Listen for the *preen* cue starting around 4:40…
F. Roger Devlin On The Woman Question
Jul 18th, 2018 by CH
14 Responses to “F. Roger Devlin On The Woman Question”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
Trump is in, what I would call, the Shabbos Goydian Knot.
There is a sword that can cut it, but Trump will never wield it.
-
If AI truly poses a danger to humanity (and I believe it does), then the dismissive response "but we can't let China win the AI race" is irrelevant to the debate.
You either have a government that allows the danger to materialize, or prevents the danger from happening.
Republicans, as per usual, are on the global capitalism side of this debate.
-
Steve Sailer asks which cancelled social scientist deserves a one million dollar philanthropic prize for courage under fire.
One cheeky commenter to Sailer's substack post suggested Kevin MacDonald.
Sailer 'likes' almost every comment. But he had no 'like' to spare for that comment.
-
Istanbul, Constantinople.....either way it ain't Fire Island!
-
The American flag means nothing to the nons coming here by the millions to parasitize White America. At this point, it's better for Whites to ask themselves which flag would frighten the nons into remigrating?
They don't fear what the American flag represents (why would they? it represents gibs by the sackful), but they will fear the flag taken up by an explicitly pro-White revolution.
-
Classic jewish dialectic strategy. Monopolize all sides to prevent authentic discourse that challenges jewish power or ethnic advantage.
-
Genocidal miscegenation doesn't have to be forced upon a people. All that has to happen is relocating different races into close proximity with the race targeted for destruction, and miscegenation inevitably occurs without a strong State and culture-directed prohibition against it.
-
"Locked borders work because they stop races mixing, which is how genocidal miscegenation spreads."
Wow, thank you, Dr Neil (((Stone))), very astute, hard to disagree.
-
Hasan Piker seems more and more like a Regime psy op to get independent Whites back on the Uniparty plantation.
-
I've read complaints from cranky contrarians that the Patriot Front video showcasing a member slapping a PF sticker over a "Free Palestine" sticker somewhere in DC is proof that Patriot Front are feds, or closeted Zionist "rightoids".
Nah, that's a tepid take. Much more plausible an explanation is that the pro-Palestine movement is inextricably linked in the US with pro-faggot, pro-tranny, and anti-White antifa leftoid activism. The perception of this linkage, which is very much a ground truth reality, would naturally motivate instinctive pro-Whites like the men from PF to bristle at the sight of pro-Palestine stickers, knowing full well that it is a movement that exists as part of a larger constellation of anti-White leftist causes.
That doesn't mean Patriot Front are pro-Zionism, or tools for jewish power. It means that pro-Palestine pro-Whites who want to move more Whites into anti-semitism had better work hard at distancing themselves from the Degenerate Freak Parade that currently headlines pro-Palestine protests.
I bet the actual Palestinians would appreciate the house-cleaning.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
Nice
LikeLike
Sweet!
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] F. Roger Devlin On The Woman Question […]
LikeLike
Devlin’s book “Sexual Utopia in Power” is mandatory reading.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Beat me to it. Pairs well with “The Manipulated Man” by (((Esther Vilar)))
LikeLike
Da gbfm was a big fan of F. Roger Devlin. I miss his insight.
Too bad he’s busy running the country and doesn’t comment here anymore.
LikeLike
Good work CH.
LikeLike
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.toqonline.com/archives/v6n2/DevlinTOQV6N2.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi8iPKBrqncAhUs5IMKHWP8DAcQ5OUBMAd6BAgHEAE&usg=AOvVaw2dn1Q9PejSdMtyCJUz1wjE
Theres the pdf.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This post will not garner the most fanfare, but it’s all about why I respect the proprietor. The great thing about game is that it only works for minds of intellectual integrity. Ragnar Danneskjöld set down his pen. Opportunity costs. Mass marketing is never progressive. I don’t know what more you can accomplish as a blogger. Maybe you should devote more time to being a mentor? Or poolside? You must have your reasons. I heard intelligent men today, by a recording. There is isolated decency in the world. The locusts show me their ugly faces and minds every time I look or listen beyond my room. It’s all quite maddening. Libtards to the left of me, cuckservies to the right.
LikeLiked by 3 people
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Wow, red pills galore
LikeLike
“The system of monogamy serves not to restrict sex for men, but to get sex for as many men as possible.”
I found this line to be a real eye opener and something I had never considered.
LikeLike
Interesting talk.
“When sex is liberated from marriage”… you get women “mating with the most attractive men available.” We get a “traffic jam at the top of the sexual hierarchy.”
We all know this.
We also know (or I do) that married men don’t actual fuck their wives often, if at all. So it’s not really about SEX, but about “PARTNERS.” It’s not about “mating,” it’s about “having a mate.”
I fully agree that marriage is good for civilization, but not because those “lower men” get sex. They don’t. Married people rarely fuck.
This is about ENVY and perceived social status. A man that can’t get a “mate” (even one that won’t fuck him, or he doesn’t want to fuck), has a lower social status than a man that can… and it’s OBVIOUS, it’s true “out in the public square.” People can see a “mate” even if they can’t see “mating.” And being “obviously lower” in status injures the pride of those men… and those men are then less than ideal for a stable civilization (and the cooperation required for stability).
LikeLike
“The people that have embraced feminism and the sexual revolution, will fail to reproduce. And the people… that have children/families will become the parents of the future generation. Over time, the problem will solve itself.”
— F. Roger Devlin
On a related topic, this is one of the best reads I’ve come across in a long time:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/20/the-return-of-patriarchy/
“The emergence of a new society whose members will disproportionately be descended from parents who rejected the social tendencies that once made childlessness and small families the norm.”
— Longman
LikeLike