Recently, researchers have discovered what yer ‘umble proprietor of this scandalous Chateau was telling you long long time: chicks dig violent, rape-y, dominating sex because it is in the nature of women to feel incredibly aroused submitting to a powerful, even sadistic, man, and this feeling is universal among women.
Credentialist (((cipher))), 2017:
The popular feminist narrative would have you believe that porn is largely consumed by men, and that depictions of violent — or at least rough — sex would be a primarily male-dominated interest.
This is untrue, states researcher Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, who says that porn featuring violence against women is significantly more popular among women compared to men. […]
“The rate at which women watch violent porn is roughly the same in every part of the world. It isn’t correlated with how women are treated,” he stated.
Perspicacious Heartiste, 2010:
Romance novels, read almost entirely by women, are flush full of rape fantasies. If fantasy (or as I like to call it, “hyperreality”) didn’t reflect reality then we would hear and read of fantasies by women featuring beta males, short dweebs, nerdos, fatsos, and charmless stutterers in the role of desired man. But we don’t. Women’s fantasies, like men’s fantasies, provide a window into a wished-for reality where all options are available, all choice catered to, all desires quenched. Rape fantasy, despite the protestations to the contrary of the “fantasy is different than reality” crowd, is as much a reflection of real female desire as any other form of sexual fantasy.
Women fantasize about a lot of things that no one argues don’t reflect reality if that reality were an option. What fantasizing woman wouldn’t truly want to be a princess who gets swept off her feet by a prince living in a castle? What single woman who dreams it wouldn’t sleep with Johnny Depp in real life if he propositioned her? These are common fantasies of women which they never argue aren’t reflections of how they wish reality were. So why should we grant a plenary indulgence to rape fantasies? How is it that rape fantasy is the one glaring exception to the reality-reflection rule? Men also fantasize about stuff like threesomes with supermodels, but no one in their right mind would argue that men don’t actually want threesomes with supermodels in reality, if having them were possible. (Wives or girlfriends, don’t bother asking your partners. You won’t get an honest answer.) […]
Rape fantasy reflects a deep, inborn, uncompromising sexual desire by women to be rendered helpless, almost childlike, by a more powerful man. It is the submissive scrawling of their hindbrains, a message in a novel sailing forth from the female limbic labyrinth. And from submission to a dominant male force is born the strongest love.
I loved that he was so powerful I was nothing.
– ODoes this mean women would be sexually turned on by real life rape? It is a question not so easily dismissed when we begin to examine closely the sexual fantasies of women. Dismissed it is, though, because no one — man or woman — wants to creak open the vault door that houses such primeval female decadence. For if women do harbor secret desires for dark seductions, then what is left of the pretext to chivalry? Women benefit from some amount of cultural pedestalization. *Societies* benefit. There is no room in a healthy, functioning society for mischievous inquisitors to lay bare the true soul of woman.
If you want to read the raw uncut ugly truths about women before they’re regurgitated in opaque chunks by big data nerds and media whores years later, you read at Chateau Heartiste. Accept no substitute.
This is why I cry havoc and let slip the raw dogs of whore.
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] Chicks Dig Violent Porn […]
LikeLike
I have plenty of anecdotes about the fantasy behavior of *adult* women, but I think it’s unwise to go into detail, given the possible presence of investigators (hey, go after NAMBLA).
Suffice it to say, the majority of *adult* women enjoy rough, forceful sex, and the act of being dominated, though they may not directly admit it.
LikeLike
Dark truth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dark seductions – hmm
Heartiste wrote the above somewhat before Swedish women made clear to their Beta cuntrymen that in a sexual emergency they preferred ‘Rapists rather than Racists.
LikeLiked by 3 people
So be both
LikeLike
I guess it’s about time for western men to stop giving a fuck what women want or think they want.
Easier said the done because the long-term costs of pro-civilization monogamy is a population of beta white knights.
LikeLike
I remember reading a book called Bad Boys – Why we love them and how to know when to leave them or something to that effect, by a lady psychologist by the name of Carole (((Lieberman))).
In her book, Dr. Lieberman uses archetypes from fairy tales to describe different types of men women are attracted to.
The basic gist of all of it is that women want their d@ds to r@pe them, thereby ‘taking him away’ from their main rival, who is their mother.
Sick sh1t.
If Dr. Lieberman is only partially correct, the minds of women are the deepest, darkest dungeons ever devised and the fact that those creatures are responsible for bearing (and raising !!!!) our young is the cruelest joke this side of a Black Widow cocooning her mate as food for her young.
