Watch this video of a man and a woman, respectively, dropping a mickey in their dates’ drinks.
When the man attempts to drug his date, a mongrel horde of white knights descends upon him to break him on the wheel. But when the woman does the same to her date… crickets. Not a stir among the white knight brigade to defend from bodily harm the man who is the victim of her mickey. Only one person — a woman — steps up to tell the guy that his date put a pill in his drink.
This is all unsurprising to Chateau regulars who are familiar with the fundamental premise governing human sociosexual dynamics.
Interestingly, this reluctance to come to a man’s aid (relative to the eagerness to do so for women) is why men’s same-sex friendships are so much deeper and more meaningful than women’s same-sex friendships. When a man has earned another man’s true friendship, their loyalty can last for decades, through the worst tribulations. Women’s friendships are, by way of contrast, quite a bit more… how shall we say?… gossipy and fickle.
This is the reason why women invent terms like “BFF”, (Best Friend Forever). When you can’t really count on your friends to be there, you artificially pump the value of your friendships with branding exercises that allow you and them to think the relationship is more profound than it is. Men have no need for such verbal calisthenics, because a man’s close friends have earned their place in his world by their action, not by their word. His loyal male friends are presumed BFFs. No marketing or product branding required.
lzozozozo owen womensz have no HONOR which is why da ebenrnakesiferes put dem in power zlzozolzi
Lots of people talk and few of them know,soul of a woman was created below.
Every day I work so hard, bringin’ home my hard earned pay, Try to love you baby, but you push me away.-
LED ZEPPELIN – DAZED AND CONFUSED LYRICS
Da Reason Dey Banned da GREAT BOOKS 4 MENZ is dat da GREAT BOOKZ teach of the true nature of WOMENZ and da HONOR OF MEN.
HOMER TEACHES:
You have to watch out [20] She doesn’t carry off all your treasure. You know what a woman’s heart is like. She wants to enrich the house of the one who weds her, Never mind about her former children And the husband she once loved. Once he’s dead, [25] She doesn’t give any of them a thought. –Homer; Lombardo, Stanley; Murnaghan, Sheila (2010-07-02). Odyssey (Translated & Annotated) (Kindle Locations 6813-6817). Hackett Publishing. Kindle Edition.
lzozoozozlzozoz dat is because a owmenz is gudied by materialz insticnstinct and mater = mother = matter = material you fanabaoyz zlzloolzolzoz. DA ANCIENTZ KNEW IT–all dat da bernnkeifierz conceal and hidez as tehy d create false LAWS allowing womenz to arbitrarily transfer a man’s property and chirlederen to da state zlzlzlooz!!!
lzozozozozo
lzozozozozozoz
lzozoozozozo
zlzoozozozozoz
lzoziziozlzoz
lzozozozozo
Kinduva stoopid question, but what powder would a woman want to drop in a man’s drink?
Powdered viagra? Powdered cialis?
Or are we talking about one of these whores who drugs the john so that she can steal his wallet and his smart phone and his rolex?
Shut up.
I can’t wait to hear how a woman coming to a man’s aid—to tell him that his drink has been drugged without his knowledge—is proof that women have no honor.
Extra points will be given if you can provide one single case of any of your Great Books ever having been banned in the United States. One.
What the fuck are you talking about? The trash you spew is insane.
So because ONE girl helps a guy somehow that makes the situation equal?
Also how utterly delusional that you think books have not be banned. You can pick just about any book and find somewhere it has been banned.
Let me break this down for you:
1. CH posts a video in which a woman drugs a man’s drink. None of the men around help him. A lone woman does.
2. GBFM posts one of his copypastas stating that a) women have no honor, and b) the “Great Books for Men” are being banned everywhere.
3. This is despite the fact that a) the video demonstrates a woman who is behaving with honor, and b) none of his “Great Books” have been banned anywhere in the United States.
That is what the fuck I am talking about. Try to keep up.
Wow, she really through the gauntlet down.
I’m just not sure why she’s taking GB4M so seriously.
She not only through the gauntlet down, she also threw it down.
He was probably referring to women being backstabbing bitches towards each other.
he’s a force of nature. best to just enjoy the best bits like the songs and his exchange with a particularly unfeminine woman the other day. get in a fiht with him and the comments thread will be miles long
Force of nature, my heart-shaped arse. He copies and pastes the same six walls of text and the same four YouTube clips into every single thread. Even if you thought it was brilliant the first time—and I would argue that to do so is really more an example of pareidolia than anything else—surely you must be getting a bit tired of it by Number 1,000.
