic hardcore libs I’ve know, they have tbeir own common look: a particular confluence of thin, introverted, intelligent, angry. Maybe in their case it’s simply the case of what Vox Day calls a gamma male — what I diagnose as alpha ambition without the alpha strength to fulfill this ambition.
I agree. They all seem to have a certain similarity in facial structure.
It may have something to do with medieval money-lenders weaseling their way into the bloodlines of some upper-class English before they were given the boot.
Alas, some of their daughters were fair… think Liz Taylor in Ivanhoe.
Yep. I guess with all that gold they were able to buy the very best perfume to mask the Foeteur Judaicus.
Ya think?
“It may have something to do with medieval money-lenders weaseling their way into the bloodlines of some upper-class English before they were given the boot.”
Fuck yes!! Right on the mark!
Great books for men on gamma males:
Caesar: “Let me have men about me that are fat,
Sleek-headed men and such as sleep a-nights.
Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look,
He thinks too much; such men are dangerous.”
(From W. Shakespeare, “Julius Caesar”)
Could you give an example of someone well known who you would say is a Gamma? (Srs question, no snark) I’m interested in the theory of most liberals falling in this category. It seems to me that most liberals, absent the ringleaders, would fall under what you would call Delta, ie. meek, unassuming, not wanting to go against the grain.
Wil Wheaton.
“Will Wheaton”
That’s funny. Just had to look him up and it seems like he wrote his own Wikipedia.
A delta is a normal man who understands who he is and his limitations. Mid-to lower smv will sleep with him. Alphas and betas respect him. He’s generally a weak leader.
A gamma below a delta in smv, but has higher ambitions without the ability to realize them. He’s delusional about his position on the sociosexual hierarchy. He’s scheming and passive aggressive because he lacks the ability to be aggressive. Other men do not respect him. Women despise a gamma but will fuck him if he’s situationally alpha (on the CH scale). A tyrant when in positionof power, unlike alphas or betas, who can lead.
I’ll try to think of some famous gammas. Probably lots of men in politics. Usually the weasly arrogant jealous backstabber in movies.
It seems to me lile alot of PUAs are natural Gammas in that they are unwilling to accept anything less than being Alpha, and are willing to use every trick in the book to make it happen. For example Mystery. I know alot of people here look up to him, but I’ve seen some of his videos and he gave off a real bitter, creep vibe to me.
Most (ostensibly) straight white male leftists, especially SJWs, are Gammas. So are most politicians (of either party) nowadays.
I think a big part of the reason why there is such an abundance of Gammas among my generation (Gen Y) is the anti-bullying campaigns and legislation. Bullying and hazing, despite what the left would have us believe, is an indispensible part of a young man’s education; it introduces him to the concept of the pecking order, his place in it, and the consequences for breaking the rules.
Beta fag: “Let me have girls about me that are fat,/ice-cream-eating girls and such as sleep with low value guys./Yond Cathy has a lean and sexy look/She thinks too much of her SMV;such gals are dangerous to my pud.”
Agreed. there is a big difference between control and leadership and some people, particularly lesser’s, do not understand that. If you want to go beyond your comfort zone, sometimes you just have to fake it
Daniel Plainview — revolutionary in a time of universal deceit.
+1000
PA, funny observation, it took me a few years but i finally figured out what the shitlibbiest towns where I used to live (northern and central NJ) had in common: a puritan 3.0 “church” (united church of Christ, ethical people society, Unitard-ian / universalist) AND a synagogue
Where lies and stupidity doth kiss….
Yup, Xavier, that’ll certainly do it. And out West, add a few weed shops and tattoo parlor a.
“what I diagnose as alpha ambition without the alpha strength to fulfill this ambition.”
Very nice. Yeah, men with the look are strangely feminized and women with the look are strangely masculinized. I say strangely because it’s not like a “pretty” twink type that could pass for a chick in the right light. They have parts of big wild alpha features mixed with small neotenous features.
Jutting wild jaw mixed with small face
Small baby jaw and swallowed chin mixed with large head
It’s like nature couldn’t make it’s mind up.
Ouch. One chubby chipper after another..
Love these people who know what feminism means. Have a hundred of self described feminist debate say, the proper role of women in regards the sex industry and then tell me what it means. Speaking of Lip, that little twerp, what just puckered him up in the photo? Can’t be too choosy I guess.
There was a post here about Breivik sparing one teenage boy because he had a nationalist’s face.
Keith Shitliberman
The platonic ideal of the Shitlib face is definitely Alex Pareene.
https://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/alex121108.jpg?w=200&h=189&crop=1
A shitlib tell: will pose for a portrait photo with hand on chin for the “thoughtful” look. A more virulent type will also have a sneering, rather than pensive expression.
