Once you know what to look for, that Satanic leftoid phyzz accosts you every day you check in with the media.
From a few Gabbers,
they both have 1 thing in common, besides being scum bag liars, they are both paid off via crowd funding bullshit. if anyone uses the argument ‘what could CBF possibly get out of this?’ you tell them, how about a million dollars that morons, and most likely democrats, again morons, have put in her go fund me. this is a scam and a farce.
***
This cannot be stated strongly enough. These crowdfunding sites are open bribe/money laundering institutions for leftists.
***
Crowdfunding, a secular second collection.
Why do psychotic leftoids smirk so much? (And in particular, why do their smirks looks so fucking deranged?)
I have a theory that it’s a combination of a number of traits that are manifest to pathological extremes in leftoids: Infantilism/arrested adolescence/neoteny/narcissism.
Also, the smirk is a very homophiliac expression which acts like a buffer between the surface emotion and the real authentic psychology underneath. I think these psychos smirk like that because it helps them conceal not only from others, but from themselves, the coal black darkness of their hearts and the malevolence of their motivations. They are lying, to you and to themselves (because the best liars first convince themselves of their honesty), and this creates a painful cognitive dissonance which the smirk helps alleviate by directing all the inner turmoil outward, against their perceived enemies.
Spot on CH, she also displayed duping delight. That is when someone smiles uncontrollably when they are lying. I hope she ends up behind bars and her so called lawyers loose their licenses to practice law. Although I sincerely doubt either of those things will happen…because vagina.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Also …because (((lawyers))).
LikeLiked by 2 people
You’re both right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Duper’s Delight
LikeLike
Kinda O/T from the essay, but in the Maryland of 1982, both “Assault” and “Attempted R@pe” were MISDEMEANORS with a ONE-YEAR statute of limitations!!!!! http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3691753/posts
LikeLiked by 3 people
It’s almost as though the Frankfurt School spent the last century or more trying to convince that The Ancestors didn’t actually know what they were doing.
Nah, that sounds way too conspiratorial.
I must be getting paranoid or something.
LikeLiked by 3 people
trying to convince US that…
LikeLike
interesting and under kav it got changed to no limit
LikeLiked by 1 person
The conduct she alleges does not fit the elements of either crime.
what she described as happening was just a boy tackling her and messing with her
LikeLiked by 2 people
Doesn’t matter dude. “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime.”
Let me tell you something, that MoCo District attorney is a fucking lying libtard weasel and will try to fuck this man in any way he can. Just like the state’s attn. for NY tried to fuck Trump.
This is what these people do. They will find a way to destroy him because they are moving en masse for that goal. That is why they are chomping at the bit and ready and waiting to ‘help’.
LikeLiked by 2 people
u think I don’t know man? After what I’ve been through in DC? lol
I was just pointing out that no crime was actually even committed, yet look at how this has morphed into “He tried to rape me”…bitch never even got her clothes off. Was not even actually touched sexually. And yet here we are talking about a crime??!
I see no solution- they won’t stop. it will be war.
LikeLiked by 4 people
That was aimed @ Cap because he clearly doesn’t ‘get it’ still. It doesn’t fucking matter what the statutes were in ’82.
No trav, one thing I’ll say about you, you’ve walked a mile in my shoes. Diff. circumstance (sex vs. violence) same outcome. Which is someone making up total shit and pointing a finger at you just like Kav is getting good and hard right now.
It isn’t and hasn’t been about ‘justice’ for a long long time. It is about wahmen and minorities getting one over on whitey and they are.
LikeLike
JnDC, my point was that as recently as 1982, in sh!tlibistan Maryland, the state legislators thought so little of “Attempted R@pe” that they couldn’t even be bothered to make it a fe1ony.
Are Ancestors understood that bishes lie through their teeth all the d@mned time [especially bishes who were mentally unstable to begin with].
And that absent compelling PHYSICAL evidence [presented to an Attending Physician in an Emergency Room], there was no compelling reason for LEOS to be bothered with pursuing this nonsense.
A drunken 17yo boy tried to cop a feel with a drunken 15yo girl – we’re gonna call out the National Guard for dat sh!znat?
Are Ancestors wouldn’t even have bothered to smirk or roll dey eyes at you.
