Is sociopathy prevalence on the rise in America? According to the author of the book The Sociopath Next Door, it is. American culture has become a breeding ground for sociopaths.
And disturbingly, the prevalence of sociopathy in the United States seems to be increasing. The 1991 Epidemiologic Catchment Area study, sponsored by the National Institute of Mental Health, reported that in the fifteen years preceding the study, the prevalence of antisocial personality disorder had nearly doubled among the young in America, It would be difficult, closing in on impossible, to explain such a dramatically rapid shift in terms of genetics or neurobiology.
Male sociopaths do better with women. This is indisputable. If sociopathy is increasing in America, then we must look to the foundational market of human interpersonal relations — the sexual market — to discover the source of this increasing sociopathy. Quite simply, if more women are more often rewarding sociopaths with their sex, then the supply of sociopathy will increase.
Under what conditions would women swoon for sociopaths? Very harsh conditions, for one. An emotionless Machiavellian is a useful mate to have when survival is constantly tested. Another social condition that probably redounds to the benefit of sociopaths is one in which women are incentivized, by a coddling state and by women’s own economic self-sufficiency, to favor the love of maximum tingle generating cads over comfy cozy betas.
Tellingly for the currently cratering US, diversity may play a crucial role in assisting the rise of the sociopaths.
In this opinion he is joined by theorists who propose that North American culture, which holds individualism as a central value, tends to foster the development of antisocial behavior, and also to disguise it. In other words, in America, the guiltless manipulation of other people “blends” with social expectations to a much greater degree than it would in China or other more group-centered societies.
I believe there is a shinier side of this coin, too, one that begs the question of why certain cultures seem to encourage prosocial behavior. So much against the odds, how is it that some societies have a positive impact on incipient sociopaths, who are born with an inability to process interpersonal emotions in the usual way? I would like to suggest that the overriding belief systems of certain cultures encourage born sociopaths to compensate cognitively for what they are missing emotionally. In contrast with our extreme emphasis on individualism and personal control, certain cultures, many in East Asia, dwell theologically on the interrelatedness of all living things.
Interestingly, this value is also the basis of conscience, which is an intervening sense of obligation rooted in a sense of connectedness. If an individual does not, or if neurologically he cannot, experience his connection to others in an emotional way, perhaps a culture that insists on connectedness as a matter of belief can instill a strictly cognitive understanding of interpersonal obligation.
An intellectual grasp of one’s duties to others is not the same attribute as the powerfully directive emotion we call conscience, but perhaps it is enough to extract prosocial behavior from at least some individuals who would have behaved only in antisocial ways had they been living in a society that emphasized individualism rather than interrelatedness. Though they lack an internal mechanism that tells them they are connected to others, the larger culture insists to them that they are so connected — as opposed to our culture, which informs them resoundingly that their ability to act guiltlessly on their own behalf is the ultimate advantage. This would explain why a Western family by itself cannot redeem a born sociopath. There are too many other voices in the larger society implying that his approach to the world is correct.
As Robert Putnam has discovered, ethnic and racial diversity reduces trust and social cohesion. Radically heterogeneous societies lose their aura of connectedness. Within this atomized, unraveled milieu, sociopaths thrive. They thrive not only because any communitarian brakes on their behavior are removed, but also because the culture begins to value and exalt the very special talents of the sociopath. This is an unavoidable transition when people feel unmoored from a larger social family, and adopt a pathologically individualist “look out for #1″ attitude to life in response to the vague but palpably ominous threat of rainbow fauxalitions.
To be a high level player, you have to be blessed with a touch of sociopathy. Without that trait for timely detachment, you will empathize too much with the particular needs and reproductive goals of women. That distracting emotional resonance will hinder your ability to hurt a woman’s feelings and, sadly you’ll discover, rare is the woman who joyfully surrenders her body to a man who is careful to spare her feelings.
So sociopathy has its privileges. But no nation of sociopaths ever put a man on the moon.
Kill your enemies and kill the pussy.
Killing is willing.
No other way to live.
“Killing is willing.” That perfectly expresses an idea I’ve been kicking around for a post. I might just have to use that one.
Go read another Conan fantasy, nerd.
“Sociopathy” is not deliberate indifference or disinterest, which implies command and control, which is what make women tingle.
(In its original meaning.)
The attractive man has command of his involvement/investment in any given social situation. The deliberate withdrawal of interest is an indicator of his ability to control both himself and his environs. Girls swoon for command presences. Sociopaths by definition have no control, as they entirely lack the ability to offer or withhold their investment and therefore have no means to master a social dynamic from top to bottom, from brain to womb.
The “mastery” in “amused mastery” means self-discipline. Sociopathy is mistaken by the woman as sangfroid/imperturbability/confidence insofar as the sociopath can conceal the emptiness that accompanies and essentially defines the disorder.
Again, “chicks dig sociopaths” is a callow assertion and lazy conclusion that leads frustrated omegas like JD to explode in geek rage when their dysfunction gets them “creep” cred rather than the promised “pussyslayer” rep, which is instigated in losers by CH irresponsibly.
Bob Wallace below has been all over this uniquely manospherian canard from the beginning, and he is correct.
Matt
So, Matthew King…. can you disclose this big list of sociopaths who got friendzoned their entire lives?
In a sense you are correct that women INCORRECTLY READ male sociopathy.
But I am not here to help women. I am here to use women.
Ya the ones who shoot up schools and/or movie theaters….
The very fact that you imagine sociopaths to be the toast of the social scene in direct contradiction to the DHM clinical definition of the disorder (“antisocial” and “dissocial”) tells me how slavishly devoted you are to the musings of amateur “manospherian” psychologists.
You should use a more accurate word, like “amoral” rather than sociopathic. You are idealizing a personality disorder which requires the lack of volition, a fundamental inability to maneuver willfully among people.
So, I’m not going to give you a list. Scray has just given you a hint where you might begin compiling one.
Rather, the burden of proof is on you to provide the names of even a handful of high-functioning clinical sociopaths who somehow successfully socialize despite their antisocial behavior. And preposterously fictional characters like Patrick Bateman do not count.
Matt
You need to read the world expert Dr. Robert Hare’s books on psychopathy as its obvious you don’t have even a slight understanding of what “antisocial” means in the psychopathic context. It does not mean that they avoid society or are bad in social situations but that they are destructive to society through their social interactions. In other words they love being around people and working the crowd with their sociopathic manipulation and charm skills.
You need to read the world expert Dr. Robert Hare’s books on psychopathy as its obvious you don’t have even a slight understanding of what “antisocial” means in the psychopathic context. It does not mean that they avoid society or are bad in social situations but that they are destructive to society through their social interactions. In other words they love being around people and working the crowd with their sociopathic manipulation and charm skills.
gay
no UR gay
like times infinity
Nobody, not even America has (or ever will) put a man on The Moon – interesting to observe how different the Chinese Moon photos look from the studio-taken Apollo photos.
lzozozozozozo
zlzoozozozoz
zlozozozozoz
zlzozozozooz
zloozozozozo
lzozozozlozozo
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=130
Brother Nathaniel’s articles are archived on this site. There is a lot of good information on it.
Hopefully she got a real good taste of diversity from one of thwack’s distant cousins, beat, rape and rob style.
Oh, you’re one of those…
zlozozozozlozo
zlzozoozozoz
thwack!! Your brotha from anotha motha has arrived! (and there was much rejoicing…)
Well, hello there. I didn’t know they allowed you patients internet use during breaks.
+1 for the informative and well-argued rebuttal.
Depressing.
And now the Demo-craps want to eliminate all Federal death penalties, including for treason, too…
“Why are 8 Democrats sponsoring a bill to eliminate the death penalty for treason?” Fellowship of the Minds, 30 Dec 2013
http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2013/12/30/why-are-8-democrats-sponsoring-a-bill-to-eliminate-the-death-penalty-for-treason/
Liberals are traitors.
They sleep with the enemy.
they have imposed race replacement on us, we never voted for that.
no wonder treason is no big deal for them
Many of them are also ‘useful idiots’ and/or natural conformists.
“Why are 8 Democrats sponsoring a bill to eliminate the death penalty for treason?”
The question immediately answers itself.
Treason is a bs trumphed up charge. It should be abolished. Getting rid of the death penalty outright… dumb idea i must agree
The whole construct of “prosocial” and “antisocial” is based on certain assumptions of what kind of “society” is valuable overall. It’s an area where “reframing” is imperative because its use by the Left’s use of “social” is most definitely “weaponized” at this point. If the Left’s equality agenda is contrary to humanity’s evolved biology, then that agenda is actually “antisocial” if “social” is taken to mean best-aligned with one’s own biological nature, which seems like a pretty fair definition to me. As long as the Left’s opponents only debate the means to achieving “prosocial” behaviors, as defined by the Left’s definition of “prosocial”, they will be on the losing end more often than not.
“Competition” is a great example. Is it “prosocial” or “antisocial”? The answer one gives says a great deal about the kind of society one envisions as ideal.
Word. There’s no use debating with these people. They are dedicated to your destruction.
The details lie in the definitions and the point of such studies is to create what appears to be a scientific basis to an invented social problem, which needs to be solved for the greater good. This is likely another attempt at pathologizing more male behavior.
This.
Pathologizing the character traits of your political enemies is an ag-old tactic. Are you a Pajama Boy? Don’t like white masculine men? Simple, just get control of the DSM, then come up with a pathology that conveniently has the same symptoms as the people you find personally disagreeable. This shit has passive-aggessive hebe all over it.
