Feed on
Posts
Comments

Literal Cuckservatives

The Dissidenti™™ and their frazzled hall monitors buzzsaw with talk about “cuckservatives.” It’s the shiv du jour, you see. As shivs go, it is in this ‘umble narrator’s opinion one of the more lethal of the semantic shanks employed by dark realists.

Lovers and haters of the Cuck Shiv gird for battle (well, the haters girdle for battle). The wielders love the twist of their shiny new toy. The haters brace defensively, shielding vitals. As well they should. CH commenters wonder, not without historical wonderment precedent for questions of Realtalk™ provenance aligned with Chateau themes, was it Heartiste who coined the “cuckservative” scarlet C? Answer: I don’t know. The first mention of it here is dated 24 Jun 2015. I suspect Poasting Whytes were first in the field with their version. Perhaps the term was independently formulated by multiple parties, inspired to simultaneous Phoenixian birth by the polluted cascade of daily poz.

I can tell you this for certain: The term “cuckold”, and its related emotional resonance, was thrust rudely into the public consciousness and popularized right here, at Chateau Heartiste, long before the current fascination with the pregnant (heh) weight of the slur. Kneejerk anti-truthers and perplexed alt-rightists scoffed at first contact with Le Chateau’s musings on the metadeath genetic threat cuckoldry poses to men, but in time even they began to see the value of the concept as a right and proper fitting metaphor for supplicants and sycophants and self-sodomizers of various stripes, which of course means they understood on a sub-discourse level the biomechanic sexual market truth implied by the insult.

To the gristle: What is a cuckservative?

Occam’s Razor ably decodes.

Very basically, the cuckservative is a white gentile conservative (or libertarian) who thinks he’s promoting his own interests but really isn’t.  In fact, the cuckservative is an extreme universalist and seems often to suffer from ethnomasochism & pathological altruism. In short, a cuckservative is a white (non-Jewish) conservative who isn’t racially aware.

That’s a serviceable academic description. I prefer something a leetle more… pungent.

CH definition: A cuckservative is a cowardly pussy who sucks up to leftoid equalists for mercy and pisses himself when he gets accused of racism, sexism, or anti-semitism.

Corollary to the above CH definition: The cuckservative will throw his brother and his nation under the bus if it means he keeps his token status as cog in the Hivemind machine. Those cocktail parties aren’t going to attend themselves!

So what’s the difference between a cuckservative and a garden variety shitlib? Delayed reaction. The cuckservative may or may not be a true believer in reality-denying feminism or anti-white antiracism, but he sure as hell knows to stick his crabbed finger in the air to see which cheek he should spread for his equalist overlord’s strap-on.

Some common traits of the species homo homo cuckservative:

– is quick to jump down the throat of any Realtalker.
– distances himself immediately from any ostensible ally who lets slip a jarring sin against the Narrative.
– will never once, not once, do or say something brave in his life.
– is at heart the rear-end of a lemming herd. won’t take a stand (or a plunge) until the numbers safely allow him to do so.
– is ignorant of or afraid to confront racial, ethnic, tribal truths.
– would rather bear witness to national decline and dissolution and preside over gross injustice than be on record that there are consequential race and sex differences beyond skin color and genitalia.
– thinks the only difference between the sexes that is acceptable to utter in public is the male penchant for gags and buttplugs. (he also projects wildly)
– dreadfully fears social ostracism, rendering him politically impotent.
– will force himself to clap loudly for pre-op Bruce Jenner, to coo falsely over mystery meat infants, to nod soberly in agreement when the pay gap lie is mentioned yet again as gospel truth, to pretend that Michelle Obama is attractive, and to insist women’s soccer is just as thrilling to watch as men’s soccer (which is not much thrilling to begin with).
– Will give every shrieking leftoid the benefit of the doubt while reflexively questioning the motives of every ballsy Realtalker.
– will preface every feeble tiptoe into his own Realtalk wading pool with an ass-covering “To be sure…” or a spastic impromptu paean to Martin Luther King, Jr.
– backs down with a quickness at roundtable debates with aggressive liberals.
– the only topics on which he won’t back down are taxes on the oligarchs and fighting terrorists over there so we don’t have to fight them here (while insisting open borders are American as apple pie and that muslim dude who shot dead a platoon of Christian soldiers was really a victim of discrimination and now, now, let’s not get crazy and question our shared enthusiasm for increasing Diversity™ in the military).
– will intone “diversity is our strength” while commuting home to an upscale gated community that is 98% White and 2% East Asian.
– exclaims “content of our character”, “fighting for freedom”, “blacks kill other blacks more than any other race”, and “hispanics are natural conservatives” without a hint of ironic detachment.
– has probably sexually molested a young boy sometime before his political career took off.

Cuckservatives are even more loathsome than true blue leftoid believers in the antiwhite progrom, because at least you can say the latter are loyal to a personal, if mortally twisted, ethos. The cuckservative is loyal to nothing but personal aggrandizement. The cuckservative so easily betrays his stated principles because, in fact, he has no principles. He is a globocorporate transnational post-american striver SWPL just as much as any of his ultraliberal co-evals, minus the overt eagerness for estate taxes and nationalized healthcare, and he’ll be damned if he’ll let some flyover smart-ass with an eye for both the big picture and the demonic detail to destabilize his easy-livin’ sinecure.

Given this list of characteristics, the “cuckold” root of the cuckservative metaphor is exceedingly apt. The cuckservative is, in habit of mind and sometimes in practice, that pathetic white man with noodle arms and crusted tear tracks sitting hunched on a stool in the corner of his bedroom watching, with willing fervor, his ecstatic white wife get pounded into post-white release by a buck nigra who eats his food and kicks his ass when the fridge needs refilling.

Yes, he’ll sit there nicely and putter with his pud while his wife (nation) gets banged out by another man (nonwhites, third world immigrants), as long as no one mistakes him for a small town prole who can’t tell the nose difference between a merlot and a pinot noir.

The cuckservative is cucked by antagonistic races, by antagonistic ideologies, by antagonistic corporate masters, by antagonistic talk show hosts, by antagonistic fat losers editorializing on the internet equivalent of teen beat gossip rags.

All he wants is their approval. A pat on the head from his sworn and intractable enemies. He swears he’ll keep his hands to himself and won’t cum until instructed to do so!

He is a low self-esteem, approval-seeking, whimpering cumlapper.

He is dog shit.

But there is hope.

Amazingly, some cuckservatives are LITERAL CUCKSERVATIVES. Commenter james1 peruses a few famous biographies,

It’s interesting that even though the Boehner family and the Bush family are Republicans, they are bigger race mixers than the Kennedy family and the Clinton family are Democrats. Jeb Bush married a Mestiza who looks like the maid at your local Motel 6 or Days Inn and John Boehner’a daughter married a Jamaican pothead who is a wannabe Bob Marley.

Also the Republican John McCain adopted a very dark skin girl from Sri Lanka while JFK/Jackie O and Bill/Hillary who are Democrats never adopted any Nonwhite children.

Literal cuckservatives take their prostrate mewling before the antiwhite mob a little too seriously. But with a familial C.V. like, for example, Boehner’s or ¡Jabe!’s, is it a surprise that these self-abnegating genetic dead ends can’t think clearly on the subject of race, borders, nation?

As Occam’s Razor puts it,

On the other hand, the idea of whites acting as a group to secure their own interests terrifies the cuckservative. If you ever want to troll a cuckservative, just repeatedly use the word “white,”  such as “this isn’t beneficial for the white community.”  The cuckservative will be triggered immediately.

Nobody gets triggered like a nancygoy cuckservative gets triggered. Truly pathetic specimens of manhood. Wasn’t Boehner the puffboy who blubbered like a baby on stage recollecting his time in the bathhouses of the Castro District? With “leaders” and “representatives” like him, who needs an opposition party? If Boehner wants a real reason to cry, he should reflect on his daughter’s coal burning, doing her part to destroy an aesthetic, cultural, and genetic heritage 20,000 years in the making.

The Cuckservative: Re-raising equalist leftoids, because, hey, he’s got something to disprove.

192 Responses to “Literal Cuckservatives”

  1. “…insist women’s soccer is just as thrilling to watch as men’s soccer (which is not much thrilling to begin with)…”

    Soccer is a sort of sado-masochism without the sex part

    The goal is too wide and too high thus pretty much impossible to guard, your natural instinct would be to use your hands but your hands are tied behind your back, the field is too large, it is an extremely frustrating game.

    If you like to play it you are bit masochistic, and if you like to watch it your a bit sadistic.

    I have hated soccer ever since I was introduced to it as a kid back in the late 1960s.

    • American football is much more frustrating. The goal is the entire width of the field, almost none of the players are allowed to touch the damn ball, and improvisation is banned.

      • Arbiter says:

        I have to agree with TSW here – I’m not a fan of either sport, and never a fan of lardasses watching sports as a way to have something to talk about with the other ignoramuses at work. But American football is definitely sewed together with a tighter sack of rules than soccer.

        One sport I enjoy watching is mixed martial arts like in the Ultimate Fighting Championship. Funny how, when you allow the fighters to get up close and personal without being broken up by an umpire, so that the longer arms of Blacks are no longer an advantage, Whites easily dominate. Hell, I have even seen a short Asian guy take down a large rastafari who could only swing his arms but had no technique. Wrestling is a good thing to know – wrestlers do very well in MMA.

      • Having to use your forehead instead of your hands to pass the ball is beyond unnatural and frustrating.

        It is like trying to give cunnilingus with your chin instead of your tongue.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        It is like trying to give cunnilingus with your chin instead of your tongue.

        Wha, you’re stealing my move now?

        Wha, you’re stealing my move now?

      • Steve Johnson says:

        Arbiter –

        True MMA favors grapplers even more than UFC rules which are built to discourage grappling – because mass audiences find it boring.

      • ho says:

        I don’t mind normal healthy self interest but the contrived muh muh white sin sports is amusing.

        Nigs do fairly well in MMA. They just don’t dominate your asses like in apehoop and boxing.

      • corvinus says:

        They just don’t dominate your asses like in apehoop and boxing.

        Only in sprinting. Apehoop is a groid ghetto here in the States, since it’s not a reliable career path. Even though white kids would do just fine in it — Italians and Lithuanians seem to do just fine against our nogs in international tournaments — groids have no marketable skills otherwise, so those with the right height and athleticism go into apehoop.

    • Irish Savant says:

      As with much of professional team sports football (soccer) has lost all of its original significance. Teams used to reflect their cities and regions. For example every single member of the Celtic team that won the European Cup in 1967 came from Glasgow. Now there are just a handful of white players on the team.

      Even “national” sides have lost meaning. The majority of players for France and Belgium (to name but two) are black or Arabic.

      • Dude says:

        “The challenge of football is to use your feet to achieve a goal that is difficult. It’s precisely BECAUSE it#s hard to do that shit with your feet that so many people like it.”

        You Eurotards are kidding, right? Soccer (only one of the six code of football) is so popular because it is a very simple game with few rules that can be understood by simpletons. In addition, it does not cost much, and so can be enjoyed by you sad plebian-types. As for the American games, the idea that you have any understanding of any of them is laughable.

        Soccer also suits your silly continental temperament. Rather than simply look at the score, you actually look at how many “chances” each side had, and argue (ad naseum) regarding whether the winning side “deserved” to win. What an onanistic endeavor. In America, here’s how we decide which team “deserved” to win: we look at the scoreboard when the buzzer sounds. As I say, arguing over who “deserves” (rather than actually doing something) really does fit you continentals much better than a real sport with actual scoring.

        As for the way ties are settled, . . . wow, just, wow, I can’t even (since pasty-faced upper-middle class millenials in America seem to love this ridiculous prole game, it seemed appropriate). That would be like deciding an American football game by running (competitive) passing drills. Who thinks that’s a good way to decide a game (of anything).

        And, yes, it is absurd that the most popular human game makes a point of preventing humans from using that which notably distinguishes primates from other animals. But, hey, you kids have at it.

      • Sol Lewinski says:

        REKT

    • Jack Rackam says:

      Our hands with opposable thumbs and our big brains are what set us apart from the beasts.
      Most human games use your amazing hands with their opposable thumbs. Usually your amazing big brain is protected with a helmet. There is only one game where you cannot use your amazing hands, and are encouraged to bash your big brain against the ball.

      The perfect player would be a mule: Thick skull, no hands, four feet.

      • The Spirit Within says:

        There are plenty of jackasses in soccer.

      • Arbiter says:

        It isn’t often the ball is hit by a player’s forehead. The point of the game is to use the much stronger limbs, the legs, and to do so you can’t have people pick up the ball. Again, I don’t enjoy watching soccer, but players not using their hands to pick up the ball – come on. By the way, they do use their hands and arms, as they are running. No one can watch a soccer game and say they don’t move their arms.

        “our hands with opposable thumbs and our big brains are what set us apart from the beasts.”

        Well, everything can be demonized, and everything can be paraded, it seems. You could also write about how baseball and American football chain otherwise free men with burdensome rules, preventing them from moving freely as Men of the West should. Etc.

      • ho says:

        Please, do yourselves a favor and stfu. You are continuously embarrassing yourselves.

        The challenge of football is to use your feet to achieve a goal that is difficult. It’s precisely BECAUSE it#s hard to do that shit with your feet that so many people like it.

        Blowing past some guy with the ball on your feet is more thrilling than doing so while grabbing it.

      • Dude says:

        “The challenge of football is to use your feet to achieve a goal that is difficult. It’s precisely BECAUSE it#s hard to do that shit with your feet that so many people like it.”

        You Eurotards are kidding, right? Soccer (only one of the six code of football) is so popular because it is a very simple game with few rules that can be understood by simpletons. In addition, it does not cost much, and so can be enjoyed by you sad plebian-types. As for the American games, the idea that you have any understanding of any of them is laughable.

        Soccer also suits your silly continental temperament. Rather than simply look at the score, you actually look at how many “chances” each side had, and argue (ad naseum) regarding whether the winning side “deserved” to win. What an onanistic endeavor. In America, here’s how we decide which team “deserved” to win: we look at the scoreboard when the buzzer sounds. As I say, arguing over who “deserves” (rather than actually doing something) really does fit you continentals much better than a real sport with actual scoring.

        As for the way ties are settled, . . . wow, just, wow, I can’t even (since pasty-faced upper-middle class millenials in America seem to love this ridiculous prole game, it seemed appropriate). That would be like deciding an American football game by running (competitive) passing drills. Who thinks that’s a good way to decide a game (of anything).

        And, yes, it is absurd that the most popular human game makes a point of preventing humans from using that which notably distinguishes primates from other animals. But, hey, you kids have at it.

        (Ha! Yeah, hit wrong reply the first time. Sorry about that IS.)

      • tspark156 says:

        Dude
        The only code of football that isn’t for pussies is Rugby and you Ameritards really suck at it. You should watch The Six Nations it’s like the Superbowl but not as gay as fuck.

    • PA says:

      I like soccer but I only watch it once every four years, and it’s mainly about cheering for countries I like.

      • PA says:

        Last time around I liked Germany. Before that it was Uruguay, the blondest team in the tournament.

        The francophile in me always wants the African All-Stars, aka France, to lose.

    • ho says:

      Lol at the OOGA BOOGA, CANT USE HANDS rants by Americlaps.

      • carlos danger says:

        Say what you want but soccer players are in excellent shape. Try running sprints for 90 minutes. I’m not a huge fan either, but my American comrades are indeed embarrassing themselves. Soccer players have much greater longevity than football players, far fewer serious injuries, and most pros make better money too. Soccer is a fluid game, like Rugby and it is that fuidity and how well it is executed in out maneuvering your opponent that is the real art to it.

    • Yosef says:

      It’s funny when an American manboob fatso lectures everyone about sports

  2. Experienced Father says:

    The Shiv of Darkness is strong in this one.

    • Captain Obvious says:

      On Fuchs News, they’re all cuckservatives, with the exception of Tucker Carlson [a Chateau lurker], Brian Kilmeade, Bill O’Reilly, and O’Reilly’s sidekicks, like Jesse Watters. I used to think that O’Reilly himself was a cuck, but something has changed in O’Reilly recently – something has lit a fire under O’Reilly’s posterior. And O’Reilly’s guests, like Dennis Miller, and of course Adam “You’ll Never Work Again in Eskimo Town” Carolla. Whereas Sean Hannititty got his balls cut off by someone, and now Hannititty is just another nauseating cuck.

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Adam Carolla was an early pioneer in Truth Talk. He turned his back on literally tens of millions of dollars [maybe hundreds of millions lifetime] when he refused to sell out, like his old partner, Jimmy “Sarah Silverslut” Kimmel. That takes some serious gonads to walk away from dough like that.

      • Arbiter says:

        So one has to wonder what the NSA has on Sean Hannity.

        “Nooo, the establishment would never use the information gathering from the NSA that way! They will only use it for the good of all of us! Suspicions like this one are never validated years down the road.”

      • Skunk says:

        I don’t like O’Reilly’s style. His style of debating is to concede all of the leftists major points right up front and then stubbornly hold fast on the minor stuff.

      • PA says:

        I’ll never forgive O’Reilly for going after an all-white private venue prom in 2002.

        He was also a huge advocate for the Iraq invasion. As far as I know, he never recanted, unlike Derb.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        You fucks put any credence in the allowed opposition?

        Sheesh… t-h-w-a-c-k never made me (((shake mah haid))) that much.

      • Captain Obvious says:

        As recently as a year or two ago, O’Reilly was still lobbing softball non-questions at Obama in their interviews. But something changed recently. O’Reilly is really, really pissed about something. I’d love to know what exactly was the straw that broke the camel’s back.