I think Rollo says it best, women “fight/compete” in the covert psychological domain, men “fight/compete” in the overt, physical domain. When women “fight” in the overt they have exhausted their options…. It would appear RappaccinisDaughter has exhausted her options, posting here….. she’s just itchin for a tangle…..
The reason no one reads his blog is that he sucks, so instead he shitposts here, with a combination of copypasta and lozolozoloolozzolloz.
One woman helps one man one time (hey dude someone put something in your drink) and suddenly the average woman has honor.
The experiences of most men with most women throughout the ages are now completely invalidated.
Wow.
Now try to get your average woman to honor a commitment she made a week ago.
I love how this hamster says “try to keep up” like she actually said something intelligent.
First, I’d like to invite you to refer to yesterday’s CH post for the definition of “wow.”
Second, I request that you show me where I said that the video invalidated anyone’s experiences. (If you feel it will help you in your search, I can show you where I said that the video invalidated GBFM’s point. You know, for process of elimination.)
Thirdly, I eagerly await your proof that the average woman cannot be relied upon to honor commitments she made a week ago.
Nah, I really don’t care about CH definition. You tried to use this video as evidence that women have honor.
Sorry but most men know most of ya’ll don’t.
There is no proof of anything needed, this is not a courtroom. This is about shared experiences and we all know what shared experiences we have here.
Nice try though.
We’ll continue discussing as free men.
I’ll admit I don’t have any honor. However, there are a lot of men I don’t think much of either. All men are not the same. Not even close.
lzozozozozlzozzoo
zlzolzozozoozlzozozo
Did you even feel a breeze when my point sailed over your head? Because I don’t think it so much as parted your hair.
@Lara
This is true; many men don’t have honor, not just women. That’s why as a woman you better make sure he possess those qualities you like before you take the plunge. That’s why dating for a while before you sleep with him is best. I think honor in a man makes him more alpha than being a weasel.
Rapp, “why-men-dont-have-bffs” has nothing to do with Israel, yet GBFM keeps posting unrelated shit, obviously because he’s a loser and he needs to stir the pot to make himself feel better. Why else?
Is that making you feel better?
It’s not compulsory to go through all his posts if you don’t like them, you know?
Believe me I don’t. I used to skip them. But lately, he posts dozens per thread, which just get people sidetracked and distracted, instead of focusing on the subject of the thread.
Hell, some threads have 90% Jew-bashing comments, and just 10% game comments. It’s hard no not notice.
Well you can’t put them all on him. Others do participate in those too.
RP, normally I just scroll past ‘em. Today I opened the post when there were 2 comments posted. The video is approximately 10 minutes long, and the text took me about 2 minutes to read. In those 12 minutes, GBFM had copied and pasted about 12 videos and posts, none of which were original content (let alone coherent or on-topic). So, just for today, I made an exception.
I’m done now, though. I’m kind of starting to feel bad, like I made fun of the kids who ride the short bus.
eve ran striaght for da serpent lotas cockas snake sperepent lostas cockas seperpent snake snakey snake lotssa cockas!
9 And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?
10 And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.
11 And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?
12 And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.
13 And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, 2 Cor. 11.3 and I did eat.
14 ¶ And the LORD God said unto the serpent,
Because thou hast done this,
thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field;
upon thy belly shalt thou go,
and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:
15 and I will put enmity between thee and the woman,
and between thy seed and her seed;
it shall bruise thy head,
and thou shalt bruise his heel.
16 Unto the woman he said,
I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception;
in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children;
and thy desire shall be to thy husband,
and he shall rule over thee.
and so you see why da benrnakifiers banned HOMER & THE BIBELES ZLzozlzlzlzolz
lzozozozo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkM6bA6pDXE
da frankfureter schoolz zzozlzozlzizlzozoz “Western society is morally decaying not by chance, but rather, BY DESIGN.”
lzozozozozo
lzozozozozolz
lzlzozozozozozo
“Banned” in this context doesn’t mean outlawed. Stop being deliberately obtuse. It means the books are ignored by the education establishment and everywhere else. You know, the education establishment that once taught courses explicitly called “Great Books” courses. The education establishment that once had a defined canon of classic works of Western literature (nearly all written by white males) and fed them to eager young minds.
