
Is this an example of…
Where pretty lies perish.
This is the primary contention of men like Joe Jordan and Warren Balogh. They insist that the lib-con dichotomy is not just shopworn, but also a fake divide manufactured by jews, so when jews are exposed as the divisive element in White nations there will follow a coming-together of right-wing and left-wing Whites.
I remain skeptical of this theory, if only because there are real sociobiological and neural differences between temperamentally rightist and leftist Whites, but I agree that the situation we find ourselves in would improve dramatically if the first step is simply removing judeo-prop from our public discourse, and removing jewish influence over our politics and fiscal stewardship.
I'm sure the jews are hand-rubbing with glee that they have another sex war wedge to drive into the heart of the White race, but that doesn't mean the White woman sympathy for Clancy is faked or astroturfed.
Two things can be true at once: The social atomization and sexual liberation of modernity and collapsing empire are corrupting our women, and the jews are jewzzing to exploit another corrosive effect of modernity to make White collectivism impossible.
Environmentalism was traditionally a right-wing sentiment. It became lib-coded in the 20th century, when it was tied to leftoid shibboleths about colonialism, White racism, and White capitalist greed (which in turn made anti-environmentalism right-coded).
The potential exists for a right-left White alliance on the topic of environmentalism, but only if libwhites can pull the anti-racism scales from their eyes and accept that nonwhites are the primary despoilers of nature.
I doubt that ever happens, unless by some miracle judeo-propaganda evaporates from our culture like a dense choking zog-smog blown away with the prevailing winds.
I would say that if you're trying to get laid, arguing with her is the last thing a man should do. Arguing with these banshees online until they glitch is just good old-fashioned, spankin' fun.
That is not true. Or at least it is lacking any important context. Domestic violence rates are roughly the same between male and female perpetrators, but female victims tend to suffer more severe injuries because male perps are stronger.
Women, because of their smaller physical size, tend to resort more often to manipulative, emotional abuse that doesn't make for splashy headlines.
Beyond that correction, I have no clue what you're arguing here. Clancy murdered her kids. No one is arguing that men should have a monopoly on murdering their children, yet that appears to be what you are insinuating with your snarky man-hate.
What you evade is the real story, which is not Clancy herself. It is the outpouring of female support for her that is opening a lot of men's eyes to the foul, blackened hearts of too many of our modernity-soaked women.
Voter suppression is a healthy instinct in a multiracial empire.
We live in a judaicized culture where saying the nigger-word in a moment of justifiable anger gets the book thrown at you and a GoFundMe set up for the phone-stalking nigger, while murdering your three children results in a mass queefing of support for the murderess because she was on anti-depressents, had post-partum depression, and/or was driven to it by systemic misogyny.
If any of this is making you feel like the last normal person in the world, you're not alone.
Your economic policy preferences don't matter. The crucial distinction between right and left is race. And by your own account, you are a true believer in racial equalism and colorblindness, which makes you a leftist.
It's my belief that my big balls should be held every night🎶
Australia is a massive real world experiment in the limits of regression to the mean.
Australia began as a penal colony for obstreperous English Whites, but since they are White first and criminals second, over many generations their Australian descendants merged to the English White norm for civilized behavior.
But.....not all the way! The merger was, in a word, stopped a few rowdy DNA strands short, and you get intoxicated mates punching sharks in the face.
At this point, racialist Whites should hope that the midterms are a bloodbath for the establishment Dems to complement MAGA's fall from grace.
A pretty decent outcome would be a slew of hard left DSA brownoids winning their races, and making it clear to White America that they no longer hold the wheel on this runaway short bus.
Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.
Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.
Alternative Right
AmRen
Anonymous Conservative
Audacious Epigone
Dusk in Autumn
Education Realist
Evo and Proud
Gene Expression
Hail to You
Hawaiian Libertarian
Lion of the Blogosphere
My Posting Career
PA World and Times
Page for men
Parapundit
Rogue Health and Fitness
Steve Sailer
The Anti-Gnostic
The Kakistocracy
The Red Pill Review
Unqualified Reservations
Vox Popoli
West Hunter
Whiskey’s Place

Frame control/agree and amplify
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’d call it agree/amplify with assume the sale.
LikeLiked by 1 person
None of the above.
There should be a choice that says “No woman wants a man who talks to them like this and desire a man who respects an experienced and confident woman”
[CH: lol i hope you’re trolling]
LikeLiked by 2 people
hahahaha, good one scotty!
LikeLike
It really hits a few. He has the balls? to make the comment. She states he has ulterior motives for the comment. He doesn’t deny the motives, but negs her by his surprise she has a brain, amplifying his own good tastes.
LikeLike
See, this is another area where betas fail. It’s not bad to want to fuck her. It’s life. It’s the only reason why men and women even meet and speak to each other. She’s doing it too, but the shit test is a game they play.
He’s saying he’s proud to be a male and isn’t going to pretend to be a harmless teddy bear orbiter.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I predict a write-in groundswell for “pussy beggar, 2/10 would not bang, and anyway I can tell she’s a Jew.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
4th rule of CH comments: every 4th comment MUST point to how everything is related to Jews.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s because the Jews control the comments here.
LikeLike
Well shit, I can’t write that NOW
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shortest thread evah!
LikeLike
And I had some classics ready to roll, dammit.
LikeLike
I vote for ZFG
LikeLike
agree and amplify should be used as a way to say no ironically.
this is frame control with plain old flirting
LikeLiked by 2 people
It was a tossup for me between A&A or assumed sale. I went with A&A, but I really think it could’ve been both.
LikeLike
Definite A&A. Always been my specialty so I knows it whens I sees it.
LikeLike
Agree & Amplify: agree ok, amplify missing.
Reframe: would be something like “YOU only want to fuck with me, your are a men hunter, I will call the police”
Assume the Sale: would be something like “I am calling a cab for us now to go to my appartment”
Neg would be something like “you are not my kind for fucking”
Qualification would he be saying something related to how good he fucks
Congruence/Inner Frame would be passing a shit test like not accepting being blue balled or leaving if she misbehave
Answear: Generic Jerkboy Flirting
LikeLiked by 3 people
easy there Texas
LikeLike
A touch of non-defensiveness, Ignore and Plow
LikeLike
Dude’s totally looking down her shirt.
LikeLike
opening is direct ghetto game/beta game from 10 years ago(betas are too afraid of this now).
his response to her shit text is several thing:
“wow” is a neg, he didn’t think she was smart as well as cocky funny
zfg he owned it.
it is agree and amplify he agreed with her and amplified his assessment of her.
direct game as well, he wants to fuck her and has communicated it in two sentences
LikeLike
Congruence. It Doesn’t fit the bill for the other options. He maintains his frame, doewnt get nervous when she acuses him of being a pig, and returns with a somewhat sly, backhanded compliment. But its not a neg.
He maintains his frame, hence Congruency.
[CH: this is the most correct answer. Congruence aka Inner Frame. There’s a touch of agree & amplify and an implied “reverse” neg, but the overriding theme is congruence with a ZFG jerkboy attitude.]
LikeLike
It’s hard to judge in that narrow context. Reading the first statement made me cringe, but the follow up gave me a chuckle. It’s a good response to the “you just want to fuck me statement” (a very common test when you’re taking her to tingleland and skipping the line). Overall I would argue assuming the sale, because a guy with game doesn’t blurt of that line unless he is baiting for the test to then swat away. Second up would be A&A, but it really needs more of the prior exchange to make the determination.
LikeLike
But the compliment, it’sa bit much, almost AFC unless it’s coming from a natural who doesn’t care
LikeLike
Tough one. But I got it.
Who says I haven’t been paying attention.
LikeLike
I vote Qualification — he’s ‘qualifying’ her as:
1. Beautiful
2. [ pregnant pause to let her utter her predictable reaction / test ]
3. Smart
Overall it’s a congruent, flirty qualification gambit.
Underscored by a nice reframe “hey I’m a typical kiss-ass” => “Psyche!” of his own making.
Obviously dude was not thinking in these terms while likely improvising this exchange.
LikeLike
He was implicitly qualifying her with his response. Qualification assumes inner frame. Either answer is correct.
LikeLike
Her: You just want to fuck me?
The Don of sausage: Well, durrrrr, why else would we be speaking (cheeky grin).
A girl will only ever says the above if she is considering fucking you too. If you pass the tests.
LikeLike
Absostutely. If a girl is the first to mention sexytime, even obliquely, she wants your sausage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Disappointing poll results. This is not A&A, muh bros. It’s inner-frame/congruence.
His frame is boldly complimentary, so she tries to shame him, and he holds frame by complimenting her again. Her retort is dopey and obvious, so his second compliment could also qualify as a neg. A twofer.
A&A would be something like Yeah, you’ll be large with my child before midnight. I know it sucks, but as an example. And in that case she, not him, is determining frame.
LikeLike
It’s gotta be jerk boy to jump from compliment to pretty awesome zing.
LikeLike
I voted “generic jerkboy flirting”. He is having fun and doesn’t really care at all what she thinks or feels.
LikeLike
…most beautiful but with Cooties.”
Might have been the better retort line.
LikeLike
…a beauty only equalled by your narcissism.
LikeLike
…and smart, too. Do you prefer top or bottom?”
LikeLike
This would work with hb6.5 and below with very limited to no positive results above that.
[CH: wrong. it would work even better on the hotties, because they so infrequently experience this cocky attitude from men.]
LikeLike
Heard the same thing to me at some college party.
I raised my beer and responded: “I was born a Man!”
Worked like a charm.
Not as witty, but I always thought it was my confidence in who I was and what I wanted. I’ve heard guys respond with “no no no no I really just want “. And I always think, ‘Dude… you’re a guy. Everyone knows what you want.’
LikeLike