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Got a longer reply in mod about Adam Carolla, who walked away from GAZILLIONS of dollars in order to pursue a career in Truth Talk, and O’Reilly has been sponsoring Carolla since forever.

      • Captain Obvious says:

        GE, when Tucker Carlson is filling in on the early morning show [often on the weekends], he is throwing out 100% Heartistian Dark Enlightenment TRUTH TALK.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Oh, really? Does he say Eskimo or YKW when he names the Jew?

      • Steve Johnson says:

        Being totally out of touch with tv and seeing a youtube video of Bill O’Reilly interviewing Trume I was stunned.

        People think O’Reilly is on the right? The guy is a perfect cuckservative. The only things he got excited about were that Donald might not bestow sufficient education on the negro youth in Harlem or protect Israel vigorously enough.

      • Captain Obvious says:

        GE: Tucker Carlson recently talking about the state of college professoriate today: “THEY HATE YOU!!!” Recently talking about the state of immigration: “WHY ARE WE LETTING IN ALL OF THESE PEOPLE [immigrants] WHO WANT TO MURDER US?” Etc etc etc. If you’re a morning person, then try to catch TC, often subbing on the weekends.

      • Ripp says:

        Check this out:

        http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/07/on-trump-murdoch-has-lost-control-of-ailes-fox.html

        Rupert resigned as CEO for Fux News recent on July 1. New CEO roger ales appears tO support Trump however Rupert don’t like it…and apparently told new CEO to stop having fox support him. Lolz…

        Rupert is THE cuckservative. And fux news is cuckservative extraordinaire.

        In any regard these “news” corporations are controlled. And if the minions get out of line they get whacked.

        I love that Trump is stirring the pot and pissing everyone off. He’s bulldozing right through the bullshit and it’s great.

      • Captain Obvious says:

        SJ, I’m telling you, man, something has changed in O’Reilly recently. I dunno – it could be as simple as Trump telling O’Reilly that he wants him in a Trump White House – maybe O’Reilly as press secretary? Whatever it is, O’Reilly’s tone has changed. But to my eye [and ear], I feel like O’Reilly has finally realized what MK is talking about below: THIS IS WAR.

      • FUBSY says:

        O’Lielly is such a hack. He was against gay marriage until he was for it. He criticizes illegal immigration yet he’s for these comprehensive immigration reform bills. Well played Billy Boy….NOT!

      • Cortesar says:

      • Amasius says:

        I think a certain percentage of Irish Americans have a “fellow traveler” thing going on with the Eskimos and the anti-White agenda in general. Chris Matthews, Lawrence O’Donnell, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity.

        Pat Buchanan’s cool though. I like the Irish just fine, but sometimes I worry about them.

  3. Haven M. says:

    “All he wants is their approval.”

    they want you dead, so earning it can only be done through…um…self-abnegation.

    • King says:

      Conservatives thought they could placate their opponents by an act of good faith. “Hey, guys, we are willing to scrutinize the sins of the white man if you come halfway in our direction and let us keep our traditions.” It was a misplaced, gratuitous, and unreciprocated faith that our enemies (rightly) read as a weakness to exploit, which they did.

      That was then. There is no connection between 20th century conservatism and 21st. The ultimate sacrifice to white guilt — giving the negro the presidency to expiate our sins — severed that connection. We have gone from a political landscape where compromise was theoretically possible to a war-footing where the total surrender of one side must be unconditional.

      In other words, the cold civil war is going hot. The left, rejecting not just compromise but the very legitimacy of the right, forced the situation when we largely would just rather be left alone.

      The many well-meaning conservatives we are talking about here are not dumb or perversely attracted to their own humiliation (cuckoldry). They simply have not caught up with the news that this isn’t their father’s republic anymore. This is war.

      Matt

      • Captain Obvious says:

        > “this isn’t their father’s republic anymore. This is war.” —– It is so difficult to talk to older septuagenarian/octogenarian GOP Conservatives who came of age during e.g. the Eisenhower Administration – who possibly cast their first vote for Ike. It takes conversation upon conversation upon conversation to try to convince them that things are REALLY BAD out there now.

      • Tilikum says:

        Shit hot and right on .

      • Moses says:

        “Hey, guys, we are willing to scrutinize the sins of the white man if you come halfway in our direction and let us keep our traditions.”

        Nailed it.

        As I age (45 now) I have concluded that the overriding human motivation is will to power. It’s like a Grand Unified Theory that explains human behavior remarkably well. Humans will cloak their actions in different guises, but when you strip it all away they are solely motivated by will to power. It applies to everyone.

        Weak groups ALWAYS use “moral” suasion against the strong. Exhibit A the weak Europeans and the USA. They are always talking about international law, feckless UN, legal this and legal that. The reality is they are seeking power to control American action through the only means available to them. (Our idiot president gives our power away to them when he says America won’t act without their approval, but that’s another story.)

        Lefties and minorities are following exactly the same playbook.

        “Oh, I’m discriminated against. I’m paid 78 cents on the dollar, [insert bitching here], I need legal quotas and ability to sue!”

        This is just about power. And we have given it to them. It’s a loss of frame on a monumental scale. When they get full control there will be boots on all our necks. Non-whites do not carry the altruistic gene.

        No matter how “equal” (irony) things get rest assured the grievance industry will find new ways to manufacture problems. It’s always the white man’s fault. It will never stop.

        The correct response to all of this would have been to maintain frame. “Shut up and stop bitching. Work hard and you’ll get yours.”

        [CH: game can save civilizations.]

      • King says:

        Take away the social compact and within minutes you have the war of all against all.

        In such condition there is no place for industry, because the fruit thereof is uncertain, and consequently, not culture of the earth, no navigation, nor the use of commodities that may be imported by sea, no commodious building, no instruments of moving and removing such things as require much force, no knowledge of the face of the earth, no account of time, no arts, no letters, no society, and which is worst of all, continual fear and danger of violent death, and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.

        — Hobbes, Leviathan

        Whites and Asians have largely internalized the social compact, and they’re more surprised than other races when men go feral. They dismiss the degeneracy as less real than the artifice that seemed to effortlessly keep the degeneracy at bay. But, but, we have always been civil with each other!

      • DamnCrackers says:

        Only here can we get a Moses who’s read his Nietzsche. It was Moldbug who said, “Cthulhu swims slow, but he always swims left.” I always called the Republicans (at least the cuckservative RINOs) the Jester Wing of the Democrat/Socialists.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        No matter how “equal” (irony) things get rest assured the grievance industry will find new ways to manufacture problems. It’s always the white man’s fault. It will never stop.

        Exactly… the foremost example being, when the slavery-guilting well ran dry, they dug another one and called it “white privilege”.
        .

  4. Arbiter says:

    Hear, hear. It is fun to see how “cuckservative” has taken off on Twitter. There is an effort to make it trending (show up as “Trending right now” to Twitter users) just for laughs. The first time I heard it I thought right away that it was typical of CH wordsmithing, but probably it emerged as a group effort on Twitter after tweeking the “cuckold” theme, which as CH notes is definitely his. The fact that no one can say for sure where cuckservative was posted first points to it being a Twitter thing. The alt-Right is very active on that platform.

    The neocon lovers are now claiming on Twitter that “Remember, when white supremacists say cuckservative it is a slur against Christians”. Religion is never mentioned in relation to this word, but that’s their typical lying modus operandi. The only reason for that claim, I suppose, is that the churches are slavishly devoted to Israel and to attacking Israel’s targets, the few Middle Eastern nations that have supported the Palestinians. Added to that is the other media-Zio agenda, to fill the West with immigrants. So “cuckservative is a slur against Christians” – okay, I see it now.

    will intone “diversity is our strength” while commuting home to an upscale gated community that is 98% White and 2% East Asian.

    Very true.

    Just a while ago I talked to a woman who is “right-wing” in the cuckservative fashion: in favor of lower taxes, and that’s it. Other than that, promoting every leftoid strategy. She lives in an expensive neighborhood since two years back, but on the other side of a forest is an immigrant-thick neighborhood where there were a couple of days of riots a few years ago. Why didn’t she move there if “everyone is the same”? Cuckservatives are immense hypocrites. McCain, Jeb Bush, all the rest – they would rather see a third Obama presidency than Donald Trump in the White House, all the while sealing themselves off from the hell everyone else has to live in.

    At any rate, it’s fun to see a meme take off. Words, expressions, symbols – they are all part of what you call a “corporate identity” in rhetoric. Corporate here meaning corpus, body, the group. It is essential that the neo-reaction has a corporate identity. I’m just waiting for the theme song.

    • Arbiter says:

      A thing to add to the list of cuckservative traits:

      –Declaring that “Liberals are the REAL racists!”

