The plastic surgery industry wouldn’t exist if there wasn’t an objective standard of beauty.
Think about it.
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
The only difference between the stranger creepily staring at you every day on the train or bus, and the Flock cameras recording your every moment is that you can't see the human staring at your Flock dossier.
This layer of opacity between creepiness and human face explains why so many people are cavalier about the Flock spying network. They could get over their indifference quickly if they practice visualizing the feds, faggots, yids, and nerdos retrieving the data streams at the other end of the Flock camera.
-
Imagine every time you ride a bus or a train, you look over your shoulder and two seats back a stranger is staring at you hard.
You look again a few minutes later, and he is still staring, but takes a break to jot something in a notebook before staring again.
This happens every day, every time you ride mass transit. Sometimes it is the same person. Sometimes a different person.
After a week of this, you are so creeped out that you confront the stranger staring at you. He says "I have a right to stare at you."
Congratulations, that is what it will feel like when your society is fully Flocked.
-
High trust societies don't need mass surveillance.
Low trust societies enrich the merchants of mass surveillance.
Ergo, the merchants of mass surveillance want your society turned into a low trust multiracial dystopia. -
I've heard some really bad pro-Flock rationalizations lately.
"If you aren't doing anything bad, you have nothing to worry about."
Maybe I just don't like government and corporations spying on me wherever I go? Or maybe I should worry about the government deciding that the perfectly legal stuff I'm doing today is illegal tomorrow.
"You don't want the mass surveillance because you want the option to do something bad."
I want the option to buy a fucking cup of coffee without ten different state and federal agencies and their corporate partners knowing which creamer I used.
"You worry about Flock, but you already live in a society where everyone has personal smartphones with cameras that can spy on you."
Sure, I don't like that, but if you find yourself in a hole, you don't keep digging.
-
cue charlie brown teacher noises
-
Propaganda ministers don't create the racial divisions. They only exploit those naturally existing divisions.
-
I can't shake the idea that the rapid lurch toward anti-racism during the civil rights era succeeded as wildly as it did because two forces combined to develop it:
jewish ethnocentric malice + White ownership class greed
jewish subversion of White America would not have met as much success had there not been a greedy White overclass to cosign an economic restructuring that favored cheap labor and rising asset values.
The analogy of anti-discrimination laws to historical blasphemy laws is interesting, but falls short in one critical respect. Blasphemy laws were created with the intention of maintaining cross-class social cohesion. Anti-discrimination laws were created to guarantee the continuity of the System, which had become increasingly reliant on the perpetual rule of a credentialed class that wanted to prevent challenges to its rule from socially mobile sub-elites.
What needs to happen -- and which I have devoted some energy to fulfilling -- is the creation of a powerful moral vocabulary that counters the rhetoric of the Equalists. We must move the sympathies of our people back to where it belongs, for our people.
-
I have a theory that this dynamic explains Fermi's Paradox.
-
Being good at something you love is a blessing.
Being bad at something you love is a curse.
Being good at something you hate is a prison.
Being bad at something you hate is a reassurance. -
I predicted Trump would blame Iran for election meddling. But China fills the role just as well.
Trump has become Hillary Clinton. Lock him up.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
Deep Thots, courtesy of CH. I can dig it.
What a world
LikeLike
Women blame men for everything. In doing so they acknowledge that men are the responsible parties and thus the natural position of men is to be in command of women.
That porn epitomizes the standard of beauty in women is proved by the fact that fat-woman porn is a fetish on par with granny-sex porn.
With plastic surgery, it’s the fact that all the procedures are to make women skinnier, give them bigger boobs, get rid of their (((huge))) noses, make their faces more angular, get rid of the wrinkles that demonstrate an age-related loss of fertility, etc. The plastic surgery industry exists because there is a standard of beauty. All it takes is to look at the popular procedures to understand what the standard of beauty is.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“…get rid of their (((huge))) noses.”
I liked how you squeezed the Jews into that one.
LikeLike
But Tattoo parlors exist also…
[CH: 37 pieces of flair is less a beauty addition (or subtraction) than it is a slut signal in a sexually roving social order.]
LikeLike
LikeLike
Real life tattoo on a google woman in my town, in big letters across her chest: Dam Dat Bitch.
LikeLike
Tattoos on chicks… “slut flair”.
LikeLike
Axiomatically true statement which proves the existence of SMV
LikeLike
I swear to god I had the exact same thought today. More specifically, if beauty standards didn’t exist, why does every “Instagram model” (read: Saudi toilet) use fillers and other artificial SMV boosters?
LikeLike
I assume you know about plastic surgeon Stephen Marquart and his “ideal facial proportions” mask?
He claims to have based it on the golden ratio. It has merit.
LikeLike
I’m currently wearing beer goggles, but I don’t think I’m out of line in judging this a move from 6 to 8.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it fucked up her nose.
LikeLike
IDK. Try going right to left. Does her nose improve?
LikeLike
No.
LikeLike
6?
LikeLike
Hey, I said beer goggles. Now sober, I lower each score by 1.
LikeLike
Is the middle pic her surgery scars?
LikeLike
[…] Source link […]
LikeLike