LikeLiked by 2 people
USA Today Sports Section = Kavanaugh should stay away from basketball and kids
They are now taking the pedo route
LikeLike
Mel Gibsons Conspiracy Theory was ahead of its time
LikeLiked by 2 people
So, even if she HAD reported it, Kavanaugh would have gotten some kind of diversion/community service and it would been expunged off his record
after a very short time. So, IF it really happened, by not involving the legal system, she subverted the legal system AND shortchanged herself AND Kavanaugh.
And these dumb cvnts’ votes count as much as mine and yours.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually, him being 17, if he did give her a bit of a scare, odds are the parents would have had a stern sit-down and read him the riot act. If the police had gotten involved, they would have urged a family-to-family talk and apology, not putting something on record that would have ruined the kid’s future.
Even when stuff is expunged, it’s still in the databases somewhere and remains there when one is arrested. A simple background check might not divulge it, but deeper checks, like applying for gaming license, license to carry firearms, purchasing firearms, FBI and police applications, etc., etc., etc. will bring it to the fore.
LikeLike
Bottom-line, thought, is you’re right… if a woman actually was attacked, even in this relatively mild manner, she must report it to the aüthorities or just STFU ever thereafter.
In a sane world, you DON’T get to bring up decades old affronts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“neotony – the state resulting when juvenile characteristics are retained by the adults of a species” https://www.thefreedictionary.com/neotony
LikeLike
Turbo-chantards are floating the theory that it was ((( Amy ))) niece of ((( Chuckles ))) playing the nut-job. yesterday . We indeed live in interesting times indeed.
LikeLike
Well has anyone actually seen them in the same room? Why does she keep postponing her stage show in step with the hearings?
LikeLike
CH is right, but the tl/dr explanation is ‘We all know I’m lying and there’s nothing you can do about it’
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a VERY ODD COINCIDENCE that two Deep State hacks like Strzok [July 12th] and Balsey-Ford [Sept 27th] would make precisely the same bizarre facial expression [under oath] within less than three months of one another.
It reminds me of when all the Dykes – like Jodi Foster & Helen Hunt – started whistling their S’s [“whishling their Sh’sh”], back circa the late 1990s, around the time that Foster was making “Contact” and Hunt was making “As Good As It Gets”.
Then the Whishling Sh’sh spread to moar mainshtream femalesh, like Diane Shawyer and Leshlie Shtahl, on Shixshty Minutesh, and, before you knew it, guysh like Cuck Ryan shtarted whishling their sh’sh too.
I wonder whether that weird googly-eyed thing is what you have to make in order to gain entrance to an outfit like NXIVM or Comet Ping Pong Pizza.
Compare the Arch of Baal on the previous essay.
All I know is that no one but no one but no one behaved like this when I was a kid.
This shiznat is something new.
And very spooky [no pun intended].
LikeLiked by 1 person
Under some sort of hypnosis maybe.
LikeLike
Arch of baal lol. We will trust in Christ and get to fixing that problem, tout suite. What the enemy calls magick, and the autists call meme “magic”, we call Prayer. No matter how bad it gets, NEVER FORGET WHO IS IN CHARGE.
LikeLike
That said, Cap, you have a good point. I don’t remember that weird verbal tic being as prevalent when I grew up. I don’t know about you, but it feels like my ability to pick up on the odd shenanigans coming out of most public figures has increased exponentially over the last 10 years. Maybe it’s what I learned from Bombard’s body language vids, but I feel like something else is in play here.
LikeLike
It’s a look of an accomplished political hack.
LikeLike
The word tonight is that:
1) Blasey-Ford’s Stanford webpage claimed that she was a licensed psychologist, and
2) Her sworn testimony yesterday before the Senate Judiciary Committee was that she was a licensed psychologist, but
…drum roll please…
3) She’s not actually a licensed psychologist.
LikeLiked by 3 people
((( Psychology )))
LikeLike
Right.
She has a PhD in (((Edumukashunal Psychology))), but she is NOT a licensed psychologist.