Hugo SJWyzer
Nah, in reality he’s a dark triad manipulative playa … try again.
It seems you haven’t heard about his meltdown on Twatter a year or two ago.
No matter what the guy says, I wouldn’t believe him, period. Curious: What did he twat on the twatter?
Since he admits having had a penis inside him, no. Also, he leveraged his position as professor for what we’re all sure is bar well coed pussy in exchange for grades (he leaves that part out), so try again.
It was August 2013. Let’s just say, he went to confession publicly. It’s hilarious. Google search it.
“I hear you like foreheads so I put a forehead on your forehead!”
Some will say Maddow because of the third sex look (shared by most of them) but she looks remarkably like young Ted McGinley in many photos, who is not shitlib looking.
Oh, this one hurts:
I lol’ed.
“Do you even feminist, bro?”
If a pic’s worth a thousand words, this one’s War & Peace.
More like the face than launched a thousand lunches.
is that Jackie?
“men without chests”
Cute. He looks just like his granny.
Ooo …and it’s a skeptic too. Doublepoonmagnet.
That’s pretty much what we expected.
Todd! Todd – What are you doing downstairs – You’re not trying on my panties again – are you? Wash your hands and get ready for supper!
Oh look, little pins on all the places he and his “life partner” have visited.
Should be a submission to :men who look like old lesbians “.
That is indeed what a male feminist looks like. Actually that guy is only mildly effeminate compared to most of them.
Joooze! Joooze everywhere! BTW they have the same looks as almost every prominent top dog in early soviet and soviet-satellite regimes had. Moar joooze!
Mommy, it stings!
gay doesn’t count.
Thumbs up bro!
One Gamma tendency: the quote, “If that’s not gay, it’ll do until gay gets here” often applies.
I dunno, I think the pic of the gal with the glasses that says “triggered” could be just another hot librarian… who’s glad to see me.
You wouldn’t think that if you really knew the story behind the image. She was the feminist claiming twitter gave her PTSD. On the other hand, it might be a good thing you didn’t know about it either.
Yeah, I didn’t know any backstory to “triggered”… and I studiously avoid twitter and such.
She reminds me a bit of Sarah Palin.
GE, she looks more like she’s got you trapped and you’re about to suffer. (That film Audition ring a bell?) That’s a Thousand Cock stare merged with a Hillary smirk. Eesh!
Upon close speculation, I believe you’ve nailed it.
My erstwhile Angela Merkel tumescence has, at least, now be alleviated.
>Audution
*grabs wire*
Once you see the pics I’ve uploaded of her. You are going to take back any compliments of that lady and hang your head in shame.
I’m already sorry.
LOL
Or she could be someone who’d tell a whole audience of people you never paid child support and then later retract that and admit you had given over 100K.
This place is becoming troll haven. What the fk is going on?
Wait, is the “triggered” pic just the guy from the first pic with make-up?
Here’s the original, after feeling slighted by the “so easy a caveman can do it” stereotype:
I’ll have the roast duck with the mango salsa.
Heh, heh…
“I seem to have lost my appetite.” … and then The Look.
Someone at our office looks like this joker. The hair, glasses, the smirk.
The Germans call it Backpfeifengesicht: a face that needs to get punched.
Yes! Best German word!
Stop quoting Cracked. They’re wrong. It’s “slapped”.
Also, as Vox said, there is absolutely no doubt he has an iPhone.
It’s “iPhag” since Timmi Cook took over.
I say we leave YKW out of this contest… no sport in shooting fish in a barrel…
… and besides, I’m looking forward to a nice dinner tonight, so don’t put me off my feed.
You’re just jealous of that sweet, Ashkenazi IQ.
And those big schwanzenstücke. :duckface
Creates something out of their imagination. Manipulates system for their own ends. Gets smug look for thinking they are almighty.
How did this guy not get posted yet?
https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRTSD9U7LDiCMMvTG-HuAQeOzG56PFLcZsvJo4cx0v_LGFGL1OneA
Famous gay liberal commentators don’t count. Find real-life examples.
I don’t think I want to put in that much effort.
I posted a Chris Hayes, that was either blocked or shitcanned by CH.
In other news, the 0b@mbi administration has designated Utah, Texas and Ohio as “hostile red states” for the upcoming Jade Helm domestic military “training exercise” coming to a city near you this summer.
Stay tuned folks, this could get interesting.
The conspiracy of the inferior.
