Feed on
Posts
Comments

The successful pair-bond is the successful polarity-bond. Ever try to squeeze two magnets of the same pole together, as feminists and manginas insist we all do? REPULSION!

The dominant man<–>submissive woman is the strongest magnet in the known universe. The submissive man<–>submissive woman or the dominant man<–>dominant woman are the weakest bonds. In warped sexual markets, the submissive man<–>dominant woman couple can work — for a while — but it’s a coupling of egoistic convenience rather than one of passion. Its bond is reliable enough for tax purposes but also weak, and marked by frequent resentments that can provoke unfaithfulness.

The current Western sexual market is riven with submissive man<–>dominant woman couples, which doesn’t bode well. It’s why assortative mating along arid criteria like credentials and political ideology are the norm now instead of the exception, and why mating along hot wet passionate criteria like masculine-feminine frisson and provider-nurturer sex-based roles is becoming less the norm and more the exceptional act of rebellion.

Hard times will bring back the ideal Darwinian bond of strong men coupling with submissive women.

115 Responses to “Beautiful Truth Of The Day: Sexual Polarity”

  1. […] Beautiful Truth Of The Day: Sexual Polarity […]

    Like

  2. cortesar says:

    Weininger’s immutable law of sexual attraction

    —————————————————————————————————–
    . . . The law runs as follows: “For true sexual union it is necessary that there come together a complete male (M) and a complete female (F), even although in different cases the M and F are distributed between the two individuals in different proportions.”

    Were a man completely male, his requisite complement would be a complete female, and vice versa. If, however, he is composed of a definite inheritance of maleness, and also an inheritance of femaleness (which must not be neglected), then, to complete the individual, his maleness must be completed to make a unit; but so also must his femaleness be completed.
    ——————————————————————————————————

    Like

    • cortesar says:

      Weininger’s law of woman emancipation

      A woman’s demand for emancipation and her qualification for it are in direct proportion to the amount of maleness in her

      The vast majority of women have never paid special attention to art or to science, and regard such occupations merely as higher branches of manual labour, or if they profess a certain devotion to such subjects, it is chiefly as a mode of attracting a particular person or group of persons of the opposite sex. Apart from these, a close investigation shows that women really interested in intellectual matters are sexually intermediate forms
      ———————————————————————————————

      these sexually intermediate forms , I said previously, are mostly yentas
      Indeed all leading feminists are ugly and masculine

      Like

      • cortesar says:

        now this is very interesting

        Is it not very remarkable that the agitation for the emancipation of women seems to repeat itself at certain intervals in the world’s history, and lasts for a definite period?

        It has been noticed that in the tenth, fifteenth, and sixteenth, and now again in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the agitation for the emancipation of women has been more marked, and the woman’s movement more vigorous than in the intervening periods. It would be premature to found a hypothesis on the data at our disposal, but the possibility of a vastly important periodicity must be borne in mind, of regularly recurring periods in which it may be that there is an excess of production of hermaphrodite and sexually intermediate forms. Such a state of affairs is not unknown in the animal kingdom.

        According to my interpretation, such a period would be one of minimum “gonochorism,” cleavage of the sexes; and it would be marked, on the one hand, by an increased production of male women, and on the other, by a similar increase in female men. There is strong evidence in favour of such a periodicity; if it occurs it may be associated with the “secessionist taste,” which idealised tall, lanky women with flat chests and narrow hips. The enormous recent increase in a kind of dandified homosexuality may be due to the increasing effeminacy of the age, and the peculiarities of the Pre-Raphaelite movement may have a similar explanation

        Liked by 1 person

      • cortesar says:

        A complete obliteration will be the fate of any emancipation movement which attempts to place the whole sex in a new relation to society, and to see in man its perpetual oppressor. A corps of Amazons might be formed, but as time went on the material for the corps would cease to occur. The history of the woman movement during the Renaissance and its complete disappearance contains a lesson for the advocates of women’s rights. Real intellectual freedom cannot be attained by an agitated mass; it must be fought for by the individual. Who is the enemy? What are the retarding influences?
        ————————————————————————————————–
        Real intellectual freedom cannot be attained by an agitated mass
        lolz we children pf 21 century may add
        “…even if the said mass is 350 lb on average”

        Sex and Character is the foremost ref pill book
        You can find it here for free
        just pay separate shipping and handling (350 lb+)

        http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html

        Like

      • axiom_verge says:

        The book can be found and read/downloaded online, no obligation to purchase.

