Feed on
Posts
Comments

Confirming what I’ve long suspected, commenter BostonTea at Steve Sailer’s blog cites a paper concluding that the google violent crime rate is higher — in fact much higher — than the already disproportionately high rate shown in official FBI crime stats, because hispanics are almost entirely classified as “White” in federal statistics.

Steve, did you read this paper – Steffensmeier et al, “Reassessing Trends in Black Violent Crime, 1980-2008″?

We know that black males and females whose race was identified are responsible for over 50% of nation’s homicides. But there’s a huge problem with official assessments and conclusions about trends in violence based on national statistics published annually in the FBI’s UCR.

In federal statistics an overwhelming majority of the U.S. Hispanic population is classified as White (93%), whereas 4% of Hispanics are considered Black. Also crime-reporting programs typically record Hispanic arrests as White arrestees, failing to separate ethnicity from race – in particular, failing to separate Hispanics from non-Hispanic Whites. This does not only limit understanding of ethnic involvement but also hides the true disparity between White-Black crime rates (when ethnicity is NOT considered the disparity between the two races is less extreme) and tends to inflate White rates and deflate Black rates. It is called the “Hispanic effect”.

After creating estimates of “clean” White and “clean” Black arrest counts that do not include Hispanics, Steffensmeier et al. discovered that the Black share of violent crime was enlarged from 51% to 64% for homicide category and from 59% to 70% for robbery. As far as ratios are concerned, the average Black–White ratio for homicide was 7:1 using official FBI’s figures and jumped to almost 12:1 after adjusting (after separating Hispanics from non-Hispanic Whites). Same for robbery: ratio jumped from 10:1 to 15:1.

64%!

In essence, classifying Hispanic arrestees with Whites (or Blacks) deflates the Black fraction of arrests and deflates the Black–White arrest rate ratio, particularly for the more reliably reported offenses of homicide and robbery.

And likewise classifying hispanic arrestees as White (or google) deflates the hispanic crime rate. Someone should inform Ron Unz of this paper.

There’s a good reason why shitlibs cling to the cognitive emollient of rank hypocrisy. As urban dwellers they know the truth about google propensity to violence, and would prefer the expediency of hypocrisy (i.e., the disconnect between their stated beliefs and their real world actions) to the torturous ordeal of exposing their hysterically fragile egos to honest self-reflection that could potentially give succor — and a mischievous Pepe-ian smirk — to their eternal enemies, the deplorable BadWhites/Goyim.

41 Responses to “The Google-White Homicide Ratio Is Even Worse Than Official Statistics Show”

  1. PA says:

    We will have achieved 14W when our countries have White, and only White, criminal classes.

    Like

  2. Nads says:

    I see what you did there.

    You go Google.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. GREG NIKOLIC says:

    (Sep 26) Toronto — DTAH Architects, of 50 Park Road, Rosedale, offered today to give Trump “the snazziest wall he will ever behold” complete with “[bloody] sacrifices of Toronto virgins” even before Donald J. Trump’s projected crushing victory over a sickly-looking and hysterically strident Hillary Clinton in the presidential debate in New York Monday night, Trump’s home ground.

    “At first we were skeptical,” DTAH’s lead project manager told Sorcerygod, “not only of Trump himself, but of his apparently racist policies. They seemed beyond the pale. But once we saw which way the American-Superpower-wind was blowing, we grinned in a friendly way and jumped smartly on the Trump White House bandwagon.”

    [to continue reading, click on GREG to go to my site]

    Like

  4. I’m listening to Les Mis music. Smoking a cigar, and waiting for the debolition to start. Here boys, enjoy…

    Liked by 1 person

  5. whorefinder says:

    I’m going to attempt to find a gathering of shitlords to watch Herr Trumpenreich begin its next stage tonight at Hofstra.

    Barring that, watching it with a gathering of Young Republicans will do. Have to try to convert some of those vegetarians into full-fledged red meat eaters.

    Barring that, I’ll go throw eggs at a Young Democrats debate-watch meetup. Or maybe watermelons, tampons, and (((yarmulkes))).

    Barring that, in my room, a bottle of whiskey in one hand, my throbbing erect penis in the other.

    A great night anyway you slice it rape!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. whorefinder says:

    In all seriousness, I was so giddy at the debates tonight that I could not do a lick of work all day.

    It’s Christmas in September rape!

    Like

  7. greginaurora says:

    The most important study I’ve ever read, referenced by CH (which makes him the most honest source of scientific study I’ve ever discovered), was the one linked in “Dangerous ¡SCIENCE!: Clues That Empathic Ability Varies By Race” (I’d post the link, but you know how this works).

    Googles don’t think of others. Shitlibs do think of others, and can’t even imagine a world in which race is a real thing and racial differences exist. Therefore, by their own emotional thinking, it’s impossible that googles are different from shitlibs. They’re violent because they’re mad, and they’re mad because they’re treated unfairly. So, if they can just be super extra NICE to them, they’ll stop being mad.

    In their minds, it’s impossible that they’re not actually mad at all. The googles aren’t violent because they’re mad. The googles are violent because they don’t possess genetic empathy towards their fellow humans and believe that they’ll literally have to fight for everything that they want in life. To the googles, shitlib nicery is fake, tricky, and weak.

    That “basic humanity” that we’re all taught about when we’re young? They don’t have it.

    Liked by 2 people

    • tms71 says:

      You exaggerate but the point is valid. That’s the essence of leftism. Not liberalism that’s different. They can’t understand that people are different. If they aren’t behaving the same they must be reacting to mistreatment or a bad environment and we’ll fix that. It’s a really optimistic view but it’s a fantasy with terrible consequences.

      Like

      • uiouiouio u says:

        The ideological mainspring of leftism is interesting: everybody is already equal, while, at the same time, all shall do all in their power to make everybody equal.

        Like

    • I recall reading a study once that showed googles tend to have a more favorable impression of racist white people than of less racist white people. When you consider that the latter category is mostly made up of pathetic weeping vaginas who try desperately to kiss their ass every second of the day, it makes perfect sense. Leftists are fucking creepy.

      Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      Barely human. Compassion is a higher order emotion and requires a minimal IQ for it. 7o or 75 is not enough

      Like

  8. Speaking of googles having the highest crime rates of all races.

    you may have heard of a shooting in Florida many months ago. A drug deal “gone bad” . The perpretators; two black brothers one 15 the other 17 . The video of the murderers leaving the scene was everywhere.

    Well listen to this,

    a white woman named Roxanne Dubé is “…a former Fulbright Scholar in Canada, one of the most prestigious awards around the world. Through 2014, 53 Fulbright scholars had gone on to win Nobel Prizes…”

    “…Dube, an experienced diplomat, was appointed the Canadian Consul General in Miami in November…”

    so what is the connection between the black criminals and that woman with a prestigious award?

    they are her two sons!!!

    yep.

    she fell in love with a google and they had two google sons who became criminals as most of them do.

    The fact their white mother was a Fulbright scholar with loads of money, education, manners, and good genes ( she even has blue eyes) did not change the fact her sons had google genes in them and google genes tend to make them criminals.

    Google will be googles. no matter what.

    sad that white women are destroying their lives for black cock….really sad.

    http://heavy.com/news/2015/04/roxane-dube-sons-ex-husband-background-experience/

    Liked by 1 person

    • Captain Obvious says:

      sad that white women are destroying their lives for black Google cock

      Liked by 1 person

    • Alfa158 says:

      Looked at her photo in the linked article. She has those crazy eyes you see in smart, educated women who nevertheless do the stupidest things imaginable. I learned when I was young, never sleep with anyone crazier than you. Crazy women put out the wildest sex, but it isn’t worth the risk in return.

      Liked by 1 person

  9. racerxx says:

    Ann Coulter points this out frequently in “Adios America”. It’s the dirty little secret of how they can bury the “migrant” crime stats.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. wolfie65 says:

    The term ‘Hispanic’ only means that person was raised in an environment more or less based on Iberian culture, it has nothing to do with ethnicity.
    I remember watching a Miss Universe contest about a decade or so ago, in which Miss Venezuela was the most gorgeous Scandinavian-looking blue-eyed Blonde anyone has ever seen.
    Hearing her answer questions in halting, heavily Spanish-accented English was extremely odd, most Scandinavians speak excellent English.
    Turns out that both her parents emigrated there from Sweden.
    Bet she has about a million or so would-be boyfriends lined up back in Caracas, no one there has ever seen a woman like her…..
    The Blonde Goddess of the jungle.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Random Guy says:

    Another thing to consider is; aside from “Personal Identification” or racial “characterization” for studies and polls.

    What race we would view a hispanic made be pretty different from how they view themselves or mark on the government sheet of paper. Met some “white” hispanics that weren’t so white to me.

    Going to be some non-black identifying hispanics that are actually pretty black…..the ol’ “I’m not Black, I’m Puerto Rican!” deal.

    So “4%” of hispanics being black might be a low end estimate.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hispanics are a lot more open about their racial hierarchies than we are. In the olden days, if a native or mestizo in the Spanish colonies did something particularly noteworthy, the King of Spain could reward him with a “certificate of whiteness” proclaiming that his status was to be elevated to that of a white person.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply