Feed on
Posts
Comments

This is the place to leave your opinions of tonight’s epic debate between the God Emperor and thecunt.

If circumstances allow, I will step in to live-shiv the proceedings.

***

I can’t do this. thecunt’s voice……IT HURTS SO BAD. Listening to her is like a million termites burrowing into my ear canal. MUTE BUTTON MUTE MUTE MUTE

***

Forget about race realism in 2016 America. If demographic trends continue and the US becomes a one party state (the Gibs Party), forget about it forever. That said, it makes sense for Trump to call out thecunt on her superpredator remark. Defensive crouch, etc.

***

I don’t think thecunt has ever had a debate in which she was pushed to the wall this hard. And tbh I think Trump is missing half the shots he could take.

***

thecunt used the word “vibrancy” to describe the black church. What a phoneyfuck. Reminder: this happened a couple days ago in Charlotte:

***

As per usual the debate moderator, Lester Dolt, is either a paid thecunt shill, or emotionally invested in protecting thecunt from tough questions. Can we get Jared Taylor to moderate one of these debates?

***

Even God Emperors get colds. Trump did well enough, but his Game wasn’t as tight as it could have been. thecunt is such a ripe target, no shots should be missed. I’ll chalk it up to him being under the weather.

***

Not a single word about immigration, the most pressing issue of the day. And what about the corrupt-to-the-core Clinton Foundation? Combetta asking Reddit for advice about how to strip VIP email addies from thecunt’s emails? Trump has to tell these debate administrators to fuck off unless he gets to exercise some choice in the moderator, like lawyers do when wrangling over jury selection.

***

If I could give Trump advice for the next debate (maybe I am!) it would be, “Don’t get caught flat-footed defending yourself. OFFENSE OFFENSE OFFENSE. Own the frame. Go after the cunt like you’re filleting a fishwife.”

***

thecunt in two words: humorless scold.

***

“fact checkers” are all shitlibs. There’s now a cottage industry fact-checking the “fact checkers”. thecunt makes appeals to them because she knows they’ll carry her water.

***

Trump had lots of inside-the-overton window killshots he neglected to make. I’m not talking about pushing the realtalk envelope. I mean perfectly normie shivs that he missed. For instance, “My tax returns weren’t responsible for the deaths of four Americans in Libya.” BOOM. This is no time to allow thecunt some flappy wizard sleeve labia room. Corner her like a pig, and stick her in the vitals!

***

FOR FUCK’S SAKE, TRUMP, HIT THECUNT ON HER WALL ST CONNECTIONS! This is easy: “Tax cuts for the rich?! How about you taking millions in speaking fees from slimy fat cat banksters like Goldman Sachs to ensure the flood of cheap labor across the border continues? How is that helping working Americans?”

***

Iraw War: In 2002, Trump was a businessman. thecunt was a Senator. It was HER JOB, not Trump’s, to figure out the truth about Iraq’s involvement with 9/11 and determine if war was justified.

663 Responses to “The Trumpening Vs thecunt: Debate Open Thread”

  1. whorefinder says:

    The next stage of Herr Trumpenreich begins.

    And the wailing and gnashing of teeth came from the Left side of the aisle.

    President Trump rape!

    Liked by 1 person

    • mendo says:

      Holt is a cuck. He’s getting schlonged cause he’s terribly lame.

      Like

    • mendo says:

      And tbh I think Trump is missing half the shots he could take.

      Missed the immigration issue with the homegrown terrorists entry point.

      Like

    • jjrockmale says:

      Are you saying that now? I cannot believe your “God King” self-imploded like that. I could not believe he did not take any of the layups she provided. How can he be that inept? I read the comments here, and I am left wondering if all of you and I are watching the same friggin debate?

      Like

      • whorefinder says:

        *smirk*

        Scott Adams: Trump had one goal: look less like some scary beast as depicted by the Left and more like a president.

        Trump: Mission accomplished.

        Hillary’s goals: erase 30 years of people not trusting her in one night and erase the last 8 years she’s running on.

        Hillary: Mission failure.

        Playing 4-D chess rape!

        Like

      • jjrockmale says:

        The scary thing whorefinder, is if you’re right. He should not have let the media play him, and just gone for the jugular. I don’t think he was planning anything. I think he the fact that he looked out of his league is because he was. I don’t think it was an act.

        Like

      • whorefinder says:

        Now now, little Hillary stooge, your vain attempts to sow doubt are only exposing you more.

        He’s leading in the early morning polls. Nothing this man does is by accident.

        Your Lizard Queen is going down rape!

        Like

      • vfm#7634 says:

        According to two different polls, undecideds say that thecunt won narrowly but they’re more likely to vote for Trump.

        Comfort game rape!

        Like

      • GCM says:

        “Scott Adams: Trump had one goal: look less like some scary beast as depicted by the Left and more like a president.

        Trump: Mission accomplished.”

        He was cucked. He didn’t go for the jugular. He came across just like Hillary, a fascist.

        You’re an idiot rape.

        “Hillary’s goals: erase 30 years of people not trusting her in one night and erase the last 8 years she’s running on.

        Hillary: Mission failure.”

        Wow, you got one right…finally.

        Every dog has its day rape.

        Both candidates are idiots. But especially more egregious are the Jews on this blog who buy Trump hook, line, and sinker.

        Like

      • jjrockmale says:

        LOL. HRC supporter am I? You’re like a feminist. No sooner does someone disagree with you, you go to a script. I don’t argue with women. And I don’t let transgenders suck me off. So you’re out of luck.

        Liked by 1 person

      • vfm#7634 says:

        LOL. HRC supporter am I? You’re like a feminist.

        No, bonehead, we surmise you’re an HRC supporter because of your previous statements. It isn’t that difficult to figure out.

        Like

    • Nads says:

      JJ- now if Hillary can only get at least a week to prepare for every event that takes place….

      Like

  2. whorefinder says:

    P.S. If anyone from the audience shouts out “Pepe!” at the debate tonight, I will fucking lose it and pass out from laughter.

    Pepe for VP rape!

    Liked by 2 people

    • I’m hoping The Donald is wearing an EM-radiating device, which will saturate all known frequencies for earbud devices with a scratching hissing squalling cacophony, which proceeds right straight into illary’s eardrum, and that she throws a transient ischemic attack or a petit mal seizure as a result.

      Liked by 2 people

    • mendo says:

      Someone shouts “Pepe” and Trump gives a knowing shit-eating grin to acknowledge.

      Thus, the universe shall collapse upon itself and we will all be the better for it.

      Liked by 3 people

    • PA says:

      Pepe for VP rape!

      Well…

      PENCE
      PE [NC] E

      (NC is the 33rd state alphabetically)
      (N is the 14th letter, C is the 3rd letter; 14+3=17)
      33-17=16
      P is the 16th letter

      PE [NC=P] E

      PEPE

      Like

      • Kyo says:

        Pepe is the standard nickname for Jose.

        Jose is the Spanish equivalent of Joseph, or Joe.

        We are all Average Joes.

        ∴ We Are All Pepe.

        Quod erat demonstrandum.

        Like

  3. tanabear says:

    These people are certainly supporting Trump:

    Only Donald Trump can save humanity!!! Hilarious.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. mendo says:

    GLORIOUS!

    Like

  5. Some Guy says:

    Unfortunately, I have class tonight, so I won’t be able to see the God-king in action, at least live. To atone, I will try to game cute little Persian girl whose lab station is right across the aisle from mine. Any suggestions for an opener?

    Like

    • opener: islam’s toast. wanna fuk?

      Liked by 2 people

    • uh says:

      So how bout that crazy ayatollah amirite?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Fearless says:

      Shit eating grin. Sigh and say it’s a shame you’ll have to go back to goat herding come January, but if you work hard I’ll see what I can do for you.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Just ask her something about the class. Joke about the professor. You don’t need a clever “opener” in this situation.

      Like

    • mendo says:

      “I like peanut butter. Wanna f–k?”

      Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Not sure what to do if she’s (((Persian))) [i.e. Mizrahim]. But if she’s actually actual Persian [i.e. Shiite], then you can work the conversation around to her thoughts on Sunni Islam – see if you can get her to say e.g. that the Sunni are subhumans, or s@tanists, or similar. Also you need to talk about any Koranic or Haddithic proscriptions against alcohol consumption, cause you are definitely gonna wanna slip a few glasses of chardonnay in her.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        You: “So is it true what they say about the Sunni?” She: “blah blah blah” You: “Well, like that they prefer goats and little boys rather than the company of a beautiful woman?”

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        You: “So what does the Shia tradition have to say about Shiraz? In France they call it Syrah. It makes a wonderful wine. You know that the Shiraz grape came from Persia, right?”

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Nah, make it more direct. “You know, the French and the Australians make a beautiful wine from a Persian grape called Shiraz. In France, they call it Syrah. Men and women drink it together as they are falling in l0ve…”

        Like

      • ho says:

        You are the strangest, most derangest motherfucker on this site and that’s saying something.

        I mean, actual autism.

        Why would they say that? Sunni and Shia are not noticably different. It’s just that the House of Saud is shit.

        Like

      • Sean Fielding says:

        @ho: All religions become ethnically specific over time: they become the unexpressed psychological foundations of specific groups. So Shia and Sunni are as different from each other as Persians (actual, modern Persians, not Persians LARPing as Aryans from 4,000 year ago) are from Arabs. Which is to say, significantly different, but not so different as either is from us Western Whites, with our strangely evolving post-Christian secularism.

        Like

  6. uh says:

    Go to bar I like to watch debate.

    Two tv’s. Absent-minded bartender. Skater kid, fat guy, crusty construction guy playing pinball.

    I’m informed we can’t put the debate on either tv because pinball guy has money on the niggerball game on.

    Felt like saying well guy ya might have more money to blow on your stupid ball if you cared about the nonwhites pouring in, but hey, WHITE PEOPLE.

    Like

  7. Here’s the thing about the debates. Everybody is super excited about this debate. Crazy – go – nuts. And we also know that Clinton fans are not excited. Not at all. She can’t get any crowds, and they are pretty tepid.

    I am very biased, but even accounting for that bias it still seems to me that we are heading straight on in to a Trumpslide.

    We shall see.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. Laguna Beach Fogey says:

    There’s a buzz going around the office today about the debate.

    Goys are leaving early to watch it.

    I’m getting tingles all over, fam.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Ang Aamer says:

    I have only listened to a few pundits. But to me everyone is dialing down expectations for Hillary being a match for El Trump.

    I mean a few have even gone so far to say that the night is Trump’s to lose

    Like

  10. For what it is worth,

    here in Quebec, on tv news two experts, some female University professor and some other guy I don’t know, both anti-Trump leftists, after they bashed Trump they both admitted they think he will win the election anyway.

    Like

  11. I’ll renounce my atheism if Illary croaks on stage.

    Like

  12. driveallnight says:

    Based on his call of the ’86 World Series, here’s Vin Scully on this presidential election:

    “Ground ball to the right side….and it goes through Clinton! It goes through Clinton! And here comes Pepe around to score…and the orange-haired maniac is gonna win it!”

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Illary’s debate prep book…

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Popcorn Out says:

    My handle seems particularly apt tonight.

    I’m tuning in from the UK. I’m getting a strange sense of deja vu from a few months ago when I worked a 14 hour day and stayed up until 8am to hear that we had prevailed and Brexit was really happening.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. uh says:

    SHOOTING RAMPAGE IN HOUSTON

    “NAZI PARAPHERNALIA AMONG HIS BELONGINGS”

    BAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

    Like

  16. plumpjack says:

    one of Trump’s mantras is “if you’re going to be thinking anyway, think BIG”. he’ll be going into tonight’s debate with the goal of “how can I crush this bitch, win the election, and expose the entire globalist mafia cabal in the next 90 minutes?”

    Hillary and her short-sighted band of nitwits will be thinking “how can we appear not to lose this debate?” period. they are THAT ill-prepared for this insurrection. they thought they had it in the bag. jeb or hillary. heads I win tails you lose. they have no plan b. or even a plan A.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. FH says:

    What grave did they dig that thing out of????

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Blessent says:

    Melania looks great. Followed by knock out Ivanka and the rest of the excellent Trump family.

    Vs. only sickly looking old Bill.

    It’s over.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Libertardian says:

      Fifteen minutes max until corrupt MSM starts posting their “Hillary Won the Debate. Here’s Why.” articles with the Mad Libs style blanks filled in by bots.

      “But Mr. Cuckstein, she keeled over five minutes in.”

      “SHUT UP! We’ll find some way to spin it, goddamn it.” (opens desk drawer to chug from bottle of Grey Goose, is briefly tempted by loaded .38 instead)

      Liked by 1 person

    • Rum says:

      After this discussion is over, check out my lengthy comment about this under “Skittles behaving badly.” I live in that neighborhood and know some things…

      Like

  19. uh says:

    Aight, so we got a “Nathan DeSai” injured 9 with a “tommy gun”. Reports of a “Nazi symbol” and “Civil War memorabilia”.

    a) Literally 30 minutes before debate.
    b) DeSai sounds a lot like the common Hindu surname “Desai”, i.e. nobody at all
    c) Only injuries — if you were putting up a false flag, you wouldn’t necessarily kill anyone

    So yea …

    Like

  20. GB says:

    had to search skypetube to find the stream. the other debates were promoted. Funny

    Like

  21. Hugh Jenniks says:

    praise be to Kek…may thecunt cough up a giant phlegm shmutz ball that hits (((Cuban))) in his meeskite punim.

    Like

  22. Scanman says:

    Just so you goyim know… No one “wins” these debates.

    I know this because I’m highly educated.

    Liked by 2 people

  23. Blessent says:

    Her mouth sounds dry….

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Captain Obvious says:

    Scott Adams & the mystery meat chick with the D-Cups are supposed to be available here, although I think it must require some special software: https://www.periscope.tv/ScottAdamsSays/

    Like

  25. Wrong Side of History says:

    It’s impossible for Trump to lose a debate to Hillary.

    She has far too much baggage and the Donald is a ZFG savage like me.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Only at the first question, already Trump’s answer is 5 times better than Hillary’s.

    Woah…she gave an empty answer, Trump used facts. Concerning facts.

    She is weak.

    Like

  27. mendo says:

    He asked, to make sure, if it was okay to call her “Secretary”…he wants her to be happy.

    Like

  28. Popcorn Out says:

    When she smilles it sends the same chills down my spine as Heath Ledger’s Joker.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. Eric says:

    Hey very interesting question is you live in your reality an argument a girl would make against a male, just pointing it out jpio

    Like

  30. PA says:

    Good of Trump interrupting her. This will knock her off-track.

    Like

  31. -A says:

    Just look at the cunt snickering now. Wait until they have to flesh out the raw fact of their platforms.

    Like

  32. plumpjack says:

    he’s owning this scripted 3-headed bitch

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Laguna Beach Fogey says:

    Trump is killing it.

    Liked by 1 person

  34. -A says:

    So, instead of keeping American money in America and bringing in more money, she wants to reform the definition of Middle Class, basically redistribute wealth into “””the middle class””” and send more kids to college instead of making real jobs hinged on capital goods and services? Too bad the people are too blueballed for Trump to just call that out on the cunt.

    Like

  35. “We are going to have a special prosecutor.” — TheCunt.

    Psychological slip of the year.

    Like

  36. -A says:

    Now instead of discussing Trump’s ideas about international trade, very harsh charges against our State Department, mysterymeatmoderator wants to nigger about tax returns that are none of his business.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. -A says:

    release the e-mails!

    PEPE!!

    Liked by 1 person

  38. Popcorn Out says:

    He needs to stop interrupting her. It gives the impression of anxiety as if his opponent might make a valid argument. He should save his rebuttals for his turn and sew them all together into a tapestry of smackdowns.

    Like

    • Publius says:

      Agree. Interrupting looks weak.

      Like

    • Interrupting successfully is done by a superior. Monkey brains take note of this.

      ‘Cutting people off

      You talk and talk. The King has a thought of his own. It could be a grand thought, or a trivial musing. It doesn’t matter, because it is the King’s thought, and that means the King will cut you off mid-sentence to regale the masses with his wit and wisdom. His voice commands, his self-confidence refuses impugning, his happy entitlement woos crowds. Even you, cast aside and set adrift, find strange succor in the King’s heady leadership.’

      -CH

      Liked by 1 person

  39. He calls her secretary Clinton , which is respectful and to an extent Presidential, and how a president would address her

    she calls him Donald which is a bit disrespectful, she probably wants him to look small but it is her who looks bad by calling him Donald, what is the word I am looking for ? contempt?

    Like

    • uh says:

      Belittlement is all they have bro. A man could be nine feet talk and women would try to cut him down with remarks about size. Because it’s pretty much their paramount criterion.

      Like

    • Publius says:

      Her calling him “Donald” is classic jew-feminist modernism overcompensating. Completely unprofessional.

      Like

  40. Publius says:

    crowd cheers Trump.

    moderator reminds them that they are not allowed to show that 90% there want Trump.

    unbelievable.

    Liked by 1 person

  41. Publius says:

    33,000 emails.

    check mate.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Publius says:

      crowd cheered mention of 33,000 emails. Hillary turns red.

      moderator scolds crowd. not allowed to show that everybody wants Trump and hates Hillary.

      Hunger Games is happening right now.

      Liked by 1 person

      • carlos danger says:

        The Hunger Games was written by a Christian conspiracy theorist who saw what was going to happen. I first heard of the Illuminati from a college roommate who worked in the music industry and was J-wish. I liked him a lot actually and would love to meet him again. He was sounding the alarm back in 1982 and everyone laughed. They’re not laughing anymore.

        Like

  42. Laguna Beach Fogey says:

    She looks ill.

    Like

  43. he hit her with the 30,000 emails the crowd cheered

    Like

  44. -A says:

    Really? She takes responsibility for the e-mails? Then why isn’t she in jail?

    Liked by 1 person

  45. Publius says:

    Hillary: the entire country hates you.

    Fuck.

    You.

    Liked by 1 person

  46. -A says:

    Who cares if Trump isn’t charitable? The only reason the cunt shows her tax returns is because the dipshits who live off of speech fees and running hedge fund charities all push money around for a living.

    Like

  47. Laguna Beach Fogey says:

    She’s trying so hard not to cough.

    Like

  48. -A says:

    If your main claim to being President of the United States is how you refused to take being Secretary of State seriously, Trump should win by default.

    Like

    • Dickery Dock says:

      Oh she took being Secretary of State very seriously. It was her cash cow!

      Pay to play! Give Willie Jeff $300,000 for 20 minutes of blather and we’ll talk!

      Like

  49. plumpjack says:

    she apologized for the email server. kiss of death.

    Like

  50. -A says:

    Listen to the cunt talk about a father who rolls in his grave whenever her name echoes.

    Like

  51. -A says:

    Oh yeah, let’s talk about race mysterymeatmoderator…

    Like

  52. -A says:

    Race also determines innate ability. Disingenuous cunt.

    Like

  53. -A says:

    Dicks out for gun grubbin’

    Like

  54. She’s lecturing during the ‘race’ segment…ice cold as usual.

    Like

  55. Publius says:

    There is not a “gun epidemic.”

    There is a google epidemic.

    We have to tackle the plague of google violence.

    Indeed.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Scanman says:

      Exactly. America does not have a gun problem, it has a black problem. Take away black gun violence, and the US (with 300 million guns) is safer than some euro countries.

      Liked by 1 person

  56. plumpjack says:

    she’s already ready for a nap. I hope he goes for the kill shot.

    Like

  57. PA says:

    “We have to bring communities together.” -HRC

    No, we don’t

    Liked by 1 person

    • Lovekraft says:

      By ‘communities’ I wonder if she is talking about the champagne elites and the section 8ers.

      Like

  58. Popcorn Out says:

    Race next.

    Softball question – look at inner cities which always vote Democrat and see how fooked up they are. Case closed.

    Like

  59. -A says:

    Notice how she frued-slipped gun availability and black people being bad…for black people.

    Good on Trump supporting Law and Order instead of slap-dick reform.

    Like

    • Publius says:

      (((libtard))) translator:

      hate = truth

      gun = dindu

      We need dindu control. There is a dindu violence epidemic.

      See how this works?

      Like

  60. -A says:

    Trump knows he can’t be frank about race and guns and he’s basically making the song and dance of “idiot, it’s axiomatic….” I wish he would have just said that White people were over represented in stop and frisk and went in prepared to cite the study.

    Like

  61. Publius says:

    Even Trump can’t say “80 IQ gonna 80 IQ,” which is the real truth, the solution to which cannot be discussed.

    Like

    • Publius says:

      This is any location on earth dominated by Africans:

      Period.

      Liked by 1 person

    • uh says:

      Oh be fair.

      80 is Burkina Faso. Ours are at like 90. 👍

      Like

      • carlos danger says:

        Burkina Faso is 70 to 75. American blacks are at the 80 to 85 range. Its worse than you say. I had a good chat about this with a South African in London a few months back. He was pleased to see I understood what was really going on in SA and that it was being done to the USA too. Very dialed in on the Rothschilds.

        Like

  62. Popcorn Out says:

    Anyone know what a “black business” is please? LOL

    Like

  63. -A says:

    Yes. Let’s address the systemic racism in our system which forces us Whites to tolerate brown criminals.

    We can’t reform mudbloods. They will bleed dirt until the end of time.

    Like

  64. Publius says:

    Yes we need common sense google control measures.

    Like

  65. Wrong Side of History says:

    Fucking yawn

    Like

  66. Wrong Side of History says:

    Hillary is such a boring cunt.

    Like

  67. -A says:

    Listen to her try to take a reasonable affect. It grates on my ears with her fake ass twinge of try hard hackneyed script reading.

    Like

  68. She just blamed white people for blacks and hispanics commiting crimes

    Liked by 1 person

  69. -A says:

    It is amazing he she sounds so much more stupid when Trump reframes from her weak premise. She sounded stupid enough already, now she seems like such a child.

    Like

  70. -A says:

    Anyone else notice that she is pulling the obama-flip? Repeat the opponent’s reasonable statement as your own and in the frame of your own premise while also trying to ride the momentum of it, like you even know what’s going on with the argument in the first place?

    Like

  71. Publius says:

    “You decided to stay home, and that’s okay.”

    lolzozozozoozoz

    Like

  72. -A says:

    Heeeere we go, birth certificate drama bomb.

    Like

    • Publius says:

      1. Obama was not born in the United States.
      2. Jews, not important now. No deplorable voter cares. Another (((desparation))) hail mary fake issue.

      Like

  73. Wrong Side of History says:

    Awful nigger moderator.

    Like

  74. -A says:

    Trump basically called out the sketchy nature of the certificate being produced. Rock hard game?

    Like

  75. Publius says:

    Racism is realism.

    “Racist”.

    That doesn’t work anymore, bitch.

    Like

    • Tuna says:

      “Racism is Realism” is a great line. Heading to cafe-press now to mint a new magnetic bumper sticker to put right next to the current ones: “TRUMP” and “Egalitarianism is the biggest lie ever sold”

      Like

    • Tuna says:

      sadly, “Rasiss!” is still a very easy way to win an argument with most people… it does work, because most liberals and cucks would rather be labeled a child molester.

      Like

  76. -A says:

    He didn’t put the birther lie to bed, he embraced it and bared it all for people to see. Racist lie my ass.

    Like

  77. Wrong Side of History says:

    This demoness really shouldn’t wear red

    Like

  78. Jerry says:

    Just so you know guys trump got eviscerated. Nothing against yall even though i know you guys like your bubble and flame everyone who disagrees with you, but gota call a spade a spade.

    Like

  79. -A says:

    There’s no dignity in the obama shit hut.

    Like

  80. Captain Obvious says:

    That bizarre hesitation from illary – every three or four words she pauses and just stops for a split second before blurting out another three or four words – that persistent hesitation is just screaming “(((Eskimo Producer))) leading her along via earbud.”

    Like

    • Tuna says:

      Yeah, it was a bit strange. She did seem like she was being led somehow. When it came to things she had well-rehearsed, she smoke normally… in situations where she had to respond to something she couldn’t have prepared for, it seemed like she was repeating words from her earpiece.

      Like

  81. Scanman says:

    “Racist birther lie”

    Ugh… the shitlibs are just shameless

    Like

  82. Wrong Side of History says:

    Your first language is yiddish https://t.co/mhYl4Lxujw

    — Paul Town (@PaulTown_) September 27, 2016

    Like

  83. -A says:

    He’s only human. He can’t be QuipKing for two straight hours. Nobody who wants to persuade 300million people can.

    Like

  84. This is nerve wrecking to watch. Just kick her ass!

    Like

  85. -A says:

    What does this bitch know about defenses against cyber attacks? She is the definition of a sitting duck. It’s been proven.

    As for Putin’s hack squad, sounds to me like what makes her eyes turn to dollar signs.

    Like

  86. -A says:

    The NSA were the ones who hacked Yandex first.

    Liked by 1 person

  87. She’s trying really hard not to sweat, but she’s still shiny. She can’t believe Trump hasn’t self destructed, and she’s not sure which buttons to press. She has reverted to her default bloodless schoolmarm mode.

    Like

  88. mendo says:

    Shillary so hates Russia. She really thinks he’s asking them to hack us.

    Like

    • Scanman says:

      The Cunt’s (((Handlers))) have an irrational hatred of Russians (and all white Christian people). That’s why they murdered 50 million of them last century.

      Like

    • uh says:

      It makes geopolitical sense to corner Russia. Largest country by area, majority white and not changing (yet), strong resource base, authoritarian male rule. It’s basically the new Afghanistan. Our huge churning military growth machine requires a bête noire until all are subservient to propping up our diminishing returns.

      [CH: russia is the new afghanistan? no it’s not.]

      Like

      • uh says:

        You miss my point. It’s the new target for neoconservative hawks. And really, Afghanistan was just in the way of that. And I thought you had the Jewish thing all figured out! 😂

        Like

      • on February 26, 2016 at 4:16pm, uh writes:

        “I’m trying not to get mixed up in the same old debate — I know you guys believe “Rousseau did it”, then Marx, then of course the Jews, and “Christianity” gave us everything. I don’t see it that way. Reality is much more complex than the ideological dominoes which the mind imposes on events to satisfy its urge for agency.

        Moreover, as far as “method”, or angle, I am actually a Marxist. Ooga booga, I know.”

        (“Freelance Comment of the Week: Priorities, White People!”)

        saruh bear, I think we’ve got (((things))) thought out well enough, sweetie.

        Ooga booga to you too, Ms. White Nations Must Die. How are YOUR dominoes holding up?

        Like

  89. -A says:

    Aww shit cunt. How many military officials endorse your fugly ass, traitor?

    Like

  90. Wrong Side of History says:

    Hillary has an expert in cyber warfare advising her, he’s a top poster on all the relevant subreddits #debatenight

    — Pax Dickinson ♔ (@paxdickinson) September 27, 2016

    Like

  91. -A says:

    She probably didn’t even know about their twitter bombs until Trump brought them up. Her plans to fight ISIS involve keeping them up and going for the next eight years.

    Like

  92. Carlos Danger says:

    He’s pulling his punches too much. He needs to knock her out.

    Like

  93. -A says:

    Is this bitch really blaming elbow rubbing from her previous administrations on the Republicans?

    Like

  94. Wrong Side of History says:

    Meh.

    Trump started off so strong.

    Like

  95. Just Saying says:

    Trump took control and kept it… Although I was hoping the Clinton would have a seizure – but I figured that was why they set it up the way they did. Although her eyes still don’t line up right – getting the Marty Feldman look…

    Like

  96. With Hilldog’s health issues, and the fake rally’s (green screen and all), the whole debate seems contrived, I’m thinking its been pretaped, maybe even months ago before Broom Hilda started her slide into hades. The whole split screen, the smarmy Googler Lester Holmeses, just an uneasy feeling, or maybe its her Mary Hart shrill voice

    Like

  97. Wrong Side of History says:

    Yeah nice birther question, faggot. I’m sure you have a similar question about the Clinton Foundation in Haiti.

    — Hateful Heretic 🐸 (@hateful_heretic) September 27, 2016

    Like

  98. Wrong Side of History says:

    Lester Holt really needs a helicopter ride.

    Like

  99. Publius says:

    Everybody was against the war in 2003, except the Jews.

    Women should not be able to vote.

    https://twitter.com/cyber_president

    Like

  100. -A says:

    Lol. “I have a better temperament than she does…”

    Like

  101. Dude says:

    She shouldn’t even be on the stage. She should be in jail. This is a farce.

    Like

  102. -A says:

    Did it weaken his disposition or make him look like he is firm by correcting their assertions that he was for the war?

    Like

  103. Wrong Side of History says:

    I shouldn’t be surprised by a moderator blatantly fighting for Hillary, but this is a disgrace.

    Like

  104. So Lester is asking Trump about tax returns and birtherism, but no questions for Hillary on the Clinton Foundation or her emails. I guess he learned his lesson from Matt Lauer.

    Liked by 1 person

  105. -A says:

    Nuclear weapons are the biggest threat that everyone lives under on a global scale, neck and neck with ISIS.

    Like

  106. George says:

    He’s rambling. Who the fuck gives a shit about Sean Hannity.

    Like

    • -A says:

      He always rambles a little when the clock ticks on, though. He makes more sense than the cunt and he isn’t as bad as he could be at this point.

      Like

    • plumpjack says:

      this is by design. she’s ten times weaker than him yet they structure it so there’s no space for biology. just words and all words are equal without the force of a personality behind them. cut, interrupt, change subject. repeat. futile.

      Like

  107. Wrong Side of History says:

    .@realDonaldTrump: “We have to knock the hell out of ISIS. And we have to do it fast.” #DebateNight

    — Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) September 27, 2016

    Smitten.

    Like

  108. Carlos Danger says:

    He won but not as well as I would have liked but he did what was needed. He came across as more presidential. He didn’t hammer her as he could have. He should have had her crying.

    Like

    • -A says:

      For citizens who are truly fed up with the system, yes. For system hopefuls and moderate libs, no.

      Like

    • plumpjack says:

      she backed down hard when first jumped on her. maybe he could’ve saved that for later. the clock kept going and he lost momentum. maybe next time he should sandbag a bit, then do a takeaway. hammer her after she thinks she has him.

      Like

  109. Straight says:

    He appears unprepared for this debate..he keeps talking about “deals” all the time , and that won`t be enough for the victory. Better luck next time I`m afraid..

    Like

  110. mendo says:

    They cheer for Trump and Holt says to be quiet.

    They clap and cheer for HIllary and Holt stays quiet.

    That damn google

    Liked by 1 person

  111. -A says:

    @ Heartiste

    Trump is missing his punches because there is no “un-PC way to be PC” where it is indeed necessary for a man in his position. He isn’t Alt Right, he’s likely some kind of independent. He doesn’t think like we do, just in a way parallel to how we think.

    [CH: i wasn’t thinking about that kind of realtalk. trump had lots of inside-overton window killshots he neglected to make. For instance, “my tax returns weren’t responsible for the deaths of four americans in libya.” BOOM]

    Like

    • Hugh Jenniks says:

      Exactly -killshots neglected! She brings up racism -you laugh and say she was endorsed by the KKK & Grand Wizard Robert Byrd was her mentor.
      She brings up your taxes – you bring up her foundation. She brings up distrust of you having nuclear codes – you laugh and say “yeah she’s sell them to the highest bidder” She brings up her poor old daddy – you say her father is spinning in his grave over how she turned out & Saul Alinsky was her idol. She brings up your treatment of women (served up on as silver platter) you bring up Rapin Bill and her enabling him.
      AND WHY THE HELL DIDN’T HE BRING UP IMMIGRATION / INVASION and HER WANTING TO INCREASE IS 550% !!! That’s the death blow.

      Like

  112. Scanman says:

    I honestly think Hillary looks more presidential.

    WGAF if Bibi is happy?

    Focus, DJT.

    Like

  113. TLM says:

    The next time I start getting the eye rolling in a sales presentation from customers I’m going to appeal to the fact checkers. Fact checkers!

    On a serious note, this is boring and Trump looks like shit. I expected much better. There were a 1,000 opportunities for him to shiv her to death and ended up babbling on about his business, and don’t get me started on his constant ‘I happen to agree with her’ non sense. I love the guy and he looked defensive the whole night. A missed opportunity to end this election tonight.

    Like

    • Scanman says:

      Smash her on the e-mails and the Clinton foundation and Benghazi and being a liar…

      Like

    • -A says:

      Be sure to laugh with the transparent intent of misdirection.

      Like

    • Plenty of campaign time and two more debates to come to whack her on the Foundation…stay tuned, it’s coming.

      Like

      • Sentient says:

        Yup. Trump won tonight by not going all in Trump. He lost no support and may gain moderates. He knows he will have the opportunity for fireworks as things get close. No nees to push her now that polls are close. And he hit over and over the battleground states MI OH and PA.

        Hillary did nothing at all. She delivered no blows and will sway no one. Her big gain was standing up.

        Love all the one name trolls showing up tonight with (((comments)))…

        Like

      • mendo says:

        Love all the one name trolls showing up tonight with (((comments)))…

        Yeah…seem like first-time commenters. How appropriate!

        [CH: half of them are the sperm collector within.]

        Like

      • hans says:

        Yeah, lets hope this was just the initial measured start to the 3 round fight.

        Even if the round one K.O. everybody hoped for didn´t materialize, I think it´s smarter to play the long game with Hillary.
        If this even was the real Hildebeast.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        CH, is it true that the sock-puppies here tonight just happen to be Strapon’s ISL or URL or whatever the hell it’s called?

        If so, well… what new heights of wadism and dweebery can she aspire to, here out?

        Like

    • Popcorn Out says:

      Agreed.

      We have to remember though that he is not a seasoned politician. She’s been doing this for decades, he’s been doing this for like a year. When you take that into account she ought to wipe the floor with him but it was pretty even.

      Like

      • hans says:

        You keep saying “seasoned politician” like it´s some kind of accolade.
        He´s a seasoned businessman, deal maker and New Yorker basterd.
        It´s a wonder SHE manages to hold on. 😉

        Like

      • Her ‘experience’ changed nothing. She sounded like a rerun of all her negative ads.

        Trump’s already got us, he didn’t need to serve dripping red meat. He shivved here and there, but nothing right in the solar plexus. That wasn’t his goal. His goal was to promote his presidential-ness to millions who have never watched him before. The other side did everything they could to build him up as the Krazy Klown, and he showed he’s a serious contender.

        The Trump landslide continues…

        Like

  114. -A says:

    lol at Trump calling out Hillary’s lack of stamina. Her rebuttal against it was just stupid understanding the context.

    Like

    • Publius says:

      Yep. she passed out at 9:30 AM on 9/11 and then took 2 weeks off, during which time he has literally worked about 160 hours.

      Like

  115. PA says:

    He appears to have a cold. And holy fuck the moderator is a worse than Candy Crawley.

    Like

  116. Carlos Danger says:

    Good ending

    Like

  117. -A says:

    What do his honest remarks have to do with stamina? Furthermore, his comments about women and the work place really are relevant to a woman running for presidency.

    Like

  118. -A says:

    Yeah, who knew a beaner cunt would vote for the cunt to cunt them all. Raping our nation with their third world bullshit.

    Like

  119. Dude says:

    She is coming off as much more presidential and statesman like. Too bad she’s an absolute liar, surrounded by dead bodies and other nefarious dealings throughout her past, with a philandering husband who was too stupid to keep his dicky dunkin a secret. Too bad she talks a good game but goes whatever way the political wind blows. A 90 minute debate isn’t going to change the fact that she a corrupt politico who tried to hide the fact that she was sending classified communications over a private server which is against the law. She should be in jail.

    Like

    • plumpjack says:

      Trump’s a ny bro and hiding it just doesn’t come naturally to him. I know the feeling. but if he could master that fuckin politician’s head -bobbing/speaking cadence thing he’d have it in the bag. it’s subtle but it’s effective. liar hillary has been doing it so long she could do it even in a coma.