Well all of that has been tossed on the scrap heap, and instead of Homer we get “I, Rigoberta Menchu” or whatever other piece of multi-cultie, Commie trash they are propagandizing with this week. Even when they still teach Shakespeare it gets filtered through the usual grievance pant-wetting. Oh look at the sexist-racist-homoist subtext of the text!
You don’t have to legally proscribe something to effectively “ban” it.
Yes, you do have to legally proscribe something to ban it. That is the definition of “ban.” Words mean things.
In addition to not being banned, the “Great Books” are indeed still taught. It’s no longer universal, but that’s in part due to the fact that literacy rates are so low that they’re beyond the skills of many high-school students. Which is absolutely a problem of great significance, but it’s not a conspiracy.
lozozozozoz
lzozozzolozzol
Congratulations. You’ve actually posted a sober and rational discussion between William F. Buckley and Allan Bloom about the role of affirmative action in higher education. What you have not done, however, is show me a single instance of a “Great Book” being banned in the United States, or indicated how CH’s video or accompanying text underscored your belief that women have no honor.
lozztas caococaks 4u zlzlzolzo lzoizzlz
Somehow I doubt that.
lzozooz
BEAUTY WILL SAVE DA WORDZLSZ!
BOOTY WILL SAVE DA GBFMZ ZLZozozizlz
lzozozozozo
lzozozlzzol dudmmd dudmm dmdumdmd stoppidz beatchz hey ho ho zlozlzoz
Hey Hey Ho Ho Western Culture Is Gone
Or, maybe it should be called “Intended Consequence.”
from “http://countenance.wordpress.com/2006/09/28/hey-hey-ho-ho-western-culture-is-gone/”
“InsideBayArea.com:
They may be attending some of the best universities in the world, but students at UC Berkeley and Stanford don’t know much about history, according to a study released Tuesday.
Neither, apparently, do students at many other universities.
A study of more than 14,000 randomly selected freshmen and seniors at 50 colleges found that students scored poorly on a series of multiple-choice questions designed to test their general knowledge of American history, government, foreign affairs and the economy.
Students were given 60 multiple choice questions on wide-ranging topics in American history, from the Founding Fathers to the Persian Gulf War. At UC Berkeley, freshmen averaged 60 percent on the test, while seniors scored 55 percent. Stanford’s numbers were slightly higher, with freshman averaging 62 percent, and seniors averaging 63 percent.
The study rated UC Berkeley second from last in a ranking it created that assigns a “learning rank” to schools based on students’ scores. Berkeley was one of 16 universities, many of them among the most prestigious, that earned a “negative learning” rank because freshmen scored higher than seniors. UC Berkeley earned a negative 5.6, followed only by Johns Hopkins University, with a negative 7.3.”
-from http://countenance.wordpress.com/2006/09/28/hey-hey-ho-ho-western-culture-is-gone/
zkzozlzizzlzoizlzo
It’s also why men don’t usually use words like “best” to describe their friendship, using words like “oldest” or just “good” instead. I have men who have been my friends for 40 years or longer, and we don’t even have to verbalize our friendship, let alone quantify it. In fact, verbalizing it would make us all uncomfortable.
As for invented terms like “bromance”… ugh .Words fail me.
bromance and those kinds of things, maybe a guy made it up (?) but i doubt it. i think it’s a way to attempt to minimize male friendship, women are almost universally threatened by it.
try a test. next time girls go to coffee together– you feel like calling them lesbos? no, me neither. but do something with another guy and tell your girl(s) about it, you will get a lot of “how was your gay date” or similar.
i’m closer to anonymous male disqus posters that ask for advice than most girls are to each other.
Bromance seems to have been intentionally coined in order to ghettoize straight men. The thought seems to me to be “See? Even straight guys fall in love with each other” or some such bilge. It reeks of a marketing created word.
Agree with Kim du Toit on the “best” label. My friends of decades length don’t need me to describe our friendship, nor do I need them to qualify our friendship in such terms to others. Friend itself seems to encapsulate all that’s required, between men, if it’s spoken at all.
It subtly insinuates that there is something wrong with men who sometimes pursue activities that don’t include women.
This!
I think the irony here is that men are more sensitive of the perfectly rational logic that, if you call one person your best friend, then you are insulting others. In a woman’s world, many people can be “best”, at which point the word ceases to have meaning.
yeah ‘besties’ oh man. i do have a best friend, essentially like another brother. but i don’t generally say it to other people, he knows and i know and we don’t need to tell strangers. i can express his good qualities to them if they apply to the situation, but lord save me from all these made up words.