LikeLike
Judging by her hair, she’s no werewolf of London.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Been a fan for a while now of Mandy Bombard’s impressive readings on people. I think it was when I saw videos of her telling us what’s really going on in videos of Hillary Clinton and other liberals. (Yes, in that unintentional dim lit red wine voice.) Can’t prove this but I read somewhere that she was delivered this service professionally for a police force.
Which is how I knew before watching her analysis video that Judge Brett’s protected accuser was employing at least one technique, the voice a woman will use to sound like a small defenseless girl. It snapped in cleanly to what I learned this time, the “pretty pose”, a technique used at the same time and for the same reason. Super useful information.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why do you think they didn’t rush out and testify immediately?
she had to get coached first. Men are way behind the curve on how devious women are
LikeLiked by 6 people
You can say that again, tears are the most manipulative thing a woman (or a man Steve Jobs cried a lot when it suited him) can do. Favourite ploy of someone with NPD.
LikeLike
i know about tears.
you know something, every time i’m in an argument with a bitch and she starts to cry i get insulted. Bc I feel like i’m being played.
I watched that RMG live thing someone linked to for a bit and those guys were a lot saner than i expected, probably bc they got a little older and chilled out. One of them said men don’t realize, with all this talk of game and whatnot, a game is being played on YOU. Women are playing a game every minute. They are born for it, for the psych manipulation…it’s who they are and what they are. evolution has endowed them with fearsome powers in this regard.
LikeLiked by 3 people
The most interesting thing about the tears ploy is how quickly it snaps off when the woman trying it on you figures out you’re not buying it. 180 degree turn around in an instant – really something to see.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Bombard is meh. She is plagued by the solipsism that halts women universally.
Everything she “reads” is processed through her own filter.
Post-post modern gypsum fortune teller.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Women love to play dress up and act.
Acting is actually feminine. Hence our culture being saturated by the feminine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
+1
women love to play ‘pretend’.
there are countless game routines all centered around this very concept. and they work.
LikeLike
she’s a consumate political hack. That’s the look of a smug guy scoring political points.
LikeLike
Crowdfunding! The Banco Ambrosiano in the XXIst Century.
LikeLike
I hope she’s found with housebricks in her pockets
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is there a Blackfriars Bridge in D.C.?
LikeLike
To Brett:
Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
To Brett:
No matter how the wind howls, the mountain will not bow to it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, weathering makes molehills out of mountains given a long enough period of effect. A more apt aphorism than you intended?
LikeLike
To Brett:
Ad astra, per aspera.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on The Daily Messenger (mirror).
LikeLike
I’ve seen this smirk thing in my line of work often. Most examination and questioning sessions are structured to ask the same questions repeatedly but with slight word variation. The reason is that if humans are unskilled at lying they will answer the 4 questions 1-2 will be different. Later the examination will revisit that subject. In general you will get an idea of what questions are gaining a response and how those are worded.
One of the classics is “Did you steal the pencil” vs “Was the pencil stolen”. The first question can get a categorical no, firm answer minimal behavior differences. The second would get a different response if the interviewee knew who stole the pencil but did not do it themselves.
When humans are asked about an untruth they typically don’t have a firm mental picture of the events around that. So different questions can get different answers. When they are asked a question where their lie is truthful they have make another fabrication, there is a mental and physiological response. The Smirk that Ballsy / Peter Strzok have is the physical manifestation of them exhibiting relief and secret joy that their fabrication was taken as truth. Many novice people believe that these smirks of other physical ticks indicate the misstatement was right before the smirk appearing. But in actuality it usually appears a decent amount of time after an answer was fabricated.
One area of the Ballsy interview I thought was telling. When she said she didn’t remember what day her polygraph took place, I thought that was exceedingly odd. Polygraph examinations are a unique event to most people who have never had one. I would not believe someone saying they didn’t remember a polygraph event.
Could be an innocent lapse. But my money is that the Polygraph event has some fabrications in it. Either that or she’s taken many polygraphs in her recent past. Which means she ex or current intelligence.
Peter Strzok for example being in counter intel would have had many many polygraphs. But yet under the glare of the senate he smirked. Ballsy and Peter both came across pretty credible too.
I hate to say this but many events lately have disturbing tell tale signs of an organized intelligence deception operation. The whole construction of the Ballsy story with it’s lack of specific investigative details smacks of a manufactured narrative that while sensationalist also has few details to trip up the storyteller.