      Like

  120. -A says:

    Losing the debate? Pussyache about Trump’s real talk in the locker room!

    Like

  121. -A says:

    That might explain a bit as to why Trump pulled his punches. Misplaced benign sexism? Misplaces sense of Edwardian Chivalry? Caste/Professional courtesy? Or maybe they still have some kind of working relationship, related to Caste/Professional courtesy.

    Listen to them say on one hand she “didn’t go there, pulled her punches” and at the same time “was on the attack, u go grrrl.”

    Like

    • -A “Misplaced benign….”>

      It must be pretty weird interviewing for a captain’s job when you’ve never even been on a ship.

      How would an accountant do on an interview with Trump if they’d never had a job as a bookkeeper?

      Like

      • carlos danger says:

        Accountants aren’t bookkeepers. They audit bookkeepers. This blog is run by one, I’m proud to say, as a CPA.

        Like

      • -A says:

        @Subway Masturbator

        Do what now? Isn’t the whole appeal of the democratic republican model that one does not have to be a career politician to vie for office? Besides, isn’t being a career politician about as suspect as being an oncologist?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        It must be pretty weird interviewing for a captain’s job when you’ve never even been on a ship.

        I suppose just any old ward heeler could shuffle on up to the House and take a crack at it, eh?

        If you’re just being a disingenuous ass and intimating that Trump has no leadership credentials, well.. you’re just being a disingenuous ass.

        But we knew that already, didn’t we?

        You fairy.

        Like

      • Yeah, anybody can just walk in and grasp the geopolitics, especially compared to guys like Jefferson who read Greek and Latin in the original and so helped found the country.

        As long as he’s a “bro” , and he’s Alpha. And can run a casino and dodge taxes.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        How did that Chicago ward heeler make his way into the Oval Office, kike?

        I didn’t… and don’t… hear you talking about any Greek or Latin scholars then.

        Ships or captains neither.

        So, this is your debate now? I thought you folks were supposed to be smart?

        Go earn your JIDF shekels elsewhere… the chateau deserves a better class of opponent.

        Like

  122. Publius says:

    Conclusion: the entire thing was a gay waste of time.

    Fuck this gay earth.

    What matters is that there is active discrimination against white fathers when it comes to jobs and careers.

    And we are not allowed to be “racist” or “notice” truth, even though feral 70 IQ niggers are going around in mobs beating up white girls.

    We can’t vote our way out of this.

    Liked by 2 people

    • uh says:

      You’ve said some harsh shit to me for saying exactly that.

      But I’m not mad. Welcome to nihilism – fag.

      Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      I’m with you. Feel the exact same way. Trump is not telling the Truth that needs to be told, which puts a win in her corner. Unspoken truths have no power over lies. He played by her game rules. Don’t know if that was his choice, or if he has some really shitty (planted??) advisors telling him to ‘Romney’ it up and play nice. F*ck that! This if war.

      Like

      • carlos danger says:

        He is playing the long game. I could tell he was biting his tongue. This was about not scaring the church ladies.

        Like

      • Dickery Dock says:

        Trump had one goal: Appear normal, not scary.

        Mission accomplished.

        Hildebeast had one goal: Appear human and likeable.

        Mission failed.

        Like

    • uh welcomes you to her hell, Publius!

      on February 27, 2016 at 8:05pm “uh” writes:

      “Italian-American women are much worse. They don’t soften. It isn’t sass; it’s pure ball-busting. Half Italian myself, two of my very worst experiences with women were with Italians — the only Italians I’ve been with, and ever will be. Something about their character is uniquely rotten.

      “Compared to that, black women can be charming and down to earth. When they’re not haughty and morose.”

      Saruh is having her little hour. She is, after all, really a Marxist. Don’t let the (((half-Italians))) get to you.

      Courage, Publius. Kerry and Romney rocked their first debates, and what did that do for them? I watched the whole thing: it wasn’t poetry, but it will do.

      We will prevail.

      Like

    • -A says:

      The way the most of us on the Nrx/Black Pill side of things view it, Trump is just a means of waking latent rightism. It is a band-aid as well as a beginning for a rightward drift.

      Like

  123. Scanman says:

    Trump had the easier job and he didn’t get it done.

    Two more debates + Assange. Stay tuned…

    Like

  124. Putin says:

    I have never seen a person fall into Hillary’s frame as easily as Donald did.

    [CH: i don’t think that’s the case at all. he had a couple missteps, but whatever frame thecunt was trying to box him into he promptly answered with his own framing of her.]

    Like

    • Sentient says:

      Why are alt right warriors so emo? Cmon look at the big picture here. Clinton won nothing… Other than sold buyers the tuning in audience came to see if Trump was as horrible as they all claim. And they saw a reasonablean who held frame and acted far more like a leader while he kept hammering away on issues in key swing states and his very relatable business experience.

      Hillary spent a week on prep for when he attacked her and all women ny proxy… She was straining to get her women card out on the table at the end, to little effect.

      Wait and see.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Putin says:

      He defended himself way too much. Should of ignored most of her weak attacks. He had plenty of opportunity to talk about the thousands of women and children she has helped kill in Syria, Libya, etc. Supporting questionable groups at best. All her wars and destabilization’s. Her obsession with wanting to go to war with Russia.

      Make no mistake I hate the evil one but she is amazing when is comes to re-framing her weaknesses onto Donald.

      [CH: she’s not “amazing”. rather, trump was not on top of his game, allowing her entry points. she is actually rather easy to corner and stick the shiv in, you just gotta remember to do it donald!]

      Like

      • Putin says:

        “trump was not on top of his game”- We can agree on this.

        “she is actually rather easy to corner and stick the shiv in”- Well I saw plenty of opportunity but because of the first point it did not happen.

        I sat there in awe as she lectured Donald about what not to do in regards to foreign policy. I still can’t believe she got away with a lot of that.

        Donald needs to keep it simple. The U.S. spent 3 trillion on wars in the middle east. Thousands and thousands of innocent women and children have died and suffered. We have supported questionable groups at best.
        Say that this is where he has to morally draw the line. Doesn’t know how she(Clinton) sleeps at night.

        Like

    • uh says:

      I missed about fifteen minutes. After that bar where I couldn’t watch it, I went to a steakhouse. All the servers were happy white kids around 20. They were curious about me watching it and I held forth with them a bit. One – 23, mother of two – made noises about Gary fucking Johnson. I went in hard: What do you want this society to be for your children? “I … I … Just want them to be safe.” – So do you achieve that by letting in more homicidal Muslims and Latino drug-runners or fewer? – “I don’t … I just want … ”

      It was like that for a solid ten minutes with no resolution. How the FUCK are they this naive.

      Like

      • uh says:

        Uh you idiot, it has nothing to do with reason, it has to do with women not submitting – even symbolically – to men who aren’t providing for them.

        Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      CH, there is no good support for TheDon on this one. He did a shitty job tonight. Looked bad, pulled easy punches, dragged on too long about stupid shit, rambled a few times, etc. He needs to fix his shit…quick!!

      Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Study Putin, Mr. Trump. He keeps his cool, and attacks/defends with statements where each word has a purpose. Nothing wasted, nothing unnecessary added. There is nothing wrong with pausing and gathering your thoughts. Never fill uncomfortable voids/gaps in replies with useless (possibly damaging) rambling.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Putin says:

        “Study Putin, Mr. Trump. He keeps his cool, and attacks/defends with statements where each word has a purpose. Nothing wasted, nothing unnecessary added. There is nothing wrong with pausing and gathering your thoughts. Never fill uncomfortable voids/gaps in replies with useless (possibly damaging) rambling”

        Excellent!.

        Like

      • carlos danger says:

        Putin takes notes in interviews. Who else does that?

        Like

  125. Dude says:

    BTW my local news channel is giving the win to Trump. They state he maintained momentum throughout the debate. Trump did miss a good opportunity to hammer her on emailgate as she claimed credit for sitting through a congressional inquiry with regards to her stamina. She wouldn’t have been there if she wouldn’t have tried to cover up her crime.

    Like

  126. PA says:

    “I was going to say some mean things about Hillary but that wouldn’t have been nice.” – Trump (paraphrased)

    Next time level her. He attacked her well mostly at the beginning but ran out of steam. This wasn’t his typical level of energy. The moderator didn’t even pretend to be impartial. My guess is that Trump has a cold. There are two more debates. Pull no punches next time.

    Like

    • Scanman says:

      Not a single person in the opposition is going to be nicer to him if he goes easy on her.

      Demolish her (in a presidential tone) and let’s get this franchise turned around!

      Like

    • Popcorn Out says:

      It wouldn’t surprise me one bit if he was saving the big guns for the last debate to maximise impact.

      As a seasoned alpha male, if there’s one thing Trump knows, it’s not to climax too soon.

      [CH: true. trump’s style is showmanship. he knows how to do takeaways and build anticipation.]

      Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        yes.

        Like

      • Libertardian says:

        That’s what I was thinking, as much as I would have liked to see a round one TKO. People have short memories and it would make sense to land the heavy punches at the end when she has less margin for recovery. Throwing haymakers right off would make more sense if he had to catch up, which he doesn’t.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        He does know anticipation and build up….i.e. when he had the whole MSM thinking he caved on immigration and doubled down instead.

        Like

      • Remember, OBAMA is widely credited with rope-a-doping Romney in round one of 2012.

        If Obama can do this, Trump– is the master of push-pull.

        And as it is, the most egregious weaknesses are simply going on about his business affairs, which looks defensive and of course, in light of the truth, is a kangaroo court tactic considering Hillary’s capital offenses. But clearing the air for low-info voters may be beneficial, and it leaves him room to go on the attack next.

        Yes, rapid, decisive reframes would’ve been better. But lines like the “you’ve had 30 years to” are impressive. Trump’s performance could’ve enjoyed more focus, but it was not sleepwalking.

        Like

      • (I mean Lester Holt was running a kangaroo court on Trump– it’s a travesty, but perhaps Trump has no better option in the moment than to boringly explicate his affairs. The sheer boring quotidian detail of it, sleep inducing as it may be for some, conveys a reassuring sense that all these things Hillary’s accusing him of are NO BIG DEAL.

        Hillary, after all, can offer no real explanation for her own conduct– indeed the truth of it is, the sky’s the limit in terms of just how vast the conspiracies she’s involved with reach. The so-called “FBI Informant” assured people that if the Clinton Foundation’s crimes came fully to light, there would be– he insisted– literal declarations of war.)

        Like

      • –To flesh this out one more tedious time: imagine you’re some idealistic kid growing up in a small town where your dad’s some kind of Atticus Finch (!) big deal or whatever.

        But people have started talking smack against pops for something he did. The local paper’s after him, the kids at school are repeating shit and telling you your daddy’s a crook, they say the pastor’s wife’s giving him the evil eye.

        So you get spooked, you worry somehow it could all be true. And you go and confront him.

        Oliver Stone in his “Nixon” has a little scene like this where Tricia or whichever goes in and asks him about Watergate. He denies any wrongdoing, which I assume is of course Stone’s way of dramatizing the idea he’d baldfacedly lie to his daughter (I think Stone means us to be sympathetic to his plight, but still).

        Now, your dad could take the Nixon approach, and maybe you’d be happy with that. But if you’re already sharp and maybe a bit cynical already about the world, maybe you don’t?

        But what if instead Dad actually treats you to some boring laundry list of his transactions and what the IRS always does in these situations and yadda yadda– “Okay Dad, I get it. Boy, I guess people are really stupid about this nonsense.”

        You walk off, a bit embarrassed for even going there, and thankful too you didn’t have to hear the whole damn 200 footnotes version of the real deal.

        Everything’s fine. It’s all just make-believe bullshit calumnies people concocted against him. –BORING calumnies.

        That whore of a pastor’s wife, on the other hand . . . .

        Like

      • uh says:

        Yeesh. Perhaps you should stick to stalking me? Such belabored writing.

        Like

      • Spiralina says:

        Saving the big guns until the end when the public has debate fatigue isn’t a smart strategy, though. The first debate gets the highest ratings and the most buzz. Everyone was anticipating this. All the “I agree with hers” and off-topic rambling made him look ill prepared. He should’ve hammered her right out the gate and then eased up later, to show both his aggression and his more reasonable side.

        Like

      • Sean Fielding says:

        “As a seasoned alpha male, if there’s one thing Trump knows, it’s not to climax too soon.”

        Threadwinner.

        Like

  127. -A says:

    Listen to Megyn sing his praises. Trump now has a perma-Thrall out of her. He tamed her.

    Liked by 1 person

  128. Popcorn Out says:

    The biggest win for the Donald was probably at the end when the families came on stage. Trump’s entourage looked bold, proud, stylish and respectable. The only person of note in the Clinton crowd was Bill’s reanimated corpse.

    Like

    • Makes sense. Pick your president on stylishness. The Nazis admittedly had cool uniforms, while gassing screaming, terrifed little Jew girls. By Hugo Boss I htink.

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        No one was gassed. The Chambers aren’t air tight and there is no chimney to evacuate the gas. That is a huge myth created by your Boys to leverage the Wests sense of altruism and make you above criticism while you set up your plan for world Domination through central Banking cabals. You will rule over the goyim as cattle. Fuck you Jerry.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I thought it was decided by unanimous decision that anyone who had to bring up the NAH-ZEEs was, ipso facto, sucking hind tit in Cyberian debate.

        I know I got the memo awhile back.

        Like

      • -A says:

        Damn right Hugo Boss, dindu onan. We’re the cool kids.

        Like

      • Hitler, Hitler, Hitler, fuck Godwin, Hitler Hitler Hitler, Jews Jews Jews–

        I used it and will continue to use it and you mustache boy masturbators (MBM) will just have to stomach it.

        It’s a good example of a charismatic asshole getting 20% of his nations people killed. I don’t think Trump is that crazy, but don’ you find his continual lying, about small things that don’t really matter, a little worrisome?

        Oh, I guess these pics are faked. Damn, they must have had every special effects guy in Hollywood out in the Polish countryside!!!

        How impressive and brave you MBM are, to want to crush all these people! How ALPHA!!!!

        Hey, even emotionaly crippled, inadequate personality holocaust deniers have to feel safe somewhere.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Where are all the gassed little girls? Oh, that’s right, there were none.

        If you want to swap atrocity photos from the 20th Century, that’s a different subject… and small hint: that’s a contest you can’t win, on numbers alone, comrade.

        Besides, pick one monicker and stick with it, Schlomo.

        Like

  129. Ripp says:

    total hack job against the Donald w the loaded questions about Iraq war and birther crap.

    But none for Shillary. gheeyy.

    Like

    • Random Guy says:

      I think the next debate the questions are picked by what the viewers want to see ahead of time. Which seems like it would favor Trump more than Hillary.

      Like

  130. PA says:

    Agnostic/Akinokure has tracked Trump’s campaign highs and lows, and several weeks ago picked up on a pattern, with this week being his final down-phase. He even predicted a lackluster first debate. But he is on pace to peak at election time.

    Like

    • -A says:

      I also got the impression that he was feeling things out. I don’t think they have every debated before tonight. He was getting a feel for what he could be aggressive on without looking like a lout to the voters he wants to secure and how she would be backed to the wall.

      Basically, he is adjusting and acclimating to now debating the actual opponent to his position. He has two more at least. He will plan for the “continuation of the discussion” as mysterymeatmoderator likes to put it.

      Like

  131. -A says:

    Interesting re-frame while talking to Hannity about not wanting to be crude about the cunt in front of her cunt-squirt. Who he claims to think is a very nice girl. Reality or just image building? Either way, tells a lot and could be a good tactic.

    He keeps on with the charge that the cunt will not make America great again. Good. He might have gotten a but tired after being up on stage, under the lights and not being able to elaborate on everything he wanted (keeping light on his feet) he seemed to get a fresh breath and energy boost once he was released from his podium and he never relented from his assessment of his opponent. For all those who think he somehow came out ultimately weak in the end, fear/gloat not.

    Like

  132. Trump commanded the stage and Hillary was visibly shaken. Her attempts at humor predictably bombed.

    I wish Trump had spent more time on Bernie Sanders wrt the DNC leak. I believe he also neglected to mention that Hillary voted for the Iraq war; he stumbled a bit on that and a few other questions towards the end.

    Good overall. Was hoping for a Hillary meltdown, but there’s still time.

    Like

  133. I thought maybe I am biased, but the team on the PBS news hour just said that it was not right for Hillary to call him Donald, they said the moderator was harder on Trump, they said some of Hillary answers are too long , too vague. They thought Trump would be stronger and they also think Hillary was not that good.

    Yup that is how I see it too.

    I thought Trump would be more aggressive, mention more embarrassing things about Hillary… he spent too much time defending himself.

    Liked by 1 person

    • plumpjack says:

      I wish he hadn’t gone on the defensive about not renting to googles. everyone knows you don’t rent to googles. that’s what jails and public housing are for. just say “we never discriminated against anyone. our goal as a business is to offer excellent housing to the best, most qualified tenants we could find and that’s what we did.” end of story.

      Like

    • I thought it would be more polite to call him Mr. Trump, although that then emphasizes his lack of any title or public office. But then again when someone has been callling you “crooked Hilary” I understand the impulse to deny him any courtesy.

      Like

  134. TLM says:

    Lastly, I don’t get the temperament/being Presidential nonsense. That dog quit hunting back in the 90’s when a gentile hick from Ark was ramming a cigar up a fat young Jew broad’s twat in the Oval Office annex and the democrats stood behind their boy .

    [CH: haha. good point.]

    Like

  135. Rum says:

    Always keep in mind, winning or losing comes down to biology over the long term… either moving forward or in reverse. “Politics” is just an (un) pretty wrapping over that truth.
    Ruthless truth telling re the google problem will hit the target and blow off body parts regardless of the success or failure of DJT.
    I have been accused of being a shill. The truth is, I am just an old southern guy whose ancestors fought for the south, and lost, then, but is fighting still today on the same lines..
    Hint: If the internet existed in 1861, the South would have won. At least in terms of getting their point across.
    And far too many (((eskimos))) actually fought for the south for me to even think of hating on them, even if they were not already Family.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      And far too many (((eskimos))) actually fought for the south for me to even think of hating on them, even if they were not already Family.