How is this double standard related to how society treats men and women in general (aka the fundamental premise), lead to the conclusion of men having deeper relationships with friends????
i didn’t get that segue either but i agree with both of his points. just not seeing where the video leads to the friendship stuff
Because men can’t rely on strangers or superficial relationships as much as women can. If you’re a pretty girl you can get some idiots to do pretty much anything for you, help you move, provide you a place to stay, lend you money etc.. It doesn’t work that way between men unless there’s some deeper bond.
thank you that does make sense. everytime i see your username i think of lloyd bonafide on phil hendrie sheepishly admitting that he was the original hugh g rection in a series of stag films
I’ve noticed that female acquaintances at work try to say we are friends when we don’t see each other outside of work.
I think they use this to get men to do things for them.
Doesn’t work on me, I will say “no, we are not friends. We do not spend time together outside of the office”.
They don’t really know what to do after that but it’s not my problem.
I think the term friend has been diluted pretty well by Facebook and similar sites.
Girls are trite, and would slit each others throat in a second. MOST males are not that much different, especially when sex is on the table, but a few men indeed can have very deep, true friendship.
lozozozoozo
zlzozoozozozoz
lzozozozoz
zlozozozozoz
Hey CH, you mind checking for my FR’s? The ones I posted over the weekend haven’t shown up. I think they caught in the spam folder.
hey hunter….I thought you might want to save your FR’s in a word doc and paste into the comment section. This way if a posting is caught up in the spam filter, you can re-paste the report rather than re-typing it!
Thanks for the tip, Naz. I did that with my Friday one. Might have to rewrite Saturday’s tho.
Same issue here. Have tried copying and pasting several times re Friday night but none are posting.
They just distract from important discussions about the Hebrews.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/female-friends-spend-raucous-night-validating-the,27446/
that was beautiful
jeez…I just tried to post the same thing in response. I thought it complements the bff thing pretty well.
so here’s the males parallel…
http://www.theonion.com/video/area-man-unsure-if-hes-malebonding-or-being-bullie,33919/?playlist=onion-special-report
I don’t know what best friends are, but there are a couple of faggots I hang out with a lot.
Maybe a WOMAN has honor but definitely not women.
You already know the very second gossip and rumors start, even the most professional strict ladies degenerate and debauch tehmselevs in a cacophony of scandal.
Rappacini, I’m not even going to go the YaReally route.
You’re more of a tomboy/man so that’s internalized.
So I’ll just ask a few questions.
Which gender did not spread their legs wide open and fought for their national identity when foreign threats came about? Which one DID spread their legs with barely a fight?
Which gender clings on to self-aggrandizingnotions like “being complicated” as opposed to being congruent? Which gender despises simplicity and goodness and humble hardworking honorable traits?
Which gender is vehemently nastily opposed to any kind of “black and white” thinking?(Ayn rand witholding)
Which gender shows a thorough consistency in thought through many of their years despite external influences? Which one is easily influenced and malleable?
Which gender is more prone to chasing philosophies and ethics to reign the foundations of their life? Which gender is more prone to disregarding higher cerebral superego-esque thoughts in favor of status, fun, popularity, vanity, security, love and other traits?
Which gender is more prone to acting the same way when they are alone in comparison to when others are looking at them?
Which gender derives less pleasure from slander and character assassinations?
Which gender is more apt to show compassion to a homeless man or a misunderstood person if that person has NO BENEFIT to them (yes public displays of one’s image enhanced generosity count as a benefit)
Which gender actually gets THRILLS from infidelity as opposed to simply a means to getting sexual relief?
Which gender considers sacrificing themselves for their spouse to be foolish and unreal? Which gender finds great moral courage in doing such?
…. Do I need to fukking go on?
They say that the use of a logical fallacy invalidates an argument. I say there are situations in which it doesn’t. For example, the argumentum ad hominem has a valid application: If a known pedophile is arguing for the revocation of age-of-consent laws, his status as a pedophile is relevant.
No, I’m not calling you a pedophile. This is mere preamble to my response, which is going to consist almost entirely of “tu quoque.” However, in a discussion about “which is better—man or woman,” the tu quoque is valid.
For example:
“Which gender did not spread their legs wide open and fought for their national identity when foreign threats came about? Which one DID spread their legs with barely a fight?”
Neither of them. The Vichy government was run by men, not women. The only reason why their cowardice wasn’t matched by actual fraternization is because the Nazis weren’t particularly interested in buggery.