        And yes, I agree to your recommending it. Great book.
        Could be of help to people’s insecurity in dealing with their feminine part (expressed by their compensatory anthems sung to total masculinity).

        Like

      • Otto Weininger? The possibly-gay Jew who thought that both homosexuals and Jews were defective–and, perhaps because of these beliefs, killed himself? Not exactly an advertisement for healthy values.

        Like

  3. tripper says:

    Heartizters! I just got a new telegram from Kronstadt! Refreshed directions on da femeles! Cheka writes:
    “starting this day, if the person of female sex being a prude, does not do anal, or otherwise disrespectz the commitee member send her the following textz: ” wghat was the topic on Tsk KPSS meeting today” This should confuse the female member of the society and make them google the term, which will lead them to our site,therfore giving us ad moneyz…and god knows rev-OVULATION-aries needs moneyz.

    rezpect

    Liked by 2 people

  4. tripper says:

    Cheka has the following instructionez on how to srtart da revulition
    Tell everyone how manly (TM) you are by choosing one of the following options:
    1) da big gunz dude
    #) da tattoed dude
    2) never shaved (instered prt of the body) dude
    2) da old&experienzed dude
    4) da liberal dude
    %) da right wing dissident (TM) dude
    then
    post yr opinionz onto 4chan, bbt make it pfuny, so the normies (TM) laugh and use their energy by typing into screen instead if picking up womenz. After womenz will lose interest in da intercourse sexus with their male matez we will take it from there.

    Like

  5. MikeR says:

    Not bad for a 35 year old:

    Like

  6. tripper says:

    Heytizers! I’m picking up a morse’ code on my laptop, straight from de Cheka’s officez! Felix ♦♦♦♦ writes himself:
    daer cumrades, thank you for all ur hard work on the de new battlefield – de internetez; for that we are finally can do the f0ck we want in de real world and expand our idea beyonz united states of comunistic c0unts or U-SUCC for short ( but mine is long actually.)

    P.S. cumrades please keep supporting us at nkvde.cum,as they say in de Cheka a small donation a day keep the womenz away

    Like

  7. Mr Meaner says:

    CNN calls out the ridiculousness of #metoo…….

    ….when the accused is not white..

    Liked by 1 person

  8. cortesar says:

    .@jordanbpeterson is asked a very basic question about the fundamentals of an author he talks significantly about. His answer “I can’t do it”

    His crowd that apparently hates SJWs and loves truth cheers.

    Man up Jordan. Address the truth. https://t.co/DET32AKbqj

    — Sheli Shmosley (@Sheli_Shmosley) January 26, 2018

    Like

    • As much as I respect Jordan Peterson and his work, he undoubtedly has a massive blind spot when it comes to (((THEM))).

      In most respects, it works to his favour in that he addresses deep and important issues and truths that people want to hear while being oblivious to the role that (((THEY))) have played throughout the last few thousand years.

      To name (((THEM))) would be career suicide.

      We should be thankful for what he has achieved so far and the truths that he has brought forward and to light and the role that he has played in getting men, in particular, more woke.

      Others will come that will build upon the foundations that Peterson has laid and/or will join more dots that will further show the influence, power and roles that (((THEY))) have had and continue to have.

      Liked by 2 people

      • axiom_verge says:

        He’s fallen addicted to visibility by some time now.
        Some mass attention has altered his behaviour quite fast.

        Like

      • CalvinDecline says:

        I don’t want to get ahead of myself (Jordan Peterson’s video’s have done a lot for me over the past year)… but could it also simply be that he’s cognizant of the hand that feeds him and perhaps biding his time?

        He had no issue speaking out against his college/place of employment and getting everyone there riled up… but (((they))) have a lot more power than a few people in college faculty positions.