Tricky. Not even feminists know what feminism means.
and for all the claims of “women are more verbal” it’s hilarious that all those words don’t mean a thing, or mean two things, or mean one thing one day and something else the next.
best to stick with kino and escalation as there is nothing to misinterpret.
Chinless wonders
I think it’s more like they have those child molester smirky big lips
there’s actually a name for it…pedosmile.
http://www.science20.com/selective_genetics/pedosmile_do_pedophiles_have_certain_smile-82713
along the same lines as what Captain Obvious says about darkness showing up in a person’s appearance.
i do think people have traits that, if we are really paying attention, will cue us in to their personalities and defects. slut eyes, slut face, shitlib face, etc.
people can deny it and say it’s all foolish stereotyping but, we all experience it every day instinctually. when we look at someone and can’t put our finger on it but we just get a “feeling” that something is off about them, we are actually observing subtle clues that help us to assess all the positive and negative attributes of a person so we can decide whether or not to get involved with them.
Bug eyes, hook nose, weak chin, NO EARLOBES, sloping forehead. These are the shitlib indicators.
yes, and we spot those markers subconsciously. within milliseconds.
Good point 88 – the inner state can manifest at the surface. I’m generally loathe to judge a book by its cover, as people can surprise you. And an ‘innocent’ look on females is particularly beguiling and most deceptive. BUT some are better at reading the signs and therefore make better appraisals. In a culture that is already superficial, there’s a propensity for looks judgement to become absolute materialism – a core tenet of Marxism. The very fact that these people are posing for photos at all, would be seen as vanity and degeneracy by our forebears. Who were, of course, absolutely right.
Sitting around judging photos wouldn’t exactly make our ancestors glow with pride either. Quite the opposite, they’d probably be disgusted at the pettiness of it all.
Sitting around judging photos wouldn’t exactly make our ancestors glow with pride either
I wouldn’t go that far. Our ancestors weren’t all grit and struggle. They did levity and frivolity too.
I agree, and it’s a good point not to raise them up too high on a nostalgic pedestal. But they did clearly state that photos steal a person’s soul, yet their claim was dismissed as preposterous by those who knew better. 100 years later and, lo and behold, the world is teeming with hordes of vapid superficials, whose moral fibre has been keelhauled by all the self-glorification through the technology they feared. Their levity and frivolity would probably be seen as profound in these days of trending ephemerals. (and there they are, right back up on that pedestal)
HT, what an outstanding observation. Almost as though our ancestors, in their mistrust of photography, were already anticipating the rise of Histrionic Personality Disorder and scr0tial media and the thousand c0ck stare and the p0rnification of everything.
Our ancestors were notorious lampooners. Few punches were pulled, and many paunches were punched.
For one example, if you think modern politics is a circus, you should check out some of the papers in re elections from the 19th century… they make our current MSM seem downright genteel.
88, I spend so much time now wondering about this shiznat – whether I can detect in a white [non-j00-ish] face any signs of the ancient heresies, like jesuitism or quakerism or unitardianism or abolitionism, which might have given rise to modern white [non-j00-ish] sh!tlibtarderal insanity. It’s like a dermatological phrenology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrenology
The dog takes him out for a walk.
That one gets my vote.
The dog does look to be in charge there.
It actually looks kind of… embarrassed.
HAHA…it does look embarrassed.
That dog doesn’t bark… it sighs.
+1 Presenting the revised winner, hands down. Feeling nauseous. There is a shitlib face: the pride of overwhelming domestication. I don’t think non-practitioners of PUA will see it.
Wow buddy.These freaks need to be put back in the dark corners they crawled out of.
How any person can read or buy his books is beyond my ken.
poor guy (the dog)
GB4 the win
I remember that burn. Made the SJW bitching rounds.
Is there something about the color green and feminism? The other bloke up above was also in a green shirt.
@mendozatorres Of course: 1) potheads, and 2) environuts.
Clearly the pic of Jon Scalzi in a dress
Ahh, that’s more like it…
and no tats…
Something tells me she likes it up the ass
The second pic..wow..I can already hear Chris Hansen telling me to take a seat.
Men do have some choice in the matter. I blame both women and men for the sexual immorality in the world (which includes you people of course).
Why, Matt dearie… are you trying to say “it takes two to tango”?
Thanks for bringing that to our attention, toots. :duckface
And fer cryin’ out loud, will you start using a chick name and stop trying to pass off as a dude? 😡
Matthew has plenty of awareness on the issue…I’m curious how much self-awareness he has.
@nothingman00 yeah, I can’t look at that picture very long without getting w00d.
