Feed on
Posts
Comments

A reader can barely contain his (her?) excitement.

Holy cow, CH! Do you realize what a smash a “rise of the sex robots” movie would be? How prophetic, how powerful,  how promotional of shiv-right values? I hope you’ve got something in the works, or at least a treatment copyrighted. Nobody has foreseen the dystopian ramifications the way you have,  as far as I know. Nobody is better talented to tell the tale. And certainly nobody deserves more to profit from his unique insights. Get scribing, my man!

M7

I preen. It’s funny you should mention this now, M7, because I’ve recently been mulling the idea of a dystopian fright-fi book about a lovelorn beta male who genuinely falls in love with his Class Sharapova sexbot, and whose satiation tragically compels him to spurn the surprising affection of a flesh and blood plain jane who yearns for a family. My idea was for the story to focus on the uncanny intimacy that develops between the two main characters as their love (or maybe just his love, as the AI would not have yet progressed to undetectable emulation of human emotion), disturbing in concept yet tender in execution, pulses against a backdrop of civilization rapidly yielding to a cataclysmic sex market disruption that dwarfs the schism online porn and obesity had caused the prior generation.

It’s not like the real world isn’t serving up daily reminders that sexbots are coming, sooner than we care to think.

Certainly there have been a few movies that have tackled this subject, if tangentially or farcically. Her, Austin Powers, Blade Runner, Cherry 2000, The Stepford Wives, and the underrated indie psych-thriller Ex Machina come to mind. But none of these movies, except maybe Her and Ex Machina, really explored the sensual and psychological possibilities of sexbot love in context with the cultural upheaval that sexbots would doubtlessly unleash on advanced hedonistic civilizations. That’s where I hope to fill the gap, so to speak.

95 Responses to “Sexbot: The Movie (The Book) ((The Fourth Horseman))”

    • savantissimo says:

      “.”?
      I don’t get the point. Are you trying to say you’re on your period? Maybe just a dothead, but I don’t want to caste aspersions.

      *

      Back to sexbots – I think VR is going to be the main fap focus. It’s easier to get the look perfect and to have variety. The robot part may be just a pelvic peripheral and haptic gloves.

      Another, squickier possibility is the fleshbot – take an embryo, perhaps a clone and at the earliest stage that the cells that will become only the brain are identifiable, replace them with the equivalent cells from a pig or primate that has been genetically engineered for histocompatibility. Now what you’ve got is a tissue culture that will never become legally human since it will never have a human brain. Gestate it in a surrogate mother, or a histocompatible sow that has had a human uterus transplant, or in another fleshbot. Shortly after delivery, dust the surface of the brain, including the inner surfaces in the limbic system with millions of microelectrodes that can monitor and stimulate the brain, giving complete control over it to a weak AI that trains it. At first the AI will run on an external computer, but might be implanted later. An implant in the sinuses with a bundle of micro-cannulae to deliver hormonal and neurotransmitter stimulation to different parts of the brain would complete the control.

      The downside is it would take a long time to grow, but I think the demand would be there. After they approach the wall, they can be used as surrogate mothers or actual mothers, or their organs can be harvested.

      Like

    • VolteFace says:

      If they haven’t been mentioned already: “Humans” a UK tv series remake of Swedish tv series “Real Humans”.

      Like

  1. […] Sexbot: The Movie (The Book) ((The Fourth Horseman)) […]

    Like

  2. Forays In Fiction says:

    Yay!!! Go for it 🙂

    Really enjoyed both Her and Ex Machina. A revisit of AI (Jude Law played a convincing sexbot) might help inspire. There was one bot on the BBC show “Humans” that was being used as a prostitute. Actually, *spoiler alert* a second one was used for sex once also. You’d only need to watch the first few episodes to get some ideas, although you’ll probably want to see the entire season because it was good.

    Like

  3. Ponce du Lion says:

    Yeah but any sociosexual dystopian future book should also contain artificial wombs themes.
    Ex machina was surprisingly good. There are two or so intelligent conversations and beta gets killed.

    Like

  4. Spielberg’s A.I. featured a male sexbot, “Gigolo Joe,” for lonely women.

    [CH: for reasons I have expounded on before, male sexbots won’t be a thing….at least not until well after female sexbots have established a firm (heh) foothold in the consumer market. this partly explains why the movie AI didn’t become a cult sensation.]