      Way to stand up for yourself, buddy. Promoting the enemy’s paradigm, where racism is the one thing to guard against. Why then would anyone vote for “Anti-Racism Light” instead of “Anti-Racism All The Way”?

      • Hilary Clinton says:

        Hilarious COTY. Or their pathetic attempt to seek approval by citing the “conservative” MLK!

      • Philomathean says:

        Yes, the cuckservative thinks himself brilliant by calling the lib the “real racist”. The cuck doesn’t understand the liberal has already won because the left annexed that territory long ago. He’s playing on their field. It’s a rigged game.

        This is why politics drifts leftward. The cuckservative defense mechanism’s been disabled.

        Right wing ideas are spiritually about inequality, because inequality is the truth. Equality exists no place in nature, from microorganisms to megafauna it can’t be observed.

      • VRW says:

        liberals are the real racists and cuckservatives are the real liberals amirite

      • Arbiter says:

        Right wing ideas are spiritually about inequality, because inequality is the truth. Equality exists no place in nature, from microorganisms to megafauna it can’t be observed.

        How true. Which is why I say the entire Left comes from Marxism. Social Democrats, Labour, and U.S. Democrats. Even if leftoids do not call themselves Marxist, that’s the worldview – the paradigm. And that is also why I say there is no “third way”, libertarians are not “another ideology”, and neither are environmentalists or whatever. There are only two ideologies: the one that observes nature, including inequality, and adapts to that. And the one that claims all are equal, so that any differences in success between groups and individuals are the result of oppression.

        (As for libertarians they are either leftists or right-wing. These two groups are so different that it is meaningless to classify them with the same word. The right-wing libertarians are typically conservatives who want a fresher flag to rally under as they criticize the neocons, or who hide behind no-state talk as a way to criticize Affirmative Action and similar policies without being called racist. The leftist libertarians are only focused on homosexuality, feminism, drugs and mass immigration, and happily use the government to attack those who oppose these things. They go the same way as (classic) liberal parties in Europe, which are now only “right-wing” in that they want slightly lower taxes than the Social Democrats.)

    • Philomathean says:

      The first I read the slur was the other day at Occidental Dissent after, I assumed, Hunter Wallece coined the term “cuckfederate” to describe the rainbow confederate.

      In any event it’s a beautiful adamantium shiv whose semantic service is long overdue.

    • corvinus says:

      “Remember, when white supremacists say cuckservative it is a slur against Christians”.

      If they mean “Churchians” and/or “Zionists”, then guilty as charged.

      • Arbiter says:

        Seems the first to apply this “white supremacist” label to those who name cuckservatives is one Matt K. Lewis, writing at The Daily Caller:

        http://therightstuff.biz/2015/07/23/the-daily-cuckservatives/

        From his Wikipedia page: In March 2007, Lewis was one of two bloggers invited on John McCain’s campaign tour bus on a visit to New Hampshire for an interview with the candidate. That September, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich acknowledged in an interview with Lewis that he was considering a presidential run. Lewis is the editor of The Quotable Rogue: The Ideals of Sarah Palin in Her Own Words, published in 2011.

        John McCain, Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin – you go, Matt!

        Just showing the thousandth example of journalists and politicians being part of the same establishment. John McCain’s campaign tour bus – for F’s sake.

    • Steve Johnson says:

      “Cuckservatives are immense hypocrites. McCain, Jeb Bush, all the rest – they would rather see a third Obama presidency than Donald Trump in the White House, all the while sealing themselves off from the hell everyone else has to live in.”

      McCain is even worse – he’d rather see an Obama presidency than lose his status as the media’s favorite Republican.

      He 100% threw the election – luckily for America.

    • Anonymous says:

      Cuckservatives are reduced to saying “if you like Trump, you’re gay”:

      http://mpcdot.com/forums/topic/8496-the-donald-trump-presidential-archive/page__st__140#entry211528

      And the NYT is giggling with Queeg-esque triumph at the discovery that a bench was improperly removed from the lobby of Trump Tower back during the Smirk Administration. I guess this must have triggered some poor oppressed minority who was hoping to become the next Rosa Parks by refusing to leave when asked by building security (or maybe just to stop shitting there).

      http://mpcdot.com/forums/topic/8496-the-donald-trump-presidential-archive/page__st__180#entry211586

  5. […] Literal Cuckservatives […]

  6. The Other Jim says:

    FYI, John McCain’s son Jack, married a mulatto; Link: http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20705632,00.html

    The ironic thing is that the more these RINO-Cuckservative “elites” try to shed themselves of their “Whiteness” by marrying non-Whites, the more they become morally, intellectually, and spiritually inbred. They’ve taken up virtually every vice of aristocracy and are hell-bent on subjecting the rest of us under the regressiveness of feudalism.

    • Arbiter says:

      John McCain, the “hero” (for being captured? That’s what makes you a hero?), also sucked up to the prison guards in Vietnam by preaching their radio propaganda. Other prisoners have firmly stated that it was his voice.

      In 2001 he was going to switch to the Democrats, but he eventually stayed in the GOP probably because he took a look at the field and decided he had a better chance to retain his senator seat in the GOP. Google “John McCain switch parties”:

      What Mr. McCain almost never mentions are two extraordinary moments in his political past that are at odds with the candidate of the present: His discussions in 2001 with Democrats about leaving the Republican Party, and his conversations in 2004 with Senator John Kerry about becoming Mr. Kerry’s running mate on the Democratic presidential ticket.

      …….

      In the spring of 2001, Mr. McCain was by most accounts still angry about the smear campaign that had been run against him when he was campaigning for the Republican presidential nomination in the South Carolina primary the previous year. He had long blamed the Bush campaign for spreading rumors in the state that he had fathered a black child out of wedlock, which Bush aides denied. Mr. McCain was also upset that the new White House had shut the door on hiring so many of his aides.

      • Arbiter says:

        And let’s not forget McCain trying to show off as a pilot and almost sinking a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier, killing more than a hundred people in the ensuing fire. He got away because both his daddy and granddaddy were four-star admirals.

        https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/07/no_author/john-mccain-is-no-hero/

      • mendozatorres says:

        Damn, I didn’t know that about him in 2004.

      • The Other Jim says:

        Whatever ahem, “Honorable” thing McCain did as a POW as been completely overshadowed by his very “dishonorable” service as a senator. From the Charles Keating S&L scandal to McCain BFF’ing jihadists in Syria. The guy isn’t just a senile old git, he’s a fucking menace to America. In fact, I can confirm what you stated about the accounts of McCain’s fellow prisoners. My father was career Navy and worked with many of the POW’s while McCain was a guest at the Hanoi Hilton. All of them, including men like John Stockdale clearly stated to my father that McCain was treated with kid gloves in comparison to the beatings and torture the rest of them received. They all hated McCain and his subsequent piss-poor behavior as a senator confirmed why that contempt is justified.

        Also, looking at the wedding picks of McCain Sr, his son Jack and his mulatto wife raises an interesting question; If McCain Sr. is 5’7″ tall, then his son looks like he’s about 5’5″ tall. Talk about a family of hobbits.

  7. Ras al Ghul says:

    Most conservatives don’t stand for anything definitive other than the status quo. Its a defensive behavior and to take inspiration from General Patton, if you’re defending, you’re losing.

    And while there indeed may be things worth preserving, one has to understand why in order to defend them, not “this is the way its always done.

    • Arbiter says:

      Yes. There was an effort to base the Right on scientific thinking in the early 20th century, rather than “it’s always been that way” or “my religion says so”. To explain where traditions and group loyalty come from and why that unchangeable basis must be taken into account. Unfortunately the U.S. and its allies did everything it could to stamp out this kind of thinking, and so the only ones who try to explain things are the leftoids. They offer up a scientific-sounding worldview that connects the dots. Falsely connects them, but they are the only ones who seem to make an effort in that direction.

      • King says:

        Your fuckwitted guesses about history, politics, and philosophy get dumber with every post.

        There is no possibility of creating a politics of human behavior based on the scientific method. Human behavior is not reliably consistent like the laws of thermodynamics or photosynthesis or mitosis. You cannot set up a control, you cannot observe disparities, you cannot duplicate results. The very idea that one can reduce human dynamics to a science is a leftist presumption, you gullible ignorant goon.

        Demonstrate how the scholastic thinking that invented the modern scientific method is nothing more than “my religion says so.”

        And you think it’s the conservatives getting cuckolded? The leftist J ew has been raping your mind for so long you’ve convinced yourself he’s in love with you. He doesn’t care that you name him; he only wants you to spread his lies, as you so eagerly do.

        Matt

      • Ripp says:

        Queen B:

        Scientific method observation tells us that your behavior as consistently exhibited by erratic, argumentative and reactionary replies overwhelmingly supports the hypothesis that you rarely get laid suffer from gender identity between a gay hermit and gollum from Lord of the Rings.

        Further observation of your commentary also confirms severe social retardation and a life threatening lack of exposure to other humans in the physical world.