Whoever prepared Ballsy to perform in the senate did a great job. Almost too good, but the narrative was easy to stick to because it was so vague. And my money is not that a lawyer(s) prepared her. She was prepared for testimony by someone skilled in constructing stories and fabrications out of whole cloth. This is a very rare skill which leads to people with very specific backgrounds.
Which frankly freaks me out a bit. These kinds of deception techniques were meant to topple 3rd world dictators. Not drive narratives in a modern democracy. Terrorism techniques have their origins in military commando training that then was repurposed for irregular forces. Modern terrorism training is the sum of 60 years of this irregular training by world militarizes for various wars and conflicts, and those techniques and tactics “leaked out”.
Now we are possibly seeing apparent intelligence information operation tactics being used in open testimony. It’s surreal to consider the possibility that many of the media narratives of the past few decades could have been heavily shaped via deception operations.
LikeLiked by 7 people
well look at all the mass killing with no blood to be found
LikeLike
“It’s surreal to consider the possibility that many of the media narratives of the past few decades could have been heavily shaped via deception operations.”
Good post. RE: your quote — You don’t say…
Remember the Maine!
A day that will live…. in Infamy!
Weapons of Mass Destruction!
Kerosene melts steel and pulverizes concrete into dust!
Adam Lanza killed 6 million children in 46 seconds.
I could go on but it’s one of those things where, once you see it, you can never unsee it and you can never again take any narrative from these (((people))) at face value, ever again.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Exactly.
LikeLike
“When she said she didn’t remember what day her polygraph took place, I thought that was exceedingly odd”
Yes, it was. It was only a couple months ago and might or might not have been on the same day as a funeral, another memorable event.
Yet she’s “100%” sure it was Kav 36 years ago. She’s not credible and I wish no one said she was except for the (((mainstream media))) who are too oblivious to realize they’re damaging their own credibility yet again. Only the most delusional pussy hatter would believe her.
LikeLiked by 1 person
that she did not know whose house it was…nor remember any details of the place. These are facts that would ordinarily stick in someone’s mind.
Likewise, she (and every woman) sells “assault” like this as if it were a brutal rape. When in reality,, NOTHING happened to her beyond getting pushed onto a bed while drunk at a party. It’s unexceptional.
But everything is rape now. And they’re survivors- as if physical survival were in question. You survive murder attempts or tsunamis, not rapes.
LikeLiked by 4 people
And this clumsy groping negatively affected her entire life.
Bitch please. GTFOOH with that bullshit. You’re not made of cotton candy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
they’ve been using NLP on us for 20 or 30 years. Frank Luntz made this his specialty and earned a lot of $ from it
LikeLiked by 3 people
(((Frank Luntz)))
LikeLiked by 1 person
. . . because the best liars first convince themselves of their honesty . . . Jerry, just remember, it’s not a lie, if you believe it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Somehow I imagine that the receptions that these two received from their mates upon returning home after testifying were quite different. Mrs. Kav was probably all over the judge while Mr. Ballsy’s scrotum had by then probably retreated to somewhere tucked under his liver.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Mrs. Kav is pretty cute herself. Hizzoner did good.
LikeLike
Tune in
LikeLike
Indeed. The smirk shows that the person KNOWS he/she is lying, or evil, or both.
There are other tells. Some people when they say something utterly false, will quickly and FURTIVELY look around in one or several direction other than straight ahead, the mannerism screaming “Did I get away with this whopper???”. Truthtellers might occasionally look around, but fairly slowly, NOT trying to hide that they gauge the impact on the audience.
Now, be careful. Often you can spot that somebody is almost certainly lying, by various mannerisms. But the absence of such manners does NOT guarantee that the person is telling the truth – some people are VERY good liars.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Clinton had this same “cat ate the canary” smirk when debate moderators teed her up with a pre-arranged question during the 2016 presidential debates.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ford seems not credible to me because apparently, even though her memory, by her own account is hazy on many of the details, and bringing this to the democratic arm of the senate would surely have profound consequences, for all, all around (which she surely would have grasped would be the case), she apparently made no effort to clear up the uncertainty memory-wise, in her own mind, ahead of all that, by checking first with the friend that went to the alleged party with her.