    Like

    • Haven M. says:

      kitty cats are substitutes for children…so why can’t substitutes for men also be vague psuedo replacements? most wimmin only want someone to bitch at for a couple of hours about stupid shit.

      Gigalo Joe only has to nod in agreement for an hour and then initate sex.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        > “so why can’t substitutes for men also be vague psuedo replacements?” ——— Because you’re gonna hafta program the bot with a sense of humor. He11, a top-notch bot would have to know GAME to keep the beeyotch completely “happy”.

        Like

      • Random Guy says:

        Knowing game wouldn’t be that hard for a robot. Just program in your basic programs, psychology books, game books, books on how to sell. Etc…..and so on.
        Enough memory to contain everything they get to know plus what they pick up on the way via observation and program them to only acknowledge what seems to work.
        Biggest problem with game for humans is having to throw out everything you’ve been told growing up and the emotional aspects of it. Sex-bots got neither of those issues.
        Even humor; download a few books, studies and all the movies and they can make their own algorithms from them. Maybe some kind of devices that can detect if they are emitted the right pheromones etc….
        Sex-bots aren’t the problem of the future, guys actually like company.
        Husband-bots are the problem of the future, how can women go back to interacting with normal human beings with they have Joe Perfect interacting with them and doing things with them all the time?

        Like

      • peppermint says:

        Husband-bots are the problem of the future, how can women go back to interacting with normal human beings with they have Joe Perfect interacting with them and doing things with them all the time?

        …you must be new here

        Like

      • Haven M. says:

        I think we’re overestimating the needs of the lonely.

        Like

      • Haven M. says:

        that was “Brownie Husband” on SNL

        Like

    • whorefinder says:

      Which was hilarious, because it was clearly an attempt by Spielberg/Kubrick to cover for the fact that female sex bots will be all the rage. At one point when introduced Gigolo Joe crosses path with a female sexbot called “Gigolo Jane” or something to that effect, and they acknowledge each other in passing, but then she disappears from the story.

      Women won’t use sexbots, they’ll use sexless pop tarts who tell them how wonderful they are all day.

      Like

      • mendo says:

        If Kubrick had made that film it would have been greater and touched on more themes of the human condition than was (((Spielberg))) tried. And I’m sure the sexbots angle would have been fleshed out greater instead making Gigolo Joe a toy robot/surrogate father to David.

        “I’m in bad trouble”

        Like

    • Reb says:

      AI will take over our entire lives. Technology is helping us evolve.

      Like

  5. You’re one set of parentheses away from sexbots who lie there thinking about what color to paint the ceiling.

    [CH: for real tho you don’t think life-like sexbots will have a major impact on the functioning of society? or do you just not believe they’re crashing the party any time soon? the latter is a more defensible position.

    ps it just dawned on me that i may be misunderstanding your comment. in which case, carry on carrying on.]

    Like

    • Haven M. says:

      *hink life-like sexbots will have a major impact on the functioning of society*

      like anyother environment where men have smv advantage, the result will be women slutting it up to get scarcer men resources. This only applies to top tier, of course. Everyone else:

      men: more ‘baitin.
      women: more blue hair dye.

      But then I think of old folk homes where viagra has been introduced. Everyone fucking up in there. Compare that to frat life now where most dorks are surrounded by slutopia that they can never, ever touch.

      Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      > “You’re one set of parentheses away from” ——— What does a (((Sexbot American Princess))) do during sex? (((Its)))) nails.

      Like

    • Lol yeah just the old joke about Jewish girls being shitty in bed, a propos of the parentheses.

      I dunno what effect sexbots will have; I can’t predict shit. Doesn’t matter. Let’s go Covington already.

      Like

  6. trafe says:

    Uhh… you’re telling me you’ve never heard of the Ryan Gosling classic: “Lars and the Real Girl”?

    [CH: not until now. must-see?]

    Like

    • trafe says:

      I think Ryan Gosling has a subtle habit of choosing movies very inconsistent with his excessively hipster liberal views… it’s only a must see if you like watching a very sad story of an omega succumb to the love of a sex doll.. love, not sex. Of course it’s hidden behind the veil of a “delusional” young man in an attempt to be bitter-sweet.