      There it is: he’s not “shilling”, he’s just sticking up for his family.

      Well, a few Southern rebels, a polio vaccine, and some neat Broadway musicals aren’t enough of a counterbalance to what your “already Family” has done in other areas of endeavor… you meshuggah hick. (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      Like

      • Rum says:

        Greg… My firm, of which I have been a longtime partner, recently cashed out /// Wall Street. Does the phrase 8:1 translate into English? Whatever.
        And please, if I may ask this favor:: I am going to die, eventually. Nonetheless… Put on my tombstone “He stuck up for his family.” and we are even.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Do they actually have tombstones in mausoleums?

        Muh money, eh? The yid equivalent of muh dik.

        It’s been said innumerable times here, it’s understandable when anyone, even the opposition, sticks up for their family.

        And last recalled, you (ahem) frontrunners have cornered the market on that networking thing, painting it to us goyim as y’all yes’ smarter, and we’s jes’ jealous.

        But when you couch the diverting, distracting, and general stream-of-consciousness shilling as coming from merely an objective observer, well… that dog jes’ don’t hunt.

        btw, it took a long time for y’all to finally admit it.

        Like

      • Jay says:

        Greg Eliot,

        Your two comments re Rum’s self-presentation, tactics and ethnic purpose could not be more correct. Their intellectual contributions are an ounce compared with the tons of destruction they have done to Western Civilization.

        Like

      • Scanman says:

        620,000 killed on both sides. 600 of those were Jews. 600.

        Oy vey!!! It was the first Shoah, goys!!!

        Like

    • Scanman says:

      “hating on” = “telling the truth about”

      Said another way, “I cover up reprehensible conduct because I’m an honorable fellow.”

      Fuck you.

      Manson had a “family” too…

      Like

    • carlos danger says:

      Rum, I’m a Southern boy myself. J*** were not in the infantry and did not ride with NBF or Jeb Stuart or fight side by side with Stonewall in the Shenandoah. They were wealthy landowners and cotton brokers and carried on as they always have. They were pretty mercenary in their efforts to exploit the local situation economically to the point that Grant had to ban them from his areas of occupation. You’re not despised in the South because you knew not to fuck with the locals until recently. That’s not the case elsewhere in the country.

      Like

  136. fightersword says:

    Honestly I get the idea trump’s campaign probably told him to pull it back some on the offense as a strategy here. Kind of like the whole idea that alphas doing a leetle show of beta provider for LTR every now and then while still maintaining their alphatude can be a good strategy. Sadly a debate is not the place for that; he should have been on the hard offensive the whole time.

    Like

  137. Amasius says:

    Trump– the non-politician– edged it, and immigration didn’t even come up. He’ll do better in the next two. Hil’s got nothing.

    Like

  138. Vincent says:

    So that video is what happens to HRC voters. Fine by me.

    Like

  139. chaoserrant says:

    The last debate is far more important because both sides learn from the first battle. She attacked dirty right at the end when Donald did not have time to retort with the same stinker. He did manage to allude/threat to the fact that he could have ran dirty adds against her (hinting probably at Bill’s scandal and the like). So, for Trump, it is important to prepare some under the belt shivs toward the end of the debate.

    [CH: yep. no one remembers the first debate at election time. does anyone recall how GWB did in all his debates? he stuttered a lot but substantively i don’t recall a thing about them. he won anyhow.]

    Like

    • greginaurora says:

      When Gore walked up on GWB and GWB gave him the nod… That’s the only thing I remember about those debates

      Like

      • Minesweeper says:

        Yep, its the non verbal cues in body language that you remember, GWB could barely speak without both feet in his mouth, but still managed to give assurance non verbally that he was the one to trust.

        Like

  140. Anton McDowell says:

    When Hillary hit him with the “you called women pigs and dogs” that was the perfect time to bring out the “women are the primary victims of war, they lose their husbands, sons, and fathers in battle” card. Why didn’t he. Is he going to leave that card unplayed. What the hell.

    [CH: in fairness to trump (or anyone on stage) it’s not easy remembering all the shivs in one’s utility belt. but yeah trump has to (will do) better in the next two debates. he has a surfeit of anti-cunt ammo that’s going to waste.]

    Like

  141. Trump, true to his mission, is bringing fathers and sons together. While watching the debate with my dad, I was delighted and encouraged to hear my dad ask questions that Trump then answered, give answers that Trump then affirmed, and vocalize a shiv or two that Trump then, ahem, inserted.

    Highlights our of triTrumpic bonding: 1). My dad commenting, “Looks how he takes charge”; 2). My dad noticing that Trump was not afraid to give specific answers while Hellary gave political platitudes; and 3). (as the candidates et al. were shaking hands post debate) My dad commenting, “Trump has a much better looking family, which probably makes blacks angry because his family is white and attractive.” (Bonus material: My dad dismissively saying, “Look at the “Rev.”[You could hear the scare quotes in his voice.] Jackson. Anything he is for, I’m against.)

    Good God, I wish my dad still drank–we’d be having even more of a grand evening.

    Make America a Family Again.

    [CH: i was touched by this comment. really.]

    Liked by 3 people

    • Sentient says:

      Nice – I got to do the same with my 12 and 13 YO’s…

      They could not believe Lester Holt LOL…

      Like

      • The time spent together was nice. My dad and I don’t hunt, fish, or build/destroy things together, so I value shiv-times like this one spent together. In thinking about last night, I realize that I saw flashes of alpha in my dad. This disposition has lain dormant in him for some time, but is now reemerging. Perhaps we could also say this:

        Trump–Make Fathers Alpha Again.

        Like

  142. Does hover handing a kid mean you’re a pedo?

    Like

  143. Towards the end Hillary complained that Trump believes that ; ” women should only get equal pay if they can work as well as men”

    hum……what is Hillary saying?

    that women can not do as good a job as men?

    yet they should get the same pay for lower quality work?

    that was weird.

    Like

    • hans says:

      Yeah, THAT was The D´s only gaffe, IMHO.
      Of course cunts get the same pay ONLY when the can do the job just as good as men.

      But that´s Hillaries America, I guess.
      It´s scarier than any horror flic.
      And I thought Merkel was bad.

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Mutti Merkel is sweet in comparison. Mutti Merkel fears for her life because the globalists own her and are using Deutsch Bank as leverage over her. The German press also came out and said HRC won by a nose. The German press is heavily invested in HRC and trash talk DT non stop. I hope to see President Trump greeting Chancelor Petry in 2017.

        Like

    • Minesweeper says:

      “Towards the end Hillary complained that Trump believes that ; ” women should only get equal pay if they can work as well as men””

      that was truly hilarious, i cant believe she actually said that.

      Like

      • Lazy Hero says:

        I caught that as well… The whole equal pay is crying wolf now, Hitler sounded like a broken record all night.

        Like

    • That was a delicious little ‘Freudian slip’.

      I’m not sure Trump needed to jump on it. It’s meme-able.

      It’ll be good if it starts to percolate in the public consciousness, rise closer to the top.

      Like

  144. fakeemail says:

    Trump should’ve performed better.

    Regardless of the two-on-one treatment, he had some fantastic openings to smash HIllary on her emails (the hacking/cybersecurity section), the Clinton foundation (when she disparages him for wealth); and Benghazi.

    He whiffed all these beautiful openers!

    And he could have brought up illegal immigration in terms of job killing, low wages, and “urban” crime. He was not on point when he should have been.

    And here’s what he should’ve said when pressed about calling women insulting names: “So what? Women are allowed to be insulted just like men are. I’m sure Secretary Clinton has called several women far worse names than I ever have, believe me.”

    [CH: well hopefully trump is reading this blog and comment section for ammo to take into the next two debates.]

    Like

    • Popcorn Out says:

      Valid points and the latter shiv was enjoyable.

      But if he’d done what you said it would have been a virtually perfect performance. He’s only been a politician for a year plus, and yet he held his own against someone who’s been doing this for decades. That’s a win of sorts. He will only improve. She won’t.

      Like

    • GB says:

      She looked weird, stoned on a professional mix of premium stuff. I’m wondering if the gig has changed used to be visuals were everything but I had two screens and a phone going, paid more attention to the audio then visual. Trump won both, she just did better than dropping dead which is impressive for her.

      Like

    • Hillary does call people awful names, several people who worked for Bill Clinton have written books in which they mention how she screamed and yelled at employees and told them to fvck off.

      Like

    • Tuna says:

      Do we have any proof the Trumpster reads the glorious bastion of truth known as the Chateau? He really needs to read this thread. This is life-or-death shit going on. I don’t want to live under sharia law…

      Like

  145. Captain Obvious says:

    Remember that what all of us saw – as policy wonks and [at least amateur] behavioral theorists – is NOT necessarily going to be what “Joe Sixpack Undecided” or “Jane Single Mom Undecided” saw. Your own person – your very nature – badly affects your perception of things. Wait and watch for e.g. Frank Luntz’s analysis of it all. As an example, the early prognosis is that Undecideds were aghast at her calling him “Donald” while he very professionally & consistently referred to her as “Secretary Clinton”. Little things like that – which we mistakenly attempt to categorize via Game Theory & Dark Triad obnoxiousness – can be yuuuggggge with the Low Information Voter [LIV] Undecideds.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Another example – illary spent about half a BILLION dollars in the last few months trying to paint The Donald as being too psychologically unstable to serve as president, but after tonight’s performance, all of that money is proving to have been flushed right down the toilet – half a BILLION thrown at the Trumpening with nothing to show for it.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Where does illary pivot to now that The Donald has proven to be psychologically fit for the office? “Wah wah wah, you won’t release your tax returns!” “Wah wah wah, you want to cut taxes whereas I want to raise taxes!” “Wah wah wah, you’re a racist and oops let’s just forget about super predators!” What does her campaign amount to at this point? Heck, what CAN her campaign hope to amount to?

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        RUSH: “…what has been Hillary’s number one thing, issue, subject of her ads that she’s been running for a hundred million dollars? I don’t know how many millions, but it’s just been substantial. Her ads are attacking Trump on what basis, what premise? That he’s unsuitable, right? He’s not fit for office. This guy doesn’t have the temperament, doesn’t have the qualifications. He’s an embarrassment. He’s dangerous….”

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        RUSH: “Hillary thought she had ample opportunity to make that point last night, but she didn’t, did she?… She had to demonstrate that Donald Trump doesn’t deserve to be the Republican nominee. She had to demonstrate that Donald Trump has not earned and doesn’t deserve to even be going toe-to-toe with her on that stage, and she doesn’t do that. There’s not a single person when this was over that said Trump didn’t belong…. Trump demonstrated his earned position as a major party nominee; he had every business, every right being up there…”

        Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Presidential debate surprise: Clinton loses ground among some voters in swing stateRead more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article104382951.html

      Like

  146. A Wise Man says:

    Ugh he could have hit her so many times and he failed to do so. E.g. Benghazi, trying to start WWIII with Russia, smearing the women her husband had an affair with, repeating the Iraq disaster in Syria. FUCK ME!

    Like

    • hans says:

      Heh, and then he would´ve wasted his best shots on the most unimportant of the 3 debates.
      This was not great but good enough.

      In a way he “aloofed” his own fans, didn´t he?
      Instead of giving the silly spectacle that everybody wanted, we got a mostly tepid affair.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Random Guy says:

        That’s a good point; consider all that Hillary throw at him, possible racism back in the day, birther issues, sexism, business angle’s etc…..what else does she have to use for the next two debates? She came out swinging with all her best power hits and now nothing is left for the next 2/3rds of the fight. And nobody will remember or care if she had a point or not about them by then.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        > “She came out swinging with all her best power hits and now nothing is left for the next 2/3rds of the fight.” ——— My point just above here. She threw half a billion dollars at the idea of him being psychologically unfit to occupy the oval office, and what does she have to show for it after tonight? Where does she go from here? What picture will she have painted in voters’ minds? What is the purpose of her candidacy [from the voters point of view]? What would Hillary Clinton’s America look like [from the voters point of view]? I’m sensing a great big DONUT.

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        It’s time, again, to realize that Trump is really and truly different and only HE knows what he is doing and why it works. And as a natural, he probably can’t even explain it.

        Just be cool, bro… is his watchword.

        Spergs and nice guys in frog’s clothing just don’t get that…

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Did nay of you even see him charm her early, her face when he asked if he could call her Secretary Clinton? Took a lot of the bite right out of her… yeah she hit her talking points but she lacked conviction…

        Like

      • A Wise Man says:

        I hope that’s his strategy.

        Like

  147. Oleaginous Outrager says:

    “Nobody remembers the first debate come election time”

    Why does this school election shit even still exist? When there wasn’t 24-7 global news coverage , they mattered somewhat, to define the candidates. Now, they’re just rent-seeking opportunities for the parasite talking-head class.

    Seriously, if this bullshit was so important, why is there not one international, national, state or local issue decided by a moderated, televised debate, with results determined by “asking random assholes” polls afterward?

    Like

  148. Corvo says:

    I’d say it was a draw, but with a better performance he could have slaughtered her.

    She accuses him of having something to hide by not showing his tax returns
    —> he should have hit her right back about not releasing the text of her speeches to (((Goldman Sachs))) and all the money she raked in from corrupt foreign govts and dictators;

    She accuses him of insulting women
    —> apologist and attack dog for a serial rapist / sexual abuser;

    He mentions her “missing” email on a tangent but doesn’t swing at the easiest softball during the discussion of cyber security … “Hillary is the last person to be put in charge of cyber security, she can’t keep her own email secure because she’s so concerned with hiding her deeds” … softball

    She goes after him for “not paying” some two bit construction contractor for some bullshit
    —> he should have hammered home the thousands of jobs he’s created while she’s done nothing but work in government for the past 40 years, and has raked in millions selling influence like a corrupt third world politician;

    She says he’s racially sensitive and discrminatedb against blacks
    —> push back, sure, but tie Hillary to Black Lies Matter and the racial hatred they’ve whipped up, and say he’s the only one on stage to say “all lives matter”

    These are basic “go to” points he should have been prepared on. He needs to step up his game for the next debate.

    [CH: all valid criticisms. are you reading, herr trumpening?]

    Liked by 1 person

    • uh says:

      As far as points scored, I also think it was a draw. Not that I rate her points higher, just as far as public perception goes.

      Everyone’s forgetting that he missed easy shots all over the place in the Republicunt debates. I’ll repeat what I said then: he isn’t witty. Rubio was better at that kind of repartée. Not that I like Rubio, lol.

      Basically, he’s coasting on reputation here. So far it’s been enough to edge him into the lead in some good states. And you’re right, it will hinge on the last debate.

      Like

      • “Not that I like Rubio, lol.”

        His daughters, on the other hand:

        “Fag or not … both of his daughters get the Pedobear stamp of approval.”

        uh wrote on February 8, 2016 at 9:37am (“Marco Roboto”)

        Like

      • uh says:

        Uh huh. And I joke about a 12 year old up there somewhere. And you wank to Asian girls.

        MUH MORALS

        Like

    • Putin says:

      “I’d say it was a draw, but with a better performance he could have slaughtered her.”

      Yep

      Like

    • whorefinder says:

      #Trump only had to solve one problem at the debate: Seem less scary. He did. Think about it.

      — Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) September 27, 2016

      Like

    • Experienced Father says:

      Corvo,

      Trump was over prepared by people too concerned about preventing a mistake.

      Neither Trump nor Hillary made a mistake, so no minds were changed in the making of that debate.

      That leaves the dynamic of Trump being a “change candidate” in a “change election”…

      …unchanged.

      Like

  149. Stilicho says:

    Tldr debate summary:
    Trump promised to make America great again.
    Hillary promised to fact check Putin.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Exactly. Low Information Voters don’t give a d@mn about all the intricacies of this nonsense. They want Big Picture stuff. illary is whining about minutae like tax returns whereas as The Donald is painting a picture in peoples’ minds about a more wonderful future for them & for their progeny.

      Like

    • mendo says:

      Yeah, pretty much.

      Putin’s really in her head, maybe more so than El Donaldo.

      Like

  150. Minesweeper says:

    watch the debate with the sound off, watching hilary is like being slapped in the face, trump on the other hand is comforting.

    94% of memory is nonverbal body language apparently. even though trump made a few mistakes in front of a 200M audience (we can forgive him) the non verbal body language he displayed was completely different from hillarys.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Exactly. Low Information Voters [LIVs] aren’t watching the debate with their forebrains; they’re watching the debate with their HINDBRAINS!!!!!

      Like

      • Minesweeper says:

        HINDBRAINS – arnt we all watching with that too ??

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Good God, no. If you’re obsessing with topics like Evo-Psych, then you’re easily top 1% of 1% [1 in 10,000] and arguably more like top 1% of 1% of 1% [1 in 1,000,000]. Statistically speaking, you’re so deeply invested in FOREBRAIN thinking that, vis-a-vis the general public, you don’t even exist – not even as statistical noise in the background.

        Like

      • uh says:

        It’s weird when the cock swastika guy says something that’s your whole life.

        Like

      • carlos danger says:

        CO says shit like that all the time

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Both the Breitbart Poll [huge sample] & the Charlotte Observer Focus Group [smaller sample] are now showing big wins for The Donald amongst undecided/leaning voters, which is all that matters.

        Like

    • Minesweeper says:

      or rather, what you remember from someone speaking like an hour at church\townhall etc when recalled weeks\months later is almost all their non verbal body language (no citation i know)

      amazingly enough, on Sky-UK they had a (AA female) previous campaign adviser for the clintons say this just as the debate started (watch with the sound off) – not often you hear something of value in the newsrooms.