That is more than odd. That is a smoking gun, …. it just doesn’t add up. The most generous possible spin, among the many possible interpretations that stem from these odd circumstances: …….. she is a pathological narcissist that doesn’t think corroborating evidence is either here nor there, when it comes to her own beliefs. As far as I can see that is the most generous interpretation of the many versions that could be drawn for this odd set of circumstances. As such, I think, among the possible judgements about her character, based on this circumstance, …… pathological narcissism is the most generous spin. The other possible interpretations are less kind, character-judgment-wise.
I only watched snippets of the testimonies …… but, it sure is odd as well, that this most obvious line of questioning has not been raised by anyone directly involved in the spectacle, as far as I am aware (unless I am mistaken about that).
The correct approach, given the conflicting testimonies, would have been to explore glaring behavioral inconsistencies like this. Why has the obvious use of occam’s razor, in these events, been ignored? Very strange indeed (all round – for everyone involved). In fact, if I were Kavanaugh, and had noted that this question was not asked during her testimony (and he is a fool if he indeed failed to watched her testimony prior to giving his own testimony, as he claimed – not so smart – that), I would have brought forward that fact myself during his preliminary comments.
At this juncture this is really about who is more credible. But her credibility is pretty much zero, as far as I can see. Not hard to hi-light this, simply be using the hard facts at hand. Why was this obvious fact at ready hand (just begging for examination) not used?
LikeLiked by 1 person
“OK Christine. Where was this house?”
Most mammals, birds and reptiles subject to a traumatic predation attempt in early life retain a sharp visualisation/scent memory, and may develop an acute aversion to the locus. It’s a good thing. Stops you gettin’ et.
“OK Christine, how did you get there?”
“OK Christine, who invited you?”
“OK Christine was anyone apart from Marky and the Brettenwolf there?”
“OK Christine were you sober when you got there?”
etc. etc.
It’s farcical. “Just Believe!” me, and my pretendy ickle gurl voice. Wish we still had the Holy Inquisition.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Faarrk! it. Forgot the simplest Q.
“OK Christine, who’s feckin’ house was it? Were they at home?”
LikeLike
Exactly. She conveniently can’t remember who drove her or who’s house it was because then the committee could start asking people questions.
Can’t have THAT. Just BELIEVE women…
LikeLike
Subpoena her father.
Q: “Were you aware that, in the summer of 1982, your 15yo daughter was being driven around suburban Maryland to house parties so that she could get sh!t-faced drunk & that her n0tch count was already beginning to climb towards 100?”
Q: “And oh BTW, just who the phuck was your daughter’s chauffeur [or chauffeuse] for this debauchery?”
Q: “And what were your daughters hangovers like in the summer of 1982? How often did she vomit? How many times did she catch the flu?”
Q: “And how many ab0rtions did she have [that you know of]?”
LikeLike
Kinda doubt if the guilty here will ever be properly rewarded. Leaving aside the “Q” comedic fantasy currently playing, have you seen any of the guilty from the last administration really sweating it? Nah, me neither, and nor do I expect to. System is rigged. F the system. What would it take?
Love letters at 3000 fps. Or take a page from heroine Winnie M’s book and bring back “necklacing.” And I don’t mean with “pearls.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Q a “comedic fantasy”.
How DARE you, sir!
LikeLike
“How absolutely dare you, sir!” is proper form.
LikeLike
Yeh, well, I would love nothing better, but after following along with Q22 and the chans for nearly a year, I’d have to say it’s all taken on the feeling of a big “masterbatorium.” Probably shunts a lot of needed energy to ground.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Did our jest fall flat?
LikeLike
Does anyone have the latest on MPCdot shoah? Do they have an alternative site, are they gone for good?
Email me at king1xa at yahoo if your comment gets shoahed as well.
LikeLike
I tried registering but the requirements are too doxable for me. I wonder if there is a read-without-participation subscription that doesn’t require trusting one’s traceable information to (((third parties))). When anyone has an update, please share.
On the other hand, this is exactly the kind of hardening of targets I’ve been advocating lately. Turn your internet networks into defensible intranets far from the madding poz.
LikeLike
I have an account there and just got the notice that I’ve made the cut, so to speak, so as to have full access privileges, but they require a donation.