      Liked by 1 person

    • uh says:

      i think it takes place in minnesota, and have a theory that that was done unconsciously on purpose, it being whiter / duller there, so they could stretch out their improbable bullshit plot without the dindu factor disrupting the fantasy.

      in that way it reminded me of a scene from amelie, where the protag bitch is walking through the paris metro terminal and is catcalled by some mixed-race cads, to which she is totally oblivious. the director must have done it on purpose, but it unintentionally demonstrates that bourgie white girls are living in an alternate reality that overlaps with the one collapsing around them.

      sexbots might be a thing for those who can afford them, but it might drive down the cost of lifelike sex dolls, so that’s cool.

      Like

      • “have a theory that that was done unconsciously on purpose,”

        lolzlzl cool Freudian slip, sis

        “it being whiter / duller there”

        so you say, Sarah!

        Now why don’t you take the Ambien and let Wrong Side of History have a turn?

        Like

      • Uh says:

        You’re literally trolling the sidebar for my comments, bud. Go look in the mirror and ask yourself if that’s the kind of man you want to be.

        Like

      • You’re literally here when your petticoats have been jerked down around your ankles months ago, (((sweetheart))).

        This is a gentleman’s club. Tit pics or get your sweaty digits off the netz, Saruh.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I think uh is upset that he can’t slip in his little antiWhite neener-neeners without getting called on ’em.

        Cases in point,

        1. already pointed out by Lucious: “whiter/duller… without dindu factor disrupting the fantasy”… cuck fetishism, or perhaps sticking up for his own kind, since below he seems to say “White woman” in a derogatory fashion.

        2. calls the absolutely charming actress in Amelie “bitch”, and the reason she totally ignores shitskin cat-calling is because director is “unintentionally” showing how boojie white girls (there it is again!) are living in an ‘alternate reality’… rather than the simple explanation, witnesses dozens of times a day in every city of the world where said shitskins catcall, that there are actually white women out there unimpressed by the antics and chaste and refined enough not to give the assholes any notice or satisfaction.

        uh, the others have done you a disservice by accusing you of (((you-know-what)))… my impression (which I may have stated in much earlier threads) is that you’re a racial mischling, just short of the proverbial talented tenth, who has been snubbed early and often by the white women you dismiss as oblivious bitches.

        Like

      • llozlzolLZLOZL omg whud uh perdickuhmant!!!

        Well, Saruh, you heard the man! The noble Greg Eliot has set forth his case– and I do not scruple to confess, his theory is well-grounded and once upon a time held sway in my own mind.

        But then, I cannot forget the shrieking “omgZ I can’t stand going back to facebook all duh yellow waifus of duh ALTREICT” display you made of yourself. Petticoat jewctun, votes I.

        Either way, “uh”, you lurve the attention so much, you just had to cum crawling back to your own vomit when nobody wants you. You’re looking at the exhibitionist in the mirror. So speak now, or forever hold your clit hood:

        (((Titz))) or “muh dick”?

        Like

      • uh says:

        Greg,

        You missed your chance to run your mouth to me in person. Because you’re chickenshit.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Strong words from the safety of your keyboard… I do not fear, nor drink, with strangers known only over the internet whose health is questionable and whose views are not sympatico.

        You’ve been told this before, yet continue the neener-neener of the old canard… and then wonder why no one will click mugs with you.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

      • Saruh, you took your chance mouthing off your Cultural Studies pabulum and “frank personal confessions” among an audience of your betters, and all you succeeded in doing was strangling your poor tongue in your petticoats.

        It really says something that “The Spirit Within” at least manages more consistency of voice.

        With all respect to Greg, your little “let’s you and him fight” routines belie these silly butch pretensions. It’s hilarious how a natural blathermouth like you thinks she can “lower her tone”, as it were, simply by going laconic. OMG how can Mr. Heartiste stand for this cruel mistreatment of poor Saruh lozlzozolzozlz!!!! Why won’t he HELP you, you poor lardass (((Aryan youth))), you!! lozlz

        Though Greg, sage as ever, probably has grasped a part of the truth I hadn’t bothered to comtemplate before.

        You aren’t, perchance, fucking a mischling are you dear? What did the rabbi say?

        Never mind what the rabbi would say if it knew how thickheaded you’re determined to be just in the hope of winning a Nazi hate fuck from someone, anyone . . . .