Santa666 and everyone, please go to the Toonami website and request the broadcast of the Anime Shugo Chara, Shonen Anime like Naruto have been resurrected on American TV like in the days of Dragon Ball, but since the years of Sailor Moon, a new Magical Girl Anime is still absent from American TV, of the new Magical Girls ,i liked the most Shugo Chara
it needs a timeslot on Toonami !
At first you were a Mexican actress
then you tried to convert us to Hinduism
Then you posted a link to Stormfront
and now you suggest we watch Japanese little girl cartoons???
I’d say you are bipolar but nah, your problem is way more serious than that
Trying to use the luring power of the pussy to get us to do something. Cute.
Have I fucked you recently?
I have been lying quite a lot, this false identity will die this 2013, it was nice to play a Little though
All sociopaths/psychopaths suffer severe emotional neglect/abuse. If you want to blame anyone, blame single mothers and missing fathers. Getting pussy has nothing to do with it.
All sociopaths/psychopaths suffer severe emotional neglect/abuse.
Bold claim. Are you certain that there aren’t any sociopaths who are simply warped from the start?
such bullshit.
i score 20/20. im not malevolent in the least.
just because YOU can’t engage your higher functioning to override your basal herd instinct doesn’t make ME a monster. it may make YOU a cow, pig, whatever common farm animal you wish to identify with, but that’s the luckof the genetic lottery.
i’m an exceptional man, as are the many others like me. we design and rule your life and the other chattel around you. don’t get pissed, it just is.
calm down faggot
oooohgah!
If you guys are so smart, why is it going downhill like a runaway train?
no profit in stability
instability=options, remember?
For such a badass you spend an inordinate amount of time on this website.
if that was a question, i think you just answered it yourself.
One can be well raised but a bit of exposure to the dating world will give plenty of experience in emotional neglect and abuse. What one learns from it is up to the learner. There are plenty of voices telling people to learn that they are inadequate and to try harder. And then there’s red pill.
Once you learn that, all they can do is say you’re bitter, I haven’t seen so much of calling such people sociopathic, but it may be coming. Is DSM-VI to be the next weapon against the red pill?
A lot of people who swallow the red pill are bitter, tho. Now that I observe people more and have seen others who have swallowed the red pill in action, I can tell you what goes on:
beta dude goes for girls at his SMV or slightly above
Those girls burn him
beta dude gets MAD swallows red pill
beta dude thinks being a serial kliler/sociopath/asshole/whatever is the way
beta dude starts picking up girls who are lower in SMV
beta dude treats those girls like shit
beta dude thinks he has learned something
The materials here are for initiation only. To get the quality puss you have to expand your horizons — or just simplify lol. The world is way more superficial than the blue or red pill give it credit for:
1) Get your hygiene fucking sorted (TEETH, smell)
2) Get your appearance sorted (gym, style)
3) Get your confidence sorted (best way to do this is to find a skill or talent that YOU developed and YOU control that YOU are GOOD at….and just export that competent feeling to every action you do — even if it’s WoW; it follows that the more of these skills you develop, the more confident you will be — and it will be the right kind of confidence. Don’t put your confidence in your appearance or your looks)
4) Make her laugh and try to connect.
Follow those, and you can knock some srs boots. FFS just be a cool, fun guy. Forget trying to be a serial killer. Forget super alpha blah blah.
Yup
Getting pussy has nothing to do with it.
It is one more factor. If their sociopathic behavior would mean they couldn’t get loose women to drool over them, most of them would be forced to change. Unfortunately there are more and more such women. And as mentioned in a study posted by CH, when women can get money from parents and government, they become less inclined to choose the stable, boring provider at an early age, and instead spend more time with the exciting cad.
Diversity.
Diversity.
Diversity.
The advance of diversity cannot be divorced from the advance of degeneracy anymore than a man can divorce himself from his own heartbeat without suffering the attendant consequence.
Exactly… more feral negros, more feral hispanics, more whites being imbued with Cathedral “hate yourself”, “anything goes”, “mock everything” and “do what you want” South Parkery, and voila!, a nation of sociopaths who don’t give a rat’s ass about anyone or anything but their next thrill.
This ain’t rocket science.
All controlled by the biggest group of sociopaths of all because that group remained cohesive..
An excellent, oft-overlooked point.
All true. And it must be realised that a debased degenerate and atomised society is much easier to control. Always remember, this is being done to us as part of a deliberate program.
http://irishsavant.blogspot.ie/2013/04/the-opostles-of-degradation.html
Funny thing is this stuff only works on spoilt white women. Men get it. H had article why single women shouldn’t vote and I agree.
Interesting that Sociopathy is on the rise after decades of feminism and after the USA has been moving further to the “progressive” liberal-left every year.
coincidence?
not.
Many say liberalism is a mental disease
Aye sir, that’s true.
Removing all consequences of action and laying the responsibility for those actions at the hand of the state to take care of (welfare, ADC, social security, Obamacare) is hardly individualism.
Liberalism isn’t a mental disease. It’s the natural yearning of twisted, feral humanity.
Conservatism/libertarianism requires conscious and strenuous effort to maintain, because it swims upstream against our natural leanings toward laziness and corruption.
Being a leftoid is easy: just be childish and refuse to face reality. It’s no wonder that it’s such an easy sell.
+1
Being a leftoid is easy:
The resulting consequences of it however are hard.
hard, cold, and brutally unforgiving.
Yep. But the typical leftoid simply blames his self-inflicted pain on us, and then redoubles his efforts.
Personally I think the “conservatives” are worse. As a Lockean- Jeffersonian libertarian, I would not be lumped in with them or any of the 1st and 2nd estates. They delude themselves that they differ, but they are typically nothing but FIRE sector landed gentry reborn , not the tyrants, capitalists, pioneering Americans or any other such force that does not descend from government. I am with them and not modern conservatives who are piles of meat for an insidious virus. The landed intrests and financiers have infiltrated it and corrupted it. And they are the same ones who toss crumbs of what remains to the welfare sewer rats.
I think you’re mixing up republicans and conservatives.
This.
The GOP is almost a worse enemy than The Frankfurt School itself simply because we [stupidly, gullibly, naively] didn’t expect the same damned evil from the GOP that we get from The Frankfurt School.
The revolution can’t come fast enough when we can visit some much-needed justice upon the Bitches and the Miss Lindseys and the entire God-damned Kennebunkport mafia which has ruined the GOP.
Yeah, fuck you, CIA, fuck you NSA, fuck you Secret Service, fuck all of you whores of the Mossad, fuck you.
Don’t forget about Evil Bert.
anyone wanna go back and look at the cuckold rates again?
lol
As Greg Cochran would tell you, don’t trust claims that X or Y disorder is becoming more or less prevalent in the population:
If someone bothered to gather some evidence that supported it [that autism is rising, due to assortative mating], I might. I don’t that it’s clear that there has been any increase at all. I have my doubts as to whether autism is even a useful category: I would say the same about ADHD, and for that matter schizophrenia.
Mental retardation is at least defined: you perform below a certain level on some test.
Most common tests/diagnoses are likely accurate enough to give you a ballpark estimate of how common a certain personality profile is, but are certainly not accurate enough to establish long-term trends.
“Male sociopaths do better with women. This is indisputable. If sociopathy is increasing in America, then we must look to the foundational market of human interpersonal relations — the sexual market — to discover the source of this increasing sociopathy.”
If there is an increase at all, it’s almost certainly not likely due to differential reproductive success of psychopathic men (i.e., evolution).
I would hold off from invoking environmental cues without making it being clear that there is an increase.
Of course, the next question becomes (assuming sampling, etc aren’t problems) is the purported rise in psychopathy adjusted for race?
You agree with a guy that doubts there is such a thing as schizophrenia?
That the classification of various and likely unrelated disorders under the umbrella term of “schizophrenia” isn’t proper, yes, I do.
Part of the definition for Sociopath says; a person who lacks a sense of moral responsibility.
All those young women binge drinking, doing drugs, being very promiscuous, getting abortions as if it was sport, or having kids from 4 different fathers, and posting pics of their immoral behavior on facebook or pics of their cleavage and their body piercings and tattoos and so on and so forth
they have a lack of sense of moral responsibility
and there are more and more of them, and certainly a lot more than there was only 30 or 40 years ago
I would say Sociopathy is on the rise.
Its being normalized deliberately.
Yes,
Democrat morality…
@Canadian Friend:
And there in, almost perfectly, lies the problem with claiming psychopathy is on the rise – diagnosing it is subjective.
Even measuring personality traits is subject to a great deal of noise (such that a considerable portion of the heritable variance is masked).
Until we have solid measures, I’m not going to worry much about supposedly rising psychopathy or other disorders.
More women are doing things that are immoral and they don’t care
and Sociopathy is a lack of sense of moral responsibility.
thus more women are behaving like Sociopaths; it is on the rise
what part of that are you not sure of?
or are you saying that nothing is immoral? that it is all relative?
@Canadian Friend:
“Morality”, especially the kind you’re invoking, is subjective.
Your whole argument perfectly exemplifies the problem.
> ““Morality”, especially the kind you’re invoking, is subjective.”
Don’t waste your time trying to engage an astro-turfing Frankfurt School Nihilist in any sort of a conversation.
Anyone who says, “Morality is subjective” is a serpent which has revealed its true nature.