      Like

  151. Johnny Redux says:

    “What might Donald be hiding in his tax records?” Really, TheCunt went there, and TheDon did not hammer her with: “What were you hiding in the 30,000+ emails, and at least 12 smart devices, that you purposely had destroyed AFTER the investigation of you began. That’s criminal, and the FBI is not doing its job, but will under my watch! How many messages regarding donations from Saudi Arabia were destroyed? How many emails back and forth with George Soros? How many emails discussing illegal weapon deals with our enemies in North Africa and the Middle East to try and force regime change in places like Libya and Syria? And you wonder about my tax returns? You really are a piece of work!”

    Like

    • Lazy Hero says:

      I may be completely wrong but I wonder if Trump is setting up Hitler and the media, that is he’s going to release his taxes after letting them make this the biggest case why he shouldn’t be POTUS. And he’s taxes will show how rich and generous he is.

      Like

  152. Days of Broken Arrows says:

    I think Trump’s team had him not lay into her so hard because they feared he’d end up like Rick Lazio — who was perceived as a bully and lost the senate election to her in 2000. It’s different competing against women. You have to calibrate differently. Maybe next time it will be different. He needs to be sharper; not necessarily tougher. The issues speak for themselves.

    Like

    • uh says:

      Was just texting that to a buddy. He reeled back too far in not playing into anticipation of coming off as “nasty”. If the cucks are applauding, you’re fucking up.

      Like

  153. greginaurora says:

    Trump went into this with a headcold and managed to pull off a tie.

    Even if he was off his game tonight, that just shows how much better he is.

    When Hillary gets sick, handlers chuck her flopping body into a van. Trump ties Presidential Debates.

    Liked by 1 person

  154. Putin says:

    The winner tonight was Hillary’s make-up artist and pharmaceutical manager.

    Liked by 1 person

  155. paulyester says:

    I was listening to, not watching the debate. I couldn’t place her tone of voice until I suddenly remembered this oldy but goody.

    Like

  156. The Question says:

    I thought it was rich when Hillary said she talked to people Trump has “stiffed.”

    I’m sure Trump would love to talk to people Hillary has stiffed – if they weren’t all stiff.

    Like

  157. Tuna says:

    Ugh, watching Seth Meyers now, just to get perspective from the shitlib controlled MSM. Absolutely gross. Believe me. Ha.

    Like

  158. Greg Eliot says:

    His hair was perfect.

    Like

  159. This Eve bitch is the return of our old troll Lilly. She was the most persistent and obnoxious troll we have ever had here, bar none. That bitch manufactured squid ink. She was the best illustration imaginable why one should not get involved with Jewesses.

    Like

  160. Just want to leave this article for the Chateau.

    Very sly Trump bashing by the NY Times.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/31/arts/howard-stern-sirius.html?_r=0

    The article is about how he has evolved into a great interviewer, and further away from his more “distasteful” past.

    See if you can spot the Trump bashing. They make a little reference to Trump and Stern trading misogynistic “quips”, over the phone (on the air). Of course they frame this section as being about Stern. Like, oh by the way, of all the many examples of Sterns’ “misogynist” past we thought we’d briefly share this exchange between him and Trump. Just nice and casual journalism.

    Pretty clever, although very transparent if you ask me.

    Bunch of liberal fucks.

    Like

  161. ho says:

    I knew something was wrong when Trump didn’t skewer the bitch for implying that low taxes on the wealthy and “trickle down economics” (none of which Trump proposed) were responsible for the great recession (as opposed to bailouts, low interest rates and banning racial discrimination when giving out loans to beaners).

    He also gave answers to questions he should’ve explicitly ignored (wgaf about birtherism). Finally, I would’ve liked him point out every passive aggressive quip and illogical statement she made, no matter how well hidden. (people who post responses on Twitter also launch nukes in rage, cuz nukes and tweets are equally dangerous)

    That being said, even if his performance was worse, his platform/policies annihilate sick Hillary’s.

    I mean what are the fucking odds that normal viewers didn’t notice her smug bitchiness. (“he was born lucky/privileged”)

    Women’s obnoxiousness is underrated.

    Like

  162. Caramba says:

    I obviously support Trump but must admit that he was not very convincing during the debate.

    His weakest point is the tax return and he will be hit on it again and again.He should sort it out and publish it.

    Like

    • Putin says:

      Trump did not respond well to Hillary’s re-framing. He needed to stop getting so defensive.

      Example: What I have done with my taxes is perfectly legal. (STOP.)

      What you have done with your emails containing highly sensitive material has been very unethical. The coverup you and your people have been involved in with the emails raises serious questions in regards to trust and security. The whole situation has left a black mark on the FBI and seems to have put that agency in compromising position as well. Most people would have gone to jail for what you did.

      Like

  163. Putin says:

    I can’t even sleep after that abortion of a debate. I really like Donald but the deep state will be too much to overcome. He way underestimates the depth of evil he is dealing with. I would not be surprised if he is getting misinformed by some advisors. Pence has me real concerned as he seems to be towing the full neocon agenda.

    Again it was simply amazing how Hillary re-framed her weaknesses. She is crafty but I am starting to think she has to be getting CIA support.

    Example: To cover up her deep state goal of nuclear war with Russia she redirects the issue to “Donald can’t be trusted with the nuclear codes as he is too unstable”. Of course it works like a charm.

    Another example: Hillary’s subversion of democracy by planting Debbie Wasserman as the head of the DNC so they could sabotage low IQ Bernie. When the DNC got “hacked” it was found out what had transpired. Debbie Wasserman resigned over the incident and immediately joined Clinton’s team. Of course Donald could not explain to America this incredible corruption because Hillary re-framed it as a Russian hacking issue. To add insult to injury Donald was part of the problem because he praises Putin, which she framed as a bad thing also. Just FUCKING amazing. She did it all night while baiting Donald into defending himself. Her redirection was CIA grade.

    The scariest part of all this was at the end when Donald raised his number one concern which was nuclear war. This also happens to be my biggest concern as well as Putin’s. Putin has stated ad nauseam that the U.S. is hell bent on going down that road. Anyway the look Hillary gave in regards to that whole issue was creepy. You could just tell that she is planning on heading into the triple deluxe bunker with her family at some point.

    The betting odds are going through the roof for Hillary. Not good.

    Far lower hemisphere if she gets elected.

    Like

  164. Eve says:

    Oh looky, after the debate Trump is whinging that “they gave me a defective mike” and “wonders” if it was “on purpose.” I guess HE doesn’t think it will well. How alpha of him to make excuses and blame others for his poor performance. (I understand the poor fellow had a cold too.)

    An alpha can’t say in the moment, “hey guys, fix my mike”? Anyway, his complaint makes no sense. Maybe that we could actually hear his non-answers?

    Like

    • Eve says:

      I guess he doesn’t think it went well.

      Like

      • But it went well.

        Trump is the clear winner according to many polls!!!

        Time poll has 51 % Trump/ 49% Hillary…

        .CNBC has 63% Trump / 37% Hillary…

        ABC has Trump at 54% …

        Nate Silver of project 538 says if elections were held today Trump would win about 55% of the votes.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Back to the wash house for you!

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I guess he’s a perfectionist, then.

        Like

      • Eve says:

        Canadian Friend,

        Point taken that at the end of the day all that will matter are the results of the election. I don’t pretend to know who will win. You mentioned Nate Silver who actually says it’s too early to say what effect this debate will have on the polls. He cites a CNN poll in which Hillary won by an enormous margin, though he acknowledges that the sample is Democratic leaning.http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/clinton-won-the-debate-which-means-shes-likely-to-gain-in-the-polls/

        As for snail trails – mentioned by another commenter- what a delightful term. I gather it refers to the trail left by the wet pussies women supposedly have for Mr. Trump. If, indeed, women are dying to sleep with a petulant, overweight, elderly man with a bad hairpiece, it doesn’t seem to be doing him any good in the polls, where he famously has an UNFAVORABILITY rating of 70% among women. I guess most of us just want to use him for his massive cock but don’t actually trust him to run the world.

        But really it’s amazing to me how much you guys are desperate to sleep with the guy YOU think is cool. Homo-erotic much?

        Like

      • Eve says:

        Oh, I do have a typing problem. I meant to say you guys are desperate to believe women want to sleep with DT, the guy you think is cool.

        Like

      • Wrong Side of History says:

        I think PA is right about this being a dude.

        Like

      • Wrong Side of History says:

        Burn it.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Snailtrails it is. You see, we understand women here. We know your code. All of us do very well with the ladies.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        His 70% negative is with ugly Feminist women. Real women who aren’t road kill on two legs are big fans. If you met him, you’d be all giggly and charmed yourself. Sorry Daddy didn’t love you. My daughter thinks I’m the greatest thing alive because I cherish her. I’m sad for you that you didn’t get that either.

        Like

      • Eve says:

        Carlos,

        Oh yes, the famous Donald charm! That’s when the Donald lowers his voice and says things like, “you’re very beautiful, you know,” which he seems to do in a lot of situations. You don’t even need to read a blog like this to clearly see the thought bubble above his head: “Women are stupid. They just want attention from a man. I will tell her she is very beautiful and she will be at my feet!” If it were that easy, every guy would be doing it and you’d all be getting laid! And if it were that easy, he’d have that ugly chick vote.

        Like

      • Eve says:

        It’s great that you cherish your daughter, Carlos. How do you square that with the general disdain for women expressed on this site?

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Easy, it teaches me about the animal nature of woman and I know how to deal with them constructively and effectively so she won’t destroy her happiness by being a demonic feminist. Sorry your father didn’t care enough.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Isn’t it obvious women of quality want the Donald? The women who hate him are all well past whatever prime they had. Melania is my Kind of woman. Hats off for that alone. His Family is also worthy of Emulation. You are just a miserable lefty, as all of them are. So Huma, are you looking to replace Anthony? If you want, we can all take up a Collection and send you some dick pics so you know what ist like to be one of his plates.

        Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      Oh looky, a Feminist playing neener neener. You don’t get this. Whether Trump wins or not, your party is over. We are no longer playing nice.

      Liked by 2 people

      • mendo says:

        She sounds like a freshman taking her first gender studies class and the femcunt professor informed her about this site so she’s trying to work on what she’s learned in three weeks, now that the whole world makes sense…

        …to her.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Like I said Eve, your gal is a bloodthirsty murderer. Your Moral compass is in the toilet and you have nothing useful to say to me.

        Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      You’re leaving snail trails talking about Trump like that. It’s ok, even if he wouldn’t have you. He gets all the women hot and bothered.

      Like

    • whorefinder says:

      whinging

      lol. nice spelling there, little girl. perhaps when you learn how to type correctly, the adults will take you seriously.

      there there *pats on head*

      poor wittle retard rape!

      Like

      • Eve says:

        Do you not know the word “whinging,” Whoremaster?

        Like

      • whorefinder says:

        Trying to pass off your misspelling as your using a Britishism on an American blog: hilarious.

        I’m sorry your daddy didn’t love you, little girl. Now go learn how to spell and you can join the adults.

        *pat pat*

        Bad speller rape!

        Like

      • Eve says:

        Nice try, Whoremaster. Why do you randomly end your sentences with “rape”? Do you have Tourette’s Syndrome?

        Like

      • whorefinder says:

        lol. aww, its cute, the little bad speller is trying to change the subject to hide her failure to know how to spell basic words.

        But you haven’t proven you belong at the big kids’ table, little one. Post a nude pic to gain cred.

        Stupid feminazi rape!

        Like

      • uh says:

        You know it’s female cause it has to ask what all the obvious jokes mean. Did anyone listen to the Shoah with that absolute ditz from Vice? “So, um, what’s Pepe mean?” The uterati can’t unnastan our good spirits. Now let’s all stop responding to it so it goes back to its kitty cat and cough drops.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Eve says:

        I wonder if Tourette’s is catching, Whoremaster? Maybe I will randomly start ending all my responses to you with “alimony!”

        Thanks for the invitation to post a nude. It must be tough being THAT horny and unsatisfied that you’re randomly soliciting nudes from random internet commenters.

        You are fun to play with though. Pet pet. Aw poor little horny misogynist alimony!

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        So Eve, how can you support someone so demonstrably evil and blood thirsty as a high minded Marxist? You must be blood thirsty and evil yourself. This is what happens to girls whose fathers don’t love them. Can’t say I blame him.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Eve says:

        Carlos,
        Straight answer to non-straight question. I don’t view Hillary as bloodthirsty or evil, but I definitely understand that she’s got her flaws. But mostly, I’m voting for her because I think the Donald is an unprepared moron. Is he canny enough to have tapped into the deep vein of discontent in this country? Is he canny enough to get ratings by mouthing off? Sure! But does that translate into actually being able to conduct high level diplomacy, learn things from advisers on subjects he doesn’t know about or put the interests of this country ahead of his batshit crazy ego? Not so much.

        I mainly came on this site because I was amazed to see Donald described as some kind of cool alpha dog. I think that arguably you could describe some heroes of the right that way. Maybe Ronald Reagan. Can you imagine him
        engaging in tit-for-tat with a campaign rival about whose wife is hotter or bragging to a TV pundit about how much pussy he gets?

        Like

      • whorefinder says:

        @Lilith, Feigning to be Eve:

        Maybe I will randomly start ending all my responses to you with “alimony!”

        Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, little bad spelling one.

        But you’re just not mature enough to know that yet.

        Thanks for the invitation to post a nude.

        TITS or GTFO.

        You are fun to play with though.

        It’s the closest a man’s ever come to touching you. Naturally, you’re thrilled.

        Pet pet.

        See above about imitation.

        Feminazi is getting a hard on for whorefinder rape!

        Like

      • Eve says:

        Whorefinder,

        I don’t show my tits to 5-year-olds – though I grant you that I’m impressed that such a little boy knows about Lilith.

        But really, you are lashing out because you know you are helpless and terrified before my pussy (and that of any woman) – the source of all life, the connection to the infinite, the place you spend so much time and effort and energy all your life struggling to return to.

        Look, I’m just a person. It’s not my fault I was born with a body part and a reproductive capacity that inspires you with a sublime sense of awe. You want to convince yourself and the other boys that you’ve got a bunch of bitches on a string. In reality, you’re dying to be dommed by a beautiful, confident woman. Ass up, sweetie.

        Ass up high alimony!

        Like

      • whorefinder says:

        @Lilith, not Eve:

        It’s so adorable to watch you try to ape me in your vain attempts to quash your wetness at my presence. Almost every sentence you write is now controlled by what I write. We can all see your innate desire to submit to me, despite your feminazi religion barring you from it and your tiny little bad spelling brain being so thoroughly mind-fucked by Mr. Soros that you deny it.

        now, please your master even more: TITS or GTFO.

        Living rent free in her head rape!

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Evie, thank whatever odd-god it is that you pray to that you do have that “awesome” reproductive power, and that even the ugliest of your gender can find some man, any man to avail himself of it.

        Otherwise, there’d be a bounty on you harpies.

        And for the record, if you’re going to wiggle your tits to us about your innate biological talents that required no effort, at least show a little more respect for the lives you proudly claim to be able to bear, and stop aborting them when you fear they might inconvenience your Sex In The City go-grrl imaginings.

        Like

      • Eve says:

        Whorefinder,

        C’mon, you know and I know and we both know that you didn’t know the word “whinging” before. Say thank you nicely and I will lube you up, open you gently to start and then plough your sweet little ass with my gigantic strap-on.

        Why don’t you just accept your desires instead of getting so angry at all the pretty women who make you feel all squirmy and funny in your pants? Everyone will be happier. Ass up!

        Alimony!

        Like

      • Eve says:

        Greg,

        I don’t think having a pussy and a uterus is that big a deal. As I said, I’m just a person born with a female body and plugging away at the business of life. You’re the ones with all this awe and desire and fear and neuroses about women.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Well, at least we now know, indisputably, that this latest visitor is your usual suspect foul-mouthed yenta, in the SS vein (Schumer/Silverman, lozozlozl)…

        … or yet another queer come to the chateau to play his Broadway female Jekyll/Hyde shtick of part tasked ingenue/bitchy harridan personae.

        (Hook emerges from stage left, cattle-call director cries: “NEXT!”)

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I don’t think having a pussy and a uterus is that big a deal.

        You mean the body parts you so recently described as, and I quote:

        …the source of all life, the connection to the infinite…

        ?

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        “I don’t show my tits to 5-year-olds…”
        (truth. or two year olds, or six month olds. IOW spinster.)

        “terrified before my [roadworn] pussy (and that of any [past-prime] woman)…”
        FIFY. and yes, of course we’re terrified. we’re also terrified of anal-rectal cancer.

        “the [potential] source of all life [when not squandered on cock-carouseling]…”
        FIFY.

        “…connection to the infinite, the place you spend … [as minimal] effort and energy [as possible] all your life struggling to return to [if she’s young and FERTILE]…”
        FIFY.

        “It’s not my fault I was born with a body part and a reproductive capacity…”
        no, but it’s your fault for wasting it.

        “…that inspires you with a sublime sense of awe.”
        post pics. we’ll let you know.

        “In reality, you’re dying to be dommed by a beautiful, confident woman. Ass up, sweetie.”
        translation: “i’m a bitter, past-prime, childless, slut that no decent guy chases anymore, so I have to chase them (betas) instead.”

        Liked by 1 person

      • Eve says:

        Greg,

        I don’t think I’m that foul-mouthed. When I started commenting, I was immediately called a “bitch” and a “cunt” – apparently just for having an opinion that deviates from the consensus here. In contrast, I’ve only used some earthy language to describe some lovely, friendly, consensual activities after Whorefinder signaled sexual interest by asking about my tits.

        You may be a fine Christian gentleman, but you don’t get to hang around with this crowd and then tsk-tsk when someone uses “foul language.”

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “I’ve only used some earthy language to describe some lovely, friendly, consensual activities after…”

        tell us, Eve, how many abortions have you had? 2? 3?

        how old would your daughter be today? 18?

        was that a lovely, friendly, CONSENSUAL, activity, killing your baby then vacuuming their body parts out of your cooch?

        did you ask your babies if that was okay with them?

        hmmm….?