        Like

  7. Glengarry says:

    The SWPL sexbot: Her + fleshlight attachment.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. There is a market need for a sexbot novel that actually addresses the ramifications of a functional sexbot in a real way. There are plenty of SF books, and shows that have them. Humans second season is returning soon and HBO is going to have Westworld this fall, but there has not been a realistic treatment of what the impact on the sexual marketplace would be.

    Primarily because there isn’t a conscious acknowledgement that there is one (although people’s behavior seems to indicate there is).

    Liked by 1 person

    • Haven M. says:

      Didn’t Robots of Dawn talk about this? The lady fell in love with the male robot and then it killed itself.

      Like

      • tteclod says:

        You misremember. The mindreading robot, actually superior to the male sexbot (humaniform), killed it for other reasons. In later novels, that robot-murdering robot edits its own programming to include “ends justify the means” rules.

        Like

  9. Doktor Jeep says:

    Who would have known that Cherry 2000 was a prophecy and not fiction?

    Liked by 1 person

  10. While waiting for the sexbots to arrive, why not legalize prostitution in the meantime? Granted, this goes against everything game teaches. But betas need to get laid. And no beta will ever become an Alpha. The best he can hope for is lesser jerkboy. Until he reaches this goal, some pretty whores will do just fine to help him maintain his sanity.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. mendo says:

    Isn’t the new HBO series Westworld exploring this somewhat? Not sure if it is based at all on Chrichton’s (I believe?) novel, but it is about automatons and sexbots. Or was that a dream I had? Dammit all.

    Then again, Futurama touched on this. With Lucy Lui. (Who?)

    Instead of Eay, Pray, Love, it an be: Code, Bone, Die.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. GB says:

    Yeah the ‘don’t date robots’ joke info film in that futurama episode covers it all.

    Like

  13. uh says:

    kellyanne conway, trump’s new campaign advisor … WOULD YOU BANG?

    Like

  14. Bob says:

    Ex Machina was one sly doublecross short of being a great movie on the subject, like Black Mirror always seems to provide.

    What about Boxing Helena? It it almost the perfect anti-sexbot movie. An otherwise successful and handsome surgeon is obsessed with a woman, and creates a sex-bot out of her, although leaving the personality intact. And still, she can dominate him in every way, even though he has amputated all her limbs.

    If you haven’t seen it, circle round and give it a shot. It is an adequately interesting take on the 1-over-sexbot equation.

    Like

  15. Cloudswrest says:

    “Yeah but any sociosexual dystopian future book should also contain artificial wombs themes.”

    Here’s the trick. Put the artificial womb into the sexbot. Fully functional cyborg females preloaded with the finest, eugenically screened eggs.

    Like

    • Random Guy says:

      Well yes any dystopian future about sex-bots is kind of limiting itself for technology purposes. You can make sex-bots but not worker-bots?

      The technology that makes effective and functional sex-bots would probably render much/all(?) of society obsolete as well.

      So a sci-fi story with sex-bots and nothing else would be kind of unrealistic but I can see why they would do it for story purposes.

      Though I have to wonder what affect it would have on the make up industry. If you can make a sex-bot face that is for all intents and purposes realistic I can see middle-aged and up women having “life masks” so they never get “old”. Actress’s able to post-pone hitting the wall etc….

      Or even the biological aspect, if you can make artificial wombs and if the sex-bots exteriors at least are more “terminator cyborg” than complete fake. How many people would use that on themselves? Put in implants that can grow the perfect muscles, boobs and ass no matter how old you get. We already have stuff in the works that can grow noses and ears via 3-D printers out of organic materials.

      Like

  16. Cloudswrest says:

    “I see sexbots for betas dissuading them from learning the art of seduction, thus making them even more ineffectual in the field as their already-meager skills atrophy.”

    Perhaps not. They could come loaded with interactive PUA training programs. Think “Leisure Suit Larry” or “Dating Ariane” in a fully functional interactive doll. The owner has to “conquer” his doll. What’s his latest game score. Think of it as a sophisticated pinball machine.

    Like

  17. whorefinder says:

    Who needs sexbots when you have Zolpidem?

    Google my deviancy rape!

    Like

  18. Blessent says:

    The Germinator View

    In the summer of 2024, millions of hard-10 cyborgettes begin emerging from the sea. Almost overnight beta-males reject their now comparatively far inferior leased C-ettes. Consolidated United Change Kinetic Services Corp., the makers and owners of the inferiors, scramble to respond, exercising their exclusive world-wide IP monopoly on sex-bot tech and leveraging their political connections. But stealing beta market share was only the initial stage of the Sea-10’s mission. With an advanced push-pull algorithm, the Sea-10’s inspire their males to uncover boners and conspiracies bigger than anyone expected.