        Maybe it wasn’t until after speaking up against his college that he REALLY started to understand who’s in charge.

        Just spit ballin’

        Liked by 1 person

      • Peterson in his videos with other academics has been touting this “Chicago Statement” on free speech in academe, so now that U. of Chicago academics are trying to disinvite Steve Bannon from participating in a MODERATED DEBATE on immigration because it would be “platforming bigotry” or what not, it’ll be interesting to see what happens.

        In fairness to Jordan, I think it’s clear there are some red pills which he buries in a careful (((Straussian))) fashion. For example, in his movielength chat with Camille Paglia, he clearly referenced–in passing– the bedrock nature of IQ testing and its consistent findings, and Camille nodded. Now we know Camille Paglia has, god save her, a bit of a lesbian mystery meat fetish for her mulatto Brazilians, so whatever cognitive dissonance she suffers she’s probably not going to come out and brazenly acknowledge the issue. But they clearly know there’s something there, and they know it has to be taken seriously.

        But he also obviously very much hopes we can just sort of “free speech” our way peacefully back to some kind of reset on liberal civilization, seemingly without a reckoning on the total follow of female “emancipation” and the racial issues. That’s a problem, and a limitation. It’s sometimes painful to hear his fulsome-sounding praise for the “hugely competent” women he sees in his practice (bit of a contradiction right there!). Otoh, Lord knows he’s a hell of a lot more useful than somebody like Jonathan Haidt, who basically is only struggling to be enlightened on one narrow issue while sniveling his liberal credentials with every other breath.

        [CH: bit of a contradiction, i’ll say! makes me think peterson knows he’s bullshitting when he says stuff like that which fluffs female egos, and knows we know he’s bullshitting, so it’s all good man.]

        Like

      • (sequel to comment in mod)

        But on balance, I see what JP’s followers, especially young men, find so engaging and affecting about him. In many ways I think he does come across as a “fantasy professor”– considerate, engaging, but at the same time seemingly living apart in some exciting, barely glimpsed empyrean of ideas. It has occurred to me at times that he comes off like a gentile Harold Bloom– a double-edged compliment! The melancholic but not TOO melancholic quality makes him intriguing– and we can glimpse the effect it has on at least certain women. On the whole, I like the guy– but by all means, we can hope he’ll push much further, and not succumb to the chimera of academic detachment (or worse, prove to be a shill or get bought out). But I’m rooting for the man.

        Like

  9. Jordan says:

    Married (2 years) 33yr old lurker chiming in. CH is right 99.8% of the time. This umble chateau led me to the HB9 i call wifey. Shit, she reads and agrees with most of it.
    Thanks for illumination
    J

    Liked by 1 person

  10. MikeR says:

    Not one of (((them))), I assure you. She’s white.

    Like

      • cortesar says:

        now tell us what do you find so fascinating about her
        You can find many younger and better looking empty headed models to worship
        why her?

        Like

      • MikeR says:

        Cortesar, is there a specific look in a girl that you find more attractive than others? For me, this girl has it, she’s what I would describe as “my type”.

        She has a sweet, feminine look, just the right amount of make-up from all the photos I’ve seen, and no “thousand-cock stare” as far as I can tell, and at the age of 35, still looking fine.

        But just like that 40 year old who was presented a few posts ago, desperately running out of time to pass on her good genes.

        Liked by 1 person

      • oink says:

        Bunz outta oven + 3 = ?

        for this particular specimen?

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        MR, you’ve been acting very JIDF since you first popped up on the radar, but just in case you’re honestly curious, we True Whites have a strong visceral dislike for [bordering on an outright disgust with] “Dark Roots” in our blondes.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        You seem very concerned about who’s White and who ain’t, sock puppy.

        And tell your alter ego, t-o-m-j-o-n-e-s that neither you nor he are fooling anyone.

        Yeggs like this is why we lose.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      Very lovely. She is likely still fertile and would recover well too. Marry her. You will get a reasonable return on your investment.

      Like

    • I like her looks wise. Why no man?

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        There’s the $64K question.