        Like

      • Eve says:

        Greg,

        You’re shaking your head because you didn’t see the point. *I* don’t see my pussy and uterus as amazing, awe-inspiring and goddess-like. I am just a person. It’s DUDES who insist build up the female body in their minds into the ultimate goal – the thing to be fought for and fought over and guarded and controlled and sometimes worshipped. *I* don’t have these hang-ups. You guys do. I’m describing women’s sexual and reproductive capacity from your perspective.

        You guys even talk about this tendency in terms of “pedestalizing.” I agree that there is a tendency among men to imagine that flesh-and-blood women match their idealized fantasies of what they wish women are like. Then these men get all pissed off and bitter when, guess what, it turns out that we women are only human, just like them. And then they blame us and lash out at us for being human – and even construct whole systems of thought and write holy books and blogs about how much we suck.

        As for the abortion question, someone else brought up, good lord, haven’t you people heard of contraception? And if you aspire to be alphas with a cha-cha-cha lifestyle yourselves, aren’t you potentially just as complicit in abortion?

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “aren’t you potentially just as complicit in abortion?”

        a man who kills a fetus will likely be charged with first degree murder. for women, it’s a choice, like, “do I want pizza tonight, or Chinese food?”. “ooh let me stop off and get my nails done on the way home from the abortion clinic. hot tinder date tonight!”

        ultimate in double standards anyone?

        “…haven’t you people heard of contraception….”

        contraception is about the ONLY thing you should be commenting on, since the biological, familial and spiritual cul-de-sac you call a life indicates that you’re actually an expert at it.

        Like

      • whorefinder says:

        @Greg Eliot:

        She’s contradicting herself rape!

        Like

      • whorefinder says:

        @Lilith, not Evie:

        C’mon, you know and I know and we both know that you didn’t know the word “whinging” before.

        lmao. now now, stop trying to coverup your misstake, little bad speller. We all can see you made a spelling error and are desperately trying to deflect. Pretty badly. Just admit you made the error.

        Say thank you nicely and I will lube you up, open you gently to start and then plough your sweet little ass with my gigantic strap-on.

        I see your attraction to me is reaching a fever pitch, but your feminazi dogma has so clouded your judgment that you cannot act rationally upon your wet pussy at the thought of me. Sad!

        Living rent free in Lilith’s head and vagina rape!

        Like

      • uh says:

        REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

        Like

      • Plumpjack,

        Do you really think that it’s a put-down to accuse someone of being an expert in contraception? If you boys want to have all this sex you are dreaming about having, don’t you want to make sure that you aren’t either making babies or causing abortions right and left? What is your beef with birth control? Shouldn’t you think it’s the best thing ever?

        [CH: a distinction should be made when discussing these kinds of subjects between what is individually beneficial and what is societally detrimental. BC falls under this category.]

        Like

      • uh says:

        Anyone who emails that address is a tool. Don’t fucking do it.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “Plumpjack,
        Do you really think that it’s a put-down to accuse someone of being an expert in contraception?”

        i’m not taking you out on a date, so don’t even think about it.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Uh, THANK YOU. I screwed up. If the mod/blog owner could please remove my email address, I would be very grateful.

        Like

      • Eve says:

        TO UH – Thank you so much. I really appreciate it.

        TO CH – If there is any way you could remove my email address from my last comment, I would appreciate it with my apologies for the inconvenience.

        And to the rest of you boys, thanks for letting me play.

        Like

      • uh says:

        I was saying it for them, not you, but it seems you actually made a mistake. Relax. No one is going to bother you. Go swallow some Nyquil.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Eve says:

        Well, I thank you anyway, Uh. And no, I’m not too worried. I am a bit sick and addled from having spent too much time learning the basic gist of this site. So yes, nyquil and going back to work for me.

        Like

      • whorefinder says:

        lol. Now the little bad speller is engaging in more Freudian slips—giving out her email address to myself and the other men who get her desperately dusty little vagina wet for the first time in years.

        It’s quite telling how engaged she is in her sexual attraction towards the men here slapping her around.

        Perhaps she should find a Muslim husband who can do it daily?

        Bad Spelling Feminist rape!

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        You may be a fine Christian gentleman, but you don’t get to hang around with this crowd and then tsk-tsk when someone uses “foul language.”

        I hang around with this crowd and, as any here can tell you, throw out an expletive or tow on occasion myself.

        “Someone” using foul language isn’t the issue, toots. A woman using that language is the issue.

        You didn’t get the memo, apparently… here at the chateau, it’s a man’s world, and snarky women, especially of the hebe variety, aren’t equals and for the most part aren’t welcome.

        Yes, it’s a double-standard… sperm cheap, eggs dear.

        You don’t get to be “one of the boys” and maintain any female privilege.

        So stop acting like some truck stop whore who swallowed the Synathedral’s lie of equality.

        Like

    • Wrong Side of History says:

      Shut up cunt

      Liked by 1 person

    • Corvo says:

      whose little sister is playing with their phone

      Liked by 1 person

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Guys, I say it’s Strappy sock-puppeting and trying hard not to give herself away with only slight changes in expression…

      … but the gist and tone is ALL STRAPUNZEL. lzozlzozlozlzolzolzolozlozlozl

      Liked by 1 person

      • Eve says:

        Well, Greg, I think the blog owner can actually look and see that my comments do not come from the same source as the Spirit’s.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Well, Eve bubeleh, you nonetheless kvetch like our resident yenta…

        … not quite as insipid yet, but it seems to be heading that way.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Eve says:

        Greg, eh. You are right that this place isn’t that fun.

        Like

      • whorefinder says:

        @Lilith-not-Eve:

        I think the blog owner can actually look and see that my comments do not come from the same source as the Spirit

        Oh, so you’re using Tor over at Media Matters? Or is it a VPN? Or perhaps a combo–no wait, Media matters doesn’t have the money for both.

        media matters troll rape!

        Like

  165. Yes Trump could have done better in the debate, but look at these poll numbers!!!

    Many post debate polls show Trump as the winner!!!

    Time poll has 51 % Trump/ 49% Hillary…

    .CNBC has 63% Trump / 37% Hillary…

    ABC has Trump at 54% …

    Nate Silver of project 538 says if elections were held today Trump would win about 55% of the votes.

    The Strapon Within is crying in her pillow !!!

    Liked by 1 person

    • mendo says:

      You don’t remember Trump, but he remembers you
      T’was not so long ago, he had to debate two
      Tears on my pillow, pain in my heart
      Caused by Trump

      Like

  166. Putin says:

    This is what you need to keep an eye on. Forget the polls.

    http://www.pivit.io/politics/next-us-president/8415

    Interesting that they recently let Hinckley out of jail.

    Why doesn’t Trump just say “HILLARY’S GOAL IS WAR WITH RUSSIA” This forces her to defend herself.
    Call her out and put her on the defensive!!!!!!

    Come on Donald.

    Like

  167. chaoserrant says:

    There could be another explanation for why Trump did not focus enough on attacking her: who is his intended audience?. Maybe it was more important to insist on the bad job situation in Michigan, Pennsylvania, etc. If you think about it, none of us who are frustrated with his performance should be his target audience. Because we are already his voters which is the reason for our frustration since we want him to perform better. So, none of those who cheer for either of the two is important. These are the decided voters. So maybe the important audience is someone who did not give a shit about election, perhaps the unemployed voter from the Rust Belt, to give an example.

    Liked by 1 person

  168. Carlos Danger says:

    Let’s not forget Julain Assange either. He has evidence of murder for hire he has been hinting. That will sink the cunt for good. God is in charge of this event. Let him work his magic. He has a stellar sense ofhumor too. It will be a good. You listening Eve/Lilly?

    Like

  169. whorefinder says:

    I knew she was desperate when she started mentioning the following things:

    -special prosecutor
    -Saudi Arabia
    -Russia

    Those things are landmines for her, big time. Amygdalae highjacks. She didn’t want to bring them up. But Trump’s rise made her mention those by accident, opening her self up.

    Watching her tells rape!

    Like

    • mendo says:

      Mentioning Russia and all the claims against them made her seem more crazy than they make Trump out to be.

      She’s her own worst enemy rape.

      Liked by 1 person

      • whorefinder says:

        She was projecting, classic Lefty fail. Vox is right about that.

        I’m of the opinion Trump saw that Hillary was projecting and, instead of pouncing, let her keep going. He saw that if he pounced, she’d realize what she was doing and stop projecting. He let her spin out all her projections and thus allowed us (the morning-after crew) to bring it up to others, e.g. Hey, Hillary brought up a special prosecutor. Shouldn’t she have one on her case?

        Trump’s persuasion is also powerful after the fact. You forget the nitty gritty but remember the tone and big phrases. He plants time-bombs that only go off in your memory later. Scott Adams has pointed this out in regards to his talk about black problems and the raghead speech at the DNC.

        Like

      • whorefinder says:

        other e.g.’s

        “Hillary was screaming about transparency. What about her emails and her donations?”

        “Hillary was screaming about our allies. What about our allies in the mideast who we abandoned?”

        Time bombs. Projection.

        Like

  170. Wrong Side of History says:

    Trump was debating two people.

    Like

  171. stevetirone says:

    If I could give Trump advice for the next debate (maybe I am!) it would be, “Don’t get caught flat-footed defending yourself. OFFENSE OFFENSE OFFENSE. Own the frame. Go after the cunt like you’re filleting a fishwife.”

    ^^^ This. His defensive posture drove me insane. Where’s the AMOGing?

    Like

  172. Captain Obvious says:

    NY Post serving up post-debate miscegenation ads for “First Tennessee” bank…

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      The Frankfurt School is pushing the miscegenation angle relentlessly in an effort to unbreed the huWhyte raced out of existence; the supreme irony is that this ad ran over a story about an all-huWhyte bar in Pennsylvania which agreed unanimously that The Donald had won the debate…

      Liked by 1 person

  173. Carlos Danger says:

    This is what your demon spawn bitch did Eve. Are you happy now?

    Liked by 1 person

  174. Rick Derris says:

    Remember: you are all RAAACIS according to Zack Beauchamp, resident Pajama Boy postmodern anuseater at “Vox” (not Vox Day, the Ezra Vox):

    http://www.vox.com/2016/9/19/12933072/far-right-white-riot-trump-brexit

    Not a single mention of Rotherham, 9/11, the Tube bombings, etc. Yup, it’s all the fault of white people. It

    Like

  175. Sniffly McSociopath tells the media that his microphone was defective. He wonders if that was all on purpose.

    This is the guy you want representing you to the world. A guy who invents fake problems to bitch about because he couldn’t control the goddamned words that he was putting into the microphone. That’s not alpha. That’s pathetic.

    Clinton was the one who showed amused mastery. That’s undeniable. He was the bull, roaring and blathering and defensive. He couldn’t even give a straight answer to a question on the most important night of his life.

    WashPost sums it up nicely: Trump’s performance was the rhetorical equivalent of hurling garbage on the lawn. A question about x would lead to mentions of y, z and whatever else came to mind.

    He fucked up answers to questions that he KNEW were coming–birther, taxes, etc. Drunk Uncle was unprepared. You don’t bring a Cheeto to a knife fight.

    Like

    • you talk like a fag

      Liked by 1 person

    • whorefinder says:

      Sniffly McSociopath

      it’s so cute how obvious the faggot gamma within is falling in love with Herr Trumpenreich. He’s now literally copying Trump’s moves to stick a quippy label on people…..

      except the faggot gamma within, like he always does in life, fails even at this, his mimickry of the next commander-in-chief.

      Herr Trumpenreich living rent free in Faggot Gamma within’s head rape!

      Like

      • mendo says:

        She was copying CH’s style before she became smitten with GL.

        And remember, she’s not carrying water for thecunt or has any skin in this game. But the pay must be good, amirite?

        Liked by 1 person

  176. From Business Insider

    1. Prediction markets moved toward Clinton during the debate. PredictWise, which aggregates odds from betting markets and bookmakers, showed her odds of winning the presidency rising from 69% before the debate to 73% after. The Mexican peso also strengthened 2% against the dollar during the debate, and as Justin Wolfers notes for The New York Times, the peso-dollar exchange rate has become something of a market proxy for the election outcome.

    2. TV news focus groups said Clinton clearly won. The CBS undecided voter focus group, run by Frank Luntz, gave it to her by a margin of 16 to six; CNN’s gave it to her by 18 to two.

    3. Trump’s own surrogates won’t argue forcefully that he won. The rules of this are usually simple: If you’re a surrogate, you go into the spin room after the debate and say your candidate killed it. Clinton’s supporters are following the usual script. But lots of Trump supporters can’t even bring themselves to do that. Laura Ingraham said on Fox News that Trump left a lot of material on the table and complained about Lester Holt’s topic choices. Even Corey Lewandowski, Trump’s former campaign manager who now works for CNN, would only say Trump won the first half of the debate.

    4. One focus group participant said something telling. A CNN panelist who gave the win to Clinton noted, approvingly, that she “took control of the situation.” This is true: She projected confidence and brought up topics that were difficult for Trump, while Trump failed to raise many of his strengths and her weaknesses. Trump spent 25 words on Rosie O’Donnell, yet said nothing about the wall, the Clinton Foundation, or Clinton’s comment about “deplorables.”

    5. Trump skipped a post-debate victory party he was supposed to attend and went straight home. Trump said he enjoyed the debate but didn’t seem too eager celebrate. Maybe he was sad, or was feeling low-energy, or lacked the stamina to greet his supporters.

    Like

    • whorefinder says:

      note how the faggot gamma within offers zero links to any of his supposed “facts.” that’s how you know media matters is slipping—-they can’t even bother to make up fake reports and fake polls to put into their posts.

      Faggot Gamma within is David Brock’s bitch rape!

      Like

    • Wrong Side of History says:

      It’s coming, dweeb

      Liked by 1 person

    • Greg Eliot says:

      The fact that Trump didn’t outright destroy Clinton on the issues, and let the moderator ask bullshit questions without challenge, means she won by default.

      And she didn’t look lacking in stamina or unhealthy, so there’s that.

      I mean, how simple is it to say “We’ll talk about bankruptcy laws and business operation now for a moment… but then let’s talk about pay-for-play in the political and business arenas and how that related to so-called charitable Foundations as well… deal?”

      The runner stumbled, no doubt… I can admit that.

      But the other side neener-neenering him has to admit that questions about birther nonsense and a few of his businesses going bankrupt are such picayune and old news issues that they had no business being brought up in an allegedly serious and impartially (ha!) moderated debate.

      One can only hope the big issues that face this nation… issues which can only shine a deadly light on the Clinton record and character… are being saved for the future debates…

      … and that The Donald lives up to the savvy alpha reputation that has carried him thus far.

      Perhaps he was playing possum a bit, to seem “less scary” or to lull the Clinton camp into overconfidence, I don’t know…

      … but I’m hoping reports of the imminent crown that will be placed on his head have not been greatly exaggerated… today, they certainly look prematurely over-optimistic.

      Like

      • The Spirit Within says:

        The birther question was legitimate. Sniffly McSociopath spent seven years attacking the citizenship of our elected president — and he knew that he was lying all along. The moderator had every right to ask him why he lied for so long in public. (Answer: Because he’s a sociopath.) And there are about 36 million black American voters, plus Muslim voters, who really wanted to hear him answer for that.

        Like

      • whorefinder says:

        @The Faggot-Gamma Within:

        The birther question was legitimate.

        lol. Defending Hillary’s conspiracy theory. Nope, not a media matters-paid-shill at all!

        a sociopath

        projection.

        about 36 million black American voters, plus Muslim voters

        And I’ll bet you wish they would all would gang bang you, don’t you?

        Faggot Gamma within rape!

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Bullshit.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        36 million black voters, heh… you mean the 95% bloc that’s going to vote Dem even if they ran Satan himself on the ticket really cared about some mean words spoken years ago that had no effect upon getting the negro elected to two terms?

        I doubt if 1% of your precious “black vote” even knew the debate was on… though I’m sure they new every play and score from the football game… or maybe not even that.

        And you have the gall to talk about a “muslim vote”? What percentage of the electorate doe THEY make-up, that the MSM and the vaunted moderator have to kowtow on old-news questions?

        You can’t be serious… if this mentality of yours is truly representative of the type of people who now hold sway in the country, then America doesn’t even have the two or three generations left that I optimistically give her.

        (((shakin’ it)))

        Liked by 1 person

      • carlos danger says:

        His numbers are up in the polls. He won. He just didn’t win as gloriously as we wanted him to.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Publius says:

      Like

  177. GB says:

    If voters were on the same drugs as Secretary Cunton was last night they’d all be happy enough not care who won. Heck with her medical records, Bernie supporters and googles just want last nights prescription list. How long til the shitlibs start writing articles describing their coping prescriptions? Spirit Enema Within you need something stronger then spirits.

    Like

  178. PA says:

    These debates are stuck on 1992 anachronisms about The Economy, which convince nobody, and on the 1980s-era hand-wringing about Inner Cities and its bestial African-Americans.

    There is an existential abyss on everyone’s mind. Trump’s task, during the next debates or in a venue deemed more effective as message force-multiplier, is to connect with those anxieties.

    Like

  179. Wrong Side of History says:

    Trump made the mistake of treating this like a real debate rather than a chance to hammer four decades of Clinton misconduct. She needed to squirm in front of millions.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      The only explanation, which has been offered by several here, is that he’s playing a game of possum to lull the Synathedral into overconfidence… and building a bit of comfort with the nervous nellies still sitting on the fence… then saving the kill-shots for subsequent debates which will be fresher in the memory of the public.

      I hope they’re right.

      Like

  180. bear says:

    I think the Don is allowing her to remain a viable candidate until the final debate. If he used the linguistic kill shots in the first debate – it would show the core supporters of the Demonrat party that there is no hope for her and must be replaced immediately while there is still time. By the final debate this window of opportunity will have closed whereupon the lethal shivs will be unleashed.
    Trump has always been known to play a very strategic long game.

    Like

    • Sniffly McSociopath has the attention span of a toddler with a gallon of ice cream. A strategic long game to him means next Tuesday.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Strapunzel, you’ve been chided before about inane, inapt, and inept attempts at neener-neeners.