        Queen B you’re so deluded beyond your own capacity to even realize that you’re no authority to anything, and merely serve as entertainment fodder.

        When is the last time you have ever had a “discussion” with another,
        ms. Queen Sperg matt?

      • corvinus says:

        Human behavior is not reliably consistent like the laws of thermodynamics or photosynthesis or mitosis. You cannot set up a control, you cannot observe disparities, you cannot duplicate results. The very idea that one can reduce human dynamics to a science is a leftist presumption, you gullible ignorant goon.

        Not as individuals, since we all have free will, but at the societal level, there are tendencies, as with anything else. Such as, “the average white American woman will have 1.8 children.”

      • King says:

        Not in a way that is predictive with anything close to “scientific” precision. That is the asinine conceit of the social “sciences” and scientism, i.e., that the only legitimate knowledge is that which can be controlled for and reproduced.

        One can make broad generalizations about anything, but the power of the physical sciences is proved in the particular, or, like you say, “as individuals.” We know that this probe going X speed at Y trajectory will encounter the comet at Z time. But you can’t similarly say that this woman at X age will have Y children at Z time.

      • King says:

        You can posit broad generalizations about anything, but the power of the physical sciences is proved in the particular, or, like you say, “as individuals.” We know that this probe going X speed at Y trajectory will encounter the comet at Z time. But you can’t similarly say that this woman at X age will have Y children at Z time.

      • King says:

        Not in a way that is predictive with anything close to “scientific” precision. The asinine conceit of the social “sciences” and scientism is that only knowledge that can be controlled for and reproduced is legitimate.

      • King says:

        The power of the physical sciences is proved in the particular, or, like you say, “as individuals.” We know that this probe going X speed at Y trajectory will encounter the comet at Z time. But you can’t similarly say that this woman at X age will have Y children at Z time.

      • PA says:

        It’s concluded every century that art and religion are as close as you’ll get to understanding the human.

    • Skunk says:

      How about “because it works”.

    • carlos danger says:

      Which is why forums like this are important. The philosophical defenses of conservative principles are no longer taught, on purpose, so conservatives have no tools with which to go on the offensive.

  8. mendozatorres says:

    “well, the haters girdle for battle”…this one had me rolling, but nancygoy, stole the show.

  9. Johannes Balileo Balilei says:

    Cuckservativism is a world wide (West wide) secondary consequence. Cuckservatives are marxists. They believe in the creed and they know mainstream have the monopoly of morality. And the only thing that they can do are imploring for the forgiveness of their supreme lords by being between the real right and Hivemind.
    Cuckservativism is like take morphine to reduce the general metastasis in which the cells have loss their genetic directive and attack their body that serve a major cause.
    What can we do? Institute our own country. Where? I know a place where gays aren’t allowed, where women are hot, were people can be racist. And is a place with white people this country is not China, Japan or whatever nonwhite healthy country which ban subhumans.

  10. Shiv Bators says:

    “The cuckservative, although never Jewish, often seems vicariously to live through Israel. Since the cuckservative feels that he cannot defend his own ethnic interests, he’ll defend Israel’s. The cuckservative cares more about Israel’s borders than his own.” – Alfred W. Clark

    http://www.radixjournal.com/blog/2015/7/16/cuckservative-a-definition

    • Bobby Cuddlefuck aka The Hamster Whisperer says:

      This. The central tenant to cuckservative. Have them google the USS Liberty. Israel is a fucking plague.

      • Scanman says:

        This, indeed, nails it.

        The touchstone for both the anti-truth left and right is Israel/Zionism.

      • James1 says:

        Yes sir. Recently at a rather expensive hotel sitting out on the deck doing some paperwork. Very pleasent until two ki kes show up and start blabbering away. No surprise thy were talking about ethnic networking but all finance topics tied back to their support for the headquaters of their criminal enterprises – Israel. It nevers ceases to amaze how foreign these sh its are. Eskimo first is all they know.

        Now that dirty spy pollard is expected to be released to satisfy the same pepele who chase down the last 90 year old prison guard.

  11. corvinus says:

    Very interesting…

    Are Liberal or Conservative Americans More Likely to Support Restrictions on Racist and Anti-Religious Speech?

    This highlight:

    “Or consider a person who believes that Blacks are genetically inferior. a. If such a person wanted to make a speech in your community claiming that Blacks are inferior, should he be allowed to speak, or not?”
    •Liberals—67-33% yes.
    •Moderates—58-42% yes.
    •Conservatives—62-38% yes.

  12. newlyaloof says:

    cuckservative hasn’t yet reached the conservative radio show circuit yet, but I’ve noticed that even Mark Levin is talking about the invasion and how our culture is under attack. Of course he has to use safe terms like “American culture” and such, but the shiv is spreading like embers to a fire. I’d suggest people flood Mr. Levin’s Twitter until he sees this term.

  13. YIH says:

    What’s Behind The ‘Cuckservative’ Slur? (NSFW)
    Matt K. Lewis
    Oy vey! The goyim know!

  14. Travis Bickle says:

    Somebody *is* pissed. Fantastic rant. One nit pick:

    “Cuckservatives are even more loathsome than true blue leftoid believers in the antiwhite [ progrom ]…”

  15. Hilary Clinton says:

    “to pretend that Michelle Obama is attractive”. A biggy for the PC crowd. I knew BO was a psychopath when at the inauguration dance. “How beautiful does my wife look?” I studied his face – not a blink, no sweat, no body jerking, or any unease whatsoever. A just astonishing display of clinical doublespeak.

  16. Irish Savant says:

    There’s also what might be termed the Beta or Recessive Cuckservative. One who doesn’t really believe all the Cathedral bullshit but never ever ever voices an opinion either for or against, except to maybe its safest friends. A lot of them around.

  17. VRW says:

    the term has been floating around MPC and 8chan aristoi for at least the past 6-8 months i bet

  18. TLM says:

    CH
    Your common trait list was brilliant. And with a few tweaks it aptly applies to the churchians of this country.

    – is quick to jump down the throat of any person that teaches what the Bible actually says.

    – will preface every feeble tiptoe into his own version of the Scriptural wading pool with an ass-covering “To be sure…” or a spastic impromptu paean to Rick Warren, America’s Pastor.

    You get the point.

  19. elmer says:

    “will never once, not once, do or say something brave in his life”

    I am enjoying unemployment after having said something imprudent to my patron. I am working on an “ebook” to be released in a month and to be quickly followed by another blockbuster. I am going to sell my house and go live in vietnam with ForeignBride.

    Have you considered penning a topical interest book CH? You are just giving it away. With today’s technology you can put one together easily and provide a “click-pay” link on you website.

  20. Awesome.

    But it would also be helpful to analyze Christianity’s role in this, which I would aver is probably considerable.

    Christard Cuckservatives…this is what we’re dealing with.

    • PA says:

      I like how Matt put it recently: God will make all races come together in his own time and in spirit. Men who hasten that are working for Satan, not for God.

      • Arbiter says:

        Do they work for Satan? They would say the same about their opponents. Turn the other cheek, the first shall be the last and the last the first, there are no races because we are all “brothers in Christ”, etc. Odd how many contradictory political opinions can rest on a single book. How many opposing factions does that religion have by now? How many different opinions about it through the ages? I’m thinking of Kathars, Kopts, etc. Which one is right?

      • corvinus says:

        I’ve heard a tradition once that all human races will last to the end of the world.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        How many different opinions about it through the ages? I’m thinking of Kathars, Kopts, etc. Which one is right?

        In turn, they’re all right… and all wrong.

        Man has shown an infinite capacity to both make shit shine and fuck up a wet dream.

    • King says:

      But it would also be helpful to analyze Christianity’s role in this, which I would aver is probably considerable.

      Christianity’s role is considerable in every strand of thinking in the west, so you’re not saying much. Christendom = The West. The West is the fusion of Jerusalem, Athens, and Rome.

      This particular strain of thought — self-hatred — began in explicit anti-Christianity, in Rousseau’s rejection of original sin and the idea of the noble savage. Thereafter it hitched itself to popularity/credibility of duplicatable, observable experimentation and called itself a “science” despite being neither duplicatable nor observable, as though the consistencies of physics could be applied to human behavior, history, and politics. See Hegel, Marx.

      Race, as the great Steve Sailer defines it, is one’s extended family: kin, tribe, community, nation, ethnicity, race. Christianity unified the particular to the universal through this expanding family under the fatherhood of God. Modernity is patricide, and outside of his order, the nations scatter like Babel.

      Matt

      • PA says:

        “The West is the fusion of Jerusalem, Athens, and Rome.”

        And the pagan North.

      • King says:

        Not really. I see what you’re getting at, but there’s no evidence of it. Greece and Rome sufficed for the pagan contribution.