Derpy McDerperson bleated:
“Morality”, especially the kind you’re invoking, is subjective.
If your claim about morality is objective, then kindly explain how you escaped the subjectivity the rest of us are supposedly trapped by. If your claim about morality is subjective, then we can disregard it as nonsense.
“Of course, the next question becomes (assuming sampling, etc aren’t problems) is the purported rise in psychopathy adjusted for race?”
id love to see it set against r/K. i think that the answer might be too much for these poor dears to bear.
Reblogged this on oogenhand.
Off topic but since we’re on crazy chicks and sociopaths: re: the cutter chick in the tweet– the one who cut her name into the guy’s arm– all I have to say is: massive massive preselection. Better than “my exes are stalkers” game.
I must say I always found Americans the most open and welcoming of people though oddly enough you could never really get to know them. Strange that.
Care to expand on that? I’m American so I’m interested in what standards and expectations you used when coming to that judgment?
Americans will invite you into their homes and then be surprised when you actually show up. We’re rather superficial.
I’ve never encountered that (not being snide). When I invite people over for an event (BBQ, beer and poker, whatever) they show up most of the time. Not sure I get the analogy.
I know what you mean.
People say “how you doing?” but don’t want to hear the answer.
You’re supposed to say “great!” so the other person can get on with their day.
That’s why when someone says “how you doing?”, I say “blow me”. Just kidding, but that’s what I think.
I hate the stupid small talk, I’m not sure if it’s the same everywhere.
‘Diversity’* is a strength
‘Diversity’* is a strength
‘Diversity’* is a strength
Repeat after me: ‘Diversity’* is a strength…
*Diversity = non-White parasites
DIVERSITY IS A JEWPHEMISM FOR WHITE GENOCIDE
DIVERSITY IS PROMOTION OF USELESS ETHNICS OVER GREAT WHITES
DIVERSITY IS A DEATH CULT
Silence witch!!! You clearly have to be re-educated.
I’m outraged!!! I demand apologies!!!
Now follow my fingertip and repeat after me:
‘Diversity is a strength
‘Diversity’ is a strength
‘Diversity’ is a stregth
…
It is more than a strength, it is our GREATEST strength!!!…
well…that is what we are supposed to believe despite mounting evidence that it is actually the opposite
The following is a long read but well worth it,
http://whitelocust.wordpress.com/wake-up-world/the-dangers-of-diversity/
Here is an excerpt,
” … American law schools are accredited by the American Bar Association (ABA), which uses its power to promote diversity. Schools with too many white students risk losing accreditation, which would mean students would not qualify for federal financial aid and, in many jurisdictions, could not even take the bar exam.
In 2000, an ABA reaccreditation inspection discovered that at George Mason University Law School in northern Virginia 93.5 percent of first-year students were white. The ABA recognized that GMU had made a “very active effort to recruit minorities,” but complained that the school was unwilling “to engage in any significant preferential affirmative action admissions program.” With its accreditation at stake, GMU lowered standards for non-white applicants and admitted more: 10.98 percent in 2001 and 16.16 percent in 2002. That was not enough. In 2003, the ABA summoned GMU’s president and law school dean and threatened them to their faces with disaccreditation unless the law school admitted more non-whites. GMU lowered standards even further, and managed to raise its non-white admissions to 17.3 percent in 2003, and 19 percent in 2004. This was still not good enough. “Of the 99 minority students in 2003,” the ABA complained, “only 23 were African American; of 111 minority students in 2004, the number of African Americans held at 23.”… ”
How did incompetence become our greatest strength?
The article also touches on violence and many other problems that are worse everywhere our “greatest strength” can be found.
That explains Moochelle Obongo’s law degree. I bet that tranny couldn’t even tie her laces w/o help of the diversity officer. Her husband is a case of plausible deniability.
Watch it! You’ll hear the Thought Police knock at your door at midnight.
Silence hater!!! Can’t we all just get along?
There should be brotherhood between the dog and the fleas. If the dog doesn’t want to live together with the fleas he’s a viscious hater! Simple as that!
The dog is enriched by the fleas. Without fleas the dog would only have a dog-oriented, boring culture focused on complex hunting and dog-family-rearing, not as exciting as the easygoing life of the flea. The flea surely has much to teach the dog. At any rate, no arguments or studies for this are needed, because Holocaust.
> “The dog is enriched by the fleas. Without fleas the dog would only have a dog-oriented, boring culture focused on complex hunting and dog-family-rearing, not as exciting as the easygoing life of the flea. The flea surely has much to teach the dog. At any rate, no arguments or studies for this are needed, because Holocaust.”
Thread winner.
We can all go home now.
If you have a diverse hiring pool with university credentials, always do your own job-related reassessment.
I’m not sure if you’re allowed to include formally in your assessment the near certainty that a degree from University X is far more meaningful for a white male (even moreso, an asian male) than a heavily-favored person like, say, a black female. You should be allowed to include that because it’s statistically very obvious and very important, and I don’t know if there is case history about this.
You may have to reverify qualifications yourself. Keep good records, you can expect to have to prove you hired based on job-related objective factors.
POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS PEACE
PRIVACY IS SLAVERY
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH
The left/libtard progressive Amerika version of 1984 for today…
As Robert Putnam has discovered, ethnic and racial diversity reduces trust and social cohesion. Radically heterogeneous societies lose their aura of connectedness.
The ottoman Empire, and I’d guess Rome. How do chinks do it?
They make a lot of chinks and expand into neighboring territories.
And let’s not forget the Byzantine Empire. Where the economy was actually upheld for a long time only through the steady influx of West Romans, who brought the money and know-how. And the discipline and culture, I bet.
Quite a dilemma for a natural sheepdog with a “let it burn” outlook and a knowledge of world history.
I would argue that tough times, historically, correlate with low levels of sociopathy. Cooperation and trust is essential in dealing with tough times. And outlying sociopaths get punished severely. You see this in hunter-gatherer societies. Living on the thin edge of survival. There is a LOT of killing, absent any state or government. But sociopathy in the Western sense seems not to exist. That is because kin-networks are all and they depend on cooperation. Sociopaths get sussed out quickly (there is nowhere to hide in small societies) and punished severely.
Individualism is not the problem here. The Nazis were sociopaths by and large (leadership I mean), but they lived a very conformist, anti-individualist world view. Same with the Soviets. The ChiComs and NORKs are notoriously anti-individualist to a fault and their leadership all to a man display extreme levels of sociopath and narcissistic tendencies, all of the tooty frooty “interconnectedness, Star-Wars The Force culture” stuff notwithstanding. There is a difference between individualism and atomization, with one being healthy and the other being a view imposed from above which disassociates all actions from responsibility (by intent and design). Americans in 1890 were very rugged individualists, far greater than most here or anywhere else in these united States, who held together just fine and had a good sense of community. So while it’s correct to note the homogenous culture being superior to the multi-cult, blaming individualism is at best a very, very far stretch that flirts heavily with argumentum ad absurdum.
There is nothing to celebrate about a culture that creates abnormal levels of sociopaths, any more than there is to celebrate sociopaths. It’s kind of a dichotomy for these kinds of boards, on the one hand snickering like hyenas about how cool it is to embrace sociopathic tendencies for little more than getting your dicks wet, while on the other lamenting the lack of good women who are worth keeping. You can have one or the other but not both, as end of the day you cannot serve two masters. So you either embrace being a sociopath and give up any pretense of ever finding a decent woman, or you strive to restore society to a more rational basis (presumably divorced entirely from the Cult of Multi). Paening for what you don’t have while simultaneously intentionally acting as its destroyer is illogical.
Yeah, I call bullshit on “individualism”. Diversity, pop culture, dispersion (imagine being a sociopath, or even a minor criminal, in a small, close-nit community), social media, etc. All come way before individualism
What CH means is a society where people are looking out for number one in practice – even though this society promotes togetherness and solidarity in theory. As always, the Left does the opposite of what it says. “Solidarity” leads to people looking out for themselves only and not caring about other people.
I remember stories about this from the Soviet Union. People were empoverished by communism, and always kicked around by anyone who was higher up the ladder. So everyone learned to kick those below whenever they could.
A Western journalist in Cambodia wrote after communism about how a little girl fell down from a tree and the pavement head-first. This was in the middle of the day, but people just kept walking past the child. Only this Westerner rushed to help. That is what the Left’s ideology really does in a society – live under criminal control and people stop caring for others. Everything turns cold and cruel.
Great comment.
The good women disappeared before Game was promulgated to deal with the problem. It happened in that order, not the reverse, unambiguously. So we cannot “have one or the other” at our option, we did not have the option of better women.
The Nazis were sociopaths by and large (leadership I mean), but they lived a very conformist, anti-individualist world view.
First of all, it’s Nazists. “Nazi” was a slur invented by the German communist party, and therefore picked up by British and then American media. It is like saying “commie”. Believing that “Nazi” is the real word simply reveals ignorance.
Second, Third Reich Germany had a much lower tax rate than for example Britain. And the gun laws from the Weimar Republic were relaxed, with widespread gun ownership in the form of hunting rifles and guns from the War. The only ones who were disarmed were the communists and non-Germans. The police were also disarmed, not even allowed to carry truncheons as Hitler considered those demeaning to the public. And still there were no guerrillas, no uprisings, as people loved the peace that came when the communists were jailed.