        An alleged 35 year old who looks ten years younger and about as untainted as a woman could look these days?

        There’s a fly in the pie somewhere here.

        Liked by 1 person

      • skorzecin150 says:

        Colombian model. And yes, she talks like that woman on modern family. Off putting, but what are ya gonna do?

        Legit 35, m@rried only september last year to “social journalist” (whatever the hell that is) Juan Pablo Betancur. Second m@rriage. First of seven years to architect Alejandro Barreneche. Apparently cheated on the old husband with the new.

        NO children. Once again, a complete waste of a magnificent genes.

        Liked by 1 person

  11. the left wants our lives to be run by the dictates of sexual misfits who hate female beauty because they can’t compare and they can’t win it. sad. Think of the farm girl peasant dress of that chick from georgetown who wanted her pills. oh no, she can’t dress nice or pleasant…must be plain jane or else patriarchy’s eyes will oppress her.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Burner Prime says:

    The manopshere continues defining the problem even though it has already been clearly defined. Now we are just providing more and different examples that have the same root. Finally the ‘The Female Id: Raw And Uncut’ Twitter demonstrates what I have been saying: The overabundance of reproductive-age males/females is way too high, and the only remedy is the deaths of many millions of men. Even the thot gets it, and comes right out and unapologetically says it. If anyone calls her out on it, she will laugh, laying back getting hammered by some desperate man who thinks he’s an alpha for successfully getting in her pants.
    Men here and across the ‘sphere will be much better served preparing for the butchering and depravity that’s coming, rather than reading about the problem and getting more frustrated each day – and thinking the higher doses of the red pill will stave off the inevitable.
    I hope men here and across the ‘sphere will study what happened during the Balkan Wars (and not on Wikipedia) and learn its lessons. The Diversity will be the source of savagery never before experienced by Americans. We had it easy during WWI and II, in blissful untouched security. Next time chaos, death, and destruction will be on our front door. And don’t automatically think you will be the one perpetrating it.
    But the good news is you won’t have to game chicks anymore. You can rape the enemies’ women, or just ask your neighbor if she wants to hook up. She won’t play games during those chaotic times. Because both of you will know death could be right around the corner.

    Liked by 1 person

    • “The manosphere” now there’s a name I haven’t heard in a long, long time.

      Like

    • Tam the Bam says:

      As long as you bring nylons (stockings), lippy and cigs, you’ll be golden for scoring gash without having to hogtie and mutilate them. Not looking forward to the Ration coming back. It was still on for some things when I was tiny.
      Best things to cache are hard liquor, salt, and detergents/soaps of any kind. Detergents and disinfectants (particularly dishsoap/Dawn type stuff, poolshock bleach, iodine etc.) first, IMO, as I expect antibiotics to be unobtanium (no electric, no fridge). Bullets way down the list.
      Oh and have any even slightly suspect teeth taken out/implants right now, by a nice modern dentist who has novocaine. Or you’ll end up sticking a gun in your own mouth.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        TtB, across the sea, in Blarneyville, IrishSavant plays tennis with a 15yo…

        Like

      • Tam the Bam says:

        And long may it continue … a cousin had her first kid (don’t start, you septics; within wedlock!) age 16. Went to uni after she’d had four (giant) sons. Still goes rock climbing as a sport, but Abroad now, as it’s warm and dry. Fuck ice-picking and chocking your way up some windlashed remote Hielan’ cliff, not fun at our age.
        Tell him to give her one now, once he’s sorted it out with her old man and the priest. Kids are never a mistake. Money, status, property, rewarding pastimes, women, all can go in the dumpster and you’d never miss it, if you’re not an invalid or something. One’s own children are like health, if not better … just different class (/boomerchat)

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “Kids are never a mistake.”

        You got any pureblood 15yo girlzzzezes in your neck of the woods?

        Feeling the itch for another TtB Jr?