        On the other hand, it was the sons of the pagan north that would embrace the fusion most effectively, albeit a millennium later. Our blood brought forth the fusion’s most complete manifestation, both in the Protestant corrective and in the British (English/Scottish) balance between aristocracy and republicanism, liberty and law, sacred and profane.

        Matt

      • Amasius says:

        What about the names of the days of the week? Alliterative and stress-based poetry? The Nibelungenlied? The works of Richard Wagner? Saints’ legends? The mythology and folklore that led to Tolkien? The Faustian temperament Spengler wrote about?

      • carlos danger says:

        I would submit it was the pagan north that provided the necessary physical stock as well as numbers that made it successful.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Wagner gave us Parsifal as well as The Ring, don’t forget.

        And even The Ring is replete with symbolism that, in my mind, proves there’s an ur-myth that was remembered in different ways and came to us through different channels.

        Gifts from the High God, Life in the form of multifarious creatures, Provisos about how certain gifts are to be used or avoided, Envy & Treachery, Falls from Grace due to Pride or Insecurity, Sacrifice unto Death, Redemption, A New World, cleansed of the weakness and evil of the Old…

        It’s all there in both The Ring and Scripture… greatest stories told, indeed.

  21. Greg Eliot says:

    I’m guessing those who are now gnashing their teeth and wringing their hands over this RealTalk term are the same hypocritical fucks who gleefully coined and used the far-more impudent “teabaggers”.

    Those fairies.

  22. Trump/Dibiase 2016! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

  23. Mark Citadel says:

    Voting remains absolutely useless. No election ever changed anything. Until you Ceausescu the Left, they remain in power.

    • Arbiter says:

      The Romanian revolution is an interesting case, since it is one of the few times that a revolution actually was domestic.

      Of course, most of the criminals stayed in place. The officers who turned on Ceaucescu saw to that. The police who tortured and maimed protesters were never prosecuted, not a single one of them.

      Nevertheless, the way the revolution took off is a valuable lesson. The preacher who started it had worked within the system when doing otherwise was impossible. Neither he nor the other critics chose to take a stand by open rebellion at a time when they would just have been cut down. Better to network and gain followers by coded speech until the time when external circumstances allowed them to speak more freely. Two other truly domestic rebellions acted the same way: the Freemasons when they took over in France, and the Nationalists in Germany. Both took part in parliamentary activity and obeyed by the laws – mostly – when they could not do otherwise, slowly moving their positions forward, spreading their message and gaining followers. Until they could take advantage of their positions thanks to external factors.

      The lesson being that you can’t always run headlong across the battlefield, as hot-headed teenagers advocate when they first get involved in politics. Taking cover is not cowardly, it is an acceptance of the reality we have to deal with..

      However, there is a huge difference between advancing sensibly, and running far away from the trenches while loudly denouncing those who fight, as cuckservatives do.

  24. PA says:

    The word “cuckservative” is like ‘mudshark” in that it shines a spotlight on the essence of the offender’s error, and it is too hoary to appropriate defiantly.

  25. Putin says:

    HELP ME, IVE FALLEN AND CAN’T GET UP

    From July 20th post…….

    “Field Report

    At the HP and finally am able to settle in and focus. Gal(8) walks in who I introduced myself to a couple weeks ago. Saw her a couple times since and we just exchanged glances. This time I waited until she got her drink and then looked at her when she was about to pass. She looked at me and I said hi and then I got up and said I was going to sit with her. She said “alright but I don’t know if there will be room”. I kind of laughed, we found a spot even though I had to move a kids computer. So I started qualifying. Asked why she was bringing strange men into the place all the time. She said they were her brother and business partner and that is it. She was a little worried about me calling them strange and I said I was just kidding. Asked if she was Arabic as I had originally thought but she said she was half Arabic and half Spanish. Apparently she was schooled at a British school in Spain and went to college at Princeton. She basically owns an impressive business with another partner. She said she does not live here and is leaving at the end of the week. I asked for her number to input my phone and she gave me her phone because she did not know the number. I had a hell of a time reading it since the font was so small. Did a failed text to her, then finally a good text. We talked some more and I mentioned about her leaving to Spain at the end of this week. She responded with something about unless something keeps me here. I found myself having to calibrate things as it seemed things were on the verge of fast tracking. I said that we will see each other again before she leaves and she said she will be there everyday. I closed it out by saying give me a hug. She did and liked it.”

    It continues…….the next day she did not show at the HP so I decided to send a text which said missed you at coffee. In fact I sent texts to two other contacts in my address book probably for emotional reasons. Did not get replies from any of them.

    Next day was sitting out front of the HP and see her walking with a little stroller suitcase from a distance just as another gal stops at the entrance way and makes a playful remark at me. Perfect timing as she may have noted the situation. She gets to the entrance way and I say that I texted her and she says she had to fly out. I ask where and she says California. So she asks about me sitting outside and I say that I will be coming back in and will see her in a while. I come back in and she gets her drink then sits it on a table and I set my stuff down and sit down with her. I open up a little about my business and how it is very cyclical and going through a rough patch right now. She opens up some about herself. She notices my roving eye and looks at the women I look at whenever my eyes are roving. She sees a table open in a more secluded area of the place and says lets move. I grab her little suitcase and bring it over and she thanks me for doing so. She opens up a little more and says she hates people who lie. She hates white lies. She is pissed at her business partner and starts taking calls from him. She is absolutely tearing into the guy. Calling him a liar saying she won’t tolerate a business partner like that. It was a business issue but she seemed over the top pissed. She would hang up on him and he would call back. I had seen him in the place with her before and he seemed kind of beta but who knows. I say to her that she must like him. She says no and that her last boyfriend was a guy she broke it off with a couple years ago because he told her she needs to get over her mothers death. I say that she should not get married. She admits that maybe she should not because she likes things a set way. I tell her that she needs a good beta that will do what she commands and she says she does not like that. She likes a real man. So the calls go on and I take myself outside to do my thing and come back, We talk some more and she said that her Dad used to read her Palms and asked me to. I took her hand a gently glided my finger over her life line and said “wow you have a long life line”. She liked it. I handed her hand back and she said is that it? I said that I don’t want to tell any white lies. She took another call and it was her business partner and she started ripping him again. I left to go to the bathroom. I came back and she was still on the phone so I sat down and put my hand. She looked at me then hesitantly handed me her hand. I held it and said that I have to go. She tole her business partner to hold a second. So I said I will text you. Then I got up and pulled her arm while saying give me a hug. She got up and went for the hug while saying “you are tall”. Then she said “text me”. That night I sent a text which said Hey ____, I brushed up on my palm reading and will see you tomorrow.

    Today I went to the HP with great expectations. By the way she had previously told me that she had a corporate a apartment here. Anyways I waited and never saw her then my 70 year old wing man shows up and he gets his drink and we go outside to sit at a table. I am starting to get a little down given the feelings which have developed. I eventually tell him about her and as I pull up the text I sent and say when I sent it and what I said my wing man says oh here comes one. I just take it in stride when all of a sudden I see who he is talking about as SHE is passing me with her business partner. She turns to me and says in a happy go lucky way “we are just taking a walk”. I kind of just look at her and say nothing. I just maintain eye contact and say nothing. As she walks away I feel my heart being ripped from me. A feeling i have not had in a long time. My wing man is looking at me saying wow, she seems happy. I keep staring in shock. Then the unintended sucker punch comes from the wing man when he states she looked like a 9, don’t you think, validating my conservative rating of women. But the fact he brought up she was a 9 almost put me down for the count. I finally am able to tell him that she was the one I was telling h9m about. He says really! She may have seen my text to her as she passed me when I was talking about her.

    Mario, you out there.

    Fire away…..

    • Putin says:

      Let me add that she is supposed to be going back to Spain at the end of this week for SIX months. Also grabbed her arm when we were sitting together at the last meeting and she kind of looked at me. I asked if it was alright. She said it is normal. lol.
      Anyway I am thinking there could be some testing going on so my go to strategy in these cases is to shut it down. In fact skip the HP all together tomorrow. Go on Monday and see if she is still here.

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Putin, are you purposely trying to upend every political thread with your Rooney Rifle poon patrol logs?

  26. Putin says:

    Awaiting mod

  27. BigAl says:

    “Calling Dr. Cuxtable”

  28. Just found this. The rise of the term “cuckservative” is appropriate.

  29. YMCA says:

    God dammit. You’ve convinced me. Going republican now for sure… I too cry over fond memories of the bath houses in the Castro…

    rub a dub dub…

  30. […] provides a must-read tour de force on […]

  31. ewanmacerc says:

    In college (I graduated in ’08) I bought into the conservative-movement-has-failed mindset completely.

    A year ago, I started law school, and thought, ok, I’m not wrong in my beliefs, but I’ve got to put effort into this investment I’ve made, into the establishment and the system. I’ve got to show that I’m trying to take it seriously. I’ve got to give them a chance.

    So, I worked the polls for some local GOP candidates, on behalf of a classmate acquaintance who is a veritable Mr. Republican.