        And you keep telling on yourself that you’re just another millennial dweeb or yenta teen weaned on pap culture and snark comedy of the last two generations.

        There’s no way… and I mean NO FUCKING WAY… a MAN in his thirties comes up with something like Sniffly McSociopath.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Liked by 1 person

      • mendo says:

        She’s so full of anger. It’s sad.

        Liked by 1 person

      • whorefinder says:

        A strategic long game to him means next Tuesday.

        Forty years to build a ten Billion dollar company.

        Multi-year building projects.

        An insurgent campaign that has knocked out sixteen primary opponents and have overtaken Hillary in a two year attack–and for whom he’s planned for since 2012.

        Faggot-Gamma Within is now officially delusional and lying rape!

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      I think the Don is allowing her to remain a viable candidate until the final debate. If he used the linguistic kill shots in the first debate – it would show the core supporters of the Demonrat party that there is no hope for her and must be replaced immediately while there is still time.

      That’s a fair point… and I hope it’s more than wishful thinking.

      The more one thinks about it, Trump couldn’t POSSIBLY have fucked up that bad last night by accident…

      … and the lesson from his “softening on immigration” and then doubling-down proves he can rope-a-dope with the best of ’em.

      Liked by 1 person

  181. WHY SNIFFLY MCSOCIOPATH SPEAKS INCOHERENTLY

    Geoffrey Pullum, a linguist at University of Edinburgh, argues that there’s more going on than just a conversational, I’ll-let-you-fill-in-the-gaps-style. Trump’s unorganized sentences and short snippets might suggest something about how his mind works. “His speech suggests a man with scattered thoughts, a short span of attention, and a lack of intellectual discipline and analytical skills,” Pullum says.

    More sophisticated thinkers and speakers (including many past presidents), Pullum argues, are able to use “hypotaxis — that is, embedding of clauses within clauses.” Trump can’t seem to do that.

    Pullum explains further: “When you say something like ‘While Congress shows no interest in doing X, I feel that the American people believe it is essential,’ the clause ‘it is essential’ is inside the clause ‘the American people believe it is essential’ which is inside the clause ‘I feel that the American people believe it is essential,’ and so on. You get no such organized thoughts from Trump. It’s bursts of noun phrases, self-interruptions, sudden departures from the theme, flashes of memory, odd side remark. It’s the disordered language of a person with a concentration problem.”

    Read that last sentence again, and think about his performance in last night’s debate.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      I’m surprised the buildings he’s erected aren’t falling down around his ears.

      Strappy, you can keep printing all the self-congratulatory gobblegook of the outhouse psychologists and Synathedral media from now until election day…

      … all you’re doing is telling on yourself.

      Enjoy this little moment of neener-neener in the sun, you sniveling pismire.

      Trump or no Trump, this country is finished, and you and your ilk are going down with it.

      Liked by 1 person

    • whorefinder says:

      oh Faggot-Gamma Within, I can see him spanking his keyboard and furiously screaming at the screen with every post. “STOP LOVING TRUMP, MR. SOROS DOESN’T LIKE HIM, I WILL LIE UNTIL YOU AGREE WITH ME MOMMMY!”

      Faggot-Gamma Within is losing it rape!

      Like

    • Scanman says:

      From my perspective, Hillary clearly won last night. Trump was scattered and reactive, she was laser focused and in control for 80% of the debate. Plus, she did it all without collapsing or even coughing once. A clutch performance from her when she needed it most.

      However, the truth is that it won’t be enough. All the devastating points DJT left on the table last night? They’re still there. They won’t go away and she will be made to face the music over the course of the remaining debates. Add an October surprise from our man Assange and it’s all over but the crying.

      Bottom line: DJT can and likely will improve a lot from this point while Hillary has nowhere to go but down.

      I see DJT getting the highest percentage of the black vote that a republican candidate has ever received. Black folks hate this phony rich cunt almost as much as white red staters. That’s going to make a difference in Michigan and Pennsylvania and Ohio.

      I’m optimistic.

      Like

      • The Spirit Within says:

        DJT can and likely will improve a lot from this point while Hillary has nowhere to go but down

        Red rover, red rover, send an analyst on over. Sniffles McSociopath’s support is very firm but unchanging. He’s never broken through 40%, and nobody wins the presidency with less than 40%. HRC’s support has drifted from 42% to 50%, which indicates a lot of general floating soft support. She has nowhere to go but UP after last night’s excellent performance. Sniffles McSociopath had to make a play to those waffling in the middle, and he failed in both manner and message.

        Black folks hate this phony rich cunt almost as much as white red staters.

        Black folks are the key to her successful bid. They loved Bill and they love Hill. Come on back to reality. I’ll leave the lights on for ya.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Strappy, I thought you lived and breathed polls… all the ones I’ve seen lately have Trump well-above 40%, and many have him beating Clinton, even after last night’s tepid performance.

        Or are you still salivating over 538 from several months ago?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Hello… hello… Strappy?

        Is this mike on?

        Strappy?

        Strappy?

        Bueller?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Scanman says:

        Black folks are indeed the key to her bid. The problem is that if they don’t turn out in similar numbers to vote for her as they did to vote for the purple-lipped, limp wristed, tranny humper, she loses. Further, she needs more than 90+% of the black vote to win. Not happening in this world.

        Black folks did indeed love Bill Clinton. But that was 20 years ago and they’re still no better off.

        They weren’t too crazy about the Cunt even 20 years ago. Now she’s just a wrinkled, phony, corrupt, rich white lady who looks at them like they OWE her their votes.

        Do blacks love Trump? No way but a significant minority of liberal -wise blacks who are tired of getting fucked over by SWPL scum in $15,000 suits will vote for him. More than enough to deprive Hilllary of victory.

        That is indeed my analysis. We shall see who turns out to be right. In the event that I’m wrong, I’ll be back to admit it. I’m sure you’ll do the same.

        Like

      • vfm#7634 says:

        From my perspective, Hillary clearly won last night. Trump was scattered and reactive, she was laser focused and in control for 80% of the debate.

        Uh huh. Scanman, I don’t understand what you’re talking about it. “Laser focused” and yet was completely unable to explain how she would improve the economy for the American people. Everything was, “we need more globalism because it will make things better for us, at some indeterminate time in the future.” Trump won on that front, even if imperfectly.

        Like

    • carlos danger says:

      So you have confirmation bias in favor of good talkers versus people of action. Only a woman would care.

      Liked by 1 person

    • uh says:

      I have noticed his inability to use hypotaxis. As a language purist it makes me cringe. The deponent or dependent clause – we don’t say “embedded” – is a dying art. Mr Pullum there has lost his grasp of subjunctives, by the way.

      Like

      • The Spirit Within says:

        It’s the first thing I noticed about Sniffles’ speeches. Not the bombast, but the syntax. Dependent clauses are a sign of complex thought, and he uses none of them.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I’ve known quite a few men in my time whose lack of eloquence and seeming problems with concentration on discussion did, in fact, mask a profundity of thought.

        The simple maxim “actions speak louder than words” still applies when the rubber meets the road… although the ‘Murrican public has been degraded and feminized enough to dwell on words over deeds.

        Buildings don’t spring up from the ground, especially in the greatest city in the world, from mere clever use of syntax.

        Like

      • uh says:

        a) Everyone has met that intuitively genius guy who can’t make words right
        b) Trump is not an architect – he relies on “guys, really smart guys, the best”
        c) It don’t matta

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “I’ve known quite a few men in my time whose lack of eloquence and seeming problems with concentration on discussion did, in fact, mask a profundity of thought.”

        yes. the smarter man knows what he DOESN’T know, what he ISN’T good at, and what he SHOULDN’T waste his time on. lower IQ folks think they have ALL the answers, ALL the time, and want to get ALL the credit for everything…until the consequences of their fuckups come pouring in. then it’s suddenly everyone else’s turn to get the credit.

        like Hilary, TSW is too dumb to know what she doesn’t know, and the rest of us have to suffer through her blundering idiocy as she tries to convince smarter men to rethink ideas that they sorted out thoroughly in second grade

        Like

    • savantissimo says:

      Yeah, I’m sure the googles are gonig to be all like: “yah, I wuz gonna vote for the bling-bling man, but he ain’t got no high-po-taxies like de white bitch do. De communitay needs its taxis, we ain’t harly got no cars.”

      Like

      • uh says:

        Rofl
        In my Reich, we’d raise them that way

        Like

      • “In my Reich, we’d raise them that way”

        saruh bear, when I find even one thing you’ve said or claim to have done, which would suggest your pill-popping, nagger-screwing ass could stand to breathe in a republic “right-wing” enough to elect Nelson Rockefeller in 1964, I will make SURE to add it to your dossier.

        But since everyone at heartiste is an anti-Semitic monster whowanstakillsixgozilluhnjews, by all means, keep making those reassuring “Nazi” noises. We know it’s for a (((good cause))).

        Like

    • bear says:

      For the love of all that is good – just shut the fuck up. The more you comment the more you show how utterly stupid and ignorant you are.

      Let me just say this: I know – very personally – a high ranking individual in politics. They have had private dinners a number of times with DT. This individual shared with me that – in private settings – DT is very well read, articulate and able to talk at great depth on many subjects. When this individual asked DT why his public persona is so different than his private one – DT responded with ” its the only way to reach and connect with the people”. Mass immigration since 1965 and “publik skool” have dumbed the average voter down so much – you have to talk ( and even act) like a fifth grader to be listened to these days.

      You are a classic gamma who believes his verbal gas bagging is profound intelligence. Truthfully – you are a subpar mid wit. You are not as smart as you think you are

      Like

  182. irishsavant says:

    I regret to say that were I to have stumbled onto this debate without knowing anything about either candidate I’d have thought that Beaste was more Presidential.

    Like

    • plumpjack says:

      the Donald had much whiter teeth and the best eyebrows by far. that’s all that really matters.

      seriously though, DT plays the long game. it’s likely he and his team consciously decided not to pummel her last night in order to reduce the chance of alienating women voters. it’s a fine line to walk. the woman card is front and center, even if no one is saying it outright.

      his best angle is strong man bone crusher and if he played that now he’d freak people out. just a little taste about the email server. that was enough. the rest of the night he was just killing time, bobbing and weaving. plenty more bone crushing shivs to come. and if he makes it to oval office we’ll be treated to that weekly. stay tuned.

      Like

      • Scanman says:

        What more can they throw at him? Nothing. Her wad hath done been shot.

        Conversely, Trump has one hell of a lot of dry powder to explode. The Clinton Foundation alone is a freaking neutron bomb.

        Again, I’m optimistic.

        Like

  183. GB says:

    Sure he is just another barely functioning billionaire. Just like your boss, Soros. How come no one is talking about the drugs auntie amphetamine was on? She was high as a kite, you were so big on the drunk uncle bit except Trump don’t drink, are you are OK with auntie amphetamine?

    Liked by 1 person

  184. Wrong Side of History says:

    Like

  185. Popcorn Out says:

    Fucks sake, why do you people always take the bait and reply when TSW comes around?

    Literally everyone here knows his sole purpose is to come here and derail discussion and you fall for it every single time. It’s the Achilles heel of an otherwise sharp group of people.

    If we could actually go a week without a single person acknowledging any of his posts he’d lose his job and probably put a gun in his mouth. Problem solved.

    Liked by 1 person

    • mendo says:

      This has been brought up before and the reasons for it were solid.

      Main point being she won’t stop, no matter what.

      And besides, witnessing her make a fool of herself and getting taken down each and every time is classic!

      Like

    • plumpjack says:

      this angle has been tried before. you get used to it. part of the diverse ecosystem here. it’s more for sport and a creative writing outlet than anything. also gives the “thousands of lurkers” a slow-motion, high res image of the destruction that happens when truth and anti-truth collide.

      TSW is like the toenail fungus that never quite goes away, never quite causes a big problem, but every one in awhile requires a bit of treatment when things get a bit too moist.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        That toenail fungus analogy is as good a way to put it as any.

        Of course, Strapunzel imagines herself to be some sort of malignant cancer, eating away at the very bone of our paticular body politic. lzolaozlzlzozlozlozl

        Like

    • Wrong Side of History says:

      Because sadism.

      Like

    • GB says:

      I see your point. On the other hand ignoring lefty bullshit for a couple of decades hasn’t worked out so well. Plus it is practice for us and an example for others. Just think if everyone called out lefty bullshit every time they came across it. That is where we need to go. So pile on the Barren Within.

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      If we could actually go a week without a single person acknowledging any of his posts he’d lose his job and probably put a gun in his mouth. Problem solved.

      I’d like to see the reverse Dynamic Silence tried on her as well, leastwise for awhile.

      But then we have to put up with her interminable claims of victory by default, which are only slightly less annoying.

      Besides, like others have said, slapping ol’ Strappy around is good exercise, much like when killer whales throw around a seal for awhile before devouring it.

      Like

    • Popcorn Out says:

      It’s like half a dozen businessmen beating up a schizophrenic homeless man on the way home. It’s pointless, it’s beneath them and they have more important things to be doing.

      Like

      • uh says:

        That’s a pretty good analogy. I wonder if businessmen would dig the cock swastika.

        But no, seriously. They respond to TSW for the same reason they call everyone who disagrees a Jew: they’re not that deep, and this is low investment chatter.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        more like the business man who finally resorts to beating up the persistent homeless guy who sleeps on his doorstep and pisses and craps on his front door, despite repeated applications of generosity, patience and admonishments.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        uh, be honest… when shills make noises of agitprop, THAT’S when they suspected of being (((tribal))) themselves, or useful stooges thereof, both White and nonwhite.

        And in my mind, the (((tribalists))) at least have an excuse to shill for their side… what’s the excuse of the allegedly WHITE useful stooges who carry water for Team AntiWhite?

        Liked by 1 person

      • uh says:

        Ich bin immer ehrlich. This is what sends Lucius into fits of moral righteousness, after all: he can’t understand a guy who isn’t afraid of his own problems.

        It’s just low-investment chatter. We don’t know each other, so why not just write people off as yids? It’s like this on every pro-white forum known to man.

        The thing is, although it is low-investment, it is still investment: and Jews don’t invest this way. Only self-appointed white moral censors do. I mean sure, you have ADL types who do their homework, but they’re not paid to put on a show, and very few people are capable of that order of dissimulation. You know them when they appear. There was a guy called Darryl who used to dog Hunter Wallace for YEARS. Darryl Bessarab, lol. I guess he was half Jewish or something. This kid would pull off some impressive trolling then unmask himself for the kicks. He sent old Brad into a tailspin of identity crisis, forums were hacked, photos were posted, and he emerged from the fire as Hunter Wallace, about a hundred pounds lighter.

        Anyway, I gotta run. Let’s hit 600 comments and put the TRS goyim to shame.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Du bist immer ehrlich, ausser, wenn Sie spricht wie gegend ALLE weissen Frauen, du Arsch mit Ohren.

        Like

      • uh says:

        Das ist ganz Ansichtssache.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        No its not, she keeps coming back for more so we use her to make a point.

        Like

      • “They respond to TSW for the same reason they call everyone who disagrees a Jew: they’re not that deep, and this is low investment chatter.”

        You wouldn’t HAVE to be a Jew, saruh bear, in order to be shallow and low-investment.

        But God knows it helps

        Like

      • “This is what sends Lucius into fits of moral righteousness, after all: he can’t understand a guy who isn’t afraid of his own problems. ”

        saruh you stupid shit, you’re so lowbrow and unfit you can’t even see the sick cosmic joke God played upon you, creating a pill addict who talks about deponent verbs.

        You could be “morally” pure and you’d be hateful for being so stupid– truly, the most risible compound of community college PolySci/SocPsych/Linguistics fucktardery imaginable! It’s like a Pabst Blue Ribbon hipster as portrayed by Huysmans.

        And speaking of “unmasking yourself for the kicks”, I AM impressed by the chutzpah with which you dropped your nagger-screwing smutfest into the punchbowl, apropos of nothing, then declined to defend yourself in the subsequent OP in which CH called you out– before returning to your “commenting career”, sans qualification.

        Your psychotic LARPing and threats of violence will make additional fun re-reading too, for all and sundry! After all saruh bear, you aren’t “afraid of your own problems”.

        In fact, I suspect you traveled to South Asia to “confront” some of them– that is, if you are the stupid “male” “half-Italian” “nihilist” you claim to be.

        It’s much happier for you to be a Jewess. “For the children”, if for nobody else.

        Oh and saruh: I love music. You fuck n*ggers. I don’t see the equivalence.

        But then, neither logic nor morality are in your skill set.

        Like

      • uh says:

        Huysmans. I knew you were a real dilettante. Your style is textbook over-literary. Anyone who can make it through Là-bas has no sense for good books. Ashamed to have you for a stalker.

        Like

      • uh says:

        Real people read Leconte de Lisle, btw. This will make you sound more authentic if you ever happen to encounter someone else who actually knows literature, as against merely posing as such, like you. You’re welcome.

        Like

    • Haven M. says:

      this is cray to me because if there’s one thing lefties love to do is stuff online polls. So if crazy hillary cultists couldn’t outstuff teh deplorables…wow.

      I thought trump should’ve dropped all the verbal kill shots on her but I guess that’s a judgement thing.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Yes, this is crazy indeed… if it were a SANE world.

      But let’s face it… for most folks, their already-favorite candidate could take a dump on stage and they’d still feel their man (or almost man) won.

      Like

    • Haven M. says:

      he said that?

      Just goes to show, some people with more of a sales…story telling background are less about nerdy debate prep and about the feels of the thing.

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Well, this is becoming bizarro world, unless the fat agitprop shill was trying to be snarky.

      Then again, I’ve often said that the American people, from high to low, have been fed short-attention span snark, gratuitous sex and violence, and no-respect-for-anything cultural shite for so long, it’s no wonder that nothing really matters anymore as far as “popular opinion” goes.