“Which gender actually gets THRILLS from infidelity as opposed to simply a means to getting sexual relief?”
Both of them. If you don’t believe me, please refer to any comment thread on CH in which men brag about “plate-spinning.” How many of them are YaReally-types, who’ve been open and honest with the women in question about the relationship not being exclusive?
“Which gender derives less pleasure from slander and character assassinations?”
Neither of them. Men love to gossip and spread lies as much as women do. They just tend to use a shorter wordcount.
None of your examples works as evidence that men are inherently more honorable than women. Lies, deceit, thievery, hypocrisy, self-aggrandizement, self-preservation at any price…these are a regrettable part of the human condition, not part of any gendered construct.
In short, most people suck. Our best bet is to find as many as we can who suck the least and spend as much of our time as we can not putting them to the test.
Actually, tu quoque doesn’t work because the status/motivations of the individuals in the argument do not diminish the logical points they may make in the argument. Their interest is already presumed to be on the side of the argument they are taking, ergo, tu quoque is a non-sequitur as well as being a form of ad hominem. That’s why logical fallices do not work and are not applicable. If they applied to the argument, they wouldn’t be a fallacy.
I can see why women would want them to be valid, since they lead into shaming techniques, but that doesn’t mean that the use of tu quoque invalidates the actual argument(s) themselves.
I actually enjoy your point of view, whether I agree with it or not, it’s good to see intellectual rigor being applied, even on topics with which I disagree.
Slainte
Tu quoque works in this particular situation because his argument is “Men are better than women because women do X and men do Y.”
My response is, “No, men are not better than women, because they both do X and Y.”
That’s just doubling down on the fallacy. A better response that would actually work without invoking tu quoque would be to show statistics/numbers that demonstrate that the claims are incorrect. So for example, following up with “No, men are not better than women, because they both do X and Y at a similar rate” and then supplying data would work; but without data the actual assertion(s) and counter-assertions are meaningless exercises in non-logic equally dependent on the same fallacy they are trying to counter. In short, rhetorical madness.
Tu quoque answered by tu quoque is little more than playground fussing about whose dad can beat up the others dad. In neither case are facts or logic present, and the argument boils down to emotionalism aka Pathos. That may be fine for the school yard fight, but it serves no functional purpose.
Or best put, two wrongs do not make a right. A fallacy is a fallacy is a fallacy, and if it’s a fallacy it fails by definition, even if its used as a counter to the fallacy of somebody else.
I think my computer is tired of me typing the word “fallacy”, heh.
Oh Razzle dazzles, how do you actually gain praise for talking like this? How is it that I do not win any fans for pointing out potential flaws in logic?
srs question.
Nice bikini. Is that you in real life? If so, I might deign to admire your ability to craft sound rhetorical arguments. Heh.
Burninator’s the only one praising right now, femx, and that’s more of the “damning with faint praise” variety than anything else.
Also, Burninator, WordPress just cockblocked my last four replies to you.
Yeah, that’s me in the flesh.
“If so, I might deign to admire your ability to craft sound rhetorical arguments. Heh.”
Like for real? As in appeal to flattery + false attribution, my appearance in a bikini has no relevance to the validity of my arguments?
No damning at all, just pointing out the problem with your argument. Me, I would have pointed out the fallacy he made at the start, or at least consulted him for data to back up his assertions.
More guidance than damning, not that you asked for it nor care about my opinions on your offerings of course. I’m not particularly fond of passive aggressiveness, to be straight on the point. If I want to insult you, I’ll do so outright. Keeps everything nice and simple and direct.
The WordPress selectivity with posts is a bit of a crap sandwhich at times, I usually try to copy what I’ve written before I Post Comment. Sometimes that doesn’t even work, when I try to post again if it doesn’t show up I get “You already posted that”, which is a clear and blatant lie given as it hasn’t shown up. So yeah, I feel for ya’ on that point.
“Burninator’s the only one praising right now, femx, and that’s more of the “damning with faint praise” variety than anything else.”
Meh. I can’t afford to maintain standards that high. My game is not yet at that level or something.
@Fem
It was a joke. I was shamelessly flirting with you in that case, as at heart I am indeed a square jawed cad with cruel yet handsome eyes. I haven’t seen your actual arguments yet on any given thread, or better put, if I’ve seen them I’ve been caught up responding to others. For all I know you advocate mixing orange juice and toothpaste together as a great breakfast drink, or even worse, you may well implore others to watch Pauly Shore movies which I think most would agree would be a horror beyond horror. I really have no way of knowing at this time.