    Then Trump rolled in, and Mr. Republican was dumping on him from the moment the Donald opened his mouth. “Sign this petition to show you stand against trump!”

    I noted to him on social media that the GOP, at the very least, could manage to say something like, “Trump is reckless, but he’s identified a real issue and we need to be more solid.”

    Zero response.

    Hey, I worked the polls for this fucking guy. Haven’t I demonstrated enough commitment and intelligence to merit a response? I guess not.

    If anything, maybe the conservative-movement-has-failed, GOP-has-sold-us-out material I bought into wasn’t pessimistic enough. They have more loyalty to social justice warriors.

    Fuck them. War on.

    • Arbiter says:

      Very telling. As you say, they are more loyal to the SJWs. They pretend they are cursing Obama, but it’s all a show. They are generally in agreement with him.

      Here’s a lesson people need to learn: don’t think the neocon-loyal cuckservatives will give you anything for your work and allegiance. They are part of the Left, and the Left is extremely ungrateful. They’ll drop you immediately when you go against their core message, and they will not feel any obligation to show you respect, the way you think people should feel toward someone who has worked side by side with them. You think like a normal person, but these people in the political establishment are not normal people. They are psychopaths.

    • King says:

      They have a name for this moment in the cycle: the silly season. There are seventeen Republicans “running for president.”

      The celebutainment complex is not going to give you the real story because they profit so much on keeping the silliness stirring. But the real news is this: presidents are not selected two years before election day. Rather, parties are circumscribed and campaigns are shaped during this time — which is almost as important as the actual election.

      It matters so much more that Trump is demonstrating the effectiveness of a strategy than any temporary bump in the fake polls (which are worshiped like Delphi and used as ideological weapons more than they discern a truth about the electorate, but that’s another story).

      The same thing happened with Gingrich last cycle and Palin the cycle before. Somebody finally, finally stood up and just started punching media faggots in the mouth. It doesn’t even matter if they’re truthful, they are just proving their strength. If the dude can’t fight, we will nominate someone who can even if he was a lefty blowhard the day before yesterday. Before The Donald started swinging his dick around, Carly Fiorina was looking like our best bet in that regard!

      The queer Republican candidates who lost their shit about the McCain putdown did nothing so much as reveal they have no plausible plan to get to the White House. There is plenty of time to acquire one, however, and the most important thing Trump has done is to expose them as unready shills who will once again bend over for the media to pleasure themselves inside their quivering colons.

      Unlike the GOP contests going back for thirty years, the next president will not be able to passively coast to the nomination. He will have to learn to fight or get flattened by the big bully with the combover hair helmet.

      Matt

      • Ripp says:

        Queen B you were just trash talking Trump and now you’re giving him support. senial retard.

      • Philomathean says:

        Ripp,

        It’s fresh air to hear sombody–ANYBODY–speak a degree of truth. As Greg said, it makes blood sing!

      • King says:

        Where and when did I “trash … Trump,” you uppity sped?

        Senial?

      • PA says:

        MK, this was a good and clear comment.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Ripp, get on the right side of things or just shut the fuck up when men are talking.

        You have a bad habit of interjecting snark at the wrong time and place… and more importantly, person.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      • Putin says:

        I was never a big fan of Trump but the fact of the matter is most Americans should be supporting him as he fights against the entrenched and evil neocons. When the Democrats, Republicans and media hate someone you know there must be a reason. Here is a guy, although not perfect, challenging the evil status quo.
        All the people who complain about Washington need to get their shit together because as I have said before there will not be revolution in America. America=highest medicated, most monitored and most propagandized people on earth.

    • Anonymous says:

      Yep. It’s telling that you hear cuckservatives mewling about how the GOP needs to “rehabilitate its image”, as if it and not the shitlibs had the poz beaten out of it last November. Not just cowardice, but treason.

    • Greg Eliot says:

      ewanmacerc, you’re going to find that your so-called friends and allies… even family… will invariably let you down the moment you do or say something that doesn’t scratch them where they itch…

      … no matter how many times in the past you’ve been there for them.

      So harden your heart, but remain open to finding those one or two people in this world who will stand by you beyond the times of fair weather.

  32. Cortesar says:

  33. Anonymous says:

    CH at its finest. This seriously cuts to the bone. And is hilarious as well.

  34. Sentient says:

    @Culum ” I’ll still use sugar sites when travelling and I will go back to strip clubs (default option for solo game for me) so will definitely be practicing on pros!”

    Posting here so maybe you will see it. NO NON NO… Dude just DO cold approach. Especially when you are travelling. You can be anyone you want to be. Hotel lobby is solid gold. Any one set there after 9PM is flashing a neon sign for you. And logistics are great.

    You shouldn’t discount the HUGE advantage you have in having game AND making the approach. It’s much more visceral than after setting up meeting logistics emails etc. It’s IN THE MOMENT.

    Strippers and part time whores… man that is like pushing for Everest on your first climbs… Plenty of great ops out there with cold approach.

    Try it.

  35. UMADDOEBRUH says:

    ROFL STILL BANNED IN TWITTER

    • Travis Bickle says:

      “ROFL STILL BANNED IN TWITTER”

      Read Milo’s 3 part series on that crazy, disgusting, walrus – bodied junkie, randi something. I bet this is her.

  36. Samadhi says:

    I can’t bring myself to hate ‘cuckservatives’. Many seem genuinely lost in the equalist/blank slate matrix and should serve as motivation to get Alt Right ideas into the mainstream.

  37. Putin says:

    Mario, you out there bro? Got one in mod need some help on.

    • Putin says:

      Still in mod.

      When in doubt drop all contact. Screw it if she is leaving this week. My wing man said to text her when she passed me but knew that was a beta trap. What a trip. Could not imagine feeling this way

  38. SC says:

    A lot of WNs overestimate the homogeneity of the places where elite Whites live. You gotta remember that the census counts Jews as White, and Jews have significant representation in America’s most desirable zip codes. None of the elite zip codes in my state are anywhere near “98% White, 2% Asian.” They are mostly like 85% White, 10% Jewish, 5% Asian, with one notable exception (that town is like 65% White, 12% Asian, and 33% Jewish).

    [CH: stop deliberately missing the point.]

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Lenny Bruce: “I was up in Oyster Bay the other day and…”

      Heckler: “What were YOU doing in Oyster Bay?”

      Lenny Bruce: “I was passing… what the fuck do you THINK I was doing?”

  39. Putin says:

    Oh forgot to mention at the HP today asked a couple college gals what percentage of women do they think use Tinder or other online service for dating. They said at least 50-70% WTF!!!!! Is it all going that way. I think most guys I see in the wild are scared to death of approaching a women. I saw a 8-9 walk in and watched a guy act like he was looking at his computer while staring at her. Seen this kind of thing before but it still amazes me. The guy would never have got up and talked to her.

    My wing man admitted he would never have the balls to approach a women so he enjoys watching me. Worth the price of admission.

  40. zillanation says:

    You have openly credited /pol/ for material before. But you claim you don’t know where cuck got big.

    Cumskin please. Fuck was the go to insult on /pol/ back in 2013. Cuckservative had been around almost as long. This comment will not make it past moderation but what matters is that in your heart you will know at least one person knows you’re a meme stealer.

    There’s no shame in propagation of a good meme. And you’re clearly a genius when it comes to game.

    But goddamn boy, stop pretending you invented evo pysch and /pol/ memes. It’s fucking embarrassing.

    • COHOMOLOGIQUE says:

      crude “meme”-source controversy. This is where the West is right now. It’s hail-mary time, mos def.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        +1

        This zillanation clown is the type of guy who would argue deck chair placement on the Titanic.

  41. RambleAround says:

    “Does the mainstream media feel in charge?” -D Trump, as Bane.

  42. Robert What? says:

    We all know that Trump won’t be the next President. The fix is already in for Hillary. But we should all thank him for the entertainment, for outing the cuckservatives, and for raising issues no other candidate dares.

  43. Moses says:

    “– will intone “diversity is our strength” while commuting home to an upscale gated community that is 98% White and 2% East Asian.”

    This.

    A few years ago I connected the dots and realized that rich white libs who say this “diversity is strength” crap are THE MOST racist in deed. ALL of them live in lily white communities like Newton MA or Mill Valley CA.

    If you haven’t noticed this by now you aren’t paying attention.

  44. FUBSY says:

    Never liked the Trumpster, but I have to admit, he’s speaking truth to power.

  45. Moses says:

    I figure a good way to kill this diversity crap is to jump on the bandwagon. Every time some white leader (biz, non-profit, social workers, university president, whatever) laments the lack of diversity in his/her institution, be vocal about how their white asses are taking up valuable Diversity(tm) space.

    The best thing they can do is resign to make way for more vibrancy. After all, their white skin renders them with no value so why are they still there? It’s fun to watch them squirm and come up with reasons why “other white people” should be denied opportunity instead of them.