      Like

  186. Putin says:

    When Lester asked Donald if he would accept the results of the election it was just another set up. Donald should of said NO. They don’t want any trouble when he gets “Bernied” The fix is in people it just will take a while to figure it out. And please don’t bring up crazy conspiracy theories that everything will be fair and democratic. This is not Russia. Again if you don’t understand just go to the DNC and see what happened with their nomination process.

    Took me one sleepless night. They have this covered on multiple fronts.

    I am rarely wrong. In fact I do not recall ever being wrong on this forum which scares the hell out of me.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      You weren’t always right… but you wuz never wrong. lzozlozlo

      I didn’t watch the debate, but did the ni66er actually ask “accept the results”?

      I mean, that’s sort of an odd way of putting it… one would think “support the new President” would be a more pertinent question.

      What’s the Donald supposed to say? “Accept it? No, I’m going to mobilize my UFO battalions from their underground bunkers in Antarctica and make War Of The Worlds look like a mere n1gger chimpout?”

      or

      “Yes, I’ll accept the results, but will go into my private office and chew the carpet.”

      Did Hillary get asked the same question?

      (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      Like

      • The Spirit Within says:

        You didn’t pay attention AGAIN, Greg Eliot, but that question was asked of both candidates. It was the last one of the night.

        Try WATCHING the debate before chiming in, there’s a good boy.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        What was Hillary’s answer, yenta?

        Try addressing the actual point, shill… what is anyone expected to say in answer to “accept” the election?

        “No, like the negroes of late, I’m going to go out into the streets and burn down my own house?”

        And stop trying to sound like a condescending schoolmarm… at least TRY to keep up any thin semblance of being a 6′ 2″ ladykiller. lzozlzolzolzolzolzo

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        He did but he can always change his mind. I’m sure there was an implied caveat that only if the election were fair.

        Like

      • Putin says:

        “HOLT: Mr. Trump, very quickly, same question. Will you accept the outcome as the will of the voters?”

        “HOLT: Will you accept the outcome of the election?”

        This was a set up question. Both of these questions were for Trump as they wanted to get him on the record. Of course Hillary was asked also as it makes it more effective.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        If by saying “accept”, the connotation was that there would be no challenge of voting fraud and such, then of course, the assumption has to be that there was no obvious rigging going on.

        Which again, is a strange way to couch that question… as if the Synathedral was dipping a toe in the waters to see how many exhumed voters they could get away with?

        I still say an honest question would have been more along the lines of “would you support the new President” rather than :”accept the results”.

        If the intention was to see how he felt about possible rigging, they should have just come out and asked it that way.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        If they already know they’re going to cook the books on election night, a la the ol’ Cook County Conga, then I guess it’s immaterial to ask the Dem candidate if they’re going to “accept the results”, amirite? lzozlozlozlo

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        The more one thinks about it, that whole “would you accept the results” question is just another glaring example of bullshit, means-nothing, only purpose is to try to get a “gotcha!” response.

        Where were all the actual important issue questions that should have been asked, given the relatively short amount of time and purported importance of our “political process”?

        This whole debate thing has been a sham for awhile now, with the jackal press hoping only, not for the best of the best to rise to the top and steer the ship of state on proper course, rather: merely to get some sound-bytes and neener-neener pop culture zingers.

        Fuck this ghey planet. Can’t (((shake mah haid))) enough.

        Like

    • Enfant Terrible says:

      This was an odd question to ask. Maybe it was done to set him up, in case he answered Maybe, or NO, as some sort of anti-Democratic wanna be tyrant, or potential social agitator.

      My first thought was that he should’ve said no, but maybe its more prudent to say Yes for now.

      Like

      • Putin says:

        Enfant, the right answer would be……

        “The American people witnessed the corrupt rigging of the Democratic nomination process which stole the nomination for Bernie Sanders. This has been brushed under the rug and has undermined our democratic process. The Bernie people were clearly disenfranchised and rightfully upset. I want to bring the democratic process back to America but to do this we must stop the corruption of people like Hillary Clinton and Debbie Wasserman. So NO of course I would not accept results which would show Hillary wining as the evidence has already shown they would be rigged. Just ask the Bernie people about this.”

        That is how you put everything into your frame!!!!!!!!!

        Like

      • Enfant Terrible says:

        That would have been a great answer.

        Two thumbs for you!!!

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Yeah, more’s the pity… very puzzling that he didn’t at least hit ONE softball into the stands.

        I understand playing rope-a-dope a bit, but you gotta at least show a stiff jab once in awhile to keep the opponent honest.

        Like

  187. GB says:

    That was a weird question and suggests lots of monkeying planned. For Trump to win it has to be a ridiculous landslide. Same as primaries you are going to see district results that are absolutely not possible based on the residents in that district. We can always show our political discontent the BLM way. I’d love to see a good white riot.

    Like

  188. From Politico:

    Hillary Clinton plays chess. Donald Trump plays craps. Chess isn’t for everyone. It takes a long time. It’s complicated. The chess team has a tendency to get beat up. Craps is fun. It’s thrilling. Maybe you win big. Maybe you lose. But in the moment, what a show.

    Yup. He lost big.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Can you at least try to give a semblance of fair?

      He may have lost, but what I’m seeing now in the press and polls, he absolutely did NOT lose “big”… except in the wishful thinking of you and your ilk.

      And to refresh your memory, all those neener-neeners of the past few months that were supposed to sink Trump didn’t have the effect you crowed about and hoped for… and neither will this first debate.

      Be honest, if you would kvetch about credibility, reason, commonsense, and “human decency”… sheesh, I shouldn’t have to explain this to a person of good will.

      (There’s that White altruism naivete’ of mine again… shame on me for thinking this appeal means anything to the Strapons of the world).

      (((shakin’ mah haid… over myself)))

      Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      Politico. LOL. They don’t even understand chess there.

      Liked by 1 person

    • whorefinder says:

      lmao. the correct metaphor is:

      Hillary plays blackjack. She tries to count cards, and fails. She tries to get a team together to count cards, and they fail. She tries to bring in devices to count cards for her, and fails.

      She’s behind $100,000 to the casino, but she still thinks she’ll come out ahead. Because it’s “her time.”

      Trump owns the casino.

      Card Counter rape!

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Not THAT’S funny.

        Reminds me of the old gag when the Yankees would go through a dynasty period.

        The Yankee haters would grouse:

        “Rooting for the Yankees is like going to a casino and rooting for the house”.

        The correct response:

        “No, rooting for the Yankees is like being the house.”

        Liked by 1 person

    • vfm#7634 says:

      It’s not uncommon for Politico to have things back-assward.

      Trump is playing chess, and Hillary (plus Lester) the craps. (In two senses of the word.)

      Like

    • Ponce du Lion says:

      It isn’t rhetoric chess?? It isn’t game strategy?? If you think so you have already lost. Think about uncle adolf, think about CH.

      Like

  189. Carlos Danger says:

    Like

  190. Putin says:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/26/the-first-trump-clinton-presidential-debate-transcript-annotated/

    The transcript. Don’t read this unless you want to get depressed. Hillary somehow made Donald look like he wants to start another war. If it wasn’t so sad it would be funny. Donald was helpless.

    “The other day, I saw Donald saying that there were some Iranian sailors on a ship in the waters off of Iran, and they were taunting American sailors who were on a nearby ship. He said, you know, if they taunted our sailors, I’d blow them out of the water and start another war. That’s not good judgment.

    TRUMP: That would not start a war.

    CLINTON: That is not the right temperament to be commander-in- chief, to be taunted. And the worst part…

    TRUMP: No, they were taunting us”

    Donald go F-ING watch Putin speak and get control of yourself..

    Like

  191. Putin says:

    “CLINTON: The other day, I saw Donald saying that there were some Iranian sailors on a ship in the waters off of Iran, and they were taunting American sailors who were on a nearby ship. He said, you know, if they taunted our sailors, I’d blow them out of the water and start another war. That’s not good judgment.

    TRUMP: That would not start a war.

    CLINTON: That is not the right temperament to be commander-in- chief, to be taunted. And the worst part…

    TRUMP: No, they were taunting us”

    Ignore her shit tests and don’t fall into her frame. Pound her on her wars and women and children dying. Over and over. Stop falling for her shit tests.

    Like

  192. I’ve got nothing to add…there were plenty of nuclear shivs, or close to nuclear shivs, Trump could of deployed but, sheesh, he’s not a professional bull shitter like careerist politicians lackeys of the TPTB, he was too busy building stuff and actually creating stuff. Maybe the advice of Giuliani is right, don’t participate when moderators rig the game with bias. 3 to 4 minutes of elevator pitch around a topic, then win themes, then discriminators that nail the bitch.
    Come on WikiLeaks, release the nuclear shiv’s….burn the bitch down to the ground.

    Like

  193. Mario says:

    I woke up here in the Eastern Europe only to see headlines
    No difference worldwide or our local media, what a magic, all were the same.
    Trump lost debate !
    Hillary brilliant, trump loses deabte !
    My shitl1b friends working in the media swarm fb newsfeed with essays how only one candidate should be allowed to debate :DD

    LMAO
    In the moment, I knew what was up and that sh1tlord had her served.

    But media has to tell everone, the TRUTH !!! capslock, exclamation marks, repeat that Trump lost at least thrice again.
    Next up, headlines :
    TRUMP LOST! TRUMP LOST! LOST LOST!!!!!

    Like

  194. Carlos Danger says:

    Like

  195. Putin says:

    Enfant, the right answer would be(typos fixed)……

    “The American people witnessed the corrupt rigging of the Democratic nomination process which stole the nomination from Bernie Sanders. This has been brushed under the rug and has undermined our democratic process. The Bernie people were clearly disenfranchised and rightfully upset. I want to bring the democratic process back to America but to do this we must stop the corruption of people like Hillary Clinton and Debbie Wasserman. So NO, of course I would not accept results which would show Hillary winning as the evidence has already shown it would be rigged. Just ask the Bernie people about this.”

    That is how you put everything into your frame!!!!!!!!!

    Like

  196. Enfant Terrible says:

    And how about the choice of color for Hillary Clinton’s suit?

    Was that some sort of subliminal message?

    I like the color, but in her case, and with the cut of the suit she was wearing, it made her look like Chairwoman Mao, lol…

    Like

  197. GB says:

    Just because her head didn’t explode on stage doesn’t mean he lost. I know that is what we wanted to see. And if she did explode on stage MSM would still call victory for her. Trump either had an off day or is playing long. Debate was a tie at worst, chill out, unplug, go shoot something. Guessing Trump didn’t want to turn on white knight mode in undecided herbs. We’re still good, start thinking about your own campaigns. America needs more than one shitlord politician.

    Liked by 1 person

    • oldfashionedfellow says:

      Exactly. Way too much anxiety here at the CH. Quite uncharacteristic, and very unbecoming.

      Look. The dominant narrative coming into this debate was that Clinton would kill him on policy, and that the $100 million dollars worth of slander and libel on Trump would be confirmed by Trump himself in front of 100 million people.

      Neither of those things happened. Her presentation was solid, (to be expected from a life long politician), but was hardly inspiring, and frankly was nothing your average practiced European Parliamentarian couldn’t have accomplished, and he managed to project a tolerable enough image to dampen concerns about his temperament.

      You people seem to keep confusing your built up personal fantasies of what you wanted to happen, wherein Trump conducted a masterpiece of artful destruction of her personal and professional life for 90 unrelenting minutes, all culminating in her collapse on stage from the overwhelming pressure of the Trumpening……with Trump’s real world goals.

      In reality, his goals were simple, LIMITED, and two fold; 1) don’t look crazy to the newbies thereby defying the image painted of him, and 2) deflect the nonsense charges of racism, sexism, etc. that Hillary would throw at him. Both could have been more artfully done (if Trump were a more studied and was trying less to appear inoffensive), but both were still accomplished.

      Now we have two more debates, and Hillary has shot her wad. Meanwhile, the big story for Trump coming out of the debate is why he left so much on the table. Emails, the Clinton Foundation, Speeches Benghazi, Immigration/Refugees, etc. Most of it barely mentioned, some it not at all.

      So what do you think the narrative going into the next two debates will be?

      What do you think he’ll be talking about?

      And what will Hillary have left to talk about?

      Relax folks.

      Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        thank you. group hug!

        Like

      • mendo says:

        I’m with pj as well.

        Good job!

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Been saying this all day.

        Like

      • Mario says:

        Deflect the nonsense charges of racism, sexism, etc.
        No way.

        Is someone triggered when for instance some sect, would claim that Earth is flat? And we are ruled by dinosaurs? Everyone would wave them off and smile at best. Not argue and shout.

        On the other hand, Challenge any libtard on race inequality. Gender biological inequality. Blame some random known whore for being whore. And see overreacted defense.

        Bullsh1t accusations deserve no reaction, apart from smirk and wave off. You may even look like idiot defending something obvious.

        Like

      • GCM says:

        “Now we have two more debates, and Hillary has shot her wad. Meanwhile, the big story for Trump coming out of the debate is why he left so much on the table. Emails, the Clinton Foundation, Speeches Benghazi, Immigration/Refugees, etc. Most of it barely mentioned, some it not at all.”

        You act as if people who are on the political fence have little to no clue about those things. So what if Trump brings it up during the second or third debates? It’s like telling strangers you and your girlfriend are shitty in bed when they’ve seen it on YouTube. It’s no surprise.

        Like

    • mendo says:

      Heck, reading the headlines and a few blurbs therein, and the comments here and there on the blogs I visit, have been more entertaining the debate itself.

      By Friday, it’ll be old news. And, if there’s a terrorist attack*–as they seem to be happneing with greater frequency–it’ll be ancient history.

      *One of these will soon have collateral damage involving some shitlibs and seeing how that’s spun to make the attackers victims will be a sight to behold.

      But, it’s 2016…anything is possible.

      Liked by 1 person

    • vfm#7634 says:

      Guessing Trump didn’t want to turn on white knight mode in undecided herbs.

      Yeah, them and women.

      Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      And thecunt may have been “solid”, but Trump still managed to beat her on policy.

      Like

  198. Carlos Danger says:

    http://time.com/4506217/presidential-debate-clinton-trump-survey/

    55% to 45% for Trump on the Time Magazine poll

    Like

  199. Sentient says:

    It’s over. Trump, the egoist, the racist, the narcissist, the liar, “won.” We all lost. His numbers will go up. She told the truth. So what.

    — Michael Moore (@MMFlint) September 27, 2016

    LOL

    Liked by 2 people

    • whorefinder says:

      His tears….his tears are sweet……

      living off their pain rape!

      Like

    • uh says:

      He almost seems to want him to win, he’s so tuned in to Trump’s momentum. Strangely, I felt the same about Clinton.

      Liked by 1 person

      • whorefinder says:

        Moore makes his money when there’s an R to go after. Note how he’s had nothing big since Bush. Moore ran out of money for tacos and cheezwhiz, he’s desperate to put a wild-eyed conspiracy on Trump like he did to W.

        Read between the lines rape!

        Like

      • Libertardian says:

        @whorefinder someone on MPC made the same point about the Daily Show once they no longer had Dubya to kick around. Hard to make a living giggling about the Establishment’s fuck-ups when you are the Establishment.

        Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      If Trump steals Michigan and Pennsylvania, it’s over, even if Hillary gets enough stupid Puerto Ricans and Central/South Americans in Florida to beat Trump there.

      Like

  200. vfm#7634 says:

    We have to understand that he was using comfort game and vulnerability game on the undecideds, who are mostly women and white knights who recoil at any man talking back at a woman. I know, it sounds dumb to us, but these women and white knights ARE dumb. And even then, Trump came off as a meanie to many of them, simply because he interrupted her a couple of times. (The fact that it was justified doesn’t matter, it would seem.)

    Here’s a column from JudgyBitch about the debate:
    http://judgybitch.com/2016/09/27/trump-gave-a-master-class-in-how-to-fight-with-a-girl/

    And in fact, I think that on the substantive policy front, Trump narrowly won, even if he blabbered too much about his business. He gave an indication that he knew what the biggest problems with our country’s economy were and how to bring jobs back. Hillary didn’t say anything substantive at all except tag-team with Lester Holt to hit Trump with rehearsed gotchas. There was no indication from Hillary that she would improve anything at all for regular Americans.

    Hillary narrowly won tactically by having Trump on the defensive and having him reacting to her and Lester’s frame, but something tells me that it was a big strategic win for Trump overall, for the reasons I’ve mentioned.

    As Scott Adams said, his goal was to convince the American public that he is not in fact a scary lunatic and horrible misogynist, and in that, he succeeded.

    Like

    • Libertardian says:

      True. Blue pills tuned in last night expecting to see him wearing a Pepe mask and swastika armband, since that’s what the Ministry of Truth has been telling them for the last fifteen months.

      Like

  201. I’m tired of being objectified by gay men

    Like

    • uh says:

      Pics or gtfo

      Like

    • I know “both” you “gentlemen” just hate Naziism and violence, but as a serious thought-experiment, I’d like to ask:

      Just how many people would a hypothetical Alt-Right regime have to gas before it gets through to you both that right-wing political discourse is not just some elaborate form of gay foreplay?

      Because Heaven knows you two reichshus dudes LURVE to try and make it sound so.

      And by “get a room” I don’t mean “return to your cubicles”.

      Like

  202. Captain Obvious says:

    I think our man in Pleasanton is tapping that mystery meat single mom with the D-Cups & the OCD http://blog.dilbert.com/post/151007796236/i-score-the-first-debate

    Like

    • plumpjack says:

      “My neighbor Kristina hypothesized that Botox was making her smile look unnatural….”

      “neighbor”? sounds to me like he’s in the friendzone, maybe with the occasional freebie to keep those dilbert-dollars flowing. keeps name-dropping her. maybe he’s pimping her to boost her career, but I doubt it. 80/20 fz’d.

      Like

  203. Conspirator says:

    Trump is letting the first pitch pass by. He will start swinging soon …

    Like

  204. tspark156 says:

    imagine you and me having a conversation and every time you made a point I replied with an answer that someone else had fed to me through the ear peace I was wearing. Would you believe those answers were really mine, or would you think I was really just someones shill mouthpiece?

    Like

Leave a Reply