Eh, I can spare the few bones they’re asking for, so once I give them some amazon dollars, I’ll know better. I enjoy the site as there are about 4-5 solid commenters on there and it’s worth it for me.
Will keep you posted.
LikeLike
I have plenty of shekels to spare, but the cost of volunteering personal information without some reciprocal M.A.D. guarantee in this Age of Dox is too high.
LikeLiked by 1 person
what are they asking for?
LikeLike
Thank you for the analysis. It’s helping.
LikeLike
Kavanaugh was a shitshow. The left is meming all these pictures of him crying and making weird-ass faces trying to hold back tears. When he could have just been a chad and said, “No, fuck you, I didn’t do anything wrong, to the extent I fucked with her, which was hardly at all, the bitch wanted it. Now get out of my way and let me get the fuck on the Court.”
That’s how Trump won. Not by crying, “Theyre picking on me, wah!”.
LikeLike
who bitch dis is would have sufficed
LikeLiked by 1 person
Stuart: “ to the extent I fucked with her, which was hardly at all, the bitch wanted it. ”
Thanks for the advice, (((ally)))
LikeLike
I suppose all that truly sinister stuff CH has adumbrated above could actually be true to a greater or lesser extent, depending on which of the ranking shitlibs we hold in question…
But our Dr. Ford may simply be what she really seemed to me: a spoiled, simpering, childish, over-priviledged, prattling brat; an “educated fool” parroting ELEMENTARY textbook jargon and lecture-hall rote, who apparently LACKS the analytical power to answer ANYTHING plainly and cogently; a twit, a semi-moron – she didn’t even know what EXCULPATE meant(!?); an over-indulged, coddled GIRL-WOMAN allowed (by those around her) to nurse and nurture whatever bastard delusions flit across her incessantly addled mind.
A woman who has apparently lost herself inside an EPIC delusion – a delusion which has now sucked EVERYONE who has ever been even REMOTELY connected with her into one giant, tumultuous VORTEX of BULLSHIT!
DOCTOR Christine Blasey Ford is a living, breathing SHITSTORM of nonsense.
And this – THIS – is what passes, nowadays for an Ivy League PhD?
Somehow THAT is even more frightening than any or all of this supposed Shitlib Satanism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree… if muh Deep State was so powerful and Byzantine, they would have come up with a credible woman, a credible story, and five corroborating witnesses.
The fact that ANYONE took this woman seriously shows that we’re ruled by a pack of bozos who couldn’t count their fingers and come up with the same answer twice.
The wealth of the nation, be it fiat or otherwise, and productivity and remaining slim majority of high-trust individuals is the only thing keeping the wheels on the cart at this point.
LikeLike
Dr. Blasey-Ford’s Daddy Issues http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3691968/posts
LikeLike
Turns out that Deep State Brit Hume knows BOTH Brett Kavanaugh’s father AND Christine Blasey’s father.
LikeLike
^^^^^It’s a good read.
Shows you how deeply incestuous this sh!znat is.
LikeLike
ex ex verdict is in
she said you can tell she is fucking lying by her facial expressions
when she is crying she is trying to force out tears
and why did she wait 36 years
when she was with me before I had her not swearing he he he
LikeLike
babies who shit themselves make that face too. Scroll back up and look at them and you can see the saying, “I pooped my pants!”
LikeLike
BOOM
LikeLike
Me thinks Murican cucks are going to get owned by their own women.
“After watching Kavanaugh hearing, woman accuses republican senator of rape”
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/29/after-watching-hearing-woman-accuses-washington-state-lawmaker-raping-her-in-2007.html
LikeLike
@passerby
otoh we’re talking senator ((fain))
so it’s 50-50
LikeLike
I’m starting to think this is all just a big charade played on us by all the sides, Trump possibly excluded. Between the odd connections of kavanaugh’s and Ford’s families. The soap opera of Flake herocially changing his mind, the melodramatic righteous anger of Faggy Graham, the “spontaneous protests. This has the feel of the Chandra Leavey drama of early 2001, which seems to have been an distraction from the upcoming grand event, 9/11. I think we are all watching the left hand, while the right one is preparing something big. I’m going to wager a big war. Something stinks in Denmark.