    When I was in biz school I met the retired chairman of AT&T, Henry Schacht, at a brown bag lunch with some other students. He waxed poetic and brimmed with feelgoodness as he told us now women and minorities suffered so much and there should be set-asides and quotas for them (i.e. suppressive quotas on capable white men).

    Even then before I was red pill I realized “What an asshole. He got his, retired, and now he wants polish his cuck credentials on my back. He didn’t step down to ensure a minority took his job. Hypocrite. Fucker.”

    These white knights, cuckservatives racial masochists are our biggest enemy.

  46. PA says:

    The cuckservative unveiling was Bob Dole’s nomination acceptance speech in 1996. “For those who hate, the exits are clearly marked” (paraphrase).

    For all of GHWB’s faults, he nominated Clarence Thomas, let the imperfect Dan Quayle run free with social conservatism and stood by him, and had Pat Buchanan speak at his 1992 convention.

  47. Putin says:

    Came through mod!!!

  48. PA says:

    Cultural cuckoldry includes the system’s co-option of artists. A case study in this is U2.

    The artist, almost by definition, is a passive, suggestible creature in that he is a conduit to higher inscrutible truths. But this can make him vulnerable to propagandists with jangling coins.

    I see U2 as great channelers and interpreters of the Northern pagan acceptance of Christ. You can feel it in their peak albums “Achtung Baby” and “Zooropa.” A bit earlier they recorded “One ” the perfect prayer except for the overlay of Moloch-globalism in the lyrics. Still, a lot of gold there, if you can sift away the lies.

    Their earlier stuff is young man’s search for the truth. “Wild Horses” “So cruel” and and “End of the World” off Achtung Baby are his search for love. Zooropa has good songs, not in the least a prophecy with Johnny Cash, “The Wanderer.”

    • King says:

      I would go back further, to Eisenhower. He sealed the New Deal in a way no Democrat could, and he not only built the Warren court, he made a big show of enforcing the lawless social engineering of Brown v Board at literal gunpoint.

      Nixon co-opted the left to engineer his second-term landslide. Yes, it would be a long, slow, developing degeneration.

      We rebounded with Reagan for a moment, but on election night 1988, GHWB was already walking it back with his fagtastic announcement of a “kinder, gentler” regime. Dole was a bemused and bewildered loser. Then came Bush’s son and “compassionate conservatism.”

      Rockefeller Republicans thought they were being clever, neutralizing the issues that got them bad press. It might even have been an effective strategy if the left were honest opponents rather than power-rabid saboteurs drunk on an alien ideology, hellbent on murdering their father, burning his legacy, spending his money, and shitting on his exposed corpse. “It’s called progress, DAD.”

      • King says:

        The mid-2000s shift from loyal-opposition Democrats to a hardened, anti-American fifth-column came as a surprise even to the apparatchiks themselves. Harry Reid used to be a moderate Western Democrat and anti-abortion. The Clintons were triangulating southerners in the DLC mode.

        But the orgasmic white-guilt poz load that was triggered by the possibility of electing a brown, pure ideologue turned them all into saps. The otherwise reliable anchors at Fox News broke down into tears the night the returns came in, shortly before the infiltrating operative announced the fundamental transformation of the country he hates.

        If the perfidious ni g ger had been ousted four years later, 2008 wouldn’t have been the turning point. But the confirmation of our mistake, and repeating it soberly this time, erased all doubt who was poised to win the cold civil war without so much as a stand-up fight. And like with any devastating loss, some men get radicalized and rally, but most lose morale, to the point of voluntarily bending over for their punishment, which they convinced themselves to regard as unfortunate but sadly appropriate.

        Matt

    • COHOMOLOGIQUE says:

      As for artists, the realm of rawness in music and the visual, and even literary arts has somehow been raped/humiliated by the technosphere. That’s where the real cultural cuckoldry is as far as I’m concerned. Lots of you guys have an inferiority complex that makes the negroes’ one look suddenly trivial. The net just *perceptually* amplifies total absurdities, and guys are total pawns to it.

      “As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny “failed to take into account man’s almost infinite appetite for distractions.” -N. Postman

  49. Cortesar says:

    Gardening is a creative activity. It absorbs a lover of gardening in the same way as poetry absorbs a poet or painting absorbs a painter. It is more concrete than poetry and painting and has a more universal appeal. Even children and the unlettered, who cannot enjoy poetry and painting without developing the skill of interpreting symbols represented by words or colors, derive immense aesthetic pleasure from the shape, color and smell of plants, grass and flowers that abound in the well laid out garden.
    Moreover, garden provides an inexhaustible source of poems and paintings all over the world. Gardening keeps the body fit while it refreshes the mind.

    Garden is nature made to order. It is the box where sweets compacted lie there is no end to the refinement which can be brought about in a garden through the myriad shades of colour of plants and flowers and the fragrance associated with them. Keats has captured the excess of a garden’s charm in his famous ‘Ode to a nightingal

    • PA says:

      “Ode to a Nightingale” is a great English language poem. I just re-read it. Thanks for reminding me of it. Check out Milton’s “Lycidas” for another (much longer) poem with descriptions of gardens.

  50. Capper says:

    Hi CH (and readers);

    I’d like to share this cut and paste with you guys from the CBC (Canadian national news site). The following is in response to this latest shooting in Lafayette in the comments section under the main story. This is the exact type of guy who is so often mocked on CH’s site.

    —————————————

    alchemy (<— ed: poster’s name)

    Time to start “profiling” white males.

    They are responsible for the vast majority of mass and multiple shootings, especially in the U.S. but also here in Canada and I can recall one particularly bad case in Norway.

    Speaking as a white male myself, I think if we are really serious about being “Tough on Crime™” and focusing on the biggest threats and if people have been suggesting “profiling” middle-eastern types and “carding” young black males surely we can start routine spot checks on white males, especially the “loner” and “loser” types.

    Make special note of the ones that are obsessed with guns as the ones advocating for gun *control* are responsible for only 0.0000000001 per cent of these shootings.

    You could start by asking CSIS to keep files on all the angry, anti-government, anti-feminist, anti-progressive, anti-gun-control white male haters that regularly vent their spleen right here on the CBC site.

    ————————————–

    ^^^^ the last paragraph is the best of all. CSIS is the Canadian intelligence service. ” Cuck on Crime ” is more like it…

  51. Anonymous says:

    kinda off topic, what is the evolutionary reason for altruism in whites?

    if i put a charity donation box in a store in the middle of an asian city and came back a period later, would i come back to find a near empty box compared to if i had put it in a white country? (safe to say if i left it in a black city the empty box would be stolen after 5 mins lol)

    • Amasius says:

      It’s how we evolved. Small groups of Northern ice-age hunter-gatherers who had to take care of one another or perish. Populations were small and sparse because of the harsh environment which led to individualism as opposed to everywhere else where food was comparatively abundant and supported big groups which led to collectivism– in-group and out-group tribal thinking.

      Dr. Kevin MacDonald is the best guru on these issues, so I recommend looking up his writings.

  52. duderino says:

    Here’s how Trump wins against Hillary: He chooses a black woman (Oprah?, Mia Love?) as his running mate. VPs don’t determine policy, so I don’t care. The democrats fate rests almost entirely on the turn out of blacks against Republicans. This move turns the whole narrative of a woman fighting to break the glass ceiling upside down. Now, this privileged white bitch is talking down to a b girl, and creates a circular firing squad on the left.
    It reminds me of South Africa, where the blacks are implementing strong immigration restrictions. They know where their bread and butter is, and don’t really want any competition. Republicans are wasting their time appealing to Hispanics. Anything short of full amnesty will be to little for them. Full amnesty creates an ungodly amount of welfare dependents and thus democrats. Taking a chunk of the black vote is a more logical path to victory for Trump.

    • Greg Eliot says:

      And yet, by playing that game, even if mere lip service, the Cathedral’s foundation remains solid.

      I guess being clever and trying to beat the enemy at it’s own game is one strategy… but you’re implicitly giving their game credence, then.

  53. Corvo says:

    “What an asshole. He got his, retired, and now he wants polish his cuck credentials on my back. He didn’t step down to ensure a minority took his job. Hypocrite. Fucker.”

    Yeah – this sums it up precisely. Whites in positions of power (retired or not) who buy into the SJW propaganda on racial benefits for the “diversities” has betrayed his own people. There aren’t enough lamp posts …

  54. druithin says:

    When we want to disprove the words of the one expressing “disapproval” towards us, falsely, we have already accepted the false guilt which was the intended purpose of the false accusation in the first place! This creates false action and is a false solution.

    Everything false the Enemy controls, because it is of him – he is the father *of* it.

    It is in this way, debating with the devil, that we are conquered. Instead we must be like the archangel Michael who, when contending with the devil, did not dare to argue against him but stated forcefully with power, “The Lord rebuke thee!”

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion