Listen for the *preen* cue starting around 4:40…
F. Roger Devlin On The Woman Question
Jul 18th, 2018 by CH
14 Responses to “F. Roger Devlin On The Woman Question”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
Convenience and ease are the lullabies sung to Whites as they are swaddled in a straitjacket.
-
The kikes didn't "deal with" the Germans. Their Anglo shabbos mercenaries dealt with the Germans. Talk about Stolen Pallor!
Also, gotta love that yid gratitude. "Thanks, America, for your help! Now here's your orchestrated demise in return."
-
Also, Mamdani seems to be advocating for highly secure, closed borders. If you aren't from here, then it's "papers please!" before you can buy food.
Funny how that works. You have a single secure border at the national level, or you have many secure borders at the local level.
Either way, borders are the natural order.
-
It's fair (and easy) to criticize the idea of Whites being objectively the most beautiful race in the world, premised on the counter-argument that each race has an innate preference for the looks of its own people. One could say that Whites are just as biased as all other races to think their own the most comely.
The problem with this tepid take is that we have evidence that races from across the world strive to look White. Indians love to whiten their skin. Orientals get cosmetic surgery to widen their epicanthic folds. The male nigger can't stop asking "where da White women at?".
Sheeeit, even niglets prefer to play with White dolls.
news.ucr.edu/articles/2022/09/29/liking-anoth
While there is truth to the assertion that a racial beauty bias exists, there appears to be a competing truth that White is the pinnacle of beauty in the eyes of all.
-
Create the crisis (racial diversity, freakshow coddling)
Present the Orwellian solution.
Anticipate backlash.
Remove Orwellian solution, crisis returns even harder.
People beg for the Orwellian solution.
Happily give them what they demand.Meanwhile, the real solution goes unmentioned and the people become slaves of Berg Brother.
-
The honor system only works with an honorable people. No Hajnalite Whites, no functional honor system. More diversity, less honor.
So this tracks with an increasing regularity of US election fraud.
-
Sounds plausible that might play a role, but then we'd see the most facially beautiful women from races which evolved in year-round cold climates, such as the Eskimos. But that is not the case.
I think certain races simply value facial female beauty more than do other races, and that one will find this favoritism in genocultural regions where monogamy became the norm early on, and men and women stayed together for many years to raise children. A man has to like what he sees of a woman if he sees her all the time.
A test of this hypothesis would be surveys asking men from various countries which female physical attribute they most highly value. Another clue would be surveys of sex positions; hypothetically, face-to-face positions would be less common or less preferred among races that evolved a nonmonagamous sexual market.
-
He'll change his tune once Bond is black.
-
Thousand Points of White
...a brilliant harmony, spread like stars, like a thousand points of White in a broad and peaceful sky.
-
White faces are objectively beautiful (although Orientals have a stated dislike for the "prominent" White nose).
European monogamy exerted a tremendous selection pressure for female beauty (which was then genetically redistributed to sons as well as daughters), because a man who plans to invest all his energy and resources into one woman, foregoing sexual opportunities with other women, will be very careful about the fitness quality of the woman he chooses.
Couple monogamy with a prolonged culling of European hunter-gatherer males during the age of megafauna hunts, and you have a sexual market in which fewer men have more women from which to choose, and those men chose the prettiest women...this is the evolutionary crucible which likely produced our captivating riot of hair and eye colors.
If you dislike the Darwinian explanation, you may lean on the spiritual claim that Whites are the true Israel of the Lord, and our race was blessed by God.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
Nice
LikeLike
Sweet!
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] F. Roger Devlin On The Woman Question […]
LikeLike
Devlin’s book “Sexual Utopia in Power” is mandatory reading.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Beat me to it. Pairs well with “The Manipulated Man” by (((Esther Vilar)))
LikeLike
Da gbfm was a big fan of F. Roger Devlin. I miss his insight.
Too bad he’s busy running the country and doesn’t comment here anymore.
LikeLike
Good work CH.
LikeLike
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.toqonline.com/archives/v6n2/DevlinTOQV6N2.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi8iPKBrqncAhUs5IMKHWP8DAcQ5OUBMAd6BAgHEAE&usg=AOvVaw2dn1Q9PejSdMtyCJUz1wjE
Theres the pdf.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This post will not garner the most fanfare, but it’s all about why I respect the proprietor. The great thing about game is that it only works for minds of intellectual integrity. Ragnar Danneskjöld set down his pen. Opportunity costs. Mass marketing is never progressive. I don’t know what more you can accomplish as a blogger. Maybe you should devote more time to being a mentor? Or poolside? You must have your reasons. I heard intelligent men today, by a recording. There is isolated decency in the world. The locusts show me their ugly faces and minds every time I look or listen beyond my room. It’s all quite maddening. Libtards to the left of me, cuckservies to the right.
LikeLiked by 3 people
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Wow, red pills galore
LikeLike
“The system of monogamy serves not to restrict sex for men, but to get sex for as many men as possible.”
I found this line to be a real eye opener and something I had never considered.
LikeLike
Interesting talk.
“When sex is liberated from marriage”… you get women “mating with the most attractive men available.” We get a “traffic jam at the top of the sexual hierarchy.”
We all know this.
We also know (or I do) that married men don’t actual fuck their wives often, if at all. So it’s not really about SEX, but about “PARTNERS.” It’s not about “mating,” it’s about “having a mate.”
I fully agree that marriage is good for civilization, but not because those “lower men” get sex. They don’t. Married people rarely fuck.
This is about ENVY and perceived social status. A man that can’t get a “mate” (even one that won’t fuck him, or he doesn’t want to fuck), has a lower social status than a man that can… and it’s OBVIOUS, it’s true “out in the public square.” People can see a “mate” even if they can’t see “mating.” And being “obviously lower” in status injures the pride of those men… and those men are then less than ideal for a stable civilization (and the cooperation required for stability).
LikeLike
“The people that have embraced feminism and the sexual revolution, will fail to reproduce. And the people… that have children/families will become the parents of the future generation. Over time, the problem will solve itself.”
— F. Roger Devlin
On a related topic, this is one of the best reads I’ve come across in a long time:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/20/the-return-of-patriarchy/
“The emergence of a new society whose members will disproportionately be descended from parents who rejected the social tendencies that once made childlessness and small families the norm.”
— Longman
LikeLike