– WOMEN SCREAMING AT FLAKE IN ELEVATOR Were Soros-Funded Astroturfed Activist Leaders! — NOT VICTIMS –
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/women-screaming-at-flake-in-elevator-were-soros-funded-astroturfed-activist-leaders-not-sex-abuse-victims/
LikeLiked by 1 person
yea prob get all the white dudes who will fight off to a war while diversity stays behind to take care of the woman
you think they gonna draft Mexicans who aren’t citizens right then all the sudden they will be considered illegals cant be drafted?
LikeLike
Non-citizens got drafted straight off the boat during the Civil War, but those were different times. The Mexicrents will never fight for their new “home”. I cant say I blame them, they’re only here for the freebies. Its the white man thats the idiot who will get his head blown off for “patriotism” , “the American way of live”, “freedom”, “democracy” and of course ” the flag “.
LikeLiked by 2 people
” Non-citizens got drafted straight off the boat during the Civil War”
Pffttt.. dumb Paddies, how in the hell would you ever keep them away from the sound of gunfire?
LikeLike
Pffttt.. dumb Paddies, how in the hell would you ever keep them away from the sound of gunfire?”””””’
yea I had to fight to go to my first war lolzolzolzolz
they wanted to let me chill in the rear
LikeLike
– Jeff Flake got harassed and manipulated by a protester in the elevator today by a lady of an organization heavily funded by George Soros –
https://yourperceptionisnotreality.wordpress.com/2018/09/29/jeff-flake-got-harassed-and-manipulated-by-a-protester-in-the-elevator-today-by-a-lady-of-an-organization-heavily-funded-by-george-soros/
LikeLike
I’m calling BS, there are too many “random” connections between Ford and weepy Kavanaugh . We are being played.
– Brett Kavanaugh’s mother is judge who dismissed a foreclosure action against accuser Ford’s parents –
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/18/brett-kavanaughs-mother-is-judge-who-dismissed-foreclosure-action-against-accuser-fords-parents.html?cmpid=prn_msn
LikeLike
No way is this payoff money for a ” job well done “, no way in heaven. SMH
– GoFundMe campaigns supporting Christine Blasey Ford top $700K –
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/409027-gofundme-campaign-supporting-christine-blasey-ford-reach-over
LikeLike
It’s irritating watching money showered on the undeserving, but it also tends to be its own retribution (i.e. they end up much worse off than when they started).
LikeLike
I wouldn’t mind close to a $mil for a couple hours of lying. This is a farce.
LikeLike
Rosenstein himself pushed the Jeff Flake button: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/what-last-person-senator-jeff-flake-called-before-asking-for-another-week-of-supreme-insanity-was-dag-rod-rosenstein/
LikeLike
Bill Maher the latest shitlib to gay shame Lindsay Graham.
He also called McCain his “dead boyfriend “.
Wow the new fanged shitlib love for McCain did not last long.
LikeLike
Also underlines that shitlibs believe in nothing.
LikeLike
It’s the solipsism of women. They will say and do anything to get what they want or destroy what they can’t have and will feel justified in doing so.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bill Maher is in the Red Shoe club. He has literally eaten human flesh. Amasius must admire him deeply.
LikeLike
She’s been lying about her creds, too. She’s no psychologist, contrary to her many claims the other day. I’d post the link, but look it up.
LikeLike
https://www.dangerous.com/49836/records-show-dr-ford-is-not-a-licensed-psychologist-may-have-committed-perjury/
LikeLike
All you need is family connections to the CIA and doors open for you that would otherwise be closed.
LikeLike
http://impiousdigest.com/daughter-of-cia-assassin-paymaster-tries-to-bring-down-trump-supreme-court-nominee-kavanaugh/
LikeLike
Longer post in Mod. Source for this article is a Russian Foreign Intel Service report. The Internship program runs out of the Public Service School but has deep connections to the Psychiatry school. Mk Ultra anyone?
LikeLike
Trump said this might be a blessing in disguise. Let’s hope so. If the FBI turns up nothing, then Trump will hold frame and the worst case is a couple senators cuck out and BK becomes a martyr. Trump can and will get a shitlord in that seat.
LikeLike