Germans were the most well-educated people in the world – that is a fact. They were allowed to leave the country at any time. (Jews too, in which case they could keep their wealth, and many did.) Since Germans were more educated than any other people, and since there were many areas around Germany where people spoke German (and many Germans spoke English, some spoke French), they had plenty of opportunities to leave. But they didn’t. Likewise in fascist Italy, where people also could emigrate at any time, one third of the Italians who had left for America came back home, so that there were more immigrants than emigrants.
This in stark contrast to communist countries, which always have laws forbidding people to leave, since they otherwise would leave in great numbers.
So your view of Germany as “conformist” and “anti-individualist” or any other school-textbook labels you wish to use is misinformed. But yes – Marxist “modern art” was banned. I suppose that can be called “conformist”, right? How great that we live in a “non-conformist” West now, where not only the Left’s worldview is promoted. Oh, wait….
Excellent point. Would up-vote you were the mechanism available.
“Male sociopaths do better with women.”
Male sociopaths do better with rebellious women. They are cut from the same cloth.
And most women are rebellious.
Still looking for that innately life-partner type, eh? *smh*
Sure.
That doesn’t mean I don’t have any grasp of reality.
Thanks to game…I can spot these women a mile away. Back in blue pill land I might have been dumb enough to play Captain Save A Ho.
Its best to think they all have a demon that fills the void. Its is only driven out with exorcism with thy holy staff.
The question is…
Are you strong enough to drive out demons?
It isn’t an easy thing to do either.
You know all those naive, young girls pimps exploit? Its the same interface. Some dumb ass, ghetto dwelling, toothless meth junkie is going to run rings around a man of my resources?…I don’t think so…
And they didn’t.
Some might be destined to be Ho’s, but mostly its only because their own will has received a new habitation.
“Alpha I know, and Sigma I have heard about, but who are you?”
You know all those naive, young girls pimps exploit? Its the same interface. Some dumb ass, ghetto dwelling, toothless meth junkie is going to run rings around a man of my resources?…I don’t think so…
chi-town, it isn’t only about pimps and ghetto dwellers. It is about women being more eager to go with the aggressive guy than with the provider. And more and more women become like that as a society darkens. But yes, there are still many women who don’t like sociopaths.
So be more aggressive. The point is to bring the failure into focus when losing to a pimp. Obviously if women can get their own stuff then it reduces the value of it in sexual exchange.
Be
Aggressive
B-E
Aggressive
astute.
i like you earl.
You forgot the “no homo.”
ah. no homo.
Dark Enlightenment: ‘Sociopathy’ is a trait groomed by nature. What these WHO NWO clowns are doing is prescribing globalist mindthink for an imaginary disease of individuality culled by ecology, not to remove all sociopathy but rather to remove all other ‘cultural sociopathy’ (cultural identity and organization) that could rival NWO organized sociopathy. Fuck them. He who sociopaths last sociopaths best. Today: To pussy. Tomorrow: To arms. The next day: To husbandry and home.
“Worship is not on bended knee,
Nature knows not of mercy.
To pray is to accept defeat.
Power pisses on the weak,
Bow and beheaded by the beast,
Beggar on a bitches leash,
Scum is desperate for relief,
Worship is the way I ride,
Witching currents through the eye,
Of storms that force the false to die,
Worship the flames with which I rise
Into apocalyptic skies…”
i gotta theory called the shit head theory. up until life got easy enough for the ladiez to start acting like petulant children, things were hard and natural selection made sure we had a strong, viable population.
once daily life started to get easier and easier, women started to twist their nurturing and controlling behavior together (because they were now relatively safe and had the time) and their weak little offspring shitheads had a much better shot at survival, and so they did. assisted by technology.
then we had a shithead explosion of weak beta males (the present) which are evolving, through an SMP that hasn’t changed much, into herbs.
guys with the skilz, either natural or learned, are filling the gap nicely, and women, devoid of any social controls like religion etc. are welcoming the Dark Triad with open legs.
nature rushed to fill a vacuum and like any other, and viola, the dark triad has not just legs, it squats a single rep max at 650.
i know its an oversimplification, and not new, but its the best way i’ve found to explain the smp and the sphere to people who i deem worthy of an unplug.
nah. technology and social media are a better explanation than all that.
“their weak little offspring shitheads had a much better shot at survival, and so they did. assisted by technology.”
agree wholly.
Agreeing with yourself? Does this show that you’re not schizo, or that you are?
You think women were always thus and it’s the men who got weaker. I think men are mostly OK, indeed genetics haven’t changed much. Men are raised by women to be herbs, and women are raised to be bitches, neither of those conditions held 150 years ago.
reread my reply lol.
as to your second comment, men are no longer required…..until they will be once again FamilyMan. it’s what you do in the meantime….
He sometimes forgets to sock puppet a different name when patting himself on the back… lulz.
Mostly with you. Though how would that correlate with middle class folks in the 1850′s or even 1910′s. Both had it pretty easy compared to all previous generations of human beings, and by the 1910′s your chances of having a hard life in middle class America were slim to none unless it was self imposed. Yet you’d have found strong and fast family cohesion and women who were basically decent and what we’d call now conservative, modest even, without the “twist” you mention.
That’s all I wonder about. The survival of the weakest via technology has done a real hamstring on humanity in my opinion. We not only have very little danger of death at childbirth or during upbringing, we also now have no real massive wars that bring down the natural population of males. Technology developed by men is allowing women to survive without men or even from having to make decisions that are bad (from day to day) so that they rarely get to suffer the consequences of their own bad choices. From computers allowing them feigned knowledge to welfare (provided on our backs) to pick up their little candy asses and dust them off, men are basically working against themselves these days in a headlong rush to develop even more “labor saving devices”.
Personally, and this is my own little streak of sociopath coming through, it would not pain me terribly to see a lot of this come tumbling down IF I knew it would result in a better future for humanity/men. I really don’t see that at this point, I suspect most women would rather self-extinguish rather than give up Twitter. Scientific studies are even starting to show very strong correlations that it’s akin to a severe drug addiction. This ain’t gonna end well, and I have no solutions whatsoever to offer. There is no good path.
Rambling, sorry.
the longer we wait to crash it, the uglier it’s gonna be. do it now while there is still a semblance of decency in us and we may build something that doesn’t look like mad max. let the psycho’s continue to profligate and well….
“1850′s or even 1910′s”
antibiotics? medical advances in general?
Not the point. They had a far easier life than any before them, and even by today’s standards it wasn’t that bad. Yes, it would suck if you’re used to your head in an iZombie all day, but it really wasn’t that terrible, especially in 1910. The comforts didn’t mean you wouldn’t die, just as they don’t mean you are immune from dying today.
The point was simple to follow: if a basically relaxed, essentially less dangerous life grew feminism, then it sure didn’t appear to do so back when we still have a relaxed, less dangerous life. That meaning, there are other factors at play here.
ok. ill be more clear. post 1950 when the boomer started exploiting brown people and extracting their wealth. when the american quality of life exploded vis a vis the rest of the planet.
why do i always have to be the one with creative thinking skills and come up with the ideas?
“Technology developed by men is allowing women to survive without men or even from having to make decisions that are bad (from day to day) so that they rarely get to suffer the consequences of their own bad choices. ”
Well, if you by technology mean a high rate of taxation and a fully corrupt bureaucracy of zealots. The betas built the gun pointed at their head and voted for their own destruction.
‘Antifragile’ by nassim Nicholas taleb is excellent on this subject. All the modern day comfort shit we have to make us more comfortable actually makes us weaker in the long term. Also I lke twitter – depends on who you follow I suppose. It’s Facebook that’s for girls. They should rename it ‘nosy bitch’
what a theory! just figuring this out now, are you
hey man you should start a blog
not bad for a silly fag eh?
OOOOGah!
According to NIH — rather than her book — the prevalence is at around 1%. Also, men are more likely to be sociopaths than women….little surprise there.
They just call female sociopaths “borderline personality disordered” but make no mistake they’re sociopaths.
They have no empathy, they see everyone as something to be used. Male sociopaths are cold, female ones are overly emotional, but they are both just as calculating, just as destructive.
“Bold claim”
If you read any book by any FBI profiler dealing with serial killers, you’ll find these killers suffered dysfunctional families and severe emotional/physical abuse, usually at the hands of women. Those are the worst psychopaths – the serial killers, the multilators, the necrophiles (who sometimes have sex with their victim’s body parts), the cannibals. Ted Bundy and Jeffrey Dahmer.
The stupid ones end up dead or in prison. The smart ones become politicians.
Are some just born bad? Yes. If you’ll look at the neurologist James Fallon, he found he has the brain structure of a psychopath – and he’s descended from a line of killers, including Lizzie Borden. What did he say saved him? A wonderful, loving childhood.
Those who support the Dark Triad as something good don’t even know what it is.
It’s good at getting your goals achieved, you don’t get powerful by being empathetic.
Empathy is a core leadership trait. It also is the key to destroying your enemy.
Game has been corrupted by science fiction fantasy like yours. This omegastic “lone wolf” (social loser) escapism with a bitter attitude substitutes for the much more difficult skill set necessary to command men, from among them and above them.
In the book Ender’s Game, the apparently-sociopathic elder brother, Peter, is so good at manipulating people because he understands their fears. The apparently angelic elder sister, Valentine, is so good at manipulating people because she understands their anguish. The youngest, Andrew, is so good at leading people because he has both of those things and more.
See. This is how I know that the majority of you people are nerds who never go out and actually try to get laid. The computer words and headlines are your reality. Of course you believe that empathy precludes power.
If you lack awareness of what other people feel and you are a sociopath, you are going to be just as unsuccessful as any other guy.
Calibration = key skill in game. You need empathy to calibrate.
I’d say this trend is happening because the incentives for being pro social are disappearing.
When women go for the bad boys, the cads, the guys who are selfish jerks to them, what incentive do men have to be respectful providers? None.
When jobs and money go to the undeserving, the affirmative action crowd, the people who don’t necessarily do better work but just know how to game the system, what incentive do men have to buckle down, better themselves, and put in quality work to better the community?
As much as (I find) the tragedy of the commons to be over cited by those with even a small amount of college education (they heard it once freshman year and then cite it for the rest of their lives) it really is how it works-
Society, being socially well adjusted, working together, only works if EVERYONE (or at least an appreciable majority, or a strongly influential minority) is playing the game. As soon as we have one group of assholes playing for themselves and getting REWARDED (pussy, money, whatever) everyone else being a team player is really just being a schmuck. And no one wants to be a schmuck.
Want to turn society around? Reward the people who are team players.
+1
People who are team players are already rewarded. For some reason everyone equates sociopath with charismatic pussy slayer. At the higher levels all of this shit is way subtler than you guys are giving it credit for.
Most of ya’ll NEED TO WORK on being “team players” first. Become a cool, well-liked guy. That will solve like 90% of your pussy problems, assuming you’re a decent fuck.
Past that point, ya you probably could work on being more Machiavellian — really the trait that sociopathy enables. But this is removed from just sociopathy for its own sake. All you’re doing is using your social credibility to its maximum advantage. You build up capital by becoming a cool, well-liked guy….and learning how to invest that capital for social returns is the Machiavellian/sociopathic part. Of course, the investing and harvesting and applying requires empathy — even it’s a calculating empathy. So, ultimately, you still need to be a team player.
Full sociopath is just omega. Or, at best appealing to the most damaged of women (not saying some of those women aren’t hot). I’d rather hold on to my personal viewpoints of the world and apply what power I gain toward those ends tho.
“All you’re doing is using your social credibility to its maximum advantage. You build up capital by becoming a cool, well-liked guy….and learning how to invest that capital for social returns is the Machiavellian/sociopathic part. Of course, the investing and harvesting and applying requires empathy — even it’s a calculating empathy.”
that’s called Beta.
“Full sociopath is just omega.”
….is what a Gamma would say.
Dominance (Alpha/Sigma) is the implication of Physical/Psychological/Emotional violence to advance your agenda. You dial it BACK to allow compliance and an escape route for your subjects.
You should re-read The Art of War, 48 Laws of Power, hell, all of it. If you really wanna grow into your full potential you MUST stop half-assing it.
Just sayin’
No one gives a fuck about your PPE violence unless you first have value. Unless you’re deriving that from your appearance or stature you must first gain the admiration/respect of the group. Gamma is something a dork would say. But yeah, you guys can keep circle-jerking each other with this James Bond meets Machete meets Hannibal fantasy caricature.
meanest and most ruthless respect commanding motherfucker i ever met on this planet was a 5 foot blond chick.
shrug.
Violent crime has declined markedly in the past 20 years. So has teen pregnancy. Drug use has either remained stable or has declined as well. If sociopathy has increased over the past 20 years, why have these metrics of social decay improved significantly over the same time period? Perhaps they will reverse themselves and we are in the calm before the storm.
Because the Boomer Negros are to old to steal and kill now!!!!
Guess we’re bucking the trend here.
Crime’s about the same, drug use may be higher or the same, teen pregnancy ditto.
No shortage of grandmas in their mid-30′s.
The prisons are bursting at the seems and the police departments have become small armies with armour and air power. The price for that 20 year decline is outright tyranny for everyone.
This is OT but maybe someone can help me deal with this irritating situation. I’ve been seeing this girl whose boyfriend is away in army boot camp. He just recently came back for winger break but will leaving in a few days. Now to make a long story short I’ve been fucking her endlessly and she loves it. I applied game and blew every beta in my social circle out of the water. She was even considering breaking up with him to be with me. I’ll let you know she is in a serious relationship with him and phones his mother and has a strong bond with his family. She just came back from meeting with him in NYC and tells me we “have to be friends now.” He is leaving shortly but will return in a month or so. She keeps inviting me out but I’m getting annoyed with the friend shit. Should I call her out on this bullshit? Is this a shit test? What does a young alpha in training do? Any advice would be great. Saturday night she scheduled a date and wants me to take her out. Should I just go and pay no attention?
you are not an alpha in training, you are a scavenger, she is obviously calling the shots and she owns you, just get out of this entire situation immediately dipstick
Although as VFW right here will tell ya, i choke on man meat so what do i know, but this sissy agrees with that dried up old soldier.
you are in over your head and are gonna get fucked up like the hyena you are SO SHE CAN GET HER ATTENTION FIX.
oooohgah!
A young alpha fucks her when he goes out with her? Why would you waste time on a girl who you know isn’t going to fuck you? It sounds like you’ve tried several times and been denied. Move on. There’s more chicks.
I assure you every time we have gone out I’ve have always brought her back to my place and fucked. Now that she’s been in NYC she has came back with this “let’s jut be friends” shit test. I have decided to just cut her off entirely.
Agree you should cut her off entirely unless you want to be “just friends”. This could be dangerous if boyfriend finds out. You might consider whether you want an M16 or similar ejaculating into you.
Ignore her. Don’t go out don’t respond if you really want to keep sleeping with her.
You will get caught eventually. FYI
Just start signing in as “whoresfriend”
oh…in that case just agree and keep fucking her. It’s just a shit test. As soon as you get her alone again you’ll bang.
One morning show up at her front door with breakfast that you’ve masterfully prepared yourself. When she opens the door, reveal the delicacies from underneath a gold-plated shielding, poor the foodstuffs down your trousers, and then ask her for a second helping.
Nonsense. Greece is as homogeneous as any country can get it. Civic duty? Public trust? Lol. Corruption is endemic. It’s a free for all, sociopathy run amok.
Or how about Sicily with la mafia? Or mother Russia? Or Argentina? All homogeneous societies with high levels of crime, corruption, sociopathic behaviors.
Argentina ?
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t994853/
first you were a Mexican actress… then you tried to convert us to Hinduism …and now you come up with a link to stormfront
What are you smoking?
I am not a Mestiza, a minority of Mexico the 16% is White and i am one of them , why wouldn’t make sense that i support stormfront? i just made money on Mexico and i want to be out of here fast, what country should i live in ? not sure, it could be United States, Japan, United Kingdom or Spain, each of these countries have their appeal.
http://www.japanator.com/review-sailor-moon-30735.phtml
Fuck Japan. The Japanese are hugely racist against whites.
Unless you’re blonde, in which case they’ll still think you’re an idiot…which you can use to extract some resources.
Rap,
you never told me what I forgot to ask you
Greece homogeneous? You’re kidding right?
It’s a country of 11 million, 2-3 million of which are illegal immigrants.
Greeks do not interact with the foreigners other than basic necessities. Inter racial dating is taboo especially for the women.
The Albanians, of course, deny their own heritage as they learn flawless Greek and even claim they are from “northern Epirus”
Keep reading online stats
I need some help with a girl.
This girl initially messaged me over facebook we bantered and met up for a date some time ago. Initially I told her it would only be 30 min but I was enjoying it and so I let it go on longer. The date lasted 2 to 2.5 hours.
During the date, we wanted to get a coffee, but the place where we met up was full and had no spaces. So I suggested we walk around a nearby mall and look for a starbucks there. We would walk around the mall from store to store and I would grab her hand and pull her in the direction i wanted to go. Id put my hand on her lower back, on her waist and eventually started touching her ass. Eventually we found a starbucks and had some coffee (she paid for both of ours, although i told her i’d pay for my own). After the coffee we walked around some more and I tried to kiss her after saying, “I think you have beautiful lips, I want to kiss them”. But she said, “too bad didn’t happen”. Eventually we left the mall and walked outside so i pushed her to the wall and tried to kiss her again, but she turned her face down and looked shy. But I held her and eventually felt her put her leg in between my legs and I knew she felt my boner. I let her off the wall and she started looking at movie posters plastered on the wall. One of these posters she pointed out to me said, “Men & Women” and I added in “kiss” while moving in for the kiss and got it. I then grabbed her hand and led her to the bus stop. As we were about to leave she gave me a giant hug, and I said, “you give me a hug without a kiss”. She said you can kiss me on the cheek and I was like, “nah ill grab your ass instead” whilst grabbing her ass at the same time. While I was standing at the bus stop, she texted me saying I could get a kiss if I hurried before her bus arrived. I was like w/e, didnt feel like getting her to come a few bus stops to me. When I came to her she gave me this doggy dinner bowl look and I kissed her and left. I was wondering whether it was a beta/needy move to come over to her bus stop to kiss her?
I was fairly dominant during the date, leading the interaction, getting her to qualify to me. When I kinoed her she would kino me back. For example when i went to hold her hand, shed started interlocking fingers with me or checking out my hands.
So I called a girl to set up a day 2, after which she told me that I am not good at pulling off the jerk personality and so I should tone it down a bit. A bro who I daygame with tells me the same thing, to drop the douchebag personality because it doesn’t suit me. But if I drop the douchebag personality, I’d start failing shit tests, frame tests, etc because I am a nice person that generally hates playing games.
So onto my story. During day 1 i got to k close and ass grabs, but for day 2 i couldn’t get a single kiss. Id go in and she’d turn her cheek every time or tell me to kiss her on the cheek first.For the date we went to watch a movie, and during the movie id try to escalate kino. So I put my hand on her leg and start slowly moving up it, but she’d always block it. Initially she would just swipe my hand off, but eventually she took my hand in hers, interlocked her fingers with mine, and stroked my hand and put it in her lap. She’d sometimes put her head on my shoulder or her hand on my knee. Yet she wouldn’t let me kiss her, instead pointing to her cheek and say, “cheek first”. We would also sexually banter, and make sexual play on words during the date. Furthermore, whilst our hands where interlocked in her lap, she let me rub her boob with my forearm, but no kiss.
After the movie ended we went for a short walk and i tried to lead and she was unresponsive at times, she would walk ahead or not listen to commands. However, whenever I tried to kiss she’d give me tight hugs, and tell me or hint that Im persistent and she even joked, “has anyone told you, you are annoying”.
Wtf is happening I am so confused? Should I give up on this girl? What did I do wrong? Why no k close on second date but I was able to get a k close on first date? What are my next steps? Should I go for day 3?
I guess her ASD is kicking in and you (and she) have to find a way around it. You were pretty direct at first and it’s been an ongoing battle so ASD is front and center in her mind. Be sure you don’t act butthurt or angry.
The normal way would be actually to date her a few times. This shows you care and aren’t just looking for a hole. Don’t worry about going backwards, she feels some attraction to you, but she wants to be able to see herself being OK doing more.
Might be interesting to find out her sexual history. Is she experienced? A virgin? A party girl? An intellectual?
Maybe others have faster more efficient ideas.
But of course don’t date her in the beta expensive dinner / movie / flowers supplication way, arrange some mutual fun things coffee etc., you know this better than I do but just saying it in case …
You need some “push-pull” technique. Also, you seem to have a touch of one-itis.
Part of your problem is that you aren’t enjoying the game. Relax without relaxing your frame.
It also sounds like your comfort building technique needs some real work. Go do some reading. You should never, ever hear a girl tell you that you are annoying. Annoying is the kill of the tingle. Quit your single minded focus on the kiss, it isn’t the end all be-all of goals in early dates.
Read up some recent comments on turning the kiss on the cheek into a quick nuzzle on the neck. Not all women respond equally to kissing, in fact it isn’t even necessary to kiss to get to bed.
Could you suggest some good material to read on comfort building?
Also, how do you relax and enjoy the game?
This is perfect material for a Yareally mind-blowing post.
brb prepping the popcorn…
In the new year, seek better entertainment.
Oh, hush with the envy. Your grammar is better; take comfort in that.
LOL! I find each of them quite enlightening in diametrically opposite ways, if that makes any sense.
Heh. heh… MK may be guilty of many things… but envy of the girl-shitters and their ilk AIN’T one of ‘em.
And while we’re on the subject, could CH please give a week time-out to the next stupid cooze who chimes in with the “just jealous” litany?
Hush with the lame attempt to stir shit up. Because you are not lame.
You are much better than stooping to a transparently absurd accusation for instigating the usual, virtually automatic and unconscious female ploy of “Let’s You and Him Fight … For My Amusement.”
The only thing more disappointing than that lazy attempt is your still lazier equivalence of envy and contempt. In women envy is the result of hidden admiration expressed as contempt. Men are more aware and more direct and know the score too well to try pulling that unintentional reverse psychology on their brothers.
When a dude tells another dude, “You’re an asshole,” it’s not like the way women say it. I don’t secretly think his mind- and scroll-finger-numbing disquisitions are popcorn-level entertainment. You’re half-a-bro yourself, you should get this.
Matt
Sounds to me, without being there and seeing the interactions first hand,that you were escalating too fast in a hurried fashion. Like the other guy said, enjoy the interraction by relaxing.
Did it feel awkward when you were trying to kiss her and she kept denying you? You’re coming off as sexually starved, she’s picking up on it.
Try going cold on her. Let her contact you. When she does, set up a date, but be aloof, NOT butthurt.
DO NOT BE BUTTHURT OR PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE.
See how she interracts. Sounds like shes trying to make you lease the cow first. If she escalates physically, be unreactive. Flip the script and see what she does.
ESL bro?
yeah man.
I disagree – a sociopath behaves in disregard to society’s norms. Maybe 50 years ago these people would have been sociopaths, but today they’re behaving very much within society’s norms.
Droll.
Exactly. If you don’t have a two parent family; if you don’t bring your kids up right; if you have a society that disincentivizes males; if you have the slut-it-up society where women become less better looking and have less to offer – well then you have a collapsing society.
Would it be appropriate to throw Michael Vick’s name into the mix? All these chicks attached to the notion of having a dog, but the guy goes to jail for animal cruelty and, in the end, gets a pass. Of course most chicks are drawn in to the whole bad boy mentality. The hamster wheel at work.
Then again, I think I may have just answered my own question….
That’s good because I’m not even sure what your question was.
The increase is sociopathy and the increase in single parenting are likely correlated. A chart showing the increase in both would be interesting.
My parents divorced when I was a baby, but went back to court over custody issues later on and I got dragged through all that. It really does take a toll on a kid emotionally. You learn to emotionally detach from both parents and mediate between the two. I’m no special case, though. Lots of kids I know with split parents are the same way. It helps in dating, sure, but at the same time, people (family mainly) thinks I’m some kind of monster without compassion because I’m not affected by emotional situations.
What’s interesting is when you meet a partner who’s similar. It’s almost as if they can emotionally relate to your lack of emotion. Current girl I’m seeing is the same as me and it’s pretty nice. There’s no crying over frivolous bullshit or unnecessary drama.
Granted, I guess she could end up being crazy…
> “You learn to emotionally detach”
An exceedingly important observation.
365 days in a year, 365 race-baiting essays in Salon. Coincidence?
http://www.salon.com/2013/12/30/2013_the_year_in_whiteness
I stopped reading at ” the non-existent war on Christmas”
which was in the first sentence of the article…
Written by the socialist Joan Walsh, I see. She is simply a prostitute who picks a side that will give her money. That’s all she is. In a fundamentalist society she would write stories praising religious fanaticism. In the Soviet Union she would have written stories praising Stalin and spitting at the millions of “saboteurs” he killed. In a conservative society she would praise the family and call for the killing of sexual whores, her competitors. She is a word prostitute through and through.
“Interpersonal relations” take time and energy; much easier to use state power and draw resources and security away from others, leading to a return to baser instincts for mate selection (youth & beauty for women, thuggishness in males). Virtuous qualities no longer holding any value in a statist society, and get thrown out with the trash…
I wouldn’t be surprised if in a decade the US President is a former MMA fighter – his wife a former lap-dancer. This is the way it seems to be going…
Start buying stock in Brawndo now.
Well, it does have the electrolytes.
what is Brawndo?
See the movie “Idiocracy”.
“It has electrolytes!”
http://www.spike.com/video-clips/f8drn8/first-10-minutes-of-idiocracy-clip-1
A must watch for sure. The first time I saw it, I found it to be hilarious, but since it’s release I don’t find it at all funny anymore. Mainly because of how rapidly we are advancing towards it’s reality. We won’t need to be cryogenically frozen to see this come to pass.
We’ve skated past that point. I’d surely rather have Jesse Ventura for Prez than the current one. Far more qualified and capable.
At least he did “something” difficult as a civilian.
But isn’t it a fact that “whites” are the most sociopathic of the races ??
sociopathy definitely has a genetic component and it is a component of the European – especially Northern European DNA – likely a part of the ‘Iceman Inheritance’ – i.e. something picked up from the Neanderthals ……..
Hardly a fact. Anecdotally, I’d say blacks are the most sociopathic; that is have the highest percentage of sociopaths in their ranks.
But the white race has it’s share, that’s for sure. Those psychos made bigger waves in human history because the white race became the strongest.
Al is black himself. This is why he’s being ridiculous and saying that we are the most sociopathic — a classic case of projection.
If anything, Thal heritage makes you the opposite of sociopathic: painfully sensitive to other people’s feelings.
Neanderthals don’t watch Seinfeld.
http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/12/29/3842994/two-dead-in-domestic-shooting.html
Hypergamy strikes again. Wife leaves father with 7 year old daughter, shacks up with new man weeks later. Predictable result.
Woman a Latina of course
But isn’t it a fact that “whites” are the most sociopathic of the races ??
sociopathy definitely has a genetic component and it is a component of the European – especially Northern European DNA – likely a part of the ‘Iceman Inheritance’ – i.e. something picked up from the Neanderthals ……..
LOL Here comes the Black leftist again. All Blacks have is “Whites have Neanderthal blood!” Hmm, about eight percent of White, Arab, middle-Asian and East Asian DNA is from the Neanderthals. Meanwhile humans have about 98 percent of DNA in common with apes, does that make us apes?
In fact, humans have 98 percent of DNA in common with rats. Leftist losers don’t understand what DNA is. The vast majority of DNA is inactive. Of the active parts, the vast majority is simply there to produce skin, bones, hair, nails, blood. Much less than 1 percent is of the complicated kind that creates human beings.