        Like

      • Tam the Bam says:

        No because I don’t want to leave them in the hands of some random woman and whoever she replaces me with. Bad enough she (they) gets my hootch and billfold unless I put it in some gnarly and fee-sucking trust arrangement.. I’m nearly as old as The God-Emperor hisself.
        Also I’d have to knock ‘er indoors on the head and stick her under the rhubarb, which would piss off my (bigger than me, I blame rationing) sons. And I kind of like the old girl.
        I’m waiting to play grandpa game. Got the Werther’s Originals loaded into the pockets of the beige cardie, ready to roll.

        Liked by 1 person

    • martin says:

      people are taking the words of some random, female, leftist, said on twitter, with far too much weight.

      Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      I see the war in Yugo as the closest likely model to what we will experience, Throw in Russia and China, maybe India into the mix. It will be neighbors killing neighbors.

      Liked by 1 person

  13. Mean Mr. Mustard says:

    Like

  14. Mean Mr. Mustard says:

    Like

    • oink says:

      Massa wagging his index at ((middle management))?!?

      But I thought, ((middle management)) wuz calling da shotz

      naw?

      Vat can I say? I’m shockt, shockt to find that puritanism is going on in here

      Like

    • oink says:

      Misus Abigail!

      Like

    • Scanman says:

      I don’t know who Abby Martin is but the fact that she describes reality on the ground in the West Bank but then states that she doesn’t believe that the Zionist lobby controls US politics is bizarre.

      Something is not quite right here.

      Monetary policy is the Rosetta Stone for deciphering world events and is obscurantist for a good reason.

      Like

  15. tryintogetthrumod says:

    CH you have to check out Courtland Sykes, running for Senate in Missouri. Article on CBS News. Sounds like he’s been reading you and taking your advice. Says “I’ll take Norman Rockwell and Gloria Steinem be damned”, says feminists have “snake-filled heads”, demands (and gets) dinner made by his fiancee every night at 6pm, and says he will train his future daughters to do the same. Trumpian policies of course, anti-immigration etc. And the most obvious shtlord physiognomy you will ever see.

    Like

  16. Amon Ra says:

    Since some of you mentioned this topic, I’d like to present the following story. Its from a participant of the Bosnian / Balkans war and has do deal with his thoughts on surviving through that experience, while besieged in a city for over a year, and the author shares many tips and suggestions. It is worth a read to see the potential future that most likely awaits us all in the US.

    Keep in mind that his situation was slightly more complex then the one that will be faced here, as all the participants in that conflict were almost identical to each other. The future conflict in the US will be strictly based along racial lines , for the most part, and will be utterly brutal and depraved, as we know what the shitskins are capable of. Please read:

    ” Bosnia War Survivor Warns of Things to Come in Collapse of America ”

    https://www.thesurvivalistblog.net/bosnia-war-survivor-warns-collapse-america/

    Like

    • Enfant Terrible says:

      That was interesting to read. I think a war is indeed coming to central Europe once again, and it’s going to be between Muslims and true Europeans. At some point, Islamists will want to take over, one way or another. France, Germany, and UK, actually have Muslims in the armed forces, and police, and once the war starts, those people will not be siding with Christians.

      Everyone should read that account, and take pointers from it.

      Like

  17. Lichthof says:

    https://m.facebook.com/jess537700?pn_ref=story

    I don’t know this person but the red pill gives you an insight. She is still very attractive but she settled for a weak beta below her smv.
    Her profile picture is her and her friends ..hubby did not make it and any pictures of her and the hubby…she is the man in body language.

    Like

  18. Amon Ra says:

    The BBC creates an accidental ” red pill ” .

    ” White too polite – how multiculturalism divided Britain ”

    Like

    • Scanman says:

      I don’t understand why these English and Swedes and French and Germans and Americans voted to bring these millions of foreigners from alien cultures into their countries.

      What? They didn’t?

      Then how did it happen?

      Like

      • martin says:

        honestly I think it was a mistake. Going back to the mid 90s when Tony Blair became the PM, there wasn’t really a concern about terror or immigration. The EU had made it easier to move around, perhaps to compete with America or copy it in some sense. The breakdown of borders and the naive view people had back then, combined with political correctness that prevented government workers from being able to acknowledge there was a problem meant people were unprepared for a huge number of people who came because they heard about the easy western life and living off the dole lifestyle. For years the government has talked about getting the number of migrants down but they can’t for various reasons. I believe that at least means they think a mistake was made.