Burninator,
My comment was also in jest. Here’s to hoping that my personality seems less square than your jaw.
yea fem that shit is looking pretty good now must be the red
You’re impressive. I like the way you write and think.
Thanks Odysseus. I admire the great job you did during the Trojan War and how you really took it to Ajax.
The internet is probably the last place I choose to display any intellectual leanings. Real life doesn’t care in the least, so I mostly hang out and ride with other bikers. Not the most intelligent cast of characters, but most of them are direct and honest to a fault, as well as generally being real “alpha males” without having to take lessons off of websites or classes. In this day and age you have to pick and choose your associations where you can.
I don’t think you understand the rationale behind plate-spinning. It isn’t for thrills or bragging rights, it’s done mostly out of necessity for a sexual market that has more or less been defined by women. It’s the male response to hypergamy, if you will.
I don’t think there is a rationale behind plate-spinning, other than the one about why a dog licks his balls.
So you haven’t actually read anything about it. That’s all you should’ve said.
No, I’ve read several posts about it. The point is to have sex with as many women as you can, because you can.
I think ya have to do it with hot chicks it is what it is
keeps them focused on you instead of externals he he he
“Men love to gossip and spread lies as much as women do. They just tend to use a shorter wordcount.”
This can’t be supported by anyone who has any basic observational skills whatsoever.
You should read up on some evo-psych. Men aren’t affected by sexual reputation damage that women are, so thus have never had the need to develop the verbal attack and defense mechanisms that compromise gossip.
A woman tearing a rival down can get her a leg up in the sexual market, but the same dynamic doesn’t work for men. (Or if anything, it works in their favor.)
They gossip and lie about different things. No, you can’t hurt your rival’s chances with women by calling him a slut. But you can hurt him by spreading the tale about the emo poem he wrote for his ex-girlfriend.
tl;dr
Good comment. A lot of men really aren’t that great or admirable. Some women can be. It just depends on the person.
Why don’t men help out the guy whose drink was drugged? It is a reasonable question. Men help out women because they subconsciously think it could lead to sex. Guys may be better than women but that video doesn’t prove it.
Most people just don’t give a shit about men, that naturally includes men. Men are expendable. Something happens to a man and many think that on some level he deserves it.
Serious questions here, this is not a subject I’m particularly well versed in, so excuse my ignorance.
There are date rape drugs for *men*? Or are the generic “roofies” something that a man can get an erection while being under the influence of? As I said, I have very little medical knowledge of such things. I did once have two girls joke that they were going to put roofies in my drink when my back was turned, however, I clearly saw that as a joke and thought “um, yeah, sure”. Is it for real (not their teasing, rather the concept)? Anybody know of any men who have been drugged in the manner? I’m quite curious.
If a woman was drugging a man’s drink, it wouldn’t be for sex. Revenge, robbery, humiliation all come to mind.
Fair point Sad Clown, I hadn’t considered that. My general assumption is that most all women want me in bed, so things like revenge never came to mind, lol.
Seriously, that is an interesting point though. I wonder what others have to say about it?
I suppose it could also be a nefarious means of getting pregnant, but I’ve never heard of a case. And then I’d ask the same question about getting hard.
Always humours me when women make claim to;
1) only being able to get on with men / men are easier to get on with.
2) having hardly any female friends.
3) claiming women are always bitchy.
The true interpretation (in respective order to the above) to women of this nature is;
1) they cannot tolerate sharing attention with other girls.
2) they are jealous of being in the company of a hotter woman.
3) they have no ability to talk about anything or any subject beyond the parameters of their own existence.
I would always be suspicious of a woman who lays down her innocence that, when she can’t get on with other women, it is because they allegedly don’t like her. This is her back-handed self-compliment way of saying women are jealous of her. And of course, the majority of men fall for it.
I don’t think other women are jealous of me, but they can still be hard to get along with. In small doses, they are great company, but I’d never want to live with one.
The show “What Would You Do?” is beyond the pale in setting up phony teachable moments to denigrate decent heterosexual whites. Have they produced a single episode of a white person being treated badly in black contexts? Would that some target of Chris Hanson or Juan Cinones prissy, moralizing sting operations lash out and cut their fucking throats.