Btw, Harlequin books have an ‘adventure’ (= male) division by the name of Gold Eagle.
LikeLike
Now why would you read that unless you are a woman
LikeLike
Research.
Know thy enemy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rape is a hugely common subject of female-centric erotica. Fifteen minutes on any mainstream website for this stuff can prove that.
Take AO3. A quick search of the tags reveals the following number of stories
“Past child abuse” – 6,249
“Slavery” – 10,028
“Rape” – 12,832
“Implied/Referenced Non-Con” – 12,483
“Rough sex” – 23,268
“Child Abuse” – 23,634
“Dubious consent” – 34,624
“Incest” – 35,281
“Rape/non-Con elements” – 44,052
“Abuse” – 58,752
“Rape/Non-Con” content warning – 73,484
And that’s just the stuff that’s been tagged properly, and isn’t super weird. There is a lot of very sick shit out there that some women really enjoy, from baby-rape to literal torture porn. Why, I have no idea.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perhaps chivalric notions were created to protect MEN from the sanity-blasting reality of women’s Lovecraftian desires and nature? Enabled them to think of women as sweet and fragile damsels, and thus pair-bond with them…
… rather than looking at them and thinking “what horrific darkness is screaming and chortling behind those clear blue eyes?”
LikeLike
Very interesting, some weeks ago I was wondering if men´s brain evolved to idealize women in order to block the reality about their dark and sick true nature.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Men are the real romantics and they pay mightily for their delusions.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Y u want some good…
LikeLike
Not sure I’ve ever met any semi-attractive women who weren’t abused as ch1ldr3n – or at least claimed they were.
LikeLiked by 1 person
this is true. all of the hottest, most sexually attractive women I’ve known had a very early first sex experience, most often with a close acquaintance or family member.
the percentage of young women who who are spoiled early is staggering. and I’m talking about good looking, smart, beautiful, Aryan women who have the potential to be perfect w1ves, ruined before they even left the house. (the butterfaces miraculously seem to survive the pre-teen nubility inner circle-gauntlet mostly unscathed.)
I’m guessing that inner circle rape was a significant force throughout humans’ evolutionary history, is possibly one concern that led to more prudent and realistic families m@rrying their daughters off young. like REALLY young, at the first sign of flowering.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great quant contribution. The internet is our collective id laid bare. The Idternet.
Twitter especially is exposing hair-trigger journalists for the FUCK YOU DAD adolescents they psychologically are just under the surface. They all but say it out loud. I have such a thing for Katy Tur, who must personally cover Trump while suffering under the very public humiliation of having a toughguy tranny dad. The possibilities of psychic manipulation are endless.
Here’s the thing. No confessor of long experience would be unfamiliar with that litany of wicked influences that even the most pious bluehairs are subject to — especially in this degenerate culture that positively promotes an exploration of deviancy. Only the west had the wisdom to make a sacrament out of the defense against and elimination of these psychological showstoppers in confession. We had the perspicacity to personify those influences as demons, the better to separate them out, battle them, literally exorcise them, and recover a true self underneath that keeps no company with such destructive figments.
Instead, today, the typical woman (and man) shuffles around with these corrosive but naturally occurring influences inside them. They seek an anonymous outlet online just as their Christian ancestors did via the blind confessional. The arrangement hardly suffices, and in their despair they merge with the demonic and lose their way forever. Which is the definition of hell.
LikeLike
I do find Katy somewhat attractive. I could spare 15, 20 minutes with her.
LikeLike
“They seek an anonymous outlet online just as their Christian ancestors did via the blind confessional”
That’s a good thought. One thing I’ve noticed about damaged women (and some men, too) is how much they write, and it’s always confessional and always really really loooong. It’s a dead giveaway. Take a look at a group of girlfriends on Faceberg, if you can stand it. The mental ones always write shitlong posts. They’re also the ones who send emails or even texts that are like novellas. The healthier ones write short, quick, to the point.
LikeLike
((( THEY ))) were certainly not immune, even from N*zi stalag porn, which was so popular the Israeil govt banned it: http://flashbak.com/the-gonzo-insanity-of-1960s-israeli-holocaust-porn-377523/
LikeLiked by 1 person
So? Just because men dig violent, action films doesn’t we mean want, let alone enjoy, to be fighting others for our lives in real life.
LikeLike
Except we do. Because we must.
LikeLike
Exactly. Every man by definition wants not just to be in a fight but in a real fight that means something real. We only accept sports and video games and movies (and online trolling) as a crack-like substitute for true glory.
