Listen for the *preen* cue starting around 4:40…
F. Roger Devlin On The Woman Question
Jul 18th, 2018 by CH
14 Responses to “F. Roger Devlin On The Woman Question”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
This is the primary contention of men like Joe Jordan and Warren Balogh. They insist that the lib-con dichotomy is not just shopworn, but also a fake divide manufactured by jews, so when jews are exposed as the divisive element in White nations there will follow a coming-together of right-wing and left-wing Whites.
I remain skeptical of this theory, if only because there are real sociobiological and neural differences between temperamentally rightist and leftist Whites, but I agree that the situation we find ourselves in would improve dramatically if the first step is simply removing judeo-prop from our public discourse, and removing jewish influence over our politics and fiscal stewardship.
-
I'm sure the jews are hand-rubbing with glee that they have another sex war wedge to drive into the heart of the White race, but that doesn't mean the White woman sympathy for Clancy is faked or astroturfed.
Two things can be true at once: The social atomization and sexual liberation of modernity and collapsing empire are corrupting our women, and the jews are jewzzing to exploit another corrosive effect of modernity to make White collectivism impossible.
-
Environmentalism was traditionally a right-wing sentiment. It became lib-coded in the 20th century, when it was tied to leftoid shibboleths about colonialism, White racism, and White capitalist greed (which in turn made anti-environmentalism right-coded).
The potential exists for a right-left White alliance on the topic of environmentalism, but only if libwhites can pull the anti-racism scales from their eyes and accept that nonwhites are the primary despoilers of nature.
I doubt that ever happens, unless by some miracle judeo-propaganda evaporates from our culture like a dense choking zog-smog blown away with the prevailing winds.
-
I would say that if you're trying to get laid, arguing with her is the last thing a man should do. Arguing with these banshees online until they glitch is just good old-fashioned, spankin' fun.
-
That is not true. Or at least it is lacking any important context. Domestic violence rates are roughly the same between male and female perpetrators, but female victims tend to suffer more severe injuries because male perps are stronger.
Women, because of their smaller physical size, tend to resort more often to manipulative, emotional abuse that doesn't make for splashy headlines.
Beyond that correction, I have no clue what you're arguing here. Clancy murdered her kids. No one is arguing that men should have a monopoly on murdering their children, yet that appears to be what you are insinuating with your snarky man-hate.
What you evade is the real story, which is not Clancy herself. It is the outpouring of female support for her that is opening a lot of men's eyes to the foul, blackened hearts of too many of our modernity-soaked women.
-
Voter suppression is a healthy instinct in a multiracial empire.
-
We live in a judaicized culture where saying the nigger-word in a moment of justifiable anger gets the book thrown at you and a GoFundMe set up for the phone-stalking nigger, while murdering your three children results in a mass queefing of support for the murderess because she was on anti-depressents, had post-partum depression, and/or was driven to it by systemic misogyny.
If any of this is making you feel like the last normal person in the world, you're not alone.
-
Your economic policy preferences don't matter. The crucial distinction between right and left is race. And by your own account, you are a true believer in racial equalism and colorblindness, which makes you a leftist.
-
It's my belief that my big balls should be held every night🎶
Australia is a massive real world experiment in the limits of regression to the mean.
Australia began as a penal colony for obstreperous English Whites, but since they are White first and criminals second, over many generations their Australian descendants merged to the English White norm for civilized behavior.
But.....not all the way! The merger was, in a word, stopped a few rowdy DNA strands short, and you get intoxicated mates punching sharks in the face.
-
At this point, racialist Whites should hope that the midterms are a bloodbath for the establishment Dems to complement MAGA's fall from grace.
A pretty decent outcome would be a slew of hard left DSA brownoids winning their races, and making it clear to White America that they no longer hold the wheel on this runaway short bus.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
Nice
LikeLike
Sweet!
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] F. Roger Devlin On The Woman Question […]
LikeLike
Devlin’s book “Sexual Utopia in Power” is mandatory reading.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Beat me to it. Pairs well with “The Manipulated Man” by (((Esther Vilar)))
LikeLike
Da gbfm was a big fan of F. Roger Devlin. I miss his insight.
Too bad he’s busy running the country and doesn’t comment here anymore.
LikeLike
Good work CH.
LikeLike
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.toqonline.com/archives/v6n2/DevlinTOQV6N2.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi8iPKBrqncAhUs5IMKHWP8DAcQ5OUBMAd6BAgHEAE&usg=AOvVaw2dn1Q9PejSdMtyCJUz1wjE
Theres the pdf.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This post will not garner the most fanfare, but it’s all about why I respect the proprietor. The great thing about game is that it only works for minds of intellectual integrity. Ragnar Danneskjöld set down his pen. Opportunity costs. Mass marketing is never progressive. I don’t know what more you can accomplish as a blogger. Maybe you should devote more time to being a mentor? Or poolside? You must have your reasons. I heard intelligent men today, by a recording. There is isolated decency in the world. The locusts show me their ugly faces and minds every time I look or listen beyond my room. It’s all quite maddening. Libtards to the left of me, cuckservies to the right.
LikeLiked by 3 people
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Wow, red pills galore
LikeLike
“The system of monogamy serves not to restrict sex for men, but to get sex for as many men as possible.”
I found this line to be a real eye opener and something I had never considered.
LikeLike
Interesting talk.
“When sex is liberated from marriage”… you get women “mating with the most attractive men available.” We get a “traffic jam at the top of the sexual hierarchy.”
We all know this.
We also know (or I do) that married men don’t actual fuck their wives often, if at all. So it’s not really about SEX, but about “PARTNERS.” It’s not about “mating,” it’s about “having a mate.”
I fully agree that marriage is good for civilization, but not because those “lower men” get sex. They don’t. Married people rarely fuck.
This is about ENVY and perceived social status. A man that can’t get a “mate” (even one that won’t fuck him, or he doesn’t want to fuck), has a lower social status than a man that can… and it’s OBVIOUS, it’s true “out in the public square.” People can see a “mate” even if they can’t see “mating.” And being “obviously lower” in status injures the pride of those men… and those men are then less than ideal for a stable civilization (and the cooperation required for stability).
LikeLike
“The people that have embraced feminism and the sexual revolution, will fail to reproduce. And the people… that have children/families will become the parents of the future generation. Over time, the problem will solve itself.”
— F. Roger Devlin
On a related topic, this is one of the best reads I’ve come across in a long time:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/20/the-return-of-patriarchy/
“The emergence of a new society whose members will disproportionately be descended from parents who rejected the social tendencies that once made childlessness and small families the norm.”
— Longman
LikeLike