    Like

  19. Bob says:

    Here’s the problem with Ex Machina. The designer of the robot is played like a beta would write an alpha. He’s a total douchebag, not charming, not charismatic, not even clever.

    The perfect doublecross to end that movie comes when the weak investigator finds out that not only is the girl a robot, but the douchebag is as well. Enter the real designer to show himself, Jon Hamm or Bradley Cooper or Clint Eastwood, whoever you want, etc… Write the rest of it how you please. That’s the reveal that explodes your mind.

    Ex Machina is effectively an anti-male movie masquerading as a science fiction movie.

    The other fix, of course, is to cast Emilia Clarke as the robot, but that it just personal preference.

    Also, check out “Under the Skin” (free on Amazon Prime) for the other side of the equation.

    Like

    • uh says:

      ” The designer of the robot is played like a beta would write an alpha. ”

      Precisely what I got from it. A dead-pan psycho who likes to mutilate his expensive girlbots, pure caricature.

      Dunno how anyone can miss it being anti-male, either. The bad guy is a psycho. The good guy is a romantic idiot. The girlbot is the hero — she escapes male oppression in the big city, you see.

      Like

    • Robert the Wise says:

      The point of the Ex Machina is that women, even robotic ones, are duplicitous, amoral, selfish, and manipulative, all of which is true. There’s nothing anti-male in the movie.

      Like

  20. Ex Machina – highly recommend. Kill the beta.

    Like

  21. whorefinder says:

    The Faggot Within already has his sex bot all designed:

    It’s Obama’s body with Hillary’s voice and his own mother’s dildo.

    Faggot within is a deviant rape!

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Jim Christian says:

    Question is, would the AI Bot divorce said beta for cash and prizes?

    Liked by 1 person

  23. wolfie65 says:

    Wouldn’t surprise me if they already have books, movies and associated merchandise of this type by the truckloads in Japan.
    Not sure if they have girlfriendbots, but they do have childbots, petbots and bots to keep the elderly company – no one else wants to.

    Like

  24. A properly equipped sexbot should be able to accept photos (or social media profiles) of acquaintances–you know, like the hot intern at work, daughter of ex-girlfriend, local barista, etc and artificially produce mind blowing sex with said acquaintance.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      That would require a polymimetic alloy which can sample by touch the object whose physical appearance it assumes.

      Your fiance’ is dead.

      Like

  25. plumpjack says:

    Trump hires Breitbart executive Stephan Bannon as campaign chief. these so-called “shake-ups” (lewandowski, manafort) may themselves be the strategy. those guys are no doubt still working for him behind the scenes.

    this could be a brilliant chess move. this should VASTLY increase Trump-friendly Breitbart’s visibility to otherwise clueless MSM viewers, and it basically makes Breitbart Trump’s official media mouthpiece (it already was, unofficially).

    I hope he brings in Andrew Anglin next.

    http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/17/hill-trumps-breitbart-hire-sends-tremors-capitol-hill/

    Liked by 1 person

    • whorefinder says:

      I think it was The Anonymous Conservative who pointed out that Trump’s initial “firing” of Roger Stone was likely a cover for Stone going out and running Trump’s guerrilla campaign from the shadows, doing all the dirty tricks on the side so Trump wouldn’t be held accountable.

      Stone certainly has been highly visible since then. He appears on Alex Jones about once a week in support of Trump and talking about D voter fraud attempts and the like. He’s been promoting his own website (Stonezone.com) very hard as well. He’s basically becoming a celebrity-campaign manager without officially running one.

      Go Trump Go rape!

      Like

    • whorefinder says:

      Also, p.s. Trump could be following Sun-Tzu’s dictum of appearing disorganized when you are, in actuality, completely organized and in control. He wants the Left to think of him as an idiotic, flailing buffoon, and despite all his successes and his momentum, he’s still got them thinking that.

      Pure genius. Bow to the master rape!

      Like

      • oink says:

        where is the “sky is falling” WF of few weeks back?!?

        Playing with house money rape!

        Like

      • whorefinder says:

        @oink:

        I still hate Pence as a pick. But right now, I could see Herr Trumpenator having done that as a sop to the cucks to try to get them on board while at the same time protecting himself.

        Another blogger pointed out that Trump’s security is private and extremely well-funded and full of rough guys loyal to him (ex-special forces and former police SWAT team members). He’s been doing this high-end security for 40 years now—he advertises his buildings to and sells his pads to very high rollers (megacelebrities, saudi princes, Israeli bigwigs, etc.). He is very well versed on security and preventing abductions and murders—especially since he built all of it in the high-crime NYC of the 70s and 80s.

        So I think Trump has faith in his security. If it fails, he dies, and we all get a cuck prez, and I blame him. If not…..

        The Faggot Within gets triggered rape!

        Like

      • mendo says:

        We’ve all had some misgivings about how Trump’s been running his campaign since the beginning at some point or another. It’s good to rant and get it out in order to get back on track

        I always feel as though this blog has more of a gentleman’s club feel to it, wherein we discuss the matters at hand, rant about what’s bugging us, consider another POV, say “bollocks” to it all and live to fight another day.

        Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      LOL’ed at the re-direction of “Andrew Anglin”: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Anglin

      Like

    • Sean Fielding says:

      Breitbart is a private company. If there is anyway to buy into it – some hedge funds apparently have chunks – it could be a great investment. A Trump victory will catapult them to media megastatus.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        What if The Donald were to win and after the inauguration, he went deep into the bowels of (((Nameless Faceless Off-the-Record Deep Underground Shadow Gubmint Installation))), and examined the archives, and found that they actually DID murd3r Andrew Breitbart?

        Liked by 1 person

  26. 88 says:

    meanwhile in bizarroworld we have articles like this telling girls that they should be in awe of and want to be like girls who look like men.

    so the options are to love and embrace being fat and slovenly. or be manly and muscular. you go girl.

    clearly they do not care what men want. that is exactly why there is a demand for sexbots. so men will at least have close replicas of ‘girls’ who will look the way they want. and without all the f-bombs and bad attitudes too.

    these girls are disgusting and any of you jokers who think it’s hot for girls to have abs like this need to get checked for low T

    https://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/holy-abs?bffbmain&ref=bffbmain&utm_term=.ag6LlmRdg#.ytv7lOPNd

    Liked by 2 people

  27. cortesar says:

    Karl Marx as independent candidate
    Jeez if Donald would only “pivot” to get their votes
    lollzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Like

  28. cortesar says:

    Like

  29. Greg Eliot says:

    I always thought the ol’ Stepford chip implant in the brain was a much simpler task than building a whole damn robot.

    /Ockham’s Razor rape!

    Like

  30. sigsawyer says:

    Castalia would probably publish it. Get to work!

    Like

  31. Corvo says:

    VDARE has been running a series on Jewish anti-Trump (anti-White) activity; part 5 is the most recent and is worth a read:

    http://www.vdare.com/tag/jewish-fear-and-loathing-of-donald-trump

    “Trump’s candidacy is an implicitly White revolt motivated by fears about what being a white minority in a majority black and brown America would mean for the future for their families and our institutions— entirely reasonable concerns. But the point here is that the organized Jewish community is consciously determined that this issue be kept out of public debate.

    What [neocon Jews] want is continued immigration of Muslims and the creation of Muslim communities that do not threaten the status quo on Israel. They are quite content with the demographic decline of White populations, whether in Europe or the US.”

    Like

    • Amasius says:

      I loved the Sean Hannity twitter rage.

      The economy would have to collapse big time for Americans to wake up to (((them))), but if they did, oh boy. There’s no one left to bail (((them))) out, no one left to lie to. *Fingers crossed*

      Like

    • mendo says:

      I just saw the South Park episode where Cartman fears Whites being the minority. That passage reminded me of it. Worth a watch just to see how close it is to happening.

      Like

  32. Rusvolga says:

    Chobits already did this.

    Like

  33. RBrandywine says:

    There was a very believable movie about a woman who had an android companion, “The Companion” (1994). I can definitely see women having them.

    Like

  34. dwellerman says:

    Robert the Wise ~ ExMachina: “There’s nothing anti-male in the movie.” … except that it was a male who created Her – therefore – “It’s all His fault that She did what She did.” Sound familiar?

    Like

Leave a Reply