        Like

      • Stake From Jake Jarm says:

        right, they woke up one day and they’re now a stranger in their own nation. And oops, by the way, these wogs are evil and explodey and rapey and drive bad BUT ,if you complain, you’ll go to jail and lose your job.

        how did it happen? Blair and Clinton getting paid off by saudis and sorors.

        Like

      • Tam the Bam says:

        In northern England it started because the (((textile industry))) had the ear of the post-war governments and didn’t want to pay a living wage to the former uncountable thousands of native spinners, weavers, finishers, etc. etc., as they were up against independent India (remember all that crap Ghandi pulled with his fake little spinning wheel?), US and the like, and were unwilling to ask for tariffs to stop dumping.

        London area pulled in Caribbean blacks specifically as strikebreakers and er, blacklegs (periodic London bus/Tube strikes etc.), hospital skivvies/nurses (State-paid so can never be cheap enough) and so on.

        Irish came in as construction/infrastructure peons willing to work for a shilling and a few cans of stout, “on the Lump” in vast numbers. There weren’t enough houses for all the demobbed “heroes” and their new families (me!) and there was a lot of squatting and occupation of e.g. empty military accom. by sizeable numbers of otherwise respectable, employed, married men with (and this is key) a fuckload of combat experience. Gov. shits bricks, as things were getting “tasty” (according to my old man), so chuck up absolute heaps of state housing, including commieblocks and vast “estates” of semis and row houses, using scab Mick labor.

        And no, no-one ever asked us.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Enfant Terrible says:

        They forgot the lessons of history.

        Expelling the Muslim out of the Iberian Peninsula was the KEY event that led to our modern world. Until the victorious Reconquista was complete, Islamic expansion was winning everywhere, and Islamic kingdoms were far more powerful and rich than European kingdoms could hope to be at that point.

        Once the Muslim was expelled from Western Europe altogether, everything changed. From then on, the west just kept on winning and winning, and growing and expanding, and then they let them back in, without having to.

        It’s mind boggling.

        Furthermore, when the different European powers had control over the middle-East, they were negligent in not completing the work started by the Crusaders. They let that Islamic pestilence continue to exist, instead of crushing it completely.

        Liked by 1 person

      • hans says:

        Are you really this dense?
        How did 8 years of Obama happen?
        What´s your guess on what would´ve happened by now if Hillary had won?

        WHAT would YOU be doing in that case?

        By some weird set of circumstances, some might even call it providence, Trump and his faction of the deep state are now US Prez. and a war is being waged FINALLY on “THE DESTROYERS”.

        THIS IS FOR SURVIVAL.

        Like

    • CalvinDecline says:

      Is there a part 2? Pretty interesting.

      Like

      • Amon Ra says:

        Yes there is. Its actually in the making now. It’s going to involve mass beheadings in Trafalgar Square. Tearing down of Stone Henge for being an idolatrous structure. Forced rapes and conversions of white women and children, and total destruction of western culture.

        Coming soon to a theater near you.

        Like

  19. martin says:

    I do kind of like the idea of tension caused by a conservative man with a lefty female. But the lefty sorts come with an awful lot of baggage now. These can include things like vast, ugly relationship history, tattoos and ugly hair styles, and pregnancies which either lead to being a single mother or an abortion. Neither of these is good, but singling out abortions, since that woman on the other page had one, I can think of nothing less sexy. That doesn’t mean single motherhood is good for anyone but I don’t care how attractive some woman is, an abortion is so grotesque I wouldn’t be able to get over that.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Ab0rtion isn’t grotesque, it’s EVIL.

      The Single M0m might be nuts, but at least she chose LIFE.

      Liked by 3 people

      • plumpjack says:

        Cap, to what extent is fetus-culling hamster-driven eugenics?

        and if it is, what effect would it have on our species’ genetic fitness?