Furthermore , any enterprise that colludes with ABC to scrutinize random patrons for possible thought-crimes through one of these insulting contrivances should be boycotted out of business. When I dine out I expect my privacy to be respected. Imagine being secretly video-taped to get your possibly non-compliant reaction to some phony homo-erotic or racial incident.
relating to bff…
http://www.theonion.com/articles/female-friends-spend-raucous-night-validating-the,27446/
Lololzzzz 80% (!!!!!!!!!) of Jews aggressively promote the faggot agenda. Even more than the % who are democrats. Lololzzzz.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/10/01/america-jews-religion-jewish/2900871/
Hmmmmmmm
Also 100% admit that Jewishness is a race and tribe having nothing at all to do with Judaism the religion.
And this has to do with dropping mickies in drinks…how precisely?
Shut up.
It is only natural. Women lack the neuronal structures to develop impersonal bonds. It is a survival mechanism, which I will explain.
For around 200,000 years, men had to trust each other during hunting expeditions and/or war. Betrayal meant death by hunger, battle or predators, either for one or all. Distrust among males meant the exile or death of the traitor, in order to benefit the group.
Women had to think into personal short-term survival, lacking the physical strenght to fight. That is why they developed gossip, lies and deceit in order for their offspring to had a chance for survival; never hesitating to betray the group, other women and even his offspring’s father (war brides).
The rest, is history. To this day, women, as a group, can only consume resources and make short-term goals; while men, as a group, can produce and make long-term goals. A prime example is that men formed armies, corporations, religions, guilds and gangs, while women have so far been unable to do so.
Rollo made a variation of your argument in his article War Brides, I believe.
Credit goes to Rollo. I used his idea.
You took the words out of my mouth. I used to wonder why the male teachers at the “female dominated” school, I taught in, seemed so tight lipped….After awhile you catch on.
Right. All day spent tending children and gathering berries enabled a lot of airtime for chicks to shoot the shit with one another. Basically superfluous communication when compared to men out hunting and fighting who actually had to focus their communication on the task at hand so as to not die.
What a phantasmagoric load of crock!
You sir are a waste of cum.
Aren’t we all?
Phantasmagoric story, still phantasmagoric.
The need for a neat, simple story to explain how we’re got here. Such a pussy b/o need. Let’s indulge it, shall we?
We’re the vanguard of mankind fighting back the undead libtard hordes. We are in an life-or death confrontation with the BLOB. The other side controls the mightiest propaganda apparatus and the largest weapons arsenal in the history of mankind, and we’re gonna be motivated by some silly-ass fairy tale?
Are U guys out of you minds?
Sounds like a big fight. Write me a postcard if you get out of it alive.
CH – you didn’t even mention the best part of this video…
In the last scene, once the female date-raper interacted with the other female present “as a woman… we’re on a first date”… the second female appears to act on jealousy motives to protect the guy.
dingdingdingdingding
prettier, younger…. “biiiiiitch”
she could of also been trying to make him fail a drug test fuck up his job
funny that two chicks said the chick that was driving my truck was trying to kill me
she did say i hate white boys right before she pulled out and accelerated into the metal pole lol
umm
so maybe ya can overgame these things
i didn’t tell the chicks that though they just came out from beginning bitch was trying to kill me wtf
i did tell her i was bout to drive out to see chick from back in school so yea can’t now unless i get rental but yea dam fuck
then chick from country talking bitches are crazy no not her but yea woman and one of em gonna end up killin me and shit
Murder Game?
got some new shit comin out now
well actually i have seen this played a dif way but yea
she didn’t get the two grand on me so wasn’t robbin me
battery from cellphone was out and phone back together and my house key was off ring in truck lol
aww she must like me hahahahaahahahahaha
isen’t that sweet when they like you enough they try to kill you they so innocent and pure and good
i didn’t tell the chicks that though they just came out from beginning bitch was trying to kill me wtf””””””
and does that mean those bitches think about killing me wtf is going on that they would say that
didn’t say accident didn’t say she was drunk didn’t come up with excuses said she was trying to kill me
DAM WTF
After being out all night, a woman comes home early one morning smelling of booze and cheap cologne. Her boyfriend asks her where she has been all night and she says that she got too drunk to drive last night so she stayed at her best friends house until she was able to drive. Suspecting her of cheating, her boyfriend makes a list of her 10 best friends and calls each one of them. Out of the 10, NONE of them say she stayed there last night, and some of them even say they havent seen her in weeks, how is she doing?
New scenario:
After being out all night, a man comes home early one morning smelling of booze and cheap perfume. His ol lady asks him where he has been and he says that he got too drunk to drive last night and stayed at his best friends house until he was able to drive. Suspecting him of cheating, his ol lady then makes a list of his 10 best friends and calls each one of them. Out of the 10, ALL 10 says Yes, he did stay here last night and 2 of them even say that he is still there on the couch.