Meanwhile, Blacks have 100 percent of their DNA in common with Blacks. Oops. That’s quite a bit more serious than having eight percent of DNA from the humans called Neanderthals. Until Whites raised them, Blacks were on the same level as the Neanderthals, and looked even more primitive – the slanted forehead, the protruding jaw, the teeth that are almost identical to those in apes, etc. (Blacks in Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia and that area, actually call the Blacks in western Africa “the apes” because of their appearance.) Didn’t even invent the wheel or the sail, and relied on slaves for thousands of years until British, French and other Whites forced them to stop at gunpoint.
As for who is most sociopathic, Whites and East Asians are the cultures who have the most family cohesion and respect for law. Blacks are the ones who had societies where men abandoned the women and the children were roaming free in the village – still do, gangs of feral children are endemic in African cities. And half of all armed conflicts take place in Africa. Which produces only two percent of the world’s GDP. So who is the most sociopathic?
Yet aping Negro mannerisms is a time-honored way of attracting females.
I have been approached by women after having been seen slapping hands and “talking jive” with the Black Gentlemen.
Really? Genetic determinism?
Wowe, such hubris all around.
Hey now, don’t go insulting the neanderthals like that.
Don’t forget blacks never came up with a written language, thus have no written history.
It was whites who made dictionaries of the very limited African languages that do not even have words such as “promise” ( I have a link but it is too late I am going to bed )
and when Europeans found them they were still living in mud huts, drinking water from the same pond their animals defecated in ( saw it on PBS which is definitely not a right wing “racist” source of information )
And they have been around at least 150,000 years while whites have been around maybe 50,000 years
they still rape young girls because they believe doing so will cure them of AIDS while we make heart transplants and fly rockets to the moon
They own slaves in Sudan and a few other African nations
Those of them who are Muslim cut off women’s clitoris
and this is the short list
Is cutting off a girl baby’s clit worse than cutting off a boy baby’s foreskin?
The rest I’ll agree is more depressing than conditions outside Africa.
I’m circumcised. Don’t know the difference and have a good sex life. No clit will kill a woman’s sexuality. It would be the same as having your dickhead removed.
Remember than males don’t matter.
Cut off a baby boys foreskin…who gives a shit, he’s not even human.
A guy sleeps with a 15 year old girl consentually…throw that motherfucker in jail.
“The vast majority of DNA is inactive.”
You’re one of those people who believed them when they said most of DNA was “junk DNA” and really didn’t matter. Careers were made under the fallacy that because we don’t understand what those parts do, they don’t do anything important. All the while we still didn’t understand more than a glimmer of how it all worked together to make a human body. Incredible stupid hubris, unless it succeeds in getting you grants and publications, then it’s very strategic hubris.
But this is not required for your other point, that it’s fair to describe much of what happens in Africa as sociopathic.
FamilyMan
it’s fair to describe much of what happens in Africa as sociopathic
————————————————————————————————
and when there is nothing left to conquer, the conquerors will turn their weapons on each other;
anything less would be uncivilized.
History is quite cyclical in this way. The madness of the West is starting to peak and there will be tremendous blowback against non-whites.
But then, at some future time, things will turn right side up again and then all the old tribes will start to splinter along whatever lines they’ve always splintered on and we will turn our weapons upon each other. Nothing new under the sun…
Regarding DNA, this is correct. There have already been significant inroads into the some of the functioning of so called “junk DNA”. But it is not atypical of scientific hubris.
There is the concept in astrophysics of “dark matter” too whereas for a long time space was just ‘empty’. At least they have dialed it back a bit and admitted they are not 100% sure of exactly what it is. I am guessing it has a purpose and a function we may simply lack the senses or scientific advancement to even begin to understand.
Dark matter is posited to provide an explanation consistent with our theory of gravity for the deceleration of universe expansion. Stuff seems to be attracted to the other existing stuff more than expected based on the mass of the matter we can observe, much moreso in fact, so we assume there’s a lot of other matter we cannot observe.
Scarlett Johanssen and Roseanne Barr share 99.99999%+ of the same DNA.
But boy, does that li’l teeny-tiny difference kick MAJOR ass!!!!!!
“But no nation of sociopaths ever put a man on the moon.”
Well said. There was a workplace study awhile back and it turns out Narcissists -can- sometimes be beneficial to a company.
*But the hitch is, you can only have 1 of them for every (iirc) 50 or 100 ‘normal’ people.
More than that, and everything goes to hell.
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/16/local/la-me-unlicensed-20130116
“Unlicensed drivers in California — the vast majority of whom are illegal immigrants — are nearly three times as likely to cause a fatal crash as licensed drivers, according to a study by the Department of Motor Vehicles.”
I’ll let you guess what the liberals’ proposed solution is.
Provide illegals with safer cars at tax payers expense?
that and amnesty.
I think the idea is to “bring them out of the shadows” by giving them licenses.
A license didn’t make the illegal with an Oregon license (they give them out like toilet paper in Oregon) who was drinking and driving a better driver, the night he rear-ended my family in California.
Totaled our car.
No injury, not a scratch, not a hint of whiplash, nothing, on my wife, my kids or me. We were taken care of.
““Interpersonal relations” take time and energy; much easier to use state power and draw resources and security away from others, leading to a return to baser instincts for mate selection (youth & beauty for women, thuggishness in males). Virtuous qualities no longer holding any value in a statist society, and get thrown out with the trash…
I wouldn’t be surprised if in a decade the US President is a former MMA fighter – his wife a former lap-dancer. This is the way it seems to be going…”
GOOD POINT: see Ancient Rome – general degradation in quality of leaders and their spouses..
Worth watching.
I’ve always found that GC says the most obvious things but taps into popular outrage. He mentions the constitution, how corrupt the politicians are, bla bla bla. More money in the system leads to inflation. Newsflash!
He says it will be a year of extremes. Pretty safe. One year from today, nobody will be able to prove him wrong.
I think its the discussion that stimulates thinking for yourself that is most useful.
I like Gerald a lot but the accuracy of his predictions has been, well, mixed at best.
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”
― Voltaire
Fake quote BTW…
“I shit in my pants.”
-Voltaire
“Apple cider is really tasty.”
— Nietzsche
“I drink, therefore I am.”
– Renes Descartes
“That’s true, but I was only in there to get directions on how to get away from there.”
– RappaccinisDaughter
“Im white *smirk* ”
– Greg Eliot
I look all white, but my dad was black.
Sigh… can’t even get credit as an octaroon… might as well hang me from the nearest tree.
“Ni66ers don’t listen to The Who, ni66er.”
-thwack
So what if it is. It doesn’t make it any less true.
I stand corrected.
The quote is rock-solid truth…
To whom it may be attributed is what is apocryphal.
“James Fallon has come to believe that, in addition to particular brain and genetic patterns, there is a third ingredient involved in the development of a violent psychopath. The environment, he explains, can help determine whether violence-related genes and certain brain processes, such as those involving mirror neurons, are triggered towards aggression. Specifically, he believes that abuse – especially severe early childhood sexual, physical or emotional abuse – is instrumental in this process. And he also believes that the precise timing of when various factors come into play is critically important in determining whether one becomes a psychopath and, if so, exactly what type of psychopathological behavior is exhibited.
“As for why he himself is not a violent man, Dr. Fallon credits his upbringing in a highly nurturing environment, in which he was not only not abused, but was showered with wonderfully loving family support.”
Confidence gets you poon. Psychopathology removes the fears of the modern world, thus making you more confident and fearless. Women love this. Think of that douche video-taping the floating bag in American beauty, its the lack of fear and shame. Neurosis is the sign of an unreasonable man and we all know what G.B. Shaw said about unreasonable men. They are the music makers, the movers and shakers, for all the world forever it seems.
I was diagnosed with hypomania with sociopathic tendencies and megalomania in my late twenties (I’m 33 now). I can tell you, I never got more sweet, high quality beav than when I was unmedicated and out of my mind. Got lots of pussy in rehab too; crazy broads and unstable men and all that.
“sociopathy has its privileges. But no nation of sociopaths ever put a man on the moon.” — CH
——————————————————————————————————
I encourage those of you suspicious of the Apollo Moon landings not to be shamed into silence and pro space boosterism. At the very least, the official Apollo moon landing records as provided by NASA are inaccurate; and at worst, a straight up lie.
NASA peddles the worst kind of magical thinking.
I have heard that rap and I am conspiracy-minded, but if we faked it, why didn’t our mortal cold war enemies, the Ruskies, drop the dime? Surely they were watching.
Your avatar is a pair of testicles and a penis.
Indeed it does, but at least it isn’t limp.
Manic Beta
but if we faked it, why didn’t our mortal cold war enemies, the Ruskies, drop the dime?
—————————————————————————————————-
There are a few possibilities:
1. They are not and have never been “our mortal cold war enemies”. The highest party members got paid off and their form of government made it much easier to sell the hoax to the public. Dissent was/is not tolerated
2. The Soviets new it was not possible at the time, so they “sold the rights” to the moon landings to the United States; while they continued working on what was possible such as long duration LEO flights, unmanned probes…
I suspect this U.S may sell these same rights to China when they make their moon attempt in exchange for not blowing the whistle on us.
3. It advanced the religion of “magical thinking” which all governments engage in to string their populations along on some bullshit that will never work.
To sum up, I suspect no humans have ever traveled beyond low earth orbit (over 400 mile up)
There isn’t even proof they sent a monkey or a black guy that far into space. Or if they did, it didn’t survive.
Why are the rock samples gathered on the Apollo mission universally acknowledged as being non-terrestrial and why would they fake the moon landing 9 times? How could Observatories detect the retroreflectors on Earth that were installed on the moon by Apollo 15 in 1971?
Mr.B
Why are the rock samples gathered on the Apollo mission universally acknowledged as being non-terrestrial
——————————————————————————————————
MR. B,
It is best to START your analysis raising the questions no one else has asked.
Don’t spend time rehashing the questions you see on the internet, the white man is smart enough to produce elements that don’t even exist naturally in nature; what makes you think he can’t produce “non-terrestrial ” rocks?
For example, why does it take 2 days to get to the I$$ but only 3 days to get to the moon?
or,
Why did the most recent Mars Lander require that complicated contraption to avoid kicking up Martian dust, but the Lunar Module did not?
Or, and here is one I thought up,
In the six sucessful attempt to land on the moon, you never saw any recordings of activities inside the Lunar Module WHILE IT WAS ON THE MOON?
Why not?
Imagine you and your buddy just walked on the moon and then you get back inside the LM and what do you do?
High fives?
Bro hugs?
Look out the windows…
My suspicion is that 1/6th gravity is much more difficult to fake than “zero gravity” and they didn’t think they could pull it off INSIDE THE LUNAR MODULE so they skipped faking that part. For example, the famous “phone call from Nixon” was not recorded inside the LM while it was on the moon.
Why not?
My point is, there are many inconsitencies in the official Apollo record which NASA simply ignores, despite the fact they are the ones who are supposed to have pulled it off.
I admit that most of my “evidence” is behavioral instead of based on the science; but this is how most lies are revealed.
Check out this post Apollo 11 flight press conference and tell me if these 3 white men seem apprehensive and uncomfortable about discussing their great sucess?
I know white men can be uptight, but these ni66as be acting like they stole somethin?
Thwack, good post. I’ve always been suspicious of how they got an aluminum can through the fadiation belt, to the moon and back with post ww2 technology during the middle of a cold war propaganda race and no one has dared to go beyond our upper atmospheric region again. Again, good post.
I would not bat an eyelash if the photos were faked. Every TV dinner has fake photographs not related to the content inside. That does not mean there was no moon landing though.
True chi-town. And thats why Im always careful to say the official Apollo moon landing records as presented by NASA are inaccurate.
The photos are way too sexy.
One theory I have is at a certain point, it because clear that an actual moon landing with any chance of success was going to take a lot more money and much bigger and better equipment.
The Feds refused to provide more money but offered to continue the program into the 70s if they could fake it.
The leadership decided it was better than admitting defeat and the rest is history.
Marcus Allen has done several seminars on the Apollo photos; but he is kinda tainted by the fact he works for one of those “conspiracy magazines”.
But he is a professional photographer who definately understand the complexities of pre digital photography.
I guess we had a deal worked out with the Aliens to put retroreflectors on the moon in order to fake the Apollo missions..
This is my general take too. There -are- some very weird things about the landing. The most glaring of which still has no rebuttal by NASA, unlike many of the others.
That is— the most important and historic telemetry tape in history “accidentally” got recorded over. The telemetry data from the 1st moon landing should be in the Smithsonian right? Nah, some B level engineer just decided to record something else on it. Right…
So that shit is pretty flimsy from the supposedly smartest dudes in the business (at that time) in space exploration.
They probably added some puff propaganda to the whole thing, this would not be surprising.
But be sure about one thing, lunar landers are on the moon. Our telescopes today are an order of magnitude more powerful than the 60s and several large telescopic arrays have been pointed at the moon. You can literally, see the landing rig and equipment from several of the missions. And these are not images that were shot by the US Gub’mint. They are from various countries.
The most glaring of which still has no rebuttal by NASA,
No rebuttal = suspicion?
Don’t be dumb… why even bother to answer someone when they point at you and say you have green hair?
And as far as brilliant guys making dumb mistakes = suspicious, well… that one needs no further elaboration.
No one ever cut themselves shaving with Ockham’s Razor… simplest explanations are often the closest to the truth.
For me, it’s always been the radiation and the temperatures involved. Like Thwack said, you gotta have thick thick lead shields and I’ve personally seen the astronaut suits. They’re not suited to protect against the lack of atmosphere and the radiation of the lunar surface. If we did in fact go to the moon, the Apollo missions had nothing to do with it.
Sigh… (((shakin’ mah haid)))
Post got eaten by moderation.
Long story short, the dismissal of contrary points of view on this board is getting old, the same sht I got annoyed with when talking to Matt king.
If you can show where and why what I said was wrong, then do it.
I don’t give a gddmn about how well constructed the verbiage of a post is or how many levels someone believes their rhetorical ability over someone else is, I want answers.
Show me how the Apollo astronauts made it to the moon when they should have been cooked alive inside the capsule by the radiation, without any feminine snark or don’t reply at all, and that goes for anyone.
Patriarch
For me, it’s always been the radiation and the temperatures involved. Like Thwack said, you gotta have thick thick lead shields
———————————————————————————–
Objection your honor
Thats here-say, my client never said that!
Judge: sustained
This lead radiation shielding meme is something that got started and took off like a rocket. Its nonsense. Any radiation shielding would have to be at least dual purpose. Water would work just fine; yes its is heavy, but since you are going to need it anyway, you might as well use it for the shielding too. Matter of fact all your urine and feces would probably serve the same purpose.
NOBODY is carrying tons of lead into orbit at $10,000 a pound as radiation shielding.
Lets put a stop to this silly meme.
BTW– NASA did not need the Saturn 5 and the Soviets definately did not need the N-1 for a moon shot. Why? Because once docking manuvers were mastered, two or three Saturn 1-Bs could have placed all the necessary hardware into orbit for an attempt on the moon. And the Soviets had a very reliable vehicle in the Soyuz, so why did they spend time and money trying to perfect the 30 main engine plumbing nightmare known as the N-1?
Send your command module up on one, your LM up on another, dock them and send the 3rd for trans lunar injection.
It sounds like a complex process, but I suspect its a lot less than designing, building and testing a brand new heavy lift vehicle. Some people suspect the Saturn 5 was basically empty and that the exhaust was designed to look impressive to the novice, but that its was actually inefficient because of the amount of flame.
Compare the exhausts of the Saturn 5, the Soyuz and the Space shuttle.
Wait wait wait, I thought you said shielding for the radiation was needed. If i misread and you didn’t say that then I’m saying it.
You’ve gotta provide protection from uninhibited solar radiation inside the capsule and on the surface, and to my knowledge the capsule and the standard suit provide none of that. Theres also no cooling whatsoever save for a small inner lander air circulator and a water based battery operated cooling system In the suit. Both the suit and the capsule would heat up like a convection cooking pot and burn everyone inside alive taking on that much solar radiation.
Literal lunacy.
I’m fine with the crackpots and the conspirazoids as long as you put an oar in when and where it matters. But now you’re spooking me out.
If you can’t even wield Occam’s razor on this one, as Greg suggests above, then what can you apply it to?
Oh well, I suppose this is the kind of company one must make peace with on the margins, where talk of real conspiracies blend with the others, where it is safe to speak truth among the discounted noise.
But can we all pledge to destroy feminism before we break out the moonbats? And when we get the enemy to their surrender parley, let me do the talking.
Oh shit yo, I be walking thru the hood sometime and I see all the real thug brothas gettin all the pussy and lonely ole me with no pussy whatsoever. Definitely the case that society is becoming more sociopathic, beta black males of my fathers generation got laid, beta blacks of mine dont.
Is “the pussy” a definite description?
Why is that? I thought drug dealing and other “alpha” shit paid off better back then. But I don’t claim to know.
“How I hacked online dating”, some interesting ideas there, general approach if not details. Making fake accounts to do market research. According to her it worked.
I saw that video.
She only found a good man after she created a more feminine more traditional profile
It is as if she had followed CH’s advice
I finally figured out why Ted Talks suck.
They are so over produced they seem phony despite their sometimes interesting content.
In addition, they don’t allow questions. I always carry around a big bag of monkey wrenches just for these kinds of presentations.
You can’t out monkey the monkey,
monkey.
They have become formulaic ( a new word I learned recently, English is not my first language )
Don’t you mean *normulaic*?
Hyuck. (pause) Hyuck. (pause) (swallows a bullet)
[…] Under what conditions would women swoon for sociopaths? Very harsh conditions, for one. An emotionle… […]
“the exciting cad.”
Psychopaths aren’t exiting cads. They have no conscience and they are incapable of love. Some have a superficial charm, but they quickly creep out most men and women. Only the truly disturbed fall of them – think Manson and his “family.”
A psychopath named Dale Anderson (who is unattractive) strangled to death a tiny woman I worked with. He murdered a pregnant woman. He threw a woman he had strangled on the side of the road. He got a hard-on over these things, which happens with all murderous psychopaths. When the police were investigating him, he ran and hid behind his wife.
I was raised with these people – murderers and rapists. That’s the violent ones. The non-violent ones are rarely successful in life unless they’re parasites on the productive.
They are not warriors. They are cowards. They are not protectors and providers, even the non-violent. And they cannot be explained by evolutionary theory, no matter how hard people twist the facts to fit their pet theories..
Recruiting for the military would surely select for this. After all you want those that will shoot to kill. Perhaps better those that shoot to maim.
Police too these days.
Being tall, good-looking, young, rich and high-status doesn’t make you a ‘sociopath’.
Just sayin.
This blogs’ ideas are fundamentally un-american