Looks like Meg from Family Guy. . . .”Shut up, Meg!”
Hahahaha thats gold
Yeah frog lips – My hard on stops when you turn to look at me
There’s a Backpfeiffengesicht right there.
According to the Derb, the Chinese descriptor for this phenomenon was “Class Struggle Face”
I rather like that phrase.
Cultural Revolution China was a vortex of insanity. Even by communist standards.
Via a nearby blog
http://www.statepress.com/article/2015/04/asu-army-rotc-members-run-in-heels-to-support-sexual-assault-awareness-month
OK, that will never make it past the spam filter. But you just feel like saluting when they march past, don’t you?
Free my comment you dicks
Soft features for soft people.
I had to add this one as well.
That’s omega, not gamma.
No selfies, now.
Pfahahahahahahahahahaha
Looks like a delta. Amiable and conflict-averse.
(Low Delta. A regular Delta is a normal guy)
Vegetable Lasagna?! You never had a chance. . .
Is that a man or a woman? Humans are naturally repulsed by those whose sex/gender they can’t easily ascertain (and attracted to / envious of the hypermasculine or hyperfeminine).
You’re not the first to notice the liberal face:
http://phillips.blogs.com/goc/2010/07/sand-lover.html
http://phillips.blogs.com/goc/2010/10/stereotype.html
I was all set to go sarging tonight, even though I’m in fucking Ohio on a consulting thing.
After viewing this thread, I think I’m just going to chug down the cheapest booze possible and hope I get 30 days in a drunk tank.
Libido. Gone.
Father John Misty aka J. Tillman.
Greatest male vocalist of his generation… but… just look at that face.
Oh yes, t-h-w-a-c-k,
Cassius Clay
Massa’s favourite’s house phony rebel POS, loudmouth house servant. A good first step in seeing the mainstream BS for what it is. Oh, the memories …
Funny a zhyd-posing-as-negro should pump up that loser.
oink
Look who’s talkin; you don’t even have a slave name, let alone a real name.
If I saw you in person I’d make you punch yourself with your own baby fist.
It would be like high school all over again.
Don’t ya zhyds usualy get some goy (Schicklgruber, Pilate) to do your dirty deeds for ya’ll?
These are the fruits of so many single mothers.
And all of them spoiled rotten.
Tell me that US Army wanna be soldiers aren’t beta again?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/21/army-rotc-program-allegedly-pushed-men-wear-high-h/
http://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/image/2015/04/21/Temple_ROTC_c0-0-700-408_s561x327.jpg?
“This is Nick…”
Holy shit is this bizarre. A queer who experienced his first surge of T for the firs time in 15 years and a chick so crazy she’s one hour away from involuntary commitment
http://cdnbakmi.kaltura.com/p/1679921/sp/167992100/thumbnail/entry_id/0_hltkuia1/version/100002/acv/182/height/480
A bit OT but have you heard of the latest SJW crisis? Seems David Letterman made a joke while warming up his audience. After a college guy asked his advice to new grads,he replied,”Treat a lady like a whore and a whore like a lady.” (Looks like he reads CH) The joke no doubt got a big laugh as it is a funny line,esp. from Letterman. Now the cunts are having a shit fit,finding people off the street who are troubled.”We live,” says one dumb ass,”in a society that objectifies women!” Basically guys with daughters are scared because feminism has ruined womens morality. So they cry “feminism” in hopes of shaming the cads. But feminism is what brought this on in the first place…not easy to be a dad of girls.
Would not happen to a more deserving person…
His Faux edginess … Like real dissent would be tolerated in MSM
Ps very easy to be dad of girls – be dad, not friend pal, chum, or beta orbiter.
Oink
Hey faggot, whats with this “oink” crap you keep doing?
Is that supposed to be some kind of Faux edginess?
And who the fuck capitalizes anonymous as if its meaningful?
You should find a real name like Lesion.
I think you mean ‘legion’, dumbass.
I don’t remember asking you a goddamn thing.
Now go fuck yourself; or whatever it is you do to stay so fat, pink and soft.
I’ve got brains and brawn, although I appreciate you might struggle to grasp the concept.
What?
all you got is your blood on my shirt.
I’ll find your grave, dig up your bones and stomp on em.
So scare. Much fear.
As I mentioned on another thread, that line was from the broad who wrote Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, back in the 1940’s.
It’s been quoted numerous times by numerous people over the years. I can’t believe people are acting shocked, or hearing it for the first time in 2015.
David Letterman’s “edge” is duller than a 2-month-old razor these days. He looks like he escaped from the rest home. Late-nite comedy sucks anyway, and I’m no Colbert fan, but it’s time to get this codger off the airwaves.
I think it’s pretty shocking that Letterman could be broadcasting from downtown JYC and fornicating with his interns and being chased by crazy stalker chicks and NOT be aware of fem!naz!!sm. It’s consistent with Mario’s observation below here, that you generally have to go all the way back to dudes born in the 1950s to get guys who aren’t petrified of this sh!znat.
Punch.
Re: the linked 2008 article: most people are not good looking. And Average looking does not mean “looks like the average person”. It means hes between good looking and ugly.
That study is absurd. And speaking from personal experience, most scumbags ive known, male and female, were between 6-8 on a scale. Male and female.
[ANSWER: SAUL ALINSKY]
[ANSWER: Frances Fox Piven]
[ANSWER: Peter Singer]
These people do what they do because there is way too much food, comfort, and safety.
We need to remove almost all of it.
Chaos is our friend.
Good point. I would add that these people also tend to think they had something to do with creating this safety and abundance, when they had nothing to do with it.
My favorite aspie character of all time.
Seconded…
Closely related is the comically grave, flexed retinas of “progressive holding a sign for social media” face. Michelle Obama’s ‘Bring Back Our Girls’ being the most notable. One day, a prog’s head will exploded with all of the emotional pyrotechnics going on inside while the face must remain stony.
Blue Russian’s quote nails it;
“Their faces attempt to look like they’re transcending to a higher realm of thought but all that shows in the empty neotenous eyes is a kind of creepy sterility.”
Remember when this was a game blog?
OM, Game is about being ahead of the curve. Perceiving meta-trends [trends of trends]. Knowing yourself, and knowing your enemy. Anticipating not the next move, or even the move after that, but movements deep into the future.
“I’m not crazy. I’m just ahead of the curve.”
Boo hoo.
Sadly, yes. Yes I do
I might sound a little like b!tch!n, but that sort of people totally took over the “intelectual” scene.
In my workplace – field of medicine – all full of low-T, hermaphrcd!tes, asexual apple fans, and manjaw , thick glasses “females”… and hcmcs ofc (them being actually most normal). 8/10 of my colleagues would fit in your pandemonium in top ranks. Remaining 2/10 are born in 1950s.
Moreover, sh!tl!bs cooperate between each other and do not let in anyone from outside. Two females each having 3 kids, were literally bullied out of the job. And surprise, no j3ws behind this, pure white SJW circus.
Dark age coming for your children, I tell you.
M, thanks for the field report. I now know a sh!tlib chick with a PhD who is an actual psychopath [all the other girls first alerted me to this]. And of course she hates my guts. But watching her torturing the little kids, and watching the other parents willingly bring their children to her for torturing, is a real eye-opener, as regards the unfolding and encroaching and enveloping Darkness.
ed miliband this is what a feminist looks like
Can’t post the pic but you get the idea
COULD YOU SPOT A POTENTIAL SCHOOL SHOOTER?
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/71382
Among the psychopathic category “at least 75 percent (nine out of twelve) had body issues. Many of these physical characteristics had a direct bearing on perceived manliness, including short stature, thin build, chest deformity, and fear of sterility” leading Langham to suggest a link between feeling weak or damaged and extreme narcissism…
To academic and employment problems, add romantic failures. “Most shooters either failed to establish any romantic or sexual relationships or else suffered breakups or rejections that contributed to their anguish and anger.”
Someone taught them to shoot.
Just sayin.
School Shooters: Understanding High School, College, and Adult Perpetrators
Kindle version costs $19.79.
A true man of the Church.
Damn image won’t post
http://mpcdot.com/forums/topic/8368-shitlib-facespng/
Hold up. Jon is missing his Jew-prescribed black horned rims.
http://www.dailystormer.com/operation-filthy-jew-bitch-a-national-action-solider-has-been-jailed-for-calling-a-jew-a-jew-and-we-must-resist/comment-page-1/
None of you have it right if you’re missing Team Jew Feminist Intellectual black horned rim glasses. These are now mandatory for leftists to proclaim themselves feminist intellectuals. Half of the leftoids wearing them need no prescription for their vision. It is purely part of their uniform.
Well, we know they’re stuck in the 1970s.
S.E Cupp? So hot…want to touch the hiney!
S.E. Cupp is not Jewish or feminist.
Alex Pareene has already been featured in the thread, but here he is in Übershitlib mode:
The common theme is the face’s resemblance to that of a groundhog.
Thank you, Carlos, but that is not me. Those are actors 🙂
Bernie Sanders…hahahaa