+1
“Out of the 10, ALL 10 says Yes, he did stay here last night”
I’m Spartacus!
In the same vein, the old one:
A friend (woman) will come bail you out of jail.
A buddy will turn to you in the cell and say, “Man, we sure @#$%ed up this time!”
I think there’s also the factor that if a man gets a mickey, most people are thinking, “Da-n, it’s his lucky day!” “Nice, he’s gettin’ laid tonight!” whereas for a woman, people think “Beta loser trying to fertilize her eggs without her consent, better intervene!”.
I think most people would assume that he was going to get robbed, and not give a shit.
OT but here is an interesting Vanity Fair article on teenage sex and the internet. Seems like some of the young men have a lot of game. The thoughts of the young females reveal much about their personal hamsters.
http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2013/09/social-media-internet-porn-teenage-girls
Hm, I dunno about this one. I read somewhere that men tend to have large networks filled with shallower relationships, whereas women tend to have smaller networks with more meaningful relationships. Now, that said…it’s easy for me to believe that if you looked at the relationship between two male best friends and two female best friends, the male relationship would probably contain more loyalty.
But then again, that depends on who you roll with. If you gain the respect and trust of a high value male — then ya, they are your friend to the end. Admirable, unadmirable….alphas seem to be there with you (after you earn the respect and trust).
It just seems like betas/omegas are more shifty in their friendships/alliances. But that’s kind of unfair…they’re just a different type of friend. They lack the ability to stand up for themselves, so naturally, this extends to an inability to stand up for a friendship.
My experience differs. Men tend to have fewer but deeper relationships. Women want to be close to everybody they like, but this spreads them too thin, so they end up having more but shallower friends. Betas, if anything, are better friends than anybody else. That’s how they roll, this is why they try to pick up girls by being a good friend—they value loyalty a great deal.
Betas/Omegas are good friends when it’s one-on-one. But as soon as you’re out in the real world, they’re just pussies.
You roll with a crew of natural/alphas/whatever…what you get is a real ‘us vs the world’ vibe. You’re part of a tribe.
Betas are kinda just ‘well this is my friend, but I’m not going to put myself in a bad situ over it because I’m rational and blah blah blah.’
Ask yourself….if you were out with a beta and a random tried to instigate something with you, what would they do? What they’d do is wait until you handled it/situ was over/etc. and then, afterwards “oh man that sucks what happened, wow…” = pussy.
Strong people don’t do that. They’ll either back the person off, tell him to take a hike, etc. but they will make it VERY CLEAR that they have your back.
Weakness is weakness, and it’s fucking gay.
You are confusing the terms friendships and relationships. Men have larger networks of shallower connections for the good of business, society etc. These connections are based on merit alone.
Women have smaller networks based on things other than merit. Actually, mostly just personal politics of what suits them. These networks are their BFFs.
But when it comes to friendship and loyalty… men have that.
Like always, women are in the meatier part of the curve. Very large, very shallow relationships as well as small number of very tight friendships are both manly domains.
I think the saddest part of this that everyone is missing is that people want to drug each other in order to do nefarious things.
yea bitches will definitely try to get you started on drugs be careful out there guys
Fellows, let’s take a second and greet the the nice comrade propagandist that came to visit.
Hello comrade!
Hey, that’s Miss Propagandist to you, young man.
Comrade Angel, I trust all comrades in the Propaganda Direction of the Drug Enforcement Agency of our beloved federal governement are fine and well.
Please, give them our warmest wishes.
question for the chicks on here have you ever thought about killing a dude that you wanted but couldn’t have?
No.
I know a guy whom a woman tried to stab once. A scorned ex lover, he told us she was.
One of my best friends went down in flames when he finally got busted for embezzling huge sums of money to pay for nose candy. His being a fugitive from justice hasn’t really changed our friendship, except that I haven’t seen or heard from him since he went underground. If he showed up tomorrow, I’d stash him and help him on his way.
Girls, on the other hand, will throw a friend under a bus because her taste in fashion changes. “Can you believe that whore? She always wore flats like a decent human being, but I saw that whore wearing 6″ heels. Heels! I can’t believe I was ever friends with that whore! What a slut!,” my wife prattled one day. They’re no longer friends, because Amy wore high heels. Fucking shoes! Who could possibly give a fuck?!