        IOW, what’s happening to our stock if ruthless women are generally aborting the fetuses of inferior men, but carrying to term the fetuses of shitlords?

        just playing satan’s advocate here…

        Liked by 2 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        PJ, if you believe Audacious Epigone’s statistics [G0ad-Emperor/thecunt == (16yo White Boys 86/14) && (16 yo White G!rlz 70/30)], then as early as the year 2000, no more than about 15% to 20% of all pureblood White b!rths were to Sh!tlib Wh!te m0thers.

        So yes, there are probably some seriously ph*cked up genetics being produced from crazy nutjob White sh!tlib girlzzzezes pushing out b@stards sired by Dark Triad Psychopaths [similar to e.g. the genetic witch’s brew which William Jefferson Blythe Clinton inherited from whomever his biological f@ther was, with his mother, Virginia Dell Blythe Clinton Dwire Kelley, having been obviously nuts], but percentage wise, these b!rths seem to be an increasingly tiny fraction of all White b!rths.

        So as of about 2000, you’re looking at, say, 80% of all White b!rths coming from the relatively sane, and only about 20% of White b!rths being much more likely to produce the kinds of monsters whom we need to keep an eye on.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        If you go back about 14 essays [CH has been on fire lately], to “The Virgin Tea Candle Vs The Chad Tiki Torch” [January 22, 2018; by CH], I was a little worried by some of the faces which I saw on the boys:

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Those boys are probably more like 20yo to 25yo, born circa 1992-1997, but to me, they sure don’t look like happy-go-lucky goofy soy-boy pushovers – they look like they’re carrying a lot of Darkness in their hearts, and they also look like they’re True Believers.

        That MIGHT be the kinda personality you get when a Dark Triad Psychopath sires a boy who is then raised by a batsh!t ph*cking insane single Wh!te m0ther.

        Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        interesting stuff, cap. gonna have to marinate on that for a bit. things are getting weird.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        By contrast, @missmayn’s gheyphag bff looks moar like a caricature of a young man. [I’m pretty sure it’s a joke on her part – the poor guy is obviously a s0d0miite.]

        Liked by 1 person

      • hans says:

        Very astute observation Cap. THIS IS the face of our DIRECT enemy.
        Make no mistake about it, they´re already chomping at the bits to go out into the night as communist death squads.
        Murdering “naziii” families.

        And they also will be the first to betray their so called “humanism/liberalism” and become Muslims themselves.
        Just to save their own asses.

        Like

      • hans says:

        Meant the pussy hat guys of course.
        And here´s their hero and what they actually admire him for.

        Like

  20. A jump rope
    A public pool
    A pull up bar
    1-1.6g of protein per kg of body weight

    I’ve concluded that this is literally all a soyboy needs to quadruple his testosterone and fuckability

    Like

    • Sun Tzu says:

      I always thought soyboy is more of a mindset than muscle mass. Accompanying soyboy is always shit about feminism, Obama stickers and gun control.

      Like

    • Amon Ra says:

      You’re not doing yourself any favors by having “vibrants” as your profile picture on here. Are you really that freaking clueless ?

      Like

    • Tam the Bam says:

      Guess it helps to be unemployed then. Gives you time to get through enough of that to make a difference, and you won’t Utterly Fucked after a day on site in winter.. Carry on.

      Like

  21. […] The current Western sexual market is riven with submissive man<–>dominant woman couples, which doesn’t bode well. It’s why assortative mating along arid criteria like credentials and political ideology are the norm now instead of the exception, and why mating along hot wet passionate criteria like masculine-feminine frisson and provider-nurturer sex-based roles is becoming less the norm and more the exceptional act of rebellion. Hard times will bring back the ideal Darwinian bond of strong men coupling with submissive women. https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2018/01/25/beautiful-truth-of-the-day-sexual-polarity/ […]

    Like

  22. Amon Ra says:

    Please don’t do it Trump ! Please !!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sean Fielding says:

      Queen Ann doesn’t use the p-word when prodding Trump and she’s a barren female. Ban from vocab.

      Like

  23. horn says:

    Assortive mating was discussed in great detail almost 25 years ago in The Bell Curve. Nothing new there.

    Like

Leave a Reply