LikeLike
My roommate was bringing up something along those lines, about fighting for something real
He had seen the film The Alamo and there was a realization that came to him, being that many of those men knew they were going to die, but dammit, it was important and it meant something. There was a purpose to it. It was real
The guy’s at a crossroads in his life, questioning past decisions, and where he wants to move forward and something in that film spoke to him.
LikeLike
anything worth having is worth fighting for. and anything attained without struggle generally can be lost or taken away without much struggle.
LikeLike
wtf are u g@y (?) yes we do lol
?!?possible women?!?
LikeLike
If you can find a copy, I recommend “Endless Rapture: Rape, Romance, and the Female Imagination”, by Dr Helen Hazen.
LikeLike
I remember some stormer guy talking about how he made some feminist woman to say “i’m strong and independent woman” while she was on her knees gagging on his cock. Funny story, not sure if its true.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Now that’s a fap-worthy image…
LikeLike
“Not sure if it is true”? It is the deepest truth, literally and figuratively.
LikeLike
Moreover, to teach women wisdom you have to sexualize the logos to some degree. To literally and figuratively “swallow” the “wisdom” or red pill. (I’d tread carefully because the deviants have sexualized and politicized everything out of a hatred of the beautiful, so it won’t do to wallow in the crotch cheese of their besleazed imagination.)
This is such a fine art, there is such a fine line between seductive master and creepy omega molester that we would all be safest to avoid the gray area altogether (the beta strategy). And yet that very safety is a demoisturizer destined to deaden all tingles and thereby kill any chance of direct feminine enlightenment. All things considered, err on the side of taking chances against the anti-slut defense and retroactive regret on the principle of nothing ventured, nothing gained. If you go at the queen you must slay her: if you’re going to dabble in rape, you’d better rape her mind at the same time.
The key is to establish for her a connection between sheets and streets, even if it’s only a private sensation, to lay bare the contradiction between empowered woman and submissive slut in her waking mind, and to slowly force a blurring of distinctions throughout the relationship until she is forced to choose between the artifice of ideologies inherited from shrews and the indelible memories of being agreeably manhandled. At the limit, a man can accomplish this in a single encounter.
LikeLike
“At the limit, a man can accomplish this in a single encounter.”
LikeLike
Let me take you on a trip
Around the world and back
And you won’t have to move
You just sit still
Now let your mind do the walking
And let my body do the talking
Let me show you the world in my eyes
I’ll take you to the highest mountain
To the depths of the deepest sea
We won’t need a map, believe me
Now let my body do the moving
And let my hands do the soothing
Let me show you the world in my eyes
That’s all there is
Nothing more than you can feel now
That’s all there is
Let me put you on a ship
On a long, long trip
Your lips close to my lips
All the islands in the ocean
All the heaven’s in the motion
Let me show you the world in my eyes
That’s all there is
Nothing more than you can touch now
That’s all there is
Let me show you the world in my eyes
LikeLike
All we need now is Richard Spencer doing the karaoke version
LikeLike
That Violator albums was one of the best albums to come out of the 90s.
Those synth beats are hauntingly memorable.
LikeLike
I liked Ultra.
Dark stuff.
LikeLike
No romance novel ever began with, “I said ‘NO!” and he stopped.”
LikeLike
Damn, so that’s why mine flopped.
LikeLike
FWIW, my GF loves being “stalked.” She also likes a good physical scuffle. And I can’t say I mind providing such stuff.
LikeLike
Those bodice-ripping novels of which you speak are a good indication that no matter how many women consume pornography, it’s primarily made for men. That’s why it notably lacks what gives women the tingles, like flirtation, romance, soap opera storylines, etc. Most porn is lousy at that stuff. It doesn’t even have attractive men, usually, but rather ones with the physiological tools to get the job done. (The women aren’t particularly attractive, either, but men are willing to trade attraction for visual depiction of sex acts, which beautiful women are reticent to do on camera for obvious reasons.)
This basic fact misleads feminists, who are fond of misleading themselves, into thinking everything about porn is made to please men, which is untrue though not grossly unreasonable. But then there’s the related assumption that things depicted in porn are uniquely appealing to men, simply because they’re in porn. Which is not only false but stupid.
Rough sex probably appeals to most men, at least in some form some of the time. For the subset of men who fetishize it, it’s highly appealing. But women in general are much more interested in it than men in general, I find. Submission is inherent to their sexual make-up, unless they’re perverts.
LikeLike